- •Pearls of Glaucoma Management
- •Optic Nerve: The Glaucomatous Optic Nerve
- •1.1 Why is the Optic Nerve Important in the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma?
- •1.1.1 The Optic Nerve Head (ONH) is the Principal Site of Glaucomatous Damage to the Visual System
- •1.1.3 The Clinical Appearance and Behavior of the ONH Holds Clues as to the Etiology of a Given Optic Neuropathy
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Optic Nerve: Clinical Examination
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •2.2 How Does One Establish the Borders of the Nerve and Follow the Neuroretinal Rim Contour?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •2.6 How Quickly Can I Expect Optic Nerve Change to Occur?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •2.7 If I See a Disc Hemorrhage on Healthy Appearing Neuroretinal Rim, How Soon Can I Expect to See a Change in the Rim?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Optic Nerve: Heidelberg Retinal Tomography
- •3.1 What Indices Should I Use to Help Me Interpret the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT) Printout?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •3.2 How Big a Change is Meaningful in the Numbers on an HRT Printout?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •3.3.1 Trend Analysis
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Optic Nerve: Scanning Laser Polarimetry
- •4.1 What is the Physical Principle Behind Scanning Laser Polarimetry (SLP)?
- •4.1.1 How has Scanning Laser Polarimetry Evolved?
- •4.1.2 What is GDxVCC (Variable Corneal Compensation)?
- •4.1.3 What is GDxECC (Enhanced Corneal Compensation)?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •4.2 How is Image Quality and Artifact Assessed on the GDxVCC Printout?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •4.4.1 Detection of Progression with SLP
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Optic Nerve: Optical Coherence Tomography
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •5.2 What Indices Should I Use to Help Me Interpret the “RNFL Thickness Average Analysis Report” Printout?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •5.4 Can I Use OCT Clinically to Diagnose Glaucoma? How Certain Can I Be that the Diagnosis is Real?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Optic Nerve: Comparison of Technologies
- •6.1 Why Image the Optic Nerve?
- •6.1.3 Scanning Laser Polarimetry (SLP)
- •Summary for the clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •6.3 Is One Imaging Technique Easier to Use and Interpret than Another?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •7.1 Should Peripapillary Atrophy (PPA) Concern Me? Should it Be Followed for Enlargement?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •7.2 In Examining Tilted Optic Discs, How Do I Distinguish Tilt vs. Glaucoma?
- •7.2.1 What are the Characteristics of a Tilted Disc?
- •7.2.5 What Management Strategy Can I Use in Equivocal Cases of Tilt vs. Glaucoma?
- •Summary for Clinicians
- •7.3 With Optic Nerve Head Drusen (OND), How Do I Tell If Visual Field Changes are due to Drusen vs. Glaucoma?
- •7.3.1 Description of Drusen
- •7.3.2 What are the Characteristics of Field Defects in OND?
- •7.3.3 Are There Other Signs that Can Help Me Distinguish Between OND and Glaucoma?
- •7.3.4 Can Imaging Help Me to Distinguish Between OND and Glaucoma?
- •7.3.5 What Management Strategy Can I Use in Equivocal Cases of OND vs. Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •7.4.1 What is the Significance of Disc Cupping?
- •7.4.3 What is the Significance of Optic Disc Pallor?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •8.1 Why is Intraocular Pressure Important in Diagnosing and Treating Glaucoma?
- •8.1.3 Non-IOP Factors May also Be Involved in the Pathogenesis of Glaucoma
- •8.1.4 The Decision to Initiate Treatment by Lowering IOP
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •IOP: Instruments to Measure IOP
- •9.2.1 Maklakov Tonometer
- •9.2.2 Shiøtz Tonometry
- •9.2.3 Goldmann Tonometry
- •9.2.4 McKay-Marg and Tonopen
- •9.2.5 Air-Puff Tonometry
- •9.2.6 Dynamic Contour Tonometry
- •9.2.7 Trans-Palpebral Tonometers
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •9.5 In Cases of Prosthetic Corneas How Can I Measure the IOP?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •IOP: Central Corneal Thickness
- •10.1.1 Goldmann Tonometry
- •10.1.2 The Influence of CCT on Tonometry
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •10.2.1 CCT in Different Populations
- •10.2.2 CCT Over Time
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •10.3 Does CCT Predict Glaucoma?
