- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Dedication
- •Message
- •About the Editors
- •List of Contributors
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Methodologic Issues
- •Review of Studies (Table 1)
- •Cohort Effects on Myopia
- •Risk Factors for Myopia
- •Near work
- •Education/Income
- •Outdoor activity
- •Race/Ethnicity
- •Nuclear cataract
- •Family aggregation/Genetics
- •Siblings
- •Parent-child
- •Other family members
- •Genetics
- •Comments
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Myopia in Epidemiologic Studies
- •Risk Factors for Myopia and Ocular Biometry
- •Family history of myopia
- •Near work
- •Outdoor activity
- •Stature
- •Birth parameters
- •Smoking history
- •Breastfeeding
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Aetiological Heterogeneity of Myopia
- •Clearly genetic forms of myopia
- •School or acquired myopia
- •Misunderstandings of Heritability and Twin Studies
- •But Heritability has Its Uses
- •Evidence for Genetic Associations of School Myopia
- •Evidence for the Impact of Environmental Factors on Myopia Phenotypes
- •Gene-Environment Interactions and Ethnicity
- •Gene-Environment Interactions and Parental Myopia
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Economic evaluations
- •Full vs partial evaluations
- •Economic evaluation of myopia
- •The Economic Cost of Myopia: A Burden-of-Disease Study
- •China
- •India
- •Europe
- •Singapore
- •Southeast Asia
- •Africa
- •South America
- •Bangladesh
- •ii. Proportion of myopes paying for correction
- •Uncorrected and undercorrected refractive error, spectacle coverage rate and reasons for spectacles nonwear
- •iii. Amount paid for myopic correction
- •Singapore
- •The burden of myopia
- •Further Directions for Economic Research
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Impact of Myopia in Adults
- •Overall Conclusion
- •Future Studies
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Pathological Myopia
- •Cataract
- •Glaucoma
- •Myopic Maculopathy
- •Myopic Retinopathy
- •Retinal Detachment
- •Optic Disc Abnormalities
- •References
- •Conclusion
- •Introduction
- •The Association Between Myopia and POAG
- •Information from epidemiological studies
- •Asian populations: Myopia and POAG
- •Myopia in other situations
- •Myopia and ocular hypertension
- •Myopia in angle closure
- •Myopia in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome (PDS)
- •Theories for a Link Between Myopia and POAG
- •Glaucoma Assessment in Myopic Eyes
- •Biometric differences
- •Axial length and CCT
- •Optic disc assessment in myopic eyes
- •Visual fields in myopic eyes
- •Imaging tests and variations with myopia
- •ONH susceptibility to damage
- •The Influence of Myopia on the Clinical Management of the Glaucoma Patient
- •Glaucoma progression and myopia
- •References
- •Posterior Staphyloma
- •Myopic Chorioretinal Atrophy
- •Lacquer Cracks
- •Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization
- •Myopic Foveoschisis
- •Myopic macular hole detachments
- •Lattice degeneration
- •Retinal tears and detachments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Electroretinography
- •Ganzfeld electroretinography
- •Multifocal electroretinography
- •Assessment of Retinal Function
- •Outer retinal (photoreceptor) function
- •Post-receptoral (bipolar cell) and retinal transmission function
- •Inner retinal function
- •Macular function in myopic retina
- •Effect of Long-Term Atropine Usage on Retinal Function
- •Macular Function Associates with Myopia Progression
- •Factors Associated with ERG Changes in Myopia
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Genomic Convergence Using Genomic Content
- •Pathway Analysis
- •Pathway analysis in cancer genomics
- •Pathway analysis in GWAS
- •Non-parametric approaches
- •Parametric approaches
- •P-values combining approaches
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Myopia
- •The Classical Twin Model
- •What is the classical twin model?
