Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Optics of the Human Eye_Atchison, Smith_2000
.pdfThe fovea is the central part of the macula, whose peripheral limits are where the cells of
the outer nuclear layer are reduced to a single row (Hogan et al., 1971). The macular
diameter is 5.5 mm (19°).
The optic disc and blind spot
The vascular supply to the outer layers of the retina is carried in the choroid, which lies between the retina and the sclera. The vascular supply to the inner retina enters the
eye at the optic disc, whose location is shown in Figure 1.1. There are no cones or rods here, and hence this region is blind. The name given to the corresponding region in the visual field
is the 'blind spot'. The optic disc is approximately 5° wide horizontally and 7° vertically,
and its centre is approximately 15° nasally and 1.5° upwards relative to the fovea. Correspondingly, the blind spot is 15° temporally and 1.5° downwards relative to
the point of fixation. Figure 1.5 provides a demonstration of the blind spot.
The cardinal points
Every centred optical system that has some equivalent power (i.e. is not afocal) has six cardinal points that lie on the optical axis.
These are in three pairs. Two are focal points which we denote by the symbols F and F', two are principal points denoted by the symbols P and P', and two are nodal points denoted by the symbols Nand N'. The positions of these
cardinal points in an eye depend upon its structure and the level of accommodation. For an eye focused at infinity, the approximate positions of these cardinal points are shown in
Figure 1.1.More precise positions are given in Chapter 5, where we discuss schematic eyes
+
Figure 1.5. Demonstration of the blind spot. Look steadily at the cross with your right eye (left eye closed) from a distance of about 20 cm. Vary this distance until you find a position for which the spot disappears.
Tile Ill/mall eye: all (ll'CI'l';ew |
7 |
and their properties. These cardinal points are as follows:
1.Focal points (F and F'). Light leaving the front (also first and anterior) focal point F passes into the eye, and would be imaged at infinity after final refraction by the lens if the retina were not in the way. Light parallel to the axis and coming into the eye from an infinite distance is imaged at the back (also second and posterior) focal point F'. Thus, for the eye focused at infinity, the retina coincides with the back focal point.
2.Principal points (P and P'). These are images of (or conjugate to) each other, such that their transverse magnification is +1. That is, if an object were placed at one of these points, an erect image of the same size would be formed at the other point.
3.Nodal points (N and N'). These are also images or conjugates of each other, but have a special property such that a ray from an off-axis point passing towards N appears to pass through N' on the image side of the system, while inclined at the same angle to the axis on each side of the system. Such a ray is called the nodal ray, and when the off-axis point is the point of fixation, the ray is called the visual axis.
We make use of these cardinal points frequently in the following chapters.
The equivalent power and focal lengths
One of the important properties of any optical system is its equivalent power. This is a measure of the ability of the system to bend or deviate rays of light. The higher the power, the greater is the ability to deviate rays. We
denote the equivalent power of an optical system by the symbol F. The equivalent
power of the eye is related to the distances between the focal and principal points by the equation
F =- |
1 n' |
|
PF =P'F' |
(1.1) |
where n' is the refractive index in the vitreous chamber. The average power of the eye for adults is about 60 m-l or 60 D, but the value
varies greatly from eye to eye. Using this
8Basic optical structure of til"1IIII/lIl1l "!I"
power and the commonly accepted refractive index n' of the vitreous chamber (1.336), the focal lengths of the eye are
PF =-16.7 mm and P'F' =+22.3 mm |
(1.2) |
While the equivalent power of the eye is a very important property of the eye, it is not easy to measure directly. Its value is usually inferred from the other measurable quantities such as surface radii of curvature, surface separations and eye length, and assumed refractive indices of the ocular media.
However, more important than equivalent power is refractive error. The refractive error can be regarded as an error in the equivalent power due to a mismatch between the
equivalent power and the eye length. For example, if the equivalent power is too high
for a certain eye length, the image is formed in front of the retina and this results in a myopic refractive error. If the power is too low, the
image is formed behind the retina and results in a hypermetropic refractive error. Refractive errors are discussed in Chapter 7.
however, we can nominate a mean position for this point. The rotation of the eye in the horizontal plane was studied by Fry and Hill (1962), who found that the mean centre-of- rotation for 31 subjects was about 15 mm
behind the cornea. Often it is assumed to lie along the optical axis.