- •10.3.1 Clinical Trials
- •10.3.2 CCT in Established Glaucoma
- •10.3.3 CCT as a Biological Risk Factor
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •10.4.1 Should IOP Be “Adjusted” for CCT?
- •10.4.4 Should I Measure CCT in All Patients?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •IOP: Corneal Hysteresis
- •11.1 What is Corneal Hysteresis and How Does it Influence IOP Measurement?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •11.3 What Is the Relationship Between CCT, IOP, and Corneal Hysteresis?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •11.4 Should I Invest in Newer Devices to Measure IOP that Claim Less Influence of CCT?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •IOP: Target Pressures
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •12.2 If I Decide to Set a Target IOP, How Should I Set it – Do I Use a Percent Reduction or Aim Toward an Absolute Number?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •IOP: Fluctuation
- •13.1 Why is IOP Fluctuation a Topic of Interest?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •13.5 What is the Significance of Measures of Long-Term IOP Fluctuation?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •13.6 What is the Impact of Medication on Short-Term and Long-Term IOP Fluctuation?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •13.7 What is the Impact of Surgery on Short-Term and Long-Term IOP Fluctuation?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Gonioscopy: Why Do Indentation?
- •14.1 Which Patients Should have Gonioscopy?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •14.2 Of What Use is the Van Herick Angle Examination?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •14.3 What Lens Should be Used for Gonioscopy?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •14.5 What Should I Look for in the Angle?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •14.7 How Narrow is too Narrow? What are the Indications for Laser Iridotomy in a Patient with No Symptoms of Angle-closure?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •14.8 What Should I Know about Plateau Iris?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Visual Fields: Visual Field Test Strategies
- •15.1.1 Automated vs. Manual
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •15.3 Is There a Visual Field Program of Choice at This Point in Time?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •15.5 What Program is Best for Use in a General Clinic to Screen for Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •15.6 How Can I Convert from One Visual Field Strategy to Another to Help Me Interpret and Compare Tests?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •15.7 What Can be Done to Obtain Visual Field Information in a Patient who Consistently Tests Unreliably?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Visual Fields: Fluctuation and Progression
- •16.1 How Do I Distinguish Between Fluctuation and True Progressive Change on Visual Field Printouts?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •16.4 What Automated Progression Analysis Software Is Available to Help with Visual Field Interpretation?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Visual Fields: Field Interpretation
- •17.1 How Is Information on a Single Field Printout of the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer Interpreted?
- •17.1.1 Part 1 of the Visual Field Printout
- •17.1.2 Part 2 of the Visual Field Printout
- •17.1.3 Part 3 of the Visual Field Printout
- •17.1.4 Part 4 of the Visual Field Printout
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •17.2 How Is the Information on the Glaucoma Progression Analysis Printout Interpreted?
- •17.2.1 Part 1 of the GPA Printout
- •17.2.2 Part 2 of the GPA Printout
- •17.2.3 Part 3 of the GPA Printout
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •17.3.2 Automatic Reliance on the Statistical Analysis
- •17.3.3 Visual Field Artifacts
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Other Tests in Glaucoma: Genetic Testing
- •18.1.1 Anterior Segment Dysgenesis
- •18.1.3 Congenital Glaucoma
- •18.1.4 Low-Tension Glaucoma
- •18.1.6 Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •18.2 Are Genetic Tests for Glaucoma of Practical Use in a Clinical Setting Today, or Are They More of Theoretical Use?
