- •CONTENTS
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •I Components of Angiogenic Cascades
- •1. Introduction and Historical Perspective
- •2. The Semaphorins
- •3. The Plexin Receptor Family
- •4. The Neuropilins
- •5. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors
- •6. Signal Transduction by Neuropilins
- •7. The Role of the Neuropilins in the Regulation of Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis
- •8. Modulation of Angiogenesis by Semaphorins that Bind Directly to Plexins
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Eph receptor domain structure
- •1.2. The ephrin domain structure
- •2. Effects on Vascular Cell Behavior and Signaling Pathways
- •2.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •2.2. Ephrin-A1 and EphA4
- •2.3. Ephrin-B and EphB
- •2.3.1. EphB forward signaling
- •2.3.2. Ephrin-B reverse signaling
- •2.4. Crosstalk with other angiogenic pathways
- •3. Endothelial Cell Fate
- •4. Angiogenic Remodeling of Embryonic Blood Vessels
- •4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA receptors
- •4.2. EphB4 and Ephrin-B2
- •4.3. Other EphB receptors and Ephrin-Bs
- •5. Lymphatic Vessels
- •6. Adult Vasculature
- •6.1. Quiescent vasculature
- •6.2. Physiological angiogenesis
- •6.3. Inflammation and wound healing
- •6.4. Tumor angiogenesis
- •6.4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •6.4.2. Ephrin-B2 and EphB4
- •8. Perspectives
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Molecular Mechanisms
- •3. Role in Vascular Development
- •4. FGFs in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •5. Role of FGFs in Developmental and Tumor Lymphangiogenesis
- •7. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. The NPY System
- •2. NPY as a Growth Factor for Vascular Cells
- •3. DPPIV: A Molecular Switch of the NPY Angiogenic System
- •4. Downstream Mediators of NPY Actions
- •5. NPY in Revascularization of Ischemic Tissues
- •6. NPY in Wound Healing
- •7. NPY in Adipose Tissue Growth and Obesity
- •8. NPY in Retinopathy
- •10. NPY in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •11. NPY-Mediated Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Historical Perspective
- •3.1. The HSPG core proteins
- •3.2. The structure of the HS chain
- •3.3. The biosynthesis of HS
- •3.4. The post-synthetic processing of HSPGs
- •4. Evolution of HSPGs
- •5. HSPGs in Development
- •6. HSPG Modulation of Ligand-Receptor Interactions
- •6.2. HSPG co-receptors confer unique regulatory properties
- •6.2.1. Co-receptors engender stoichiometric control of signaling
- •6.2.2. The effects of glycanation
- •6.2.3. HS sequence motifs regulate signaling
- •7. HSPGs Enable Global Control of EC Phenotype
- •8. Future Therapeutic Directions
- •9. Conclusions
- •References
- •II Angiogenic Regulators
- •1. Introduction: Blood Vessels and Nerves Use Similar Guidance Cues
- •2. Semaphorin Signaling
- •2.1. Neuropilins
- •2.2. Plexins
- •3. Ephrins and Eph Signaling
- •3.1. Forward signaling
- •3.2. Reverse signaling
- •4. Netrin and Slit Signaling
- •5. Open Questions
- •References
- •1. Oxygen Homeostasis: Phylogeny, Ontogeny, Physiology, and Pathobiology
- •5. Control of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis by HIF-1
- •6. Control of Tumor Angiogenesis by HIF-1
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Vasculature
- •3. ROS and Angiogenesis
- •4. NAD(P)H Oxidase: A Major Source of ROS in the Vasculature
- •5. Role of NAD(P)H Oxidase in Angiogenesis
- •6. ROS as Signaling Molecules in Angiogenesis
- •8. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Assessing Coronary Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis
- •3. Pressure Overload-Induced Hypertrophy
- •4. Volume Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
- •5. Thyroxine-Induced Hypertrophy
- •6. Hypoxia-Induced Hypertrophy
- •7. Exercise-Induced Hypertrophy
- •8. Myocardial Infarction-Induced Hypertrophy
- •9. Modulators of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •10. Stimuli of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •11. Summary
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Coronary Resistance
- •3. Regulation of Coronary Microvascular Tone
- •3.1. Intrinsic and extrinsic vasomotor control
- •3.2. Role of the endothelium
- •3.3. Role of metabolism and autoregulation
- •3.4. Flow-induced dilation
- •3.5. Neurohumoral influence on microcirculation
- •3.6. Intrinsic myogenic tone
- •3.7. Impact of extravascular and humoral factors on the coronary microcirculation
- •3.8. Role of venules in coronary resistance
- •4. Endothelial Factors in Vascular Growth and Response to Injury
- •5. Impact of Disease States on Coronary Circulation
- •6. The Coronary Microcirculation in Hypertophic States
