- •Dedication
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Ocular Allergy Overview
- •The ocular surface
- •Clinical examination
- •Immunopathophysiology of ocular allergy
- •Acute allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
- •Atopic keratoconjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Contact dermatitis of the eyelids
- •Blepharoconjunctivitis
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis
- •Vasomotor conjunctivitis
- •Ocular examination
- •Ophthalmic procedures and testing
- •Summary
- •References
- •Ocular Mast Cells and Mediators
- •Mast cell mediators
- •Preformed granule-associated mediators
- •Biogenic amines
- •Proteoglycans
- •Neutral proteases
- •Newly generated mediators
- •Lipid mediators
- •Cytokines
- •Mast cell heterogeneity
- •Phenotypic heterogeneity
- •Functional heterogeneity
- •Pharmacologic heterogeneity
- •Ocular mast cells
- •The normal eye
- •Mast cells in diseases of the eye
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal conjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Experimental autoimmune uveitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Allergic Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Examination
- •Seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
- •Perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Procedures
- •Late-phase reaction
- •Treatment
- •Antihistamines
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Lodoxamide tromethamine 0.1% (Alomide)
- •Ketorolac tromethamine (Acular)
- •Olopatadine (Patanol, Pataday)
- •Ketotifen (Zaditor)
- •Nedocromil (Alocril)
- •Pemirolast (Alamast)
- •Azelastine (Optivar)
- •Epinastine (Elestat)
- •Corticosteroids (Vexol, Lotemax)
- •Summary
- •References
- •Vernal Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical manifestation
- •Conjunctival signs
- •Limbal signs
- •Corneal signs
- •Pathogenesis
- •Laboratory evaluation
- •Allergy testing
- •Conjunctival examination
- •Tear evaluation
- •Ocular challenge test
- •Treatment
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Antihistamines
- •Corticosteroids
- •Immunosuppressive agents
- •Other medical therapies
- •Surgical therapy
- •Treatment of secondary infections
- •Hyposensitization and immunotherapy
- •Prognosis
- •References
- •Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis
- •Signs and symptoms
- •Stages of giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Epidemiology
- •Histopathology
- •Coated contact lenses
- •Pathophysiology
- •Treatment
- •Treatment for stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Recognizing marginal dry eye disease
- •Contact lens wear in patients with dry eye
- •The use of therapeutic contact lenses in dry eye
- •The use of contact lenses in a patient with ocular allergy
- •Contact lenses and allergic reactions
- •Managing contact lens wear in the patient with ocular allergy
- •Summary of contact lens use in patient with ocular allergy
- •References
- •Mucous membrane pemphigoid
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Linear immunoglobulin A disease
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Ocular pemphigus vulgaris
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Summary
- •References
- •Seborrheic dermatitis
- •Treatment
- •Vitiligo
- •Heliotrope rash
- •Port-wine stains
- •Xanthelasmas and plane xanthomas
- •Seborrheic keratosis
- •Skin tags
- •Warts
- •Comedones
- •Syringoma
- •Rosacea
- •Lipoid proteinosis
- •Angioedema
- •Contact urticaria
- •Erysipelas
- •Trichinosis
- •Chalazion
- •Hordeolum
- •Nevi
- •Sarcoid
- •Hemangioma
- •Basal cell carcinoma
- •Squamous cell carcinoma
- •Sebaceous carcinoma
- •Malignant melanoma
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Atopic dermatitis
- •Contact dermatitis
- •Acute, subacute, and chronic
- •Epidemiology
- •Irritant versus allergic
- •Etiologies
- •Irritation due to mascara and eye cosmetic preservatives
- •Fragrance
- •Irritation due to conjunctival deposition
- •Nail polish
- •Metals
- •Aeroallergens
- •Medications/eyedrops/contact lens solution
- •Paper
- •Plants
- •Histology
- •Diagnosis
- •Herpes simplex
- •Herpes zoster
- •Treatment considerations for the eyelids
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Infections
- •Urticaria and angiodema
- •Benign tumors and growths
- •Malignant tumors
- •‘‘Cosmetic’’ lesions of the eyelids
- •Vascular lesions
- •Vitiligo
- •Others
- •References
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis/herpes simplex virus infections
- •Treatment of infectious conjunctivitis
- •Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Neonatal conjunctivitis
- •Congenital glaucoma
- •Uveitis
- •References
- •Ocular Allergy Treatment
- •Ocular allergy treatment algorithm
- •Advisory nonprescription interventions
- •Environmental control
- •Cold compresses
- •Lubrication
- •Contact lenses
- •Decongestants
- •Antihistamines
- •Oral antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Levocabastine
- •Emedastine
- •Cromoglycate
- •Lodoxamide
- •Pemirolast
- •Ketorolac
- •Multiple action agents
- •Olopatadine
- •Ketotifen
- •Nedocromil
- •Azelastine
- •Epinastine
- •Mizolastine
- •Picumast
- •Amlexanox
- •Topical antihistamines and dry eye
- •Steroids
- •Ophthalmic steroids
- •Intranasal steroids
- •Immunomodulatory agents
- •Cyclosporine
- •Immunotherapy
- •Summary
- •References
170 |
WAGNER & AQUINO |
pharyngitis and feverdtermed pharyngoconunctival fever [6]. Adenoviral serotypes 8, 19, and 37 are responsible for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, resulting in loss of visual acuity due to corneal subepithelial infiltrates [7]. Otitis media with conjunctivitis is most often caused by nontypeable H influenzae. A child who has conjunctivitis, otitis media, fever, and mucopurluent rhinorrhea may have the conjunctivitis-otitis syndrome [8]. This particular association with otitis media and conjunctivitis was first described by Co ey [9] in 1966 and was coined the conjunctivitis-otitis syndrome by Bodor [8]. Because one fourth of patients who have conjunctivitis concurrently have otitis media, it is essential that all patients have their ears checked even in the absence of ear pain [8].
