Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.32 Mб
Скачать

Mouse Models of Retinoblastoma

479

in the first 3 weeks of life. Of the mice that survive to adulthood, the majority develop intermediate lobe tumors like the Rbþ/ mice; no additional tumor types are observed. The Rbþ/ :p107 / mice do develop multiple focal retinal lesions characterized as retinal dysplasias or degeneration of the photoreceptor cell layer, but retinoblastomas are not observed [60]. These studies demonstrate that there is functional overlap between p107 and pRb in several tissues of the developing and adult mouse, including the retina, but Rb heterozygous mutants nevertheless fail to develop retinoblastoma even in the complete absence of p107.

Because retinal development could not be assessed in the Rb / :p107 / mice due to embryonic lethality, chimeric mice have been generated with ES cells that are deficient in both Rb and p107 (Rb / :p107 / ) in a wild-type background [61]. In contrast to each of the previous knockout approaches described, Rb / :p107 / chimeric mice develop retinoblastomas, and lesions can be observed as early as day E17.5. Although these tumors are often located between the photoreceptor cell layer and the RPE, they express markers consistent with amacrine rather than photoreceptor cell differentiation. Rb / :p107 / retinoblasts expressing IRBP are detectable at day E17.5 but are completely absent by postnatal day 15, indicating that Rb / :p107 / retinoblasts committed to photoreceptor cell differentiation are eliminated during this developmental window. This cell loss is not p53-dependent, since the same fate is also observed when chimeras are generated with Rb / :p107 / ES cells also expressing a dominantnegative p53 gene under the control of the IRBP promoter [61]. Thus, simultaneous inactivation of both Rb and p107 strongly predisposes mice to the development of retinoblastomas of amacrine cell origin, but even the additional inactivation of p53 does not contribute to tumorigenesis of photoreceptor precursors.

D.Conditional Rb Knockout Mice

One additional approach that has been employed to address the effect of Rb inactivation in the mouse retina is the creation of cell type–specific Rb knockout mice using the Cre/loxP system. Conditional Rb knockout mice with two loxP sites flanking exon 19 (RbF19) were generated and interbred to IRBP-Cre transgenic mice, to create mice in which the Rb gene is inactivated only in IRBP-expressing cell types [62]. As noted above, the IRBP gene is expressed both in photoreceptor cells and the

pineal gland, beginning at approximately day E12 [33]. As expected from the results of the previous studies, the IRBP-Cre:RbF19/F19 mice display completely normal

retinal development and fail to develop either retinoblastomas or pinealomas, despite the presence of large numbers of Rb-deficient cells in these cell types. Rather, like the Rb heterozygous knockout mice, they develop pituitary tumors, although in this case the tumors are of both intermediate and anterior lobe origin [62]. The development of pituitary tumors in this model is particularly surprising, since Cre is not expected to be expressed in this cell type. However, the pituitary tumor cells

show exon 19 deletion of the Rb gene, indicating that Cre recombinase must be ectopically expressed in the pituitary of the IRBP-Cre mice. The IRBP-Cre:RbF19/F19 mice were also bred to p107 / mice to generate IRBP-Cre:RbF19/F19:p107 /

mice, and these mice also displayed normal retinal development. Although this might seem surprising in light of the fact that Rb / :p107 / chimeras develop retinoblastomas, it should be recalled that the Rb / :p107 / cells gave rise

480

Windle and Albert

only to tumors of amacrine cell origin and not photoreceptor origin in the chimeras,

while Rb inactivation in this model is restricted to photoreceptor cell precursors. Finally, IRBP-Cre:RbF19/F19 mice were also bred to p53 knockout mice to generate both IRBP-Cre:RbF19/F19:p53þ/ and IRBP-Cre:RbF19/F19:p53 / mice, and a small number of IRBP-Cre:RbF19/F19:p107þ/ :p53 / and IRBPCre:RbF19/F19:p107 / :p53 / mice were also generated. Remarkably, none of

these mice developed retinoblastoma; rather, they displayed accelerated pineal and pituitary tumorigenesis [62]. Thus, it must be concluded that inactivation of Rb in the mouse is insufficient to induce tumors of photoreceptor origin, and neither p107 nor p53 inactivation can cooperate with Rb loss to induce tumors of this cell type.

