Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma_Jeremic, Pitz_2008
.pdf
|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma |
23 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
table 3.4. Clinical characteristics at presentation in 64 patients with ONSM |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptor |
Present |
Absent |
Unknown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right eye |
30 (51.7%) |
(excluding bilateral disease ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Left eye |
28 (48.3%) |
(excluding bilateral disease ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both eyes |
6 (9.4%) |
|
|
|
|
Proptosis |
23 (37.7%) |
38 |
3 |
|
|
Nerve head edema |
22 (43.1 %) |
29 |
13 |
|
|
APD |
56 (93.3%) |
4 |
4 |
|
|
Motility abnormality |
19 (30.2%) |
44 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shunt vessels |
4* |
(Likely underreported) |
|
|
|
* One additional patient developed shunt vessels one year after diagnosis. APD = afferent pupillary defect.
From Table 3, Turbin RE, Thompson CR, Kennerdell JS, Cockerham KP, Kupersmith MJ (2002) A long- |
|
|||||||||||||
term visual outcome comparison in patients with optic nerve sheath meningioma managed with observa- |
|
|||||||||||||
tion, surgery, radiotherapy, or surgery and radiotherapy. Ophthalmology 109(5):890–899 |
|
|
||||||||||||
table 3.5. Initial and final visual data in 64 patients with primary ONSM |
PROOFS |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 to 0.5 |
|
0.4 to 0.05 |
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Less than 0.05 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial visual acuity (ratio) |
36 (56.3%) |
|
8 |
|
|
t |
|
20 (31.3%) |
|
|
|
|||
|
(12.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final visual acuity (ratio) |
18 (28.1%) |
|
10 |
E |
|
|
|
36 (56.3%) |
|
|
|
|||
|
(15.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
0 |
|
R |
|
1 |
|
|
|
>0.3 |
<0.3 |
|
Unknown |
|
Initial color vision* |
29 (51.8%) |
R10 (17.9%) |
|
|
20 (35.7%) |
36 (64.3%) |
|
8 |
||||||
Final color vision* |
CO |
6 |
(11.1%) |
|
|
10 (18.5%) |
44 (81.5%) |
|
10 |
|||||
42 (77.8%) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
N |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
Unknown |
Initial field grade† |
u6 (9.7%) |
|
20 |
(32.3%) |
|
|
10 (16.1%) |
20 (32.3%) |
6 (9.7%) |
2 |
||||
Final field grade† |
5 (8.1 %) |
|
8 |
(12.9%) |
|
|
10 (16.1%) |
13 (21.0%) |
26 (41.9%) |
2 |
||||
*Color vision presented as decimal ratio of number of correct Ishihara color plates divided by total number of plates tested, excluding control plate. 0 = no plate correct, 0.5 = one half of color plates tested correctly. Percentages are calculated of known values after excluding unknown values from the denominator.
†Visual field grading scale; 0 = normal field; 1 = arcuate field deficit or mild general depression; 2 = relative central (less than 6 degrees), or cecocentral, or altitudinal; 3 = altitudinal plus additional loss or very severe constriction; 4 = no light perception.
