Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies 5th edition_Evans_2007
.pdf
|
17 |
|
PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES |
|
|
|
|
|
ophthalmoplegia. Ocular myositis can cause extraocular muscle inflamma- |
|
|
|
|
tion with resultant impairment of function. Kearns–Sayre ophthalmoplegia |
|
|
|
|
is a mitochondrial abnormality of extraocular muscles causing progressive |
|
|
|
|
external ophthalmoplegia and may be associated with cardiac defects. |
|
|
|
|
Mechanical disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duane’s retraction syndrome |
|
|
|
|
The characteristic feature of Duane’s syndrome is retraction of the globe on |
|
|
|
|
attempted adduction caused by co-contraction of the medial and lateral recti. |
|
|
|
|
There may also be an elevation or depression of the affected eye. DeRespinis |
|
|
|
|
et al (1993) felt that convergence insufficiency was also an invariable feature. |
|
|
|
|
Duane’s retraction syndrome occurs in approximately 1 in 50 patients with |
|
|
|
|
strabismus (Jampolsky 1999), is four times more common in females and |
|
|
|
|
both eyes are affected in about 20% of cases. It can be familial (Finlay 2000). |
|
|
|
|
Although Duane’s retraction syndrome has the characteristics of a |
|
|
|
|
mechanical restriction and is usually classified thus, the underlying cause |
|
|
|
|
is absent or partial development of the sixth nerve nucleus and nerve |
|
|
|
|
(Jampolsky 1999). |
|
|
|
|
Conventionally, the condition was classified into type A, restricted abduc- |
|
|
|
|
tion and slightly defective adduction; type B, restricted abduction and |
|
|
|
|
normal adduction; and type C, restricted adduction and slightly defective |
|
|
|
|
abduction. However, the alternative Huber’s classification (Appendix 13 and |
|
|
|
|
CD-ROM) appears to be becoming more common: |
|
|
|
|
(1) Type 1: marked limitation or absence of abduction with normal or |
|
|
|
|
slightly limited adduction; this is the most common type (78%; von |
|
|
|
|
Noorden 1996) and is invariably associated with an absence of the |
|
|
|
|
abducens nerve on the affected side (Kim & Hwang 2005). |
|
|
|
|
(2) Type 2: limited or absent adduction with normal or mildly limited |
|
|
|
|
abduction; this is the least common (7%) and the abducens nerve on |
|
|
|
|
the affected side is present (Kim & Hwang 2005). |
|
|
|
|
(3) Type 3: limitation or absence of both abduction and adduction |
|
|
|
|
(Appendix 13 and CD-ROM); this type affects 15% of cases (von Noorden |
|
|
|
|
1996) and is sometimes associated with an absence of the abducens |
|
|
|
|
nerve on the affected side (Kim & Hwang 2005). |
|
|
|
|
More complicated classifications have been proposed (Romero-Apis & |
|
|
|
|
Herrera-Gonzalez 1995) but the most straightforward approach is to simply |
|
|
|
|
describe the clinical characteristics. For example, ‘Duane’s syndrome of |
|
|
|
|
right eye with no abduction, normal adduction, retraction on adduction’. |
|
|
|
|
If this descriptive terminology is used in reports then the reader does not |
|
|
|
|
have to be familiar with whatever classification the writer uses. |
|
|
|
|
Jampolsky (1999) states that the condition results from a maldevelopment |
|
|
|
|
or injury to developing structures (absent or partial development) of the |
|
|
|
|
sixth nerve nucleus and nerve(s) in the fourth to eighth weeks of gestation. |
|
|
310 |
|
He argues that there is no credible evidence that the sixth nerve branches are |
|
|
|
redirected to innervate any of the third nerve muscles. However, the medial |
|
|
17 |
|
PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 17.7 Differential diagnosis of Brown’s syndrome and inferior |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
oblique palsy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factor |
Brown’s syndrome |
Inferior oblique palsy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prevalence |
Relatively common |
Relatively rare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incyclotropia |
Usually absent |
Present from unopposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ipsilateral superior oblique |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anomalous |
May not be present. |
Almost always present in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
head posture |
If present, main feature |
congenital cases. Head |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is chin lifted, but also |
tilted towards palsied side |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
head tilted towards |
and turned towards the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
involved side |
uninvolved side |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pattern strabismus |
Various reports of |