- •18.2.1 Anterior Segment Dysgenesis
- •18.2.3 Congenital Glaucoma
- •18.2.4 Low-Tension Glaucoma
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •18.3 How Do I Collect Samples and Where Do I Send Them for Analysis?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •18.4.1 Genetic Counseling
- •18.4.3 Juvenile-Open Angle Glaucoma
- •18.4.4 Congenital Glaucoma
- •18.4.5 Low-Tension Glaucoma
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •19.2 Is Abnormal Ocular Blood Flow Causal in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Progression, and Does It Correlate with Disease Severity?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •19.3.1.2 Patients with Vasospasm
- •19.3.1.3 Patients with Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dips
- •19.3.1.4 Diabetes
- •19.3.2 Patients Who Progress despite Reaching Target IOP or with Fluctuating IOP and Pulse Pressure
- •19.3.3 NTG Patients with Migraine and or Disc Hemorrhages
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •19.4 What are the Most Common Techniques to Measure Optic Nerve Blood Flow and what are Their Limitations?
- •19.4.1 Color Doppler Imaging (CDI)
- •19.4.4 Angiography
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •20.1 What Evidence Is There that Vascular Alterations Play a Role in Open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG)?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •20.3.1 Color Doppler Imaging (CDI)
- •20.3.4 Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF)
- •20.3.5 Retinal Vessel Analyzer (RVA)
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •20.4.1 Color Doppler Imaging
- •20.4.2 Heidelberg Retinal Flowmeter
- •20.4.4 Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •20.4.5 Retinal Vessel Analyzer
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •20.5.1 Color Doppler Imaging
- •20.5.2 Heidelberg Retinal Flowmeter
- •20.5.3 Canon Laser Blood Flowmetry
- •20.5.4 Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •20.5.5 Retinal Vessel Analyzer
- •Summary for the Clinician:
- •20.6 How Can the Data from Ocular Hemodynamic Studies Be Used in Clinical Practice?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •21.1.1 The Visual Evoked Potential (VEP)
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •21.3 Is the mfVEP a Useful Test in Glaucoma?
- •21.3.1 The mfVEP Is Not Ready for Routine Screening of Glaucoma Patients
- •21.3.2 The mfVEP Can Provide Clinically Useful Information
- •21.3.2.2 Unreliable Visual Fields
- •21.3.2.3 Inconsistent Visual Fields
- •21.3.2.3 Visual Fields that Need Confirmation
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Risk Factors
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •22.2 What are the Main Risk Factors for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma?
- •22.2.2 Demographic Factors
- •22.2.4 Central Corneal Thickness
- •22.2.5 Systemic Factors
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Risk Factors: The Risk Calculator
- •23.1 Is a Risk Calculator Useful?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •23.2 How Should I Use a Risk Calculator?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •23.3 Can I Screen for Glaucoma with a Risk Calculator?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •23.4 What Does It Mean to Me and My Patient If the Risk Score Is High?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •24.1 Should Beta Blockers Still Be Used as a First-Line Agent?
- •24.1.1 What is the Topical Beta Blocker Mechanism of Action?
- •24.1.2 What Magnitude of IOP Decrease Is Seen with Beta Blockers?
- •24.1.3 How Should Beta Blockers Be Initiated?
- •24.1.4 What Are the Differences Between Individual Beta Blockers?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •24.4 Should Miotics Still Be Used?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •25.2 What Medications Are Safe to Use in a Nursing Mother?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •26.2 How Should Oral CAIs Be Dosed?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •26.4 Can CAIs Be Used in Pregnant Women or Pediatric Patients?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •26.5 Can CAIs Be Used in Patients with Sickle Cell Anemia?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Medical Treatment: Osmotic Agents
- •27.1 When Using Hyperosmotics Agents, What Is a Typical Dose for Acutely Elevated Intraocular Pressure (IOP)?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •27.3 Should Hyperosmotic Agents Be Used to Lower IOP Prior to Surgery?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Medical Treatment: Neuroprotection
- •28.1 What Exactly Is Neuroprotection?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •28.3.1 Memantine
- •28.3.2 Brimonidine
- •28.3.3 Betaxolol
- •28.3.4 Calcium Channel Blockers
- •23.3.5 Other Possible Treatments
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •29.2 What Is the Natural History of Treated and Untreated Glaucoma?
- •29.2.1 Olmsted County, MN
- •29.2.2 St. Lucia Study
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •30.1.1 What Is Adherence?
