- •Dedication
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Ocular Allergy Overview
- •The ocular surface
- •Clinical examination
- •Immunopathophysiology of ocular allergy
- •Acute allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
- •Atopic keratoconjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Contact dermatitis of the eyelids
- •Blepharoconjunctivitis
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis
- •Vasomotor conjunctivitis
- •Ocular examination
- •Ophthalmic procedures and testing
- •Summary
- •References
- •Ocular Mast Cells and Mediators
- •Mast cell mediators
- •Preformed granule-associated mediators
- •Biogenic amines
- •Proteoglycans
- •Neutral proteases
- •Newly generated mediators
- •Lipid mediators
- •Cytokines
- •Mast cell heterogeneity
- •Phenotypic heterogeneity
- •Functional heterogeneity
- •Pharmacologic heterogeneity
- •Ocular mast cells
- •The normal eye
- •Mast cells in diseases of the eye
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal conjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Experimental autoimmune uveitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Allergic Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Examination
- •Seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
- •Perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Procedures
- •Late-phase reaction
- •Treatment
- •Antihistamines
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Lodoxamide tromethamine 0.1% (Alomide)
- •Ketorolac tromethamine (Acular)
- •Olopatadine (Patanol, Pataday)
- •Ketotifen (Zaditor)
- •Nedocromil (Alocril)
- •Pemirolast (Alamast)
- •Azelastine (Optivar)
- •Epinastine (Elestat)
- •Corticosteroids (Vexol, Lotemax)
- •Summary
- •References
- •Vernal Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical manifestation
- •Conjunctival signs
- •Limbal signs
- •Corneal signs
- •Pathogenesis
- •Laboratory evaluation
- •Allergy testing
- •Conjunctival examination
- •Tear evaluation
- •Ocular challenge test
- •Treatment
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Antihistamines
- •Corticosteroids
- •Immunosuppressive agents
- •Other medical therapies
- •Surgical therapy
- •Treatment of secondary infections
- •Hyposensitization and immunotherapy
- •Prognosis
- •References
- •Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis
- •Signs and symptoms
- •Stages of giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Epidemiology
- •Histopathology
- •Coated contact lenses
- •Pathophysiology
- •Treatment
- •Treatment for stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Recognizing marginal dry eye disease
- •Contact lens wear in patients with dry eye
- •The use of therapeutic contact lenses in dry eye
- •The use of contact lenses in a patient with ocular allergy
- •Contact lenses and allergic reactions
- •Managing contact lens wear in the patient with ocular allergy
- •Summary of contact lens use in patient with ocular allergy
- •References
- •Mucous membrane pemphigoid
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Linear immunoglobulin A disease
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Ocular pemphigus vulgaris
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Summary
- •References
- •Seborrheic dermatitis
- •Treatment
- •Vitiligo
- •Heliotrope rash
- •Port-wine stains
- •Xanthelasmas and plane xanthomas
- •Seborrheic keratosis
- •Skin tags
- •Warts
- •Comedones
- •Syringoma
- •Rosacea
- •Lipoid proteinosis
- •Angioedema
- •Contact urticaria
- •Erysipelas
- •Trichinosis
- •Chalazion
- •Hordeolum
- •Nevi
- •Sarcoid
- •Hemangioma
- •Basal cell carcinoma
- •Squamous cell carcinoma
- •Sebaceous carcinoma
- •Malignant melanoma
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Atopic dermatitis
- •Contact dermatitis
- •Acute, subacute, and chronic
- •Epidemiology
- •Irritant versus allergic
- •Etiologies
- •Irritation due to mascara and eye cosmetic preservatives
- •Fragrance
- •Irritation due to conjunctival deposition
- •Nail polish
- •Metals
- •Aeroallergens
- •Medications/eyedrops/contact lens solution
- •Paper
- •Plants
- •Histology
- •Diagnosis
- •Herpes simplex
- •Herpes zoster
- •Treatment considerations for the eyelids
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Infections
- •Urticaria and angiodema
- •Benign tumors and growths
- •Malignant tumors
- •‘‘Cosmetic’’ lesions of the eyelids
- •Vascular lesions
- •Vitiligo
- •Others
- •References
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis/herpes simplex virus infections
- •Treatment of infectious conjunctivitis
- •Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Neonatal conjunctivitis
- •Congenital glaucoma
- •Uveitis
- •References
- •Ocular Allergy Treatment
- •Ocular allergy treatment algorithm
- •Advisory nonprescription interventions
- •Environmental control
- •Cold compresses
- •Lubrication
- •Contact lenses
- •Decongestants
- •Antihistamines
- •Oral antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Levocabastine
- •Emedastine
- •Cromoglycate
- •Lodoxamide
- •Pemirolast
- •Ketorolac
- •Multiple action agents
- •Olopatadine
- •Ketotifen
- •Nedocromil
- •Azelastine
- •Epinastine
- •Mizolastine
- •Picumast
- •Amlexanox
- •Topical antihistamines and dry eye
- •Steroids
- •Ophthalmic steroids
- •Intranasal steroids
- •Immunomodulatory agents
- •Cyclosporine
- •Immunotherapy
- •Summary
- •References
212 |
BIELORY |
intranasal steroids may be a class e ect on ocular allergy, because triamcinolone [199], beclomethasone [200], budesonide [201], fluticasone propionate [195], fluticasone furoate [202] and mometasone furoate have shown this activity [203].
Immunomodulatory agents
Cyclosporine
Although cyclosporine (CsA) has been available for more than 20 years in various areas of organ transplantation, its lipophilicity presented a unique challenge for generating a solution or suspension to be delivered to ocular surface [204]. In an animal model, CsA 0.1% and 0.5% eye drops significantly inhibited eosinophilic infiltration into the conjunctiva in mice actively immunized with ragweed compared with vehicle-treated mice, and the inhibition was similar to that induced with 0.1% betamethasone [205]. Patients who had severe VKC treated with topical 2% cyclosporine A in preservative-free artificial tears showed improved signs and symptoms, and experienced no side e ects during the 14-week study [206]. In a lower dose regimen, 0.05% cyclosporine A for steroid-dependent AKC and VKC showed no benefit over placebo as a steroid-sparing agent [207]. Compared with a 0.5% solution of ketorolac, CsA 0.5% had a slower onset of improvement over 2 to 4 weeks, with a significant di erence in subjective (P!.005) and objective (P!.001) scores seen between the eyes treated with CsA or placebo at 2 weeks. At 4 weeks, scores for signs (P!.001) and symptoms (P ¼ .01) were reduced in the placebo-treated eyes, with no further improvement in the CsA-treated eyes [208].
Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy was used for the primary treatment of allergies, or spring ‘‘catarrh,’’ before antihistamines and other pharmacologic agents were discovered. In the original report, allergen immunotherapy ‘‘measured the patient’s resistance during experiments of pollen extracts to excite a conjunctival reaction’’ [209]. The eye, and not the skin, was the target organ.
The e cacy of allergen immunotherapy is well established, although allergic rhinitis seems to respond better to treatment compared with allergic conjunctivitis. In patients who experienced allergic asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis when exposed to specific animal dander (Fel d I allergen), one study showed that immunotherapy improved overall symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis, decreased antiallergy medications, and required a 1-log (10-fold) increase in the dose of allergen to induce a positive ocular challenge test reaction after 1 year of immunotherapy with the cat allergen [210]. This finding was also noted in an immunotherapy study over 12 months with a purified and standardized preparation of Dermatophagoides farinae, in which patients receiving immunotherapy injections experienced
