- •CONTENTS
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •I Components of Angiogenic Cascades
- •1. Introduction and Historical Perspective
- •2. The Semaphorins
- •3. The Plexin Receptor Family
- •4. The Neuropilins
- •5. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors
- •6. Signal Transduction by Neuropilins
- •7. The Role of the Neuropilins in the Regulation of Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis
- •8. Modulation of Angiogenesis by Semaphorins that Bind Directly to Plexins
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Eph receptor domain structure
- •1.2. The ephrin domain structure
- •2. Effects on Vascular Cell Behavior and Signaling Pathways
- •2.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •2.2. Ephrin-A1 and EphA4
- •2.3. Ephrin-B and EphB
- •2.3.1. EphB forward signaling
- •2.3.2. Ephrin-B reverse signaling
- •2.4. Crosstalk with other angiogenic pathways
- •3. Endothelial Cell Fate
- •4. Angiogenic Remodeling of Embryonic Blood Vessels
- •4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA receptors
- •4.2. EphB4 and Ephrin-B2
- •4.3. Other EphB receptors and Ephrin-Bs
- •5. Lymphatic Vessels
- •6. Adult Vasculature
- •6.1. Quiescent vasculature
- •6.2. Physiological angiogenesis
- •6.3. Inflammation and wound healing
- •6.4. Tumor angiogenesis
- •6.4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •6.4.2. Ephrin-B2 and EphB4
- •8. Perspectives
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Molecular Mechanisms
- •3. Role in Vascular Development
- •4. FGFs in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •5. Role of FGFs in Developmental and Tumor Lymphangiogenesis
- •7. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. The NPY System
- •2. NPY as a Growth Factor for Vascular Cells
- •3. DPPIV: A Molecular Switch of the NPY Angiogenic System
- •4. Downstream Mediators of NPY Actions
- •5. NPY in Revascularization of Ischemic Tissues
- •6. NPY in Wound Healing
- •7. NPY in Adipose Tissue Growth and Obesity
- •8. NPY in Retinopathy
- •10. NPY in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •11. NPY-Mediated Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Historical Perspective
- •3.1. The HSPG core proteins
- •3.2. The structure of the HS chain
- •3.3. The biosynthesis of HS
- •3.4. The post-synthetic processing of HSPGs
- •4. Evolution of HSPGs
- •5. HSPGs in Development
- •6. HSPG Modulation of Ligand-Receptor Interactions
- •6.2. HSPG co-receptors confer unique regulatory properties
- •6.2.1. Co-receptors engender stoichiometric control of signaling
- •6.2.2. The effects of glycanation
- •6.2.3. HS sequence motifs regulate signaling
- •7. HSPGs Enable Global Control of EC Phenotype
- •8. Future Therapeutic Directions
- •9. Conclusions
- •References
- •II Angiogenic Regulators
- •1. Introduction: Blood Vessels and Nerves Use Similar Guidance Cues
- •2. Semaphorin Signaling
- •2.1. Neuropilins
- •2.2. Plexins
- •3. Ephrins and Eph Signaling
- •3.1. Forward signaling
- •3.2. Reverse signaling
- •4. Netrin and Slit Signaling
- •5. Open Questions
- •References
- •1. Oxygen Homeostasis: Phylogeny, Ontogeny, Physiology, and Pathobiology
- •5. Control of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis by HIF-1
- •6. Control of Tumor Angiogenesis by HIF-1
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Vasculature
- •3. ROS and Angiogenesis
- •4. NAD(P)H Oxidase: A Major Source of ROS in the Vasculature
- •5. Role of NAD(P)H Oxidase in Angiogenesis
- •6. ROS as Signaling Molecules in Angiogenesis
- •8. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Assessing Coronary Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis
- •3. Pressure Overload-Induced Hypertrophy
- •4. Volume Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
- •5. Thyroxine-Induced Hypertrophy
- •6. Hypoxia-Induced Hypertrophy
- •7. Exercise-Induced Hypertrophy
- •8. Myocardial Infarction-Induced Hypertrophy
- •9. Modulators of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •10. Stimuli of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •11. Summary
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Coronary Resistance
- •3. Regulation of Coronary Microvascular Tone
- •3.1. Intrinsic and extrinsic vasomotor control
- •3.2. Role of the endothelium
