Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
36.2 Mб
Скачать

17 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

203

 

 

posed by SCC must be balanced with the risks of a new immunosuppressive regimen and rejection. The transplant physician should be advised by the dermatologist or Mohs surgeon of the impact of SCC on the patient’s quality of life and estimates of morbidity and mortality for high-risk tumors conveyed.

17.5.8 Follow-Up for High-Risk SCC Patients

Because patients with nodal disease can be cured up to 73% of the time [104], patients with cutaneous SCC should be closely followed for recurrence; early detection and treatment are crucial. Full skin and lymph node exam by a dermatologist every 3–6 months is advised with 95% of local recurrences and metastases occurring within 5 years [11]. A neurological exam should be performed if indicated. Aggressive management of actinic keratoses and early biopsy of suspicious or persistent lesions are recommended. For more advanced cases, such as with PNI, with multiple recurrences, or in those who are at higher risk of aggressive tumor behavior secondary to immunosuppression, re-imaging of the draining nodal basin can be considered every 6 months.

Summary: Treatment of Field Cancerization

The treatment of the immunosuppressed patient with diffuse actinic damage and innumerable atypical squamous tumors requires field therapy, applied sequentially. The treatment of “field cancerization” is likely to improve the quality of life of such patients, ideally limiting the development of invasive disease and the time spent in health care facilities.

As stated above, the first step in an immunocompromised patient is to address and improve their immune status when possible. This should be followed by clearing all invasive SCCs. Histologic margins should be examined for all invasive SCCs, and electrodessication and curettage should be avoided. One approach that is acceptable to patients due to its efficiency is the use of disc excision without prior biopsy to clear numerous invasive SCCs on the body. Invasion can often be determined clinically by the presence of dermal induration. Patients can be seen monthly, and multiple tumors can be removed at each visit. Wound care instructions for secondary intention healing are provided. Tumors that are appropriate for Mohs (large lesions and those on the head, below the knees, and hands) may be biopsied and then treated via Mohs excision. This “clean-up” phase to remove invasive tumors may require several months of frequent visits.

Concurrently, hypertrophic actinic keratoses and suspected early SCCIS are curetted to remove hyperkeratotic overlying scale (Fig. 17.6). This is followed immediately by topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) twice a day for a month to a given field. Such a regimen can markedly improve field cancerization (Fig. 17.7). Application of petrolatum every 3–6 h to the treated area can reduce theburningsensationandincreasetolerability.Imiquimod is less useful in this setting given the eroded skin surface and large areas of involvement which can lead to increased systemic absorption and severe flu-like side effects. Similarly, cryotherapy has a limited role in the treatment of field cancerization, as it cannot be applied to large surface areas. Curettage of hyperkeratotic AKs and SCCISs followed by 5-FU may be repeated as needed. Patients with severe dermatoheliosis may need re-treatment every 6–12 months to maintain control of their disease. Lesions that fail to clear must be biopsied or treated with disc excision [132].

Another option for the treatment of field cancerization includes cyclic photodynamic therapy (PDT). The

17.6Treatment of Field Cancerization use of 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) under plastic

Patients with diffuse actinic damage on the AK/SCCIS spectrum, termed “field cancerization,” who develop multiple SCCs, particularly OTRs, must be approached differently than the typical sun-damaged patient with one or few tumors. These field-damaged patients spend a considerable amount of time in health care facilities, and their tumors may adversely affect their quality of life in addition to their long-term survival.

wrap occlusion followed by PDT with blue light (417 nm) every 2–4 months has been shown to reduce cutaneous SCC formation by 95% when compared to the year preceding the initiation of this method [133].

If patients continue to develop multiple cancers 6–12 months after instituting the above methods for field treatment, the addition of low-dose oral retinoids, dosed as discussed above, should be considered for tumor prophylaxis. Again, patients are likely to require

204

N.R. LeBoeuf et al.

 

 

Fig. 17.6 (a) Diffuse hyperkeratoic actinic keratoses and SCCIS with a dermally invasive tumor on the infero-lateral aspect of left leg. (b) The same patient after Mohs excision of the invasive SCC and light curettage of the AKs and SCCISs. He immediately began a 4-week course of 5% 5-fluorouracil cream twice daily with good clearance of disease although re-treatment every 6 months is required to maintain the effect. Few invasive tumors are developing with this intensive approach

lifelong therapy given the probability of returning to their pretreatment baseline upon discontinuing retinoids. Dose reduction, including alternate day therapy, should be considered, rather than discontinuation, when possible.

