Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Optics Learning by Computing with Examples using MATLAB_Dieter Moller_2007
.pdf
C H A P T E R
Maxwell II.
Modes and Mode
Propagation
6.1 INTRODUCTION
In the chapter on interference we discussed the resonance mode of a Fabry– Perot. We found that all light was transmitted for a specific wavelength λ and separation D of the Fabry–Perot plates. The condition for generation of the modes was D mλ/2, where m was an integer.
The modes may be considered as a standing wave. A standing wave can be described by the superposition of two traveling waves moving in opposite directions. The standing waves are characterized by m + 1 nonmoving nodes, including both nodes on the Fabry–Perot plates. Between the nodes, the amplitudes oscillate from maximum to minimum. A rectangular box of dimensions a, b, c with reflecting walls (Figure 6.1) has three pairs of parallel plates in the x, y, and z directions. Each pair may be considered as a Fabry–Perot. The walls are assumed to be perfectly reflecting, and the boundary conditions for the mode formation are required to have nodes at the walls. Using plane wave solutions, the modes are represented by sine functions. For the x direction, we have at length a of the box that sin(2πa/λx ) 0 or 2πa/λx π. A similar result is found for the y and z directions and we have three standing wave conditions
a n1λx /2, |
b n2λy /2, |
c n3λz/2. |
(6.1) |
Since the ni s are integers, and a, b, c are constants, the possible values of the wavelengths are restricted. Using wave vectors, Eqs. (6.1) may be written as
kx πn1/a ky πn2/b kz πn3/c. |
(6.2) |
These are the wave vectors for the three components of a general mode of the box. The corresponding wave vector is obtained by vector addition of the three
249
250 |
6. MAXWELL II. MODES AND MODE PROPAGATION |
FIGURE 6.1 Coordinates for the discussion of the modes of a box with reflecting walls and dimensions a, b, c.
components of Eq. (6.2). For the square of the scalar value one gets
k2 π2{(n1/a)2 + (n2/b)2 + (n3/c)2}. |
(6.3) |
The corresponding wave is a product of three standing waves in the three directions x, y, and z. The standing waves have fixed nodes, and the number of nodes is related to the values of ni as (1 + ni ) for i 1, 2, 3. Therefore, the number of nodes may be used for the characterization of the modes. In FileFig 6.1 the first two graphs show the one-dimension standing waves for the x and y directions for the case of nx 2 and ny 2. The third and fourth graphs are the contour, and surface plots of the amplitude for Mi,k with i 2 and k 2 and the fifth and sixth graph, show the intensity. In the third through sixth graphs we see six node lines.
FileFig 6.1 (N1RECBOX)
Graphs of sine functions in one and two dimensions with nodes depending on the integers n1, n2. The modes are numbered by Mik, where i gives the number of nodes in the x direction and k in the y direction. Note that the node lines are the same for the graphs of amplitude and intensity.
6.1. INTRODUCTION |
251 |
N1RECBOX
Modes of the Rectangular Box in Two Dimensions
Standing sine waves in x and y directions. Mode number constants. x direction n1 and a; y direction n2 and b. The wave in each direction is shown as well as contour and surface plots. The square is also shown as surface plot.
i : 0 . . . N |
j : 0 . . . N |
|
|
||||||
xi : (−40) + 2.001 · i |
yj : (−40) + 2.0001 · j |
||||||||
λ1 : 2 · |
|
a |
λ2 : 2 · |
b |
|
|
|||
n1 |
|
n2 |
|
|
|
||||
y1(x) : sin 2 · π · |
x |
y2(y) : sin 2 · π · |
y |
||||||
|
|
|
. |
||||||
λ1 |
λ2 |
||||||||
1. One dimension
2. Amplitude, 2 D
M11i,j : y1(xi ) · y2(yj ) n1 ≡ 2 a ≡ 40 n2 ≡ 2 b ≡ 40 N ≡ 20.
252 |
6. MAXWELL II. MODES AND MODE PROPAGATION |
3. Intensity, 2D
MM11i,j : (y1(xi ) · y2(yj ))2.
Application 6.1.
1.Print out M00, M01, M10, M11, and M22.
2.Make graphs of M00, M01, M10, and M11, using a cosine function for x. The corresponding boundary condition would be an “open end" of the box.
3.Make graphs of M00, M01, M10, and M11, using cosine functions for x and y.
6.2STRATIFIED MEDIA
In the chapter on geometrical optics we discussed image formation with spherical mirrors. We also discussed astronomical telescopes composed of an objective lens and magnifiers. Lenses always reflect some of the incident light, according to Fresnel’s formulas. To reduce the reflection, an antireflection coating was developed. A thin film of a specific material was vacuum-deposited on the lens surface, preventing most of the incident light of a specific wavelength from being reflected. In the same chapter we also discussed laser cavities. The mirrors of a laser cavity need to have high reflectivity only for a limited wavelength range, but the reflectivity should be close to one in order to obtain a high gain.
