- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Dedication
- •Message
- •About the Editors
- •List of Contributors
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Methodologic Issues
- •Review of Studies (Table 1)
- •Cohort Effects on Myopia
- •Risk Factors for Myopia
- •Near work
- •Education/Income
- •Outdoor activity
- •Race/Ethnicity
- •Nuclear cataract
- •Family aggregation/Genetics
- •Siblings
- •Parent-child
- •Other family members
- •Genetics
- •Comments
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Myopia in Epidemiologic Studies
- •Risk Factors for Myopia and Ocular Biometry
- •Family history of myopia
- •Near work
- •Outdoor activity
- •Stature
- •Birth parameters
- •Smoking history
- •Breastfeeding
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Aetiological Heterogeneity of Myopia
- •Clearly genetic forms of myopia
- •School or acquired myopia
- •Misunderstandings of Heritability and Twin Studies
- •But Heritability has Its Uses
- •Evidence for Genetic Associations of School Myopia
- •Evidence for the Impact of Environmental Factors on Myopia Phenotypes
- •Gene-Environment Interactions and Ethnicity
- •Gene-Environment Interactions and Parental Myopia
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Economic evaluations
- •Full vs partial evaluations
- •Economic evaluation of myopia
- •The Economic Cost of Myopia: A Burden-of-Disease Study
- •China
- •India
- •Europe
- •Singapore
- •Southeast Asia
- •Africa
- •South America
- •Bangladesh
- •ii. Proportion of myopes paying for correction
- •Uncorrected and undercorrected refractive error, spectacle coverage rate and reasons for spectacles nonwear
- •iii. Amount paid for myopic correction
- •Singapore
- •The burden of myopia
- •Further Directions for Economic Research
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Impact of Myopia in Adults
- •Overall Conclusion
- •Future Studies
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Pathological Myopia
- •Cataract
- •Glaucoma
- •Myopic Maculopathy
- •Myopic Retinopathy
- •Retinal Detachment
- •Optic Disc Abnormalities
- •References
- •Conclusion
- •Introduction
- •The Association Between Myopia and POAG
- •Information from epidemiological studies
- •Asian populations: Myopia and POAG
- •Myopia in other situations
- •Myopia and ocular hypertension
- •Myopia in angle closure
- •Myopia in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome (PDS)
- •Theories for a Link Between Myopia and POAG
- •Glaucoma Assessment in Myopic Eyes
- •Biometric differences
- •Axial length and CCT
- •Optic disc assessment in myopic eyes
- •Visual fields in myopic eyes
- •Imaging tests and variations with myopia
- •ONH susceptibility to damage
- •The Influence of Myopia on the Clinical Management of the Glaucoma Patient
- •Glaucoma progression and myopia
- •References
- •Posterior Staphyloma
- •Myopic Chorioretinal Atrophy
- •Lacquer Cracks
- •Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization
- •Myopic Foveoschisis
- •Myopic macular hole detachments
- •Lattice degeneration
- •Retinal tears and detachments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Electroretinography
- •Ganzfeld electroretinography
- •Multifocal electroretinography
- •Assessment of Retinal Function
- •Outer retinal (photoreceptor) function
- •Post-receptoral (bipolar cell) and retinal transmission function
- •Inner retinal function
- •Macular function in myopic retina
- •Effect of Long-Term Atropine Usage on Retinal Function
- •Macular Function Associates with Myopia Progression
- •Factors Associated with ERG Changes in Myopia
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Genomic Convergence Using Genomic Content
- •Pathway Analysis
- •Pathway analysis in cancer genomics
- •Pathway analysis in GWAS
- •Non-parametric approaches
- •Parametric approaches
- •P-values combining approaches
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Definition of Myopia
- •The Classical Twin Model
- •What is the classical twin model?