Field-of-vision
Examination of the pupil from different
angles shows that the pupil can still be seen at angles greater than 90° in the temporal field. Light is able to enter the pupil from about 105° to the side, as shown in Figure 1.6. While this suggests that the radius of the field-of-view may be as great as 105°, the real extent of the field-of-vision depends upon the extent of retina in the extreme directions. On the nasal side, vision is cut-off at about 60° because of the combination of the nose and the limited extent of the temporal retina.
Axes of the eye
The eye has a number of axes. Figure 1.1 shows two of these: the optical axis and the
visual axis. The optical axis is usually defined as the line joining the centres of curvatures of
the refracting surfaces. However, the eye is
not perfectly rotationally symmetric, and therefore even if the four refracting surfaces
were each perfectly rotationally symmetric, the four centres of curvatures would not be
co-linear. Thus in the case of the eye, we define the optical axis as the line of best fit through these non co-linear points. The visual axis is defined as the line joining the object of interest and the fovea, and which passes through the nodal points. These and the other axes are discussed in greater detail in Chapter
4.
Binocular vision and binocular overlap
The use of two eyes provides better perception of the external world than one eye
Centre-of-rotation
The eye rotates in its socket under the action of the six extra-ocular muscles. Because of the way these muscles are positioned and operate, there is no unique centre-of-rotation;
Figure 1.6. The horizontal field of view in monocular and binocular vision.
alone. Binocular vision improves contrast sensitivity and visual acuity slightly over those obtained with monocular vision (Campbell and Green, 1965;Home, 1978).Two
laterally displaced eyes give the potential for a three-dimensional view of the world, which
includes the perception of depth known as stereopsis. The degree of stereopsis depends partly upon the distance between the two eyes, which is called the interpupillary distance. Stereopsis can be improved considerably by optical devices such as rangefinders, which increase the effective
interpupillary distance.
Interpupillary distance
The interpupillary distance, or PO, is usually measured by the distance between the centres of the two pupils of the eyes. The distance PO is measured for the eyes looking straight ahead; that is, the visual axes are parallel. When the eyes focus on nearby objects, the eyes rotate inwards and hence there is a corresponding decrease in interpupillary distance. The near PO can then be measured or determined from the distance PO using
simple trigonometry.
Harvey (1982) provided distance POs for various armed services. Means ranged from
Tile /ullflan eye: an overview |
9 |
61 to 65 mm, with standard deviations of 3-4 mm. These values were mainly for men.
Binocular overlap
As shown in Figure 1.6, the total field-of-view in the horizontal plane is about 2100 with a 1200 binocular overlap.
Typical dimensions
All dimensions of the eye vary greatly between individuals. Some depend upon accommodation and age. Representative data are shown in Figure 1.7. Average values have
been used to construct representative or schematic eyes, which we discuss in Chapter 5. More detailed data are presented in later chapters.
Summary of main symbols
Fequivalent power of the eye
n' refractive index of vitreous humour (usually taken as 1.336)
Rradius of curvature in millimetres
F, F' |
front and back focal points |
N, N' front and back nodal points |
|
P, P' |
front and back principal points |
"-+----- |
16 ----- |
I 24 |
Figure 1.7. Representative dimensions (millimetres) and refractive indices of the (relaxed) eye. The starred values depend upon accommodation.
10 Basic optical structure of II/(' 11/111/1111 e)/e
References
Campbell, F. W. and Green, D. G. (1965). Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nil/lire, 208,
191-2.
Curcio, C. A. and Hendrickson, A. E. (1991). Organization
and development of the primate photoreceptor mosaic.
Prog. Retinal Res., 10, 89-120.
Fry, G. A. and Hill, W. W. (1962). The center of rotation of the eye. Alii. f. OptOIll. Arc/I. Am. Acad. OptOIll., 39,
581-95.
Harvey, R. S. (1982). Some statistics of interpupillary distance. Optician, 184 (4766), 29.
Hogan, M. J., Alvarado, J. A. and Weddell, J. E. (1971).
Histology of theHuman Eye. W. B.Saunders and Co. Home, R. (1978). Binocular summation: A study of
contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and recognition.
Visioll Res., 18, 579-85.
O'Brien, B. (1951). Vision and resolution in the central retina. }. Opt. Soc. Alii.,41, 882-94.
0sterberg, G. (1935). Topography of the layers of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthal. (Suppl.), 6,
1-103.
