Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.32 Mб
Скачать

Epidemiology of Uveal Melanoma

39

and oculodermal melanocytosis [44]. In a recent population-based case-control study in Australia, there was increased risk of choroidal and ciliary body melanoma associated with non-brown eye color, four or more cutaneous nevi on the back, inability to tan, and squinting while outside in the sun as a child [45]. Previous history of nonocular malignancy also has been examined as a risk factor, with equivocal results [46–49].

B.Hormones and Reproductive Factors

The role of hormones and reproductive factors has been investigated, with equivocal results. Reports of increased incidence in women of childbearing age [13,50] or disease occurrence associated with pregnancy [40,51,52] suggest an effect of hormones, but results from case-control studies examining specific hormonal factors have been inconsistent [53,54]. A recent evaluation of enucleated eyes did not support the presence of type I estrogen receptors in human uveal melanoma [55], which concurred with a previous analysis using similar modern estrogen receptor testing methods [56].

C.Genetic Susceptibility

Physiological changes or genetic modifications may be associated with the occurrence of uveal melanoma, although there have not been consistent findings among studies. There are equivocal findings regarding the role of genetics in the development of uveal melanoma. Several studies have documented family clustering of uveal melanoma [57,58], bilateral occurrence of uveal melanoma [59,60], or associations with cutaneous melanoma [43,60], suggesting a genetic or heritable component. The occurrence of uveal melanoma within members of a family and across generations suggests inheritance may play a role [61–63]. Recently, the clinical cases of three siblings afflicted with uveal melanoma were reported; all three patients were diagnosed before the age of 40 years and developed aggressive disease [64].

The role of genes has been implicated in the pathogenesis of both cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer and also has been investigated in uveal melanoma. In a study of 49 samples, there was no association between uveal melanoma and c-Ha-ras proto-oncogene point mutations nor genetic alterations in the c-Ki-ras-2 gene at codons 12, 13, and 61 [65]. Similarly, allelic variations for the melancortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene do not appear to play a role in the development of uveal melanoma [66]. There are inconclusive findings regarding the role of CDKN2 (p16) gene as a tumor suppressor gene in uveal melanoma [67,68]. Specific genetic mutations, such as chromosomal deletions [69] or mutations in the p53 tumor-suppressor gene [70] have also been reported. In addition, germline brca2 mutations may occur in a small proportion of uveal melanoma cases [71].

Although no common germline mutations have been identified in families with members having both ocular and cutaneous melanoma, animal models have suggested a common hereditary factor [72]. The identification of genetic loci that contribute to the family aggregation of ocular and cutaneous melanoma or other cancer requires further investigation. However, the majority of reported uveal melanoma cases are not associated with factors typical of diseases with strong genetic etiology; thus, even if there is a genetic component, it is likely that

40

Diener-West and Moy

environmental or other factors are more important in triggering development of disease.

D.Environmental or Occupational Exposures

A key to the prevention of uveal melanoma is the identification of environmental or occupational exposures that place individuals at higher risk of developing the disease. Sunlight exposure and UV radiation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cutaneous melanoma [73]. They also may play a role in the etiology of uveal melanoma but the association of environmental UV exposure and uveal melanoma is less clear than for cutaneous melanoma [17,74,75]. Studies evaluating tumor location in relation to presumed distribution of ultraviolet radiation exposure to the uvea have been contradictory [76,77], and the vulnerability of the uvea to UV radiation is not clear [78,79].

Occupational exposures to UV light or chemicals may also be involved in the etiology of uveal melanoma. Previous studies have suggested an association between uveal melanoma and use of sunlamps [36], intense sun exposure [80], and tendency to sunburn [36,39,81] . Occupational exposure to UV light among welders [82,83] or exposure to asbestos and chemicals in the workplace has been associated with increased risk of uveal melanoma [82,84–86]. However, differences in study designs and occupational coding schemes as well as selection biases influence both study findings and interpretation [87].

Exposure to radiofrequency radiation (in the form of radio sets and mobile phones) was recently shown to be associated with uveal melanoma in a case-control study from Germany [88]. Potential confounding variables that were not investigated in this study, such as occupational or recreational exposure to ultraviolet radiation, may account for the observed associations [89]. Conversely, an analysis of the incidence rate of uveal melanoma showed no correlation with the increase in mobile phone usage over time in Denmark [90]; further research is needed before recommendations can be made [91]. If radiofrequency radiation is in fact causative, future studies may demonstrate increasing incidence of uveal melanoma as these technologies become increasingly ubiquitous.