- •3.3. Role of metabolism and autoregulation
- •3.4. Flow-induced dilation
- •3.5. Neurohumoral influence on microcirculation
- •3.6. Intrinsic myogenic tone
- •3.7. Impact of extravascular and humoral factors on the coronary microcirculation
- •3.8. Role of venules in coronary resistance
- •4. Endothelial Factors in Vascular Growth and Response to Injury
- •5. Impact of Disease States on Coronary Circulation
- •6. The Coronary Microcirculation in Hypertophic States
- •7. Summary
- •References
- •III Clinical Applications
- •1. Kinase Inhibition and Tumor Angiogenesis
- •2. Major Angiogenesis Factors and Receptors
- •2.1. VEGF signaling
- •3. Further Angiogenesis-Related Signaling
- •4. Need for Selectivity of Anti-Angiogenic Kinase Inhibitors
- •5. Kinase Inhibitors in Clinical Development
- •5.1. BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)
- •5.2. PTK/ZK (Vatalanib)
- •5.3. SU11248 (Sunitinib)
- •5.9. BIBF 1120
- •5.10. Chir-258
- •5.12. SU5416 (Semaxinib)
- •6. Challenges and Future Directions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Concepts and Rationales
- •3. Strategy
- •4. Clinical Trials
- •4.1. Growth factor-based, angiogenic approach
- •4.2. Cell therapy-based, vasculogenic and paracrine approach
- •5. Issues Regarding Current Strategy
- •5.1. Choice of biological agent
- •5.2. Pharmacokinetics and delivery mode
- •5.3. Monitoring of neovascularization
- •5.4. Study design
- •6. Emerging Concepts of Therapeutic Angiogenesis
- •6.1. Neovascularization responsiveness
- •6.2. Genetic determination of neovascularization
- •7. Future Prospective
- •8. Summary
- •References
- •1. Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Cardiovascular System
- •2. HGF Signaling in Endothelial Cells
- •3. Angiogenic Therapy for Ischemic Peripheral Arterial Diseases
- •4. Clinical Trial in PAD
- •5. HGF Gene Therapy for Myocardial Ischemia
- •6. HGF Gene Therapy for Restenosis After Angioplasty
- •7. Next Five Years Perspective — Future Direction of HGF Therapy
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Endothelial Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease
- •1.1. Nitric oxide synthases
- •1.2. Physiological role of endothelial NO (“EDNO”)
- •1.3. Endothelial NO-deficiency in cardiovascular diseases
- •1.4. Therapeutic restoration of endothelial NO production in cardiovascular diseases
- •2. Nitric Oxide and Angiogenesis
- •2.2. Tumor angiogenesis and NO
- •2.3. Evidence in cultured endothelial cells and in rabbit cornea
- •2.4. Role of NO in post-ischemic revascularization
- •2.6. Molecular mechanisms
- •3. NOS Gene Transfer
- •3.1. Gene delivery vectors
- •3.2. NOS-III gene transfer
- •3.3. NOS-II gene transfer
- •4.1. Impaired angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in patients with critical limb ischemia
- •4.2.1. NOS-III-KO mice
- •4.2.2. NOS-III transgenic mice
- •4.2.3. Wild-type NOS-III gene transfer in normal rats
- •4.5.1. Plasmid delivery of the NOS1177D gene
- •4.5.2. Adenoviral delivery of the NOS1179D gene
- •6. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Index
NO and Angiogenesis 403
enzyme substitutes for Akt-phosphorylated wild-type NOS-III enzyme, which results from KDR-mediated VEGF activation. Therefore the mutant gene will not require intact agonist pathway for its full activity. Furthermore, common risk factors for cardiovascular disease (oxLDL or hyperglycemia)129−131 and angiogenesis inhibitors, such as endostatin,132 interrupt Akt-mediated Serine 1177 phosphorylation in wildtype NOS-III which can all be avoided with the mutant enzyme.129
4.5.NOS-III-S1177D gene transfer in animal models of hindlimb ischemia
Two recent publications showed that transfer of this constitutively active mutant form of NOS-III gene using either adenovirus113 or naked plasmid (combined with electroporation)114 effectively rescued the structural and functional defects in angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in the ischemic hindlimbs of NOS-III-KO mice. In addition, improvement in blood flow recovery and angiogenesis in response to NOS-III gene transfer have been also demonstrated in several animal models of hindlimb ischemia without genetic deficiency in NOS-III (Akt-KO miceand non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice).
