Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Myopia Animal Models to Clinical Trials_Beuerman, Saw, Tan_2009.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
3.4 Mб
Скачать

75 The Economics of Myopia

The Singapore study49 on myopic schooling teenagers found a conservative median annual cost of US$83. This is slightly higher but in the same magnitude as the USA estimate. This is probably because the Lim et al. study was on a prospective cohort of myopes measuring actual expenditures. In contrast, Vitale et al. used cost data based on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee schedules for 2000, and expenditure data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Also, the amount that a private individual is willing to pay is larger than the amount the government is willing to subsidize. The difference could be equated to the extra amount private individuals are willing to pay for other factors such as design and esthetics — it is possible to get a cheap pair of spectacles in Singapore for US$35.

The burden of myopia

Table 7 shows the number of myopes, approximately 900 million, around in the world who pay for vision correction. In the US, the annual cost is approximately $US50. Since the Singapore cost estimate is higher, we used the US cost data as a conservative estimate for the cost of myopia. However, the cost in US dollars in poorer countries like India would be lower than that in the USA, so we can use purchasing power parity to estimate the cost of myopia in these countries. A pair of spectacles in USA is the same as the cost of a pair of spectacles in Russia. In real life, it is not as simple as that, but it will suffice for an approximation for the global cost of myopia. Thus the global burden of myopia would be approximately $US50 x 900 million, or $US45 billion.

Further Directions for Economic Research

A major limitation in our analysis is the paucity of cost data from large regions of the world. This necessitated the extrapolation of cost data from the USA, rather than from Singapore, as the USA cost data were more conservative. Instead of just a burden of disease study, we could perform partial and full evaluations examining the benefits of treating myopia as well as the costs, and define possible alternatives of action. The benefits of reducing myopia would include reduction of diseases which myopes are at greater risk, e.g., cataract, glaucoma and retinal detachment, and their attendant direct and indirect costs. Alternative courses of action might include government programs for free sight tests and glasses.

 

 

 

 

Table 7.

Estimation of Number of Myopes with Optical Correction Globally

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

South

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parameters

China

India

Indonesia

Pakistan

Bangladesh

Others

Africa

USA

Mexico

Canada

Others

America

Europe

Australia

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Population,

1.32

1.15

0.23

0.17

0.15

1.01

 

0.92

0.30

0.11

0.03

0.09

0.38

0.73

0.03

 

billion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

3.88

 

 

 

0.92

 

 

 

0.53

 

0.38

0.73

0.03

6.47

population,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

billion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Myopia

0.29

0.21

0.26

0.18

0.20

0.20

 

0.10

0.27

0.18

0.27

0.27

0.21

0.27

0.07

 

prevalence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of myopes

0.38

0.16

0.06

0.03

0.03

0.2

 

0.09

0.08

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.08

0.2

0.002

1.44

Percentage

80%

33%

50%

33%

33%

50%

 

20%

95%

80%

90%

80%

80%

90%

85%

 

of myopes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

with

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

correction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of myopes

0.30

0.05

0.03

0.01

0.01

0.10

 

0.02

0.08

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.06

0.18

0.00

0.89

having

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

correction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frick .D.K and Lim .C.C.M 76

77 The Economics of Myopia

References

1.Drummond MF, Schulpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. (2005) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.

2.Castanon Holguin AM, Congdon N, Patel N, et al. (2006) Factors associated with spectacle-wear compliance in school-aged Mexican children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3): 925–928.

3.Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Huq DM, et al. (2004) Correction of refractive error in the adult population of Bangladesh: meeting the unmet need. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(2): 410–417.

4.Zeng Y, Keay L, He M, et al. (2009) A randomized, clinical trial evaluating ready-made and custom spectacles delivered via a school-based screening program in China. Ophthalmology 116(10): 1839–1845.

5.He M, Huang W, Li Y, et al. (2009) Refractive error and biometry in older Chinese adults: the Liwan Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(11): 5130–5136.

6.He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, et al. (2004) Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern china. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(3): 793–799.

7.Congdon N, Wang Y, Song Y, et al. (2008) Visual disability, visual function, and myopia among rural chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES) — report 1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(7): 2888–2894.

8.He M, Huang W, Zheng Y, et al. (2007) Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China. Ophthalmology 114(2): 374–382.

9.Xu L, Li J, Cui T, et al. (2005) Refractive error in urban and rural adult Chinese in Beijing. Ophthalmology 112(10): 1676–1683.

10.Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Ellwein LB, et al. (2002) Refractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(3): 623–631.

11.Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, et al. (2002) Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(3): 615–622.

12.Raju P, Ramesh SV, Arvind H, et al. (2004) Prevalence of refractive errors in a rural South Indian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(12): 4268–4272.

13.Kempen JH, Mitchell P, Lee KE, et al. (2004) The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol 122(4): 495–505.

14.Tan GJ, Ng YP, Lim YC, et al. (2000) Cross-sectional study of near-work and myopia in kindergarten children in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29(6): 740–744.

15.Quek TP, Chua CG, Chong CS, et al. (2004) Prevalence of refractive errors in teenage high school students in Singapore. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 24(1): 47–55.

78M.C.C. Lim and K.D. Frick

16.Wu HM, Seet B, Yap EP, et al. (2001) Does education explain ethnic differences in myopia prevalence? A population-based study of young adult males in Singapore. Optom Vis Sci 78(4): 234–239.