A-pattern esotropia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A or V patterns |
common, particularly in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bilateral cases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overaction of |
Absent |
Usually present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ipsilateral superior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oblique muscle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overaction of |
Usually absent |
Usually present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contralateral superior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rectus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bielschowsky head |
Usually negative |
Usually positive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tilt test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discomfort elevating |
Often present, may |
Absent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
affected eye when |
be actually painful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adducted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvement of |
May be present, |
Usually absent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elevation in adduction |
sometimes with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on repeated testing |
click |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forced duction test |
Marked mechanical |
No mechanical restriction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(definitive test) |
restriction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
extraocular muscle bellies are the primary site of the disease. During this stage |
|||||
|
|
|
|
it is technically a myogenic disorder but optometrists are more likely to see |
|||||
|
|
|
|
the disease during the inactive, fibrotic phase, which is characterized by a |
|||||
|
|
|
|
mechanical incomitancy. The condition is bilateral but can be asymmetrical, |
|||||
|
|
|
|
typically with a gradual onset of diplopia. The systemic and ocular signs are |
|||||
|
|
|
|
listed in Table 17.8. Rarely, the condition is associated with myasthenia |
|||||
|
|
|
|
gravis. Smoking is the most important risk factor for thyroid eye disease. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The severity of visual loss in thyroid eye disease can be graded according |
|||
|
|
|
|
to the mnemonic in Table 17.9 (Cawood et al 2004). Clearly these patients |
|||||
|
|
312 |
|
require medical attention (Cawood et al 2004) but they should also be |
|||||
|
|
|
monitored for compressive optic nerve damage and exposure keratitis |
||||||
17 PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES
Table 17.9 NOSPECS mnemonic for grading severity of thyroid eye disease |
||
|
|
|
Grade |
Mnemonic |
Description |
|
|
|
0 |
N |
No signs or symptoms |
1 |
O |
Only symptoms |
2 |
S |
Soft tissue involvement |
3 |
P |
Proptosis |
4 |
E |
Extraocular muscle involvement |
5 |
C |
Corneal exposure |
6 |
S |
Sight loss due to optic nerve involvements |
|
|
|
(biomicroscopy). If visual function is compromised (visual acuity or field loss) then the medical team should be notified, since medical, surgical or radio treatment for decompression of the orbit is indicated. These patients often respond well to relieving prisms (Ansons & Davis 2001, p 146). Regular monitoring is required as the prism strength may need to be changed frequently. Some success with botulinum toxin has been reported.
Blow-out fracture
This is an acquired anomaly resulting from a blow on the front of the face, for example from a cricket ball or from falling on the face. The diplopia usually results from direct muscle injury (Pitts 1996) but can be associated with a fracture of the thin orbital wall. In particular, orbital fascial tissue can become trapped in the maxillary sinus, preventing the eye from elevating above the horizontal. The motility defect varies depending on the site of the lesion but restriction of elevation is most common (Spector 1993). There may be retraction of the eye as it tries to turn up; this can be seen from the side. The condition can resolve spontaneously or may require surgery (Pitts 1996).
Iatrogenic incomitancies
Paralytic strabismus can occur following cataract surgery, usually affecting a vertical rectus muscle. The pathogenesis is unclear but may be local myotoxicity from the anaesthetic agent (Lee 1994). A restrictive incomitancy can also occur from filtering devices used to treat glaucoma (Wright 1994). The device typically causes a vertical deviation, sometimes with the appearance of an acquired Brown’s syndrome. The patient may report confusion rather than diplopia, possibly because of a field defect (Wright 1994). Incomitancies can also develop after retinal detachment surgery where a scleral buckle is used.
