- •CONTENTS
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •I Components of Angiogenic Cascades
- •1. Introduction and Historical Perspective
- •2. The Semaphorins
- •3. The Plexin Receptor Family
- •4. The Neuropilins
- •5. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors
- •6. Signal Transduction by Neuropilins
- •7. The Role of the Neuropilins in the Regulation of Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis
- •8. Modulation of Angiogenesis by Semaphorins that Bind Directly to Plexins
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Eph receptor domain structure
- •1.2. The ephrin domain structure
- •2. Effects on Vascular Cell Behavior and Signaling Pathways
- •2.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •2.2. Ephrin-A1 and EphA4
- •2.3. Ephrin-B and EphB
- •2.3.1. EphB forward signaling
- •2.3.2. Ephrin-B reverse signaling
- •2.4. Crosstalk with other angiogenic pathways
- •3. Endothelial Cell Fate
- •4. Angiogenic Remodeling of Embryonic Blood Vessels
- •4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA receptors
- •4.2. EphB4 and Ephrin-B2
- •4.3. Other EphB receptors and Ephrin-Bs
- •5. Lymphatic Vessels
- •6. Adult Vasculature
- •6.1. Quiescent vasculature
- •6.2. Physiological angiogenesis
- •6.3. Inflammation and wound healing
- •6.4. Tumor angiogenesis
- •6.4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •6.4.2. Ephrin-B2 and EphB4
- •8. Perspectives
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Molecular Mechanisms
- •3. Role in Vascular Development
- •4. FGFs in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •5. Role of FGFs in Developmental and Tumor Lymphangiogenesis
- •7. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. The NPY System
- •2. NPY as a Growth Factor for Vascular Cells
- •3. DPPIV: A Molecular Switch of the NPY Angiogenic System
- •4. Downstream Mediators of NPY Actions
- •5. NPY in Revascularization of Ischemic Tissues
- •6. NPY in Wound Healing
- •7. NPY in Adipose Tissue Growth and Obesity
- •8. NPY in Retinopathy
- •10. NPY in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •11. NPY-Mediated Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Historical Perspective
- •3.1. The HSPG core proteins
- •3.2. The structure of the HS chain
- •3.3. The biosynthesis of HS
- •3.4. The post-synthetic processing of HSPGs
- •4. Evolution of HSPGs
- •5. HSPGs in Development
- •6. HSPG Modulation of Ligand-Receptor Interactions
- •6.2. HSPG co-receptors confer unique regulatory properties
- •6.2.1. Co-receptors engender stoichiometric control of signaling
- •6.2.2. The effects of glycanation
- •6.2.3. HS sequence motifs regulate signaling
- •7. HSPGs Enable Global Control of EC Phenotype
- •8. Future Therapeutic Directions
- •9. Conclusions
- •References
- •II Angiogenic Regulators
- •1. Introduction: Blood Vessels and Nerves Use Similar Guidance Cues
- •2. Semaphorin Signaling
- •2.1. Neuropilins
- •2.2. Plexins
- •3. Ephrins and Eph Signaling
- •3.1. Forward signaling
- •3.2. Reverse signaling
- •4. Netrin and Slit Signaling
- •5. Open Questions
- •References
- •1. Oxygen Homeostasis: Phylogeny, Ontogeny, Physiology, and Pathobiology
- •5. Control of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis by HIF-1
- •6. Control of Tumor Angiogenesis by HIF-1
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Vasculature
- •3. ROS and Angiogenesis
- •4. NAD(P)H Oxidase: A Major Source of ROS in the Vasculature
- •5. Role of NAD(P)H Oxidase in Angiogenesis
- •6. ROS as Signaling Molecules in Angiogenesis
- •8. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Assessing Coronary Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis
- •3. Pressure Overload-Induced Hypertrophy
- •4. Volume Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
- •5. Thyroxine-Induced Hypertrophy
- •6. Hypoxia-Induced Hypertrophy
- •7. Exercise-Induced Hypertrophy
- •8. Myocardial Infarction-Induced Hypertrophy
- •9. Modulators of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •10. Stimuli of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •11. Summary
