- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Dedication
- •Message
- •About the Editors
- •List of Contributors
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Methodologic Issues
- •Review of Studies (Table 1)
- •Cohort Effects on Myopia
- •Risk Factors for Myopia
- •Near work
- •Education/Income
- •Outdoor activity
- •Race/Ethnicity
- •Nuclear cataract
- •Family aggregation/Genetics
- •Siblings
- •Parent-child
- •Other family members
- •Genetics
- •Comments
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Myopia in Epidemiologic Studies
- •Risk Factors for Myopia and Ocular Biometry
- •Family history of myopia
- •Near work
- •Outdoor activity
- •Stature
- •Birth parameters
- •Smoking history
- •Breastfeeding
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Aetiological Heterogeneity of Myopia
- •Clearly genetic forms of myopia
- •School or acquired myopia
- •Misunderstandings of Heritability and Twin Studies
- •But Heritability has Its Uses
- •Evidence for Genetic Associations of School Myopia
- •Evidence for the Impact of Environmental Factors on Myopia Phenotypes
- •Gene-Environment Interactions and Ethnicity
- •Gene-Environment Interactions and Parental Myopia
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Economic evaluations
- •Full vs partial evaluations
- •Economic evaluation of myopia
- •The Economic Cost of Myopia: A Burden-of-Disease Study
- •China
- •India
- •Europe
- •Singapore
- •Southeast Asia
- •Africa
- •South America
- •Bangladesh
- •ii. Proportion of myopes paying for correction
- •Uncorrected and undercorrected refractive error, spectacle coverage rate and reasons for spectacles nonwear
- •iii. Amount paid for myopic correction
- •Singapore
- •The burden of myopia
- •Further Directions for Economic Research
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Impact of Myopia in Adults
- •Overall Conclusion
- •Future Studies
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Pathological Myopia
- •Cataract
- •Glaucoma
- •Myopic Maculopathy
- •Myopic Retinopathy
- •Retinal Detachment
- •Optic Disc Abnormalities
- •References
- •Conclusion
- •Introduction
- •The Association Between Myopia and POAG
- •Information from epidemiological studies
- •Asian populations: Myopia and POAG
- •Myopia in other situations
- •Myopia and ocular hypertension
- •Myopia in angle closure
- •Myopia in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome (PDS)
- •Theories for a Link Between Myopia and POAG
- •Glaucoma Assessment in Myopic Eyes
- •Biometric differences
- •Axial length and CCT
- •Optic disc assessment in myopic eyes
- •Visual fields in myopic eyes
- •Imaging tests and variations with myopia
- •ONH susceptibility to damage
- •The Influence of Myopia on the Clinical Management of the Glaucoma Patient
- •Glaucoma progression and myopia
- •References
- •Posterior Staphyloma
- •Myopic Chorioretinal Atrophy
- •Lacquer Cracks
- •Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization
- •Myopic Foveoschisis
- •Myopic macular hole detachments
- •Lattice degeneration
- •Retinal tears and detachments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Electroretinography
- •Ganzfeld electroretinography
- •Multifocal electroretinography
- •Assessment of Retinal Function
- •Outer retinal (photoreceptor) function
- •Post-receptoral (bipolar cell) and retinal transmission function
- •Inner retinal function
- •Macular function in myopic retina
- •Effect of Long-Term Atropine Usage on Retinal Function
- •Macular Function Associates with Myopia Progression
- •Factors Associated with ERG Changes in Myopia
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Genomic Convergence Using Genomic Content
- •Pathway Analysis
- •Pathway analysis in cancer genomics
- •Pathway analysis in GWAS
- •Non-parametric approaches
- •Parametric approaches
- •P-values combining approaches
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Myopia
- •The Classical Twin Model
- •What is the classical twin model?
- •Historical perspective
- •Statistical approaches
- •Twins, Myopia and Heritability Studies
- •Heritability studies for myopia using twins
- •Limitations of using twins in heritability studies
- •Twins and Myopia — Other Studies
- •The Importance of Twin Registries
- •Concluding Comments
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Candidate Gene Selection Strategies for Myopia
- •Genes Associated With Myopia-Related Phenotypes
- •The HGF/cMET ligand-receptor axis
- •The collagen family of genes
- •Concluding Remarks
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Phenotypes for Myopia Genetic Studies
- •Study Design
- •Genotyping and Quality Controls
- •Population Structure
- •Association Tests
- •Correlated Phenotypes
- •Imputation and Meta-Analysis
- •Visualization Tools
- •Drawing Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Search for Error Signals
- •The blur hypothesis
- •Bidirectional lens-compensation
- •Recovery from ametropia vs. compensation for lenses
- •The complication of the emmetropization end-point
- •Optical aberrations as error signals
- •Other possible visual error signals
- •How Important is Having a Fovea?