|
|
|
Other mechanical incomitancies |
|
|
|
Strabismus fixus is an extremely rare condition in which one or both eyes |
|
|
|
are anchored, typically in a position of extreme adduction. This is believed |
|
|
|
to result from a fibrous tightening of the medial rectus muscle (von Noorden |
|
314 |
|
1996). Strabismus fixus of the lateral rectus can also occur (Caloroso & |
|
|
Rouse 1993, p 39). Fibrosis of the extraocular muscles is an extremely rare |
INCOMITANT DEVIATIONS |
17 |
|
condition, which can be inherited, involving fibrosis of one or all of the |
|
|
extraocular muscles (von Noorden 1996). Typically, there is downward fix- |
|
|
ation of one or both eyes, with marked ptosis and chin elevation. |
|
|
Supranuclear and internuclear disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
Internuclear ophthalmoplegia |
|
|
Internuclear ophthalmoplegia results from a lesion in the medial longitu- |
|
|
dinal fasciculus between the third and fourth nerve nuclei. It results in poor |
|
|
adduction of the eye on the affected side and abducting nystagmus in the |
|
|
contralateral eye. Convergence is often, but not always, intact. Subtle cases |
|
|
can be detecting by having the patient make rapid horizontal eye move- |
|
|
ments to show the slowness of adduction. Bilateral internuclear ophthal- |
|
|
moplegia in the young is almost always associated with multiple sclerosis. |
|
|
Unilateral cases are usually due to a vascular or ischaemic lesion (Spalton |
|
|
et al 1984). |
|
|
Gaze palsies |
|
|
Gaze palsies, arising from supranuclear disorders, do not necessarily manifest |
|
|
a deviation between the two visual axes so may not meet the definition of an |
|
|
incomitancy but are nonetheless included in this chapter. These can occur |
|
|
due to lesions in the frontal motor centre, in the gaze centres in the pons or |
|
|
in the interconnecting pathways. There is seldom diplopia and the eyes |
|
|
move together in most directions of gaze. In one direction, the eyes cannot |
|
|
move reflexly to take up fixation or, more rarely, cannot follow a moving |
|
|
target (pursuit palsy). In lateral gaze palsy, the two eyes will not move beyond |
|
|
the midline. In vertical gaze palsy, movements above and/or below the hori- |
|
|
zontal are restricted. Parkinson’s disease can be associated with restrictions |
|
|
of vertical gaze. New or changing gaze palsies should be referred: possible |
|
|
aetiologies include neoplasms and emboli. |
|
|
Parinaud’s syndrome |
|
|
Parinaud’s syndrome is also known as dorsal midbrain syndrome. It is char- |
|
|
acterized by: gaze palsy for elevation or depression or both for saccades |
|
|
and later pursuit, convergence retraction nystagmus, upper eyelid retraction, |
|
|
large pupils with light-near dissociation, and papilloedema. Causes include |
|
|
tumours of the pineal gland and vascular accidents or trauma. |
|
|
Skew deviation |
|
|
This is a transient vertical divergence where one eye is elevated and the other |
|
|
is depressed. The deviation may be comitant or may vary in different posi- |
|
|
tions of gaze. The main differential diagnosis is from acquired fourth nerve |
|
|
palsy, which will be associated with a cyclodeviation. Cyclodeviations may |
|
|
(von Noorden 1996, p 415) or may not (Lee 1999) be present with skew devi- |
|
|
ation. Skew deviation can be intermittent but usually occurs in association |
|
|
with brain stem, cerebellar, or vestibular disease (Lee 1999). Skew deviation |
315 |
|
is usually accompanied by binocular torsion, torticollis, and a tilt in the |
|
|
|
17 |
|
PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES |
|
|
|
|
|
subjective visual vertical; this constellation of findings has been termed the |
|
|
|
|
ocular tilt reaction (Brodsky et al 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Other disorders |
|
|
|
|
Pattern deviations (alphabet patterns; pattern strabismus; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A- and V-syndromes) |
|
|
|
|
Quite commonly, cases are encountered in which the patient appears to be |
|
|
|
|
fairly comitant on motility testing in the six cardinal positions of gaze but |
|
|
|
|
the horizontal deviation is seen to increase or decrease with the eyes in |
|
|
|
|
upor down-gaze. The simplest examples of these cases are the A-syndrome, |
|
|
|
|
in which the eyes are relatively more convergent in up-gaze, and the |
|
|
|
|
V-syndrome, in which the eyes are relatively more convergent in down- |
|
|
|
|
gaze. V-syndrome is about twice as common as A-syndrome (von Noorden |
|
|
|
|
1996). An estimated one in five patients with strabismus may be expected |
|
|
|
|
to have an A or V pattern (von Noorden 1996, p 383; Biglan 1999), and |
