- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Contents
- •Introduction
- •Literature Review
- •Major Issues
- •Major Studies
- •Negative Studies
- •References
- •1.1.1 Introduction
- •1.1.3 Torsional Ultrasound
- •1.1.4 Our Procedure for Emulsifying the Nucleus
- •References
- •1.2 Transitioning to Bimanual MICS
- •1.2.1 Introduction
- •1.2.2 Technique
- •1.2.3 Summary
- •1.3 0.7 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery
- •1.3.1 Sub 1 mm MICS: Why?
- •1.3.3 Instrumentation
- •1.3.3.2 0.7 mm Irrigating Instruments
- •1.3.4 Surgery
- •1.3.4.1 Incision
- •1.3.4.2 Capsulorhexis
- •1.3.4.3 Hydrodissection
- •1.3.4.4 Prechopping
- •1.3.5 0.7 mm MICS Combined Procedures
- •1.3.5.1 0.7 mm MICS and Glaucoma Surgery
- •1.3.6 Summary
- •References
- •2. MICS Instrumentation
- •2.1 MICS Instrument Choice: The First Step in the Transition
- •2.2 MICS Incision
- •2.3 MICS Capsulorhexis
- •2.4 MICS Prechopping
- •2.5 MICS Irrigation/Aspiration Instruments
- •2.5.1 19 G Instruments
- •2.5.2 21 G Instruments
- •2.6 MICS Auxiliary Instrument
- •2.6.1 Scissors
- •2.6.2 Gas Forced Infusion
- •2.6.3 Surge Prevention
- •2.7 New MICS Instruments
- •2.7.1 Flat Instruments
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Power Generation
- •3.3.1 Tuning
- •3.2.2 Phaco Energy
- •3.2.2.1 Low Frequency Energy
- •3.2.2.2 High Frequency Energy
- •3.2.3 Transient Cavitation
- •3.2.4 Sustained Cavitation
- •3.3.1 Alteration of Stroke Length
- •3.3.2 Alteration of Duration
- •3.3.2.1 Burst Mode
- •3.3.2.2 Pulse Mode
- •Micro Pulse (Hyper-Pulse)
- •Pulse Shaping
- •3.3.3 Alteration of Emission
- •3.4 Fluidics
- •3.5 Vacuum Sources
- •3.6 Surge
- •3.7.1 Micro-incisional Phaco
- •3.7.2 Bimanual Micro-Incisional Phaco
- •3.7.3 Micro-Incisional Coaxial Phaco
- •3.7.3.1 Irrigation and Aspiration
- •3.8 Conclusion
- •Reference
- •Further Reading
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3 Incision Size
- •4.4 Torsional Ultrasound
- •4.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •5. Technology Available
- •5.1 How to Better Use Fluidics with MICS
- •5.1.1 Physical Considerations
- •5.1.1.2 Chamber Stability
- •5.1.1.3 Holdability
- •5.1.2 Surgical Considerations
- •5.1.2.2 Phaco Technique
- •5.1.2.4 The OS3 and CataRhex SwissTech Platforms
- •Equipment
- •Machine Settings
- •5.2 How to Use Power Modulation in MICS
- •5.2.1 Introduction
- •5.2.3 The Concept of Unoccluded Flow Vacuum
- •5.2.4 The Intricacies of Ultrasound Power Modulation
- •5.2.5 The Variable Incidence of Wound Burn Rates
- •References
- •5.3 MICS with Different Platforms
- •5.3.1 MICS with the Accurus Surgical System
- •5.3.1.1 Introduction and Historic Background
- •5.3.1.3 Surgical Parameters for MICS with Accurus
- •5.3.1.4 Final Considerations
- •5.3.2.1 Introduction
- •5.3.2.7 Technology for MICS on the AMO Signature
- •5.3.2.8 Applying Signature Technology to CMICS and BMICS
- •5.3.3 MICS with Different Platforms: Stellaris Vision Enhancement System
- •5.3.3.2 Evaluating the Stellaris Vision Enhancement System
- •5.3.3.3 The Advantages of BMICS
- •References
- •6.1 Pupil Dilation and Preoperative Preparation
- •6.1.1 Managing the Small Pupil
- •6.1.2 Techniques that Depend on the Manipulation of the Pupil