Bacterial conjunctivitis
Bacterial conjunctival infection is more likely to be accompanied by a purulent discharge than its viral or allergic counterparts. Although H influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and B catarrhalis are the most common etiologies overall, in the neonatal age group, agents such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Viridans streptococci, and Neisseria gonorrhea are other causative organisms [10–12].
The most common pathogens reported in pediatric bacterial conjunctivitis are H influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Fig. 1) [13,14]. The introduction of the H influenzae vaccine (HiB) in 1985 has not reduced the number of cases of conjunctivitis caused by this organism because most cases are caused by a nontypeable strain [15]. There are no data to indicate that the introduction of the heptavalent pneumococcal vaccine (PrevnarWyeth) has decreased the frequency of conjunctivitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae. In fact, there were two recent epidemics of conjunctivitis caused by nonencapsulated, nontypeable strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. One of these epidemics occurred on a college campus where more than 600 students were infected [16]. The second epidemic took place in an elementary
Fig. 1. Haemophilus influenzae conjunctivitis with purulent discharge in a 4-year-old child.
PEDIATRIC OCULAR INFLAMMATION |
171 |
school in Maine in December 2002 where 361 students (median age, 6 years) were infected [17]. These data suggest that the incidence of gram-positive bacterial conjunctivitis is increasing, particularly in children and young adults.
Children who have bacterial conjunctivitis usually present with complaints of itching and burning; on examination, purulent or mucopurulent discharge can be appreciated along with eyelid edema, conjunctival erythema, or both (Fig. 2) [3,18]. Although it is clinically di cult to distinguish bacterial from viral etiologies, certain clues, when present, may point toward a bacterial cause. In children younger than 6 years, bacterial causes of conjunctivitis predominant, whereas in children older than 6 years, adenoviruses are the leading pathogen [1]. Time of year is also a helpful clue: bacterial conjunctivitis occurs more frequently during the winter, whereas viral conjunctivitis occurs during the fall [1]. Association of otitis media with conjunctivitis and bilateral conjunctival disease points to a bacterial etiology [19]. Sinusitis and rhinitis can accompany conjunctivitis caused by pneumococci [1].
Viral conjunctivitis/herpes simplex virus infections
Most viral conjunctivitis is caused by Adenoviridae [19]. Overall, 20% of all cases of conjunctivitis are caused by this family of viral pathogens [10,20]. Infection with adenoviruses can manifest as follicular conjunctivitis, pharyngoconjunctival fever, epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, and acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis [3,5,21]. Pharyngoconjunctival fever is characterized by fever up to 104 F, pharyngitis, and conjunctivitis; it is caused primarily by human adenoviruses 3 and 7, and found in children younger than 10 years [22]. Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis is typically a disease of older children and adults; involvement of the cornea is the predominant finding on physical examination [22]. Adenoviral conjunctivitis is very contagious, with the virus transmitted in schools, workplaces, swimming pools, and medical
Fig. 2. Conjunctival injection with serous discharge in adenoviral conjunctivitis.
172 |
WAGNER & AQUINO |
o ces [2]. Most cases are spread through direct contact with infected persons or equipment [3]. Health care workers are encouraged to wear gloves, practice good hand washing, and clean instruments after patient contact [3]. Patients should also be encouraged to promote good hand washing and to separate towels of infected and noninfected family members [5]. Treatment is supportive, with symptoms lasting 1 to 3 weeks. Cold compresses, artificial tears, and topical vasoconstrictors may provide some relief [2]. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with topical ketorolac versus artificial tears for the treatment of viral conjunctivitis failed to show any statistical di erence in patient symptom score (discomfort, itching, foreign-body sensation, tearing, or eyelid swelling) or sign score (conjunctival injection, chemosis, mucous, or eyelid edema) [23]. Topical antibiotics are rarely needed because superinfection with bacterial pathogens is a rare occurrence [2].