|
|
|
|
subtle variants of the conditions are very common in ‘normal’ heteropho- |
|
|
|
|
ria. Von Noorden (1996, pp 376–383) discussed the aetiology of the con- |
|
|
|
|
dition, concluding that several factors play a role, including dysfunction |
|
|
|
|
of the oblique muscles and various anatomical factors, including the |
|
|
|
|
configuration and rotation of the orbit (Biglan 1999). |
|
|
|
|
Both A- and V-syndromes can be present in patients with exoor eso- |
|
|
|
|
deviations. For example, in A esotropia the esotropia increases in up-gaze and |
|
|
|
|
decreases in down-gaze. In V exotropia the deviation increases in up-gaze |
|
|
|
|
and reduces in down-gaze. Other variants also exist, although they are less |
|
|
|
|
common. For example, in X syndrome the eyes may be straight in the pri- |
|
|
|
|
mary position and exotropic in up-gaze and down-gaze. Other variants |
|
|
|
|
include Y pattern and λ pattern. It is not surprising that the generic terms |
|
|
|
|
‘pattern strabismus’ or ‘alphabetic pattern’ have been coined. |
|
|
|
|
These patterns may be present as congenital anomalies or may accompany |
|
|
|
|
an acquired strabismus, particularly where the oblique muscles are affected. |
|
|
|
|
Anomalous head postures are common. The presence of A or V patterns can |
|
|
|
|
improve the prognosis because binocular single vision may be developed |
|
|
|
|
or maintained in upor down-gaze. However, most pattern deviations do |
|
|
|
|
not require treatment (Ansons & Davis 2001, p 336). When treatment is |
|
|
|
|
required, some authors have found success with oblique prisms but others |
|
|
|
|
do not advocate this approach (von Noorden 1996, pp 385–386). Surgical |
|
|
|
|
approaches are also available (von Noorden 1996, pp 383–389; Biglan |
|
|
|
|
1999, pp 209–214). |
|
|
|
|
Pattern deviations can be diagnosed with cover testing in upand down- |
|
|
|
|
gaze and, more accurately, with a Hess or Lees screen. Von Noorden (1996, |
|
|
|
|
p 384) suggested criteria for diagnosis: a V pattern with a difference of 15 |
|
|
|
|
or more from upto down-gaze and an A pattern with a difference of 10 . |
|
|
|
|
Several disorders are commonly associated with pattern deviations: infan- |
|
|
|
|
tile esotropia syndrome, Duane’s retraction syndrome, Brown’s syndrome, |
|
|
316 |
|
acquired fourth nerve palsy and thyroid eye disease (Ansons & Davis 2001, |
|
|
|
pp 334–335). |
|
|
INCOMITANT DEVIATIONS |
17 |
||
Superior oblique myokymia |
|
|
||
Benign superior oblique myokymia is an episodic, small-amplitude, nystag- |
|
|
||
moid intorsion and depression of one eye, accompanied by visual shim- |
|
|
||
mer and oscillopsia (Case study 17.1). The condition was originally called |
|
|
||
unilateral rotary nystagmus (Plager 1999). The onset is in adulthood and the |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
symptoms are ‘most annoying’, while the ‘diagnosis is often missed’ (von |
|
|
||
Noorden 1996, p 456). Episodes usually last from 20 seconds to several |
|
|
||
minutes and can be triggered by physical activity (von Noorden 1996, |
|
|
||
p 456) and fatigue and stress (Plager 1999). The prevalence of this condi- |
|
|
||
tion does not appear to be quoted in the literature. |
|
|
||
Superior oblique myokymia is usually benign but there have been at |
|
|
||
least two cases of association with a posterior fossa tumour (von Noorden |
|
|
||
1996). Plager (1999) felt that neuroimaging was unnecessary, unless there |
|
|
||
were other neurological complaints. |
|
|
||
Although the precise aetiology is unclear (von Noorden 1996, p 456), |
|
|
||
superior oblique myokymia may be the result of regeneration (Plager 1999) |
|
|
||
after prior clinical or subclinical injury to the trochlear nerve (Mehta & |
|
|
||
Demer 1994). Medical treatments have been found, as with Case study 17.1, |
|
|
||
to be generally disappointing (von Noorden 1996, p 456; Plager 1999); |
|
|
||
although promising results from oral gabapentin have been reported in |
|
|
||
two cases (Tomsak et al 2002). Surgical approaches are sometimes success- |
|
|
||
ful, although second operations may be required (von Noorden 1996). |
|
|
||
Inferior oblique overaction |
|
|
||
Inferior oblique overaction is a common sequel to an early onset interrup- |
|
|
||
tion to binocularity, typically infantile esotropia syndrome (Koc et al |
|
|
||
2003, Brodsky 2005). It is often accompanied by latent nystagmus and/or |
|
|
||
dissociated vertical deviation. |
|
|
||
|
Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Considerable attention has been given in this chapter to the diagnosis of |
|
|
||
conditions requiring medical attention. This is obviously the first priority |
|
|
||
