Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Optics of the Human Eye_Atchison, Smith_2000

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
5.98 Mб
Скачать

Schematic eyes

251

Relaxed 'exact' schematic eyes

Gullstrand exact or number 1

Medium

n

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.000

7.700

48.831

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cornea

1.376

 

0.500

43.053

 

Aqueous

 

6.800

-5.882

 

 

1.336

 

3.100

 

 

Lens:

 

10.000

5.000

 

58.636

 

 

 

 

 

Cortex

1.386

 

0.546

 

 

 

 

7.911

2.528

19.111

 

Core

1.406

 

2.419

 

Cortex

 

-5.760

3.472

 

 

1.386

 

0.635

 

 

Vitreous

 

-6.000

8.333

 

 

1.336

 

17.18540

 

 

Le Grand full theoretical eye

Medium

n

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.0000

7.800

48.346

 

 

Cornea

 

 

 

1.3771

 

0.550

42.356

 

Aqueous

 

6.500

-6.108

 

 

1.3374

 

3.050

 

59.940

 

 

10.200

8.098

 

 

Lens

1.4200

 

4.000

21.779

 

Vitreous

 

-6.000

14.000

 

 

1.3360

 

16.59655

 

 

Relaxed simplified schematic eyes

Gullstrand-Emsley

Medium

n

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.000

7.800

42.735

42.735

 

Cornea

 

 

4/3

10.000

3.6

 

60.483

Lens

1.416

8.267

 

 

-6.00

3.6

21.755

 

Vitreous

 

13.778

 

 

4/3

 

16.69620

 

 

252 Appendices

Bennett-Rabbetts

Medium

11

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.000

7.800

43.077

43.077

 

Cornea

 

 

1.336

11.000

3.6

 

 

Lens

 

7.818

 

60.000

1.422

-6.47515

3.7

20.828

 

Vitreous

 

13.280

 

 

1.336

 

16.78627

 

 

Reduced eyes

Emsley

Medium

11

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.000

5.555

 

 

60.00

Vitreous

4/3

22.22222

 

 

 

 

Accommodated 'exact' schematic eyes

Gullstrand (accommodation distance = -92.00 mm ('" 10.878

Medium

11

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.000

7.700

48.831

 

 

Cornea

 

 

 

1.376

 

0.500

43.053

 

Aqueous

 

6.800

-5.882

 

 

1.336

 

2.700

 

 

Lens:

 

5.333

9.376

 

70.576

 

 

 

 

 

Cortex

1.386

 

0.6725

 

 

Core

 

2.655

7.533

 

 

1.406

 

2.6550

33.057

 

Cortex

 

-2.655

7.533

 

 

1.386

 

0.6725

 

 

Vitreous

 

5.333

9.376

 

 

1.336

 

17.18540

 

 

Schematic eyes 253

Le Grand full theoretical eye (accommodation distance =-141.793 mm (== 7.053

Medium

II

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.0000

7.800

48.346

 

 

 

 

42.356

 

Cornea

1.3771

 

0.550

 

Aqueous

 

6.500

-6.108

 

67.677

1.3374

 

2.650

 

 

 

6.000

14.933

30.700

 

Lens

1.4270

 

4.500

 

Vitreous

 

-5.500

16.545

 

 

1.3360

 

16.49655

 

 

Accommodated simplified schematic eyes

Gullstrand-Emsley (accommodation distance =-116.298 mm (== 8.599

Medium

n

R

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.000

7.8

42.735

42.735

 

Cornea

 

 

4/3

 

3.2

 

69.721

Lens

 

5.0

16.533

 

 

1.416

 

4.0

32.295

 

Vitreous

 

-5.0

16.533

 

 

4/3

 

16.69621

 

 

Gaussian properties

 

 

'Exact'

Relaxed eyes

 

Reduced

 

Accommodated eyes

 

 

Simplified

 

'Exact'

Simplified

 

GulLI

Le Grand

Gull-Ems B-R

Emsley

Gull.