In this section we show that stacks of dielectric layers may have very high reflectance or transmittance. Applications are antireflection coatings of lenses and mirrors for laser cavities with extremely high reflectivity. We study the
6.2. STRATIFIED MEDIA |
253 |
FIGURE 6.2 Three media of index of refraction n1 1, n2, and n3. In each medium we consider a forward and a backward traveling wave.
reflection and transmission of light incident on stacks of dielectric layers. All layers have the thickness d (1/4)(λ/n) n/4λ, but some may have different refractive indices from others.
6.2.1 Two Interfaces at Distance d
When calculating Fresnel’s formulas, we equated the fields on both sides of a boundary and obtained a set of linear equations for the amplitudes of the reflection and the transmission coefficients. This method is called the boundary value method and is now applied to two interfaces at distance d. In the chapter on interference we studied the plane parallel plate and summed up all reflected and transmitted waves. This method is called the summation method and is less rigorous than the boundary value method. We consider three media and assume normal incident light. In each medium we assume forward and backward traveling waves (Figure 6.2). We do not show the time dependence of the waves, giving us these equations for incident, reflected, and transmitted waves at the two interfaces:
1. before the first interface
|
Ei A1 exp ik1(+Y ) |
incident |
(6.4) |
||
2. |
Er |
A1 exp ik1(−Y ) |
reflected, |
(6.5) |
|
after the first interface |
|
|
|
||
|
Et |
A2 exp ik2(+Y ) |
transmitted after 1 |
(6.6) |
|
3. |
Er |
A2 exp ik2(−Y ) |
reflected back to 1, |
(6.7) |
|
after the second interface |
|
|
|
||
|
Et A3 exp ik3 |
(+Y ) |
transmitted after 2 |
(6.8) |
|
|
Er A3 exp ik3 |
(−Y ) |
reflected back to 2. |
(6.9) |
|
We take the electrical field vector perpendicular to the plane of incidence, which is the case of perpendicular polarization discussed in Chapter 5. We first
254 |
6. MAXWELL II. MODES AND MODE PROPAGATION |
take into account the electrical field vectors at boundary 1, where Y 0. The sum of Eqs. (6.4) and (6.5) is equal to the sum of Eqs. (6.6) and (6.7). At the boundary for Y d the sum of Eqs. (6.6) and (6.7) is equal to the sum of Eqs. (6.8) and (6.9). We obtain the following equations
|
|
|
A1 + A1 A2 |
+ A2 |
|
(6.10) |
|||
A |
eikd |
+ |
A e−ikd |
|
A |
eik d |
+ |
A e−ik d , |
(6.11) |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
|
3 |
|
|||
where k 2πn2/λ, k 2πn3/λ, and d is the distance between the two interfaces. In a similar manner we obtain a second set of two equations for the B-fields. This is similar to the calculations of Fresnel’s formulas in Chapter 5, applying the corresponding boundary conditions for the B-field at Y 0 and
Y d.
|
|
|
|
− |
A |
1 + |
A |
n |
A |
2 |
+ |
n |
A |
(6.12) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
− 2 |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
||||
n |
A |
eikd |
+ |
n |
|
A e−ikd |
n |
A |
3 |
eik d |
+ |
n |
A e−ik d . (6.13) |
||||
− 2 |
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
− 3 |
|
|
|
3 |
3 |
|||||
In order to derive a vector-matrix formulation, we abbreviate the sum of the amplitudes before the first boundary (Eq. (6.10)), by E1,d 0. Since Eq. (6.11) was derived using the magnetic field vector we call the amplitude B1,d 0. In a similar way we use E2,d 0 and B2,d 0 for the sum of the amplitudes after the first boundary. For the amplitudes before and after the second boundary, we use E2,d d and B2,d d , and E3,d d and B3,d d , respectively. We may now write
|
|
|
E1,d 0 A1 + A1 A2 + A2 |
E2,d 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.14) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
B1,d 0 −A1 + A1 −n2A2 + n2A2 B2,d 0 |
|
|
|
(6.15) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
E |
2,d d |
|
A |
eikd |
+ |
A e−ikd |
|
A |
eik d |
+ |
A e−ik d |
|
E |
3,d d |
(6.16) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
B2,d d |
−n2A2eikd + n2A2e−ikd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
A |
eik d |
+ |
n |
A e−ik d |
|
B |
3,d d |
. |
|
|
|
|
(6.17) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
− |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Equations (6.14) and (6.15) may be written in matrix notation as |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Field |
1,d 0 |
|
|
E1,d 0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
