- •Dedication
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Ocular Allergy Overview
- •The ocular surface
- •Clinical examination
- •Immunopathophysiology of ocular allergy
- •Acute allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
- •Atopic keratoconjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Contact dermatitis of the eyelids
- •Blepharoconjunctivitis
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis
- •Vasomotor conjunctivitis
- •Ocular examination
- •Ophthalmic procedures and testing
- •Summary
- •References
- •Ocular Mast Cells and Mediators
- •Mast cell mediators
- •Preformed granule-associated mediators
- •Biogenic amines
- •Proteoglycans
- •Neutral proteases
- •Newly generated mediators
- •Lipid mediators
- •Cytokines
- •Mast cell heterogeneity
- •Phenotypic heterogeneity
- •Functional heterogeneity
- •Pharmacologic heterogeneity
- •Ocular mast cells
- •The normal eye
- •Mast cells in diseases of the eye
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Vernal conjunctivitis
- •Giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Experimental autoimmune uveitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Allergic Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Examination
- •Seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
- •Perennial allergic conjunctivitis
- •Procedures
- •Late-phase reaction
- •Treatment
- •Antihistamines
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Lodoxamide tromethamine 0.1% (Alomide)
- •Ketorolac tromethamine (Acular)
- •Olopatadine (Patanol, Pataday)
- •Ketotifen (Zaditor)
- •Nedocromil (Alocril)
- •Pemirolast (Alamast)
- •Azelastine (Optivar)
- •Epinastine (Elestat)
- •Corticosteroids (Vexol, Lotemax)
- •Summary
- •References
- •Vernal Conjunctivitis
- •History
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical manifestation
- •Conjunctival signs
- •Limbal signs
- •Corneal signs
- •Pathogenesis
- •Laboratory evaluation
- •Allergy testing
- •Conjunctival examination
- •Tear evaluation
- •Ocular challenge test
- •Treatment
- •Mast cell stabilizers
- •Antihistamines
- •Corticosteroids
- •Immunosuppressive agents
- •Other medical therapies
- •Surgical therapy
- •Treatment of secondary infections
- •Hyposensitization and immunotherapy
- •Prognosis
- •References
- •Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis
- •Signs and symptoms
- •Stages of giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Epidemiology
- •Histopathology
- •Coated contact lenses
- •Pathophysiology
- •Treatment
- •Treatment for stage 1: preclinical giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 2: mild giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 3: moderate giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Treatment for stage 4: severe giant papillary conjunctivitis
- •Summary
- •References
- •Recognizing marginal dry eye disease
- •Contact lens wear in patients with dry eye
- •The use of therapeutic contact lenses in dry eye
- •The use of contact lenses in a patient with ocular allergy
- •Contact lenses and allergic reactions
- •Managing contact lens wear in the patient with ocular allergy
- •Summary of contact lens use in patient with ocular allergy
- •References
- •Mucous membrane pemphigoid
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Linear immunoglobulin A disease
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Ocular pemphigus vulgaris
- •Clinical features
- •Diagnostic studies
- •Disease course and treatment
- •Summary
- •References
- •Seborrheic dermatitis
- •Treatment
- •Vitiligo
- •Heliotrope rash
- •Port-wine stains
- •Xanthelasmas and plane xanthomas
- •Seborrheic keratosis
- •Skin tags
- •Warts
- •Comedones
- •Syringoma
- •Rosacea
- •Lipoid proteinosis
- •Angioedema
- •Contact urticaria
- •Erysipelas
- •Trichinosis
- •Chalazion
- •Hordeolum
- •Nevi
- •Sarcoid
- •Hemangioma
- •Basal cell carcinoma
- •Squamous cell carcinoma
- •Sebaceous carcinoma
- •Malignant melanoma
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Atopic dermatitis
- •Contact dermatitis
- •Acute, subacute, and chronic
- •Epidemiology
- •Irritant versus allergic
- •Etiologies
- •Irritation due to mascara and eye cosmetic preservatives
- •Fragrance
- •Irritation due to conjunctival deposition
- •Nail polish
- •Metals
- •Aeroallergens
- •Medications/eyedrops/contact lens solution
- •Paper
- •Plants
- •Histology
- •Diagnosis
- •Herpes simplex
- •Herpes zoster
- •Treatment considerations for the eyelids
- •Eyelid dermatitis
- •Infections
- •Urticaria and angiodema
- •Benign tumors and growths
- •Malignant tumors
- •‘‘Cosmetic’’ lesions of the eyelids
- •Vascular lesions
- •Vitiligo
- •Others
- •References
- •Bacterial conjunctivitis
- •Viral conjunctivitis/herpes simplex virus infections
- •Treatment of infectious conjunctivitis
- •Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
- •Allergic conjunctivitis
- •Neonatal conjunctivitis
- •Congenital glaucoma
- •Uveitis
- •References
- •Ocular Allergy Treatment
- •Ocular allergy treatment algorithm
- •Advisory nonprescription interventions
- •Environmental control
- •Cold compresses
- •Lubrication
- •Contact lenses
- •Decongestants
- •Antihistamines
- •Oral antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Topical antihistamines
- •Levocabastine
- •Emedastine
- •Cromoglycate
- •Lodoxamide
- •Pemirolast
- •Ketorolac
- •Multiple action agents
- •Olopatadine
- •Ketotifen
- •Nedocromil
- •Azelastine
- •Epinastine
- •Mizolastine
- •Picumast
- •Amlexanox
- •Topical antihistamines and dry eye
- •Steroids
- •Ophthalmic steroids
- •Intranasal steroids
- •Immunomodulatory agents
- •Cyclosporine
- •Immunotherapy
- •Summary
- •References
124 |
ELCHAHAL et al |
blistering diseases, LSCT is playing an increasing role in treatment as techniques are advanced [8,9,54–59]. When LSCT and PKP are unsuccessful, keratoprostheses o er another option for rehabilitation of vision [1,2,50,52–59].