Summary: Conclusions

Cutaneous SCC is common and can be aggressive, with high morbidity and mortality particularly in the immunocompromised. A thorough understanding of disease development as well as all available treatment options is critical in optimizing patient care.

Fig. 17.7 (a) Diffuse actinic keratoses and SCCIS. (b) The same patient after a 4-week course of 5% 5-fluorouracil cream twice daily with marked improvement

17.7Conclusions

SCC is the second most common malignancy in white persons, and despite its visibility on the skin, accounts for thousands of deaths annually in the USA. Although

17 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

 

most tumors are easily cured with surgical excision,

10.

Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, et al. Analysis of

identification of high-risk SCC is imprecise. Without

 

risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-

 

cell carcinoma: a prospective

study.

Lancet Oncol.

reliable prognostic models, there is ambiguity in treat-

 

 

2008;9(8):713–20.

 

 

ment guidelines and the optimal care of high-risk

 

 

 

11.

Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL. Prognostic factors for local

patients. Current practice

standards have developed

 

recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell car-

from clinician experience and primarily uncontrolled

 

cinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment

 

modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(6):976–90.

case-series data. Based on the information currently

 

12.

Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Hess SD, Katz KA, Berg D,

available, invasive cutaneous SCC is best managed by

 

Schmults CD. Uncertainty in the perioperative management

detecting disease early,

identifying high-risk tumors

 

of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma among

and patients, initiating

surgical treatment with

clear

 

Mohs surgeons. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(11):1225–31.

13.

Alam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N

margins whenever possible, utilizing Mohs surgery for

 

Engl J Med. 2001;344(13):975–83.

 

all high-risk tumors, and considering staging of drain-

 

 

14. Kwa RE, Campana K, Moy RL. Biology of cutaneous

ing nodal basins and adjuvant radio or chemotherapy

 

squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;

when appropriate. Close follow-up is important in high-

 

26(1):1–26.

 

 

15. English DR, Armstrong BK, Kricker A, Winter MG, Heenan

risk cases to detect any recurrences early. Prospective,

 

PJ, Randell PL. Demographic characteristics, pigmentary and

multicenter studies are necessary to more accurately

 

 

cutaneous risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the

stratify

risk

and define optimal

management.

 

skin: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1998;76(5):628–34.

Development of reliable prognostic models will greatly

16. Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and non-

 

melanoma skin cancer – the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med

aid treatment decisions in cutaneous SCC. Controlled

 

 

Biol. 2008;624:89–103.

 

 

clinical trials of staging and adjuvant therapy for high-

 

 

 

17. Masini C, Fuchs PG, Gabrielli F, et al. Evidence for the

risk patients and of non-surgical treatments for low-risk

 

association of human papillomavirus infection and cutane-

disease

should

ultimately

decrease

morbidity

and

 

ous squamous cell carcinoma in immunocompetent indi-

 

viduals. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(7):890–4.

improve overall survival for SCC patients.

 

 

 

 

 

18.

Wong SS, Tan KC, Goh CL. Cutaneous manifestations of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

chronic arsenicism: review of seventeen cases. J Am Acad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dermatol. 1998;38(2 Pt 1):179–85.

 

References

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.

Herman S, Rogers HD, Ratner D. Immunosuppression and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

squamous cell carcinoma: a focus on solid organ transplant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Johnson TM, Rowe DE, Nelson BR, Swanson NA. Squamous

 

recipients. Skinmed. 2007;6(5):234–8.

 

20. Mehrany K, Weenig RH, Lee KK, Pittelkow MR, Otley CC.

cell carcinoma of the skin (excluding lip and oral mucosa).

 

Increased metastasis and mortality from cutaneous squamous

J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:467–84.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

cell carcinoma in patients with chronic lymphocytic leuke-

2. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics,

 

 

mia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(6):1067–71.

1999. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999;49(1):8–31.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.

