Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Orbital Disease Present Status and Future Challenges_Rootmann_2005.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
5.82 Mб
Скачать

Orbital Inflammatory Disease: Classification and New Insights

9

infiltrate the tissues, particularly early in the disease, and induce the changes related to the disorder. This is brought about by cytokine release, oxygen-free radicals, and fibrogenic growth-factors leading to fibroblast stimulation and causing glycosaminoglycan deposition, cell growth, and preadipocyte transformation (6,7).

CHANGING PARADIGMS IN THE TREATMENT

OF INFLAMMATION: THE RHEUMATOLOGIC

APPROACH

Our experience in working with rheumatologists has made us aware of the changing approach to the management of rheumatologic disorders (as presented by Shojania in this symposium). Traditionally, diseases in this specialty have been treated in a pyramidal fashion, beginning with nonspecific anti-inflammatories, such as salicylates and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), moving up the ladder to disease-modifying treatments, such as antimalaria drugs, gold, methotrexate, and sulfadiazine, and more recently to drugs that target specific cytokines. The general shift, as noted in this symposium, has been to invert the pyramid and use more specific or aggressive therapy early in the course of the disease.

DIRECTED TREATMENTS OF DISTINCT ORBITAL INFLAMMATIONS

The recent trend in the management of rheumatologic disorders has prompted our unit to use their approach in managing certain orbital inflammations, thereby introducing more specific treatment for several disorders. This has led to improved results in the management of some complex inflammations. For instance since 1994, we have been treating newly diagnosed sclerosing inflammation with a combination of cytolytic doses of corticosteroids (intravenous methylprednisolone), T-cell inhibitors such as cyclosporine or methotrexate, and in some instances other immunosuppressive drugs.

10

Rootman

This has led to significant improvement in some advanced cases and no recurrences or progression so far in eight patients treated following a biopsy-proven primary diagnosis of sclerosing inflammation of the orbit. Recently, in the instance of AAPOX, we have applied the same principle to attack the cytotoxic T-cells and have had several successes.

A recent case of a patient with AAPOX summarizes the role of immune mediation in establishing and promoting the disorder. This 46-year-old man presented with bilateral orbital involvement of AAPOX, which was associated with significant infiltration of the subcutaneous tissues of his cheek. He had an antecedent lymphoproliferative disorder and adultonset asthma, signifying an immunoregulatory problem as the basis for his manifestations. The AAPOX heretofore had been unresponsive to corticosteroids alone. He was placed on cyclosporine, pulsed steroids, and immunosuppressives, which led to significant improvement of his periorbital and subcutaneous facial disease. Recently, he developed Burkitt’s lymphoma that was treated with aggressive chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation, leading to further improvement of his orbital disease almost to the point of disappearance. Approximately 10 weeks after his bone marrow transplant, he developed an acute orbital infiltrate as his body repopulated with its own lymphocytes, which underlines the role of these cells and their cytokines in this specific inflammatory disease.

We have also encountered two different instances of myositis that were treated on the basis of the cellular infiltrate. One patient, previously unresponsive to corticosteroids, was found on biopsy to have a dominance of T-cells and responded well to methotrexate and cyclosporine. The second patient had a dominance of CD20 cells and responded to Rituximab, a specific chimeric drug directed against CD20 cells.

In review of the literature and from our own experience, T-cells and their mediators are now implicated in fibrotic responses in asthma, systemic sclerosis, sarcoidosis, murine viral myocarditis, thyroid orbitopathy, wound healing, lung

Orbital Inflammatory Disease: Classification and New Insights

11

Figure 3 This diagram illustrates the inflammatory pathway and intermediaries that lead to fibroblast proliferation in collagen synthesis, emphasizing the multiple sites at which the process could be altered.

fibrosis, liver fibrosis, sclerosing inflammation, and retroperitoneal fibrosis, as well as AAPOX and Erdheim–Chester disease, which is reported in this symposium (8–21). In addition, fibroblasts isolated from conditions of pathologic fibrosis often display a persistently abnormal phenotype, which is apparently independent of exposure to initiating pathologic stimulus (22). This leads to the possibility of treating desmoplastic inflammatory diseases at many different points in their pathogenetic pathway (Fig. 3). This paradigm will define the future of management of inflammatory disease. In fact, the shift in our knowledge of inflammatory disease from nonspecific to specific is now allowing us to identify cytologic and molecular targets that will alter the fundamental approach to inflammatory disorders. Moreover, it emphasizes a need to define inflammatory disorders with greater specificity and accuracy.

