Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Minimizing Incisions and Maximizing Outcomes in Cataract Surgery_Alio, Fine_2010.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
17.96 Mб
Скачать

258

R. J. Cionni and D. Hair

protective mechanisms from Class 1 photochemical damage, the aging retina is less able to provide sufficient protection from insults like blue light [18, 19].

Several epidemiological studies have concluded that cataract surgery and/or subsequent increased blue wavelength light exposure may be associated with the progression of macular degeneration [20, 21]. Still, other epidemiologic studies have failed to come to this conclusion [22–24]. Such conflicting epidemiological results are not unexpected since age-related macular diseases is felt to be a multifactorial biologic process. Therefore, many of the studies concerning the effect of blue light on the retina have been conducted in animals and in vitro [25–30]. Many of these laboratory studies demonstrate a susceptibility of the RPE to damage, when exposed to blue light [31, 32].

Since blue light can potentially induce retinal injury, the etiology or the mechanism of this damage needs to be studied. It is well known that lipofuscin accumulates in the RPE cells as we age. One component of lipofuscin, known as A2E, is believed to be a key culprit in RPE cell death. A2E has an excitation maximum in the blue wavelength region (441 nm) and when excited by blue light, A2E generates oxygen free radicals. These free radicals are believed to cause RPE damage and ultimately cell death. At Columbia University, Sparrow and colleagues exposed cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells laden with A2E, to blue light and observed extensive cell death. They then placed different UV blocking IOLs or combined UV blocking/blue light filtering IOL in the path of the blue light and evaluated the effect. The results of this study demonstrated that cell death was extensive with all UV blocking colorless IOLs, but cell death significantly diminished with the combined UV and blue light filtering IOL [33]. These experiments were conducted in vitro and therefore could not take into account any natural protective mechanisms that might be present in vivo. Additionally, the light exposure employed is a mere representative of high-level short term exposure rather than low level chronic exposure, experienced by the natural eye. Still, this work demonstrates clearly that blue light filtering IOLs can help the A2E-ladden RPE cells to survive the phototoxic insult of the blue light.

The link between uveal melanoma and blue light has recently begun to receive increased attention. Burnier and colleagues investigated the effect of blue light on the proliferation rates of four human uveal melanoma cell lines [6]. This study clearly demonstrated the

increased proliferation of the melanoma cells after exposure to blue light compared to the cells without exposure. When comparing cells that had UV only and cells with blue filtering lenses present during light exposure, it was evident that the UV only subgroup had a higher proliferation rate. Again, it must be realized that this in an in vitro study and its significance clinically is unknown.

Summary

A growing body of literature suggests that blue light exposure may be one of the factors in the progression of macular degeneration. Also, blue light exposure may be a factor in the development of uveal melanoma. In vitro evidence suggests that blocking blue light may have a protective effect against these two entities.

8.3.4.3Importance of Blue Light to Cataract and Refractive Lens Exchange Patients

The human crystalline lens normally filters ultraviolet light and much of the light throughout the blue wavelength spectrum [34]. When the natural lens is removed during cataract or RLE surgery, blue-wavelength light then, has the potential to reach the retina at significantly increased levels. If a colorless UV blocking IOL is implanted, the RPE cells remain exposed to this increased level of potentially damaging blue light. Until now, three manufacturers have developed IOLs that filter blue light in addition to UV light.

The AcrySof® Natural (Alconlabs, Inc, Fort Worth, TX) is a hydrophobic acrylic foldable IOL, that incorporates a yellow chromophore cross-linked to the acrylic molecules. This yellow chromophore allows the IOL to filter not only UV light, but also specific levels of light in the blue wavelength region. Aging studies with this lens have shown that the chromophore will not leach out or discolor [35]. The AcrySof® Natural IOL was approved for use in Europe in 2002 and in the USA in 2003. Evaluation of its light transmission curve demonstrates that this IOL approximates the transmission spectrum of the normal human crystalline lens in the blue light spectrum (Fig. 8.51). Therefore, in addition to benefiting from less blue light exposure of the retina, color perception should seem more natural to these patients as opposed to the