- •CONTENTS
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •I Components of Angiogenic Cascades
- •1. Introduction and Historical Perspective
- •2. The Semaphorins
- •3. The Plexin Receptor Family
- •4. The Neuropilins
- •5. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors
- •6. Signal Transduction by Neuropilins
- •7. The Role of the Neuropilins in the Regulation of Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis
- •8. Modulation of Angiogenesis by Semaphorins that Bind Directly to Plexins
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Eph receptor domain structure
- •1.2. The ephrin domain structure
- •2. Effects on Vascular Cell Behavior and Signaling Pathways
- •2.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •2.2. Ephrin-A1 and EphA4
- •2.3. Ephrin-B and EphB
- •2.3.1. EphB forward signaling
- •2.3.2. Ephrin-B reverse signaling
- •2.4. Crosstalk with other angiogenic pathways
- •3. Endothelial Cell Fate
- •4. Angiogenic Remodeling of Embryonic Blood Vessels
- •4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA receptors
- •4.2. EphB4 and Ephrin-B2
- •4.3. Other EphB receptors and Ephrin-Bs
- •5. Lymphatic Vessels
- •6. Adult Vasculature
- •6.1. Quiescent vasculature
- •6.2. Physiological angiogenesis
- •6.3. Inflammation and wound healing
- •6.4. Tumor angiogenesis
- •6.4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •6.4.2. Ephrin-B2 and EphB4
- •8. Perspectives
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Molecular Mechanisms
- •3. Role in Vascular Development
- •4. FGFs in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •5. Role of FGFs in Developmental and Tumor Lymphangiogenesis
- •7. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. The NPY System
- •2. NPY as a Growth Factor for Vascular Cells
- •3. DPPIV: A Molecular Switch of the NPY Angiogenic System
- •4. Downstream Mediators of NPY Actions
- •5. NPY in Revascularization of Ischemic Tissues
- •6. NPY in Wound Healing
- •7. NPY in Adipose Tissue Growth and Obesity
- •8. NPY in Retinopathy
- •10. NPY in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •11. NPY-Mediated Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Historical Perspective
- •3.1. The HSPG core proteins
- •3.2. The structure of the HS chain
- •3.3. The biosynthesis of HS
- •3.4. The post-synthetic processing of HSPGs
- •4. Evolution of HSPGs
- •5. HSPGs in Development
- •6. HSPG Modulation of Ligand-Receptor Interactions
- •6.2. HSPG co-receptors confer unique regulatory properties
- •6.2.1. Co-receptors engender stoichiometric control of signaling
- •6.2.2. The effects of glycanation
- •6.2.3. HS sequence motifs regulate signaling
- •7. HSPGs Enable Global Control of EC Phenotype
- •8. Future Therapeutic Directions
- •9. Conclusions
- •References
- •II Angiogenic Regulators
- •1. Introduction: Blood Vessels and Nerves Use Similar Guidance Cues
- •2. Semaphorin Signaling
- •2.1. Neuropilins
- •2.2. Plexins
- •3. Ephrins and Eph Signaling
- •3.1. Forward signaling
- •3.2. Reverse signaling
- •4. Netrin and Slit Signaling
- •5. Open Questions
- •References
- •1. Oxygen Homeostasis: Phylogeny, Ontogeny, Physiology, and Pathobiology
- •5. Control of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis by HIF-1
- •6. Control of Tumor Angiogenesis by HIF-1
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Vasculature
- •3. ROS and Angiogenesis
- •4. NAD(P)H Oxidase: A Major Source of ROS in the Vasculature
- •5. Role of NAD(P)H Oxidase in Angiogenesis
- •6. ROS as Signaling Molecules in Angiogenesis
- •8. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Assessing Coronary Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis
- •3. Pressure Overload-Induced Hypertrophy
- •4. Volume Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
- •5. Thyroxine-Induced Hypertrophy
- •6. Hypoxia-Induced Hypertrophy
- •7. Exercise-Induced Hypertrophy
- •8. Myocardial Infarction-Induced Hypertrophy
- •9. Modulators of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •10. Stimuli of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •11. Summary
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Coronary Resistance
- •3. Regulation of Coronary Microvascular Tone
- •3.1. Intrinsic and extrinsic vasomotor control
- •3.2. Role of the endothelium
- •3.3. Role of metabolism and autoregulation
- •3.4. Flow-induced dilation
- •3.5. Neurohumoral influence on microcirculation
- •3.6. Intrinsic myogenic tone
- •3.7. Impact of extravascular and humoral factors on the coronary microcirculation
- •3.8. Role of venules in coronary resistance
- •4. Endothelial Factors in Vascular Growth and Response to Injury
- •5. Impact of Disease States on Coronary Circulation
- •6. The Coronary Microcirculation in Hypertophic States
- •7. Summary
- •References
- •III Clinical Applications
- •1. Kinase Inhibition and Tumor Angiogenesis
- •2. Major Angiogenesis Factors and Receptors
- •2.1. VEGF signaling
- •3. Further Angiogenesis-Related Signaling
- •4. Need for Selectivity of Anti-Angiogenic Kinase Inhibitors
- •5. Kinase Inhibitors in Clinical Development
- •5.1. BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)
- •5.2. PTK/ZK (Vatalanib)
- •5.3. SU11248 (Sunitinib)
- •5.9. BIBF 1120
- •5.10. Chir-258
- •5.12. SU5416 (Semaxinib)