Linear immunoglobulin A disease
Clinical features
LAD patients commonly complain of ocular symptoms including eye pain, dry eyes, foreign-body sensation, burning, or ocular discharge. Even in the absence of ocular complaints, slit-lamp examination may reveal fine conjunctival scarring, subconjunctival fibrosis, and subsequent inner canthal architecture loss, inferior forniceal foreshortening, trichiasis, entropion, and symblepharon formation with secondary corneal opacification. The ocular changes may be clinically indistinguishable from those of MMP. Because ocular involvement is common (w50% of LAD patients) and may be asymptomatic, all LAD patients should undergo ophthalmologic examination [60].
LAD is a rare disease characterized by circulating autoimmune antibodies to the epithelial BMZ, with the prevalence estimated to be 0.6 cases per 100,000 adults in Utah [61]. Internationally, estimates include incidences of 1 case per 250,000 individuals per year in southern England, and 0.13 cases per 250,000 individuals in France [62]. Association with HLA-B8 has been noted, and LAD patients present in a bimodal age distribution, with pediatric disease presenting at a mean age of 3.3 to 4.5 years and adult cases at a mean age of 52 years [63–66]. Maleand femalepatients are equally a ected and typically present witha lengthened prodrome of a pruritus or cutaneous burning sensation before emergence of lesions classically characterized as annular tense bullae, resembling a ‘‘string of pearls’’ or ‘‘cluster of jewels’’ surrounding a patch of erythematous skin [61]. Lesions typically involve the perioral region, perineum, and extremities. In addition, mucous membrane involvement is seen in adults, with oral, genital, and conjunctival lesions that can result in scarring. These lesions may appear gradually or, in drug-associated cases, more acutely [61,63,64].
Associations between LAD and various suspected etiologies include drug-induced (most commonly vancomycin hydrochloride) cases, which are more common in adults due to treatment with multiple medical therapies for comorbid conditions [67–69]. Other suspected drugs associated with one or several cases of LAD include captopril, amiodarone, and phenytoin [70–73]. Thus, the clinician should examine the presenting patient’s medication regimen for possible iatrogenic causes. Other associations have been considered, including preceding illness, malignancy, and coexistence with other autoimmune disorders [61,64,69].
Diagnostic studies
Histopathologic examination of cutaneous blisters in LAD reveals characteristic findings including neutrophil alignment along the BMZ and
OCULAR MANIFESTATIONS OF BLISTERING DISEASES |
125 |
subepidermal cleavage with inflammatory cells in the upper dermis. In some cases, neutrophilic microabscesses may form within the papillary ridges. Mature lesions reveal subepidermal blistering with a predominantly neutrophilic infiltrate, although eosinophils and monocytes may be present. In patients who have atypical presentations, additional testing including bacterial culture and Gram stain of blister fluid to rule out bullous impetigo and Tzanck smear to rule out herpesvirus infection may be diagnostically informative [60,61,64,66].
As in MMP, biopsy and immunofluorescent study are the predominant modalities used to confirm the diagnosis of LAD. Direct immunofluorescent assay of involved and spared areas of skin shows corresponding linear IgA (and less frequently IgG or IgM) and complement C3 deposition along the basement membrane [60,74]. Similar deposition is observed with analysis of conjunctival and oral mucosa in a ected patients [60,74]. Addition of indirect immunofluorescence or direct immunoelectron microscopy techniques increases sensitivity, with the former identifying circulating anti-BMZ autoantibodies in approximately one half of LAD patients [60,74]. Circulating autoantibody titers are characteristically higher in children than in adults but are generally a low-frequency finding in both age groups. The use of immunoperoxidase in indirect and direct immunoelectron microscopy localizes immunoglobulin deposition to the lamina lucida and to the target antigen LAD-1, secreted by keratinocytes as a component of the anchoring filament [60,66,74]. Immunoblotting and immunoelectron microscopy studies show reactivity between LAD sera and several di erent antigenic targets [75,76]. Prediction of a particular patient’s disease course or clinical response to treatment should take this intradisease variability into account because patients are less treatment responsive in cases in which type VII collagen is the molecular target antigen [64]. Because these diseases may present with indistinguishable clinical pictures, this would explain the variation in the clinical picture and therapeutic responses seen with LAD [75,76].
Disease course and treatment
LAD typically follows an exacerbating and remitting disease course, with the possibility of progression to blindness. Overall, remission occurs in 64% of children, usually within 2 years from symptomatic onset [61,66]. Adult patients experience less frequent (48%) remission and a more prolonged disease course lasting an average of 5 to 6 years [61–66]. Drug-induced cases typically resolve quickly with identification and withdrawal of the o ending agent [67–73]. Although ocular and oral lesions may leave persistent scarring as in the case with MMP, cutaneous lesions usually heal without scarring. Involvement of the other gastrointestinal and genitourinary mucous membranes may coexist [60].
Localized treatment addresses the mucosal and cutaneous lesions, although bullae do not usually require specific care beyond hygienic dressings,
