- •CONTENTS
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •I Components of Angiogenic Cascades
- •1. Introduction and Historical Perspective
- •2. The Semaphorins
- •3. The Plexin Receptor Family
- •4. The Neuropilins
- •5. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors
- •6. Signal Transduction by Neuropilins
- •7. The Role of the Neuropilins in the Regulation of Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis
- •8. Modulation of Angiogenesis by Semaphorins that Bind Directly to Plexins
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Eph receptor domain structure
- •1.2. The ephrin domain structure
- •2. Effects on Vascular Cell Behavior and Signaling Pathways
- •2.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •2.2. Ephrin-A1 and EphA4
- •2.3. Ephrin-B and EphB
- •2.3.1. EphB forward signaling
- •2.3.2. Ephrin-B reverse signaling
- •2.4. Crosstalk with other angiogenic pathways
- •3. Endothelial Cell Fate
- •4. Angiogenic Remodeling of Embryonic Blood Vessels
- •4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA receptors
- •4.2. EphB4 and Ephrin-B2
- •4.3. Other EphB receptors and Ephrin-Bs
- •5. Lymphatic Vessels
- •6. Adult Vasculature
- •6.1. Quiescent vasculature
- •6.2. Physiological angiogenesis
- •6.3. Inflammation and wound healing
- •6.4. Tumor angiogenesis
- •6.4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •6.4.2. Ephrin-B2 and EphB4
- •8. Perspectives
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Molecular Mechanisms
- •3. Role in Vascular Development
- •4. FGFs in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •5. Role of FGFs in Developmental and Tumor Lymphangiogenesis
- •7. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. The NPY System
- •2. NPY as a Growth Factor for Vascular Cells
- •3. DPPIV: A Molecular Switch of the NPY Angiogenic System
- •4. Downstream Mediators of NPY Actions
- •5. NPY in Revascularization of Ischemic Tissues
- •6. NPY in Wound Healing
- •7. NPY in Adipose Tissue Growth and Obesity
- •8. NPY in Retinopathy
- •10. NPY in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •11. NPY-Mediated Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Historical Perspective
- •3.1. The HSPG core proteins
- •3.2. The structure of the HS chain
- •3.3. The biosynthesis of HS
- •3.4. The post-synthetic processing of HSPGs
- •4. Evolution of HSPGs
- •5. HSPGs in Development
- •6. HSPG Modulation of Ligand-Receptor Interactions
- •6.2. HSPG co-receptors confer unique regulatory properties
- •6.2.1. Co-receptors engender stoichiometric control of signaling
- •6.2.2. The effects of glycanation
- •6.2.3. HS sequence motifs regulate signaling
- •7. HSPGs Enable Global Control of EC Phenotype
- •8. Future Therapeutic Directions
- •9. Conclusions
- •References
- •II Angiogenic Regulators
- •1. Introduction: Blood Vessels and Nerves Use Similar Guidance Cues
- •2. Semaphorin Signaling
- •2.1. Neuropilins
- •2.2. Plexins
- •3. Ephrins and Eph Signaling
- •3.1. Forward signaling
- •3.2. Reverse signaling
- •4. Netrin and Slit Signaling
- •5. Open Questions
- •References
- •1. Oxygen Homeostasis: Phylogeny, Ontogeny, Physiology, and Pathobiology
- •5. Control of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis by HIF-1
- •6. Control of Tumor Angiogenesis by HIF-1
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Vasculature
- •3. ROS and Angiogenesis
- •4. NAD(P)H Oxidase: A Major Source of ROS in the Vasculature
- •5. Role of NAD(P)H Oxidase in Angiogenesis
- •6. ROS as Signaling Molecules in Angiogenesis
- •8. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Assessing Coronary Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis
- •3. Pressure Overload-Induced Hypertrophy