Polyak, S. L. (1941). The Retina,
Chicago Press.
Snell, R. S. and Lemp, M. A. (1997).
E)/(', 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Tyler,C. W.(1996). Analysis of human receptor density. In
Basic alld Clinical Applications of Vision Science, The Professor fay M. Enoch Festschrift Volume (V.
Lakshminarayanan, ed.), pp. 63-71. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2
Refracting components: cornea and lens
Introduction
The refracting elements of the eye are the
cornea and the lens. In order to provide a good quality retinal image, these elements must be transparent and have appropriate curvatures and refractive indices. Refraction
takes place at four surfaces, the anterior and posterior interfaces of the cornea and the lens,
|
Epithelium |
|
Tear film |
Bowman'smembrane |
|
~Stroma |
||
|
||
|
~Decemet's membrane |
|
Air |
--- Endotheliurn |
- Aqueoushumour
p' p
and there is also continuous refraction within the lens.
In this chapter we describe the optical
structure of the normal cornea and lens, but we must be aware that in many eyes there are
significant departures from these norms. Some of these are due to serious ocular defects or irregularities, which can have a major impact on vision. There are also changes with
age, and any descriptions given in this section relate only to mean adult values. More detail
on age dependencies is given in Chapter 20.
Cornea
The majority of the refracting power is provided by the cornea, the clear, curved 'window' at the front of the eye. It has about two-thirds of the total power for the relaxed eye, but this fraction decreases as the lens increases in power during accommodation.
Anatomical structure
Figure 2.1. The structure of the cornea and the approximate positions of the principal points.
The schematic cross-sectional structure of the cornea is shown in Figure 2.1. It has a tear film at its front surface, and several distinct parts. These are, in order from the outer sur-
face of the eye, the epithelium, Bowman's membrane, the stroma, Descemet's membrane and the endothelium. Approximate
thicknesses of these components are given in Table 2.1.
12 Basic optical structureof the human <'!Ie
Table 2.1. Thicknesses (um) of comeallayers (Hogan et al.,1971).
Tear film |
4-7 |
Epithelium |
50 |
Bowman's membrane |
8-14 |
Stroma" |
500 |
Descemet's membrane |
}0-12 |
Endothelium |
5 |
Total |
- 580 |
'The stroma thickens by at least an additional 150urn from the centre to the edge of the cornea.
The tear film is 4-71J.m thick (Tomlinson, 1992). It is composed of oily, aqueous and
mucous layers, with 98 per cent of the thickness being provided by the aqueous layer. The tear film is essential for clear vision
because it moistens the cornea and smooths out the 'roughness' of the surface epithelial cells. The tear film does not contribute
significant refractive power itself, since it is very thin and consists effectively of two very
closely spaced surfaces of almo~t equal.radi,i. However, the importance of this tear film 1S
realized if it dries out. If this occurs, the transparency of the cornea decreases
significantly.
The epithelium protects the rest of the cornea by providing a barrier against water, larger molecules and toxic substances. It consists of approximately six layers of cell~, and only the innermost layer of these cells 1S able to divide. After cells are formed, they move gradually towards the surface as the
superficial cells are shed.
Bowman's membrane is 8-141J.m thick, and consists mainly of randomly arranged
collagen fibrils.
The stroma comprises 90 per cent of the
corneal thickness, and consists mainly of 200 or more collagen lamellae. The collagen fibrils within each lamella run parallel to each other, and the successive lamellae run across the cornea at angles to each other. This arrange-
ment maintains an ordered transparent structure while enhancing mechanical
strength.
Descemet's membrane is the basement
membrane of the endothelial cells.
The endothelium consists of a single layer
of cells, which are hexagonal and fit together like a honeycomb. The endothelium regulates the fluid balance of the cornea in order to
maintain the stroma at about 78 per cent hydration and thus retain transparency.
Refractive index
Each corneal layer has its own refractive index, but since the stroma is by far the
thickest layer, its refractive index dominates. The mean value of refractive index is usually taken as 1.376.
