- •CONTENTS
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •I Components of Angiogenic Cascades
- •1. Introduction and Historical Perspective
- •2. The Semaphorins
- •3. The Plexin Receptor Family
- •4. The Neuropilins
- •5. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors
- •6. Signal Transduction by Neuropilins
- •7. The Role of the Neuropilins in the Regulation of Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis
- •8. Modulation of Angiogenesis by Semaphorins that Bind Directly to Plexins
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1. Eph receptor domain structure
- •1.2. The ephrin domain structure
- •2. Effects on Vascular Cell Behavior and Signaling Pathways
- •2.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •2.2. Ephrin-A1 and EphA4
- •2.3. Ephrin-B and EphB
- •2.3.1. EphB forward signaling
- •2.3.2. Ephrin-B reverse signaling
- •2.4. Crosstalk with other angiogenic pathways
- •3. Endothelial Cell Fate
- •4. Angiogenic Remodeling of Embryonic Blood Vessels
- •4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA receptors
- •4.2. EphB4 and Ephrin-B2
- •4.3. Other EphB receptors and Ephrin-Bs
- •5. Lymphatic Vessels
- •6. Adult Vasculature
- •6.1. Quiescent vasculature
- •6.2. Physiological angiogenesis
- •6.3. Inflammation and wound healing
- •6.4. Tumor angiogenesis
- •6.4.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
- •6.4.2. Ephrin-B2 and EphB4
- •8. Perspectives
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Molecular Mechanisms
- •3. Role in Vascular Development
- •4. FGFs in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •5. Role of FGFs in Developmental and Tumor Lymphangiogenesis
- •7. Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. The NPY System
- •2. NPY as a Growth Factor for Vascular Cells
- •3. DPPIV: A Molecular Switch of the NPY Angiogenic System
- •4. Downstream Mediators of NPY Actions
- •5. NPY in Revascularization of Ischemic Tissues
- •6. NPY in Wound Healing
- •7. NPY in Adipose Tissue Growth and Obesity
- •8. NPY in Retinopathy
- •10. NPY in Tumor Angiogenesis
- •11. NPY-Mediated Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Historical Perspective
- •3.1. The HSPG core proteins
- •3.2. The structure of the HS chain
- •3.3. The biosynthesis of HS
- •3.4. The post-synthetic processing of HSPGs
- •4. Evolution of HSPGs
- •5. HSPGs in Development
- •6. HSPG Modulation of Ligand-Receptor Interactions
- •6.2. HSPG co-receptors confer unique regulatory properties
- •6.2.1. Co-receptors engender stoichiometric control of signaling
- •6.2.2. The effects of glycanation
- •6.2.3. HS sequence motifs regulate signaling
- •7. HSPGs Enable Global Control of EC Phenotype
- •8. Future Therapeutic Directions
- •9. Conclusions
- •References
- •II Angiogenic Regulators
- •1. Introduction: Blood Vessels and Nerves Use Similar Guidance Cues
- •2. Semaphorin Signaling
- •2.1. Neuropilins
- •2.2. Plexins
- •3. Ephrins and Eph Signaling
- •3.1. Forward signaling
- •3.2. Reverse signaling
- •4. Netrin and Slit Signaling
- •5. Open Questions
- •References
- •1. Oxygen Homeostasis: Phylogeny, Ontogeny, Physiology, and Pathobiology
- •5. Control of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis by HIF-1
- •6. Control of Tumor Angiogenesis by HIF-1
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Vasculature
- •3. ROS and Angiogenesis
- •4. NAD(P)H Oxidase: A Major Source of ROS in the Vasculature
- •5. Role of NAD(P)H Oxidase in Angiogenesis
- •6. ROS as Signaling Molecules in Angiogenesis
- •8. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Assessing Coronary Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis
- •3. Pressure Overload-Induced Hypertrophy
- •4. Volume Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
- •5. Thyroxine-Induced Hypertrophy
- •6. Hypoxia-Induced Hypertrophy
- •7. Exercise-Induced Hypertrophy
- •8. Myocardial Infarction-Induced Hypertrophy
- •9. Modulators of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •10. Stimuli of Angiogenesis During Hypertrophy
- •11. Summary
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Coronary Resistance
- •3. Regulation of Coronary Microvascular Tone
- •3.1. Intrinsic and extrinsic vasomotor control
- •3.2. Role of the endothelium
- •3.3. Role of metabolism and autoregulation
- •3.4. Flow-induced dilation
- •3.5. Neurohumoral influence on microcirculation