- •4. Volume Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
- •5. Thyroxine-Induced Hypertrophy
- •6. Hypoxia-Induced Hypertrophy
- •7. Exercise-Induced Hypertrophy
- •8. Myocardial Infarction-Induced Hypertrophy
- •9. Modulators of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •10. Stimuli of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •11. Summary
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Coronary Resistance
- •3. Regulation of Coronary Microvascular Tone
- •3.1. Intrinsic and extrinsic vasomotor control
- •3.2. Role of the endothelium
- •3.3. Role of metabolism and autoregulation
- •3.4. Flow-induced dilation
- •3.5. Neurohumoral influence on microcirculation
- •3.6. Intrinsic myogenic tone
- •3.7. Impact of extravascular and humoral factors on the coronary microcirculation
- •3.8. Role of venules in coronary resistance
- •4. Endothelial Factors in Vascular Growth and Response to Injury
- •5. Impact of Disease States on Coronary Circulation
- •6. The Coronary Microcirculation in Hypertophic States
- •7. Summary
- •References
- •III Clinical Applications
- •1. Kinase Inhibition and Tumor Angiogenesis
- •2. Major Angiogenesis Factors and Receptors
- •2.1. VEGF signaling
- •3. Further Angiogenesis-Related Signaling
- •4. Need for Selectivity of Anti-Angiogenic Kinase Inhibitors
- •5. Kinase Inhibitors in Clinical Development
- •5.1. BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)
- •5.2. PTK/ZK (Vatalanib)
- •5.3. SU11248 (Sunitinib)
- •5.9. BIBF 1120
- •5.10. Chir-258
- •5.12. SU5416 (Semaxinib)
- •6. Challenges and Future Directions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Concepts and Rationales
- •3. Strategy
- •4. Clinical Trials
- •4.1. Growth factor-based, angiogenic approach
- •4.2. Cell therapy-based, vasculogenic and paracrine approach
- •5. Issues Regarding Current Strategy
- •5.1. Choice of biological agent
- •5.2. Pharmacokinetics and delivery mode
- •5.3. Monitoring of neovascularization
- •5.4. Study design
- •6. Emerging Concepts of Therapeutic Angiogenesis
- •6.1. Neovascularization responsiveness
- •6.2. Genetic determination of neovascularization
- •7. Future Prospective
- •8. Summary
- •References
- •1. Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Cardiovascular System
- •2. HGF Signaling in Endothelial Cells
- •3. Angiogenic Therapy for Ischemic Peripheral Arterial Diseases
- •4. Clinical Trial in PAD
- •5. HGF Gene Therapy for Myocardial Ischemia
- •6. HGF Gene Therapy for Restenosis After Angioplasty
- •7. Next Five Years Perspective — Future Direction of HGF Therapy
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Endothelial Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease
- •1.1. Nitric oxide synthases
- •1.2. Physiological role of endothelial NO (“EDNO”)
- •1.3. Endothelial NO-deficiency in cardiovascular diseases
- •1.4. Therapeutic restoration of endothelial NO production in cardiovascular diseases
- •2. Nitric Oxide and Angiogenesis
- •2.2. Tumor angiogenesis and NO
- •2.3. Evidence in cultured endothelial cells and in rabbit cornea
- •2.4. Role of NO in post-ischemic revascularization
- •2.6. Molecular mechanisms
- •3. NOS Gene Transfer
- •3.1. Gene delivery vectors
- •3.2. NOS-III gene transfer
- •3.3. NOS-II gene transfer
- •4.1. Impaired angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in patients with critical limb ischemia
- •4.2.1. NOS-III-KO mice
- •4.2.2. NOS-III transgenic mice
- •4.2.3. Wild-type NOS-III gene transfer in normal rats
- •4.5.1. Plasmid delivery of the NOS1177D gene
- •4.5.2. Adenoviral delivery of the NOS1179D gene
- •6. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Index
6G. Neufeld et al.