Nguyen P, Vin-Christian K, Ming ME, Berger T. Aggressive

3. Scotto J, Kopf AW, Urbach F. Non-melanoma skin cancer

 

squamous cell carcinomas in persons infected with the human

among Caucasians in four areas of the United States. Cancer.

 

 

immunodeficiency virus. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(6):758–63.

1974;34(4):1333–8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22.

Mallipeddi R. Epidermolysis bullosa and cancer. Clin Exp

4. Fears TR, Scotto J. Estimating increases in skin cancer mor-

 

Dermatol. 2002;27(8):616–23.

 

 

bidity

due to

increases

in

ultraviolet radiation exposure.

 

 

 

23. Preston DS, Stern RS. Nonmelanoma cancers of the skin. N

Cancer Invest. 1983;1(2):119–26.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Engl J Med. 1992;327:1649–62.

 

 

5. Chuang TY, Reizner GT, Elpern DJ, Stone JL, Farmer ER.

 

 

 

24.

Leffell DJ. The scientific basis of skin cancer. J Am Acad

Nonmelanoma skin cancer in Japanese ethnic Hawaiians in

 

Dermatol. 2000;42(1 Pt 2):18–22.

 

Kauai, Hawaii: an incidence report. J Am Acad Dermatol.

 

 

25. Marks R, Jolley D, Dorevitch AP, Selwood TS. The inci-

1995;33(3):422–6.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dence of non-melanocytic skin

cancers

in an Australian

6. Harris RB, Griffith K, Moon TE. Trends in the incidence of

 

 

population: results of a five-year prospective study. Med J

nonmelanoma skin cancers in southeastern Arizona, 1985–

 

 

Aust. 1989;150(9):475–8.

 

 

1996. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(4):528–36.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26. Marks R, Rennie G, Selwood T. The relationship of basal

7. Athas WF, Hunt WC, Key CR. Changes in nonmelanoma skin cancer

 

cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas to solar kera-

incidence between 1977–1978 and 1998–1999 in Northcentral New

 

 

toses. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(7):1039–42.

Mexico. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(10):1105–8.

 

27. Dobson JM, DeSpain J, Hewett JE, Clark DP. Malignant

8. Miller DL, Weinstock MA. Non-melanoma skin cancer in the

 

potential of actinic keratoses and the controversy over

United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994; 30: 774–8.

 

treatment: a patient-oriented perspective. Arch Dermatol.

9. Karagas MR, Greenberg ER, Spencer SK, Stukel TA, Mott

 

1991;127:1029–31.

 

 

LA. Increase in incidence rates of basal cell and squamous

28.

Moon TE, Levine N, Cartmel B, et al. Effect of retinol to

cell skin cancer in New Hampshire, USA. New Hampshire

 

prevent squamous cell skin cancer in moderate-risk subjects.

Skin Cancer Study Group. Int J Cancer. 1999;81(4):555–9.

 

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:949–56.

206

N.R. LeBoeuf et al.

 

 

29. Forslund O, Iftner T, Andersson K, et al. Cutaneous human papillomaviruses found in sun-exposed skin: beta-papillo- mavirus species 2 predominates in squamous cell carcinoma. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(6):876–83. Epub August 6, 2007.

30.OrthG,JablonskaS,Jarzabek-ChorzelskaM,etal.Characteristics of the lesions and risk of malignant conversion associated with the type of human papillomavirus involved in epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Cancer Res. 1979;39:1074–82.

31. Karagas MR, Nelson HH, Zens MS, et al. Squamous cell and basal cell carcinoma of the skin in relation to radiation therapy and potential modification of risk by sun exposure. Epidemiology. 2007;18(6):776–84.

32. Daling J, Madeleine M, Johnson LG, et al. Human papillomavirus, smoking, and sexual practices in the etiology of anal cancer. Cancer. 2004;101:270–80.

33. Frisch M, Fenger C, van den Brule ACJ, et al. Variants of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and perianal skin and their relation to human papillomaviruses. Cancer Res. 1999;59:753–7.

34. Bjorge T, Engeland A, Luostarinen T, et al. Human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for anal and perianal skin cancer in a prospective study. Br J Cancer. 2002;87:61–4.

35.Johnson LG, Madeleine MM, Newcomer LM, Schwartz SM, Daling JR. Anal cancer incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology and end results experience, 1973– 2000. Cancer. 2004;101:281–8.