- •Historical perspective
- •Statistical approaches
- •Twins, Myopia and Heritability Studies
- •Heritability studies for myopia using twins
- •Limitations of using twins in heritability studies
- •Twins and Myopia — Other Studies
- •The Importance of Twin Registries
- •Concluding Comments
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Candidate Gene Selection Strategies for Myopia
- •Genes Associated With Myopia-Related Phenotypes
- •The HGF/cMET ligand-receptor axis
- •The collagen family of genes
- •Concluding Remarks
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Phenotypes for Myopia Genetic Studies
- •Study Design
- •Genotyping and Quality Controls
- •Population Structure
- •Association Tests
- •Correlated Phenotypes
- •Imputation and Meta-Analysis
- •Visualization Tools
- •Drawing Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Search for Error Signals
- •The blur hypothesis
- •Bidirectional lens-compensation
- •Recovery from ametropia vs. compensation for lenses
- •The complication of the emmetropization end-point
- •Optical aberrations as error signals
- •Other possible visual error signals
- •How Important is Having a Fovea?
- •Mechanisms of Emmetropization
- •Scleral similarities and differences between humans and chickens
- •Retinal signals
- •Glucagon-insulin
- •Retinoic acid
- •Dopamine
- •Acetylcholine
- •Choroidal signals
- •The Role of the Choroid in the Control of Ocular Growth
- •Diurnal rhythms and control of ocular growth
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Gross Scleral Anatomy
- •Structural organization of the sclera
- •Cellular content of the sclera
- •Mechanical properties of the sclera
- •Structural Changes to the Sclera in Myopia
- •Development of structural and ultrastructural scleral changes in myopia
- •Scleral pathology and staphyloma
- •Biochemical Changes in the Sclera of Myopic Eyes
- •Structural biochemistry of the sclera in myopia
- •Degradative processes in the sclera of myopic eyes
- •Cellular changes in the sclera in myopia
- •Biomechanical Changes in the Sclera of Myopic Eyes
- •Regulators of scleral myofibroblast differentiation
- •Myofibroblast-extracellular matrix interactions
- •Cellular and matrix contributions to altered scleral biomechanics and myopia
- •Scleral Changes in Myopia are Reversible
- •Eye growth regulation during recovery from induced myopia
- •Summary and Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Spatial Visual Performance and Optical Features of the Eye
- •Axial eye growth and development of refractive state
- •Lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth
- •Corneal radius of curvature
- •Schematic eye data
- •Techniques Currently Available for Myopia Studies in the Mouse, Both for Its Induction and Measurement
- •Devices to induce refractive errors
- •Techniques to measure the induced refractive errors and changes in eye growth
- •Refractive state
- •Corneal radius of curvature
- •Axial length measurements and ocular biometry
- •Measurements of the optical aberrations of the mouse eye
- •Behavioral measurement of grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in the mouse
- •Recent Studies on Myopia in the Mouse Model: Some Examples
- •Magnitudes of experimentally induced refractive errors in wild-type mice
- •Refractive development in mutant mice
- •Pharmacological studies to inhibit axial eye growth in mice
- •Image processing and regulation of retinal genes and proteins
- •Summary
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •A Brief Introduction to Comparative Genomics
- •Comparative Expression
- •Genes in Retina and Sclera in Animal Models of Myopia
- •ZENK (EGR-1)
- •Scleral Gene Expression in a Mouse Model of Myopia
- •RNA, Target cDNA and Microarray Chip Preparation
- •Microarray Data Analysis
- •Scleral Gene Expression in the Myopic Mouse
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Possible Mechanisms of Pharmacological Treatment
- •Efficacy Studies
- •Other Issues Related to Drugs
- •Potential Side Effects
- •The Future of Drug Treatment in Myopia
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Accommodation
- •Close work
- •Physical characteristics of the retinal image
- •Visual deprivation
- •Compensatory changes in refraction
- •Intensity and periodicity of light exposure
- •Spatial frequency
- •Light periodicity
- •Image clarity
- •Outdoor activity and retinal image blur
- •Light vergence and photon catch
- •Chromaticity
- •Therapeutic implications
- •References
- •Index
40 W.C.J. Low, T.Y. Wong and S.-M. Saw
children (–1.6 D) was significantly less myopic than non-breastfed children (–2.1 D; p = 0.01).