- •6.1.3 Iris Surgery
- •6.1.4 Preoperative Preparation and Infection Prophylaxis
- •6.1.5 Evaluating Risk
- •6.1.6 Assessing Your Approach
- •6.1.7 Preventing Infection, Step by Step
- •6.1.8 Sample Protocol Outline
- •6.1.9 A Careful, Critical Eye
- •References
- •6.2 Incisions
- •References
- •6.3 Thermodynamics
- •6.3.1 Introduction
- •6.3.2 Corneal Thermal Damage
- •6.3.3 Heat Generation
- •6.3.4 Factors that Contribute to Thermal Incision Damage
- •6.3.4.1 Energy Emission: Amount and Pattern of How the Energy Is Delivered
- •6.3.4.3 Viscoelastic Devices and Possible Occlusion of the Aspiration Line
- •6.3.4.4 Irrigation Flow
- •6.3.4.5 Position of the Tip Inside the Incision
- •6.3.4.6 Tip Design
- •6.3.4.7 Surgical Technique
- •6.3.5 Conclusion
- •6.4 Using Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices with Smaller Incisions
- •6.4.1 Introduction
- •6.4.1.1 The Nature of OVDs: Rheology
- •6.4.1.3 Soft Shell and Ultimate Soft Shell Technique (SST & USST)
- •6.4.2 Routine, Special and complicated Cases
- •6.4.2.1 Phakic and Anterior Chamber IOLs
- •6.4.2.3 Fuchs’ Endothelial Dystrophy
- •6.4.2.5 Capsular Staining for White & Black Cataracts
- •6.4.2.6 Flomax® Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome USST
- •6.4.3 Discussion
- •References
- •6.5 Capsulorhexis
- •References
- •References
- •6.7 Biaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery: Techniques and Sample Surgical Parameters
- •6.8.1 Surgical Technique
- •6.8.2 Advantages
- •6.8.3 Disadvantages
- •6.8.4 Final Thoughts
- •References
- •6.9 BiMICS vs. CoMICS: Our Actual Technique (Bimanual Micro Cataract Surgery vs. Coaxial Micro Cataract Surgery)
- •6.9.1 Introduction
- •6.9.2 Historical Background
- •6.9.3 BiMICS. BiManual MicroIncision Cataract Surgery
- •6.9.3.1 Introduction
- •6.9.3.2 Instrumentation
- •6.9.3.5 Phacotips
- •6.9.3.6 Capsulorhexis
- •6.9.3.7 Phaco Knives
- •6.9.3.8 The Phaco Machines
- •6.9.3.9 Phaco Pumps
- •6.9.3.10 Ultrasound Power Delivery
- •6.9.3.11 IOL Implantation
- •6.9.3.12 Astigmatism
- •6.9.4.1 Capsulorhexis
- •6.9.4.2 Phacotips
- •6.9.4.3 The Phaco Machines
- •6.9.4.4 Phaco Pumps
- •6.9.4.5 Ultrasound Power Delivery
- •6.9.4.6 Irrigation-Aspiration
- •6.9.4.7 Incision-Assisted IOL Implantation
- •6.9.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •6.10 Endophthalmitis Prevention
- •6.10.1 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •6.10.2 Wound Construction
- •6.10.3 Summary
- •References
- •7.1 High Myopia
- •7.2 Posterior Polar Cataract
- •7.3 Posterior Subluxed Cataracts
- •7.4 Mature Cataract with Zonular Dialysis
- •7.5 Punctured Posterior Capsule
- •7.6 Posterior Capsule Rupture
- •7.7 Pseudoexfoliation
- •7.8 Rock-Hard Nuclei
- •7.9 Switching Hands
- •7.10 Microcornea or Microphthalmos
- •7.11 Large Iridodialysis and Zonular Defects
- •7.12 Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome (IFIS)
- •7.14 Iris Bombé
- •7.15 Very Shallow Anterior Chambers
- •7.16 Refractive Lens Exchange
- •7.18 Intraocular Cautery
- •7.19 Biaxial Microincision Instruments
- •References
- •7.1 MICS in Special Cases: Incomplete Capsulorhexis
- •7.1.1 Introduction