- •Historical perspective
- •Statistical approaches
- •Twins, Myopia and Heritability Studies
- •Heritability studies for myopia using twins
- •Limitations of using twins in heritability studies
- •Twins and Myopia — Other Studies
- •The Importance of Twin Registries
- •Concluding Comments
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Candidate Gene Selection Strategies for Myopia
- •Genes Associated With Myopia-Related Phenotypes
- •The HGF/cMET ligand-receptor axis
- •The collagen family of genes
- •Concluding Remarks
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Phenotypes for Myopia Genetic Studies
- •Study Design
- •Genotyping and Quality Controls
- •Population Structure
- •Association Tests
- •Correlated Phenotypes
- •Imputation and Meta-Analysis
- •Visualization Tools
- •Drawing Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Search for Error Signals
- •The blur hypothesis
- •Bidirectional lens-compensation
- •Recovery from ametropia vs. compensation for lenses
- •The complication of the emmetropization end-point
- •Optical aberrations as error signals
- •Other possible visual error signals
- •How Important is Having a Fovea?
- •Mechanisms of Emmetropization
- •Scleral similarities and differences between humans and chickens
- •Retinal signals
- •Glucagon-insulin
- •Retinoic acid
- •Dopamine
- •Acetylcholine
- •Choroidal signals
- •The Role of the Choroid in the Control of Ocular Growth
- •Diurnal rhythms and control of ocular growth
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Gross Scleral Anatomy
- •Structural organization of the sclera
- •Cellular content of the sclera
- •Mechanical properties of the sclera
- •Structural Changes to the Sclera in Myopia
- •Development of structural and ultrastructural scleral changes in myopia
- •Scleral pathology and staphyloma
- •Biochemical Changes in the Sclera of Myopic Eyes
- •Structural biochemistry of the sclera in myopia
- •Degradative processes in the sclera of myopic eyes
- •Cellular changes in the sclera in myopia
- •Biomechanical Changes in the Sclera of Myopic Eyes
- •Regulators of scleral myofibroblast differentiation
- •Myofibroblast-extracellular matrix interactions
- •Cellular and matrix contributions to altered scleral biomechanics and myopia
- •Scleral Changes in Myopia are Reversible
- •Eye growth regulation during recovery from induced myopia
- •Summary and Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Spatial Visual Performance and Optical Features of the Eye
- •Axial eye growth and development of refractive state
- •Lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth
- •Corneal radius of curvature
- •Schematic eye data
- •Techniques Currently Available for Myopia Studies in the Mouse, Both for Its Induction and Measurement
- •Devices to induce refractive errors
- •Techniques to measure the induced refractive errors and changes in eye growth
- •Refractive state
- •Corneal radius of curvature
- •Axial length measurements and ocular biometry
- •Measurements of the optical aberrations of the mouse eye
- •Behavioral measurement of grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in the mouse
- •Recent Studies on Myopia in the Mouse Model: Some Examples
- •Magnitudes of experimentally induced refractive errors in wild-type mice
- •Refractive development in mutant mice
- •Pharmacological studies to inhibit axial eye growth in mice
- •Image processing and regulation of retinal genes and proteins
- •Summary
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Introduction
- •A Brief Introduction to Comparative Genomics
- •Comparative Expression
- •Genes in Retina and Sclera in Animal Models of Myopia
- •ZENK (EGR-1)
- •Scleral Gene Expression in a Mouse Model of Myopia
- •RNA, Target cDNA and Microarray Chip Preparation
- •Microarray Data Analysis
- •Scleral Gene Expression in the Myopic Mouse
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Possible Mechanisms of Pharmacological Treatment
- •Efficacy Studies
- •Other Issues Related to Drugs
- •Potential Side Effects
- •The Future of Drug Treatment in Myopia
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Accommodation
- •Close work
- •Physical characteristics of the retinal image
- •Visual deprivation
- •Compensatory changes in refraction
- •Intensity and periodicity of light exposure
- •Spatial frequency
- •Light periodicity
- •Image clarity
- •Outdoor activity and retinal image blur
- •Light vergence and photon catch
- •Chromaticity
- •Therapeutic implications
- •References
- •Index
Myopia
Animal Models to Clinical Trials
This page intentionally left blank
Myopia
Animal Models to Clinical Trials
editors Roger W. Beuerman
Seang-Mei Saw Donald T. H. Tan Tien-Yin Wong
Singapore Eye Research Institute Singapore National Eye Centre National University of Singapore

World Scientific
N E W J E R S E Y • L O N D O N • S I N G A P O R E • B E I J I N G • S H A N G H A I • H O N G K O N G • TA I P E I • C H E N N A I
Published by
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224
USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601
UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Myopia : animal models to clinical trials / editors, Roger W. Beuerman ... [et al.]. p. ; cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-981-283-297-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 981-283-297-1 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. Myopia. I. Beuerman, Roger W., 1942–
[DNLM: 1. Myopia. 2. Clinical Trials as Topic--methods. 3. Disease Models, Animal. WW 320 M9962 2010]
RE938.M963 2010 617.7'55--dc22
2010010940
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Copyright © 2010 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the Publisher.