- •Mechanisms of Emmetropization
- •Scleral similarities and differences between humans and chickens
- •Retinal signals
- •Glucagon-insulin
- •Retinoic acid
- •Dopamine
- •Acetylcholine
- •Choroidal signals
- •The Role of the Choroid in the Control of Ocular Growth
- •Diurnal rhythms and control of ocular growth
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Gross Scleral Anatomy
- •Structural organization of the sclera
- •Cellular content of the sclera
- •Mechanical properties of the sclera
- •Structural Changes to the Sclera in Myopia
- •Development of structural and ultrastructural scleral changes in myopia
- •Scleral pathology and staphyloma
- •Biochemical Changes in the Sclera of Myopic Eyes
- •Structural biochemistry of the sclera in myopia
- •Degradative processes in the sclera of myopic eyes
- •Cellular changes in the sclera in myopia
- •Biomechanical Changes in the Sclera of Myopic Eyes
- •Regulators of scleral myofibroblast differentiation
- •Myofibroblast-extracellular matrix interactions
- •Cellular and matrix contributions to altered scleral biomechanics and myopia
- •Scleral Changes in Myopia are Reversible
- •Eye growth regulation during recovery from induced myopia
- •Summary and Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Spatial Visual Performance and Optical Features of the Eye
- •Axial eye growth and development of refractive state
- •Lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth
- •Corneal radius of curvature
- •Schematic eye data
- •Techniques Currently Available for Myopia Studies in the Mouse, Both for Its Induction and Measurement
- •Devices to induce refractive errors
- •Techniques to measure the induced refractive errors and changes in eye growth
- •Refractive state
- •Corneal radius of curvature
- •Axial length measurements and ocular biometry
- •Measurements of the optical aberrations of the mouse eye
- •Behavioral measurement of grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in the mouse
- •Recent Studies on Myopia in the Mouse Model: Some Examples
- •Magnitudes of experimentally induced refractive errors in wild-type mice
- •Refractive development in mutant mice
- •Pharmacological studies to inhibit axial eye growth in mice
- •Image processing and regulation of retinal genes and proteins
- •Summary
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •A Brief Introduction to Comparative Genomics
- •Comparative Expression
- •Genes in Retina and Sclera in Animal Models of Myopia
- •ZENK (EGR-1)
- •Scleral Gene Expression in a Mouse Model of Myopia
- •RNA, Target cDNA and Microarray Chip Preparation
- •Microarray Data Analysis
- •Scleral Gene Expression in the Myopic Mouse
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Possible Mechanisms of Pharmacological Treatment
- •Efficacy Studies
- •Other Issues Related to Drugs
- •Potential Side Effects
- •The Future of Drug Treatment in Myopia
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Accommodation
- •Close work
- •Physical characteristics of the retinal image
- •Visual deprivation
- •Compensatory changes in refraction
- •Intensity and periodicity of light exposure
- •Spatial frequency
- •Light periodicity
- •Image clarity
- •Outdoor activity and retinal image blur
- •Light vergence and photon catch
- •Chromaticity
- •Therapeutic implications
- •References
- •Index
10 B.E.K. Klein
In summary, in adults of largely European background there appears to be a cohort effect on myopia.
Risk Factors for Myopia
Risk factors for myopia or myopic shifts in adults are given in Table 2. A description of these and other risk factors in children and in adults is given below.
Near work
Much of the information on the association of near work with myopia in children is inferred from estimated intensity of school work or reading. A study in Hong Kong examined fishing families and found an association between education and myopia.27 Hepsen and colleagues reported on greater frequency of progression of myopia in children from private schools as compared with apprentices in a skilled labor group.28 Saw and colleagues reported a significant association between the degree of myopia and the
Table 2. Selected Characteristics* Associated with Myopia in Adults
|
|
|
SES/ |
Near Work/ |
Nuclear |
|
Location/Study |
Age |
Gender |
Income |
Education |
Cataract |
Occupation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andhra Pradesh11 |
+ |
0 |
0 |
+ |
+ |
|
Blue Mountains18,80 |
+ |
|
|
|
+ |
|
Baltimore Eye Survey19 |
+ |
+ |
|
+ |
|
|
BDES15,36,56 |
+ |
+ |
0 |
+ |
+ |
0 |
VIP17 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
LALES20 |
+ |
+ |
|
|
+ |
|
Barbados16,37 |
+ |
+ |
|
** |
+ |
+ |
Tanjong Pagar33,34 |
Inf. |
Inf. |
+ |
+ |
|
+ |
Reykjavik81 |
+ |
0 |
|
|
+ |
|
Abbreviations: SES = socioeconomic status; BDES = Beaver Dam Eye Study; VIP = Visual Impairment Project; LALES = Los Angeles Latino Epidemiologic Study; Inf. = inferred.