V.DETECTION OF UVEAL MELANOMA

Knowledge of the potential risk factors or predisposing elements for uveal melanoma would aid in early screening and detection of uveal melanoma. In Finland, 87% of patients had symptoms, mainly blurred vision and a visual field defect, before seeking an appointment with the health care system [31]. In the United Kingdom, most ocular melanomas are detected by optometrists [92]. An analysis of 223 patients presenting to optometrists between 1997 and 2000 revealed that as many as 45% of all detected tumors occurred in asymptomatic patients and would have been missed without appropriate screening. Also, tumors in patients with symptoms were less likely to be detected when there was reduced visual acuity, the anterior tumor margin was located anterior to the ora serrata, or the posterior margin was located in the pre-equatorial choroid [92]. The diagnosis of uveal melanoma by retinal specialists and other ophthalmologists has reached a high degree of accuracy

Epidemiology of Uveal Melanoma

41

due to improved indirect ophthalmoscopy, fluorescein angiography, and echography [3].

VI. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

In spite of the large amount of epidemiologic research that has been conducted to date, our understanding of the magnitude, distribution, and risk factors for uveal melanoma is incomplete. The future of research in the epidemiology of uveal melanoma will depend to a great extent on advances in molecular biology and genetics to facilitate more precise case definition and to form a more solid ground for evaluation of the interaction between host characteristics, genetic factors, and environment and in the pathogenesis of disease. Histopathology and tissue repositories such as that developed from the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study [93] provide a rich source for future exploration of genetic characteristics and susceptibility. Future epidemiologic investigations will also be important to better define subgroups of individuals at increased risk of disease so that screening and programs of primary and secondary prevention can be appropriately focused. Finally, research is needed to elucidate the potential biological mechanisms through which implicated exposures may cause melanoma.

REFERENCES

1.Seddon JM, Moy CS. Epidemiology of uveal melanoma. In: Ryan SJ, ed. Retina. Vol 1: Basic Sciences and Inherited Retinal Disease/Tumors, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2001, pp 664–672.

2.Seddon JM, Egan K. Application of epidemiologic methods to the study of eye disease: uveal melanoma. In: Albert DM, Jacobiec FA, eds. The Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1993, pp 1245–1249.

3.Sahel JA, Polans AS, Mehta MP, Auchter RM, Albert DM. Intraocular melanomas. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2001, pp 2070–2090.

4.Egan KM, Seddon JM, Glynn RJ, Gragoudas ES, Albert DM. Epidemiologic aspects of uveal melanoma. Surv Ophthalmol 32:239–251, 1988.

5.Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. Accuracy of diagnosis of choroidal melanoma in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. COMS Report No. 1. Arch Ophthalmol 108:1268–1273, 1990.

6.Margo CE. The accuracy of diagnosis of posterior uveal melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:434–444, 1997.

7.Mahoney MC, Burnett WS, Majerovics A, Tanenbaum H. The epidemiology of ophthalmic malignancies in New York State. Ophthalmology 97:1143–1147, 1990.

8.Jensen OA, Prause JU. Malignant melanomas of the human uvea in Denmark: Incidence and a 25 year follow-up of cases diagnosed between 1943 and 1952. In: Lommatzsch PK, Blodi FC, eds: Intraocular Tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp 85–92.

9.Teikari JM, Raivio I. Incidence of choroidal malignant melanomas in Finland in the years 1973–1980. Acta Ophthalmol 63:661–665, 1985.

10.Hook EB, Regal RR. The value of capture-recapture methods even for apparent exhaustive surveys. The need for adjustment for source of ascertainment intersection in attempted complete prevalence studies. Am J Epidemiol 135:1060–1067, 1992.

42

Diener-West and Moy

11.Jensen OA. Malignant melanomas of the uvea in Denmark 1943–1952: A clinical, histopathological and prognostic study. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (Copenh) 75:17–78, 1963.

12.Osterlind A. Trends in incidence of ocular malignant melanoma in Denmark 1943–1982. Int J Cancer 40:161–164, 1987.

13.Scotto JS, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Lee JAH: Melanomas of the eye and other non-cutaneous site: Epidemiologic aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst 56:489–491, 1976.

