Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Neuro-Ophthalmology_Kidd, Newman, Biousse_2008

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
20.07 Mб
Скачать

8Hereditary Optic Neuropathies

NANCY J. NEWMAN

Leber’s Hereditary Optic

Neuropathy

Dominant Optic Atrophy

Optic Neuropathy in Other

Hereditary Diseases

Therapeutic Implications

References

Key Points

The hereditary optic neuropathies are a group of disorders in which optic nerve dysfunction figures solely or prominently and direct inheritance is clinically or genetically proven.

The most common hereditary optic neuropathies are autosomal dominant optic atrophy and maternally inherited Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy.

Other inherited neurologic and systemic syndromic disease will not uncommonly manifest optic neuropathy.

A selective vulnerability of the optic nerve to perturbations in mitochondrial function may underlie a final common pathway among these disorders.

The neurologist should be familiar with the clinical characteristics and diagnosis of the hereditary optic neuropathies.

The traditional classification of the hereditary optic neuropathies relies on the recognition of typical clinical characteristics and classic patterns of familial transmission, but genetic analysis now permits diagnosis of some of these disorders even in the absence of a family history or in the setting of unusual clinical presentations.1,2 As a result, the clinical phenotypes of each disease are broader, and it is easier to recognize unusual cases. Nearly all of the inherited optic neuropathies eventually have symmetric, bilateral, central visual loss. In many of these disorders, the papillomacular nerve fiber bundle is affected, with resultant central or cecocentral scotomas. Optic nerve damage is usually permanent and, in many diseases, progressive.

In classifying the hereditary optic neuropathies, it is important to exclude the primary retinal degenerations that may masquerade as primary optic neuropathies because of the common finding of optic disc pallor. Retinal findings may be subtle, especially among the cone dystrophies, in which optic nerve pallor may be an early finding.1 It is essential in these cases to enlist the aid of your ophthalmology colleagues. Retinal arterial attenuation and abnormal electroretinography should help distinguish these diseases from the primary optic neuropathies.

191

192

Neuro-Ophthalmology: Blue Books of Neurology

 

 

Additionally, it is also customary to distinguish those disorders in which optic neuropathies feature prominently, with or without associated neurologic and systemic findings, from those primarily neurologic and systemic multisystem diseases in which there may be optic nerve involvement (Table 8–1). Obviously, this distinction is not always clear. The neurologist will often be the first one to see these patients and recognize optic nerve dysfunction.

Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

The clinical characteristics of patients with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) have been known for almost 150 years.1 Since the late 1980s, LHON

TABLE 8–1 Inherited Optic Neuropathies

Primary hereditary optic neuropathies

Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy

Dominant optic atrophy

Congenital recessive optic atrophy

Sex-linked optic atrophy

Inherited optic neuropathy with other neurologic or systemic signs

Wolfram/DIDMOAD syndrome

Autosomal dominant progressive optic atrophy and deafness

Autosomal dominant progressive optic atrophy with progressive hearing loss and ataxia

Hereditary optic atrophy with progressive hearing loss and polyneuropathy

Opticocochleodentate degeneration

Sex-linked recessive optic atrophy, ataxia, deafness, tetraplegia, and areflexia

Opticoacoustic nerve atrophy with dementia

Dominant optic atrophy, deafness, ophthalmoplegia, and myopathy

PEHO syndrome

Behr’s syndrome

Optic neuropathy in other hereditary degenerative or developmental diseases

Hereditary ataxias

Friedreich’s ataxia

Spinocerebellar ataxias

Hereditary polyneuropathies

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Familial dysautonomia (Riley-Day)

Hereditary spastic paraplegias

Hereditary muscular dystrophies

Storage diseases and cerebral degenerations of childhood (see Table 8–2)

Mitochondrial diseases

Leigh syndrome

MELAS syndrome

MERFF syndrome

CPEO/KSS syndrome

CPEO, chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia; DIDMOAD, diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness; KSS, Kearns-Sayre syndrome; MELAS, mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes; MERRF, myoclonic epilepsy and ragged red fibers; PEHO, progressive encephalopathy with edema, hypsarrhythmia, and optic atrophy.