- •30.1.2 What Is Persistence?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •30.2 How Can One Help Patients to Be More Compliant with Treatment?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •31.2.1 Exercise
- •31.2.2 Smoking
- •31.2.3 Alcohol Consumption
- •31.2.4 Diet
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •31.3.1 Marijuana Use
- •31.3.2 Gingko Biloba
- •31.3.3 Bilberry
- •31.3.4 Acupunture
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •32.1.2 Does Trabeculoplasty benefit Compliance?
- •32.1.3 How well does Trabeculoplasty control the Diurnal IOP curve?
- •32.1.4 What are the Side Effects/Risks of Trabeculoplasty?
- •32.1.5 What are the Economic Issues Involved with Trabeculoplasty?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •32.2.1 What is the Efficacy of ALT Versus SLT?
- •32.2.2 What are the Complications of ALT Versus SLT?
- •32.2.3 How does Retreatment compare between ALT and SLT?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •32.3 When Should SLT or ALT not Be Performed?
- •32.3.1 Types of Glaucoma
- •32.3.2 IOP Reduction
- •32.3.3 Maximal Medical Therapy
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •32.4.1 Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty
- •32.4.2 Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •32.7 What is the Mechanism of Action of ALT and SLT?
- •32.7.1 Mechanical Theory
- •32.7.2 Biologic Theory
- •32.7.3 Repopulation Theory
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •33.1 When Can or Should Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) Be Used?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •33.2 Should ECP Be Used as a Primary Surgery for Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •33.3 Is Burning the Ciliary Processes a Safe Thing to Do?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •33.6 What Are Complications that May Be Encountered and How Are They Specifically Managed?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •33.8 What Is the Long Term Safety Data on this Procedure?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •34.1 What is Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation (TCP)?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •34.2 When Should I Use TCP? Should it be Used as a Primary Surgery for Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •34.3 Technically, How is TCP Performed?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Procedural Treatments: Trabeculectomy
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •35.2 Should Antimetabolites be Used in All Cases of Trabeculectomy?
- •35.3 Do You Adjust Antimetabolite Usage and Dose Based on Patient Age or Race?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Procedural Treatments: Bleb Needling
- •37.1.1 Slit Lamp Bleb Needling
- •37.1.3 Antimetabolite Use with Needling
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •37.2 Is It Ever Too Early or Too Late to Needle a Bleb?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •37.5 Is It Better to Needle or Reoperate on a Failing Bleb?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •38.1 Is One Tube Shunt Design Better than Another at Lowering IOP?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •39.1.1 Aqueous Shunts for Glaucoma (Supporting Evidence Level I/1c)
- •39.1.2 Cyclodestruction with Diode G-Probe (Supporting Evidence Level III/4)
- •39.1.3 Cyclodestruction with Diode Endocyclophotocoagulation (Supporting Evidence Level I/1c)
- •39.1.8 iScience (Canaloplasty) (Supporting Evidence III/4)
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •40.2 What Is the Ex-PRESS Mini-Shunt and How Does It Work?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •40.6 What Complications Are Specific to the Ex-PRESS Shunt Procedure?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •41.1.1 When to Add a Trabeculectomy to Cataract Surgery
- •41.1.2 When to Add Phacoemulsification to a Trabeculectomy
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •41.2.1 Glaucoma as the Primary Problem
- •41.2.2 Cataract as the Primary Problem
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •41.3 How Is the Postoperative Course of a Phacotrabeculectomy Different than that After the Individual Surgeries?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •42.1 What Is End-Stage Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •42.2 Should I Operate on a Patient with End-Stage Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •42.4 How Do Specific Complications of Surgery in End-Stage Glaucoma Lead to Vision Loss?
- •42.4.1 Hypotony Maculopathy
- •42.4.2 Retinal Detachment
- •42.4.3 Endophthalmitis
- •42.4.4 Malignant Glaucoma and others
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •42.5 What Can Be Done to Minimize Potential Vision Loss Due to Surgery in End-Stage Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •43.3 What Is the Treatment of Choice in Normal-Tension Glaucoma – Medication, Laser, or Surgery?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •43.4.1 Risk Factors for Progression in NTG
- •43.4.2 Disc Hemorrhage in NTG
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Glaucomas: Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma
- •44.1 Is There a Gene for Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •44.3 What Is the Risk of Developing Glaucoma Once PXF Material Is Observed in the Eye?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •44.4.2 Cataract Extraction Technique
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •45.2 Is PDG Managed Differently than Primary Open Angle Glaucoma?