14.Swerdlow AJ. Epidemiology of melanoma of the eye in the Oxford region, 1952–1978. Br J Cancer 47:311–313, 1983.

15.Moy CS. Case-control designs for clinical research in ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol 116:661–664, 1998.

16.Stang A, Ahrens W, Anastassiou G, Bornfeld N, Jockel KH. Methodological aspects and problems of a hospital-based case-control study on uveal melanoma. A case study. Stud Health Technol Inform 77:111–113, 2000.

17.Moy CS. Evidence for the role of sunlight exposure in the etiology of choroidal melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 119:430–431, 2001.

18.Young JL, Percy CL, Asire AJ, Berg JW, Cusano MM, Gloeckler LA, Horn JW, Lourie WI, Jr, Pollack ES, Shambaugh EM. Cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1973–1977. Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 57:1–187, 1981.

19.Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Edwards BK, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. 1973–1999. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1999/

20.Birdsell JM, Gunther BK, Boyd TA, Grace M, Jerry LM. Ocular melanoma: A population-based study. Can J Ophthalmol 15:9–12, 1980.

21.Abrahamsson M. Malignant melanoma of the choroid and the ciliary body 1956–1975 in Halland and Gothenburg: Incidence, histopathology and prognosis. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 61:600–610, 1983.

22.Hakulinen T, Teppo L, Saxen E. Cancer of the eye, a review of trends and differentials. World Health Stat Q 31:143–158, 1978.

23.Iscovich J, Abdulrazik M, Pe’er J. Posterior uveal malignant melanoma: Temporal stability and ethnic variation in rates in Israel. Anticancer Res 21(2B):1449–1454, 2001.

24.Huerta C, Garcia Rodriquez LA. Incidence of ocular melanoma in the general population and in glaucoma patients. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:338–339, 2001.

25.Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J, eds. Cancer in Five Continents, vol. VIII. IARC Scientific Pub. No. 143. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1997.

26.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden. GLOBOCAN 2000. Int J Cancer 94:153–156, 2001.

27.American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA. 2002.

28.Cutler SJ, Young JL, eds. Third National Cancer Survey: Incidence data. NCI Monogr 41:1–454, 1975.

29.Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma. Cancer 83:1664–1678, 1998.

30.Edwards BK, Howe HL, Ries LAG, Thun MJ, Rosenberg HM, Yancik R, Wingo PA, Jemal A, Feigal EG. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on US cancer burden. Cancer 94:2766–2792, 2002.

31.Eskelin S, Kivela T. Mode of presentation and time to treatment of uveal melanoma in Finland. Br J Ophthalmol 86:333–338, 2002.

Epidemiology of Uveal Melanoma

43

32.Miller B, Abrahams C, Cole GC, Proctor NS. Ocular malignant melanoma in South African blacks. Br J Ophthalmol 65:720–722, 1981.

33.Kuo PK, Puliafito CA, Wang KM, Liu HS, Wu BF. Uveal melanoma in China. Int Ophthalmol Clin 22:57–71, 1982.

34.Neugut AI, Kizelnik-Freilich S, Ackerman C. Black-white differences in risk for cutaneous, ocular and visceral melanomas. Am J Public Health 84:1828–1829, 1994.

35.Iscovich J, Ackerman C, Andreev H, Pe’er J, Steinitz R. An epidemiological study of posterior uveal melanoma in Israel. 1961–1989. Int J Cancer 61:291–295, 1995.

36.Seddon JM, Gragoudas ES, Glynn RJ, Egan KM, Albert DM, Blitzer PH. Host factors, UV radiation, and risk of uveal melanoma. A case-control study. Arch Ophthalmol 108:1274–1280, 1990.

37.Biswas J, Krishnakumar S, Shanmugan MP. Uveal melanoma in Asian Indians: A clinicopathological study. Arch Ophthalmol 120:522–523, 2002.

38.Gallagher RP, Elwood JM, Rootman J, Spinelli JJ, Hill GB, Threlfall WJ, Birdsell JM. Risk factors for ocular melanoma: Western Canada Melanoma Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 74:775–778, 1985.

39.Holly EA, Aston DA, Char DH, Kristiansen JJ, Ahn DK. Uveal melanoma in relation to ultraviolet light exposure and host factors. Cancer Res 50:5773–5777, 1990.

40.Tucker MA, Shields JA, Hartge P, Augsburger J, Hoover RN, Fraumeni JF Jr. Sunlight exposure as risk factor for intraocular malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med 313:789–792, 1985.