*Direction not given as associations may vary by strength and direction between categories of some characteristic.
**Near work was associated but not education.
+ Association found.
0 Association evaluated but not found.
11 Epidemiology of Myopia
number of books read per week in a group of Singaporean school children.12 In a study of Los Angeles and Australian 6- and 12-year-olds, parents’ report of children’s near work activity was modestly associated with myopia.9
Recently, Rose and colleagues reported a marked difference in the prevalence of myopia between Australian and Chinese Singaporean 6- to 7-year-old school children. The prevalence in Australians was 3.3% and in Singaporeans, 29.1%, despite the fact that the Australians read more books per week and did more hours of homework per week.29 The possibility that recent increases in years of preschool instruction for Singaporean children may be related to the higher prevalence in these children.
Khader and colleagues found that myopic children were likely to spend more time reading and writing and using the computer than their nonmyopic school mates,30 but the analyses were not adjusted for age, which is likely to be an important confounder in these analyses. Rah and colleagues in a study of myopia in parents and children have found that there is an association between near work and myopia, but speculated that the actual strength of the association was probably imprecise because of the inaccuracy of measures of near work. They suggest that better methods of reporting near work activities are needed for future myopia research in children.31
A relationship between near work activity and myopic change in refractive error has been found in adults. Microscopists have been shown to have higher prevalence of myopia than the general population and higher prevalence of adult progression of myopia, but a comparison group was lacking in this report.32 Studies of other specific exposure groups, e.g. medical students,14 suggest that these persons have greater prevalence of myopia than other similarly aged groups. Wu et al. reported that adults who reported near work activities were more likely to be myopic as compared with others in the population.16 Few studies in adults have had careful, precise measures of near work and therefore it is yet to be established whether near work activity is the important exposure and not just a confounder of other important possible causes.
Education/Income
Education and income are considered together because it is usually not possible to separate the effects of these two exposures. The association of more myopic refractive error with level of educational achievement (and usually with income as well) in children and adults has been found in most
12 B.E.K. Klein
studies of refraction.9,12,15,18,33,34 It is thought that this reflects near work activities, although there is a dearth of studies that assess the relationship quantitatively and by specific activity as noted above. The education/ refraction association relation may reflect common genetic determinants of intelligence (or educational achievement) and refraction.35 It is noteworthy that education was not associated with change in refraction in two large epidemiologic studies of adults.36,37
Outdoor activity
Ip et al. reported a small effect of hours spent outdoors on refraction (more hyperopic) in children in the Sydney Myopia Study.9 This finding was extended by Rose and colleagues, who reported on refraction in a sample of 6- and 12-year-old school children in Sydney, Australia. They found an inverse association of total time outdoors with refraction after adjusting for near work, parental myopia, and ethnicity.38 Hours spent playing sports was inversely associated with myopia in a study of 1777 students aged 12to 17-years old in Amman, Jordan, but these data were not adjusted for age.39
Jones and colleagues reported that lower amounts of sports and outdoor activities increased the odds of children, with two myopic parents, becoming myopic.40 The chances of children with no myopic parents becoming myopic was the lowest in the children with the greatest amount of sports and outdoor activities. Higher levels of total time spent outdoors, rather than sports per se, were associated with less myopia after adjustment is made for near work, parental myopia, and ethnicity. Rose and colleagues reported that Australian 6- to 7-year-olds spent more hours in outdoor activities than Singaporean children of the same age, the latter having a higher prevalence of myopia.41 Jacobsen and colleagues reported an apparent protective effect of physical activity for development of myopia over a two-year interval in a group of medical students in Copenhagen.42
There is no data to suggest that physical activity or sports has any effect on refraction or change in refraction in adults.
Age
In childhood, increasing age is associated with increasing prevalence of myopia.43,44 In adults, increasing age is associated with a hyperopic shift36 unless cataract is present when there may then be increasing myopia.45,46 The age effect is further described in the section on “Review of Studies.”
