Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies 5th edition_Evans_2007
.pdf
NYSTAGMUS |
18 |
|
reduced vision may be attributable in part to the ocular oscillation and in |
|
|
part to amblyopia that occurred secondary to the oscillation (Spierer 1991, |
|
|
Chung & Bedell 1995, 1996). |
|
|
One interesting feature of CN is that most patients do not experience |
|
|
oscillopsia: they are unaware that their eyes are ‘wobbling’ (Bedell 1992). |
|
|
This is in most respects advantageous but the lack of feedback about their |
|
|
nystagmus might be one reason why they are unable to control their ocular |
|
|
oscillations (Abplanalp & Bedell 1983). Many forms of putative treatment |
|
|
aim to provide this feedback. |
|
|
Refractive management: spectacles and contact lenses |
|
|
Patients with CN often have better vision with contact lenses than with |
|
|
spectacles. The improvement may be attributable to optical factors and to |
|
|
the contact lenses providing a form of biofeedback (Abadi 1979). The lenses |
|
|
seem to provide tactile feedback from the inner eyelids that dampens CN |
|
|
and results in better acuity (Dell’Osso et al 1988). Dell’Osso et al’s study used |
|
|
soft lenses, although one might expect a greater improvement from rigid |
|
|
lenses and this concurs with clinical experience at the Institute of Optometry. |
|
|
It is possible that, when the lenses are removed, there may be a ‘rebound |
|
|
phenomenon’ of dizziness and oscillopsia for 5–20 min (Safran & Gambazzi |
|
|
1992). This phenomenon appears to be rare. |
|
|
Dell’Osso (1994) recommended that patients with a convergent null pos- |
|
|
ition could benefit from prisms with –1.00 overcorrection to create accom- |
|
|
modative-convergence. In other cases, pre-presbyopic patients may require |
|
|
a positive reading addition (Evans 2001d). The important point is to evalu- |
|
|
ate whether patients are capable of binocular single vision and, if so, to care- |
|
|
fully investigate the effect of refractive correction on their binocular status |
|
|
(Evans 2001d). |
|
|
Prismatic |
|
|
It was noted above that the intensity of CN is sometimes reduced in near |
|
|
vision. This effect is not mediated by convergence or accommodation but is |
|
|
determined solely by the angle between the visual axes (either symmetrical |
|
|
or asymmetrical): binocular viewing is not necessary (Abadi & Dickinson |
|
|
1986). This suggests that one treatment approach, prescribing base-out prisms, |
|
|
can help in these cases. This is not a universal treatment: most cases of CN |
|
|
do not show a reduced nystagmus at near (Abadi & Dickinson 1986) and |
|
|
there may even be an increase in intensity at near in some cases (Ukwade & |
|
|
Bedell 1992). |
|
|
Some cases of CN benefit from the correction of small vertical devi- |
|
|
ations (Evans 2001d). Yoked prisms can also be used in nystagmus to cause |
|
|
a version movement so that the eyes look through the null gaze position |
|
|
without an anomalous head position, or with a reduced anomalous head |
333 |
|
position. |
|
|
|
|
|
NYSTAGMUS |
18 |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placebo |
|
0.65 |
|
|
Experimental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
VA |
|
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
Second |
Third |
Post-treatment |
|
First |
|
|||
|
|
Assessment |
|
|
Figure 18.2 Graph of high-contrast Bailey–Lovie visual acuity (VA) at each research visual assessment (error bars represent 1 standard error of the mean). VA is in LogMAR units, so that smaller figures represent better VA (0.4 represents 6/15 and 0.5 represents 6/18). VA was measured three times before treatment, to investigate the practice effect, and once after treatment. (Reproduced with permission from Evans et al 1998.)
described the use of intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) for the treatment of congenital idiopathic nystagmus. Scheiman & Wick (1994) described a case study where IPS had been used to treat nystagmus successfully. An RCT of this treatment is described below.
Combining treatment approaches
The greatest chance of success will probably be obtained by combining |
|
two or more of the above methods. Ciuffreda et al (1982) described a com- |
|
bination of auditory and visual biofeedback. Mallett & Radnam (1992) |
|
found a combination of after-image feedback and IPS treatment to be opti- |
|
mal for congenital (including albinotic) nystagmus. |
|
Evans et al (1998) carried out an RCT of the combined treatment described |
|
by Mallett & Radnam (1992). They studied 38 subjects, which, according |
|
to a statistical sample size calculation, should have been enough for a clin- |
|
ically significant treatment effect to reach statistical significance. The |
|
visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) were assessed three times |
|
before undergoing treatment for 6 weeks and then once more after treat- |
|
ment. An improvement in VA occurred, but this was not significantly dif- |
|
ferent in the two groups (Fig. 18.2). The improvement in CS was greater in |
|
the experimental than in the control group but the difference failed to |
|
reach significance in most statistical tests. |
|
Evans et al’s (1998) RCT clearly demonstrates that the improvement in |
|
high-contrast VA of the group receiving the experimental treatment is not |
335 |
significantly different to the improvement in those receiving a placebo |
18 PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES
0.4
0.39
0.38
0.37
0.36
0.35
|
|
|
Initial VA |
Final VA |
|
|
|
Figure 18.3 Bar chart representing the improvement in LogMAR VA of the experimental |