Viral etiologies for conjunctivitis other than adenoviruses include ECHO virus, herpesviruses, enteroviruses, Epstein-Barr virus, influenza A virus, human coxsackieviruses, and Kawasaki disease. Patients present with conjunctival injection, watery discharge, conjunctival swelling, a tender preauricular node, and possibly foreign-body sensation [2]. Both eyes may be concurrently infected or the second eye may become involved a few days later; an associated upper respiratory infection may accompany the conjunctivitis [2].
Viral conjunctivitis caused by recurrent herpes simplex virus (HSV) can be vision threatening. Although primary infection usually has a self-limited course, recurrent disease can result in corneal opacification and loss of vision [1]. Primary infection peaks between age 1 and 5 years [3]. Recurrent disease primarily strikes in adulthood [24]. Most ocular infections in children are caused by HSV-1 as opposed to neonatal herpes eye disease, whereby HSV-2 is acquired at delivery [1]. Presentation of eye disease in primary HSV infection may be a nonspecific conjunctivitis (follicular response, serous discharge, and preauricular adenopathy) with or without vesicles of the surrounding skin (Fig. 3) [1]. Without these vesicles present, disease may not be distinguishable from other infectious forms of conjunctivitis. A helpful clue is that most herpetic conjunctivitis (80%) is unilateral [3]. The virus is transmitted from inoculation through direct contact with another individual who is shedding the virus or from autoinoculation of the conjunctiva from a primary infection elsewhere [3]. On examination, involvement of the cornea with the classic dendritic appearance is found in 50% of patients (Fig. 4) [5].
Secondary HSV disease may occur if the trigeminal ganglion is invaded during primary disease. Physical stress may precipitate the second outbreak. These patients now present with a di erent clinical picture: unilateral red eye with severe pain and sensation of a foreign body but without history of trauma or contact with a foreign body [1]. On examination, a dendritic ulcer on the corneal epithelium is a characteristic feature. Identification can be facilitated by the use of fluorescein dye and by examination with filtered cobalt
PEDIATRIC OCULAR INFLAMMATION |
173 |
Fig. 3. Periocular vesicles on the eyelids of a child who has primary HSV infection.
blue light [1]. Treatment can be established with topical agents such as trifluridine and vidarabine (limitations include frequent dosing of medication and di culty administering drops to the pediatric population). Systemic treatment with acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir may be needed in severe cases or to suppress recurrent lesions [2]. Topical steroids should be avoided because they lead to virus replication.
Treatment of infectious conjunctivitis
Viral conjunctivitis is largely a self-limited disease and not responsive to topical antibiotics. Topical antibiotics are used to treat bacterial conjunctivitis and as prophylaxis for ophthalmia neonatorum (discussed later) and nasolacrimal duct obstruction with purulent discharge (also discussed later) [25]. The e cacy of topical therapy was tested by Gigliotti and colleagues [26] who compared placebo to topical polymyxin-bacitracin ointment in
Fig. 4. Dendritic corneal ulcer in secondary herpetic infection.
Table 1
Treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis
Medication |
Class |
Dosage |
Adverse e ects |
Approximate cost |
|
|
|
|
|
Trimethoprim-polymixin B |
Combination |
Age O2 mo: 1 drop q 3 h |
Burning, stinging, itching, |
10 mL ¼ $33.99 |
(Polytrim) |
|
7–10 d |
eyelid edema, |
|
|
|
|
superinfection |
5 mL ¼ $20.99 |
Sodium sulfacetamide 10% |
Sulfonamide |
Age O2 mo: 1–2 drops |
Local irritation, stinging, |
|
(Bleph-10) |
|
q 2–3 h during the day |
burning, superinfection, |
|
|
|
7–10 d |
sensitization |
|
|
|
|
Severe: Stevens-Johnson |
|
|
|
|
syndrome |
5 mL ¼ $54.42 |
Ciprofloxacin 0.3% |
Quinolone |
Age O1 y: 1–2 drops q 2 h |
Burning, lid margin |
|
solution (Ciloxan) |
|
while awake 2 d, then |
crusting, scales, foreign- |
|
|
|
bid for the next 5 d |
body sensation, pruritus, |
|
|
|
|
conjunctival hyperemia |
5 mL ¼ $50.19 |
Ofloxacin solution |
Quinolone |
Age O1 y: 1–2 drops q 2 h |
Superinfection, |
|
(Ocuflox) |
|
while awake 2 d, then |
photophobia, |
|
|
|
qid for the next 5 d |
lacrimation, burning, |
|
|
|
|
stinging, redness, itching, |
|
|
|
|
dry eye |
|
|
|
|
Rare: anaphylaxis and |
|
|
|
|