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher.
Typeset by Stallion Press
Email: enquiries@stallionpress.com
Printed in Singapore.
Foreword
The field of myopia research is curiously different from research into the etiology of other medical conditions. Whereas for most conditions, research on animals models is universally held to be essential for understanding the etiology and promising treatment modalities, in the case of myopia there is little cross-over from laboratory to clinic, despite the dramatic findings that animals can be made myopic or hyperopic in compensation for defocus imposed by spectacle lenses — a result consistent with the prevalence of other diseases being associated with homeostatic mechanisms. Why this disconnect between animal and clinical studies of myopia? One likely cause is the strong association of the prevalence of myopia with educational level, making it seem to be a uniquely human disorder. This association has led to speculative conjectures about how myopia develops, but has not led to effective prophylaxis. As a result of this lack of therapeutic progress, some have rejected the possibility of arresting myopia by relatively non-invasive visual treatments. Despite several decades of experimental studies of myopia in animals, many clinicians continue to consider myopia as a particularly human conditions, or as a consequence of one’s genetic makeup, and regard the animal studies as only weakly
v
vi Foreword
related to why humans become myopic. Given that every few years a new group of animals is added to the myopia zoo, all compensating for defocus imposed by spectacle lenses, how likely is it that humans are different?
Were the etiology of human myopia simple this controversy would have been resolved by now. But many human diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, have a complex etiology, involving both genetic and behavioral components. How do they differ from myopia? One reason may be that these diseases can be effectively treated without fully understanding their underlying causes, whereas in the case of myopia, understanding the cause of the myopia may well be necessary because simply correcting the myopia may reinstate the conditions that caused the myopia in the first place, thereby setting in motion a positive feedback loop, resulting in an iatrogenic worsening of the myopia. Indeed, some of the possible treatments (scleral reinforcement, daily atropine administration) might be worse than the disease, at least for otherwise healthy children with mild myopia.
Only now are we beginning to appreciate and measure in children the parameters likely to be important indicators of the initiation and progression of the myopia development. For example, what is the refractive status of the retinal periphery and how is it affected by visual experience? Does the periphery become hyperopic relative to the fovea as a cause or consequence of the fovea becoming myopic? Does intensive reading first affect the central or peripheral refractions? How much of the variability in peripheral refractions is a function of eye-shape at birth vs the visual surroundings, and how do these interact? If medical students are more likely to become myopic than athletes, is this due to the total amount of reading or to the duration of episodes of reading? Or to the amount of time outdoors? If the latter, is the relevant factor the absence of hyperopic or myopic defocus at the fovea or in the periphery, or perhaps the enhanced stimulation of dopamine by bright light? These are issues that can be studied in both humans and animals, but require experimental manipulations more difficult than those that have been attempted to date.
An unfortunate consequence of the complicated, multifactorial, nature of the control of eye growth and development of refractive state is that the field of research has been nearly completely divided into those doing animal research and those doing human research. My dear friend and colleague, the late Sek-Jin Chew, was an exception. He studied muscarinic receptors in different ocular tissues to understand why atropine reduced myopic progression. He studied the blinking of chicks to understand whether brief pulses of increased intraocular pressure would affect ocular
vii Foreword
elongation. And he raised mice wearing a diffuser over one eye under his bed to explore whether mice might be a useful animal model for myopia research because of the variety of genetic manipulations available. When he returned from New York to Singapore he initiated both epidemiological and animal research that led to Singapore becoming one of the world’s leading centers of myopia research. We hope this volume will be a step in the direction of bringing together the fields of animal and epidemiological research into the etiology of myopia.