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Coronary Resistance
- •3. Regulation of Coronary Microvascular Tone
- •3.1. Intrinsic and extrinsic vasomotor control
- •3.2. Role of the endothelium
- •3.3. Role of metabolism and autoregulation
- •3.4. Flow-induced dilation
- •3.5. Neurohumoral influence on microcirculation
- •3.6. Intrinsic myogenic tone
- •3.7. Impact of extravascular and humoral factors on the coronary microcirculation
- •3.8. Role of venules in coronary resistance
- •4. Endothelial Factors in Vascular Growth and Response to Injury
- •5. Impact of Disease States on Coronary Circulation
- •6. The Coronary Microcirculation in Hypertophic States
- •7. Summary
- •References
- •III Clinical Applications
- •1. Kinase Inhibition and Tumor Angiogenesis
- •2. Major Angiogenesis Factors and Receptors
- •2.1. VEGF signaling
- •3. Further Angiogenesis-Related Signaling
- •4. Need for Selectivity of Anti-Angiogenic Kinase Inhibitors
- •5. Kinase Inhibitors in Clinical Development
- •5.1. BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)
- •5.2. PTK/ZK (Vatalanib)
- •5.3. SU11248 (Sunitinib)
- •5.9. BIBF 1120
- •5.10. Chir-258
- •5.12. SU5416 (Semaxinib)
- •6. Challenges and Future Directions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Concepts and Rationales
- •3. Strategy
- •4. Clinical Trials
- •4.1. Growth factor-based, angiogenic approach
- •4.2. Cell therapy-based, vasculogenic and paracrine approach
- •5. Issues Regarding Current Strategy
- •5.1. Choice of biological agent
- •5.2. Pharmacokinetics and delivery mode
- •5.3. Monitoring of neovascularization
- •5.4. Study design
- •6. Emerging Concepts of Therapeutic Angiogenesis
- •6.1. Neovascularization responsiveness
- •6.2. Genetic determination of neovascularization
- •7. Future Prospective
- •8. Summary
- •References
- •1. Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Cardiovascular System
- •2. HGF Signaling in Endothelial Cells
- •3. Angiogenic Therapy for Ischemic Peripheral Arterial Diseases
- •4. Clinical Trial in PAD
- •5. HGF Gene Therapy for Myocardial Ischemia
- •6. HGF Gene Therapy for Restenosis After Angioplasty
- •7. Next Five Years Perspective — Future Direction of HGF Therapy
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Endothelial Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease
- •1.1. Nitric oxide synthases
- •1.2. Physiological role of endothelial NO (“EDNO”)
- •1.3. Endothelial NO-deficiency in cardiovascular diseases
- •1.4. Therapeutic restoration of endothelial NO production in cardiovascular diseases
- •2. Nitric Oxide and Angiogenesis
- •2.2. Tumor angiogenesis and NO
- •2.3. Evidence in cultured endothelial cells and in rabbit cornea
- •2.4. Role of NO in post-ischemic revascularization
- •2.6. Molecular mechanisms
- •3. NOS Gene Transfer
- •3.1. Gene delivery vectors
- •3.2. NOS-III gene transfer
- •3.3. NOS-II gene transfer
- •4.1. Impaired angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in patients with critical limb ischemia
- •4.2.1. NOS-III-KO mice
- •4.2.2. NOS-III transgenic mice
- •4.2.3. Wild-type NOS-III gene transfer in normal rats
- •4.5.1. Plasmid delivery of the NOS1177D gene
- •4.5.2. Adenoviral delivery of the NOS1179D gene
- •6. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Index
56 E. B. Pasquale
vessels.14 EphA Fc fusion proteins also inhibit the formation of premalignant lesions and reduce tumor volume in the RIP-Tag transgenic mouse pancreatic cancer model.48 Furthermore, tumor growth is impaired and vascular density is decreased when mouse 4T1 mammary adenocarcinoma cells are implanted in EphA2 knockout mice, demonstrating the importance of EphA2 in tumor blood vessels and the tumor microenvironment.56 Taken together, the available evidence suggests that EphA2 forward signaling in tumor blood vessels is critical for tumor growth and that inhibition of endothelial EphA2 forward signaling is the main mechanism underlying the anticancer effects of EphA receptor Fc fusion proteins.