From Table 2, Turbin RE, Thompson CR, Kennerdell JS, Cockerham KP, Kupersmith MJ (2002) A long-term visual outcome comparison in patients with optic neve sheath meningioma managed with observation, surgery, radiotherapy, or surgery and radiotherapy. Ophthalmology 109(5):890–899
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
24 |
R. E. Turbin and J. S. Kennerdell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.3 |
|
3.3.3.1 |
|
|
Growth Patterns |
|
Growth Patterns Defined |
|
|
In general terms, primary ONSM progression is asso- |
The classification of general growth patterns has been |
||
|
ciated with chronic optic nerve compression and occa- |
detailed over the years by various authors, but Rootman’s |
||
|
sionally invasion of the nerve as in other forms of men- |
classification of four patterns (tubular, globular, fusi- |
||
|
ingioma that involve cranial nerves (Larson et al. 1995; |
form, or focal) is a clinically relevant summary of tumor |
||
|
Sen and Hague 1997). This causes typically painless, |
configuration (Figs. 3.5–3.9). He further subdivided the |
||
|
progressive loss of visual function, and signs of optic |
tubular pattern into tubular-diffuse, tubular with apical, |
||
|
neuropathy including ipsilateral relative afferent pupil- |
and tubular with anterior expansion (Table 3.6). The |
||
|
lary defect, optic atrophy and nerve fiber layer loss that |
combined experience (88 patients) of the University of |
||
|
may be preceded by optic nerve head swelling. Patients |
British Columbia series and the University of Amster- |
||
|
may experience other symptoms and signs detailed |
dam between 1976 and 1999 (Saeed et al. 2003) was |
||
|
above (Tables 3.2–3.5), and the pattern of involvement |
described in both Rootman’s textbook and a recent ret- |
||
|
is typically reflected by extent, severity and duration of |
rospective study (Rootman 2003; Saeed et al. 2003). |
||
|
disease, as in other forms of compressive optic neuropa- |
However, with the exception of the tubular pattern |
||
|
thies. It is therefore germane to introduce some detail |
with apical expansion which demonstrated the worst |
||
|
concerning growth patterns and pathophysiology which |
visual prognosis, no correlation was found between |
||
|
will be discussed in subsequent chapters. |
|
3.38 mmPROOFSand in length by 0.12 mm per year, and non- |
|
|
|
ONSM configuration and visual outcome in his series. |
||
|
|
|
The authors do cite the trend towards early visual loss, |
|
|
|
|
and a higher tendency toward intracranial extension in |
|
|
|
|
patients with intracanalicular ONSM. Of all patients, |
|
|
|
|
27% suffered no light perception vision (NLP) before |
|
|
|
|
intervention. Calcified lesions increased in volume by |
|
|
|
|
D |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
calcified lesions grew six times faster, increasing in vol- |
|
|
|
C |
Eume by 23.45 mm3 and in length by 0.6 mm per year |
|
|
|
t(Rootman 2003; Saeed et al. 2003). |
||
|
E |
|
|
|
|
R |
|
|
|
Fig. 3.5. T1 weight MRI with contrast enhanced, fat suppression technique reveals a globular left ONSM. Tumor is represented by enhancing mass extending from left globe to orbital apex, with slight early enhancement extending into left optic canal. *Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD
Fig. 3.6. T1 weight MRI with contrast enhanced fat suppression technique reveals a tubular left ONSM extending from left globe up, through left optic canal, to the intracranial optic nerve. Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
Clinical Evaluation of Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma |
25 |
|
|
Fig. 3.7. T1 fat suppressed gadolinium enhanced example of another tubular left ONSM with intraorbital, intracanalicular (tramtracking), and intracranial optic nerve involvement.
Note the appearance of a thin line of contrast enhancement, or “tram-track” through the optic canal. In cases of isolated intracanalicular meningioma, this subtle sign is easily overlooked. Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD
|
|
|
PROOFS |
|
|
Fig. 3.8. Focal meningioma affecting the right intracranial |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
optic nerve segment, shown with T1 fat suppressed axial MRI. |
|
|
E |
|
|
t |
Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD |
||
|
|
||
C |
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
Fig. 3.9. A predominantly focal right ONSM, shown on contrast enhanced T1 axial image with fat suppression. Courtesy of Steve Newman, MD
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
26 R. E. Turbin and J. S. Kennerdell
table 3.6. Configuration of optic nerve sheath meningiomas as seen on imaging (n = 74 optic nerves)
Configuration |
number |
optic Cancal |
Intracranial |
tram tracking |
Clacification |
|
Irregular |
||||
|
|
Involvement |
Involvement |
|
|
|
|
|
Margins |
||
|
|
|
|
Dense |
scatter |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tubular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diffuse |
33 |
20 |
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
11 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apical expansion |
11 |
8 |
|
7 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anterior |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