Stevens-Johnson |
|
|
|
|
syndrome |
5 mL ¼ $49.05 |
Tobramycin 0.3% (Tobrex) |
Aminoglycoside |
1–2 drops q 4 h for mild |
Superinfection, itching, |
|
|
|
to moderate infections |
swelling, erythema |
|
|
|
|
Rare: thrombocytopenia |
|
|
|
|
and bronchospasm |
|
174
AQUINO & WAGNER
Erythromycin 0.5% |
Macrolide |
1-cm ribbon to lower |
Ocular irritation, erythema, |
3.5 g ¼ $7.99 |
ointment |
|
conjunctival sac up to |
hypersensitivity reactions |
|
|
|
6 per day 7–10 d |
|
3 mL ¼ $68.58 |
Moxifloxacin 0.5% solution |
Fluoroquinolone |
Age O1 yr: 1 drop tid 7 d |
Conjunctival irritation, |
|
(Vigamox) |
|
|
dry eye, visual acuity |
|
|
|
|
changes, ocular pain/ |
|
|
|
|
pruritus/redness |
|
|
|
|
Serious: hypersensitivity |
|
|
|
|
reaction, superinfection, |
|
|
|
|
subconjunctival |
|
|
|
|
hemorrhage |
5 mL ¼ $62.88 |
Gatifloxacin 0.3% solution |
Fluoroquinolone |
Age O1 yr: 1 drop q 2 h |
Conjunctival irritation, |
|
(Zymar) |
|
while awake 2 d, then |
lacrimation, dry eye, |
|
|
|
qid for 5 d |
ocular discharge/pain/ |
|
|
|
|
redness |
|
|
|
|
Serious: hypersensitivity |
|
|
|
|
reaction, superinfection, |
|
|
|
|
subconjunctival |
|
|
|
|
hemorrhage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFLAMMATION OCULAR PEDIATRIC
175
176 |
WAGNER & AQUINO |
children aged 1 month to 18 years. By day 8, both groups were cured (no significant P value). Treatments with topical antibiotics led to a faster cure and a greater likelihood of clearing the organism.
As previously stated, most causes of bacterial conjunctivitis are caused by gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, and treatment should be tailored accordingly. Options include trimethoprim-polymixin B (Polytrim), which has broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, is inexpensive, and has minimal side e ects (ocular irritation) (Table 1) [25]. Sodium sulfacetamide 10% (Bleph-10) is also an inexpensive option covering gram-positive organisms but causes significant stinging on application [25]. Topical fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin 0.3% (Ciloxan) and ofloxacin (Ocuflox) have broadspectrum coverage against gram-positive and gram-negative organisms but are more expensive choices [1]. Aminoglycosides are frequently prescribed for bacterial conjunctivitis; gentamicin and tobramycin have good gram-negative coverage but do not cover organisms such as Chlamydia, and corneal epithelial toxicity may be seen with extensive use [25]. Erythromycin is another inexpensive option with good gram-positive and Chlamydia coverage; however, it has poor activity against Haemophilus species, B catarrhalis, gram-negative organisms, and staphylococcal species [25]. Administration may be by drops or with ointment. Ointments tend to blur vision, which may be a consideration in school-aged children [1]. Overall, the side e ects of topical agents, including hypersensitivity, are local in nature, with systemic e ects being rare [25]. Neomycin preparations should be avoided because there is a higher likelihood of cell-mediated sensitivity to these agents [6].
Recently, fourth-generation topical fluoroquinolones have been introduced for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. These agents, including gatifloxacin 0.3% and moxifloxacin 0.5%, have increased e cacy against gram-positive organisms and reduced the potential for bacterial resistance [27]. Moxifloxacin is the only fluoroquinolone that can be administered in the less frequent, three-times-daily dosing schedule. The relatively low minimum inhibitory concentration of moxifloxacin for isolates of the common pathogens that cause pediatric conjunctivitis in addition to the high conjunctival tissue levels reached compared with other topical antibiotics make it ideal for eradicating the organism quickly and for subsequent rapid clinical cures [28]. A recent study demonstrated the need to exclude children with infectious conjunctivitis from school until clinical signs and symptoms are resolved. Treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis with the fourth-genera- tion fluoroquinolones may provide the opportunity to get children back to school the next day following initiation of treatment [29].
Combination therapies of antibiotics and corticosteroids are available. These therapies are not generally recommended unless a firm diagnosis is obtained because they are able to increase intraocular pressure with prolonged use and cause aggravation of ocular HSV infections (causing the virus to proliferate) [1].