- •3.6. Intrinsic myogenic tone
- •3.7. Impact of extravascular and humoral factors on the coronary microcirculation
- •3.8. Role of venules in coronary resistance
- •4. Endothelial Factors in Vascular Growth and Response to Injury
- •5. Impact of Disease States on Coronary Circulation
- •6. The Coronary Microcirculation in Hypertophic States
- •7. Summary
- •References
- •III Clinical Applications
- •1. Kinase Inhibition and Tumor Angiogenesis
- •2. Major Angiogenesis Factors and Receptors
- •2.1. VEGF signaling
- •3. Further Angiogenesis-Related Signaling
- •4. Need for Selectivity of Anti-Angiogenic Kinase Inhibitors
- •5. Kinase Inhibitors in Clinical Development
- •5.1. BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)
- •5.2. PTK/ZK (Vatalanib)
- •5.3. SU11248 (Sunitinib)
- •5.9. BIBF 1120
- •5.10. Chir-258
- •5.12. SU5416 (Semaxinib)
- •6. Challenges and Future Directions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Concepts and Rationales
- •3. Strategy
- •4. Clinical Trials
- •4.1. Growth factor-based, angiogenic approach
- •4.2. Cell therapy-based, vasculogenic and paracrine approach
- •5. Issues Regarding Current Strategy
- •5.1. Choice of biological agent
- •5.2. Pharmacokinetics and delivery mode
- •5.3. Monitoring of neovascularization
- •5.4. Study design
- •6. Emerging Concepts of Therapeutic Angiogenesis
- •6.1. Neovascularization responsiveness
- •6.2. Genetic determination of neovascularization
- •7. Future Prospective
- •8. Summary
- •References
- •1. Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Cardiovascular System
- •2. HGF Signaling in Endothelial Cells
- •3. Angiogenic Therapy for Ischemic Peripheral Arterial Diseases
- •4. Clinical Trial in PAD
- •5. HGF Gene Therapy for Myocardial Ischemia
- •6. HGF Gene Therapy for Restenosis After Angioplasty
- •7. Next Five Years Perspective — Future Direction of HGF Therapy
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •1. Endothelial Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease
- •1.1. Nitric oxide synthases
- •1.2. Physiological role of endothelial NO (“EDNO”)
- •1.3. Endothelial NO-deficiency in cardiovascular diseases
- •1.4. Therapeutic restoration of endothelial NO production in cardiovascular diseases
- •2. Nitric Oxide and Angiogenesis
- •2.2. Tumor angiogenesis and NO
- •2.3. Evidence in cultured endothelial cells and in rabbit cornea
- •2.4. Role of NO in post-ischemic revascularization
- •2.6. Molecular mechanisms
- •3. NOS Gene Transfer
- •3.1. Gene delivery vectors
- •3.2. NOS-III gene transfer
- •3.3. NOS-II gene transfer
- •4.1. Impaired angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in patients with critical limb ischemia
- •4.2.1. NOS-III-KO mice
- •4.2.2. NOS-III transgenic mice
- •4.2.3. Wild-type NOS-III gene transfer in normal rats
- •4.5.1. Plasmid delivery of the NOS1177D gene
- •4.5.2. Adenoviral delivery of the NOS1179D gene
- •6. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Index
32 E. B. Pasquale
2. Effects on Vascular Cell Behavior and Signaling Pathways
Eph receptor forward signaling and ephrin reverse signaling can dramatically influence the behavior of endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells both in vitro and in angiogenesis assays in vivo. The signaling pathways regulated by Eph receptors and ephrins in vascular cells are beginning to be elucidated through in vitro studies, but the importance of these pathways for physiological angiogenesis in vivo remains to be verified. Ephrin extracellular domains fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1 have been extensively used to activate Eph receptor signaling pathways in angiogenesis assays because they are soluble and dimeric, and can be multimerized by anti-Fc antibodies. Thus, they can be used to induce the Eph receptor dimerization and further clustering that are important for proper signaling.1,13 Similarly, Eph receptor ectodomains fused to Fc have been used to stimulate ephrin reverse signaling. Eph receptor and ephrin Fc fusion proteins, however, can also function as inhibitors because they disrupt endogenous Eph receptorephrin interactions. For example, EphA receptor Fc fusion proteins have been used to inhibit EphA forward signaling, which has established the importance of EphA receptors in postnatal angiogenesis14,15 (Sec. 6).