A1 |
|
|
M |
1,0 |
A |
1 |
(6.14) and (6.15) |
||||||||||
|
|
B1,d |
|
0 |
− |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Field |
2,d 0 |
|
|
E2,d 0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
A2 |
|
|
M |
2,0 |
A |
2 |
(6.14) and (6.15) |
||||||||||
|
|
B2,d |
|
0 |
− |
n2 |
|
|
+ |
n2 |
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
and have |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
M2,0A2 M1,0A1 or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A2 M2−,10M1,0A1 M2−,10Field1,d 0. |
|
|
|
|
(6.18) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Equations (6.16) and (6.17) may be written in matrix notation as |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Field2,d d |
|
|
eikd |
|
|
|
|
|
e−ikd |
|
|
A2 |
M2,dA2 |
(6.16) and (6.17) |
|||||||||||||||||
− |
n2eikd |
|
|
+ |
n2e−ikd |
|
A |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
6.2. STRATIFIED MEDIA |
255 |
Field3,d d |
|
eik d |
e−ik d |
A3 |
M3,dA3 (6.16) and (6.17) |
|
− |
n3eik d |
n3e−ik d |
A |
|||
and we have |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field3,d d |
M3,dA3 |
M2,dA2. |
|
|
(6.19) |
|
We want to express the vector Field3,d d as the product of matrices times the vector Field1,d 0, and have
Field3,d d M2,dA2 M2,dM2−,10Field1,d 0. |
(6.20) |
The manipulation of the matrices is shown in FileFig 6.2.
FileFig 6.2 (N2SYMATR)
Demonstration of the matrix manipulations and multiplication of M2,d M2−,01 and the resulting matrix M2.
M2 |
|
|
|
− |
cos(kd) |
−i sin(kd)/n2 . |
|
|
|
(6.21) |
|||
|
|
|
n2i sin(kd) |
cos(kd) |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
N2SYMATR is only on the CD. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
The final result is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
E3,d d |
|
|
− |
|
cos(kd) |
−i sin(kd)/n2 |
E1,d 0 . |
(6.22) |
|||||
B3,d |
|
d |
|
n2i sin(kd) |
cos(kd) |
B1,d |
|
0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Using this matrix approach, we discuss some applications.
6.2.2 Plate of Thickness d (λ/2n2)
We apply Eq. (6.22) to a plate of thickness d (λ/2n2)q, where q is an integer. The thickness of the plate is a multiple of half a wavelength divided by the refractive index n2 of the material of the plate. Using k 2πn2/λ and d (λ/2n2)q we have for the product kd qπ. At the boundary we have for the exponentials e−ik d e−ikd . Both are 1 for even q. Equation (6.22) is now
E3,d d |
1 |
0 |
E1,d 0 . |
(6.23) |
||||
B3,d |
|
d |
0 |
1 |
B1,d |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
The matrix M is the unit matrix and the result is that the medium of thickness d has no effect on the transmitted fields. The same result is obtained when q is odd. A similar result has been obtained in Chapter 2 for the plane parallel plate. All incident power of the particular wavelength λ will be transmitted when the plate has the thickness d (λ/2n2)q.
256 |
6. MAXWELL II. MODES AND MODE PROPAGATION |
6.2.3 Plate of Thickness d and Index n2
We apply Eq. (6.22) to a plate of thickness d with refractive index n2. We also assume that there is no backwards traveling wave in medium 3 and that the refractive indices of the first and third media are assumed to be 1. We then have
A3eik d |
|
cos(kd) |
− |
i sin(kd)/n2 |
A1 |
+ |
A |
|
. (6.24) |
||||
|
A3eik d |
|
n2i sin(kd) |
cos(kd) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
||||
− |
− |
|
− |
A1 |
+ |
A |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|||||
In FileFig 6.3 we calculate the transmitted intensity of a plane parallel plate. Calling x A1/A1 and y A3/A1 and observing that eik d 1, we have R xx for the reflected intensity and T yy for the transmitted intensity. Equation (6.24) is a system of two linear equations in x and y and is solved for x and y. The result for T is
T 1/[1 + {(n2 − 1)2/4n2}(sin(kd)2]. |
(6.25) |
Here we can use T for the transmitted intensity because we have assumed that the refractive index in the first medium is n1 1. This is the same result one obtains with the summation method for the case of normal incidence, discussed in Chapter 2.
FileFig 6.3 (N3SYMATPL)
Calculation of the transmitted intenstiy T of a plane parallel plate of thickness d with indices outside the plate equal to 1. We use x A1/A1 and y A3/A1 and have T yy for the transmitted intensity and R xx for the reflected intensity.
N3SYMATPL is only on the CD.
Application 6.3.
1.Calculate the reflected intensity R.