- •45.2.1 Medical Treatment
- •45.2.2 Trabeculoplasty
- •45.2.3 Trabeculectomy
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •45.6.1 Medical Therapy
- •45.6.2 Laser and Incisional Surgery
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Glaucomas: Sturge Weber Syndrome
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Glaucomas: Glaucoma and the Cornea
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •47.3 What Effect Does Laser Glaucoma Surgery Have on the Cornea?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Glaucomas: Uveitic Glaucoma
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •48.2 Is There a Way to Distinguish Between Elevated IOP Due to a Steroid Response vs. Uveitis?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •48.3 How Do Inflammation and Steroids Cause an Increase in IOP?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •48.5 Is There a Preferred Surgery for Uveitic Glaucoma (Trabeculectomy vs. Tube vs. Laser)?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •48.6 Is One Tube Preferred over Another in Uveitic Glaucoma?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Glaucomas: Neovascular Glaucoma
- •49.1.1 IOP Lowering Agents
- •49.1.3 Cycloplegics/Mydriatics
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •50.1 What Is the Best Way to Measure IOP in the Pediatric Patient?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •51.1.1 Which Medications Can Be Used as First Line Agents in Children?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •52.1 How Do I Perform Goniosurgery?
- •52.1.2 What Can I Do Technically to Perform a Better Trabeculotomy ?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •53.2 Is Trabeculectomy Preferred over Tube Shunt Surgery in Children?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •53.4 What Factors Help One Decide for or Against One Surgery over the Other?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •53.5.1 In Trabeculectomy
- •53.5.2 In Tube-Shunts
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •53.7 What Can Be Done Technically to Perform a Better Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery in Kids?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Angle-Closure Glaucoma: Risk Factors
- •54.1 Who Is at Risk for Acute Angle-Closure?
- •54.1.1 What are the Anatomical Risk Factors?
- •54.1.2 Age, Gender and Ethnicity
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Angle-Closure Glaucoma: Iridotomy
- •55.1.1 Settings for Argon LPI
- •55.1.2 Settings for Nd-YAG LPI
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •55.3 If It Is Difficult to Penetrate the Iris, What Adjustments Can Be Made to the Laser Settings?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •55.4.1 Visual Discomfort
- •55.4.2 Diplopia and/or Glare
- •55.4.3 Hemorrhage
- •55.4.4 Corneal Damage
- •55.4.5 Lens Damage
- •55.4.6 IOP Elevation
- •55.4.7 Progression of PAS Formation
- •55.4.8 Posterior Synechia
- •55.4.9 LPI Closure
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Angle-Closure Glaucoma: Imaging
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •56.2.1 Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM)
- •56.2.3 Scheimpflug Photography
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •56.3 When Should UBM and AS-OCT Be Ordered: Is One Device Considered Better than the Other?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •56.4.1 Qualitative Analysis
- •56.4.2 Quantitative Analysis
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Angle-Closure Glaucoma: Medical Therapy
- •57.1.1 Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
- •57.1.2 Beta-Blockers
- •57.1.3 Alpha-Agonists
- •57.1.4 Prostaglandin Analogs
- •57.1.5 Hyperosmotic Agents
- •57.1. 6 Miotics
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Complications: Hypotony
- •59.1 What are the Options in the Treatment of Early Postoperative Hypotony?
- •59.1.1 Compression Sutures
- •59.1.2 Anterior Chamber Reformation
- •59.1.3 Choroidal Drainage
- •59.1.4 Repairing Wound Leaks
- •59.1.5 Resuturing of Trabeculectomy Flap
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •59.2 If There Is Hypotony Maculopathy, What Should Be Done to Manage It?
- •59.2.1 Cataract Surgery and Hypotony
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •59.3 How Can I Manage Late Hypotony Due to a Scleral Melt?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Complications: Bleb Leaks
- •60.1.2 With a Large/Brisk, Early Postoperative Bleb Leak, What Options Are Available to Help It Heal?