expansion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Globular |
17 |
6 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
1 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fusiform |
8 |
3 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focal enlarge- |
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
ment of optic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nerve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
74 |
37 |
|
21 |
|
19 |
|
18 |
5 |
15 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
From Saeed P, Rootman J, Nugent RA et al. (2003) Optic nerve sheath meningiomas. Ophthalmology 110(10):2019–2030 |
|||||||||||
3.3.3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROOFS |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
earlier visual loss and optic atrophy has been described |
||||||
Variations in Growth Pattern |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Ewith intracanalicular ONSM, a location which provides |
||||||||
and Location Affect Symptoms |
|
tlittle room for growth before atrophy sets in (Ortiz |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
C |
et al. 1996; Castel et al. 2000; Jackson 2003). How- |
||||||
Variation in growth pattern may cause vision toEbe af- |
ever, cases of posterior involvement with swelling of |
||||||||||
fected at different rates and different stage Rof disease. |
the optic nerve do occur (Lindblom 1992b). Although |
||||||||||
Numerous authors have quoted Clark’s descriptionR |
that |
intracanalicular and posterior orbital lesions may rarely |
|||||||||
anterior nerve sheath meningioma located behind the |
be associated with disc swelling (Kennerdell and Ma- |
||||||||||
globe may spread extradurally or in a more relaxed |
roon 1975), almost all cases with disc swelling affect |
||||||||||
|
|
|
CO |
|
|
the more anterior orbit (Lindblom 1992b), |
|||||
fashion in the area where the nerve sheath inserts onto |
|||||||||||
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the posterior globe, limiting compression of the nerve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
u |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and preserving vision until late in the course. With in- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
creased growth, these patients may present with prop- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
tosis prior to visual loss (Figs. 3.10 and 3.11). Some |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
tumors, before they spread to reach the distal optic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
nerve, cause a cystic expansion of the distal perioptic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
optic space (Lindblom et al. 1992a, b; McNabb and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Wright 1989; Frasier and Green 2002) or a cystic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
expansion of the meningioma itself (Figs. 3.12 and 3.13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
(Laitt et al. 1996; Bosch et al. 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Posterior tumors may be more confined to the dura |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
and expand within the sheath, causing chronic com- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
pression or actual optic nerve invasion, which contrib- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
utes to choking off of the blood supply and limitation of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
axoplasmic flow. These changes lead to loss of vision and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
optic atrophy, often with only limited proptosis. This |
Fig. 3.10. Clinical photograph of 8 mm of left proptosis in a |
||||||||||
may occur with or without preceding optic disc swell- |
patient with a left anterior, intraorbital ONSM and 20/20 vision |
||||||||||
ing (Clark et al. 1989). A similar presentation with |
OU. Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD |
|
|
||||||||
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
Clinical Evaluation of Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma |
27 |
|
|
a |
|
|
C |
|
|
E |
|
|
Fig. 3.12. a Cystic expansion of the left perioptic space in a |
||
|
|
R |
|
|
patient with a predominantly intracanalicular ONSM with ex- |
||
|
|
R |
|
|
tension into the orbital apex. This is demonstrated as bright |
||
|
|
CO |
|
|
signal on this T2 weighted axial image. b The T1 fat sup- |
||
|
N |
|
|
|
u |
|
|
Fig. 3.11. The relatively anterior left intraorbital ONSM presumably allowed for peripheral expansion with little actual optic nerve compression, preserving visual acuity with 15 years of follow-up, in the same patient shown in Fig. 3.10. Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD
b
pressed image demonstrates predominantly intracanalicular ONSM with tubular extension into the left orbital apex, shown as plaque like enhancement in the same patient. Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD
Fig. 3.13. Gross pathology of resected massive cystic expansion of optic nerve meningioma. Cystic change is more common in optic nerve glioma. From Rosca TI, Carstocea BD, Vlãdescu TG (2006) Cystic optic nerve sheath meningioma.