- •7. Summary
- •References
- •III Clinical Applications
- •1. Kinase Inhibition and Tumor Angiogenesis
- •2. Major Angiogenesis Factors and Receptors
- •2.1. VEGF signaling
- •3. Further Angiogenesis-Related Signaling
- •4. Need for Selectivity of Anti-Angiogenic Kinase Inhibitors
- •5. Kinase Inhibitors in Clinical Development
- •5.1. BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)
- •5.2. PTK/ZK (Vatalanib)
- •5.3. SU11248 (Sunitinib)
- •5.9. BIBF 1120
- •5.10. Chir-258
- •5.12. SU5416 (Semaxinib)
- •6. Challenges and Future Directions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Concepts and Rationales
- •3. Strategy
- •4. Clinical Trials
- •4.1. Growth factor-based, angiogenic approach
- •4.2. Cell therapy-based, vasculogenic and paracrine approach
- •5. Issues Regarding Current Strategy
- •5.1. Choice of biological agent
- •5.2. Pharmacokinetics and delivery mode
- •5.3. Monitoring of neovascularization
- •5.4. Study design
- •6. Emerging Concepts of Therapeutic Angiogenesis
- •6.1. Neovascularization responsiveness
- •6.2. Genetic determination of neovascularization
- •7. Future Prospective
- •8. Summary
- •References
- •1. Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Cardiovascular System
- •2. HGF Signaling in Endothelial Cells
- •3. Angiogenic Therapy for Ischemic Peripheral Arterial Diseases
- •4. Clinical Trial in PAD
- •5. HGF Gene Therapy for Myocardial Ischemia
- •6. HGF Gene Therapy for Restenosis After Angioplasty
- •7. Next Five Years Perspective — Future Direction of HGF Therapy
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Endothelial Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease
- •1.1. Nitric oxide synthases
- •1.2. Physiological role of endothelial NO (“EDNO”)
- •1.3. Endothelial NO-deficiency in cardiovascular diseases
- •1.4. Therapeutic restoration of endothelial NO production in cardiovascular diseases
- •2. Nitric Oxide and Angiogenesis
- •2.2. Tumor angiogenesis and NO
- •2.3. Evidence in cultured endothelial cells and in rabbit cornea
- •2.4. Role of NO in post-ischemic revascularization
- •2.6. Molecular mechanisms
- •3. NOS Gene Transfer
- •3.1. Gene delivery vectors
- •3.2. NOS-III gene transfer
- •3.3. NOS-II gene transfer
- •4.1. Impaired angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in patients with critical limb ischemia
- •4.2.1. NOS-III-KO mice
- •4.2.2. NOS-III transgenic mice
- •4.2.3. Wild-type NOS-III gene transfer in normal rats
- •4.5.1. Plasmid delivery of the NOS1177D gene
- •4.5.2. Adenoviral delivery of the NOS1179D gene
- •6. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Index
NO and Angiogenesis 389
NO production by NOS-III. These include the female sexual steroid hormone, 17β-estradiol;36−38 lipid lowering agents, represented by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (“statins”);39 blood pressure lowering drugs, represented by ACE inhibitors;40 and antioxidants, represented by antioxidant vitamins (e.g. vitamin E and C).41 Some of these treatments lead to clinical efficacy in cardiovascular diseases and evidence have been accumulating for the role of NO as an important contributor to these therapeutic effects.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (TREND = Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction), the ACE inhibitor quinapril have been shown to improve endotheliumdependent relaxation after six months of treatment.42 In another study the effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, lovastatin, was examined in patients with hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease. Benefit on endothelium-dependent relaxation was shown after five and a half months of treatment.43
2. Nitric Oxide and Angiogenesis
2.1.VEGF causes endothelium-dependent vasodilation mediated by EDNO
The endothelial cell-specific vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) increases cytosolic free calcium in cultured endothelial cells.44 In isolated canine coronary artery segments, VEGF causes endotheliumdependent relaxation that can be attenuated by pretreatment with NG- monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA).45 Isner’s group demonstrated the release of NO from arteries after treatment with VEGF46 and extended these studies to demonstrate that VEGF promoted recovery of endothelium-dependent relaxation in ischemic rabbit hindlimb. Subsequent work by the same group showed that VEGF infusion lead to EDNO-mediated hypotension in animals47 as well as in humans.48 The signaling link between VEGF and EDNO release include VEGF/KDR interaction-induced Akt phosphorylation (activation), which in turn phosphorylates NOS-III at Serine 1177, leading to increased NO production (Fig. 1).
