Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies 5th edition_Evans_2007
.pdf
15 PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES
Esotropia
Acquired non-accommodative esotropia is characterized by: sudden onset usually between 6 and 24 months of age, normal binocular vision before onset, constant comitant deviation between 30–70 , normal AC/A ratio, negligible effect of refractive correction on the angle, positive family history and normal neurological health (Frane et al 2000).
Some cases occur following a childhood febrile illnesses. These cases of strabismus can usually be treated by correcting any refractive error and strengthening the fusional reserves by the type of exercise described in Chapter 10. These patients have had binocular vision prior to the illness and if they are seen soon after the recovery in general health the binocular vision can often be restored. However, care must be taken to be sure that the strabismus was not present before the illness, as parents are not always certain about this.
In some cases, the onset of the strabismus may follow emotional trauma. These cases are very much more difficult to treat as the traumatic scars do not have any optometric treatment and recovery from them may be very slow. Caution should be exercised before any treatment is given. A refractive correction and fusional reserve exercises may help, but the treatment can be very protracted. Patients in heroin detoxification become less exo/more eso at distance and this can trigger acute comitant esotropia (Firth et al 2004).
Some esotropia may apparently occur spontaneously in children over the age of 1 year. A careful check for pathology must be carried out. This requires an ophthalmoscopic check for the white patches on the fundus indicative of retinoblastoma. This is rare but serious and, particularly where central areas of the fundus are involved, a strabismus may be the first sign. It usually occurs before the age of 4 years. Other neurological disorders usually produce non-comitant deviations so that a motility test is essential. A sixth nerve palsy is the most likely. This will show as a restriction of abduction, and an increase in the angle of the strabismus in distance vision and as the patient looks towards the affected side (Ch. 17).
Non-accommodative esotropia with a spontaneous onset can occur without such pathology and the aetiology may be an idiopathic increase in tonic convergence (Frane et al 2000). It often occurs intermittently at first. If it can be detected at this stage, developing divergent fusional reserves can help to check it. If there is a significant anisometropia that may lead to amblyopia, this should be corrected. Although the strabismus is non-accommoda- tive, some cases benefit from bifocals, which, even with a normal AC/A ratio, may correct the deviation at near. These are prescribed in the same way as for convergence excess deviations. Clearly, the bifocal will not help distance vision, but normal binocular vision at near is better than no binocular vision at all. This also makes eye exercises easier as the patient can build on the binocular vision at near.
Another type of non-accommodative esotropia that can occur spontaneously is a form of divergence weakness esotropia, typically in an elderly
258patient with a sudden onset of horizontal diplopia during distance vision. This has been termed divergence paralysis, although whether divergence is
OVERVIEW OF THE MANAGEMENT OF STRABISMUS |
15 |
||
an active process remains controversial (Lim 1999). The condition should |
|
|
|
be differentially diagnosed from a bilateral sixth nerve palsy (where an |
|
|
|
incomitancy will be detected on motility testing) but still requires referral |
|
|
|
to investigate possible neurological causes. |
|
|
|
Von Graefe and later Bielschowsky described a type of acute-onset |
|
|
|
esotropia that is associated with high myopia. It usually occurs in young |
|
|
|
adults at distance and then at near, and is associated with diplopia (von |
|
|
|
Noorden 1996). Usually this is comitant (rarely, there is limited abduc- |
|
|
|
tion), unlike another type of esotropia associated with very high myopia |
|
|
|
( 15 D or more) in which there appears to be a limitation of motility in all |