8 Hereditary Optic Neuropathies

193

has received notoriety as a maternally inherited disease linked to abnormalities in mitochondrial DNA.1–10 The actual prevalence and incidence of visual loss from this disorder worldwide remains unstudied, but among individuals in the northeast of England, there is a minimal prevalence of visual loss from LHON of 3.22 per 100,000 individuals and a prevalence for harboring a primary LHON-associated mtDNA mutation of 11.82 per 100,000 individuals.11 In Australia, the disease accounts for about 2% of legal blindness in individuals younger than 65 years and for about 11% of all patients with bilateral optic neuropathy of uncertain etiology.12

Men are affected with visual loss more often than women, with a male predominance of about 80% to 90% in most pedigrees.4,7–13 A minimum of 25% of men and 5% of women at risk for LHON experience visual loss.1,12,13

The onset of visual loss typically occurs between the ages of 15 and 35 years,

but otherwise classic LHON has been reported in many individuals both younger and older,4,6–8,13 with a range of age at onset from 2 to 80 years.

Visual loss typically begins painlessly and centrally in one eye. The second eye is usually affected weeks to months later. Reports of simultaneous onset are numerous and likely reflect both instances of true bilateral coincidence and those in which initial visual loss in the first eye went unrecognized. More than 97% of patients will have second eye involvement within 1 year.4,6 The duration of progression of visual loss in each eye also varies and may be difficult to document accurately. Usually, the course is acute or subacute, with deterioration of visual function stabilizing after months.4–8,13

Visual acuities at the point of maximum visual loss range from no light

perception to 20/20, with most patients deteriorating to acuities worse than 20/200.4,6,8,13 Color vision is affected severely, often early in the course, but

rarely before significant visual loss.8 Pupillary light responses may be relatively preserved when compared with the responses in patients with optic neuropa-

thies from other causes, although others have not confirmed this finding.1 Visual field defects are typically central or cecocentral4,8,13 (Fig. 8–1).

Figure 8–1 Goldmann visual fields of a patient with visual loss from Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy showing dense cecocentral defects (involving fixation and the physiologic blind spot), reflecting damage to the papillomacular retinal ganglion cell fibers in both eyes.

194

Neuro-Ophthalmology: Blue Books of Neurology

 

 

Figure 8–2 Funduscopic view of the right optic nerve of a patient acutely losing vision from Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Note the hyperemia of the optic nerve head, the tortuosity of the retinal vessels just temporal to the disc, and the blurring of the disc margins and mild elevation of the disc from “pseudoedema.”

Funduscopic abnormalities, especially during the acute phase of visual loss (Fig. 8–2), include hyperemia of the optic nerve head and dilation and tortuosity of vessels and, less commonly, retinal and disc hemorrhages, macular edema, exudates, and retinal striations.1 A triad of signs has been proposed as pathognomonic for LHON: circumpapillary telangiectatic microangiopathy, swelling of the nerve fiber layer around the disc (pseudoedema), and absence of leakage from the disc or papillary region on fluorescein angiography (distinguishing the LHON nerve head from truly edematous discs).14 These findings can be found not only in patients in the acute phase of visual loss but also in “presymptomatic” eyes, as well as in the eyes of asymptomatic maternal relatives.8 Indeed, having abnormalities of the peripapillary nerve fiber layer does not necessarily predict visual loss. Furthermore, some patients with LHON never exhibit the characteristic ophthalmoscopic appearance, even if examined at the time of acute visual loss.4,6,7 Hence, the “classic” LHON ophthalmoscopic appearance may be helpful in suggesting the diagnosis if recognized in patients or their maternal relatives, but its absence—even during the period of acute visual loss—does not exclude the diagnosis of LHON. As the disease progresses, the telangiectatic vessels disappear and the pseudoedema of the disc resolves. Perhaps because of the initial hyperemia, the optic discs of patients with LHON may not appear pale for some time. This feature, coupled with the relatively preserved pupillary responses and the lack of pain, has led to the misdiagnosis of nonorganic visual loss in some LHON patients. Eventually, however, optic atrophy with nerve fiber layer dropout most pronounced in the papillomacular bundle supervenes (Fig. 8–3). Nonglaucomatous cupping of the optic discs may also be seen in patients with symptomatic LHON.