36.Frisch M, Biggar R, Goedert JJ. Human papillomavirusassociated cancers in patients with human immunodefi-

ciency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1500–10.

37. Liu X, Dakic A, Zhang Y, Dai Y, Chen R, Schlegel R. HPV E6 protein interacts physically and functionally with the cellular telomerase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(44):18780–5.

38.Muench P, Probst S, Schuetz J, et al. Cutaneous papillomavirus E6 proteins must interact with p300 and block p53mediated apoptosis for cellular immortalization and tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2010;70(17):6913–24.

39.Farhat S, Nakagawa M, Moscicki A. Cell-mediated immune responses to human papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7 antigens as measured by IFN gamma ELISpot in women with cleared or persistent HPV infection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(4):508–12.

40.Natarajan E, Saeb M, Crum CP, et al. Co-expression of p16INK4A and laminin 5g2 by microinvasive and superficial squamous cell carcinomas in vivo and by migrating wound and senescent

keratinocytes in culture. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:477–91.

41. Natarajan E, Omobono JD, Guo Z, et al. A keratinocyte hypermobility/growth arrest response involving laminin 5 and p16INK4A activated in wound healing and senescence. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:1821–37.

42. Moussai D, Mitsui H, Pettersen JS, et al. The human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment is characterized by increased lymphatic density and enhanced expression of macrophage-derived VEGF-C. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(1):229–36. Epub September 9, 2010.

43. Haider AS, Peters SB, Kaporis H, et al. Genomic analysis defines a cancer-specific gene expression signature for human squamous cell carcinoma and distinguishes malignant hyperproliferation from benign hyperplasia. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:869–81.

44. Clark RA, Huang SJ, Murphy GF, et al. Human squamous cell carcinomas evade the immune response by down-regu- lation of vascular E-selectin and recruitment of regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2008;205:2221–34.

45. Huang SJ, Hijnen D, Murphy GF, et al. Imiquimod enhances IFN-g production and effector function of T cells infiltrating human squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:2276–685.

46. Williams LS, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM. Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49(4):1061–9.

47. Feldman SR, Fleischer Jr AB, McConnell RC. Most common dermatologic problems identified by internists, 1990– 1994. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(7):726–30.

48. Wieland U, Jurk S, Weisenborn S, Krieg T, Pfister H, Ritzkowsky A. Erythroplasia of Queyrat: coinfection with cutaneous carcinogenic human papillomavirus type 8 and genital papillomaviruses in a carcinoma in situ. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115:396–401.

49. Bleeker M, Heideman D, Snijders P, Horenblas S, Dillner H, Meijer C. Penile cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention. World J Urol. 2009;27:141–50.

50. Patterson JW, Kao GF, Graham JH, Helwig EB. Bowenoid papulosis. A clinicopathologic study with ultrastructural observations. Cancer. 1986;57(4):823–36.

51.Sau P, McMarlin SL, Sperling LC, Katz R. Bowen’s disease of the nail bed and periungual area. A clinicopathologic analysis of seven cases. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(2):204–9.

52.Cribier B, Asch P, Grosshans E. Differentiating squamous cell carcinoma from keratoacanthoma using histopathological criteria. Is it possible? A study of 296 cases. Dermatology. 1999;199:208–12.

53.Bouwes Bavinck JN, Hardie DR, Green A, et al. The risk of skin cancer in renal transplant recipients in Queensland, Australia. A follow-up study. Transplantation. 1996;61(5):715–21.

54. Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Miller CJ, Quon H, Smith N, Klein RQ, Schmults CD. Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of outcomes. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(4):574–85.

55. Tan PY, Ek E, Su S, Giorlando F, Dieu T. Incomplete excision of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: a prospective observational study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(4):910–6.

56. Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27(2 Pt 1):241–8.

57.Sober A. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and other cutaneous carcinomas, Chapter 29. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.

58.Lawrence N, Cottel WI. Squamous cell carcinoma of skin with perineural invasion. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31(1):30–3.

59. Leibovitch I, Huilgol SC, Selva D, Hill D, Richards S, Paver R. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia I. Experience over 10 years. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(2):253–60.

60. Kwan W, Wilson D, Moravan V. Radiotherapy for locally advanced basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(2):406–11.