- •7.1.2 Avoiding Complications While Constructing Your Microcapsulorhexis
- •7.1.3 Avoiding Complications During Biaxial Phaco with an Incomplete Capsulorhexis
- •7.1.4 Avoiding Complications During IOL Insertion with an Incomplete Capsulorhexis
- •7.1.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •7.2 MICS in Special Cases (on CD): Vitreous Loss
- •7.2.1 Introduction
- •7.2.2 Posterior Capsule Tears and Vitreous Prolapse
- •7.2.3 Vitreous and the Epinucleus or Cortex
- •7.2.4 Different Techniques Other than Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Nuclear Loss in Vitreous
- •7.2.5 Pars Plana Vitrectomy
- •7.2.6 Zonulolysis
- •References
- •7.3 How to Deal with Very Hard and Intumescent Cataracts
- •7.3.1 Introduction
- •7.3.2 Types of Cataracts
- •7.3.3 Management of Hard Cataracts Through Biaxial Technique
- •7.3.4 Incision
- •7.3.5 Capsulorrhexis
- •7.3.6 Hydrodissection
- •7.3.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •8. IOL Types and Implantation Techniques
- •8.1 MICS Intraocular Lenses
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Lenses
- •8.1.2.2 ThinOptX MICS IOLs (ThinOptX, Abingdon, VA)
- •8.1.2.3 Akreos MI60 AO Micro Incision IOL (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY)
- •8.1.2.4 IOLtech MICS lens (IOLtech, La Rochelle, France; and Carl Zeiss Meditec, Stuttgard, Germany)
- •8.1.3 Optical Quality of MICS IOLs
- •8.1.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.2 Implantation Techniques
- •8.2.2 Prerequisites to a Sub-2 Injection
- •8.2.3 IOLs Used for Injection Through Microincision
- •8.2.3.1 Material
- •8.2.3.2 Design
- •8.2.3.3 Optic Design
- •8.2.3.4 Haptic Design
- •8.2.3.5 Posterior Barrier (360°)
- •8.2.4 Injectors Meant for Microincision
- •8.2.4.1 Objectives of Injectors Meant for Microincision
- •8.2.4.2 Characteristics of Sub-2 Injectors
- •8.2.4.3 The Cartridges
- •Loading Chambers
- •Injection Tunnels and Cartridge Tips
- •8.2.4.4 The Plunger Tips (or plunger)
- •8.2.4.5 Pushing Systems
- •8.2.4.6 Injector Bodies
- •8.2.4.7 Principal Sub-2 Injectors
- •8.2.5 Visco Elastic Substances and Injection Through Microincision
- •8.2.6 Techniques of Sub-2 Injection
- •8.2.6.2 Incision Construction
- •8.2.6.3 Pressurization of the Anterior Chamber
- •8.2.6.4 Loading the Cartridge
- •8.2.6.5 Loading the Injector
- •8.2.6.6 Insertion of the Plunger Tip
- •8.2.6.7 Injection in the Anterior Chamber
- •8.2.6.8 Positioning the IOL in the Capsular Bag
- •8.2.6.9 Removing the VES
- •8.2.6.10 Thin Roller Injector
- •8.2.6.11 Conclusion
- •Reference
- •8.3 Special Lenses
- •8.3.1 Toric Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery and Refractive Lens Exchange
- •8.3.1.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1.3 T-IOL Calculation
- •8.3.1.4 Current T-IOL Models
- •8.3.1.5 Preoperative Marking
- •8.3.1.6 Clinical Indications
- •8.3.1.7 Custom-Made Lenses
- •8.3.1.8 Conclusion for Practice
- •References
- •8.3.2 Special Lenses: MF
- •8.3.2.1 Discussion
- •8.3.2.2 Conclusion
- •8.3.2.3 Outlook
- •References
- •8.3.3 Special Lenses: Aspheric
- •References
- •8.3.4 Intraocular Lenses to Restore and Preserve Vision Following Cataract Surgery
- •8.3.4.1 Introduction
- •8.3.4.2 Why Filter Blue Light?