41.Ganley JP, Comstock GW. Benign nevi and malignant melanomas of the choroid. Am J Ophthalmol 76:19–25, 1973.

42.Hammer H, Olah J, Toth-Molnar E. Dysplastic nevi are a risk factor for uveal melanoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 6:742–747, 1996.

43.Albert DM, Chang MA, Lamping K, Weiter J, Sober A. The dysplastic nevus syndrome: A pedigree with primary malignant melanomas of the choroid and skin. Ophthalmology 92:1728–1734, 1985.

44.Singh AD, De Potter P, Fijal BA, Shields CL, Shields JA, Elston RC. Lifetime prevalence of uveal melanoma in white patients with oculo(dermal) melanocytosis. Ophthalmology 105:195–198, 1998.

45.Vajdic CM, Kricker A, Giblin M, McKenzie J, Aitken J, Giles GG, Armstrong BK. Eye color and cutaneous nevi predict risk of ocular melanoma in Australia. Int J Cancer 92:906–912, 2001.

46.Holly EA, Aston DA, Ahn DK, Kristiansen JJ, Char DH. No excess prior cancer in patients with uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology 98:608–611, 1991.

47.Lischko AM, Seddon JM, Gragoudas ES, Egan KM, Glynn RJ. Evaluation of prior primary malignancy as a determinant of uveal melanoma: A case-control study. Ophthalmology 96:1716–1721, 1989.

48.Travis LB, Curtis RE, Boice JD, Platz CE, Hankey BF, Fraumeni JF. Second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 56:1564–1570, 1996.

49.Turner BJ, Siatkowski RM, Augsburger JJ, Shields JA, Lustbader E, Mastrangelo MJ. Other cancers in uveal melanoma patients and their families. Am J Opthalmol 107:601– 608, 1989.

50.Lee JA, Storer BE. Excess of malignant melanomas in women in the British Isles. Lancet 2:1337–1339, 1980.

51.Seddon JM, MacLaughlin DT, Albert DM, Gragoudas ES, Ferrence M. Uveal melanomas presenting during pregnancy and the investigation of estrogen receptors in melanomas. Br J Ophthlamol 66:695–704, 1982.

52.Shields CL, Shields JA, Eagle RC, DePotter P, Merduke H. Uveal melanoma and pregnancy: A report of 16 cases. Ophthalmology 98:1667–1673, 1991.

44

Diener-West and Moy

53.Hartge P, Tucker MA, Shields JA, Augsburger J, Hoover RN, Fraumeni JF. Case-control study of female hormones and eye melanoma. Cancer Res 49:4622–4625, 1989.

54.Holly EA, Aston DA, Ahn DK, Kristiansen JJ, Char DH. Uveal melanoma, hormonal and reproductive factors in women. Cancer Res 51:1370–1372, 1991.

55.Grostern RJ, Slusker-Shternfeld I, Bacus SS, Gilchrist K, Zimbric ML, Albert DM. Absence of type I estrogen receptors in choroidal melanoma: Analysis of Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 131:788–791, 2001.

56.Foss AJ, Alexander RA, Guille MJ, Unngerford JI, McCartney ACE, Lightman S. Estrogren and progesterone receptor analysis in ocular melanoma. Ophthalmology 102:431–456, 1995.

57.Singh AD, Shields CL, Shields JA, Eagle RC, De Potter P. Uveal melanoma and familial atypical mole and melanoma (FAM-M) syndrome. Ophthalm Genet 16:53–61, 1995.

58.Young LH, Egan KM, Walsh SM, Gragoudas ES. Familial uveal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol 117:516–520, 1994.

59.Singh AD, Shields CL, Shields JA, DePotter PL: Bilateral primary uveal melanomas. Bad luck or bad genes? Ophthalmology 103:256–262, 1996.

60.Oosterhuis JA, Went LN, Lynch HT. Primary choroidal and cutaneous melanomas, bilateral choroidal melanomas, and familial occurrence of melanomas. Br J Ophthalmol 66:230–233, 1982.

61.Walker JP, Weiter JJ, Albert DM, Osborn El, Weichselbaum RR. Uveal malignant melanoma in three generations of the same family. Am J Ophthalmol 88:723–726, 1979.

62.Canning CR, Hungerford J. Familial uveal melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol 72:241–243, 1988.

