Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
36.2 Mб
Скачать

3 Preoperative Evaluation

31

 

 

procedures such as dermabrasion, medium or deep chemical peels, and ablative or non-ablative laser resurfacing cause such extensive epidermal injury that a history of cold sores is not a reliable indicator of reactivation risk, and all patients undergoing these procedures should receive antiviral prophylaxis regardless of history. For resurfacing procedures, this prophylaxis should continue until reepithelialization is complete, usually within 7–10 days.

Summary: Discussion of Postoperative Care

The preoperative evaluation can be used to initiate the discussion of postoperative care and help frame patient expectations for the postoperative course.

postoperative visits will help maximize compliance and ensure optimal surgical outcomes.

Summary: Conclusion

Medical care of the dermatologic surgery patient begins with a simple yet complete preoperative evaluation.

After documentation of informed consent, confirmation of the presenting lesion and diagnosis, review of the patient’s past medical history and medications (with particular emphasis on anticoagulant medications), and assessment of the need for infection prophylaxis, a therapeutic plan can be tailored to the individual patient for optimal medical and surgical care.

3.7

Discussion of Postoperative Care

3.8

Conclusion

A final point to be addressed in the preoperative consultation is initiating the discussion of postoperative healing and wound care. Patients should be informed of the expected wound healing process, including expected bruising and swelling, particularly on periorbital and perioral sites. Explanation of the expected time frame for discomfort, erythema, edema, ecchymosis, and bandage use at the initial consultation will prevent unwanted surprises postoperatively. Similarly, reminding patients that epidermal sutures, if placed, will require removal can help prepare for a second office visit. If it appears that a patient will have difficulty with dressing changes and wound care due to either physical disability or a difficult-to-reach operative site, the preoperative consultation is the time to begin arrangements for assistance, either from family members or a visiting nurse service. Finally, an important aspect of the treatment for skin cancer is ensuring adequate follow up screening for second malignancy, which occurs at high frequency in these patients. While the dermatologic surgeon may not be the physician performing this screening, it is important to remind patients of the need for follow up exams even before surgery has been performed. Because it is likely that patients will retain and absorb only a fraction of the counseling advice dispensed by physicians, repetition of these points at the preoperative, operative, and

When performed properly, the preoperative evaluation is a straightforward exercise that minimizes operative and postoperative complications. With adequate verification of the presenting location and diagnosis, and examination for signs of aggressive tumor behavior, an appropriate therapeutic plan can be developed with the informed consent of the patient. Modifications can then be made based on the patient’s medical history and medication use. These may include electing not to use electrodessication or electrocoagulation in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators, choosing a less invasive reconstruction method for patients with impaired wound healing and poor functional status, or advising patients to avoid over-the-counter pain relievers and herbal supplements that impair hemostasis. Awareness of the risks of interrupting therapeutic anticoagulation, coupled with continuation of these anticoagulants preoperatively, may also decrease the incidence of serious thrombotic complications in the perioperative period. Similarly, appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis according to recently published guidelines can minimize infectious complications of dermatologic surgery while reducing the number of patients exposed to unnecessary antibiotic therapy. Medical care of the dermatologic surgery patient begins well before the surgical procedure, and optimal delivery of this care requires a directed and precise preoperative evaluation.

32

S.R. Christensen and S.Z. Aasi

 

 

References

1. Carucci JA, Leffell DJ. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Wolff K et al., editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in: general medicine. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2008. p. 1036–42.

2. Cataldo PA, Stoddard PB, Reed WP. Use of frozen section analysis in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1990;159(6):561–3.

3. Feasel AM et al. Perineural invasion of cutaneous malignancies. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(6):531–42.

4. McGinness JL, Goldstein G. The value of preoperative biopsy-site photography for identifying cutaneous lesions. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(2):194–7.

5. Rhodes LM et al. Cutaneous surgery in the elderly: ensuring comfort and safety. Dermatol Ther. 2003;16(3):243–53.

6. Fleisher LA et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of CardiovascularAnesthesiologists,SocietyforCardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(17):1971–96.

7. Dzubow LM. Blood pressure as a parameter in dermatologic surgery. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122(12):1406–7.

8.Rozner MA, Nishman RJ. Electrocautery-induced pacemaker tachycardia: why does this error continue? Anesthesiology. 2002;96(3):773–4.

9. LeVasseur JG et al. Dermatologic electrosurgery in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and pacemakers. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(2):233–40.

10.El-Gamal HM, Dufresne RG, Saddler K. Electrosurgery, pacemakers and ICDs: a survey of precautions and complications experienced by cutaneous surgeons. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(4):385–90.

11. Richards KA, Stasko T. Dermatologic surgery and the pregnant patient. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(3):248–56.

12. Berg D, Otley CC. Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(1):1–17.

13. Mehrany K et al. High recurrence rates of Basal cell carcinoma after Mohs surgery in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(8):985–8.

14. Albregts T et al. Squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. An intraoperative diagnostic challenge for the Mohs surgeon. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(2): 269–72.