Radii of curvature, vertex powers and total corneal power
Several studies have measured the anterior
radius of curvature, but there have been far fewer investigations of the rear surface. Experimental distributions of the vertex radii
(R) of curvature are given in Table 2.2.Similar
results have been obtained by various investigators for the anterior cornea, but clearly there is a reasonable degree of
variation between patients, and females have
slightly steeper anterior corneas than males. There is a high linear correlation between the anterior and posterior radii of curvature (Lowe and Clark, 1973; Dunne et ai., 1992; Patel et ai., 1993) and a reasonable fit of this relationship is
Rz=0.81R} |
(2.1) |
From these radii of curvature, we can calculate the surface powers (F) using the equation
F =(n' - n)/R |
(2.2) |
where nand n' are the refractive indices on the incident and refracted side, respectively. At the anterior surface
/1 = 1 and /1' = 1.376
and at the posterior surface n =1.376and n' =1.336
Surface power values, using these data and equations, are given in Table 2.2.
The total power F of the cornea can be calculated from the 'thick lens' equation:
F =F} + Fz- F}Fzd/J1 |
(2.3) |
where F} is the anterior surface power, Fz is
Refracting components: cornea and lens 13
Table 2.2. Population distributions of corneal vertex radii of curvature R and corresponding powers calculated from
equations (2.2)and (2.3),assuming corneal refractive index 1.376,aqueous refractive index 1.336and a corneal thickness 0.5 mm. Where results were provided for more than one meridian, mean values have been used.
|
SIN |
Anterior |
|
Posterior |
|
Total |
|
R(mm) |
F(D) |
R(mm) |
F(D) |
F(D) |
|
Donders (1864) |
38/- |
7.80 |
48.2 |
|
|
|
females |
|
|
|
|||
males |
79/- |
7.86 |
47.9 |
|
|
|
Stenstrom (1948) |
-/1000 |
7.86 ±0.26 |
47.8 |
|
|
|
Sorsby et al. (1957) |
-/194 |
7.82 ±0.29 |
48.1 |
|
|
|
Lowe and Clark (1973) |
46/92 |
7.65 ±0.27 |
49.2 |
6.46 ± 0.26 |
--6.2 |
43.2 |
Kiely et al. (1982) |
88/176 |
7.72 ±0.27 |
48.7 |
|
|
|
Edmund and Sj0ntoft (1985) |
40/80 |
7.76 ±0.25 |
48.5 |
|
|
|
Guillon et al. (1986) |
110/220 |
7.78±0.25 |
48.3 |
|
|
|
Koretz et al.(1989) |
|
7.69 ±0.23 |
48.9 |
|
|
|
females |
68/· |
|
|
|
||
males |
32/- |
7.78 ±0.24 |
48.3 |
|
|
|
Dunne et al. (1992) |
40/40 |
7.93 ±0.20 |
48.0 |
|
|
|
females |
6.53 ± 0.20 |
--6.1 |
42.0 |
|||
males |
40/40 |
8.08 ±0.16 |
47.1 |
6.65 ± 0.16 |
--6.0 |
41.2 |
Patel et al. (1993) |
20/20 |
7.68 ±0.40 |
49.0 |
5.81 ± 0.41 |
--6.9 |
42.2 |
Mean (unweighted) |
|
7.83 |
48.0 |
6.34 |
--6.3 |
|
5 = number of subjects; N = number of eyes; - = number not provided.
the posterior surface power, d is the vertex corneal thickness and Jl is the refractive index of the cornea (usually taken as 1.376). The
power of the cornea can be estimated from the sum of the surface powers
F "" F1 + F2 |
(2.3a) |
This value is different from the exact value by
an amount FIF2d/u. Using the data given by Patel et al. (1993) in Table 2.2, a corneal thickness of 0.5 mm and a refractive index of
1.376, the exact equation (2.3) gives a corneal power of 42.20 and the approximate equation (2.3a) gives a slightly lower value of 42.1 D.
The above surface power values apply to
the vertices of the cornea, and would apply to other parts of the corneal surfaces only if they were spherical. However, neither the anterior
nor the posterior surfaces are perfectly
spherical due to both toricity and asphericity. Therefore, the radii of curvature do not fully
describe the shape of the cornea and its refracting properties.
Anterior surface shape
Toricity
Frequently the anterior corneal surface
exhibits toricity, which produces astigmatism. In young eyes, the radius of curvature is generally greater in the horizontal than in the
vertical meridian (referred as 'with the rule'), but this trend reverses with an increase in age.
Asphericity
In general, the radius of curvature increases with distance from the surface apex, so that the surface flattens away from the apex. Surfaces that are non-spherical in this sense are often described as aspheric.