J Neuroophthalmol 26(2):121–122
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
28
Clinical Evaluation of Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma |
29 |
|
|
|
|
nal opening. Rootman describes half of the patients in |
more aggressive, Dutton concluded that there was little |
|
his series with bilateral ONSM to have radiographic in- |
evidence to support that contralateral visual morbidity |
|
volvement of the planum sphenoidale in continuity with |
or patient mortality was at higher risk in these pediat- |
|
both optic canals (Saeed et al. 2003; Rootman 2003). |
ric ONSM. Although five deaths were reported in cases |
|
The spread of an initially unilateral primary ONSM |
of pediatric ONSM, all were related to operative com- |
|
across to the contralateral optic nerve is rare. |
plications or other causes (Alper 1981). In children it |
|
|
may be difficult to differentiate the more common op- |
|
3.4.4 |
tic nerve glioma from optic nerve sheath meningioma, |
|
and there are no completely valid clinical criteria (Karp |
|
|
Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma in Pregnancy |
et al. 1974). The entire clinical and radiographic picture |
|
Growth of ONSM may be initiated or accelerated in |
must be considered, with occasional resort to incisional |
|
or excisional biopsy. Irregular nodular surface, calcifi- |
|
|
pregnancy. In some cases, a rapid growth phase is ob- |
cation, and bone change (hyperostosis) are more com- |
|
served during pregnancy probably mediated by estro- |
mon in ONSM, but imaging overlap occurs. Glioma |
|
gen, progesterone, or androgen receptors. As in other |
may also be associated with arachnoid hyperplasia that |
|
forms of meningioma, stable, known, or occult ONSMs |
may simulate ONSM (Fig. 3.14). Although the numbers |
|
may exhibit accelerated growth and cause visual decline |
are exceedingly small, the mean age of onset for five pa- |
|
during pregnancy (Newell and Beamon 1958; Wan |
tients with bilateral ONSM was 12.8 years, suggesting a |
|
et al. 1990; Maxwell et al. 1993; Turbin et al. 2002; |
predominance in children (Dutton 1992). |
|
Wright 1977). |
|
|
|
3.4.6 |
|
3.4.5 |
Ectopic Intraorbital Meningioma |
|
Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma in Children |
DuttonPROOFSreviewed the concept of intraorbital menin- |
|
It has been reported that ONSM in children run a more |
|
|
gioma arising from a site ectopic to the optic nerve |
|
|
aggressive clinical course, occasionally requiring com- |
D |
|
Esheath. He found an incidence of 4% primary ectopic |
|
|
plete surgical excision or exenteration (Alper 1981;torbital meningioma similar to Rootman’s citation of 1 |
|
|
Wright 1977; Wright et al. 1989; Ito et al. 1988;CJa- |
case in 23 (4%) (Table 3.1). Dutton concluded that the |
|
kobiec et al. 1984; Walsh 1970). Although possiblyE |
existence of true intraorbital ectopic meningioma is |
|
R |
|
|
R |
|
|
a |
b |
Fig. 3.14. a,b Fusiform enlargement and kinking of left optic nerve extending from left globe, up to and involving optic chiasm as shown on T1 axial image without fat suppression. Kinking, and intrinsic neural enlargement suggest glioma over meningioma. The T2 coronal image demonstrates fusiform enlargement of optic nerve glioma associated with concentric
arachnoid hyperplasia, leading to an appearance that simulates ONSM in this case of biopsy proven (resection) glioma in a 12-year-old girl with neurofibromatosis 1. Similarly, some patients presumed to harbor optic nerve glioma are diagnosed with ONSM at time of surgery. c see next page
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
30 R. E. Turbin and J. S. Kennerdell
Fig. 3.14. (continued) c Hematoxylin and eosin preparation of meningothelial proliferation with microcystic spaces and calcification. Other sections of nerve showed true Rosenthal fibers c/w optic nerve glioma with reactive meningothelial hyperplasia in a 12-year-old girl with NF 1 (see a,b). *Courtesy of Paul Langer, MD and Neena Mirani, MD
open to debate, but probably represents a real but rare |
infiltrate, nonspecific orbital inflammation (NSOI) or |
|||
entity. We have not seen a true case at our institution. |