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.3 Importance of Blue Light to Cataract and Refractive Lens Exchange Patients
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.4 Quality of Vision with Blue Light Filtering IOLs
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.5 Clinical Experience
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.6 Unresolved Issues and Future Considerations
- •References
- •8.3.5 Microincision Intraocular Lenses: Others
- •8.3.5.1 ThinOptX®
- •8.3.5.2 Smart IOL
- •8.3.5.4 AcriTec
- •8.3.5.5 Akreos
- •8.3.5.7 Rayner
- •8.3.5.8 Injectable Polymers
- •8.3.5.9 Final Comments
- •References
- •9. Outcomes
- •9.1 Safety: MICS versus Coaxial Phaco
- •9.1.1 Introduction
- •9.1.2 Visual Outcomes
- •9.1.3 Incision Damage
- •9.1.4 Corneal Incision Burn
- •9.1.5 Corneal Changes
- •9.1.6 Infection
- •9.1.7 Summary
- •References
- •9.2 Control of Corneal Astigmatism and Aberrations
- •9.2.1 Introduction: Impacts of MICS Incision on the Outcomes of Cataract Surgery
- •9.2.2 Objective Evaluation of Corneal Incision
- •9.2.3 Control of Corneal Aberration and Astigmatism with MICS
- •9.2.4 Role of Corneal Aberrometry in Evaluating MICS Incision
- •9.2.5 Role of OCT in Evaluating MICS Incision
- •9.2.6 Our Experience in Corneal Aberrations and Astigmatism After MICS
- •9.2.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.3 Corneal Endothelium and Other Safety Issues
- •9.4 Incision Quality in MICS
- •9.4.1 Introduction: History of Incision Size Reduction
- •9.4.2 The Trends Towards Microincision Cataract Surgery (BMICS)
- •9.4.3 Advantages of Minimizing the Incision Size
- •9.4.4 Model for the Analysis of Corneal Incision Quality [21]
- •9.4.5 Our Protocol for Evaluation of Incision Quality in BMICS [21]
- •9.4.6 Results
- •9.4.6.1 Visual, Refractive and Biomicroscopic Outcomes
- •9.4.6.2 Incision Imaging (OCT) Outcomes
- •9.4.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •INDEX
7.1 MICS in Special Cases: Incomplete Capsulorhexis |
185 |
Fig. 7.49 Performing biaxial anterior vitrectomy in a sealed |
Fig. 7.50 A 3 pieces silicon IOL implanted in the bag, in a case |
chamber |
of incomplete capsulorhexis |
maintaining it behind the iris plane. Avoid possible surges. If a vitrector is not available or if the surgeon wants to have an immediate complete visualization of the intraocular structures before removing the irrigating device, he should change his aspirating cannula to a viscoelastic syringe using his dominant hand, and inject viscoelastic before removing the irrigating cannula (Fig. 7.47c). Once the eye is filled completely with the viscoelastic and there is enough positive pressure, irrigation should be stopped and the irrigating cannula should be removed. Now anterior chamber is completely formed with the viscoelastic, without surge or negative pressure induced to the eye. Now, the current state of the intraocular tissues can be reviewed calmly by the surgeon.