2.Make graphs for T and R in the wavelength range from 1 to 20 microns. Use for d values equal to kd qπ, one for q even and one for q odd.
3.Make graphs for T for two different refractive indices between 1.1 and 4 in the wavelength range from 1 to 20 microns. Use for the thickness d values not equal to kd qπ, q even or odd.
6.2.4 Antireflection Coating
Antireflection coating may be found on camera lenses. A thin dielectric film of refractive index n2 is vacuum-deposited on the surface of a lens of refractive index n3. We assume for the film a thickness λ/(4n2). The light is incident from a
6.2. STRATIFIED MEDIA |
257 |
medium with index n1 and the product kd in Eq. (6.22) is [(2πn2/λ)(λ/4n2)] π/2. One gets
|
A3eik d |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
− |
i/n2 |
|
|
A1 |
+ |
A |
|
. |
(6.26) |
|||||
|
n3A3eik d |
|
|
|
n2i |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
||||||||
− |
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
n1A1 |
+ |
n1A |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|||||||
Because eik d i one has |
− |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
1 + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
iA |
3 |
|
( |
|
2 |
)( |
1 |
A |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.27) |
||||
|
− 3 |
|
|
− |
i/n |
|
n |
|
n |
A ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
iA |
3 |
( |
2 |
)(A |
1 + |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.28) |
||||||
|
n |
|
|
|
in |
|
|
A ). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 and have |
|
To get to the condition for no reflection, we set the ratio A |
/A1 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
A3/A1 n1/n2 n2/n3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.29) |
|||||||
or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n1n3 n22. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.30) |
|
We have the result: the antireflection film of a thickness of a quarter-wavelength must have a refractive index equal to the square root of the product of the refractive index on both sides. Let us consider a glass lens of index n3 1.5. The incident light travels in the medium with n1 1 and n3 1.5 being the index of the lens. The square root of the product is 1.22. A material with exactly that refractive index is hard to find, but material with approximately that value is used for antireflection coating.
In FileFig 6.4 we calculate from Eqs. (6.27) and (6.28) the reflection coefficient r A1/A1 and the transmission coefficient t A3/A1 and investigate the reflected and transmitted intensities. Using rr R and tt , the sum R + tt is not 1. However, if we use the correct expression for T (see Chapter 5), we show that (n3/n1)tt is equal to T and that one has R + T 1. The graph in FileFig 6.4 shows a plot of the antireflection coating depending on the refractive index n2.
FileFig 6.4a (N4SYMULANTa)
Antireflection coating. The reflected amplitude r A1/A1 and the transmitted amplitude t A3/A1 as solutions of Eq. (6.26). The products rr and tt are also calculated.
FileFig 6.4b (N4SYMULANTb)
Numerical calculations.
258 |
6. MAXWELL II. MODES AND MODE PROPAGATION |
1.Special case of zero thickness for demonstration of reflected and transmitted intensities.
2.Antireflection coating. Graph of reflected intensity depending on the refractive index of the coating.
N4SYMULANTa and N4SYMULANTb are only on the CD.
Application 6.5.
1.Using the correct expression for T (see chapter 5), derive formulas for the transmitted and reflected intensities for one interface with refractive indices n1 and n2 1. Show that T + R 1.
2.Find the refractive index for an antireflection coating material for silicon
(n 3.4).
3.Use polyethylene (n 1.5) as a coating of silicon and calculate the percentage of reflected amplitude and intensity.
6.2.5Multiple Layer Filters with Alternating High and Low Refractive Index
High-reflecting dielectric mirrors are composed of a large number of dielectric layers with alternating high and low refractive indices. We extend Eq. (6.22) to f − 1 layers of equal thickness and obtain
Ef,d d |
|
M |
f −1 |
M |
f −2 |
, . . . , |
E1,d 0 . |
(6.31) |
||||
Bf,d |
|
d |
|
|
|
B1,d |
|
0 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
For a rigorous derivation see Born and Wolf (1964; p.66).
We apply Eq. (6.31) to a sequence of double layers, consisting of a high and a low refractive index, assuming that the refractive index outside is 1. Assuming N double layers the sequence of the refractive indices is then
(n 1)(nH nL), . . . , (nH nL)(n 1). |
(6.32) |
The product of the matrices is |
|
(MH ML), . . . , (MH ML). |
(6.33) |
The thickness of one layer is assumed to be one-quarter of a wavelength and we have the product kd [(2πn2/λ)(λ/4n2)], resulting in sin(kd) 1 and cos(kd) 0. For one double layer we get for the product of MH times ML
−nL/nH |
0 |
(6.34) |
0 |
−nH /nL |
|
and for N double layers
(−nL/nH )N |
0 |
N . |
(6.35) |
0 |
(−nH /nL) |
|
|