LeGrand

Gull-Ems

Power (D)

58.636

59.940

60.483

60

60

70.576

67.677

69.721

Eye length

24.385

24.197

23.896

24.086

22.222

 

 

 

VV'

7.2

7.6

7.2

7.3

 

7.2

7.7

7.2

OV

 

 

 

 

 

92.000

141.792

116.298

Accom, level (D)

0

0

0

0

0

10.870

7.053

8.599

Cardinal point positions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VF

-15.706

-15.089

-14.983

-15.156

-16.667

-12.397

-12.957

-12.561

VF'

24.385

24.197

23.896

24.086

22.222

21.016

21.932

21.252

VP

1.348

1.595

1.550

1.511

0.000

1.772

1.819

1.782

VP'

1.601

1.908

1.851

1.819

0.000

2.086

2.192

2.128

VN

7.078

7.200

7.062

7.111

5.556

6.533

6.784

6.562

VN'

7.331

7.513

7.363

7.419

5.556

6.847

7.156

6.909

PN = P'N'

5.730

5.606

5.511

5.600

5.556

4.761

4.965

4.781

FP=N'F'

17.054

16.683

16.534

16.667

16.667

14.169

14.776

14.343

P'F'=FN

22.785

22.289

22.045

22.267

22.222

18.930

19.741

19.124

N'R'

 

 

 

 

 

17.539

17.041

16.987

F'R'

 

 

 

 

 

3.370

2.264

2.644

Continued overleaf

254

AI'I'<'IldiC<'s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gaussian properties continued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Relaxed<'l/<'S

 

 

 

Acc(1/1l1/lOdall'd cue»

 

'Exact'

Simplified

 

Reduced

'Exact'

Si/ilpl!fied

 

Gull. 1

Le Grand

Gull-Ems

B-R

Emsley

Gull.

Le Grand

Gull-Ems

Pupils: rNA for 8 /III/I diameter PI/Pi/)

 

 

 

 

 

 

VE

3.047

3.038

3.052

3.048

0.000

2.668

2.660

2.674

VE'

3.665

3.682

3.687

3.699

0.000

3.212

3.255

3.249

MEA

1.133

1.131

1.130

1.131

1.000

1.117

1.115

1.114

ME'A

1.031

1.041

1.036

1.036

1.000

1.051

1.055

1.049

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0.0423

0.0277

0.0375

NA'

0.2345

0.240

0.242

0.240

0.240

0.2374

0.2414

0.2710

m

0.823085

0.813243

0.818128

0.817532

0.750000

0.795850

0.791122

0.796683

E'R'

20.720

20.515

20.209

20.387

22.222

21.173

20.942

20.647

Seidel aberrations

 

S/8

S2/ 2

S~/4

S~/4

%SS

CL/2

%CT

Relaxed eyes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gullstrand exact eye (by surface contribution)

 

 

 

 

 

1

23.6327

9.6202

0.4895

1.8447

-0.0800

9.5960

-0.3287

2

-2.0030

-0.7207

-0.0324

-0.1663

0.0060

-0.8665

0.0262

3

0.1577

0.2090

0.0346

0.1404

-0.0195

0.4821

-0.0538

4

0.2057

0.2100

0.0268

0.0675

-0.0081

0.2489

-0.0214

5

5.1871

-1.0374

0.0259

0.0926

0.0020

0.5175

0.0087

6

11.7803

-2.0552

0.0449

0.2340

0.0041

1.2479

0.0183

Total

38.9605

6.2258

0.5893

2.2127

-0.0955

11.2259

-0.3506

Le Grand

39.1445

6.2642

0.5619

2.2578

-0.1012

11.3592

-0.3694

Gullstrand-Emsley

41.2324

5.8719

0.5901

2.2731

-0.0990

11.5061

-0.3603

Bennett-Rabbetts

38.5293

5.8075

0.5819

2.2534

-0.0997

11.4031

-0.3622

Emsley

59.4091

28.8757

1.7543

2.3392

-0.1674

12.1682

-0.4977

Accommodated eyes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gullstrand exact eye (by surface contribution)