7.1.4Avoiding Complications During IOL Insertion with an Incomplete Capsulorhexis
IOL implantation in cases of incomplete capsulorrhexis is only mentioned briefly because it is something that should be evaluated depending on each case, either coaxial or biaxial, when a lack of posterior capsular integrity is highly suspected. It is not the aim of this chapter to make an analysis of each these steps. It is sufficient to mention the decisions to be taken by the surgeon at the end of each case of incomplete capsulorhexis:
1.Perform an adequate re-evaluation of integrity of capsular bag
2.Decide on the best IOL based on the particular circumstance (absence or presence of posterior capsule)
3.Be careful with injectors in the absence of the posterior capsule; consider the use of forceps when inserting the IOL.
4.Decide on the use of a helping device such as a capsular tension ring.
5.Decide on the technique for IOL fixation (e.g., iris suture, sulcus fixation, glue implantation) according to the situation and surgical experience (Fig. 7.50).
7.1.5 Conclusions
Many advantages have been observed when performing biaxial lens surgery in the management of complicated capsular case. These advantages can be noted from the first steps wh the surgeon starts to feel the capsular tissue and to the maneuvers that can be performed in order to avoid a more complicated case. But furthermore, these advantages are more evident during the management of the chop maneuvers, phacoemulsification, I/A and biaxial anterior vitrectomy when needed. It is completely true that MICS is not only a matter of incision size. It is a whole new perspective on the utilization of new tools, new maneuvers, new forces, new fluidics inside the eye, which helps the surgeon to decrease the possible complications of cataract
186 |
A. Pérez-Arteaga |
surgery. But of even great importance is its value in solving complex and challenging cases like that, which was presented in this chapter.
Remember to avoid applying force to the residual capsular bag and the zonular ligament if the surgeon is unsure that the capsulorhexis is complete.
Take Home Pearls
ßMICS surgery has distinct advantages over coaxial techniques in the management of
incomplete capsulorhexis cases.
ßThe irrigation handpiece in the nondominant hand becomes a powerful tool in maintaining a
positive intraocular pressure. Moreover, it keeps the nuclear fragments away from the endothelium and from the residual posterior capsule (or even the vitreous body).
ßWith MICS, it becomes easier for the surgeon to work safely at the iris plane in these particular
cases.
References
1.Sacu S, Menapace R, Findl O (2006) Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction. Am J Ophthalmol 141(3):488–493
2.Jacobs DS, Cox TA, Wagoner MD, Ariyasu RG, Karp CL (2006) Capsule staining as an adjunt to cataract surgery: a report from the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 113(4):707–713
3.Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M (2005) Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology 112(11):1997–2003
4.Garg A (2007) Dinamics of capsulorrhexis. In: Pinelli R, Fazio P (eds) Mastering the phacodynamics (tools, technology and innovations), Chapter 12. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, India
5.Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB (2006) Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 113(10):1818–1826
6.Brar N, Cremers SL (2007) Assessing surgery skills. Ophthalmology 114(8):1587–1587
7.Muqit MM, Menage MJ (2006) Intraoperative floppy Iris syndrome. Ophthalmology 113(10):1885–1886
8.Kawai K, Suzuki T, Hayakawa K (2005) The 23 gauge capsulorrhexis forceps having a cystotome function. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 30(1):11–13
9.Kawai K (2004) Comparison of 23 gauge and 25 gauge anterior capsulotomy forceps. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 29(3):105–110
10.Packer M., Hoffmann R., Fine H (2006) Refractive lens surgery. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 19(1):77–88
11.Wasserman D, Apple DJ, Castaneda VE, Tsai JC, Morgan RC, Assia EI (1991) Anterior capsular tears and loop fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 98(4):425–431
12.Castaneda VE, Legler UF, Tsai JC, Hoggatt JP, Assia EI, Hogan C, Apple DJ (1992) Posterior continuos curvilinear capsulorrhexis. An experimental study with clinical applications. Ophthalmology 99(1):45–50