15. Weinstock MA et al. Quality of life in the actinic neoplasia syndrome: the VA Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention (VATTC) Trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(2):207–15.

16. Rees TD, Liverett DM, Guy CL. The effect of cigarette smoking on skin-flap survival in the face lift patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73(6):911–5.

17.Robinson TN et al. Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):449–55.

18.Billingsley EM, Maloney ME. Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding problems in patients taking warfarin, aspirin, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents. A prospective study. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(5):381–3.

19. Otley CC et al. Complications of cutaneous surgery in patients who are taking warfarin, aspirin, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(2): 161–6.

20. Lewis KG, Dufresne Jr RG. A meta-analysis of complications attributed to anticoagulation among patients following cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(2):160–4.

21. Holmes Jr DR et al. Combining antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(2):95–109.

22.Schanbacher CF, Bennett RG. Postoperative stroke after stopping warfarin for cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(8):785–9.

23.Alam M, Goldberg LH. Serious adverse vascular events associated with perioperative interruption of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(11):992–8.

24.Kovich O, Otley CC. Thrombotic complications related to discontinuation of warfarin and aspirin therapy perioperatively for cutaneous operation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(2):233–7.

25.Wahl MJ. Dental surgery in anticoagulated patients. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(15):1610–6.

26.Fessenden JM, Wittenborn W, Clarke L. Gingko biloba: a case report of herbal medicine and bleeding postoperatively from a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2001;67(1): 33–5.

27.Chang LK, Whitaker DC. The impact of herbal medicines on dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(8):759–63.

28. Beckert BW et al. The effect of herbal medicines on platelet function: an in vivo experiment and review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7):2044–50.

29.Foster CA, Aston SJ. Propranolol-epinephrine interaction: a potential disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(1):74–8.

30.Dzubow LM. The interaction between propranolol and epinephrine as observed in patients undergoing Mohs’ surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;15(1):71–5.

31. Giles JT et al. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy and risk of serious postoperative orthopedic infection in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(2):333–7.

32.Cuesta-Herranz J et al. Allergic reaction caused by local anesthetic agents belonging to the amide group. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99(3):427–8.

33. Carmichael AJ et al. The occurrence of bacteraemia with skin surgery. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134(1):120–2.

34. Wilson WR, Van Scoy RE, Washington JA. Incidence of bacteremia in adults without infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1975;2(2):94–5.

35. Spelman DW, Weinmann A, Spicer WJ. Endocarditis following skin procedures. J Infect. 1993;26(2):185–9.

36. Wilson W et al. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on

3 Preoperative Evaluation

33

 

 

Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2007;116(15): 1736–54.

37. Wright TI et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: advisory statement 2008. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(3):464–73.

38. Strom BL et al. Risk factors for infective endocarditis: oral hygiene and nondental exposures. Circulation. 2000;102(23): 2842–8.

39. Dixon AJ et al. Prospective study of wound infections in dermatologic surgery in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(6):819–27.

40.Maragh SL, Brown MD. Prospective evaluation of surgical site infection rate among patients with Mohs micrographic

surgery without the use of prophylactic antibiotics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(2):275–8.

41.Association, A.D. and A.A.o.O. Surgeons. Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with total joint replacements. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(7):895–9.

42. Mangram AJ et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):96–132.

43.Smack DP et al. Infection and allergy incidence in ambulatory surgery patients using white petrolatum vs bacitracin ointment. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996; 276(12):972–7.

44. Dixon AJ, Dixon MP, Dixon JB. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of applying ointment to surgical wounds before occlusive dressing. Br J Surg. 2006;93(8):937–43.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery

4

Operative Room Setup

Tobechi L. Ebede, Indira Singh,

and Kishwer S. Nehal

Abstract

Office-based surgery is the standard for Mohs micrographic surgery. The design and building of a Mohs micrographic surgery suite should provide an environment for comfortable and efficient care of the patient, while meeting regulatory safety standards and the ergonomic needs of the staff. This chapter will discuss physical components of a Mohs surgery suite and operative room. Key operative room equipment will be detailed and lists of essential instruments used during Mohs surgery and reconstruction are outlined in this chapter. Finally, practice details such as photography, equipment sterilization and emergency equipment are summarized.

Keywords

Mohs surgery • Outpatient surgical suite design • Surgical equipment • Surgical instruments

T.L. Ebede (*)

Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,

New York, NY, USA e-mail: tebede@hotmail.com

I. Singh • K.S. Nehal

Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Summary: Introduction

Office-based surgery is the standard for Mohs micrographic surgery. The minimum space requirements include: a comfortable waiting room, well-equipped operative rooms, a laboratory for frozen tissue processing/histopathology slide reading, and space for cleaning and sterilizing equipment. A contractor, architect, interior designer, and occupational health specialist, knowledgeable about surgical facilities, are critical members of the development team.

K. Nouri (ed.), Mohs Micrographic Surgery,

35

DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_4, © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012