 

 

 

 

 

1

29.6779

12.4057

0.6482

1.8447

-0.0877

9.8212

-0.3455

2

-2.5355

-0.9513

-0.0446

-0.1663

0.0067

-0.8856

0.0280

3

5.6696

2.8705

0.1817

0.2632

-0.0190

1.2617

-0.0538

4

22.8734

6.7077

0.2458

0.2009

-0.0110

1.0154

-0.0251

5

34.7899

1.8831

0.0127

0.2009

-0.0010

1.0154

-0.0046

6

15.8359

-1.4826

0.0173

0.2632

0.0021

1.3966

0.0110

Total

106.3111

21.4332

1.0613

2.6066

-0.1098

13.6247

-0.3900

Le Grand

53.5239

12.0929

0.8439

2.510-1

-0.1126

12.9305

-0.4044

Gullstrand-Emsley

65.9357

14.0976

0.9216

2.5765

-0.1092

13.4028

-0.3921

Finite schematic eyes

List of eyes

Lotmar (1971)

Kooijman (1983) Navarro et al. (1985)

Liou and Brennan (1997)

Further information about these model eyes is given in Chapters 16 and 17.

Schematic eyes

255

Lotmar (1971) - same as Le Grand eye except for surface asphericities

Medium

/I

R

Q

d

Equivalent powers

Whole eye

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Air

1.0000

7.8

-D.286*

48.346

 

 

 

 

42.356

 

Cornea

1.3771

 

 

0.55

 

 

 

6.5

0

-6.108

 

59.940

Aqueous

1.3374

 

 

3.05

 

 

 

10.2

0

8.098

 

 

Lens

1.4200

 

 

4.00

21.779

 

 

 

-6.0

-1.0

14.000

 

 

Vitreous

1.3360

-12.3

 

16.59655

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Lotmar represented the front surface of the cornea by equation (17.23), and

the above value of Q is the value for a figured conicoid filled tu equation (17.25).

The conicoid aspheridty and figuring co-efficients are:

 

 

 

Q = ..j).2857143,f. = 0.0./. = -2.547626E.()6'/. = -8.104263E-tJ9./", = -6.660308E-ll./12 = -5.864599E-13

 

 

The termination of the figuring co-efficients at the "'2

term gives an error of less than 2E.()6at a ray height of 1/= 4 mm.

 

Kooijman (1983) - same as Le Grand eye except for surface asphericities

Medium

/I

R

Q

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.0000

7.8

-D.25

48.346

 

 

Cornea

 

 

 

1.3771

 

 

0.50

42.356

 

Aqueous

 

6.5

-D.25

--{;.108

 

 

1.3374

10.2

 

3.05

 

59.940

Lens

 

-3.06

8.098

 

 

1.4200

--{;.O

-1.0

4.00

21.779

 

Vitreous

 

14.000

 

 

1.3360

 

 

16.59655

 

 

Two models of retinal radius were offered; one with a radius of curvature of -10.8 mm and a Q value of 0, and the other with a radius of curvature of -14.1 mm and a Q value of 0.346.

Navarro et al. (1985)

Medium

/I

R

Q

d

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.0000

7.72

-D.26

48.705

 

 

Cornea

1.376

 

 

6.5

 

0.55

42.882

 

Aqueous

1.3374

0

-5.983

 

 

(1O.2)R3

(-3.1316)Q3

(3.05)d2

8.098

60.416

Lens

(1.42)/13

(4.oo)d3

 

(--{;.0)R4

(-1.0)Q4

21.779

 

Vitreous

1.3360

16.40398

14.000

 

-12.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The bracketed values are for the relaxed condition.