The shape of the anterior corneal surface has been extensively studied, especially over the central 8 mm of its approximately 12 mm diameter. This central 'optical' zone is the maximum zone of the cornea through which
light passes to form the foveal image. To
investigate the shape over this zone, corneal surfaces are often represented by conicoids in
three dimensions or conics in two dimensions. A conicoid can be expressed in the form
h2 + (1+Q)Z2 - 2ZR =0 |
(2.4) |
where
the Z axis is the optical axis h2 =)(2 + y2
R is the vertex radius of curvature and
14 Basic optical structureof tileIIulllan eye
Q is the surface asphericity, where
Q< -1 specifies a hyperboloid
Q=-1 specifies a paraboloid
-1 < Q < 0 specifies an ellipsoid, with the Z-axis being the major axis
Q= 0 specifies a sphere
Q> 0 specifies an ellipsoid with the major axis in the X-Y plane.
The effect of the value and sign of Qon the shape is shown in Figure 2.2. Sometimes asphericity is expressed in terms of a quantity p, which is related to Q by the equation
p =(1+Q) |
(2.5) |
The conicoid form described by equation (2.4) is not the only mathematical representation used in the literature to describe conic(oid)s. Many investigators have measured surface shapes separately in different sections, and fitted the data to ellipses, which can be described by the equation
(Z _a)2 |
+ £ = 1 |
(2.6) |
a2 |
b2 |
|
where a and b are ellipse axes' semi-lengths. The shape of such ellipses is often described by the eccentricity e,which is related to a and
b by the equation
e2 = 1 - b2/ a2 |
(2.7) |
provided that the Z-axis is the major axis. Equation (2.6) can be transformed easily
into the form of equation (2.4). If we do this, we find that the vertex radius of curvature R is related to a and b by the equation
R = + b2/ a |
(2.8) |
and that the asphericity Q is given by the equation
Q=b2/ a2-1 |
(2.9) |
It follows from equations (2.7) and (2.9), that
the quantities e and Q are related by the equation
Q =- e2 |
(2.10) |
Specifying asphericity using e is not
completely satisfactory because e2 may be negative, in which case e cannot have a value.
Other forms of representing corneal shape are described in Chapter 16. More complex forms are important to describe the shape of
the cornea accurately, especially outside the optical zone.
Measured values of the anterior corneal
y |
Hyperboloids:Q < -I |
|
• |
Paraboloid: Q = -1.0 |
|
Ellipsoids: O>Q>-I
\
\
\
z
Figure 2.2. The effect of asphericity on the shape of a conicoid. All the curves have the same apex radius of curvature.
Refracting components: cornea andlens 15
Table 2.3. Summary of asphericity data for the anterior surface of the cornea.
|
No.ofsubjects/eyes |
Q |
s.d.or range |
Lotmar (1971)(using Bonnet (1964)'s data) |
|
-0.286 |
|
EIHage and Berny (1973) |
1/1 |
+0.16 |
|
Mandell and St Helen (1971) |
8/8 |
-0.23 |
-0.04 to -0.72 |
Kiely et al. (1982) |
88/176 |
-0.26 |
0.18 |
Edmund and Sj"ntoft (1985) |
40/80 |
-0.28 |
0.13 |
Guillon et al. (1986)' |
110/220 |
-0.18 |
0.15 |
Patel et al, (1993) |
20/20 |
-0.01 |
0.25 |
Lam and Douthwaite (1997) |
60/60 |
-0.30 |
0.13 |
"The mean of the steepest and shallowest meridians.
asphericity (Q) are given in Table 2.3. The
values of Q are usually negative, indicating that the cornea flattens away from the vertex.
Figure 2.3 shows the profiles of corneal surfaces, all with a radius of curvature of 7.8 mm but with different Q values.
Optical significance of corneal asphericity
There has been considerable speculation as to why the cornea flattens away from the centre.
It has been argued that the cornea flattens in order to reduce spherical aberration, and
certainly the flattening does lead to a lower spherical aberration, but the amount of asphericity in the average cornea is not sufficient to eliminate it. The value of Q
5
<)
u
§ 2
'iii
is
~Q=-o.26
--tr- Q =-0.52
---III-- Q =-1.0
o..-.........--,---.-,---.--+-
o I 32
Distance along optical axis (mm)
Figure 2.3. The anterior surface of a cornea with a vertex radius of curvature of 7.8 rom, with various values of the asphericity Q.
required to eliminate spherical aberration at the anterior surface is -0.528, given a corneal refractive index of 1.376. Perhaps an important reason for the flattening is the need for the cornea to make a smooth join with the main globe of the eye.