Conclusion
Both genes and environments are known to play important roles in the onset and development of myopia. There is consensus that a family history of myopia is a major risk factor for myopia and ocular biometry and represents a surrogate for genetic or shared environmental factors. However, current evidence also suggests that environmental factors such as near work and outdoor activity are implicated in the development of myopia and longer AL.13–15,23,24,29 Near work is potentially modifiable but given the emphasis on academic excellence in Asian cultures, reducing the time spent on near work activity, particularly reading, may not be acceptable to the parents and is unlikely to be implemented. Other environmental factors for myopia remain controversial. Greater height is associated with longer AL but the relationship remains unclear with myopia. Similarly, birth weight is positively associated with AL but the association with spherical refraction is weak. Evidence suggests that exposure to smoking in pregnancy and childhood may protect against myopia in children. Breastfeeding appears to protect against myopia in Singapore children but this finding requires validation in other populations and ethnic groups.
Further studies should be conducted to determine the nature of the association of time spent outdoors, and other possible risk factors such as diet in longitudinal cohort studies that document the temporal sequence of events. The issue of an accurate and precise quantification of “near work activity” remains challenging and represents an area of in-depth study. Particularly, near work “parameters” such as posture while reading, frequency of close reading, breaks during reading and lighting conditions, are modifiable and need to be further evaluated. Portable instruments that record activity over a 24-hour period could document lighting levels, time spent on close work in an objective manner. Randomized clinical trials should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of time spent outdoors to protect for myopia. The relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors needs to be examined, and well-designed studies will be required to tease out the interactions of genes-environmental mechanisms in the development of myopia and changes in axial dimensions throughout life.53
41 Environmental Risk Factors for Myopia in Children
References
1.Kempen JH, et al. (2004) The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol 122(4): 495–505.
2.Lin LL, et al. (2004) Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33(1): 27–33.
3.Lam CS, Goldschmidt E, Edwards MH. (2004) Prevalence of myopia in local and international schools in Hong Kong. Optom Vis Sci 81(5): 317–322.
4.Wu HM, et al. (2001) Does education explain ethnic differences in myopia prevalence? A population-based study of young adult males in Singapore. Optom Vis Sci 78(4): 234–239.
5.Saw SM, et al. (2005) Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25(5): 381–391.
6.Javitt JC, Chiang YP. (1994) The socioeconomic aspects of laser refractive surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 112(12): 1526–1530.
7.Lim MC, et al. (2009) Direct costs of myopia in Singapore. Eye 23(5): 1086–1089.
8.Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Adams AJ. (1996) Myopia. The nature versus nurture debate goes on. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37(6): 952–957.
9.Dirani M, et al. (2006) Heritability of refractive error and ocular biometrics: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(11): 4756–4761.
10.Pacella R, et al. (1999) Role of genetic factors in the etiology of juvenile-onset myopia based on a longitudinal study of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 76(6): 381–386.
11.Ashton GC. (1985) Segregation analysis of ocular refraction and myopia. Hum Hered 35(4): 232–239.
12.Ciner E, et al. (2009) Genome-wide scan of African-American and white families for linkage to myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 147(3): 512–517 e2.
13.Saw SM, et al. (2002) Nearwork in early-onset myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(2): 332–329.
14.Rose KA, et al. (2008) Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology 115(8): 1279–1285.
15.Dirani M, et al. (2009) Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children. Br J Ophthalmol 93(8): 997–1000.
16.Luo HD, et al. (2006) Defining myopia using refractive error and uncorrected logMAR visual acuity >0.3 from 1334 Singapore school children ages 7–9 years. Br J Ophthalmol 90(3): 362–366.
17.Negrel AD, et al. (2000) Refractive Error Study in Children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey. Am J Ophthalmol 129(4): 421–426.
42W.C.J. Low, T.Y. Wong and S.-M. Saw
18.Ip JM, et al. (2007) Ethnic differences in the impact of parental myopia: findings from a population-based study of 12-year-old Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(6): 2520–2528.
19.Zadnik K, et al. (1994) The effect of parental history of myopia on children’s eye size. JAMA 271(17): 1323–1327.
20.Saw SM, et al. (2002) Component dependent risk factors for ocular parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Ophthalmology 109(11): 2065–2071.
21.Goss DA, Jackson TW. (1996) Clinical findings before the onset of myopia in youth: 4. Parental history of myopia. Optom Vis Sci 73(4): 279–82.
22.Yap M, et al. (1993) Role of heredity in the genesis of myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13(3): 316–319.