4.5.1. Plasmid delivery of the NOS1177D gene
Skeletal muscle expression of NOS1177D (the human form of mutant NOS-III) was tested in NOS-III-KO mice using intramuscular plasmid injection in combination with electroporation.114 There was no detectable NOS-III protein (measured by specific ELISA) in hindlimb musculature of NOS-III-KO mice (Fig. 6). In wild-type mice, the average level of NOS-III protein was approximately 30 pg/mg skeletal muscle wet weight. Quantitation of NOS-III protein expression from skeletal muscle homogenates by NOS-III-specific ELISA showed that the transgene expression after NOS1177D gene delivery can reach or exceed levels seen in wild-type mice (Fig. 6).
To evaluate the therapeutic potential of local mutant human NOS-III (NOS1177D) gene delivery, two groups of six-month-old NOS-III-KO mice were injected intramuscularly either with NOS1177D plasmid (pNOS1177D) or an empty vector (pNull).114 Treatment with the
404 G. M. Rubanyi
NOS-III Protein (pg/ mg muscle)
60
50
40
30
20
10
- |
+ |
wt |
NOS-III-KO |
Fig. 6. NOS-III (ecNOS) protein expression in skeletal muscle following intramuscular pNOS1177D delivery to NOS-III-KO mice. NOS-III protein level was determined by an NOS-III-specific ELISA. There was no detectable NOS-III protein in untreated hindlimb of NOS-III-KO mice (−). Treatment with pNOS1177D (+) resulted in measurable levels of NOS-III protein in NOS-III-KO mice, not different from levels measured in control (wt) mice. (Reproduced with modification by permission from the Nature Publishing Group.)
mutant NOS-III gene resulted in a significantly improved blood flow recovery compared to the pNull-treated animals (Fig. 7A). Without improvement in hindlimb perfusion, four out of eight pNull-treated mice lost the ischemic limb by day 28 (Fig. 7B). In contrast, treatment with pNOS1177D prevented limb loss in all treated animals (Fig. 7B).
4.5.2. Adenoviral delivery of the NOS1179D gene
Intramuscular injection of AdNOS1179D (the bovine form of mutant NOS-III) into the adductor muscle group of ischemic NOS-III-KO mice resulted in expression of NOS-III protein (detected by immunofluoresence microscopy).113 Intramuscular administration of AdNOSIII1179D, but not Ad-GFP, at the time of femoral arterectomy markedly improved blood flow recovery at two and four weeks after ischemia (Fig. 8), which was associated with increased angiogenesis (Fig. 8A) and arteriogenesis (Fig. 8B) in the treated limb musculature.
NO and Angiogenesis 405
(A) |
Perfusion |
|
1.2 |
pNOS1177D |
pNull |
|
|
|
|
* |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ischemic/Normal |
Ratio |
0.6 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
||
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
||
|
0 |
|
|
|
||
|
BI |
D0 |
D7 |
D28 |
||
|
|
|
||||
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 7. Intramuscular injection of plasmid NOS1177D augments post-ischemic flow recovery (A) and prevents limb loss (necrosis and auto-amputation) (B) in NOS-III-KO mice. NOS-III-KO mice underwent unilateral femoral artery resection and three days later were injected with an empty plasmid (“pNull”) (n = 8) or a plasmid carrying the mutant NOS-III-S1177D gene (pNOS1177D) (n = 8) followed by electroporation. (A) Limb blood flow was measured by laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) at various time points after surgery. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and expressed as the ratio of perfusion in the ischemic versus non-ischemic hindlimb. NOS-III S1177D gene transfer (filled columns) significantly improved LDPI flow on days 7 and 28 (D7, D28) compared to pNull treatment (open columns). p < 0.05; BI = before ischemia). (B) Ischemic tissue damage of the hindlimb was evaluated by taking photographs of the limbs on the same days when LDPI measurements were made. By day 28, the evidence of limb loss was significantly greater in the pNull–treated (four out of eight animals lost their limb) than in the pNOS1177D–treated group (none of the animals lost their limb). (Reproduced with modifications by permission from the Nature Publishing Group.)