In most patients with LHON, visual loss remains profound and permanent.

However, recovery of excellent central vision may occur years after visual deterioration.4,6,8,13,15 It may take the form of a gradual clearing of central vision or

be restricted to a few central degrees, resulting in a small island of vision within a large central scotoma.15 Recovery is usually bilateral but may be unilateral.

8 Hereditary Optic Neuropathies

195

Figure 8–3 Funduscopic view of the right (A) and left (B) optic nerves of a patient with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy who lost vision 6 months prior. Note the pallor of the discs, especially temporally, the latter indicating preferential damage to the papillomacular bundle.

Those patients whose vision improves most substantially appear to have a lower mean age at the time of initial visual loss.6,8 Recurrences of visual failure are extremely rare among those patients both with and without visual recovery.

In the majority of patients with LHON, visual dysfunction is the only significant manifestation of the disease. However, some pedigrees have members with associated cardiac conduction abnormalities, especially the pre-excitation syn-

dromes.1 Minor neurologic abnormalities have been reported in patients with LHON.13,16 Less commonly, pedigrees have been described in which multiple

maternal members demonstrate the clinical features of LHON in addition to more severe neurologic abnormalities, such as movement disorders, dystonia,

encephalopathic episodes, and brainstem syndromes.1 Disease clinically indistinguishable from multiple sclerosis may occur in families with LHON.6,16–18

It is possible that this association between LHON and multiple sclerosis is no greater than the prevalence of the two diseases but that an underlying LHON mutation may worsen the prognosis of optic neuritis in patients with multiple sclerosis.18 Ancillary tests, aside from genetic analysis, are generally of limited usefulness in the evaluation of LHON. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain are typically normal in patients with LHON.1,4

All pedigrees clinically designated as LHON have a maternal inheritance pattern.3,9,10,19–21 In maternal inheritance, all offspring of a woman carrying

the trait will inherit the trait, but only the females can pass the trait on to the subsequent generation. Although both the father and the mother contribute to the nuclear portion of the zygote, the mother’s egg is virtually the sole provider of the zygote’s cytoplasmic contents. Because the intracytoplasmic mitochondria are the only source of extranuclear DNA, maternal inheritance indicates transmission of the abnormal trait via the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Ironically,

196

Neuro-Ophthalmology: Blue Books of Neurology

 

 

the majority of proteins crucial to normal mitochondrial function are encoded on nuclear genes, manufactured in the cytoplasm, and transported into the mitochondria (Fig. 8–4). Hence a “mitochondrial disease” could conceivably result from genetic defects in either the nuclear or the mitochondrial genomes. Inheritance of mitochondrial diseases will be maternal if the genetic defect is an mtDNA point mutation or Mendelian if the genetic defect is on a nuclear gene involved in mitochondrial function.

Three point mutations in the mtDNA, the so-called primary LHON mutations, are believed to account for about 90% of cases of LHON worldwide.1,9,19 They

are located at mtDNA positions 11778 (69% of cases), 3460 (13% of cases), and 14484 (14% of cases). Several other mtDNA mutations may be “primary” but account individually for only a few pedigrees worldwide (Fig. 8–5). Screening for LHON in a patient with visual loss from optic neuropathy should begin with the three primary mutations.19 In those primary mutation-negative patients in whom suspicion remains high, testing for the other mtDNA mutations associated with LHON can be performed in specialized centers, especially for those mutations deemed likely causal in a few previous pedigrees. Alternatively, because

Nucleus

 

 

Chromosomes

DOA

 

3q

 

 

 

 

18q

LHON

DNA

4p

11778

14484

 

DIDMOAD

 

 

3460

 

?