- •60.1.3 What Can I Do If the Leak Continues to Persist?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •60.2.2 Autologous Blood Injection
- •60.2.3 Compression Sutures
- •60.2.4 Laser
- •60.2.5 Surgical Bleb Revision
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Complications: Blebitis
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •61.3 How Do I Manage a Patient After the Blebitis Is Resolved?
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Subject Index
226 |
M. Y. Kahook and M. R. Wilson |
|
|
glaucomas. Except in very limited circumstances, it would be unethical to design a prospective study of untreated glaucomatous eyes. The Collaborative Normal Tension Glaucoma Study (CNTGS) and the Early Manifest Glaucoma Treatment Trial (EMGT) are both clinical trials that included an untreated cohort [4–6]. Although clinical trials are not optimal for studying the natural history of a chronic disease, information derived from EMGT and CNTGS supplement the information derived from the observational studies noted above (Olmsted County and St. Lucia) to provide a better understanding of the natural history of treated and untreated OAG.
The situation with ocular hypertension differs from that of OAG in that it is not considered a disease, but rather a risk factor for the disease. Additionally, because numerous studies to assess the benefit of treating ocular hypertension had yielded inclusive results, there existed no ethical barriers to designing a long-term clin ical trial of untreated vs. treated patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). With the completion of the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) and the European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS), the natural history of untreated vs. treated ocular hypertension is now well established [7–9].
We will summarize the design and findings of these studies and explain how each contributes to our knowledge of the natural history of OAG and of ocular hypertension.
29.2 What Is the Natural History of Treated and Untreated Glaucoma?
29.2.1 Olmsted County, MN
In a retrospective community based incidence study, the Rochester Epidemiology Project database was used to access information on the 60,666 residents of Olmsted County, MN [1]. During the 16-year study interval, 114 patients were newly diagnosed with OAG. Eighty-nine percent (102/114) of patients with OAG had POAG. Annual incidence was noted to increase with age, ranging from 1.6/100,000 in the fourth decade of life to 94.3/100,000 in the eighth decade. While incidence rates peaked during the eighth decade, there was a notable decrease in incidence rates in the ninth and tenth decade of life. This downturn was attributed to either
the small number of patients in this age group or alternatively to the tendency of physicians not to treat existing POAG in these upper decades of life.
The overall gender and age-adjusted annual incidence rate was about 14.5 per 100,000, and gender was not noted to have a significant effect on incidence. Also of interest was the change in annual incidence rate of OAG in the last 2 years of the study (27.2 per 100,000) compared to earlier in the study (12.3 per 100,000). The authors suggested that this difference was due to the introduction of timolol in October of 1978. The existence of a relatively well tolerated and effective therapy may have made physicians more likely to diagnose OAG. Alternatively, the presence of a new therapy may have exposed physicians to new education about OAG and made them more likely to diagnose the disease.
In a 1998 report examining the Olmsted County retrospective data set, the probability of unilateral blindness was reported to be 27% and bilateral blindness was 9% after 20 years in the 295 patients classified as having classic glaucoma and ocular hypertension [10]. Blindness was defined as visual field constriction to within 20° of fixation or visual acuity of 20/200 or worse. In the “classic” glaucoma sub-group analysis, there was a 22% probability of bilateral blindness and 54% probability of unilateral blindness at 20 years. (Classic glaucoma was defined as meeting two of three of the following: IOP ³21 mmHg, optic nerve damage, and/or visual field defects. Of note, 89% of patients had IOP ³ 21 mmHg.) In the treated ocular hypertension group, cumulative probability for bilateral and unilateral blindness was 4 and 14%, respectively. It must be noted that during most of the time of this retrospective review, timolol and laser trabeculoplasty were not available treatment options.
