- •Dedication
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Ocular Allergy Overview
- •The ocular surface
- •Clinical examination
- •Immunopathophysiology of ocular allergy
- •Acute allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
- •Atopic keratoconjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Contact dermatitis of the eyelids
- •Blepharoconjunctivitis
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis
- •Vasomotor conjunctivitis
- •Ocular examination
- •Ophthalmic procedures and testing
- •Summary
- •References
- •Ocular Mast Cells and Mediators
- •Mast cell mediators
- •Preformed granule-associated mediators
- •Biogenic amines
- •Proteoglycans
- •Neutral proteases
- •Newly generated mediators
- •Lipid mediators
- •Cytokines
- •Mast cell heterogeneity
- •Phenotypic heterogeneity
- •Functional heterogeneity
- •Pharmacologic heterogeneity
- •Ocular mast cells
- •The normal eye
- •Mast cells in diseases of the eye
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal conjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Experimental autoimmune uveitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Allergic Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Examination
- •Seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
- •Perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Procedures
- •Late-phase reaction
- •Treatment
- •Antihistamines
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Lodoxamide tromethamine 0.1% (Alomide)
- •Ketorolac tromethamine (Acular)
- •Olopatadine (Patanol, Pataday)
- •Ketotifen (Zaditor)
- •Nedocromil (Alocril)
- •Pemirolast (Alamast)
- •Azelastine (Optivar)
- •Epinastine (Elestat)
- •Corticosteroids (Vexol, Lotemax)
- •Summary
- •References
- •Vernal Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical manifestation
- •Conjunctival signs
- •Limbal signs
- •Corneal signs
- •Pathogenesis
- •Laboratory evaluation
- •Allergy testing
- •Conjunctival examination
- •Tear evaluation
- •Ocular challenge test
- •Treatment
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Antihistamines
- •Corticosteroids
- •Immunosuppressive agents
- •Other medical therapies
- •Surgical therapy
- •Treatment of secondary infections
- •Hyposensitization and immunotherapy
- •Prognosis
- •References
- •Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis
- •Signs and symptoms
- •Stages of giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Epidemiology
- •Histopathology
- •Coated contact lenses
- •Pathophysiology
- •Treatment
- •Treatment for stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Recognizing marginal dry eye disease
- •Contact lens wear in patients with dry eye
- •The use of therapeutic contact lenses in dry eye
- •The use of contact lenses in a patient with ocular allergy
- •Contact lenses and allergic reactions
- •Managing contact lens wear in the patient with ocular allergy
- •Summary of contact lens use in patient with ocular allergy
- •References
- •Mucous membrane pemphigoid
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Linear immunoglobulin A disease
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Ocular pemphigus vulgaris
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Summary
- •References
- •Seborrheic dermatitis
- •Treatment
- •Vitiligo
- •Heliotrope rash
- •Port-wine stains
- •Xanthelasmas and plane xanthomas
- •Seborrheic keratosis
- •Skin tags
- •Warts
- •Comedones
- •Syringoma
- •Rosacea
- •Lipoid proteinosis
- •Angioedema
- •Contact urticaria
- •Erysipelas
- •Trichinosis
- •Chalazion
- •Hordeolum
- •Nevi
- •Sarcoid
- •Hemangioma
- •Basal cell carcinoma
- •Squamous cell carcinoma
- •Sebaceous carcinoma
- •Malignant melanoma
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Atopic dermatitis
- •Contact dermatitis
- •Acute, subacute, and chronic
- •Epidemiology
- •Irritant versus allergic
- •Etiologies
- •Irritation due to mascara and eye cosmetic preservatives
- •Fragrance
- •Irritation due to conjunctival deposition
- •Nail polish
- •Metals
- •Aeroallergens
- •Medications/eyedrops/contact lens solution
- •Paper
- •Plants
- •Histology
- •Diagnosis
- •Herpes simplex
- •Herpes zoster
- •Treatment considerations for the eyelids
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Infections
- •Urticaria and angiodema
- •Benign tumors and growths
- •Malignant tumors
- •‘‘Cosmetic’’ lesions of the eyelids
- •Vascular lesions
- •Vitiligo
- •Others
- •References
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis/herpes simplex virus infections
- •Treatment of infectious conjunctivitis
- •Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Neonatal conjunctivitis
- •Congenital glaucoma
- •Uveitis
- •References
- •Ocular Allergy Treatment
- •Ocular allergy treatment algorithm
- •Advisory nonprescription interventions
- •Environmental control
- •Cold compresses
- •Lubrication
- •Contact lenses
- •Decongestants
- •Antihistamines
- •Oral antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Levocabastine
- •Emedastine
- •Cromoglycate
- •Lodoxamide
- •Pemirolast
- •Ketorolac
- •Multiple action agents
- •Olopatadine
- •Ketotifen
- •Nedocromil
- •Azelastine
- •Epinastine
- •Mizolastine
- •Picumast
- •Amlexanox
- •Topical antihistamines and dry eye
- •Steroids
- •Ophthalmic steroids
- •Intranasal steroids
- •Immunomodulatory agents
- •Cyclosporine
- •Immunotherapy
- •Summary
- •References
126 |
ELCHAHAL et al |
with topical antibacterial agents such as mupirocin used for infected lesions. The use of dapsone or sulfapyridine is successful in most cases, and noticeable response to treatment may be seen within several days [61–64,77]. Treated disease lasting longer than a few weeks may benefit from adjunct therapy including prednisone, dicloxacillin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, and colchicine [77,78]. As in MMP, treatment of refractory cases with IVIG has shown e cacy [79–81]. Treatment of drug-induced LAD should begin with removal of the presumed causative agent. In cases of LAD induced by vancomycin, new lesions stop forming within approximately 2 weeks of cessation [67,68,82]. In persistent cases of drug-induced LAD, a short oral steroid course may be beneficial [60,61].
Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita
Clinical features
EBA is an autoimmune blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes that is mediated by IgG autoantibodies against type VII collagen [83]. A small subset of EBA, however, is known to be due to IgA rather than to IgG [84]. Type VII collagen is a major component of the anchoring fibrils in the lamina densa of the epithelial basement membrane. There are three di erent phenotypes of this disease: mechanobullous, inflammatory, and cicatricial pemphigoid. The disease is rare, with an estimated annual incidence of 0.25 per 1 million in Western Europe [85]. The male-to-female ratio is 1:1.4, and it has been noted that patients of Korean descent have a higher predilection for EBA [86]. HLA-DR2 depicts hyperimmunity that is seen in EBA and in bullous forms of pemphigoid, pointing to an autoimmune etiology for these entities. Immunogenetic studies on EBA reveal that most black patients from the southeastern part of the United States have an association with HLA-DR2. Subsequent studies on a larger population of white patients failed to reveal any statistically significant HLA allele associations with EBA [87].
EBA typically presents in the third to fifth decade, with patients exhibiting various aspects of chronic conjunctivitis, symblepharon formation, keratitis, subepithelial corneal vesiculation, perforation, and possibly opacification. EBA presents with scarring blisters and milia at sites of trauma, such as elbows, knees, and buttocks and the dorsa of the hands and feet. The scarring nature of EBA can lead to nail destruction and hair loss [85,88]. EBA is most commonly nonor mildly inflammatory, manifested as tense vesicles and bullae. The blisters may be hemorrhagic and rupture easily, with subsequent erosion [89]. Other subsets of patients may also have mucosal involvement that can mimic MMP or can present with inflammatory blisters that mimic bullous pemphigoid. The blisters of patients who have the classic mechanobullous noninflammatory EBA resemble those in adult or child dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa because both disease
OCULAR MANIFESTATIONS OF BLISTERING DISEASES |
127 |
processes involve type VII collagen [90]. These lesions can also mimic bullous lupus erythematosus and porphyria cutanea tarda in the elderly, whereas the inflammatory form of EBA can resemble bullous pemphigoid because these blisters are tense and widespread [91].
Despite frequent mucous membrane involvement in EBA, this is usually limited to oral mucosa, and is then termed the cicatricial pemphigoid form of EBA [89]. EBA can also involve the nasal, pharyngeal, ocular, and esophageal mucosa or, in children, the oral mucosa, genitals, and ocular mucosa, causing symblepharon formation. In very severe cases (most notably cases mediated by IgA), total blindness has been reported [92,93].
Diagnostic studies
Various tests are used to diagnose EBA, including direct and indirect immunofluorescence, fluorescent overlay antigen mapping, immunoelectron microscopy, Western immunoblotting, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [94]. Laboratory tests including urine porphyrin levels and antinuclear antibody are used to exclude porphyria cutanea tarda and to search for evidence of bullous systemic lupus erythematosus, which is also characterized by antibodies directed against type VII collagen. To diagnose EBA, histopathology from the edge of a new blister, direct immunofluorescence on normal-appearing perilesional skin, and indirect immunofluorescence with the patient’s serum on salt-split normal human skin substrate should be obtained [79]. The histopathology of EBA shows subepidermal blisters, with the epidermis remaining intact. In addition, there is a dermal infiltrate composed of monocytes and neutrophils, which is minimal in the classic form of EBA and more abundant in the inflammatory form [92]. Direct immunofluorescence reveals the immune-mediated disease process, with a thick band of IgG and, to a lesser extent, C3 deposited linearly at the BMZ [91]. Other immunoreactants such as IgM or IgA may also be seen. Indirect immunofluorescence demonstrates the presence of IgG antibodies directed toward type VII collagen and is used to di erentiate EBA from bullous pemphigoid [95]. The IgG autoantibodies in patients who have bullous pemphigoid bind to the epidermal roof of salt-split skin, whereas the dermal floor pattern of indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin substrate is also found in sera of patients who have bullous systemic lupus erythematosus and antiepiligrin cicatricial pemphigoid [94]. In immunoblotting, circulating autoantibodies bind a dermal protein of 290 kDa identified as type VII collagen, whereas detection of anti-type VII collagen antibodies by ELISA uses fusion proteins corresponding to di erent portions of the noncollagenous domain of type VII collagen [96].
Although the precise role of autoantibodies against type VII collagen is unknown, it has been hypothesized that they disrupt the assembly of type VII collagen into anchoring fibrils and interfere with their interactions with other extracellular matrix molecules [97]. Lesional skin histology initially reveals