13.Sallam A, Sherafat H (2007) Intraocular lens implantation in cases with anterior capsule tears extending to the posterior capsule. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(6):938–939
14.Marques FF, Marques DM, Osher RH, Osher JM (2006)
Fate of anterior capsular tears during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(10):1638–1642
15.Fishkind WJ, Discussion paper by Gimbel HV, Sun R. Ferensowics M (2001) Intraoperative management of capsular tears in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 108:2190–2192
16.Gimbel HV, Teuhann T (1990) Development, advantages and methods of continuos curvilinear capsulorhexis technique. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:31–37
17.Assia EI, Apple DJ, Tsai JC, Morgan RC (1991) Mechanism of radial tear formation after anterior capsulectomy. Ophthalmology 98:432–437
18.Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Dada T, Gupta V, Kumar A, Dada VK (2001) Management of posterior capsule tears. Surv Ophthalmol 45(6):473–488
19.Gimbel HV, Sun R, Ferensowicz M, Anderson Penno E, Kamal A (2001) Intraoperative management of posterior capsule tears in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 108(12):2186–2189; discussion 2190–2192
20.Assia EI, Apple DJ, Barden A, Tsai JC, Castaneda VE, Hoggatt JS (1991) An experimental study comparing various anterior capsulectomy techniques. Arch Ophthalmol 109(5):642–647
21.Hettlich HJ, El-Hifnawi ES (1997) Scanning electron microssopy studies of he human lens after capsulorhexis. Ophthalmologe 94(4):300–302
22.Hamada S, Low S, Walters BC, Nischal KK (2006) Fiveyear experience of the 2.incision push-pull technique for anterior and posterior capsulorhexis in pediatric cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 113(8):1309–1314
23.Oner FH, Durak I, Soylev M, Ergin M (2001) Long term results of various anterior capsulotomies and radial tears on intraocular lens centration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 32(2):118–123
24.Sallam A, Sherafat H (2007) Intraocular lens implantation in cases with anterior capsule tears extending to he posterior capsule. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(6):938–939; author reply 939–940
25.Osher RH (2007) Reply: inraocular lens implantation in cases with anterior capsule tears extending to he posterior capsule. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(6):939–940
26.Wilson ME (2004) Anterior lens capsule management in pediatric cataract surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 102:391–422
7.2 MICS in Special Cases (on CD): Vitreous Loss |
187 |
27.Kwartz J (1996) Implantation of foldable intraocular lenses in the presence of anterior capsular tears. Eye 10(Pt 4): 529–530
28.Perez-Arteaga A (2008) Step by step to biaxial lens surgery. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, India
7.2MICS in Special Cases (on CD): Vitreous Loss
Jerome Bovet
Core Messages
ßAs soon as the surgeon recognizes the presence of a posterior capsule rupture and vitre-
ous loss, it is best to remove all the instruments from the eye with care.
ßTriamcinolone may be injected inside the anterior chamber to visualize the vitreous.
ßBimanual anterior vitrectomy or sutureless pars plana bimanual vitrectomy can be performed.
ßBoth the techniques result in faster visual rehabilitation and better visual outcomes in patients
with posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss during MICS.
7.2.1 Introduction (Fig. 7.51)
MICS surgery has been the preferred method of cataract extraction during the last décade [1, 2]. A major advancement in the management of cataracts is early surgery, when the nucleus is still soft and before it becomes more dense. However, there are patients who already have mature cataracts at the time of the first examination. This obviously creates difficulties during surgery. Other ocular conditions that may present alone or in combination with cataracts are pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), iridodonesis-phacodonesis, zonulolysis, lens subluxation, and posterior polar cataracts. All of these may be addressed as the precursors of a probable intraoperative complication along with the mature white cataracts [3–5].
Vitreous loss is probably the most frequent serious complication encountered by cataract surgeons. A vitreous loss may increase the risk of cystoid macular
J. Bovet
Clinique de l’oeil, 15 bois de la chapelle, 1213 Onex /Geneva, Switzerland e-mail: jbovet@vision.tv