|
|
|
directions of gaze (von Noorden 1996). Indeed, acute onset esotropia in |
|
|
|
adults was reported to be associated with some degree of myopia in nine out |
|
|
|
of ten cases, but all cases regained stereoacuity after surgery (Spierer 2003). |
|
|
|
When non-accommodative esotropia has become established for several |
|
|
|
years, non-surgical treatment may not be successful. Prism relief may assist |
|
|
|
(Ch. 14). Extraocular muscle surgery may be indicated when 20 or more |
|
|
|
of esotropia remains after full correction of the refractive error or if optical |
|
|
|
correction has no effect on the angle (Frane et al 2000). The chances of |
|
|
|
achieving stereopsis after surgery for esotropia improve if the onset is after |
|
|
|
the second year, but coexisting hypertropia worsens the prognosis (Kora |
|
|
|
et al 1997). |
|
|
|
Exotropia |
|
|
|
Exotropia (constant or intermittent) affects about 1% of children by the age |
|
|
|
of 11 years, with diagnosis most common at the ages of 3 years and 9 years |
|
|
|
(Govindan et al 2005). The most common form of exotropia (Mohney & |
|
|
|
Huffaker 2003) to occur under the age of 19 years is intermittent exotropia |
|
|
|
(50%); other common types are exotropia associated with neurological |
|
|
|
abnormalities (21%; mostly cerebral palsy or developmental delay), con- |
|
|
|
vergence weakness (12%) and sensory exotropia (10%; mostly optic nerve |
|
|
|
hypoplasia or cataract). Intermittent exotropia is more likely to be associ- |
|
|
|
ated with neurological disease (e.g. developmental delay, cerebral palsy, |
|
|
|
attention deficit disorder) if it is of the convergence weakness type rather |
|
|
|
than the other types listed below (Phillips et al 2005). |
|
|
|
The management options for intermittent exotropia were reviewed by |
|
|
|
Coffey et al (1992) and negative lens therapy often achieves long-term suc- |
|
|
|
cess (Caltrider & Jampolsky 1983). For many patients with intermittent |
|
|
|
exotropia, the deviation reduces in angle and/or changes to an exophoria |
|
|
|
over time, and this seems to happen regardless of the management of the |
|
|
|
case (Rutstein & Corliss 2003). In contrast, another study found that more |
|
|
|
than 50% of children with intermittent exotropia have an increase of |
|
|
|
10 or more within 20 years of their diagnosis (Nusz et al 2006). |
|
|
|
Divergent strabismus can be classified under four headings, there being |
|
|
|
a different management and prognosis for each type. |
|
|
|
(1) Divergence excess This presents typically as an intermittent divergent |
|
259 |
|
|
|
||
strabismus for distance vision only. It becomes most apparent during periods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES |
|
|
|
|
of inattention and day-dreaming, and is worse during ill health. Patients |
|
|
|
are photophobic and bright light can cause the strabismus to occur (Eustace |
|
|
|
et al 1973, Wiggins & von Noorden 1990). Most patients are female and |
|
|
|
there is little refractive error. Because of its intermittent nature, the acuities |
|
|
|
are generally good and nearly equal. There are usually no symptoms as there |
|
|
|
are sensory adaptations when the eye is deviated. Patients usually seek |
|
|
|
advice because some relative tells them that one eye sometimes deviates |
|
|
|
(see also Ch. 8). Where the V syndrome exists, optometric treatment may |
|
|
|
be more difficult. |
|
|
|
Divergence excess is further discussed in Chapter 8, where the distinc- |
|
|
|
tion is drawn between true and simulated divergence excess. It is also |
|
|
|
noted in Chapter 8 that some authors have suggested that occlusion may |
|
|
|
be an effective treatment for intermittent exotropia, although there have |
|
|
|
been no randomized controlled trials. |
|
|
|
The condition is usually improved by eye exercises designed to overcome |
|
|
|
sensory adaptations and to build up the convergent fusional reserves. Also |
|
|
|
useful are exercises to teach an appreciation of physiological diplopia and |
|
|
|
the movement of the diplopic images during changes of fixation from near |
|
|
|
to distance and back. If the patient has adequate accommodation and a mod- |
|
|
|
