Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
11.93 Mб
Скачать

34 Neurofibromatosis: Tumors of the Optic Pathway

429

pathway, their growth leads to obstructive hydrocephalus, which can lead to visual involvement related to complications of hydrocephalus. These tumors can also lead to paralytic strabismus that, if not monitored, can lead to strabismic amblyopia.

34.6.2 Evaluation and Management

Assessment of tumors of the brain parenchyma includes an MRI of the brain, MR spectroscopy of specific lesions, neurological assessment, and neuroophthalmological assessment. MRI characteristics of juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas and higher-grade tumors include high signal intensity of the mass lesion on T1 postcontrast scans and high signal intensity in T2-flair sequences. MR spectroscopy may be helpful in delineating tumor grade through specific patterns of the creatine/choline and N-acetyl aspartate peaks derived from scanning the tumor and its margins. NF1 patients also show specific patterns of benign imaging “abnormalities” on MRI that are known as T2 hyperintensities. These findings include regions of T2 and T2-flair hyperintensities that occur in the optic pathway, mesial temporal lobe, basal ganglia, and deep white matter of the cerebellum among the years [2628]. These findings occur in approximately 60% of children with NF1 and usually become less apparent with age. These findings are generally benign, stereotypically occur in the aforementioned locations, and must not be misinterpreted as indicating tumors of the central nervous system. Occasionally, children with NF1 can develop aqueductal stenosis without an obvious tumor, causing obstructive hydrocephalus.

Evaluation and management of parenchymal optic pathway tumors follow the same general principles outlined above for tumors of the optic chiasm. The primary differences arise in the treatment of tumors of higher grade; there is great variability in the response of such tumors to treatment, and an array of different chemotherapy protocols may be used after primary treatment modalities fail. These evaluation and management decisions are defined in “road map” plans per experimental protocol but usually follow very individual courses that are tailored as the clinical picture evolves with each patient. Further discussion of these protocols is beyond the scope of this chapter.

34.7 Conclusion

NF1 causes a genetic predisposition to tumor-related conditions that affect the visual pathways. Four major tumor types were presented in this review: periorbital and orbital plexiform neurofibroma, intraorbital optic nerve glioma, chiasmal and hypothalamic glioma, and intraparenchymal astrocytomas of the post-optic-tract region of the brain. The variety of these tumors reflects the potential impact of the NF1 gene on many primitive tissues in fetal development. Ophthalmic examination and follow-up are important to determine the optimal timing and type of interventions.

430

J.M. Slopis and J.S. Schiffman

References

1.Mulvihill JJ, Parry DM, Sherman JL, Pikus A, Kaiser-Kupfer MI, Eldridge R. NIH conference. Neurofibromatosis 1 (Recklinghausen disease) and neurofibromatosis 2 (bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis). An update. Ann Intern Med 1990;113(1):39–52.

2.Wallace MR, Marchuk DA, Andersen LB, Letcher R, Odeh HM, Saulino AM, Fountain JW, Brereton A, Nicholson J, Mitchell AL, et al. Type 1 neurofibromatosis gene: identification of a large transcript disrupted in three NF1 patients. Science 1990;249(4965):181–6.

3.Viskochil D, Buchberg AM, Xu G, Cawthon RM, Stevens J, Wolff RK, Culver M, Carey JC, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, et al. Deletions and a translocation interrupt a cloned gene at the neurofibromatosis type 1 locus. Cell 1990;62(1):187–92.

4.von Deimling A, Krone W, Menon AG. Neurofibromatosis type 1: pathology, clinical features and molecular genetics. Brain Pathol 1995;5(2):153–62.

5.Neurofibromatosis. Conference statement. In: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference, Vol. 45, 1988/05/01 edn. Arch Neurol 1988:575–8.

6.Gutmann DH, Aylsworth A, Carey JC, Korf B, Marks J, Pyeritz RE, Rubenstein A, Viskochil D. The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA 1997;278(1):51–7.

7.Listernick R, Louis DN, Packer RJ, Gutmann DH. Optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis 1: consensus statement from the NF1 Optic Pathway Glioma Task Force. Ann Neurol 1997;41(2):143–9.