63.Singh AD, Wang MX, Donoso LA, Shields CL, DePotter PD, Shields JA, Elston RC, Fijal B. Familial uveal melanoma. III. Is the occurrence of family uveal melanoma conincidental? Arch Ophthalmol 114:1101–1104, 1996.

64.Krygier G, Lombardo K, Vargas C, Alvbez I, Costa R, Ros M, Echenique M, Navarro V, Delgado L, Viola A, Muse I. Familial uveal melanoma: Report on three sibling cases. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1007–1008, 2001.

65.Soparker CN, O’Brien JM, Albert DM. Investigation of the role of the ras protooncogene point mutation in human uveal melanomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2203–2209, 1993.

66.Metzelaar-Blok JAW, ter Huurne JAC, Hurks MHM, Keunen JEE, Jager MJ, Gruis NA. Characterization of melanocortin-1 receptor gene variants in uveal melanoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1951–1954, 2001.

67.Singh AD, Croce CM, Wary KK, Shields JA, Donoso LA, Shields CL, Huebner K, Ohta M. Familial uveal melanoma: Absence of germline mutations involving the cyclin dependent kinase-4 inhibitor gene (p16). Ophthalmic Genet 17:39–40, 1996.

68.Merbs SL, Sidransky D. Analysis of p16 (CDKN2/MTS-1/1NK4A) alterations in primary sporadic uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:779–783, 1999.

69.Mukai S, Dryja TP. Loss of alleles at polymorphic loci on chromosome 2 in uveal melanoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 22:45–53, 1986.

70.Jay M, McCartney AC. Familial malignant melanoma of the uvea and p53: A Victorian detective story. Surv Ophthalmol 37:457–462, 1993.

71.Sinilnikova OM, Egan KM, QuinnJL, Boutrand L, Lenoir GM, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Desjardins L, Levy C, Goldgar D, Gragoudas ES. Germ-line brca2 sequence variants in patients with ocular melanoma. Int J Cancer 82:325–328, 1999.

72.Bradl, Klein-Szanto A, Porter S, Mintz B. Malignant melanoma in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:164–168, 1991.

73.Whiteman DC, Green AC. Melanoma and sun exposure: Where are we now? Int J Dermatol 38:481–489, 1999.

Epidemiology of Uveal Melanoma

45

74.Dolin PJ, Foss AJ, Hungerford JL. Uveal melanoma: Is solar ultraviolet radiation a risk factor? Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1:27–30, 1994.

75.Dolin PJ, Johnson GJ. Solar ultraviolet radiation and ocular disease: A review of the epidemiological and experimental evidence. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1:155–164, 1994.

76.Schwartz LH, Ferrand R, Boelle PY, Maylin C, D’Hermies F, Virmont J. Lack of correlation between the location of choroidal melanoma and ultraviolet-radiation dose distribution. Radiat Res 147:451–456, 1997.

77.Li W, Judge H, Gragoudas ES, Seddon JM, Egan KM. Patterns of tumor initiaition in choroidal melanoma. Cancer Res 60:3757–3760, 2000.

78.Rosen ES. Filtration of non-ionizing radiation by the ocular media. In: Cronly-Dixon J, Rosen ES, Marshall J, eds. Hazards of light: Myths and realities on the eye and skin. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986, p 145.

79.Lerman S. Sunlight and intraocular melanoma. N Engl J Med 314:712–713, 1986.

80.Horn EP, Hartge P, Shields JA, Tucker MA. Sunlight and risk of uveal melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1476–1478, 1994.

81.Pane AR, Hirst W. Ultraviolet light exposure as a risk factor for ocular melanoma in Queensland, Australia. Ophthalm Epidemiol 7:159–167, 2000.

82.Holly EA, Aston DA, Ahn DK, Smith AH. Intraocular melanoma linked to occupations and chemical exposures. Epidemiology 7:55–61, 1996.

83.Guenel P, Laforest L, Cyr D, et al. Occupational risk factors, ultraviolet radiation, and ocular melanoma: a case-control study in France. Cancer Cause Control 12:451–459, 2001.

84.Albert DM, Puliafito CA, Fulton AB, Robinson NL, Zakov ZN, Dryja TP, Smith AB, Egan E, Leffingwell SS. Increased incidence of choroidal malignant melanoma occurring in a single population of chemical workers. Am J Ophthalmol 89:323–337, 1980.