The Olmsted County retrospective review clearly documented that the incidence of glaucoma increased with advancing age. The study is limited by its retrospective design, which did not allow for standardized treatments and data collection. Also, attempting to use data from this study to better understand the natural history of treated POAG today is limited due to the use of an entirely different group of medications. Beta blockers were not available for most of the study period, and selective alpha-agonists and prostaglandin analogs were years away from the marketplace. It could be argued that in comparison to currently available medications, these patients were sub-optimally
29 Medical Treatment: Treated vs. Untreated Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension |
227 |
|
|
treated and may be more aptly classified as not treated. Another limitation of the data is that the population was almost exclusively Caucasian (98%) with considerable Scandinavian ancestry. The information obtained, while instructive, cannot probably be generalized to other racial/ethnic groups.
(30%), the percentage of black AGIS subjects with visual field progression at 10 years would be approximately 43% (assuming that the percentage increases linearly). In the St. Lucia follow-up study, a considerably larger percentage of untreated eyes progressed – 53%. Keep in mind that the AGIS and St. Lucia patients may not be equal in terms of baseline visual field loss.
29.2.2 St. Lucia Study
The initial St. Lucia Eye Study was conducted in 1986/1987 and documented the prevalence of POAG on the Caribbean island country [2]. This population-based survey included 1,679 subjects; 364 glaucoma subjects and glaucoma suspects were identified. Ten years later, a repeat examination was executed of the cohort of glaucoma subjects and glaucoma suspects who were still living and residing in St. Lucia, who had not undergone glaucoma surgery, and who were not being medically treated (n = 205) [3].
Humphrey 30-2 threshold visual fields were obtained at both the initial 1987 survey and the 1997 follow-up examination. Both sets of visual fields were converted to a format suitable for grading by criteria established and used by the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) and the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Studies comparing these two grading algorithms have found the AGIS algorithm to yield more conservative results than the CIGTS algorithm.
Using the AGIS criteria, 80 of 146 right eyes and 73 of 141 left eyes had progressed. Of the eyes that had progressed, 24 of the 80 right eyes (30%) and 21 of the 73 left eyes (29%) had progressed to end-stage glaucoma. Overall, the probability of reaching an “end-stage” visual field endpoint in at least one eye was 16% at 10 years.
The study population was exclusively black, and thus, generalizations from this study are limited. The best comparison of visual field progression in treated vs. untreated glaucomatous eyes is made by comparing the results of this study with a study that used the same definition of progression. Although the comparison is not ideal, the AGIS had subjects with varying levels of glaucoma severity, all the subjects were treated, the same visual field scoring algorithm was used, and the data allows comparison with black subjects only. Extrapolating from the percentage of black subjects with visual field loss progression at 7 years in AGIS
29.2.3 Collaborative Normal Tension
Glaucoma Study
The CNTGS was designed to measure the efficacy of a 30% IOP reduction on the rate of glaucoma progression in patients with pressures considered to be in the normal range (i.e., low or normal tension glaucoma) [4]. Eligible eyes had to manifest glaucomatous optic nerve excavation and a field defect consisting of a cluster of three non-edge points depressed by 5 dB, with one of the points also depressed by 10 dB (two of three baseline tests over 4 weeks had to agree). Progression was suspected if: (1) at least two contiguous points within or adjacent to a baseline defect showed a reduction in sensitivity from baseline of ³10 dB or if the reduction noted was three times the average baseline short-term fluctuation for that subject, (2) the sensitivity of each suspected point was outside the range of values observed during baseline testing, or (3) a defect occurred in a previously normal part of the field. Classification of a patient as “progressing” required agreement on four tests.
One hundred and forty eyes of 140 patients were used in this study (61 treatment and 79 control). Twentyeight (35%) of the control eyes and seven (12%) of the treated eyes reached either visual field or optic nerve end-points for progression. The mean time to progression was 2,688 ± 123 and 1,695 ± 143 days for the treated and control groups respectively (p < 0.0001). The authors concluded that IOP is part of the pathogenic process in normal-tension glaucoma. A follow-up report in 2001 focused specifically on 160 CNTGS patients who were untreated among a total enrollment of 260 [11]. Of these 160 patients, 49 were randomly assigned on enrollment to not receive therapy, 24 were followed without treatment until later being randomly assigned to treatment (due to progression by visual field testing or optic nerve examination), 31 were followed without treatment and were later randomly assigned to be followed for additional time without treatment, and