E.Implications from the Rb Knockout Mice

An obvious question arises from these studies: Why does germline Rb mutation cause retinoblastoma in humans but pituitary tumors in mice? The intermediate lobe of the pituitary gland is present in only vestigial form in humans, which could account for the failure of patients with germline Rb mutations to develop tumors arising in this cell type. However, it is less clear why Rb heterozygous mice fail to develop retinoblastomas [63–66]. One possibility is that somatic loss of the remaining normal Rb allele (or acquisition of other required mutations) in developing retinoblasts has a much lower probability of occurring in mice, since they presumably have a significantly smaller population of susceptible cells and a much shorter developmental time frame during which this event can occur. The fact that Rb / cells in chimeric mice fail to form retinoblastomas argues against this explanation if loss of the second Rb allele is the only rate-limiting step in retinoblastoma development. However, if additional genetic events are required, then the number of target cells and timing of susceptibility may still be contributing factors. This leads to a second possibility, which is that retinoblasts of mice and humans may differ subtly in the mechanisms controling cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis, such that mouse retinoblasts have additional genetic safeguards against oncogenic transformation that are lacking in human retinoblasts. For example, the fact that Rb / :p107 / cells but not Rb / cells can give rise to retinal tumors in mouse chimeras suggests a degree of redundancy between pRb and p107 in mice, such that functional p107 can protect against transformation of Rbdeficient retinoblasts. In contrast, there is no evidence for mutation of the p107 gene in human retinoblastoma [67]. It should be noted, however, that loss of both pRb and p107 function is still not sufficient to transform mouse retinoblasts, since not all Rb / :p107 / chimeric retinas develop retinoblastomas. It seems likely that an additional mutational event required for full transformation would be one that suppresses apoptosis, since the normal fate of Rb-deficient cells in the developing retina and in many other cell types is apoptosis. Although the p53 gene might seem to be an obvious candidate, there is little evidence from the mouse models that p53 mutation contributes significantly to retinoblastoma development. It has similarly been suggested that the development of retinoblastoma in humans requires not only loss of both Rb alleles but also at least one other genetic event, which could potentially alter the apoptotic susceptibility of the tumor cells (see this volume, Chapters 7 and 10). Therefore, identification of additional mutations that contribute

Mouse Models of Retinoblastoma

481

to retinoblastoma in the mouse may have direct implications for a better molecular understanding of human retinoblastoma.

V.TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODELS OF RETINOBLASTOMA IN THERAPEUTIC STUDIES

In addition to their applications in the study of the molecular genetics of cancer, genetically engineered mouse models of cancer are increasingly being used for the in vivo evalution of novel therapeutic approaches. The LHbeta-Tag mice in particular have been extensively used for evaluating a wide range of therapeutic approaches for the treatment of retinoblastoma, including local delivery of standard chemotherapeutic agents, external-beam radiation, a variety of combined modality approaches, and several novel anticancer agents.

A.Chemotherapeutic Agents

Chemotherapy is the most widely used modality for the treatment of invasive and metastatic retinoblastoma and is also an important component in the primary treatment of intraocular tumors [68,69]. However, systemic administration of cytotoxic agents at the doses required to achieve a sufficient intraocular drug concentration for effective tumor control is often associated with significant toxicity. Local delivery of carboplatin directly to the eye, either by intravitreal or subconjunctival injection, has therefore been explored in the LHbeta-Tag mice [70,71]. These studies demonstrated effective tumor growth inhibition in a dosedependent manner, but with a relatively narrow therapeutic window and dosedependent retinal toxicity. Local carboplatin administration has also been evaluated in combination with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or cryotherapy. Although no benefit was gained with the addition of cryotherapy in this model [72], significant enhancement of tumor control was achieved by the addition of radiation therapy [73].