erate to high AC/A ratio, it may be possible to help this deviation refractively |
|
|
|
by prescribing distance glasses that are overminused with a near addition |
|
|
|
(e.g. 2.00 DS at distance with a 2.00 add at near) to prevent the patient |
|
|
|
developing an eso-deviation at near (Mallett 1988b). |
|
|
|
(2) Near vision exotropia This is also called ‘convergence weakness type’ |
|
|
|
strabismus. The onset is usually in the mid-teens when binocular vision |
|
|
|
breaks down for near fixation. It seems that binocular vision has been |
|
|
|
maintained by the high convergence impulses that exist in children, but |
|
|
|
in these cases it cannot be sustained for near when these impulses lessen. |
|
|
|
Binocular vision may also break down for distance vision but the angle of |
|
|
|
the strabismus is greater for near. These patients complain of symptoms |
|
|
|
including diplopia. They are usually myopic and have equal acuities. |
|
|
|
If the angle is over 20 , it is not possible to restore binocular vision by |
|
|
|
optometric methods and the patient should be referred for a surgeon’s opin- |
|
|
|
ion. In other cases, treatment may not be lasting. The approach is to correct |
|
|
|
any significant refractive error and increase the convergent fusional reserves. |
|
|
|
With smaller angles, prism relief is also useful. Some patients with adequate |
|
|
|
amplitude of accommodation respond well to the prescribing of reading |
|
|
|
glasses that are ‘overminused’. The minimum ‘negative add’ to transform the |
|
|
|
near exotropia into a compensated exophoria should be prescribed and |
|
|
|
the effect of this on distance ocular motor balance should be investigated. |
|
|
|
Care must be taken to ensure that the glasses do not cause an eso-deviation |
|
|
|
for distance vision or that they are only worn for reading. An alternative is |
|
|
|
to prescribe executive bifocals and glaze them upside down (p 12). |
|
260 |
|
(3) Basic exotropia In these cases, there is a constant divergent strabismus |
|
|
of approximately equal angle for distance and near vision. It is often |
|
|
|
|
|
OVERVIEW OF THE MANAGEMENT OF STRABISMUS |
15 |
||
alternating with nearly equal acuities. As the onset is likely to be early in |
|
|
|
life, there are no symptoms. |
|
|
|
Any significant refractive error is corrected, following the general guide |
|
|
|
of maximum minus or minimum plus. In children young enough to have |
|
|
|
an adequate amplitude of accommodation, the effect of prescribing ‘nega- |
|
|
|
tive additions’ to the prescription (overminusing or underplussing) can be |
|
|
|
tried, as described in Chapter 14. Exercises for simultaneous binocular |
|
|
|
vision may also be required. Divergent strabismus is sometimes accompan- |
|
|
|
ied by a vertical component, which will make eye exercises more difficult. |
|
|
|
Patients may be better with surgical correction for cosmetic reasons. |
|
|
|
(4) Consecutive exotropia There are a number of circumstances in which a |
|
|
|
convergent strabismus may become divergent. It is sometimes seen in |
|
|
|
patients who had accommodative esotropia on which an operation was per- |
|
|
|
formed in early childhood. No spectacles have been worn but in adolescence |
|
|
|
or adulthood these patients develop symptoms due to the hypermetropia. |
|
|
|
Correction of the refractive error relieves the facultative accommodation |
|
|
|
and a divergent strabismus with diplopia occurs. A partial correction and |
|
|
|
convergent fusional reserve exercises can sometimes help to maintain |
|
|
|
binocular vision. Other cases need further surgery. |
|
|
|
Vertical strabismus |
|
|
|
About 1 in 400 people develop vertical strabismus by the age of 18 years |
|
|
|
(Tollefson et al 2006). When vertical strabismus presents in adulthood it is |
|
|
|
usually the result of an incomitant deviation (Ch. 17), usually fourth nerve |
|
|
|
palsy (Tollefson et al 2006). This is a major reason why nearly 90% of cases |
|
|
|
of vertical strabismus are hypertropia, and hypotropia is very likely to be |
|
|
|
Brown’s syndrome (Tollefson et al 2006) (Ch. 17). Hypertropia can rarely |
|
|
|
be exacerbated by convergence and accommodation (Thomas et al 2005). |
|
|
|
Spasm of the near reflex |
|
|
|
Aetiology |
|
|
|