390 G. M. Rubanyi
Fig. 1. Current concept of the role of the NOS-III/NO system in angiogenesis. The endothelial cell-specific angiogenic growth factor, VEGF, interacts with its receptor (KDR) on endothelial cells and via several mechanisms stimulates the proliferation, migration and survival of these cells, which ultimately leads to new vessel formation (angiogenesis). An intact NOS-III/NO system is required for these actions of VEGF (and of other growth factors, including FGF and HGF, not shown). NOS-III, localized to the caveolae in endothelial cell plasma membrane is activated by VEGF/KDR interaction via P13K-induced activation (phosphorylation, P) of Akt, which in turn phosphorylates serine 1177 in NOS-III enzyme (NOS-P), which augments EDNO production several-fold (for further details see text).
2.2. Tumor angiogenesis and NO
Indirect evidence that NO may be involved in the angiogenic process was provided by studies evaluating tumor angiogenesis. Increased levels of NO have been reported in human tumors,49,50 and it has been demonstrated that transfection of the inducible NOS (NOS-II) gene into an adenocarcinoma cell line gave rise to more vascularized tumors than the wild-type cells when injected into animals.51 Other experiments using inhibitors of NO synthase also strongly support the importance of NO in xenografted tumor neovascularization.52,53 Ziche and colleagues have demonstrated that vascularization of tumors that have
NO and Angiogenesis 391
been initiated with breast cancer cells overexpressing VEGF can be attenuated by treatment with NO synthase inhibitors.54
2.3. Evidence in cultured endothelial cells and in rabbit cornea
A more direct link between the production of NO induced by VEGF and angiogenesis have been demonstrated by Papapetropoulos et al.55,56 and Morbidelli et al.57 describing that many of the angiogenic responses to VEGF in vitro were associated with increases in cGMP in cultured endothelial cells. Inhibitors of NO synthesis attenuated VEGF-induced angiogenic responses, including cultured endothelial cell proliferation, migration and tube formation.
In vivo evidence for the link between NO and angiogenesis in adult animals was first described by Ziche and co-workers, who demonstrated that, in rabbits, corneal angiogenesis induced by VEGF can be inhibited by treatment of the animals with inhibitors of NO production.15,54
2.4. Role of NO in post-ischemic revascularization
In the rabbit ischemic hindlimb model, dietary L-arginine supplementation significantly decreased blood pressure, reduced arterial resistance, increased flow at rest, and increased flow reserve in the ischemic limb.58 In hypercholesterolemic mice, elevated level of plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of NO synthesis,59 is associated with impaired angiogenic response to ischemia.60 This effect of ADMA can be reversed by administration of the NO precursor L-arginine or mimicked in normal animals by administration of an NO synthase inhibitor.61
Isner’s group was the first to investigate the effects of ischemia on angiogenesis in NOS-III-KO mice.58 The degree of angiogenesis (revascularization) was determined using both laser Doppler imaging in situ and by measuring capillary density. In the NOS-III-KO mice the spontaneous angiogenic response to ischemia was severely attenuated as compared to normal mice. The levels of VEGF were comparable in the ischemic limbs of both the control and NOS-III-KO mice, suggesting that the reason for the attenuated response to ischemia was not the lack of ischemia-induced upregulation of VEGF production. Although
392 G. M. Rubanyi
VEGF gene transfer has already been shown to stimulate the angiogenic response in Apo E-KO mice,62 treatment of NOS-III-KO mice with either a vector carrying the VEGF gene, or injection of recombinant VEGF protein, failed to improve post-ischemic revascularization.58
The ability to restore the effects of ischemia on angiogenesis in the NOS-III-KO mice with a systemically administered NO donor was not successful,58 so a direct proof for the therapeutic benefits of exogenously applied NO on angiogenesis still remained to be demonstrated.
2.5.Role of NO in exogenous VEGF and FGF-induced revascularization
Therapeutic angiogenesis in several animal models of myocardial and hindlimb ischemia have been demonstrated using VEGF and FGF protein or gene delivery. The essential role of NO in exogenous VEGFinduced post-ischemic revascularization have been demonstrated in NOS-III-KO mice.58 In a rat hindlimb ischemia model, treatment with both VEGF and FGF significantly augmented post-ischemic revascularization. Pretreatment with L-NAME prevented therapeutic arteriogenesis in this rat model by exogenous VEGF-121 and FGF-2 protein treatment63 or by exercise training,64 indicating that impaired EDNO production can reduce angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in response to both exogenously administered VEGF and FGF.
2.6. Molecular mechanisms
A number of studies indicate that NO is an endothelial cell survival factor, inhibiting apoptosis.65−67 Under certain experimental conditions NO enhances endothelial cell proliferation.57 Another prerequisite for the formation of new vessels is migration of endothelial cells. NO is known to enhance endothelial migration, by stimulating endothelial cell podokinesis,68 and/or by enhancing the expression of avβ3, an endothelial integrin involved in attachment and migration.69 Migration of endothelial cells also requires the dissolution of the surrounding extracellular matrix. NO may contribute to this process by increasing the production of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA).70 Finally, the hemodynamic effects of this potent vasodilator may play a role in