17 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

207

 

 

61. Veness M, Richards S. Role of modern radiotherapy in treating skin cancer. Australas J Dermatol. 2003;44(3):159–66; quiz 67–8.

62.Miller S, Alam M, Andersen J, et al. Basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8: 836–64.

63. Breuninger H, Bootz F, Hauschild A, et al. Short German guidelines: squamous cell carcinoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008;6 Suppl 1:S5–8.

64.Stasko T, Brown MD, Carucci JA, International TransplantSkin Cancer Collaborative; European Skin Care in Organ Transplant Patients Network, et al. Guidelines for the management of squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(4 Pt 2):642–50.

65.Motley R, Kersey P, Lawrence C. Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002;1 46(1):18–25.

66.Miller SJ. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network

(NCCN) guidelines of care for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(3):289–92.

67. Committee on Guidelines of Care; Task Force on Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Guidelines for care for squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28(4):628–31.

68. Cherpelis BS, Marcusen C, Lang PG. Prognostic factors for metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(3):268–73.

69. Mullen JT, Feng L, Xing Y, et al. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: defining a high-risk group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(7):902–9.

70. Moller R, Reymann F, Hou-Jensen K. Metastases in dermatological patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(6):703–5.

71.Edwards MJ, Hirsch RM, Broadwater JR, Netscher DT, Ames FC. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in previously burned or irradiated skin. Arch Surg. 1989;124(1):115–7.

72.Ayyappan K, Ananthatkrishnan N, Sankaran V. Can regional lymph node involvement be predicted in patients with carcinoma of the penis? Br J Urol. 1994;73:549–53.

73. Magrina JF, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Weaver AL, et al. Primary squamous cell cancer of the vulva: radical versus modified radical vulvar surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;71:116–21.

74. Gerard JP, Chapet O, Samiei F, et al. Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of the literature. Cancer. 2001;92: 77–84.

75. Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Ball H, et al. Sites of failure and times to failure in carcinoma of the vulva treated conservatively: a Gynecologic Oncologic Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1128–33.

76. Kraus DH, Carew JF, Harrison LB. Regional lymph node metastasis from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(5):582–7.

77.Dinehart SM, Pollack SV. Metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and lip. An analysis of twenty-seven cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21(2 Pt 1):241–8.

78. Tavin E, Persky M. Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. Laryngoscope. 1996;106(2 Pt 1):156–8.

79.Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, et al. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(4):759–65.

80.Breuninger H, Schaumburg-Lever G, Holzschuh J, Horny HP. Desmoplastic squamous cell carcinoma of skin and vermilion surface: a highly malignant subtype of skin cancer.

Cancer. 1997;79(5):915–9.

81. Goepfert H, Dichtel WJ, Medina JE, Lindberg RD, Luna MD. Perineural invasion in squamous cell skin carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1984;148(4):542–7.

82. Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Hinerman RW, et al. Skin cancer of the head and neck with perineural invasion. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30(1):93–6.

83.Ross AS, Whalen FM, Elenitsas R, Xu X, Troxel AB, Schmults CD. Diameter of involved nerves predicts out-

comes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: an investigator-blinded retrospective cohort study. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(12):1859–66.

84. Jensen P, Hansen S, Moller B, et al. Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(2 Pt 1):177–86.

85. Adamson R, Obispo E, Dychter S, et al. High incidence and clinical course of aggressive skin cancer in heart transplant patients: a single-center study. Transplant Proc. 1998; 30(4):1124–6.

86. Ong CS, Keogh AM, Kossard S, Macdonald PS, Spratt PM. Skin cancer in Australian heart transplant recipients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(1):27–34.

87.Euvard S, Kanitakis J, Decullier E, et al. Subsequent skin cancers in kidney and heart transplant recipients after the first squamous cell carcinoma. Transplantation. 2006;81(8):1093–100.

88. Smith KJ, Hamza S, Skelton H. Histologic features in primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in immunocompromised patients focusing on organ transplant patients. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(4 Pt 2):634–41.

89. Veness MJ, Quinn DI, Ong CS, et al. Aggressive cutaneous malignancies following cardiothoracic transplantation: the Australian experience. Cancer. 1999;85(8):1758–64.