Off-axis radii of curvature
The radius of curvature at any point on a
spherical surface and in any meridian is the same. However, for a conicoid surface, the
radius of curvature at off-axis points depends not only upon the distance from the vertex, but also on the meridian at that point. There are two principal meridians: the tangential meridian, which lies along the radius line from the vertex, and the sagittal meridian,
which is perpendicular to the tangential meridian. For conicoids, the corresponding equations for the sagittal radius of curvature
(Rs) and the tangential radius of curvature (Rt) |
|
are |
|
Rs =[R2 - Qy2F12 |
(2.11a) |
and |
|
Rt = [R2 - Qy2]312/R2 = Rs3/R2 |
(2.11b) |
Figure 2.4 shows changes in Rt and Rswith distance Y from the corneal vertex for an asphericity Q value of -0.18 (Guillon et al.,
1986) and a vertex radius of curvature of 7.8 mm.
An alternative name for the tangential radius of curvature is the instantaneous radius of curvature, while the sagittal radius
of curvature is also called the axial radius of curvature. Unfortunately, this last term may
be readily confused with the vertex radius of curvature.
16Basic optical structureof thehUlllall eye
8.7+--_...J-__--'-__....L-__- L__-t-
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
I |
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
Tangential |
|
|
|
|
Sagittal |
|
|
|
||
~ |
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
~ |
8.2 |
|
|
|
|
~ |
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
ce |
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
'" |
|
|
|
|
|
= |
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
~ |
|
|
|
|
|
IX |
7.9 |
|
.., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 +----r----r----,----,----t- |
||||
|
o |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Distance from corneal vertex (mm)
Figure 2.4. The radii of curvature in the sagittal and tangential directions of a cornea with a vertex radius of
curvature of 7.8 mm and a corneal asphericity of Q= -{l.18, from Guillon et al. (1986).
Posterior surface shape
This is difficult to measure because of the influence of anterior surface shape on any measurement. It is of lesser significance than
the anterior surface shape because of the small refractive index difference across the posterior corneal boundary, but it is not of negligible
significance.
Patel etal. (1993) estimated the shape of the posterior surface of 20 corneas from measured
anterior surface shapes and peripheral values of corneal thickness. For the 20 subjects, they
found a mean posterior vertex radius of 5.8 mm and a mean asphericity of Q = -0.42. However, Patel and co-workers used a mean
anterior corneal shape that was almost spherical (Q =-0.01) and therefore much less
aspheric than found in other studies. Lam and Douthwaite (1997) used a similar approach with a group of 60 young Chinese in Hong
Kong, and obtained asphericity of Q =-0.66 ± 0.38. In this case, the anterior surface
asphericity was Q=-0.31 ± 0.13.
Positions of the principal points
the anterior and posterior surfaces, the corneal thickness and the refractive indices.
Representative positions are shown in Figure
2.1. Note that both principal points are in front of the cornea.
Lens
Figure 2.5 shows a cross-section of the lens. The lens bulk is a mass of cellular tissue of non-uniform gradient index, contained within an elastic capsule. We do not have an accurate measure of this index distribution. There is a layer of epithelial cells, extending from the
anterior pole of the lens to the equator. The
lens grows continually throughout life, with new epithelial cells forming at the equator.
These cells elongate as fibres that wrap around the periphery of the lens, under the
capsule and epithelium, to meet at sutures. The older fibres lose their nuclei and other intracellular organelles. Because of the continual growth of the lens throughout life, lenticular parameters are age-dependent.
The lens capsule plays an important role in the accommodation process. It is attached to the ciliary body via the zonules, as shown in a simplified fashion in Figure 2.6. Contraction
of the ciliary muscle within the ciliary body leads to changes in zonular tension, which
alter lens shape. This process causes a change in the equivalent power of the lens and hence
apsule
Lens bulk
p'
p
The positions of the principal points of the cornea depend upon the radii of curvatures of
Figure 2.5. Cross-section of the lens showing the approximate positions of its principal points.