B.External Beam Radiation Therapy

In addition to its combination with carboplatin, EBRT has been explored as a single modality and in combination with hyperthermia in the LHbeta-Tag transgenic mice. In a study evaluating dose and schedule of EBRT administration, hyperfractionated EBRT (administered twice daily) was compared to standard daily EBRT and was found to significantly increase tumor control, allowing for a reduction in the total radiation delivered dose [73]. EBRT was also evaluated in combination with ferromagnetic hyperthermia in this model. Significant synergy was observed with this combination, suggesting that hyperthermia may reduce the total radiation dose necessary for tumor control [74].

C.Vitamin D Analogues

The presence of calcification as a consistent feature of retinoblastoma has led to the suggestion that vitamin D analogues may have activity as chemotherapeutic agents

482

Windle and Albert

in this tumor type. Systemic administration of vitamin D3 to LHbeta-Tag mice inhibited the growth and local extension of tumors in a dose-dependent manner [75] and was further shown to inhibit tumor angiogenesis in this model [76]. However, vitamin D3 treatment was associated with significant toxicity, including hypercalcemia, weight loss, and death [75]. A number of vitamin D analogues have been developed in recent years, several of which appear to have greater antitumor activity with reduced toxicity [77]. One such analogue, 1,25-dihydroxy-16-ene-23-yne- vitamin D3, has also been evaluated in the LHbeta-Tag mice, and this compound showed comparable antitumor activity with significantly reduced systemic toxicity [78,79] compared to vitamin D3. The evaluation of novel vitamin D analogs in LHbeta-Tag transgenic mice is described in greater detail in Chapter 14.

D.Attenuated Herpes Simplex Virus

A number of strategies are currently being developed to employ cytolytic viruses as anticancer agents [80]. Of particular interest are naturally occurring or experimentally modified viruses that retain their ability lyse rapidly growing cells, including tumor cells, but are attenuated in their ability to replicate in normal cells. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) has a natural tropism for neuronal cells, and several attenuated mutant viruses have been characterized, making HSV an attractive virus for the treatment of neuronal malignancies [81]. One such HSV mutant, RE6, was evaluated in the LHbeta-Tag mouse model and was shown to significantly reduce tumor growth following intravitreal injection, although complete tumor control was not obtained [82].

VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS

The development of methodologies for introducing defined genetic alterations into the mouse genome have allowed for the creation of a number of mouse models of retinoblastoma that, like human retinoblastoma, involve loss of pRb function and to varying degrees resemble the human tumor histologically and ultrastructurally. It is somewhat ironic that the majority of these models are transgenic mouse lines that express dominantly acting oncogenes (SV40 T antigen or HPV E7), rather than knockout mice in which the Rb gene has been inactivated, since the latter approach would be expected to yield more genetically accurate models of human tumor types originating from loss of tumor suppressor genes. Although none of the approaches that have been employed for inactivating the Rb gene in the mouse have yielded mouse models of retinoblastoma (with the exception of the Rb / :p107 / chimeras), these experiments have raised important questions relating to the molecular genetics of retinoblastoma that are likely to contribute to a better understanding of the human disease. On the other hand, the transgenic mouse models of retinoblastoma have been particularly useful for the evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies, many of which have significant clinical potential, and it is hoped that these studies will lead to improved treatment strategies for retinoblastoma.

Mouse Models of Retinoblastoma

483

REFERENCES

1.Syed NA, Nork TM, Poulsen GL, Riis RC, George C, Albert DM. Retinoblastoma in a dog. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115:758–763.

2.Sabet SJ, Darjatmoko SR, Lindstrom MJ, Albert DM. Antineoplastic effect and toxicity of 1,25-dihydroxy-16-ene-23-yne-vitamin D3 in athymic mice with Y-79 human retinoblastoma tumors. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117:365–370.

3.Gallie BL, Albert DM, Wong JJ, Buyukmihci N, Pullafito CA. Heterotransplantation of retinoblastoma into the athymic ‘‘nude’’ mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16:256–259.