Fig. 2. The plexin receptor family. There are currently nine known mammalian members of this family. They are grouped into four subfamilies. Members of the A, B and D subfamilies have been found to function as modulators of angiogenesis. All plexins contain a sema domain and MET-related sequences. The intracellular part contains tyrosine residues that can be phosphorylated but lack tyrosine-kinase activity.
activating Rho signaling promoting the collapse of growing growth cones.41,42 Plexin-B1 has a PDZ binding motif at the c-terminal and binds the guanine nucleotide exchange (GEF) factors PDZ_Rho-GEF and LARG.43,44 The GTPase activating protein (GAP)-like functional domain of plexin-B1 also contains a binding site for the small GTPase Rnd-1, and directly regulates the activity of R-Ras when Rnd-1 and s4d are bound to plexin-B1 via activation of the intrinsic GTPase activity of R-Ras.32,45
4. The Neuropilins
Unlike most of the semaphorins which bind directly to plexins, most class-3 semaphorins have been found to bind to the receptors belonging
Semaphorins, Plexins and Neuropilins |
7 |
to the neuropilin family, and to induce signal transduction as a result of this interaction. The human and mouse neuropilin family consists of two genes, np1 and np2. The proteins encoded by these two genes are membrane-bound receptors, although soluble splice forms of np1 and np2 have been reported.46,47 The two neuropilins share a very similar domain structure although the overall homology between np1 and np2 is only 44% at the amino acid level.48 Both neuropilins contain two complement binding (CUB)-like domains (a1 and a2 domains), two coagulation factor V/VIII homology-like domains (b1 and b2 domains), and a meprin (MAM) domain thought to be important for neuropilin dimerization and possibly for the interaction of neuropilins with other membrane receptors9,48 (Fig. 3). Various class-3 semaphorins differentiate between the two neuropilins. Thus s3a binds to np1 but not to np2, while s3f binds to np2 and with a much reduced affinity to np1.9,10,48 The binding site of s3a in np1 covers part of the second a-domain and
Fig. 3. The neuropilin receptor family. The two members of the neuropilin family are membrane anchored receptors containing very short intracellular domains. Interestingly, np2 has a splice form in which the transmembrane and intracellular domains are completely different. The s3a binding domain of np1 is located between the a2 and b1 domains and overlaps partially the VEGF165 binding domain. The MAM domain is required for receptor dimerization and for interaction with other receptors.
8G. Neufeld et al.
part of the first b-domain. The VEGF binding domain of np1 was mapped following the identification of the VEGF binding properties of the neuropilins. It was found that the VEGF binding site partially overlaps the s3a binding site so that VEGF and s3a compete for binding to np1.49 Interestingly, it was possible to introduce mutations into the ligand binding domain of np1 which resulted in the complete nullification of the VEGF binding ability, but did not compromise the binding of s3a to np1, indicating that the binding domains of VEGF and s3a overlap but are not identical.49 In contrast, the binding of s3f to np2 is not inhibited by VEGF165 indicating that the binding sites of s3f and VEGF on np2 are independent.50 The last three amino-acids of np1 contain a SEA sequence which functions as a docking site for the PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain containing protein NIP, also known as RGS–GAIP-interacting protein (GIPC) and synectin.51 Therefore, although repulsion of np1 expressing growth cones does not require the presence of the intracellular domain of np1,52 it may yet turn out to be required for additional np1 functions. This notion is also supported by the identification of an np2 splice form in which the c-terminal domain (including also the transmembrane domain) is completely exchanged to yield np2b (Fig. 3).53 It is unknown whether these two np2 forms have different biological functions, but their mere existence indicates that the intracellular domains of the neuropilins, although short, are likely to possess functions which have yet to be discovered.
5. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (also known as VEGF- A) is considered to be a major angiogenic factor that plays an essential role in embryonic vasculogenesis and angiogenesis as well as in tumor angiogenesis.54 Multiple forms of VEGF are produced as a result of alternative splicing (Fig. 4), but three of these forms, VEGF121, VEGF165, and VEGF189 are considered to be the major forms that are most frequently encountered. All the VEGF forms bind and activate the VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase receptor which seems to be essential for the transmission of VEGF-induced angiogenic signals.55,56 The VEGFR-1 tyrosine kinase receptor57 and its soluble form58 which also binds all
Semaphorins, Plexins and Neuropilins |
9 |
Fig. 4. The VEGF splice forms and their interaction with VEGF receptors. Shown are the various splice forms of VEGF. The active forms of the various VEGF forms are disulfide-linked homodimers. Exons 1–5 are contained in all splice forms and contain the domains that enable VEGF to bind to the VEGFR-1 (R1) and VEGFR-2 (R2) tyrosine-kinase receptors. The presence of the heparin binding peptide encoded by exon-7 enables binding to np1 and np2 while the heparin binding peptide encoded by exon-6 enables binding to np2 but not to np1. In VEGF165b exon-8 is exchanged with exon-9 turning this VEGF form into an inhibitory molecule. There are several longer VEGF forms that are synthesized from alternative CUG translation initiation sites. Their function is unclear at the moment and they encode non-secreted forms. Stars designate the most commonly encountered splice forms.
the VEGF forms are also required for developmental angiogenesis.59 However, the role of VEGFR-1 in developmental angiogenesis had been considered to be primarily an inhibitory role until recently, because of experiments that demonstrated that the intracellular part of VEGFR-1 is not required for correct vascular development.60 Nevertheless, recent experiments employing VEGFR-1 function blocking antibodies indicate that contrary to previous assumptions, this receptor also plays an important active role in VEGF-induced angiogenesis, presumably as a recruiter of bone marrow derived precursor cells to sites of active angiogenesis.61
10 G. Neufeld et al.
Several VEGF splice forms are produced from the single VEGF gene. These VEGF splice forms usually differ with respect to the expression of exons-6 and -7 of the VEGF gene. Exons-6 and -7 encode independent heparin binding domains that are incorporated into the longer VEGF forms. In contrast, the shortest VEGF splice form, VEGF121, lacks exons-6 and -7 altogether and does not bind to heparin. Research aiming to characterize differences between the VEGF splice forms lead to the identification of splice form-specific VEGF receptors in endothelial cells.1 These receptors turned out to be the neuropilins.2 It was found that the heparin binding domains contained in exons-6 and -7 of the VEGF gene also allow VEGF forms that contain these exons to bind to neuropilin receptors. Thus VEGF121 does not normally bind to neuropilins (although it is able to bind to np2 in the presence of the VEGFR-1 receptor50). In contrast VEGF165, which contains the peptide encoded by exon 7 binds to np1 and to np2 while VEGF145, a VEGF form that contains exon-6 but not -7, binds to np2 but not to np1.2,3,62 Recent evidence indicates that these VEGF splice forms possess somewhat different biological properties. Mice expressing VEGF164 exclusively (in mice all VEGF forms are one amino acid shorter than human VEGF) appear to develop normally, while mice that express only VEGF120 or only VEGF188 do not.63−65 These differences are attributed in part to differences in heparan-sulfate binding ability which result in different diffusion rates of these VEGF forms in the heparan-sulfate rich extracellular matrix, but may also be attributed in part to the differential neuropilin binding properties of the different VEGF forms.
The VEGF family contains four additional angiogenesis promoting members. These are the angiogenic factors PlGF and VEGF-B and the lymphangiogenesis promoting agents VEGF-C and VEGF-D.66 VEGF-C and VEGF-D bind to the VEGFR-2 receptor and induce angiogenesis, but in contrast to VEGF both factors do not bind to VEGFR-1.67 However, both VEGF-C and VEGF-D bind in addition to the third member of the VEGF tyrosine-kinase receptor subfamily, VEGFR-3,68,69 which is primarily expressed on lymphatic endothelial cells, enabling them to induce proliferation of lymphatic endothelial cells and lymphangiogenesis.70−72 It was shown that VEGF-C binds to np2, which is highly expressed in lymphatics,6,73 but the role of np2 in VEGF-C signal transduction is unclear.