90.Carucci JA, Martinez JC, Zeitouni NC, et al. In-transit metastasis from primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients and nonimmunosuppressed patients: clinical characteristics, management, and outcome in a series of 21 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(4 Pt 2):651–5.

91.Frierson Jr HF, Deutsch BD, Levine PA. Clinicopathologic features of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Hum Pathol. 1988;19(12):1397–402.

92. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, Li KP, Suchindran C. Epidermolysis bullosa and the risk of life-threatening cancers: the National EB Registry experience, 1986–2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(2):203–11.

93. Kinlen LJ. Incidence of cancer in rheumatoid arthritis and other disorders after immunosuppressive treatment. Am J Med. 1985;78(1A):44–9.

94. Yousem DM, Som PM, Hackney DB, Schwaibold F, Hendrix RA. Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology. 1992;182(3):753–9.

95. Ginsberg LE. MR imaging of perineural tumor spread. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2002;10(3):511–25.

96. Land R, Herod J, Moskovic E, et al. Routine computerized tomography scanning, groin ultrasound with or without fine needle aspiration cytology in the surgical management of

208

N.R. LeBoeuf et al.

 

 

primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(1):312–7.

97. Cho SB, Chung WG, Yun M, Lee JD, Lee MG, Chung KY. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 12 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(4):442–6; discussion 6–7.

98. Bailet JW, Abemayor E, Jabour BA, Hawkins RA, Ho C, Ward PH. Positron emission tomography: a new, precise imaging modality for detection of primary head and neck tumors and assessment of cervical adenopathy. Laryngoscope. 1992;102(3):281–8.

99. Ross AS, Schmults CD. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the English literature. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(11): 1309–21.

100.Zachary CB, Rest EB, Furlong SM, Arcedo PN, McGeorge BC, Kist DA. Rapid cytokeratin stains enhance the sensitivity of Mohs micrographic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20(8):530–5.

101.Cherpelis BS, Turner L, Ladd S, Glass LF, Fenske NA. Innovative 19-minute rapid cytokeratin immunostaining of nonmelanoma skin cancer in Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(7):1050–6.

102.Veness MJ, Ong C, Cakir B, Morgan G. Squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. Patterns of relapse and outcome: reporting the Westmead Hospital experience, 1980–1997. Australas Radiol. 2001;45(2):195–9.

103.Cox J, editor. Radiation oncology: rationale, techniques, results. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2003.

104.Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Palme CE, Gebski V. Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to lymph nodes: combined treatment should be considered best practice. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(5):870–5.

105.Chambon PT. The retinoid signaling pathway: molecular and genetic analysis. Semin Cell Biol. 1999;5:115–25.

106.Wright TI, Spencer JM, Flowers FP. Chemoprevention of non-melanoma skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:933–46.

107.Harwood CA, Leedham-Green M, Leigh IM, Proby CM. Low-dose retinoids in the prevention of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients: a 16-year retrospective study. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(4): 456–64.

108.Bavinck JN, Tieben LM, Van der Woude FJ, et al. Prevention of skin cancer and reduction of keratotic skin lesions during acitretin therapy in renal transplant recipients: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1933–8.

109.McKenna DB, Murphy GM. Skin cancer chemoprophylaxis in renal transplant recipients: 5 years experience using low-dose acitretin. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140:656–60.

110.Marquez C, Bair SM, Smithberger E, Cherpelis BS, Glass LF. Systemic retinoids for chemoprevention of non-mela- noma skin cancer in high-risk patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010;9(7):753–8.

111.Otley CC, Maragh SL. Reduction of immunosuppression for transplant-associated skin cancer: rationale and evidence of efficacy. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(2):163–8.

112.Toma S, Bonelli L, Sartoris A, et al. 13-cis retinoic acid in head and neck cancer chemoprevention: results of a randomized trial from the Italian Head and Neck Chemoprevention Study Group. Oncol Rep. 2004;11(6):1297–305.

113.Brewster AM, Lee JJ, Clayman GL, et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alfa for patients with aggressive skin squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(15):1974–8.

114.Cartei G, Cartei F, Interlandi G, et al. Oral 5-fluorouracil in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in the aged. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000;23(2):181–4.