6.4.2. Ephrin-B2 and EphB4
Ephrin-B2 has been detected in the vasculature of a variety of tumor types, where it is expressed in a proportion of the endothelial cells38,51,78,86 (Fig. 4B). This suggests that tumor capillaries can have arterial or venous identity, contrary to previous beliefs based on morphological criteria. EphB4 expression in tumor endothelial cells remains to be characterized, however, and it is not known whether the ephrin-B2- negative tumor blood vessels express EphB4 and whether a complementary expression of endothelial ephrin-B2 and EphB4 is important for the formation of new vascular networks in tumors. Ephrin-B2 expression in tumor blood vessels is likely upregulated by VEGF (Sec. 2.4) and hypoxia.81,82 However, expression of ephrin-B2 was not detected in the smooth muscle cells associated with the vasculature of Lewis lung carcinomas grown subcutaneously in mice.78
Enhanced expression of the EphB4 receptor ectodomain on the tumor cell surface has been shown to promote tumor growth by promoting ephrin-B2 reverse signaling in the tumor blood vessels.38 Interestingly, increased EphB4 ectodomain expression in the tumor cells increases the size of the blood vessels and the blood content of the tumors, consistent with the enlarging effects of EphB4 Fc on the chicken allantoic arteries and the enlarged ear skin blood vessels in transgenic mice overexpressing ephrin-B2 in endothelial cells.43,71 Conversely, A375 melanoma cells secreting soluble monomeric EphB4
EPH Receptors and Ephrins 57
ectodomain form much smaller tumors when injected subcutaneously in nude mice, presumably because the EphB4 ectodomain blocks the interaction between EphB2 on the surface of the tumor cells and endothelial ephrin-B2.87 Indeed, tumor regions where the EphB4 ectodomain was present at highest levels had low microvessel densities and more collapsed vessels lacking a lumen.
Although ephrin-B2 reverse signaling does not appear to be required during early embryonic angiogenesis, angiogenic effects of ephrin-B2 in tumors are consistent with the pro-angiogenic effects of ephrin-B2 reverse signaling in cultured endothelial cells.36−38 Ephrin-B2 reverse signaling can also regulate the vasculature in vivo. For example, defects in the postnatal lung vasculature have been reported in mice expressing mutated ephrin-B2 lacking the PDZ domain-binding site73 and EphB4 Fc treatment of the allantoic membrane blood vessels of the E4 chicken embryo, which have already undergone remodeling into a network of large and small vessels, causes retraction or regression of venules, enlargement of arteries and formation of arterial-venous shunts.43 Furthermore, defects in capillary architecture in the kidney glomeruli and the mammary gland of mice overexpressing EphB4 in epithelial cells support a role for ephrin-B2 reverse signaling in endothelial cells stimulated by EphB4 expression in surrounding cells.88 Interestingly, ephrinB2 is upregulated in Kaposi’s sarcoma, an angioproliferative tumor derived from endothelial cells, and is required for the viability of the tumor cells.50
Additional evidence suggests that endothelial EphB receptors also play an important role in tumor angiogenesis. For example, ephrin-B1 is upregulated in hepatocellular carcinomas and promotes hepatocellular tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model without affecting the growth of the tumor cells in culture.27 Thus, ephrin-B1 on the surface of the tumor cells may be involved in tumor progression in vivo by promoting tumor angiogenesis through endothelial EphB receptors (Fig. 4B). Consistent with this hypothesis, the number of blood vessels in tumor xenografts is increased by ephrin-B1 expression in the tumor cells and ephrin-B1 Fc enhances HUVE cell migration and proliferation in vitro.27 Interestingly, treatment of the E4 chicken embryo allantois with ephrin-B2 Fc causes morphological effects in the vasculature.43
58 E. B. Pasquale
These morphological changes, presumably mediated by EphB4, include increased branching of veins, dramatic enlargement of both veins and arteries and formation of arterious-venous shunts. However, despite increasing blood vessel density, ephrin-B2 overexpression in human colorectal cancer cells decreases tumor growth and blood perfusion in a mouse xenograft model.89 Thus, additional studies are required in order to fully elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which Eph receptors and ephrins affect tumor progression by contributing to tumor vascularization.