other orbital tumors (Fig. 3.15). Orbital 2D B mode ul- |
|||
Authors have argued that these lesions might arise |
trasound may occasional be helpful to prove that a large |
|||
form orbital mesenchymal cells, represent extensions of |
orbital mass is distinct from the intraorbital optic nerve |
|||
arachnoid tufts from the optic nerve, or simply may rep- |
(Fig. 3.16). MRI and CT characteristics of ONSM are |
|||
resent misdiagnosis of other lesions (Karp et al. 1974; |
presentedPROOFSelsewhere in this text. |
|||
Spencer 1972; Shuanshoti 1973; Tan 1989). We have |
Continued visual loss despite the resolution of disc |
|||
treated patients initially diagnosed with ectopic menin- |
D |
|||
Eswelling in presumed NAION, progressive visual loss in |
||||
gioma, whose lesions were reclassified as other entitiest“unobserved NAION” after disc edema resolution and |
||||
by immunohistochemical analysis after recurrence.C |
cases mislabeled posterior ischemic optic neuropathy |
|||
|
|
|
E |
may harbor occult ONSM. However, in most of these |
|
|
|
R |
cases chronic progressive visual loss is the rule and |
|
|
|
R |
diagnosis is reached when visual loss progresses and |
|
|
|
||
3.5 |
|
|
CO |
patients are re-imaged with appropriate fat-suppressed |
Differential Diagnosis |
|
|||
|
gadolinium enhanced techniques. Sarcoid optic nerve |
|||
|
|
|
involvement (neurosarcoid) is especially difficult to |
|
|
|
N |
||
|
|
distinguish from some cases of ONSM (Figs. 3.17 and |
||
Optic nerve glioma and meningioma are the common- |
||||
|
|
u |
|
3.18). The difficulty in distinguishing ONSM from |
est neoplasms affecting the optic nerve and may have |
||||
overlapping features, although clinical differences sepa- |
sarcoid and other forms of inflammatory neuritis and |
|||
rate the two lesions (Cooling and Wright 1979). For |
perineuritis supports treatment with short empiric tri- |
|||
instance, some children thought to harbor optic nerve |
als of high dose corticosteroids in patients with atypical |
|||
glioma may have ONSM, especially in patients with |
radiographic findings or unexpected progressive visual |
|||
NF1 and concentric arachnoid hyperplasia (Fig. 3.14). |
loss and no other systemic or infectious contraindica- |
|||
The clinical presentation of ONSM may occasionally be |
tions. Indications and procedures for confirmatory bi- |
|||
difficult to distinguish from papillitis, perineuritis, sar- |
opsy will be discussed in a subsequent chapter. |
|||
coid, unilateral papilledema, diabetic papillopathy, non |
|
|||
arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), leukemic |
|
|||
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
Clinical Evaluation of Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma |
31 |
|
|
a |
b |
|
Fig. 3.15a–c. It may occasionally be difficult to radiographi- |
|
cally distinguish some orbital tumors such as this biopsy |
|
proven schwannoma from primary ONSM (see axial image a). |
|
However, careful examination of coronal images (b) identified |
|
the tumor (c) located medial to and not intrinsic to the optic |
|
nerve (arrow). At excisional biopsy through a superior medial |
|
orbitotomy, the purple lesion was confirmed to be distinct from |
|
the optic nerve and extended to the orbital apex. Courtesy of |
c |
Roger Turbin, MD |
|
N |
|
u |
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
32 R. E. Turbin and J. S. Kennerdell
a
|
Fig. 3.16. Axial MRI images (a) without fat suppression fail |
|
to distinguish a large left orbital mass from the intraorbital |
|
PROOFS |
|
optic nerve. However, 2D B scan ultrasound (b) delineates |
b |
tumor (white oval) from optic nerve shadow (white arrow). |
Courtesy of Roger Turbin, MD |
|
D |
E |
|
t |
|
Fig. 3.17. T1 weighted fat suppressed axial image of right optic nerve lesion mimicking an apical and intraorbital tubular ONSM. Biopsy of this lesion ultimately revealed sarcoid. Sarcoid may be indistinguishable to even the most experienced clinicians and radiologists. Courtesy of Larry Frohman, MD
Fig. 3.18. Biopsy proven case of sarcoid simulating and orbital apex meningioma with intracranial extension, on T1 weighted coronal MRI. Courtesy of Larry Frohman, MD
978-3-540-77557-7_3_2008-08-06_1