The term spasm of the near reflex (Rutstein 2000) is more accurate than its |
|
|
|
synonym, convergent spasm (Bishop 2001), since all three components of the |
|
|
|
near triad (convergence, accommodation, miosis) are typically involved |
|
|
|
(Rutstein 2000). It usually has a psychogenic origin but can be organic |
|
|
|
(Bishop 2001), when there may be other clinical findings such as nystag- |
|
|
|
mus or papilloedema (Rutstein 2000). |
|
|
|
Investigation |
|
|
|
Symptoms include headache, visual discomfort, dizziness and print blur- |
|
|
|
ring, doubling, becoming smaller or merging. A cycloplegic refraction is |
|
|
|
indicated to rule out latent hypermetropia (Box 2.1). The condition is |
|
|
|
characterized by intermittent and variable episodes of esotropia, pseudomy- |
|
261 |
|
opia and pupillary miosis. There may also be limited abduction and the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MICROTROPIA 16
the cover is removed from both the eyes, the eye that was last covered will be seen to return to the microtropia position. It is as if a heterophoric movement is superimposed on the strabismus. The ‘pseudoheterophoria’ may be larger and more obvious than the microtropia, which may not show at all on the cover test. This cover test recovery movement can be described as an anomalous fusional movement. Mallett (1988a) felt that these cases did not have a strabismus but in fact had a heterophoria with normal retinal correspondence (NRC) and a gross fixation disparity. This fixation disparity is much larger than that normally found in heterophoria but does not cause diplopia because of a large foveal suppression area in the strabismic eye. Pickwell (1981) suggested a sequence of events that linked these features and could explain the development of at least some cases of microtropia. He argued that a decompensating heterophoria leads to an increasing fixation disparity, which in time becomes associated with an enlargement of Panum’s area and an increase in the deviation. This results in a microtropia with identity. It is interesting that Pickwell suggested an enlargement of Panum’s area, as had Goersch (1979), in contrast to the foveal suppression that Mallett proposed and that is detected with the Mallett foveal suppression test (Jennings 1996; see Fig. 4.7).
(8)Stereopsis. A low grade of stereopsis has been reported in microtropia (Okuda et al 1977), although it is not always detected with standard clinical tests (Pickwell & Jenkins 1978). Cooper & Feldman (1978) argued that all cases of strabismus, including microtropia, show subnormal performance at random dot stereopsis tests.
(9)Symptoms. There are usually no symptoms and a good cosmesis.
Investigation and diagnosis
The investigation and diagnosis of microtropia ensue from a full routine eye examination, but the following aspects are particularly useful in the detection of this condition. These are summarized in Box 16.1.
Amblyopia
The presence of amblyopia in one eye is usually the first clue that |
|
microtropia may be found. The amblyopic eye usually shows the crowding |
|
phenomenon referred to in Chapter 13, i.e. single letter acuity is better than |
|
line acuity. The foveal scotoma may also result in patients missing out letters |
|
when reading lines of Snellen letters, or they may read the line more easily |
|
backwards (see Fig. 13.1). |
|
The patient should be tested for eccentric fixation (Ch. 13 and Appendix 6). |
|
Eccentric fixation in microtropia is usually parafoveal and slightly nasal and |
|
superior to the fovea in microesotropia. The other diagnostic features of stra- |
265 |
bismic amblyopia are summarized in Table 13.1. |
16 |
PICKWELL’S BINOCULAR VISION ANOMALIES |
|
Box 16.1 Algorithm to assist in the diagnosis of |
|
microtropia |
|
All the following characteristics must be present for a diagnosis of microtropia |
|
Angle 10 |
|
Amblyopic eye with morphoscopic acuity at least 1 line worse than dominant |
|
eye, unless alternating microtropia (rare) |
|
Eccentric fixation (Ch. 13), unless rare alternating microtropia |
|
HARC detected by Bagolini striated lens test or by modified Mallett unit (Ch. 14) |
|
And at least three of the following characteristics should be present |
|
Angle 6 |
|
Anisometropia 1.50 D |