 

mRNA

 

Mitochondrion

 

 

Ribosomes

Oxphos

mt DNA

 

 

 

mRNA

Protein

 

 

Figure 8–4 Diagram of a proposed common pathophysiology of the hereditary optic neuropathies through mitochondrial dysfunction. This schematic diagram of a cell shows how proteins coded for in the nucleus and in the mitochondrion both contribute to mitochondrial function. The bold arrows indicate where the genetic defects underlying dominant optic atrophy (DOA), Leber’s hereditary topic neuropathy (LHON), and Wolfram syndrome (DIDMOAD) may cause mitochondrial dysfunction and optic atrophy. mRNA, messenger RNA; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; oxphos, oxidative phosphorylation. (From Newman NJ: Hereditary optic neuropathies: From the mitochondria to the optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:517–523.)

8 Hereditary Optic Neuropathies

197

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15812

15257

 

 

 

3275*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14831*

 

 

3376*m

 

 

 

OH

 

 

 

14596*d

 

 

 

12s

PH

F

 

T

 

14568

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4136*

 

 

rRNA

 

D-loop region

Cyt b

14510*

 

3308

 

 

 

 

 

 

14498*

 

 

 

V

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14495*

4025*

 

 

 

 

 

^

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P

 

 

14482*

3505

 

 

 

 

0/16569

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14459*d

3733*

 

16s

 

 

PL

 

 

 

 

 

14325*

3734

 

rRNA

 

 

 

 

 

E

 

14279*

3700*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ND6

 

 

4171*

 

 

 

 

 

 

14484

 

 

 

 

3497

 

L

 

 

 

 

 

ND5

13730*

3394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13708

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3496

ND1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13637*

3547

 

3460

Primary

 

 

 

 

 

13528*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3472

I

Q

 

 

LHON

 

 

 

L

 

13051*

3398

 

 

mutations

 

 

 

 

13045*m

3316

M

 

 

 

 

11778

 

S

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12848*

3635*

ND2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H

 

4216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12811*

 

AN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4640*

 

OL

 

 

 

 

 

 

ND4

 

 

4917

 

W

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Y

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11696*

5244*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ND4L

11253*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R

10663*

 

 

 

 

 

S

 

 

 

 

ND3

 

 

 

 

COI

 

 

 

 

 

 

G

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COIII

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D COII

 

ATPase6

 

10237*

 

 

 

 

 

 

K

 

9804*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATPase8

 

9738*

 

 

 

 

 

7444*

 

 

 

9101*

9438*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9016*

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complex I genes

 

Complex III genes

 

Transfer RNA genes

 

 

 

 

 

 

(NADH

 

(ubiquinol:

 

 

 

 

dehydrogenase)

 

cytochrome c

 

 

 

 

 

 

oxidoreductase)

 

 

 

 

Complex IV genes

 

Complex V genes

 

Ribosomal RNA genes

 

 

 

 

 

 

(cytochrome c

 

(ATP synthase)

 

 

 

 

oxidase)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 8–5 Mitochondrial genome showing the point mutations associated with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). More than 90% of all cases of LHON are associated with the three primary mutations located inside the genome, and the other mutations are shown outside the genome. These other mutations vary markedly in their prevalence, degree of evolutionary conservation of the encoded amino acids altered, and frequency among controls. Mutations marked * may be primary, but they each account for only one or a few pedigrees worldwide. Mutations marked *d are primary mutations associated with LHON and dystonia. Mutations marked *m are primary mutations associated with LHON/MELAS overlap syndrome. (Modified from MITOMAP: A Human Mitochondrial Genome Database. http://www.mitomap.org, 2005. December 22, 2005.)

the majority of these other mtDNA mutations reside in genes encoding subunits of complex I, complete sequencing of complex I might also be considered. Finally, sequencing the entire mitochondrial genome is possible, although labor intensive. This should be performed only in those cases of high suspicion and interpreted only by those versed in the complexities of mitochondrial genetics.