|
|
|
|
group of Evans et al (1998). VA is in LogMAR units, so that smaller figures represent better |
|
|
|
|
VA. Note: This figure deliberately misrepresents the overall results of the study to illustrate |
|
|
|
|
the dangers of researching therapies for CN without using an RCT design (see text). |
|
|
|
|
(Adapted with permission from Evans et al 1998.) |
|
|
|
|
treatment. If we just look at the data for the experimental group, we can |
|
|
|
|
investigate what the result of the study would have been if it had been a |
|
|
|
|
non-controlled trial, like most other studies of treatments for nystagmus. |
|
|
|
|
Figure 18.3 illustrates the improvement in VA of the experimental group from |
|
|
|
|
the first VA measurement to the final, post-treatment, assessment. A matched |
|
|
|
|
pairs t-test on the preand post-treatment data in Figure 18.3 shows that the |
|
|
|
|
apparent improvement in VA is statistically significant (p 0.031). Yet Figure |
|
|
|
|
18.2 shows that this improvement is attributable to practice and placebo |
|
|
|
|
effects. This demonstrates the risks of research that does not use an RCT design |
|
|
|
|
and must raise questions about whether any safe conclusions can be drawn |
|
|
|
|
from research in this field that has not employed an RCT (Evans 2006b). |
|
|
|
|
Surgery |
|
|
|
|
Abadi & Whittle (1992) showed that, in carefully selected cases of congenital |
|
|
|
|
idiopathic nystagmus with an eccentric null zone, surgery to shift the null |
|
|
|
|
position to the primary position (Kestenbaum procedure) may be effective. A |
|
|
|
|
different approach, based on using a silicone band to create a new anatom- |
|
|
|
|
ical insertion for the recti muscles, may reduce the amplitude but has little |
|
|
|
|
effect on vision (Richman et al 1992). Successive publications on ‘null point |
|
|
|
|
surgery’ seem to recommend ever more surgery and Harris (1997a) recom- |
|
|
|
|
mended reserving this intervention for cases with significant symptoms. |
|
|
|
|
Another technique, ‘artificial divergence surgery’, has been used to reduce |
|
|
336 |
|
the effect of the medial rectus muscle, resulting in more adduction innerv- |
|
|
|
ation, which, in some cases, reduces the nystagmus (Spielmann 1994). Repka |
||
NYSTAGMUS |
18 |
|
(1999) reviewed various surgical approaches to nystagmus, which can be |
|
|
combined (Graf 2002). An additional recent technique is horizontal rectus |
|
|
tenotomy (Hertle et al 2003). A recent review notes that there is a lack of |
|
|
RCTs for any of these approaches (Evans 2006b). |
|
|
Botulinum toxin can be used as a temporary measure to investigate the |
|
|
likely effect of this type of procedure (Spielmann 1994). Botulinum toxin |
|
|
can also be injected into two or four recti muscles as a treatment but has |
|
|
to be repeated every 4 months and doubts have been raised over this inter- |
|
|
vention (Dell’Osso 1994, Repka 1999). |
|
|
Other treatment approaches |
|
|
Leigh et al (1988) used an electronic device to stabilize the retinal image |
|
|
and reduce oscillopsia in patients with acquired nystagmus due to neuro- |
|
|
logical disease. This can be used to calculate the power required for a tele- |
|
|
scopic contact lens system (high minus contact lens with high plus spectacle |
|
|
lens) that provides partial optical stabilization of the retinal image (Yaniglos & |
|
|
Leigh 1992). |
|
|
Pharmacological agents have been used to treat nystagmus, most com- |
|
|
monly acquired nystagmus (Grisham 1990, Richman et al 1992) and may |
|
|
also have a role in CN (Shery et al 2006). Other approaches include hypno- |
|
|
sis (Chase 1963), electrical or vibratory stimulation of the ophthalmic div- |
|
|
ision of the trigeminal nerve (Dell’Osso 1994, Sheth et al 1995) and visual |
|
|
stimuli designed from dynamical systems analysis (Abadi et al 1997). |
|
|
It was noted above that many people with CN suffer a worsening of their |
|
|
nystagmus and visual acuity when they are under stress (e.g. in academic |
|
|
examinations). The may be why the placebo effect seems to be so large in |
|
|
nystagmus. Hypnosis is ‘an empirically-validated, non-deceptive placebo’ |
|
|
(Kirsch 1996) and it is possible that this could be used as a sort of ‘focussed |
|
|
relaxation’ to help patients whose nystagmus is particularly troublesome |
|
|
in certain stressful situations. Once again though, it is stressed that there |
|
|
have been no RCTs of the approaches described in this ‘other treatments’ |
|
|
section (Evans 2006b). |
|
|
Counselling |
|
|
Three sorts of counselling can be helpful to patients with nystagmus. First, |
|
|
as is often the case after an appointment in a busy hospital department, |
|
|
patients are discharged with a diagnosis but with many unanswered ques- |
|
|
tions (Budge & Derbyshire 2005). If the diagnosis is clear then the commu- |
|
|
nity optometrist can explain what the diagnosis means. For example, a |
|
|
diagnosis of congenital idiopathic nystagmus does not mean that the infant |
|
|
is, or will go, blind. Although the nystagmus will always be present it usually |
|
|
reduces a little as the child ages (Harris 1997a) and the level of vision should |
|
|
be enough to allow the person to do most everyday activities, usually going |
|
|
to a normal school, although driving will probably not be possible. |
|
|
The second type of counselling is genetic counselling to discuss whether |
337 |
|
an underlying pathology or idiopathic nystagmus are likely to be passed on |
|
|





































































338




































340