85.Ajani UA, Seddon JM, Hsieh CC, Egan KM, Albert DM, Gragoudas ES. Occupation and risk of uveal melanoma. Cancer 70:2891–2900, 1992.

86.Ganley JP, Fontenot K. Epidemiologic study of time and space clustering of 4 cases of choroidal malignant melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:537–541, 1997.

87.Lutz J-M, Cree IA, Foss AJ. Risk factors for intraocular melanoma and occupational exposure. Br J Ophthlamol 83:1190–1193, 1999.

88.Stang N, Anastassiou G, Ahrens W, et al. The possible role of radiofrequency radiation in the development of uveal melanoma. Epidemiology 12:7–12, 2001.

89.Inskip PD. Frequent radiation exposures and frequency-dependent effects: The eyes have it. Epidemiology 12:1–4, 2001.

90.Johansen C, Boice JD Jr., McLaughlin JK, Christensen HC, Olsen JH. Mobile phones and malignant melanoma of the eye. Br J Cancer 86:348–349, 2002.

91.Bullimore MA. Are cell phones bad for your health? Optom Vis Sci 78:129, 2001.

92.Damato B. Detection of uveal melanoma by optometrists in the United Kingdom. Ophthalm Physiol Optom 21:268–271, 2001.

93.Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. Design and methods of a clinical trial for a rare condition: The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. COMS Report No. 3. Control Clin Trials 14:326–391, 1993.

4

Epidemiology of Retinoblastoma

JAMES J. AUGSBURGER

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, The University Hospital, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, and Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.

I.OVERVIEW

This chapter contains information concerning (1) the frequency of retinoblastoma in the general population, (2) the demographics of retinoblastoma, (3) currently recognized risk factors for the disease, and (4) important extraophthalmic lesions and disorders associated with retinoblastoma.

II.FREQUENCY OF RETINOBLASTOMA

A.Incidence of Retinoblastoma

Incidence is an expression of the number of persons in a defined population who develop a disease or condition over a specified time interval. By definition, none of the persons in the population has the disease or condition of interest at the start of the interval. All of these unaffected persons are considered to be at risk for development of the disease or condition. The width of the evaluation interval may be quite short (e.g., hours, days or weeks, depending on the disease or condition) or quite long (e.g., months to years).

Incidence of a disease or condition is based on the number of new cases diagnosed within the specified interval. Diagnosis of a disease or condition does not occur at its onset but at some time after it has reached a detectable extent and become symptomatic. The age of a patient at initial diagnosis of a disease or condition is a function of the relative promptness versus lateness of patient

47

48

Augsburger

presentation to his or her health care system and the quality and intensity of the health care services that are available in that system. In countries with a welldeveloped health care system and reasonably good patient access to that system, patients with a particular disease or condition are likely to be diagnosed on average at a less advanced stage of their disease. In contrast, in countries that have a poorly developed health care system and limited patient access to that system, patients tend to seek health care services later on average following recognition of symptoms and are likely to have more advanced disease on average at the time of diagnosis [1].

Multiple estimates of the incidence of retinoblastoma in various populations and countries have been published [2–19]. These reports differ greatly in the quality of the data on which the estimates are based and the width of the age intervals studied. Relatively few publications include both high-quality data and year-by-year estimates of retinoblastoma incidence from birth to age 15 years or older. The curves shown in Figure 1 are estimates of the year-by-year incidence of retinoblastoma from birth to 15 years in two very different populations. The solid curve is based on data from the United States of America [15]. It is a progressively decreasing function with a relatively steep slope during the first 2 years, a steadily lessening slope over the next 4 years, and an almost flat slope that approaches zero thereafter. In contrast, the dashed curve in Figure 1 is a hypothetical annual incidence curve for a country with a poorly developed health care system, limited patient access to that system, or both. In such a country, a higher percentage of detectable cases will remain undiagnosed during any given year than would be undiagnosed in the United States. This relative delay in diagnosis will lead to a lower estimated incidence for year 1 compared with that for the United States, an increasing incidence during year 2 compared with the decreasing incidence in the United States, and a displacement of the descending limb of the dashed curve to the right of the annual incidence curve of the United States.

Figure 1 Annual incidence curves for retinoblastoma from birth to age 15 years. Solid line curve is based on data from the United States, while dashed line curve is hypothetical but approximates annual incidence values one would encounter in a third-world country. Relative shapes of these curves are discussed in text.