4.del Cerro M, Seigel GM, Lazar E, Grover D, del Cerro C, Brooks DH, DiLoreto DJ, Chader G. Transplantation of Y79 cells into rat eyes: an in vivo model of human retinoblastomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34:3336–3346.

5.Chevez-Barrios P, Hurwitz MY, Louie K, Marcus KT, Holcombe VN, Schafer P, Aguilar-Cordova CE, Hurwitz RL. Metastatic and nonmetastatic models of retinoblastoma. Am J Pathol 2000; 157:1405–1412.

6.Klausner R. Studying cancer in the mouse. Oncogene 1999; 18:5249–5252.

7.Kobayashi S, Mukai N. Retinoblastoma-like tumors induced in rats by human adenovirus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1973; 12:853–855.

8.Mukai N, Kalter SS, Cummins LB, Matthews VA, Nishida T, Nakajima T. Retinal tumor induced in the baboon by human adenovirus 12. Science 1980; 210:1023–1025.

9.Hogan B, Beddington R, Costantini F, Lacy E. Manipulating the mouse embryo: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1994.

10.Wassarman PM, DePamphilis ML. Guide to techniques in mouse development. In: Abelson JN, Simon MI, eds. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 225. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1993.

11.Schwenk F, Kuhn R, Angrand PO, Rajewsky K, Stewart AF. Temporally and spatially regulated somatic mutagenesis in mice. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26:1427–1432.

12.Lewandowski M. Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:743–755.

13.Robertson EJ. Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells: A practical approach. In: Rickwood D, Hames BD, eds. Practical Approach Series. Oxford, UK: IRL Press, 1987.

14.Sauer B. Inducible gene targeting in mice using the Cre/lox system. Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 1998; 14:381–392.

15.Windle JJ, Albert DM, O’Brien JM, Marcus DM, Disteche CM, Bernards R, Mellon PL. Retinoblastoma in transgenic mice. Nature 1990; 343:665–669.

16.DeCaprio JA, Ludlow JW, Figge J, Shew J-Y, Huang C-M, Lee W-H, Marsilio E, Paucha E, Livingston DM. SV40 large tumor antigen forms a specific complex with the product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene. Cell 1988; 54:275–283.

17.Lane DP, Crawford LV. T antigen is bound to a host protein in SV40-transformed cells. Nature 1979; 278:261–263.

18.Linzer DIH, Levine AJ. Characterization of a 54 K dalton cellular SV40 tumor antigen present in SV40-transformed cells and uninfected embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell 1979; 17:43–52.

19.Alarid ET, Windle JJ, Whyte DB, Mellon PL. Immortalization of pituitary cells at discrete stages of development by directed oncogenesis in transgenic mice. Development 1996; 122:3319–3329.

20.Kivela T, Virtanen I, Marcus DM, O’Brien JM, Carpenter JL, Brauner E, Tarkkanen A, Albert DM. Neuronal and glial properties of a murine transgenic retinoblastoma model. Am J Pathol 1991; 138:1135–1148.

484

Windle and Albert

21.Bogenmann E, Lochrie MA, Simon MI. Cone cell-specific genes expressed in retinoblastoma. Science 1988; 240:76–78.

22.Vrabec T, Arbizo V, Adamus G, McDowell JH, Hargrave PA, Donoso LA. Rod cell– specific antigens in retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107:1061–1063.

23.Hurwitz RL, Bogenmann E, Font RL, Halcombe V, Clark D. Expression of the functional cone phototransduction cascade in retinoblastoma. J Clin Invest 1990; 85:1872–1878.

24.Gonzalez-Fernandez F, Lopes MB, Garcia-Fernandez JM, Foster RG, De Grip WJ, Rosemberg S, Newman SA, VandenBerg SR. Expression of developmentally defined retinal phenotypes in the histogenesis of retinoblastoma. Am J Pathol 1992; 141:363– 375.

25.Nork TM, Schwartz TL, Doshi HM, Millecchia LL. Retinoblastoma—Cell of origin Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113:791–802.