12

Rootman

REFERENCES

1.Rootman J. Diseases of the Orbit: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Lippincott, Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

2.Rootman J, McCarthy J, White V, Harris G, Kennerdell J. Idiopathic sclerosing inflammation of the orbit: a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Ophthalmology 1994; 101(3):570–584.

3.Perry SR, Rootman J, White VA. The clinical and pathologic constellation of Wegener’s granulomatosis of the orbit. Ophthalmology 1997; 104(4):683–694.

4.Selva D, Dolman PJ, Rootman J. Orbital granulomatous giant cell myositis: case report and review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 28(1):65–68.

5.McCarthy JM, White VA, Harris G, Simons KB, Kennerdell J, Rootman J. Idiopathic sclerosing inflammation of the orbit: immunohistologic analysis and comparison with retroperitoneal fibrosis. Mod Pathol 1993; 6(5):581–587.

6.Kazim M, Goldberg RA, Smith TJ. Insights into the pathogenesis of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: evolving rationale for therapy. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120(3):380–386.

7.Pappa A, Lawson JMM, Calder V, Fells P, Lightman S. T cells and fibroblasts in affected extraocular muscles in early and late thyroid associated ophthalmopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84(5):517–522.

8.Postlethwaite AE. Role of T cells and cytokines in effecting fibrosis. Int Rev Immunol 1995; 12(2–4):247–258.

9.Jimenez SA, Saitta B. Alterations in the regulation of expression of the alpha-1(I) collagen gene (COL1A1) in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4):397–414.

10.Le Bousse-Kerdiles MC, Martyre MC. Myelofibrosis: pathogenesis of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. French INSERM Research Network on Myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4): 491–508.

11.Pinzani M. Liver fibrosis. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4):475–490.

Orbital Inflammatory Disease: Classification and New Insights

13

12.Eckes B, Kessler D, Aumailley M, Krieg T. Interactions of fibroblasts with the extracellular matrix: implications for the understanding of fibrosis. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4):415–429.

13.Fonseca C, Abraham D, Black CM. Lung fibrosis. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4):453–474.

14.Chizzolini C. T lymphocyte and fibroblast interactions: the case of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis and other examples. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4):431–450.

15.Chizzolini C. Introductory note to: fibrosis year 2000. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4):377–382.

16.Wahl SM, Allen JB. T lymphocyte-dependent mechanisms of fibrosis. Prog Clin Biol Res 1988; 266:147–160.

17.Bellinghausen I, Brand U, Steinbrink K, Enk AH, Knop J, Saloga J. Inhibition of human allergic T-cell responses by IL- 10-treated dendritic cells: differences from hydrocortisonetreated dendritic cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 108(2):242–249.

18.Holgate ST, Djukanovic R, Howarth PH, Montefort S, Roche W. The T cell and the airway’s fibrotic response in asthma. Chest 1993; 103(3):125S–128S.

19.Parkin J, Cohen B. An overview of the immune system. Lancet 2001; 357(9270):1777–1789.

20.Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 1998; 392(6673):245–252.

21.Cordeiro MF, Schultz GS, Ali RR, Bhattacharya SS, Khaw PT. Molecular therapy in ocular wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83(11):1219–1224.

22.Jelaska A, Strehlow D, Korn JH. Fibroblast hererogeniety in physiological conditions and fibrotic disease. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000; 21(4):385–395.