7.Targeting Eph Receptor-Ephrin Interactions to Modulate Angiogenesis
In conditions where angiogenesis is part of the disease pathology, it is therapeutically desirable to inhibit it. A number of receptor tyrosine kinases expressed in endothelial cells are validated targets for anti-angiogenic therapies. Eph receptors and ephrins are also emerging as new attractive targets. EphA receptor Fc fusion protein and soluble monomeric forms of EphB4 have been successfully used as antagonists in animal tumor models.14,19,48,87 Furthermore, intravitreal injection of ephrin-B2 Fc or EphB4 Fc, which presumably perturb the function of the corresponding endogenously expressed proteins, reduce the pathological neovascularization occurring in a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy.90 Thus, ephrin-B2 and EphB4 might be useful targets for therapies to treat retinopathy of prematurity and the abnormal retinal vascularization characterizing macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. Although Fc fusion proteins are quite stable when administered systemically in vivo, Eph receptorand ephrin-based agents lack selectivity because of the promiscuity of Eph receptor-ephrin binding (Sec. 1.3). More selective Eph receptortargeting reagents that have been developed include antagonistic peptides that target the ephrin-binding site of individual Eph receptors,91,92 siRNAs and antisense oligodeoxynucleotides.93−95 Peptides as well as antibodies that target extracellular regions of Eph receptors and ephrins could also be used to deliver anti-angiogenic drugs.
EPH Receptors and Ephrins 59
In other conditions that are characterized by ischemia, such as heart disease, stroke and wound healing, it may be desirable to use reagents that enhance the pro-angiogenic activities of Eph receptors and ephrins, such as activating peptides or antibodies.96,97 Ephrins or Eph receptor ectodomains incorporated into fibrin matrices could also be useful to promote angiogenesis, as shown for ephrin-B2.98 Targeting Eph receptors and ephrins to stimulate or inhibit angiogenesis is an area just beginning to be explored and where rapid developments are expected.
8. Perspectives
The last few years have seen the discovery of Eph receptors and ephrins as new families of angiogenic factors that can discriminate between arteries and veins and that play a role not only in endothelial cells but also in the surrounding support cells. EphB4 and ephrin-B2 are expressed in angiogenic vasculature during embryonic development, at sites of adult neovascularization, and also in the mature quiescent vasculature. These expression patterns suggest diverse roles in neovascularization and the maintenance of mature blood vessels. The EphA2 receptor is also expressed at sites of adult neovascularization but, surprisingly, it has not been detected in normal developing vasculature or quiescent vasculature. This expression pattern makes EphA2 a particularly attractive target for selective anti-angiogenic therapies. On the other hand, ephrin-A1 is in developing but not adult vasculature. Therefore, additional A class Eph receptors and ephrins with angiogenic activities likely remain to be discovered. Antibodies with well-defined specificities will be critical in order to accurately map the expression patterns of different Eph receptors and ephrins in developing and postnatal vasculature. Despite the remarkable progress made so far, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms and signaling pathways used by Eph receptors and ephrins to regulate blood and lymphatic vessels. Areas of particular interest for the future will be to better characterize the roles of Eph receptors and ephrins in the expansion versus the differentiation of vascular stem cells and the role of different levels of hypoxia in regulating the expression of Eph and ephrin genes in endothelial cells and the surrounding tissue. It will also be important