Josh Wallman
Department of Biology
City University of New York
USA
Professor Sek-Jin Chew
Dedication
to the Late Professor Sek-Jin Chew
The late Professor Sek-Jin Chew was the first Singapore ophthalmologist to be awarded the Fellow College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (FRCS Ed) Gold Medal, as well as MS and PhD degrees. In 1993, he left Singapore to pursue a PhD in the USA in the midst of a promising clinical career in pursuit of his dream in research. As the first full-time medical staff of the Department of Ophthalmology in the National University Hospital (NUH), he had blazed the trail by devoting his career to full-time research, leading by example in showing how research should and must be integral to the future of ophthalmology in Singapore. From the start, he clearly identified that his research focus would primarily be dedicated to myopia, with a goal towards contributing to our knowledge of causation, and the ultimate development of new approaches towards retarding myopia progression.
After obtaining his Master’s (in anatomy) from the Louisiana State University Eye Center in the USA, he went on to attain his PhD degree (in neuroscience) at the Rockefeller University in 1996. Upon his return, he immediately set to work in getting the Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI) underway.
In those early days, he worked day and night writing grant proposals to the National Medical Research Council (NMRC), recruiting scientists locally and overseas, and cajoling medical students to participate in projects. At the same time, he was networking with industry and overseas research collaborators to build a name for Singapore as the potential hub for eye research in Asia.
It was at one of those overseas meetings that Sek-Jin fell ill, collapsed, and was discovered to have an inoperable brain tumour. Most people would have resigned themselves to fate and would have given up, but not Sek-Jin. He worked even harder and faster, knowing that he was living on borrowed time. Within a very short time, he was able to assemble funds to the tune of
ix
xDedication
S$20 million as a five-year grant from the NMRC. At the same time, he set up the SERI laboratories in the National University of Singapore (NUS) and built up a team of researchers and support staff from scratch, opening myopia research clinics. On top of that, he was seeing an increasing number of patients, recruiting school children for his myopia trials, as well as establishing successful links and clinical trials with top industry firms such as Bausch and Lomb, CIBA Vision, and others, which continue to this day.
However, I believe that it was not his brilliant academic achievements or his lightning speed in getting things done that has touched our lives the most. I believe all of us will best remember Sek-Jin for his fearless courage, his boundless optimism in coping with his brain tumour, his total devotion to his work, in spite of his terminal condition, his genuine friendship, and the interest and concern shown to even the most junior medical students.
In recognition of his work in myopia research, Sek-Jin was appointed to a number of international organisations. He was Vice President of the Myopia International Research Foundation and the Director of its AsiaPacific headquarters, based in Singapore. He was also appointed Visiting Professor at the City University of New York and the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, as well as Visiting Scientist at the Rockefeller University. Sek-Jin was also awarded the SNEC Gold Medal Award in 1997 and the SNEC International Gold Medal posthumous Award in recognition of his achievements internationally.
In his short lifespan, Sek-Jin published over 50 papers. He also made more than 150 presentations, mainly in the field of myopia research, in regional and international conferences, and in particular at the world’s foremost research meeting.
Sek-Jin played a pivotal role in establishing links between SNEC and top universities in the USA, such as Harvard with its strong emphasis in myopia research, and Johns Hopkins University in a collaborative myopia study on RGP lens. He was constantly bringing in top scientists from the USA, UK, Australia, Japan, Taiwan, and China, just to name a few, to create opportunities to start new areas of collaboration into the 21st century.
Donald T.H. Tan
FRCSG, FRCSEd, FRCOphth, FAMS
Medical Director, Singapore National Eye Centre
Chairman, Singapore Eye Research Institute
Professor of Ophthalmology
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
National University of Singapore
xi Dedication
“My dear friend and colleague, the late Sek-Jin Chew, was an exception. He studied muscarinic receptors in different ocular tissues to understand why atropine reduced myopic progression. He studied the blinking of chicks to understand whether brief pulses of increased intraocular pressure would affect ocular elongation. And he raised mice wearing a diffuser over one eye under his bed to explore whether mice might be a useful animal model for myopia research because of the variety of genetic manipulations available. When he returned from New York to Singapore, he initiated both epidemiological and animal research that led to Singapore becoming one of the world’s leading centers of myopia research.”