198

Neuro-Ophthalmology: Blue Books of Neurology

 

 

Genetic analysis allows a broader view of what constitutes the clinical profile of LHON.1 Most striking is the number of patients without a family history of visual loss. Some of these singleton cases are women, some outside the typical age range for LHON, and some without the classic ophthalmoscopic appearance. Clearly, the diagnosis of LHON should be considered in any case of unexplained bilateral optic neuropathy, regardless of age of onset, gender, family history, or funduscopic appearance.

Many questions remain unanswered regarding the determinants of phenotypic expression in LHON. For instance, does the specific mtDNA mutation dictate particular clinical features? Although those pedigrees with LHON “plus” demonstrate that certain mtDNA mutations may result in specific disease patterns of Leber’s-like optic neuropathies with other neurologic abnormalities,1,9 few significant clinical differences have been demonstrated to date among those LHON patients positive for the 11778 mutation, those with other mtDNA mutations, and those as yet genetically unspecified. One major exception is the difference in spontaneous recovery rates among those patients with the 11778 mutation and those with the 14484 mutation. Among 136 patients with the 11778 mutation, only 5 (4%) reported spontaneous recovery,15 compared with 37% to 65% of 14484 patients.6,8 Furthermore, the ultimate visual acuities in patients with the 14484 mutation are significantly better than those with the 11778 and 3460 mutations.6

An mtDNA mutation will be present in all maternally related family members of patients with LHON, even though many will never become symptomatic. Hence, whereas the presence of an mtDNA mutation may be necessary for phenotypic expression, it may not be sufficient. Nuclear-encoded factors modifying mtDNA expression, mtDNA products, or mitochondrial metabolism may influence phenotypic expression of LHON. Although most studies have not been able to confirm X-linkage as an explanation of the male predominance of visual loss in LHON, the X-linkage hypothesis may still be viable.9 Environmental factors, both internal and external, may play a role. Systemic illnesses, nutritional deficiencies, medications, or toxins that stress or directly or indirectly inhibit mitochondrial metabolism have been suggested to initiate or increase phenotypic expression of the disease. Although some reports suggest a possible role for tobacco and excessive alcohol use as precipitants of visual loss,22 one large case-control study of sibships23 failed to confirm this. Other agents known to be toxic to the optic nerve, such as ethambutol, or to mitochondrial function, such as antiretroviral therapy, may have a heightened toxicity in patients with the LHON mutations and already compromised mitochondrial function.1

Theories on the pathogenesis of LHON must reconcile how multiple different mtDNA mutations located in different genes encoding different proteins result in an essentially identical clinical phenotype that is expressed only in the optic nerve, suddenly and bilaterally.10,19 Pathogenetic theories include reduction in ATP production and/or free-radical damage with resultant apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells. Selective involvement of the ganglion cell or its axon may be explained on a vascular, mechanical, or regional basis, with several studies suggesting a high degree of mitochondrial respiratory activity within the unmyelinated, prelaminar portion of the optic nerve.19 This portion of the visual system may be particularly vulnerable to mitochondrial dysfunction, especially abnormalities of complex I.24

8 Hereditary Optic Neuropathies

199

Dominant Optic Atrophy

Autosomal dominant optic atrophy (DOA), or Kjer’s disease, is believed to be the most common of the hereditary optic neuropathies, with an estimated disease prevalence of 1 in 50,000.25 The typical onset of visual loss is in the first or second decade of life, although most patients cannot identify a precise onset of reduced acuity.1,2 Indeed, optic atrophy is often discovered only as a consequence of examination of other affected family members, attesting to the usually imperceptible onset in childhood, often mild degree of visual dysfunction, and absence of acute or subacute progression.