- •6. Challenges and Future Directions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Concepts and Rationales
- •3. Strategy
- •4. Clinical Trials
- •4.1. Growth factor-based, angiogenic approach
- •4.2. Cell therapy-based, vasculogenic and paracrine approach
- •5. Issues Regarding Current Strategy
- •5.1. Choice of biological agent
- •5.2. Pharmacokinetics and delivery mode
- •5.3. Monitoring of neovascularization
- •5.4. Study design
- •6. Emerging Concepts of Therapeutic Angiogenesis
- •6.1. Neovascularization responsiveness
- •6.2. Genetic determination of neovascularization
- •7. Future Prospective
- •8. Summary
- •References
- •1. Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Cardiovascular System
- •2. HGF Signaling in Endothelial Cells
- •3. Angiogenic Therapy for Ischemic Peripheral Arterial Diseases
- •4. Clinical Trial in PAD
- •5. HGF Gene Therapy for Myocardial Ischemia
- •6. HGF Gene Therapy for Restenosis After Angioplasty
- •7. Next Five Years Perspective — Future Direction of HGF Therapy
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Endothelial Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease
- •1.1. Nitric oxide synthases
- •1.2. Physiological role of endothelial NO (“EDNO”)
- •1.3. Endothelial NO-deficiency in cardiovascular diseases
- •1.4. Therapeutic restoration of endothelial NO production in cardiovascular diseases
- •2. Nitric Oxide and Angiogenesis
- •2.2. Tumor angiogenesis and NO
- •2.3. Evidence in cultured endothelial cells and in rabbit cornea
- •2.4. Role of NO in post-ischemic revascularization
- •2.6. Molecular mechanisms
- •3. NOS Gene Transfer
- •3.1. Gene delivery vectors
- •3.2. NOS-III gene transfer
- •3.3. NOS-II gene transfer
- •4.1. Impaired angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in patients with critical limb ischemia
- •4.2.1. NOS-III-KO mice
- •4.2.2. NOS-III transgenic mice
- •4.2.3. Wild-type NOS-III gene transfer in normal rats
- •4.5.1. Plasmid delivery of the NOS1177D gene
- •4.5.2. Adenoviral delivery of the NOS1179D gene
- •6. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Index
Hepatocyte Growth Factor |
371 |
follows an inexorable downhill course and there is no optimal medical therapy for critical limb ischemia, as the Consensus Document of the European Working Group on Critical Limb Ischemia concluded. Therefore novel therapeutics are required to treat these patients. In the presence of obstruction of a major artery, blood flow to the ischemic tissue is often dependent on collateral vessels. When spontaneous development of collateral vessels is insufficient to allow normal perfusion of the tissue at risk, residual ischemia occurs. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that angiogenic growth factors can stimulate the development of collateral arteries,18−22 a concept called therapeutic angiogenesis.
As intra-arterial administration of recombinant HGF protein induced angiogenesis in a rabbit hindlimb ischemia model,23 the feasibility of gene therapy using HGF rather than recombinant protein therapy was examined to treat peripheral arterial disease. Intramuscular injection of a “naked” human HGF plasmid resulted in a significant increase in blood flow and capillary density in mice, rat and rabbit models of hind limb ischemia. Importantly, the degree of angiogenesis induced by transfection of HGF plasmid was significantly greater than that caused by a single injection of recombinant HGF protein. Angiogenic property of HGF was also demonstrated in high risk conditions such as diabetes mellitus and high Lp(a) concentration models.24−28 One may assume that overexpression of an angiogenic growth factor can enhance tumor growth. To resolve this issue, we examined the overexpression of HGF in tumor-bearing mice. Tumor growth was initiated with an intradermal inoculation of A431, human epidermoid cancer cells expressing c-met. The mice were then intramuscularly injected with a human HGF or control plasmid into the femoral muscle. Analysis of human HGF expression noted increased concentration only in the injected femoral muscle, but not in blood. Although recombinant HGF stimulated the growth of A431 cells in vitro, no effect on tumor growth was detected in these mice.29
4. Clinical Trial in PAD
With this preclinical HGF data in hand, we investigated the safety and efficiency of HGF plasmid DNA transfection in patients with critical
372 R. Morishita & T. Ogihara
limb ischemia in an open-labeled phase I clinical trial.30 Patients could be enrolled if they (1) had chronic critical limb ischemia, including rest pain or non-healing ischemic ulcers, for a minimum of four weeks;
(2) were resistant to conventional drug therapy at least for more than four weeks after hospitalization; (3) were not candidates for surgical or percutaneous revascularization based on usual practice standards;
(4) did not have cancer or a history of cancer; and (5) did not have severe unstable retinopathy. Objective documentation of ischemia, included a resting ankle brachial index (ABI) of less that 0.6 in the affected limb on two consecutive examinations performed one week apart. Patients were observed for four weeks under conventional therapy to confirm that their clinical symptoms and objective parameters were not improved.