Professor Josh Wallman
Department of Biology
City College, CUNY, USA
“Dr Sek-Jin Chew who was also my student, was my friend and a leader of research at the National University of Singapore. We founded the Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI) of which he was the founding deputy director. Sek-Jin’s intense interest in myopia has made Singapore one of the world’s leading centers for myopic studies.”
Professor Arthur S.M. Lim
Founding Chairman
Singapore Eye Research Institute
“I first met Sek-Jin here in Singapore at the WOC in 1988; he had a dream to become the first clinician-scientist in Singapore and to establish an eye research institute here. He achieved both goals in a remarkably short-time and it is a great honor for all of us to recognize that his dream has taken root and grown. Sek and Esther were married while he worked in my lab in the US and they became dear friends.
Roger W. Beuerman
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Duke-NUS
SRP Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
National University of Singapore
xii Dedication
“Despite the onset of a fatal illness, he continued to direct the institute, organize its programmes, and produce a flood of ideas to encourage his team.”
Dr J.F. Cullen
Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh Newsletter
No. 55, Singapore 1999
“There are a lot of capable people, but few are both capable and respectable like Sek-Jin…. He was visionary, selfless, and both a good team leader and team player. One of his favorite quotes was, ‘Let’s work together.”’
Professor Dennis Lam
Chairman
Department of Ophthalmology
and
Visual Sciences of the Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Sek-Jin was a dedicated and highly motivated researcher who did not spare himself even when he knew that a brain tumour threatened his long-term future. He directed SERI up until his life was cruelly cut short. Together in New York, Glasgow and in Singapore, Sek-Jin and I put together a plan for what became the Singapore Eye Research Institute. It is a sadness that he was not spared to see the flowering of the seed that was planted at that time.
Wallace S. Foulds, CBE, MD, ChM
DSc (Hon), FRCS (Eng & Glasg), FRCOphth
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Singapore
University of Glasgow
United Kingdom
Message
Myopia: Clinical Analysis to Animal Models
Dedicated to the late Professor Sek-Jin Chew
Myopia has for some years been of great concern to Singaporeans because of its increased incidence, especially among the Chinese.
The prevalence of myopia in Singapore now ranges from 25% to 50% among students, and up to 80% among undergraduates. Paradoxically, this problem also presents ophthalmologists with opportunities to make significant contributions.
The problem of myopia is complex. We are still unclear in biological terms how myopia occurs. Is it due to the collagen at the posterior pole? Is this collagen different from that present in the rest of the sclera? What is the role of retinal pigment epithelium? The application of molecular and cell biology may lead to some answers to the numerous questions regarding the etiology of myopia.
A worrying medical point is that when myopia is high, e.g. six dioptres or more, degenerative changes may develop in the retina affecting the macula and leading to poor vision in middle age or peripheral retinal degeneration may occur leading to retinal tear and detachment.
We have known for many years that myopia tends to run in families and genetic studies will be valuable. What environmental factors aggravate myopia? Is myopia associated with prolonged use of the computer or with prolonged reading? Will eye exercises help? Will genetic therapy help? Do we know of factors that can slow down the progress of myopia? There are numerous unanswered questions.
Myopia is more common among the Chinese. “Why?” The late Professor Ida Mann noted that the hunters of Europe like the Germans and the aborigines of Australia were not myopic because if they could see
xiii
xiv Message
far, they would not survive. In contrast, Chinese scholars, craftsmen and artists engaged in near work survived. This might explain why, over the generations, myopia has become prevalent among the Chinese.
There are many studies to slow down the progress of myopia — eye exercises, eye massages, avoidance of prolonged reading, use of Atropine, use of large letters on white or black boards in school and a host of other methods.
Many have sought alternatives to the use of spectacles. Contact lenses became popular but their use is not without problems. In fact, the use of soft lenses can lead to infection which has caused blindness. When the patient is 20-year or older, his vision can be improved with surgery, the most popular of which is the use of the excimer laser. More recently, LASIK — where a thin layer of the cornea is lifted before the application of laser — has been used. There are now several new lasers and methods of refractive surgery being introduced. This book addresses myopia and I believe that readers will find it useful in their understanding of the condition.