Visual acuity is usually reduced to the same mild extent in both eyes, with more than 80% of patients retaining better than 20/200 vision, although there is considerable interfamilial and intrafamilial variation in acuities.26 In some patients, there is a mild, slow, insidious progression of visual dysfunction. The observation that some families have a marked decline in visual acuity with age, whereas others do not has important implications for counseling.26 Spontaneous recovery of vision is not a feature of this disorder. Although tritanopia was originally designated as the characteristic color vision defect in patients with DOA, subsequent studies suggest that a generalized dyschromatopsia, with both blue-yellow and red-green defects, is most common.1,26 Visual fields in patients with DOA characteristically show central, paracentral, or cecocentral scotomas. In patients with acuities of 20/50 or better, static perimetry is often necessary to identify the defects (Fig. 8–6). In one large study,26 66% of the visual field defects in 50 affected patients were predominantly in the superotemporal visual fields, mimicking the bitemporal visual field defects seen with lesions of the chiasm. The optic atrophy in patients with dominantly inherited optic neuro-

pathy may be subtle, temporal with a triangular excavation, or diffuse, involving the entire optic disc2,26 (Fig. 8–7).

Although there are dominantly inherited syndromes of optic atrophy associated with neurologic dysfunction, most of the patients with the syndrome of

Figure 8–6 Humphrey automated perimetry performed on a patient with visual loss from dominant optic atrophy. A, Visual field of the left eye. B, Visual field of the right eye. Note the bilateral cecocentral defects that appear to respect the vertical meridian, mimicking chiasmal damage.

200

Neuro-Ophthalmology: Blue Books of Neurology

 

 

A

Figure 8–7 Funduscopic view of the right (A) and left (B) optic nerves of a patient with dominant optic atrophy. Note the pallor and excavation of the discs, especially temporally, the latter indicating preferential damage to the papillomacular bundle.

autosomal-dominant optic atrophy have no additional neurologic deficits. However, sensorineural hearing loss is not uncommon and tends to cluster within families.1 The hearing loss may be severe and congenital, or subclinical, requiring audiology for detection. In most cases, it is unclear whether these pedigrees represent a phenotypic variant of DOA, a genetically distinct disorder, or a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders with a similar phenotype. In one remarkable family in which ophthalmoplegia and ptosis accompanied DOA and hearing loss,27 a chromosome 3 missense mutation was found, a mutation which in other pedigrees resulted solely in nonsyndromic optic atrophy.

DOA is likely to be a primary degeneration of central retinal ganglion cells but not the exclusive result of either parvocellular or magnocellular cell loss.26,28 Although a linkage study of one large DOA pedigree localized the gene responsible for DOA with the Kidd blood group antigen, subsequently localized to a region on the long arm of chromosome 18 (18q12.2–12.3),29 most of the pedigrees

with DOA have genetic homogeneity in their linkage to the telomeric portion of the long arm of chromosome 3 (3q28–29).1,25,28 Thirty percent to 90% of DOA

families have been found to harbor more than 90 different missense and nonsense mutations, deletions, and insertions in a gene within this region that has been designated the OPA1 gene.28 The product of the OPA1 gene is targeted to the mitochondria and appears to exert its function in mitochondrial biogenesis and stabilization of mitochondrial membrane integrity.28 Downregulation of the OPA1 leads to fragmentation of the mitochondrial network and dissipation of the mitochondrial membrane potential with cytochrome c release and caspasedependent apoptosis.30 Interestingly, linkage analysis of patients with normal tension glaucoma has shown an association with polymorphisms of the OPA1 gene.31 These findings, coupled with the typical expression of both DOA and LHON