406 G. M. Rubanyi
Fig. 8. Intramuscular injection of Ad5NOS1179D improves ischemia–induced angiogenesis (A) and arteriogenesis (B) in NOS-III-KO mice. NOS-III-KO mice were injected with Ad5GFP (n = 5) or Ad5NOS1179D (n = 5) in the adductor muscle of the ischemic left hindlimb. Four weeks after surgery and gene injection, mice were sacrificed and the gastrocnemius muscle harvested and tested for PECAM-1 (angiogenesis; A) and PECAM-1 + SMA (arteriogenesis; B) immuno-staining (as described in detail in legend to Fig. 2). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05: statistically significant differences between Ad5GFP and Ad5NOS1179D treatment. In contrast to Ad5GFP, injection of Ad5NOS1179D significantly increased post-ischemic angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. (Reproduced with modifications by permission from the National Academy of Sciences, USA.)
4.5.3.Effect of NOS1177D gene transfer in mouse CLI models without genetic deficiency of NOS-III
In a rat model of hindlimb ischemia, intramuscular injection of adenovirus carrying the wild-type human NOS-III gene increased postischemic flow recovery and angiogenesis.122 Similar to NOS-III-KO mice, balb/c mice also respond to unilateral surgical femoral artery occlusion with severe, VEGF refractory hindlimb ischemia and autoamputation.110,111 In this mouse strain, which does not have a genetic deficiency of NOS-III expression, delivery of pNOS1177D resulted in significantly improved post-ischemic blood flow recovery (K. Kauser and G. M. Rubanyi — unpublished observation). Non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice develop severe impairment in hindlimb blood flow recovery after femoral artery ligation, potentially due to diabetes-induced endothelial dysfunction resulting from lost nitric oxide activity.133 This
NO and Angiogenesis 407
model is relevant since there is a high incidence of diabetic patients in the CLI population.
The phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway have been implicated in the shear stress-induced phosphorylation of NOS-III leading to an increase in nitric oxide production. Although Akt-1-KO mice have an intact NOS-III gene present, the NOS-III activation pathway may be inhibited, resulting in a decrease in nitric oxide levels (W. Sessa — unpublished observations).
Hindlimb ischemia models were developed in both the Akt-1 KO mice (eight to 12 weeks old) and NOD mice (12 weeks old) by ligation and dissection of the proximal end of the femoral artery, proximal site of the popliteal artery, and distal portion of the saphenous artery. Immediately after surgery, AdNOS1177D (2.5 × 109 pfu for Akt-1-KO mice; 1 × 109 pfu for NOD mice), AdLacZ (1 × 109 pfu for NOD mice only), or saline was injected into three different sites of the adductor magnus and adductor longus muscle. Blood flow in the left (ischemic) and right (non-ischemic) hindlimbs was measured from the gastrocnemius muscle prior to, and immediately after surgery, and at one, two, and four weeks after surgery by using the PeriFlux system with Laser Doppler Perfusion Module (LDPM). Akt-1-KO mice develop CLI-like disease phenotype in response to surgical hindlimb ischemia, similar to what has been observed in NOS-III-KO mice. Treatment with AdNOS1177D resulted in a significant improvement in blood flow at two and four weeks following ischemia (Fig. 9A). Treatment with AdNOS1177D in NOD mice resulted in a significant improvement in blood flow compared to AdLacZ or saline-treated animals (Fig. 9B).
5.Potential Therapeutic Utility of NOS-III Gene Transfer in the Heart
5.1.Facilitation of coronary angiogenesis and ischemia-induced collateral growth
Although it have been less studied than in the peripheral (limb) vasculature, nitric oxide was shown to play a key role in angiogenesis and collateral growth also in the heart.