26.Tsuji M, Goto M, Uehara F, Kaneko A, Sawai J, Yonezawa S, Ohba N. Photoreceptor cell differentiation in retinoblastoma demonstrated by a new immunohistochemical marker mucin-like glycoprotein associated with photoreceptor cells (MLGAPC). Histopathology 2002; 40:180–186.

27.Marcus DM, Carpenter JL, O’Brien JM, Kivela T, Brauner E, Tarkkanen A, Virtanen I, Albert DM. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the midbrain in a murine model of retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:293–301.

28.Jakobiec FA, Tso MOM, Zimmerman LE, Danis P. Retinoblastoma and intracranial malignancy. Cancer 1977; 39:2048–2058.

29.Bader JL, Miller RW, Meadows AT, Zimmerman LE, Champion LAA, Voute PA. Trilateral retinoblastoma. Lancet 1980; 2:582–583.

30.Brownstein S, de Chadarevian JP, Little JM. Trilateral retinoblastoma. Report of two cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102:257–262.

31.Bullitt E, Crain BJ. Retinoblastoma as a possible primary intracranial tumor. Neurosurgery 1981:706–709.

32.Pesin SR, Shields JA. Seven cases of trilateral retinoblastoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107:121–126.

33.Liou GI, Wang M, Matragoon S. Timing of interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) gene expression and hypomethylation in developing mouse retina. Dev Biol 1994; 161:345–356.

34.Al-Ubaidi MR, Hollyfield JG, Overbeek PA, Baehr W. Photoreceptor degeneration induced by the expression of simian virus 40 large tumor antigen in the retina of transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:1194–1198.

35.al-Ubaidi MR, Mangini NJ, Quiambao AB, Myers KM, Abler AS, Chang C-J, Tso MOM, Butel JS, Hollyfield JG. Unscheduled DNA replication precedes apoptosis of photoreceptors expressing SV40 T antigen. Exp Eye Res 1997; 64:573–585.

36.Al-Ubaidi MR, Font RL, Quiambao AB, Keener MJ, Liou GI, Overbeek PA, Boeher W. Bilateral retinal and brain tumors in transgenic mice expressing simian virus 40 large T antigen under control of the human interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein promoter. J Cell Biol 1992; 119:1681–1687.

37.Howes KA, Lasudry JGH, Albert DM, Windle JJ. Photoreceptor cell tumors in transgenic mice. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35:342–351.

38.Howes KA, Ransom N, Papermaster DS, Lasudry JGH, Albert DM, Windle JJ. Apoptosis or retinoblastoma: Alternative fates of photoreceptors expressing the HPV-16 E7 gene in the presence or absence of p53. Genes Dev 1994; 8:1300–1310.

39.Dyson N, Howley PM, Munger K, Harlow E. The human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Science 1989; 243:934– 937.

Mouse Models of Retinoblastoma

485

40.Munger K, Werness BA, Dyson N, Phelps WC, Harlow E, Howley PM. Complex formation of human papillomavirus E7 proteins with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product. EMBO J. 1989; 8:4099–4105.

41.Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine AJ, Howley PM. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell 1990; 63:1129–1136.

42.Donehower LA, Harvey M, Slagle BL, McArthur MJ, Montgomery CAJ, Butel JS, Bradley A. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature 1992; 356:215–221.

43.Baetge EE, Behringer RR, Messing A, Brinster RL, Palmiter RD. Transgenic mice express the human phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase gene in adrenal medulla and retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:3648–3652.

44.Fung K-M, Chikaraishi DM, Suri C, Theuring F, Messing A, Albert DM, Lee VM-Y, Trojanowski JQ. Molecular phenotype of simian virus 40 large T antigen-induced primitive neuroectodermal tumors in four different lines of transgenic mice. Lab Invest 1994; 70:114–124.

45.Hammang JP, Behringer RR, Baetge EE, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL, Messing A. Oncogene expression in retinal horizontal cells of transgenic mice results in a cascade of neurodegeneration. Neuron 1993; 10:1197–1209.