I am delighted that this publication is dedicated to one of the world’s most enthusiastic researchers on myopia — the late Dr Sek-Jin Chew who was also my student, my friend and a leader of research at the National University of Singapore. We founded the Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI) of which he was the founding deputy director. Sek Jin’s intense interest in myopia has made Singapore one of the world’s leading centres for myopic studies.
While we wait for research to give us more answers, this book is a useful guide for anyone wishing to learn more about myopia.
Professor Arthur Lim, MD (Hon), FRCS
Founding Chairman
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Contents
Foreword |
v |
Dedication |
ix |
Message |
xiii |
About the Editors |
xix |
List of Contributors |
xxiii |
Acknowledgments |
xxvii |
Section 1 |
Epidemiology and Risk Factors |
1 |
Chapter 1.1 Epidemiology of Myopia and Myopic Shift |
3 |
|
|
in Refraction |
|
|
Barbara E.K. Klein |
|
Chapter 1.2 |
Environmental Risk Factors for Myopia in Children |
23 |
|
Wilson C.J. Low, Tien-Yin Wong and Seang-Mei Saw |
|
Chapter 1.3 |
Gene-Environment Interactions in the Aetiology |
45 |
|
of Myopia |
|
|
Ian G. Morgan and Kathryn A. Rose |
|
Chapter 1.4 |
The Economics of Myopia |
63 |
|
Marcus C.C. Lim and Kevin D. Frick |
|
xv
xvi Contents
Section 2 |
Clinical Studies and Pathologic Myopia |
81 |
Chapter 2.1 Quality of Life and Myopia |
83 |
|
|
Ecosse L. Lamoureux and Hwee-Bee Wong |
|
Chapter 2.2 Ocular Morbidity of Pathological Myopia |
97 |
|
|
V. Swetha E. Jeganathan, Seang-Mei Saw |
|
|
and Tien-Yin Wong |
|
Chapter 2.3 |
Myopia and Glaucoma |
121 |
|
Shamira A. Perera and Tin Aung |
|
Chapter 2.4 |
The Myopic Retina |
137 |
|
Shu-Yen Lee |
|
Chapter 2.5 |
Retinal Function |
149 |
|
Chi D. Luu and Audrey W.L. Chia |
|
Section 3 |
Genetics of Myopia |
161 |
Chapter 3.1 |
New Approaches in the Genetics of Myopia |
163 |
|
Liang K. Goh, Ravikanth Metlapally |
|
|
and Terri Young |
|
Chapter 3.2 |
Twins Studies and Myopia |
183 |
|
Maria Schäche and Paul N. Baird |
|
Chapter 3.3 |
TIGR, TGFB1, cMET, HGF, Collagen Genes, |
201 |
|
and Myopia |
|
|
Chiea-Chuen Khor |
|
Chapter 3.4 |
Statistical Analysis of Genome-wide Association |
215 |
|
Studies for Myopia |
|
|
Yi-Ju Li and Qiao Fan |
|
xvii Contents
Section 4 |
Animal Models and the Biological Basis |
237 |
|
of Myopia |
|
Chapter 4.1 The Relevance of Studies in Chicks for |
239 |
|
|
Understanding Myopia in Humans |
|
|
Josh Wallman and Debora L. Nickla |
|
Chapter 4.2 |
The Mechanisms Regulating Scleral Change |
267 |
|
in Myopia |
|
|
Neville A. McBrien |
|
Chapter 4.3 |
The Mouse Model of Myopia |
303 |
|
Frank Schaeffel |
|
Chapter 4.4 |
Gene Analysis in Experimental Animal Models |
331 |
|
of Myopia |
|
|
Roger W. Beuerman, Liang K. Goh and |
|
|
Veluchamy A. Barathi |
|
Section 5 |
Interventions for Myopia |
343 |
Chapter 5.1 |
Atropine and Other Pharmacological Approaches |
345 |
|
to Prevent Myopia |
|
|
Louis M.G. Tong, Veluchamy A. Barathi |
|
|
and Roger W. Beuerman |
|
Chapter 5.2 |
Physical Factors in Myopia and Potential |
361 |
|
Therapies |
|
|
Wallace S. Foulds and Chi D. Luu |
|
Index |
|
387 |
This page intentionally left blank