2.1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2
Ephrin-A1 and EphA2 are the main ephrin and Eph receptor of the A class that have thus far been implicated in endothelial cell function (Fig. 2A). In a widely used in vitro angiogenesis model, endothelial cells plated onto reconstituted basement membrane proteins (Matrigel) respond by forming capillary tube-like structures. Interestingly, one of the consequences of plating human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVE) cells on Matrigel is the upregulation of ephrin-A1.16 The effect of ephrin-A1 in capillary morphogenesis on Matrigel was confirmed by showing that exogenously added ephrin-A1 Fc promotes the assembly of capillary structures in HUVE cells and mouse pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, both of which express high levels of the EphA2 receptor.5,17 Furthermore, reducing expression of the transcription factor Homeobox B3 (HoxB3) with antisense oligonucleotides decreases
EPH Receptors and Ephrins 33
ephrin-A1 expression and impairs capillary morphogenesis in dermal microvascular endothelial cells.18 Given that treatment with ephrin-A1 Fc restores capillary-like tube formation in the HoxB3-deficient cells, these data suggest that the HoxB3-dependent expression of ephrin-A1 is important for endothelial capillary morphogenesis driven by extracellular matrix proteins. Not all endothelial cells may respond to ephrin-A1 Fc, however. Human renal microvascular endothelial cells, for example, reportedly do not form capillary-like tubes in response to ephrin-A1 Fc.17 The reason for this lack of responsiveness to ephrin-A1 Fc remains mysterious, since these cells express EphA2 and can form capillary-like tubes when treated with ephrin-B1 Fc (Sec. 2.3).
Consistent with a role as an angiogenic factor, ephrin-A1 Fc also promotes endothelial cell migration. Ephrin-A1 Fc acts as a chemoattractant for bovine adrenal capillary endothelial cells and microvascular endothelial cells in transwell migration assays and promotes the movement of cells into a “wound” devoid of cells in a confluent endothelial cell monolayer.5,14,19,20 Ephrin-A1 Fc also induces endothelial cell sprouting in an in vitro capillary sprouting assay.19 In this assay, microvascular endothelial cells are cultured on collagen-coated beads embedded in fibrin gels and form capillary sprouts that extend out from the beads into the fibrin matrix.
Additional studies have shown that ephrin-A1 Fc also promotes the formation of blood vessels in a variety of in vivo angiogenesis assays. These assays include: (i) corneal neovascularization assays, where hydron pellets impregnated with ephrin-A1 Fc induce the formation of blood vessels when implanted in a micropocket in the normally avascular rodent cornea;5,19 (ii) Matrigel assays, where Matrigel injected under the mouse skin forms plugs that promote the assembly of endothelial cells into blood vessels when supplemented with ephrin-A1 Fc; and (iii) assays in which surgical sponges impregnated with ephrinA1 Fc and implanted in the dorsal flank of mice attract an increased number of host blood vessels compared to control sponges.20
Ephrin-A1 appears to have similar pro-angiogenic effects when it is endogenously expressed in endothelial cells and as an exogenous Fc fusion protein. Hence, the angiogenic effects of ephrin-A1 can be mainly attributed to its stimulation of EphA receptor forward signaling because
34 E. B. Pasquale
ephrin-A1 Fc lacks the ability to mediate reverse signals. Indeed, mutants of the EphA2 receptor that inhibit EphA receptor forward signaling in a dominant negative manner block the in vitro angiogenic effects of ephrin-A1 Fc, while a constitutively active EphA2 mutant enhances angiogenic responses.20,21 Furthermore, an EphA antagonist such as EphA2 Fc strongly inhibits capillary formation in an in vitro rat aortic ring explant assay and in an in vivo Matrigel assay.15 Since EphA2 Fc can also activate ephrin-A1 reverse signaling (Sec. 2), this experiment corroborates the idea that ephrin-A1 reverse signaling may not promote angiogenesis.
The requirement for EphA2 signaling in endothelial cell migration and vascular assembly has been confirmed by the impaired angiogenic responses to ephrin-A1 Fc in microvascular endothelial cells isolated from EphA2 knockout mice as well as in endothelial cells in which EphA2 expression was downregulated with antisense oligonucleotides.19,20 A signaling pathway involving phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3 kinase and the Rho family GTPase, Rac1, has been implicated in the effects of EphA2 on microvascular endothelial cell migration in vitro.20,22 Although EphA2 is not expressed in the embryonic vasculature, this receptor has been confirmed as a key player in postnatal angiogenesis in vivo because EphA2 knockout mice exhibit a diminished angiogenic response to surgical sponges impregnated with ephrin-A1 Fc.20 Furthermore, microvascular endothelial cells from EphA2 knockout mice fail to elongate and assemble into capillaries in Matrigel plugs implanted into wild-type recipient mice. The EphA2-deficient cells also have impaired survival in the Matrigel plugs, but appear to proliferate normally, which is consistent with the lack of in vitro effects of ephrinA1 Fc on endothelial cell proliferation.19
2.2. Ephrin-A1 and EphA4
Endothelial ephrin-A1 likely coordinates different aspects of angiogenesis by activating EphA receptors not only in endothelial cells, but also in the surrounding vascular smooth muscle cells (Fig. 2A). In cultured smooth muscle cells, ephrin-A1 Fc causes a repulsive response involving increased assembly and contractility of actin stress fibers and