8.Friedman JM. Neurofibromatosis 1: clinical manifestations and diagnostic criteria. J Child Neurol 2002 Aug;17(8):548–54; discussion 571–2, 646–51.

9.Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet 2002;39(5):311–4.

10.Thomas C, Somani N, Owen LG, Malone JC, Billings SD. Cutaneous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. J Cutan Pathol 2009;36(8):896–900.

11.Chang BC, Mirabella G, Yagev R, Banh M, Mezer E, Parkin PC, Westall CA, Buncic JR. Screening and diagnosis of optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 by using sweep visual evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(6): 2895–902.

12.Montgomery AB, Griffin T, Parker RG, Gerdes AJ. Optic nerve glioma: the role of radiation therapy. Cancer 1977;40(5):2079–80.

13.Parker JC, Jr., Smith JL, Reyes P, Vuksanovic MM. Chiasmal optic glioma after radiation therapy. Neuro-ophthalmologic/pathologic correlation. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 1981;1(1):31–43.

14.Glaser JS, Hoyt WF, Corbett J. Visual morbidity with chiasmal glioma. Long-term studies of visual fields in untreated and irradiated cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1971;85(1):3–12.

15.Ullrich NJ, Robertson R, Kinnamon DD, Scott RM, Kieran MW, Turner CD, Chi SN, Goumnerova L, Proctor M, Tarbell NJ, et al. Moyamoya following cranial irradiation for primary brain tumors in children. Neurology 2007;68(12):932–8.

16.Aoki S, Barkovich AJ, Nishimura K, Kjos BO, Machida T, Cogen P, Edwards M, Norman D. Neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2: cranial MR findings. Radiology 1989;172(2):527–34.

17.Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Klein MJ, Slopis JK. Growth hormone deficiency in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 without suprasellar lesions. Pediatr Neurol 2000;22(5):355–8.

18.Billingsley RL, Lang FF, Slopis JM, Schrimsher GW, Ater JL, Moore BD, 3rd. Visualspatial neglect in a child following sub-cortical tumor resection. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002;44(3):191–9.

19.Mazzocco MMM, Turner JE, Bridge Denckla M, Hofman KJ, Scanlon DC, Vellutino FR. Language and reading deficits associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: evidence for a not- so-nonverbal learning disability. Dev Neuropsychol 1995;11(4):503–22.

20.Coude FX, Mignot C, Lyonnet S, Munnich A. Academic impairment is the most frequent complication of neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1) in children. Behav Genet 2006;36(5): 660–4.

34 Neurofibromatosis: Tumors of the Optic Pathway

431

21.Balestri P, Vivarelli R, Grosso S, Santori L, Farnetani MA, Galluzzi P, Vatti GP, Calabrese F, Morgese G. Malformations of cortical development in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology 2003;61(12):1799–801.

22.Billingsley RL, Schrimsher GW, Jackson EF, Slopis JM, Moore BD, 3rd. Significance of planum temporale and planum parietale morphologic features in neurofibromatosis type 1. Arch Neurol 2002;59(4):616–22.

23.Itoh T, Magnaldi S, White RM, Denckla MB, Hofman K, Naidu S, Bryan RN. Neurofibromatosis type 1: the evolution of deep gray and white matter MR abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15(8):1513–9.

24.Kayl AE, Moore BD, 3rd, Slopis JM, Jackson EF, Leeds NE. Quantitative morphology of the corpus callosum in children with neurofibromatosis and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Neurol 2000;15(2):90–6.

25.Schrimsher GW, Billingsley RL, Slopis JM, Moore BD, 3rd. Visual-spatial performance deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type-1. Am J Med Genet A 2003;120A(3):326–30.

26.DiPaolo DP, Zimmerman RA, Rorke LB, Zackai EH, Bilaniuk LT, Yachnis AT. Neurofibromatosis type 1: pathologic substrate of high-signal-intensity foci in the brain. Radiology 1995;195(3):721–4.

27.Duffner PK, Cohen ME, Seidel FG, Shucard DW. The significance of MRI abnormalities in children with neurofibromatosis. Neurology 1989;39(3):373–8.

28.Sevick RJ, Barkovich AJ, Edwards MS, Koch T, Berg B, Lempert T. Evolution of white matter lesions in neurofibromatosis type 1: MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159(1):171–5.