|
Microtropia with identity: angle of anomaly angle of eccentric fixation, so |
|
no movement when dominant eye is covered |
|
Monofixational syndrome: apparent phoria movement on cover test |
|
Motor fusion: ‘pseudofusional reserves’ can be measured |
|
Stereopsis of 100 or more on contoured tests such as Titmus circles or |
|
Randot contoured circles |
|
Four-prism dioptre test shows positive response |
|
Lang’s one-sided scotoma demonstrated with Amsler charts |
|
Cover test |
|
For microtropia without identity, the diagnosis is usually made on the |
|
basis of a positive unilateral cover test result of between 1 and 10 . But as |
|
explained above, microtropia with identity is unlikely to be detected as a |
|
strabismic movement with the cover test. There may be an apparent |
|
heterophoria movement when the cover is removed and this could result |
|
in the microtropia being missed. |
|
Four prism dioptre test |
|
In this test (Irvine 1948), a 4 base-out prism is placed before one eye and |
|
the eye movements are observed. The typical response in normal eyes |
|
(Ciuffreda & Tannen 1995) is a small initial vergence movement (which |
|
may not be seen) followed by a conjugate saccade (version movement) and |
|
then a symmetric vergence movement. The theory behind the test (Frantz |
|
et al 1992) is that, in microtropia, if the prism is placed before the strabismic |
266 |
eye the image will move within the suppression area, and there will be no |
movement of either eye. If the prism is placed before the non-microtropic |
MICROTROPIA 16
eye, both eyes will make the initial version movement but the microtropic eye will fail to make the subsequent vergence movement. The test should only work if the patient is fixating an angular, isolated target on a large featureless background. If this is not the case (e.g. if the patient fixates a letter chart), other detail in the field of view will also appear to move, not just the fixation target. This artefact probably explains much of the confusion that has arisen from this test.
In some cases where there is amblyopia in one eye and no movement on the cover test it is important to differentiate microtropia from organic amblyopia. It is possible that a central scotoma in organic amblyopia could cause a 4 test result similar to that in microtropia. In these cases, it may be useful to occlude the good eye and repeat the 4 base-out test monocularly. If there is a large pathological scotoma, as in many cases of organic amblyopia, then there will be no monocular response to the prism. Because any monocular suppression area in a microtropic eye is likely to be lighter than the larger suppression area that occurs under binocular viewing, a microtropic eye should make a version movement to a 4 lens that is introduced monocularly.
Although the 4 base-out test has been proposed as a diagnostic test for microtropia, the test often gives atypical responses, particularly in esophoric patients where the 4 base-out may correct the eso-deviation (Romano & von Noorden 1969). Frantz et al (1992) also advised caution in using this test. They found test–retest repeatability to be low and that normal and microtropic children and adults exhibit many atypical responses. I speculate that this may be because too little attention has been paid to the test target that is used.
Harmonious anomalous retinal correspondence
The Bagolini lens test or Mallett modified OXO test will show the response typical of HARC (Ch. 12). The HARC is usually deeply ingrained and will require a neutral density filter value of 1.0 log unit or more to suppress the Bagolini streak.
Amsler charts
The scotoma may show on the Amsler charts or as a disturbance of a page of print (p 195] and Appendix 6).
Stereopsis
This will depend on the type of test used. The TNO test measures random |
|
dot stereopsis and the patient is unlikely to do better than 2000 of arc, |
|
whereas the result from the Randot or Titmus stereotest circles, which |
|
measure contoured stereopsis, may be as high as 100 of arc (Stidwill 1998). |
|
Griffin & Grisham (1995) state that in microtropia central stereopsis is |
267 |
absent or greatly reduced, especially with random dot targets. |































262