46.Griep AE, Herber R, Jeon S, Lohse JK, Dubielzig RR, Lambert PF. Tumorigenicity by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 in transgenic mice correlates with alterations in epithelial cell growth and differentiation. J Virol 1993; 67:1373–1384.

47.Griep AE, Krawcek J, Lee D, Liem A, Albert DM, Carabeo R, Drinkwater N, McCall M, Sattler C, Lasudry JG, Lambert PF. Multiple genetic loci modify risk for retinoblastoma in transgenic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:2723–2732.

48.Van Dyke TA. Analysis of viral-host protein interactions and tumorigenesis in transgenic mice. Semin Cancer Biol 1994; 5:47–60.

49.Lee EY-HP, Chang C-Y, Hu N, Wang Y-CJ, Lai C-C, Herrup K, Lee W-H, Bradley A. Mice deficient for Rb are nonviable and show defects in neurogenesis and haematopoiesis. Nature 1992; 359:288–294.

50.Jacks T, Fazeli A, Schmitt EM, Bronson RT, Goodell MA, Weinberg RA. Effects of an Rb mutation in the mouse. Nature 1992; 359:295–300.

51.Clarke AR, Maandag ER, van Roon M, van der Lugt NMT, van der Valk M, Hooper ML, Berns A, te Riele H. Requirement for a functional Rb-1 gene in murine development. Nature 1992; 359:328–330.

52.Hu N, Gutsmann A, Herbert DC, Bradley A, Lee WH, Lee EY. Heterozygous Rb-1 delta 20/ þ mice are predisposed to tumors of the pituitary gland with a nearly complete penetrance. Oncogene 1994; 9:1021–1027.

53.Williams BO, Schmitt EM, Remington L, Bronson RT, Albert DM, Weinberg RA, Jacks T. Extensive contribution of Rb-deficient cells to adult chimeric mice with limited histopathological consequences. EMBO J 1994; 13:4251–4259.

54.Robanus-Maandag EC, van der valk M, Vlaar M, Feltkamp C, O’Brien J, van Roon M, van der Lugt N, Berns A, te Riele H. Developmental rescue of an embryonic-lethal mutation in the retinoblastoma gene in chimeric mice. EMBO J 1994; 13:4260–4268.

55.Harrison DJ, Hooper ML, Armstrong JF, Clarke AR. Effects of heterozygosity for the Rb-1t19neo allele in the mouse. Oncogene 1995; 10:1615–1620.

56.Morgenbesser SD, Williams BO, Jacks T, DePinho RA. p53-dependent apoptosis porduced by Rb-deficiency in the developing mouse lens. Nature 1994; 371:72–74.

57.Lee EY-HP, Hu N, Yuan SF, Cox LA, Bradley A, Lee W, Herrup K. Dual roles of the retinoblastoma protein in cell cycle regulation and neuron differentiation. Gene Dev 1994; 8:2008–2021.

486

Windle and Albert

58.Macleod KF, Hu Y, Jacks T. Loss of Rb activates both p53-dependent and independent cell death pathways in the developing mouse nervous system. EMBO J 1996; 15:6178– 6188.

59.Lipinski MM, Macleod KF, Williams BO, Mullaney TL, Crowley D, Jacks T. Cellautonomous and non-cell-autonomous functions of the Rb tumor suppressor in developing central nervous system. EMBO J 2001; 20:3401–3413.

60.Lee M-H, Williams BO, Mulligan G, Mukai S, Bronson RT, Dyson N, Harlow E, Jacks T. Targeted disruption of p107: Functional overlap between p107 and Rb Genes Dev 1996; 10:1621–1632.

61.Robanus-Maandag E, Dekker M, van der Valk M, Carrozza M-L, Jeanny J-C, Dannenberg J-H, Berns A, te Riele H. p107 is a suppressor of retinoblastoma development in pRb-deficient mice. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1599–1609.

62.Vooijs M, te Riele H, van der Valk M, Berns A. Tumor formation in mice with somatic inactivation of the retinoblastoma gene in interphotoreceptor retinol binding protein– expressing cells. Oncogene 2002; 21:4635–4645.