115.Wollina U, Hansel G, Koch A, Kostler E. Oral capecitabine plus subcutaneous interferon alpha in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005;131(5):300–4.

116.Hitt R, Jimeno A, Rodriguez-Pinilla M, et al. Phase II trial of cisplatin and capecitabine in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and correlative study of angiogenic factors. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(12):2005–11.

117.Bentzen JD, Hansen HS. Phase II analysis of paclitaxel and capecitabine in the treatment of recurrent or disseminated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. Head Neck. 2007;29(1):47–51.

118.Kim JG, Sohn SK, Kim DH, et al. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(10):1117–21.

119.Nanney LB, Magid M, Stoscheck CM, King LE. Comparison of epidermal growth factor binding and receptor distribution in normal human epidermis and epidermal appendages. J Invest Dermatol. 1984;83(5):385–93.

120.Shimizu T, Izumi H, Oga A, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression and genetic aberrations in metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin. Dermatology. 2001;202(3):203–6.

121.Suen JK, Bressler L, Shord SS, Warso M, Villano JL. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma responding serially to single-agent cetuximab. Anticancer Drugs. 2007;18(7):827–9.

122.Bauman JE, Eaton KD, Martins RG. Treatment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the skin with cetuximab. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(7):889–92.

123.Arnold AW, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Zuger C, Itin PH. Cetuximab therapy of metastasizing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with severe recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatology. 2009;219(1):80–3.

124.Jalili A, Pinc A, Pieczkowski F, Karlhofer FM, Stingl G, Wagner SN. Combination of an EGFR blocker and a COX-2 inhibitor for the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008;6(12):1066–9.

125.Miller K, Sherman W, Ratner D. Complete clinical response to cetuximab in a patient with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(12): 2069–74. Epub October 11, 2010.

126.Baltaci M, Fritsch P, Weber F, et al. Treatment with gefitinib (ZD 1839) in a patient with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(1):234–6.

127.Cohen EE, Rosen F, Stadler WM, et al. Phase II trial of ZD1839 in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(10):1980–7.

17 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

209

 

 

128.Stewart JS, Cohen EE, Licitra L, et al. Phase III study of gefitinib compared with intravenous methotrexate for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [corrected]. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(11):1864–71.

129.Abou Ayache R, Thierry A, Bridoux F, et al. Long-term maintenance of calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy reduces the risk for squamous cell carcinomas after kidney transplantation compared with bior tritherapy. Transplant Proc. 2007;39(8):2592–4.

130.Schena FP, Pascoe MD, Alberu J, et al. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients: 24-month efficacy and safety results from the CONVERT trial. Transplantation. 2009;87(2):233–42.

131.Rival-Tringali AL, Euvrard S, Decullier E, Claudy A, Faure M, Kanitakis J. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus reduces vascularization and thickness of post-transplant cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(6):1927–32.

132.Jennings L, Schmults CD. Management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3(4):39–48.

133.Willey A, Mehta S, Lee PK. Reduction in the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients treated with cyclic photodynamic therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(5):652–8.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for the

18

Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma

Michael Campoli*, Scott Freeman*,

David G. Brodland, and John Zitelli

Abstract

Melanoma is a clinically and biologically diverse malignancy for which complete surgical excision offers the only chance for cure. Current guidelines for surgical excision margins are based on consensus recommendations, and clear, evidencebased data to guide the surgeon in each case is limited. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offers the surgeon the ability to assess 100% of the surgical margin, far better than margins evaluated with the standard bread-loaf sectioning technique. Immunohistochemical stains such as MART-1 allow for the reliable identiÞcation of melanoma in frozen sections and produce cure rates at least as good as standard excision with traditional margins.

Keywords

Mohs micrographic surgery ¥ Melanoma ¥ Clinical margins ¥ Excision margins ¥ Immunohistochemical stains

M. Campoli ¥ S. Freeman ¥ J. Zitelli (*)

Fellows, Zitelli & Brodland, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, USA e-mail: mcampoli@gmail.com; scottrfreeman@gmail.com

D.G. Brodland

 

Departments of Dermatology and Otolaryngology,

 

Shadyside Medical Center,

 

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,

 

Pittsburgh, PA, USA

*Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

K. Nouri (ed.), Mohs Micrographic Surgery,

211

DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_18, © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012