256

Appendices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The model is set any level of accommodation by the following equations:

 

R

=10.2

-

1.75

In(A + 1)

 

 

 

 

 

R3

=-6.0

+ 0.2294

In(A + 1)

 

 

 

 

 

d 4

=

3.05

-

0.05

In(A + 1)

 

 

 

 

 

dz

4.0

+ 0.1

In(A + 1)

 

 

 

 

 

n3

=

1.42

+ 9x10-5

(lOA + AZ)

 

 

 

 

 

Q3

=-3.1316

-

0.34

In(A + 1)

 

 

 

 

 

Q34 =

-1.0

-

0.125

In(A + 1)

 

 

 

 

 

where A is the accommodation level (dioptres).

 

 

 

 

For example, at 10 D of accommodation,

 

 

 

 

Medium

 

 

II

R

Q

d

 

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

 

 

 

1.0000

7.72

-0.26

 

48.705

 

 

Cornea

 

 

1.376

0.50

42.882

 

 

 

6.5

0

-5.938

 

Aqueous

 

 

1.3374

2.930110

 

71.145

 

 

6.00368

-3.94688

16.756

 

Lens

 

 

 

1.438

4.23979

34.548

 

 

 

 

-5.44992

-1.29974

18.716

 

Vitreous

 

 

1.3360

16.28415

 

 

 

 

-12.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liou and Brennan (1997)

Medium

n

R

Q

d

 

Equivalent powers

 

 

 

 

 

 

Surface

Component

Whole eye

Air

1.000

7.77

-0.18

 

48.391

 

 

Cornea

1.376

0.55

42.262

 

6.40

-0.60

-6.250

 

Aqueous

1.336

3.16

 

 

12.40

-0.94

2.581

 

60.314

 

 

 

 

Lens

Grad A

 

 

1.59

6.283

22.134

 

Lens

Grad P

 

 

2.43

9.586

 

 

 

 

 

Vitreous

1.336

-8.10

+0.96

 

3.950

 

 

 

 

16.23883

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gradient index details of lens:

Grad A

Grad P

N

=

1.368

1.407

NoO.O1

=

0.049057

0.000000

NO2

=-0.015427

-0.006605

N1o= -0.001978

-0.001978

No retinal radius of curvature was provided.

The stop is displaced 05 mm from the optical axis to the nasal side,

 

 

 

 

 

Schematic eyes 257

Gaussian properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lotmar',

Navarro

Liou and

 

 

Kooijman'

Relaxed

Accomm (10 D)

Brennan

Eye length

24.196552

24.003979

24.003979

23.950014

Power

59.940

60.416

71.145

60.343

Cardinal pointpositions

-15.089

-14.969

-12.051

-15.040

VF

VF'

24.197

24.004

21.172

23.950

VP

1.595

1.583

2.005

1.532

VP'

1.908

1.890

2.393

1.810

VN

7.200

7.145

6.727

7.100

VN'

7.513

7.452

7.116

7.378

PN = P'N'

5.606

5.561

4.723

5.568

FP=N'F'

16.683

16.552

14.056

16.572

P'F'=FN

22.289

22.114

18.779

22.140

F'R'

0.000

0.000

2.832

0.000

Pupils:

 

3.042

2.928

3.098

VE

3.038

VE'

3.682

3.682

3.551

3.720

MEA

1.133

1.133

1.128

1.133

1.041

1.041

1.058

1.035

M

'

ill

EA

0.813243

0.814493

0.797668

0.819238

'Same as Le Grand full theoretical eye.

Seidel aberrations

 

51/8

52/2

5/4

54/4

%55

Relaxed eyes

 

 

 

 

 

Lotmar (1971)

20.3144

7.1107

0.3392

2.2578

-0.1001

Kooijman (1983)

15.7668

6.2829

0.3648

2.2578

-0.0995

Navarro et al.(1985)

13.8628

7.0582

0.3421

2.2775

-0.0991

Liou and Brennan' (1997)

7.3745

1.6754

0.5424

1.8371

-0.2064

Accommodated eyes

 

 

 

 

 

Navarro et al. (1985) (10 D)

-26.1827

9.0316

0.4876

2.6315

-0.1019

"The stop is displaced 0.5 mm from the optical axis to the nasal side, but this has been ignored for the analysis.