63.Harlow E. Retinoblastoma. For our eyes only. Nature 1992; 359:270–271.

64.Jacks T. Tumor suppressor gene mutations in mice. Annu Rev Genet 1996; 30:603–636.

65.Hooper ML. Tumour suppressor gene mutations in humans and mice: Parallels and contrasts. EMBO J 1998; 17:6783–6789.

66.Vooijs M, Berns A. Developmental defects and tumor predisposition in Rb mutant mice. Oncogene 1999; 18:5293–5303.

67.Mulligan G, Jacks T. The retinoblastoma gene family: Cousins with overlapping interests. Trends Genet 1998; 14:223–229.

68.Gallie BL, Budning A, DeBoer G, Thiessen JJ, Koren G, Verjee Z, Ling V, Chan HS. Chemotherapy with focal therapy can cure intraocular retinoblastoma without radiotherapy. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114:1321–1328.

69.Murphree AL, Villablanca JG, Deegan WF, 3rd, Sato JK, Malogolowkin M, Fisher A, Parker R, Reed E, Gomer CJ. Chemotherapy plus local treatment in the management of intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114:1348–1356.

70.Harbour JW, Murray TG, Hamasaki D, Cicciarelli N, Hernandez E, Smith B, Windle J, O’Brien JM. Local carboplatin therapy in transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37:1892–1898.

71.Hayden BH, Murray TG, Scott IU, Cicciarelli N, Hernandez E, Feuer W, Fulton, O’Brien JM. Subconjunctival carboplatin in retinoblastoma: Impact of tumor burden and dose schedule. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118:1549–1554.

72.Murray TG, Cicciarelli N, O’Brien JM, Hernandez E, Mueller RL, Smith BJ, Feuer W. Subconjunctival carboplatin therapy and cryotherapy in the treatment of transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115:1286–1290.

73.Hayden BC, Murray TG, Cicciarelli N, Scott IU, Alexandridou A, Hernandez E, Wu X, Markoe AM, Feuer W, Fulton L, O’Brien JM. Hyperfractionated external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of murine transgenic retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120:353–359.

74.Murray TG, O’Brien JM, Steeves RA, Smith BJ, Albert DM, Cicciarelli N, Markoe AM, Tompkins DT, Windle JJ. Radiation therapy and ferromagnetic hyperthermia in the treatment of murine transgenic retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114:1376–1381.

75.Albert DM, Marcus DM, Gallo JP, O’Brien JM. The antineoplastic effect of vitamin D in transgenic mice with retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33:2354–2364.

76.Shokravi MT, Marcus DM, Alroy J, Egan K, Saornil MA, Albert DM. Vitamin D inhibits angiogenesis in transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36:83–87.

77.van den Bemd GJ, Chang GT. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogs in cancer treatment. Curr Drug Targets 2002; 3:85–94.

Mouse Models of Retinoblastoma

487

78.Shternfeld IS, Lasudry JG, Chappell RJ, Darjatmoko SR, Albert DM. Antineoplastic effect of 1,25-dihydroxy-16-ene-23-yne-vitamin D3 analogue in transgenic mice with retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114:1396–1401.

79.Wilkerson CL, Darjatmoko SR, Lindstrom MJ, Albert DM. Toxicity and dose-response studies of 1,25-(OH)2–16-ene-23-yne vitamin D3 in transgenic mice. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4:2253–2256.

80.Ring CJ. Cytolytic viruses as potential anti-cancer agents. J Gen Virol 2002; 83:491–502.

81.Markert JM, Parker JN, Gillespie GY, Whitley RJ. Genetically engineered human herpes simplex virus in the treatment of brain tumours. Herpes 2001; 8:17–22.

82.Brandt CR, Imesch PD, Robinson NL, Syed NA, Untawale S, Darjatmoko SR, Chappell RJ, Heinzelman P, Albert DM. Treatment of spontaneously arising retinoblastoma tumors in transgenic mice with an attenuated herpes simplex virus mutant. Virology 1997; 229:283–291.