408 G. M. Rubanyi
Ischemic/Normal Perfusion Ratio
Ischemic/Normal Perfusion Ratio
Saline (n=5)
1.0 |
AdNOS1177D (n=5) |
|
* *
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
B.S. P.S. |
1 wk |
2 wks |
4 wks |
Time following surgery |
|
||
(A) |
Akt-1-deficient mice |
|
|
|
Saline (n=5) |
|
|
1.0 |
AdLacZ (n=6) |
|
|
0.8 |
AdNOS1177D (n=5) |
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
B.S. P.S. |
1 wk |
2 wks |
Time following surgery
(B) Non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice
Fig. 9. Intramuscular injection of Ad5NOS1177D improves blood flow recovery in ischemic hindlimb of mice without genetic deficiency of NOS-III. The effect of Ad5NOS1177D treatment was tested in two animal models of hindlimb ischemia, where endothelial NO production (Akt-1-KO mice; A) or NO availability (NOD mice; B) are reduced without genetic deficiency in NOS-III. (A) Akt-1-KO mice underwent arteriectomy of the left femoral artery followed by injection of saline (n = 5) or Ad5NOS1177D (n = 5) in the adductor muscle of the ischemic limb. Post-ischemic flow recovery was significantly ( p < 0.05) higher in the Ad5NOS1177D–treated than in the salinetreated group, two and four weeks after surgery. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and expressed as the ratio of ischemic versus non-ischemic hindlimb perfusion measured by LDPI. (B) Non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice (12 weeks old, blood glucose > 500 mg / dl) underwent arteriectomy of the left femoral artery followed by injection of saline (n = 5), Ad5LacZ (n = 6) or Ad5NOS1177D (n = 5) in the adductor muscle of the ischemic hindlimb. Ad5NOS1177D treatment significantly ( p < 0.05) augmented post-ischemic flow recovery when compared to Ad5LacZ or saline treatment, one and two weeks after surgery (B.S. = before surgery; P.S. = post-surgery). Data are shown as mean ± SEM and expressed as the ratio of ischemic versus non-ischemic hindlimb perfusion.
NO and Angiogenesis 409
In coronary post-capillary (venular) endothelial cells, nitric oxide mediates the angiogenic effect of VEGF57 by activation of ERK 1/2.134 In a canine model of repetitive myocardial ischemia, collateral blood flow (measured by microspheres) progressively increased during the 21-day experimental period, which was prevented by treatment of dogs with the NOS inhibitor L-NAME.135 Similarly, in a rat model of chronic myocardial ischemia, treatment with L-NAME significantly reduced basal and maximum left ventricular blood flow (measured by MRI) and angiogenesis.136 Ischemia-induced upregulation of VEGF production in the myocardium was not prevented by L-NAME, indicating, that similar to the peripheral vasculature, NO mediates VEGF-induced angiogenesis and collateral growth in the coronary circulation as well. An additional mechanism of NO-induced facilitation of collateral growth in the ischemic heart is suppression of anti-angiogenic molecules such as angiostatin, via downregulation of tissue matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), MMP-2 and MMP-9, which generate angiostatin.135,137
5.2.NOS-III-derived nitric oxide facilitate myocardial gene transfer by adenoviral vectors
In pre-immunized pigs (by intravenous injection of control adenovirus causing elevation of anti-adenoviral neutralizing antibody titer similar to that found in the majority of coronary artery bypass graft patients), co-injection of Ad5Luc and Ad5NOS-III via the great cardiac vein (retrograde) resulted in > 200-fold higher luciferase expression than after retrograde injection of Ad5Luc alone.138 Ad5NOS-III co-injection also reduced Ad5Luc injection-induced T-cell-mediated inflammation and cardiac myocyte apoptosis.138 These results suggested that intracardiac NOS-III gene transfer may reduce some of the known barriers to adenovirus-mediated myocardial gene transfer. Another limitation of effective myocardial gene transfer by adenoviral vectors is poor penetration of the microvascular (endothelial) barrier. It has been reported that increasing vascular permeability by VEGF pre-administration significantly augments adenoviral transfection efficiency in the isolated perfused rabbit heart, which can be inhibited by L-NAME and mimicked by the NO donor nitroglycerin.139