in the interest of the patient. The number of patients who have incomi- |
|
|
||
tant deviations as an early sign of disease requiring urgent medical atten- |
|
|
||
tion is not large, and many of them will take medical advice in the first |
|
|
||
place. This means that the largest number of incomitant deviations likely |
|
|
||
to be seen in primary eyecare practice will be long-standing deviations, |
|
|
||
and most of these will already have had medical attention. Therefore, the |
|
|
||
question that arises is whether there is anything further that can be done |
|
|
||
in these long-standing cases. Incomitant deviations do not respond at all |
|
|
||
well to eye exercises. Very occasionally, congenital conditions in children |
|
|
||
may be helped by exercises to extend the area of the binocular field over |
|
|
||
which there is binocular vision, or to re-establish it when it has broken |
317 |
|
||
down due to general ill health. In the latter case, the patient may suddenly |
|
|||
|
17 |
|
PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASE STUDY 17.1 Ref. F6155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND: 47-year-old businessman referred by neurologist to |
|
|
|
|
|
optometrist to investigate vertical diplopia and photosensitivity. Possible history |
|
|
|
|
|
of binocular anomaly at age 9 years. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOMS: For the last 18 months, he has experienced momentary vertical |
|
|
|
|
|
diplopia at some time most days; people who are with him do not notice any |
|
|
|
|
|
abnormalities. Headaches, particularly with office work. Reading is blurred, |
|
|
|
|
|
unstable and tiring; patient has given up reading for pleasure. Two |
|
|
|
|
|
ophthalmologists diagnosed superior oblique myokymia: one discharged |
|
|
|
|
|
patient, the other tried medical treatment, to no avail. |
|
|
|
|
|
CLINICAL FINDINGS: Minimal myopia and early presbyopia. At distance and |
|
|
|
|
|
near, dissociation testing revealed 2 R hyperphoria with same aligning prism on |
|
|
|
|
|
Mallett unit. Motility appeared normal but Lees screen revealed mild underaction |
|
|
|
|
|
of right superior oblique muscle, confirmed by Scobee’s three-step test (Parks |
|
|
|
|
|
inconclusive) and double Maddox rod test. |
|
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT: Prescribed distance spectacles and near spectacles, both with |
|
|
|
|
|
vertical prism. |
|
|
|
|
|
FOLLOW-UP 5 WEEKS LATER: Virtually no vertical diplopia or headaches, |
|
|
|
|
|
reading much easier. |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMENT: It seems likely that the patient had a long-standing superior |
|
|
|
|
|
oblique paresis, with secondary superior oblique myokymia. The comitancy had |
|
|
|
|
|
spread so that it was possible to correct the vertical deviation with a prism that |
|
|
|
|
|
alleviated the symptoms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
experience double vision, which may be remedied by orthoptic exercises if |
|
|
|
|
|
it is established that the general condition has cleared. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patients with strabismus with an onset in childhood will have suppression |
|
|
|
|
or HARC that prevents diplopia over most of the visual field. There may be |
|
|
|
|
|
some diplopia in one peripheral part of the motor field. Usually it is better not |
|
|
|
|
|
to disturb this adapted or partially adapted state. If one eye has been neglected |
|
|
|
|
|
or has had a blurred image for many years, correcting the refractive error can |
|
|
|
|
|
produce troublesome diplopia. It may be better to give a balancing lens or a |
|
|
|
|
|
blurring lens to maintain the status quo. In some cases, correction may be |
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate, particularly in children, if it is likely that some binocular vision |
|
|
|
|
|
can be restored, perhaps with relieving prisms. However, this is a difficult pro- |
|
|
|
|
|
cedure and should only be attempted with great caution. Once diplopia is cre- |
|
|
|
|
|
ated, it is difficult for the patient to revert to suppression. Very occasionally, |
|
|
|
|
|
the sensory adaptation in these incomitant deviations seems to break down |
|
|
|
|
|
spontaneously and we are presented with a patient complaining of diplopia |
|
|
|
|
|
and a long-standing deviation not due to recently acquired pathology. The |
|
|
|
|
|
management of intractable diplopia is discussed on page 227. |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
It has been suggested that some patients with acquired incomitant devi- |
|
|
|
ations benefit from monovision, where each eye is given its own ‘domain’ |
||






313






