Intramuscular injection of the naked HGF plasmid DNA was performed in ischemic limbs of 22 patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans or Buerger disease graded as Fontaine III or IV. The primary endpoints were safety and improvement of ischemic symptoms at 12 weeks after transfection. Throughout the gene therapy periods, there were no signs of systemic or local inflammatory reactions. No serious side-effects related to gene therapy were seen. To date, development of tumors or progression of diabetic retinopathy has not been observed in any patient transfected with HGF plasmid DNA during the trial. Two-month follow-up studies showed no evidence of the development of neoplasm or hemangioma. In addition, no significant increase in serum HGF concentration was observed throughout the gene therapy periods.
The preliminary evaluation of initial six patients demonstrated beneficial effects of HGF gene therapy.30 Although ABI could not be measured in one patient because of uncompressible severely calcified vessels, ABI was significantly increased from 0.426 ± 0.046 (n = 5) at baseline (before administration) to 0.626 ± 0.071 (P = 0.0155; n = 5) at 4 weeks after the second injection, and to 0.596 ± 0.046 (P = 0.0360; n = 5) at eight weeks after the second injection. Increase in ankle pressure index more than 0.1 was observed in five of five patients. In addition, the change in transcutaneous PO2 (TcPO2) after O2 stimulation was significantly increased at eight weeks compared with baseline (P < 0.05). To evaluate the effects of HGF gene therapy on clinical symptoms,
Hepatocyte Growth Factor |
373 |
we used the change in the ischemic ulcer and visual analogue scale. In this trial, a total of 11 ischemic ulcers were found in four patients. Two of 11 ulcers completely disappeared. Considering an improvement of ischemic ulcers of more than 25% to be evaluated as positive, eight of 11 ulcers (72%) improved. Three of four patients demonstrated an improvement of the maximum ischemic ulcer diameter of > 25% (efficacy rate = 75%). Also, we evaluated resting pain using a visual analog scale, a standard method for the evaluation of pain, where 0.0 cm means “pain free” or no pain, and 10 cm means more severe pain. Pain was significantly improved in a time-dependent manner. Thus, on the basis of this small trial, it appeared that intramuscular injection of naked HGF plasmid is safe, feasible, and can achieve successful improvement of ischemic limbs. It is noteworthy that no edema has been observed in this trial, although transient lower-extremity edema was reported with clinical gene therapy using the VEGF gene because of an increase in vascular permeability.
One of the distinguishing features of HGF is that it stimulates the migration of VSMC without stimulating their replication.31 As shown in Fig. 4a, the initial event in angiogenesis induced by VEGF is the migration of endothelial cells, leading to the sprouting of blood vessels. Later, the migration of VSMC occurs due to the release of PDGF. However, a delay in the maturation of blood vessels may exist in the case of angiogenesis induced by VEGF. In contrast, HGF simultaneously stimulated the migration of both endothelial cells and VSMC (Fig. 4b). Thus, the blood vessels may mature at an earlier time point, thereby avoiding the release of blood-derived cells into the extracellular space, although further studies may be necessary to examine the angiogenic properties among various angiogenic growth factors including HGF, VEGF and FGF. Although these trials have not been finished, the feasibility of gene therapy using angiogenic growth factors to treat peripheral arterial disease seems to be the realm in the near future.
Clinical studies of alternative dosing regiments of gene therapy with randomized placebo-controlled trials were designed. Currently, phase III double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled studies in Japan and phase II studies in USA32 are ongoing.
374 R. Morishita & T. Ogihara
(a) |
VEGF |
Migration/proliferation |
|
||
|
|
of endothelial cells |
sprouting
Maturation of blood vessels
Inmatured blood vessels
edema
Migration
of VSMC
(b) |
HGF |
Migration/proliferation |
|
||
|
|
of endothelial cells |
sprouting
Degradation of matrix
Migration of VSMC
|
No edema |
|
|
Maturation of blood vessels |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 4. Model of collateral formation induced by VEGF (a) and HGF (b). HGF stimulated the growth and migration of endothelial cells together with the migration, but not proliferation, of VSMC through c-met. In contrast, VEGF only stimulated the growth and migration of endothelial cells without the migration or proliferation of VSMC, due to lack of VEGF receptors in VSMC.