17.Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. (2000) Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(9): 2486–2494.

18.Goh PP, Abqariyah Y, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB (2005) Refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in Gombak District, Malaysia.

Ophthalmology 112(4): 678–685.

19.Saw SM, Gazzard G, Koh D, et al. (2002) Prevalence rates of refractive errors in Sumatra, Indonesia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(10): 3174–3180.

20.Naidoo KS, Raghunandan A, Mashige KP, et al. (2003) Refractive error and visual impairment in African children in South Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(9): 3764–3770.

21.Ntim-Amponsah CT, Ofosu-Amaah S. (2007) Prevalence of refractive error and other eye diseases in schoolchildren in the Greater Accra region of Ghana.

J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 44(5): 294–297.

22.Wedner SH, Ross DA, Todd J, et al. (2002) Myopia in secondary school students in Mwanza City, Tanzania: the need for a national screening programme. Br J Ophthalmol 86(11): 1200–1206.

23.Table 1: Annual Estimates of the Population by Five-Year Age Groups and Sex for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2006 (NC-EST2006-01). Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau; 2007.

24.Giordano L, Friedman DS, Repka MX, et al. (2009) Prevalence of refractive error among preschool children in an urban population: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 116(4): 739–746, 46 e1–4.

25.Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, et al. (2003) Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optom Vis Sci 80(3): 226–236.

26.Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, et al. (2008) Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol 126(8): 1111–1119.

27.Schellini SA, Durkin SR, Hoyama E, et al. (2009) Prevalence of refractive errors in a Brazilian population: the Botucatu eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 16(2): 90–97.

28.Tarczy-Hornoch K, Ying-Lai M, Varma R. (2006) Myopic refractive error in adult Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(5): 1845–1852.

29.Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, et al. (2004) Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh. Ophthalmology 111(6): 1150–1160.

30.Vitale S, Cotch MF, Sperduto RD. (2006) Prevalence of visual impairment in the United States. JAMA 295(18): 2158–2163.

79The Economics of Myopia

31.Munoz B, West SK, Rodriguez J, et al. (2002) Blindness, visual impairment and the problem of uncorrected refractive error in a Mexican-American population: Proyecto VER. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(3): 608–614.

32.Kuang TM, Tsai SY, Hsu WM, et al. (2007) Correctable visual impairment in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(3): 1032–1037.

33.Thiagalingam S, Cumming RG, Mitchell P. (2002) Factors associated with undercorrected refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 86(9): 1041–1045.

34.Varma R, Wang MY, Ying-Lai M, et al. (2008) The prevalence and risk indicators of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive need in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(12): 5264–5273.

35.Saw SM, Foster PJ, Gazzard G, et al. (2004) Undercorrected refractive error in Singaporean Chinese adults: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Ophthalmology 111(12): 2168–2174.

36.Rosman M, Wong TY, Tay WT, et al. (2009) Prevalence and risk factors of undercorrected refractive errors among Singaporean Malay adults: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(8): 3621–3628.

37.Dandona R, Dandona L, Kovai V, et al. (2002) Population-based study of spectacles use in southern India. Indian J Ophthalmol 50(2): 145–155.

38.Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. (2008) Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ 86(1): 63–70.

39.Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Raissi B, Mohammad K. (2006) Uncorrected refractive errors and spectacle utilisation rate in Tehran: the unmet need. Br J Ophthalmol 90(5): 534–537.

40.Wedner S, Masanja H, Bowman R, et al. (2008) Two strategies for correcting refractive errors in school students in Tanzania: randomised comparison, with implications for screening programmes. Br J Ophthalmol 92(1): 19–24.

41.Congdon N, Zheng M, Sharma A, et al. (2008) Prevalence and determinants of spectacle nonwear among rural Chinese secondary schoolchildren: The Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study Report 3. Arch Ophthalmol 126(12): 1717–1723.

42.Odedra N, Wedner SH, Shigongo ZS, et al. (2008) Barriers to spectacle use in Tanzanian secondary school students. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 15(6): 410–417.

43.Robaei D, Kifley A, Rose KA, Mitchell P. (2006) Refractive error and patterns of spectacle use in 12-year-old Australian children. Ophthalmology 113(9): 1567–1573.

44.Robaei D, Rose K, Kifley A, Mitchell P. (2005) Patterns of spectacle use in young Australian school children: findings from a population-based study.

J AAPOS 9(6): 579–583.

80M.C.C. Lim and K.D. Frick

45.Vision Research a national plan 1983–87: National Eye Advisory Council (US) 1983.

46.Javitt JC, Chiang YP. (1994) The socioeconomic aspects of laser refractive surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 112(12): 1526–1530.

47.Levit KR, Lazenby HC, Cowan CA, Letsch SW. (1991) National health expenditures, 1990. Health Care Fin Rev 13: 29–54.

48.Vitale S, Cotch MF, Sperduto R, Ellwein L. (2006) Costs of refractive correction of distance vision impairment in the United States, 1999–2002. Ophthalmology 113(12): 2163–2170.

49.Lim MC, Gazzard G, Sim EL, et al. (2009) Direct costs of myopia in Singapore. Eye 23(5): 1086–1089.

50.Berdeaux G, Alio JL, Martinez JM, et al. (2002) Socioeconomic aspects of laser in situ keratomileusis, eyeglasses, and contact lenses in mild to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 28(11): 1914–1923.

Section 2

Clinical Studies and

Pathologic Myopia

This page intentionally left blank