23.Jones LA, et al. (2007) Parental history of myopia, sports and outdoor activities, and future myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(8): 3524–3532.
24.Mutti DO, et al. (2002) Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(12): 3633–3640.
25.Hui J, Peck L, Howland HC. (1995) Correlations between familial refractive error and children’s non-cycloplegic refractions. Vision Res 35(9): 1353–1358.
26.Keller JT. (1973) A comparison of the refractive status of myopic children and their parents. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 50(3): 206–211.
27.Lam DS, et al. (2008) The effect of parental history of myopia on children’s eye size and growth: results of a longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(3): 873–876.
28.Fan DS, et al. (2005) The effect of parental history of myopia on eye size of pre-school children: A pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83(4): 492–496.
29.Ip JM, et al. (2008) Role of near work in myopia: findings in a sample of Australian school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(7): 2903–2910.
30.Williams C, et al. (2008) A comparison of measures of reading and intelligence as risk factors for the development of myopia in a UK cohort of children. Br J Ophthalmol 92(8): 1117–1121.
31.Saw SM, et al. (2001) Myopia in Singapore kindergarten children. Optometry 72(5): 286–291.
32.Hepsen IF, Evereklioglu C, Bayramlar H. (2001) The effect of reading and near-work on the development of myopia in emmetropic boys: a prospective, controlled, three-year follow-up study. Vision Res 41(19): 2511–2520.
33.Mohan M, Pakrasi S, Garg SP. (1988) The role of environmental factors and hereditary predisposition in the causation of low myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 185: 54–57.
34.Richler A, Bear JC. (1980) Refraction, nearwork and education. A population study in Newfoundland. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 58(3): 468–478.
35.Tan GJ, et al. (2000) Cross-sectional study of near-work and myopia in kindergarten children in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29(6): 740–744.
43Environmental Risk Factors for Myopia in Children
36.Lu B, et al. (2009) Associations between near work, outdoor activity, and myopia among adolescent students in rural China: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study report no. 2. Arch Ophthalmol 127(6): 769–775.
37.Jacobsen N, Jensen H, Goldschmidt E. (2008) Does the level of physical activity in university students influence development and progression of myopia? — a 2-year prospective cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(4): 1322–1327.
38.Saw SM, et al. (2002) Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(5): 1408–1413.
39.Ojaimi E, et al. (2005) Effect of stature and other anthropometric parameters on eye size and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(12): 4424–4429.
40.Wong TY, et al. (2001) The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(6): 1237–1242.
41.Lee KE, et al. (2009) Association of age, stature, and education with ocular dimensions in an older white population. Arch Ophthalmol 127(1): 88–93.
42.Eysteinsson T, et al. (2005) Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83(6): 734–738.
43.Lim LS, et al. (2009) Distribution and determinants of ocular biometric parameters in an Asian population: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
44.Wu HM, et al. (2007) Association between stature, ocular biometry and refraction in an adult population in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila eye study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 35(9): 834–839.
45.Ojaimi E, et al. (2005) Impact of birth parameters on eye size in a populationbased study of 6-year-old Australian children. Am J Ophthalmol 140(3): 535–537.
46.Saw SM, et al. (2004) The relation between birth size and the results of refractive error and biometry measurements in children. Br J Ophthalmol 88(4): 538–542.
47.Dirani M, Islam FM, Baird PN. (2009) The role of birth weight in myopia — the genes in myopia twin study. Ophthalmic Res 41(3): 154–159.
48.Saw SM, et al. (2004) Childhood myopia and parental smoking. Br J Ophthalmol 88(7): 934–937.
49.Stone RA, et al. (2006) Associations between childhood refraction and parental smoking. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(10): 4277–4287.
50.Liang YB, et al. (2009) Refractive errors in a rural Chinese adult population
The Handan Eye Study. Ophthalmology.
44W.C.J. Low, T.Y. Wong and S.-M. Saw
51.Sham WK, et al. (2009) Breastfeeding and association with refractive error in young Singapore Chinese children. Eye.
52.Chong YS, et al. (2005) Association between breastfeeding and likelihood of myopia in children. JAMA 293(24): 3001–3002.
53.Wong TY, Hyman L. (2008) Population-based studies in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol 146(5): 656–663.