Summary of symbols

n

r d

E, E'

F, F'

P, pi

N,N'

V, V'

refractive index

 

Position of retina (at axial pole)

radius of curvature

 

magnification of entrance pupil

surface separations

 

and exit pupil

Entrance and exit pupils

 

ratio of the paraxial pupil ray

Front and back focal points

 

angles in image and object

Front and back principal points

 

space

Front and back nodal points

NA,NA'

numerical apertures in object

Front and back vertex points

 

and image spaces

258 Appelldict',;

References

Emsley, H. H. (1952). Visual Optics, vol. 1, 5th edn, pp. 4Q.41, 346. Butterworths.

Gullstrand, A. (1909). Appendix 11: Procedure of rays in the eye. Imagery -laws of the first order. In Helmholtz's Handbucll der Pllysiologiscllell Opti«, vol. 1, 3rd edn (English translation edited by J. P. Southall, Optical Society of America, 1924).

Helmholtz, H. von (1909). Halldbllcll dcr Pllysiologischell Optik, vol. 1, 3rd edn (English translation edited by J. P. Southall, Optical Society of America, 1924).

Kooijrnan, A. C. (1983). Light distribution on the retina of a wide-angle theoretical eye. J. 01'1. Soc. Am., 73, 1544-50.

LeGrand, Y. and El Hage. S. G. (1980). Physiological Optics. Translation and update of Le Grand Y. (1968). La dioptriquc de l'oeil e! sa correction, vol. I of Optiquc pll)fSiologiql/e, pp. 65-7. Springer-Verlag.

Liou, H.-L. and Brennan, N. A. (1997). Anatomically

accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling. f. Opt. Soc. Am. A., 14, 1684-95.

Lotrnar, W. (1971). Theoretical eye model with aspheric surfaces. J. 01'1. Soc. Am., 61, 1522-9.

Navarro, R., Santamaria, J. and Bescos, J. (1985). Accommodation-dependent model of the human eye with aspherics. f. Opt. Soc. Am. A., 2, 1273-81.

Rabbetts, R. B. (1998). Benllettalld Rabbett,' Clinical Visual Optics, 3rd edn, pp. 209-13. Butterworth-Heinemann.

A4

Calculation of PSF and OTF from aberrations of an optical system

The point spread function (PSF)

We show how to calculate the PSF, taking into account diffraction, defocus, aberrations, polychromatic light, the photopic luminous efficiency function V(It) and the StilesCrawford effect. Scatter is more difficult to include in these calculations, so we will

neglect it.

The PSF can be calculated if the wave aberration in the pupil of the eye is known. From optical image formation theory (see

Smith and Atchison, 1997), the PSF is related to the wave aberration via a Fourier trans-

form. The background for the following equations is taken from the above reference.

Rather than express the PSF as a light distribution at the retina, we will express it as the

equivalent distribution projected back into object space. The major difference will be that,

in the first case spatial co-ordinates will be in linear quantities such as millimetres, and in

the second case they will be in angular units. Calculating the point spread function back in object space, taken as air, also avoids the need

to use the image space refractive index in the diffraction integral.

Before we present equations for calculating the PSF from the wave aberration in the pupil, we must first distinguish the amplitude PSF from the intensity PSF. The amplitude PSF is

the complex amplitude of the light distribution, whereas the intensity PSF is the actual

light distribution that we measure with a light meter. When we refer to the PSF, we mean the

intensity PSF unless otherwise indicated.

If we denote the amplitude PSF as ga(u,v), where u and v are the directions in object space, and the PSF as g(u,v), these two quantities are related by the equation

g(u,v) =ga(u,v)g*a(u,v)

(A4.1)

where * refers to the complex conjugate. The amplitude PSF is related to the wave aberration W(X,Y)by the equation

ga(u,v) =CJJEP(X,y)e-i2lt(UX+vY)dXdY (A4.2)

where

 

C is a constant = (II It)

(A4.3)

E implies integration over the pupil of radius 15, (u, v) are related to the actual angles (in

radians) Ox and 0y in the X and Y directions, respectively, by the equations

Ox = Itu and 0y = ltv

(A4.4)

(X, Y) are the cartesian co-ordinates in the pupil, and P(X, Y) is the complex amplitude in

the pupil known as the pupil function, which is mathematically defined as

P(X, Y) = A(X,Y)e[-ikW(X,Y))

(A4.5)

The constant k =2rrlIt, A(X, Y) is the amplitude transmittance at the point (X, Y) in the pupil, and is included to allow for the Stiles-Crawford effect. W(X, Y) is the wave aberration as an optical path difference, and is expressed in normal units of distance and not wavelength.

Equation (A4.2) is a Fourier transform of

260 Appel/dices

the pupil function P(X/ Y)/ and is zero outside the pupil. However, it would not be a Fourier

transform if the object space variables were the real angles Ox and 0y/instead of II and v. In other words, the use of II and v and not Ox and 0y allows the amplitude point spread function

to be expressed as a Fourier transform.

We will regard the Stiles-Crawford effect as rotationally symmetric in the pupil, and can write it as

A(X, Y) =eHfJ/ Z)(X2 + ¥2)j

(A4.6)

where f3 is the Stiles-Crawford attenuation factor to base e and the //2/ factor is included because we must use an 'amplitude' Stiles-Crawford effect and not the normal 'intensity' effect (Krakau, 1974). Typical values for f3 are given in Chapter 13.

The wave aberration function

W(X, Y)

The wave aberration function W(X/ Y) is described in detail in Appendix 2. It is one way of quantifying the level of aberrations. The

function is a polynomial in X and Y/ and the different terms represent the different

aberrations - e.g. spherical aberration and coma. It can also incorporate defocus and

chromatic aberrations.

Defocus

If the eye is defocused by an amount L1F/ e.g. 0.5 0/ a defocus term W (X2 + y2) can be

ZO

added to the wave aberration polynomial,

where L1F and the co-efficient Wz0 are related

by equation (A2.5), i.e.

'

Wz,o = L1F/2

(A4.7)

For example, a defocus of

+0.5 0 gives

Wz,o = +0.00025mm".

 

Chromatic aberration

As discussed in Chapter 17/ longitudinal and transverse chromatic aberration arise because

of the dispersion of the ocular media. The dispersion leads to a chromatic change in

power L1F(,t) given by the equation

L1F(,t) = F(,t) - F(X)

(A4.8)

where F(A) is the power at the wavelength A and X is the reference wavelength for zero

chromatic aberration. Equations for F(,t) are given in Chapter 17.

For on-axis and off-axis point spread

functions, longitudinal chromatic aberration is taken into account with a wave aberration

term Wz,o(,t)(Xz + yZ). The co-efficient is related to the chromatic change in power L1F(A) by the equation

Wzo(,t) =L1F(,t)/2

(A4.9)

For off-axis point spread functions, transverse chromatic aberration is taken into account with a wave aberration term W11(,t)Y or W1,1(A)X. The co-efficient is related to the chromatic change in power L1F(,t) by the equation

W1,1(,t) =OENL1F(,t)/n(,t)

(A4.1O)

where 0 is the angular distance off-axis, EN is

the distance from the entrance pupil to the front nodal point, and n(,t) is the refractive

index of the vitreous medium. Transverse chromatic aberration leads to a PSF having a transverse shift that is wavelength dependent.

Polychromatic sources

For polychromatic light sources, the PSF is

calculated at a number of wavelengths. The chromatic aberrations are included in the wave aberration function. Each point spread

function is weighted by both the relative sensitivity of the eye V(,t) (Chapter 11) and the

relative radiance of the source S(,t). The polychromatic point spread function is formed by adding the weighted individual point spread functions, but only after these have been expressed in terms of the real ?ngles Ox and 0y/ instead of 1I and v. That

1S,

(A4.11)

Computation checks

For any computation of the point spread function via equation (A4.2), it is good practice to have independent checks of the final result. The following three conditions