- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Contents
- •Introduction
- •Literature Review
- •Major Issues
- •Major Studies
- •Negative Studies
- •References
- •1.1.1 Introduction
- •1.1.3 Torsional Ultrasound
- •1.1.4 Our Procedure for Emulsifying the Nucleus
- •References
- •1.2 Transitioning to Bimanual MICS
- •1.2.1 Introduction
- •1.2.2 Technique
- •1.2.3 Summary
- •1.3 0.7 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery
- •1.3.1 Sub 1 mm MICS: Why?
- •1.3.3 Instrumentation
- •1.3.3.2 0.7 mm Irrigating Instruments
- •1.3.4 Surgery
- •1.3.4.1 Incision
- •1.3.4.2 Capsulorhexis
- •1.3.4.3 Hydrodissection
- •1.3.4.4 Prechopping
- •1.3.5 0.7 mm MICS Combined Procedures
- •1.3.5.1 0.7 mm MICS and Glaucoma Surgery
- •1.3.6 Summary
- •References
- •2. MICS Instrumentation
- •2.1 MICS Instrument Choice: The First Step in the Transition
- •2.2 MICS Incision
- •2.3 MICS Capsulorhexis
- •2.4 MICS Prechopping
- •2.5 MICS Irrigation/Aspiration Instruments
- •2.5.1 19 G Instruments
- •2.5.2 21 G Instruments
- •2.6 MICS Auxiliary Instrument
- •2.6.1 Scissors
- •2.6.2 Gas Forced Infusion
- •2.6.3 Surge Prevention
- •2.7 New MICS Instruments
- •2.7.1 Flat Instruments
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Power Generation
- •3.3.1 Tuning
- •3.2.2 Phaco Energy
- •3.2.2.1 Low Frequency Energy
- •3.2.2.2 High Frequency Energy
- •3.2.3 Transient Cavitation
- •3.2.4 Sustained Cavitation
- •3.3.1 Alteration of Stroke Length
- •3.3.2 Alteration of Duration
- •3.3.2.1 Burst Mode
- •3.3.2.2 Pulse Mode
- •Micro Pulse (Hyper-Pulse)
- •Pulse Shaping
- •3.3.3 Alteration of Emission
- •3.4 Fluidics
- •3.5 Vacuum Sources
- •3.6 Surge
- •3.7.1 Micro-incisional Phaco
- •3.7.2 Bimanual Micro-Incisional Phaco
- •3.7.3 Micro-Incisional Coaxial Phaco
- •3.7.3.1 Irrigation and Aspiration
- •3.8 Conclusion
- •Reference
- •Further Reading
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3 Incision Size
- •4.4 Torsional Ultrasound
- •4.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •5. Technology Available
- •5.1 How to Better Use Fluidics with MICS
- •5.1.1 Physical Considerations
- •5.1.1.2 Chamber Stability
- •5.1.1.3 Holdability
- •5.1.2 Surgical Considerations
- •5.1.2.2 Phaco Technique
- •5.1.2.4 The OS3 and CataRhex SwissTech Platforms
- •Equipment
- •Machine Settings
- •5.2 How to Use Power Modulation in MICS
- •5.2.1 Introduction
- •5.2.3 The Concept of Unoccluded Flow Vacuum
- •5.2.4 The Intricacies of Ultrasound Power Modulation
- •5.2.5 The Variable Incidence of Wound Burn Rates
- •References
- •5.3 MICS with Different Platforms
- •5.3.1 MICS with the Accurus Surgical System
- •5.3.1.1 Introduction and Historic Background
- •5.3.1.3 Surgical Parameters for MICS with Accurus
- •5.3.1.4 Final Considerations
- •5.3.2.1 Introduction
- •5.3.2.7 Technology for MICS on the AMO Signature
- •5.3.2.8 Applying Signature Technology to CMICS and BMICS
- •5.3.3 MICS with Different Platforms: Stellaris Vision Enhancement System
- •5.3.3.2 Evaluating the Stellaris Vision Enhancement System
- •5.3.3.3 The Advantages of BMICS
- •References
- •6.1 Pupil Dilation and Preoperative Preparation
- •6.1.1 Managing the Small Pupil
- •6.1.2 Techniques that Depend on the Manipulation of the Pupil
- •6.1.3 Iris Surgery
- •6.1.4 Preoperative Preparation and Infection Prophylaxis
- •6.1.5 Evaluating Risk
- •6.1.6 Assessing Your Approach
- •6.1.7 Preventing Infection, Step by Step
- •6.1.8 Sample Protocol Outline
- •6.1.9 A Careful, Critical Eye
- •References
- •6.2 Incisions
- •References
- •6.3 Thermodynamics
- •6.3.1 Introduction
- •6.3.2 Corneal Thermal Damage
- •6.3.3 Heat Generation
- •6.3.4 Factors that Contribute to Thermal Incision Damage
- •6.3.4.1 Energy Emission: Amount and Pattern of How the Energy Is Delivered
- •6.3.4.3 Viscoelastic Devices and Possible Occlusion of the Aspiration Line
- •6.3.4.4 Irrigation Flow
- •6.3.4.5 Position of the Tip Inside the Incision
- •6.3.4.6 Tip Design
- •6.3.4.7 Surgical Technique
- •6.3.5 Conclusion
- •6.4 Using Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices with Smaller Incisions
- •6.4.1 Introduction
- •6.4.1.1 The Nature of OVDs: Rheology
- •6.4.1.3 Soft Shell and Ultimate Soft Shell Technique (SST & USST)
- •6.4.2 Routine, Special and complicated Cases
- •6.4.2.1 Phakic and Anterior Chamber IOLs
- •6.4.2.3 Fuchs’ Endothelial Dystrophy
- •6.4.2.5 Capsular Staining for White & Black Cataracts
- •6.4.2.6 Flomax® Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome USST
- •6.4.3 Discussion
- •References
- •6.5 Capsulorhexis
- •References
- •References
- •6.7 Biaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery: Techniques and Sample Surgical Parameters
- •6.8.1 Surgical Technique
- •6.8.2 Advantages
- •6.8.3 Disadvantages
- •6.8.4 Final Thoughts
- •References
- •6.9 BiMICS vs. CoMICS: Our Actual Technique (Bimanual Micro Cataract Surgery vs. Coaxial Micro Cataract Surgery)
- •6.9.1 Introduction
- •6.9.2 Historical Background
- •6.9.3 BiMICS. BiManual MicroIncision Cataract Surgery
- •6.9.3.1 Introduction
- •6.9.3.2 Instrumentation
- •6.9.3.5 Phacotips
- •6.9.3.6 Capsulorhexis
- •6.9.3.7 Phaco Knives
- •6.9.3.8 The Phaco Machines
- •6.9.3.9 Phaco Pumps
- •6.9.3.10 Ultrasound Power Delivery
- •6.9.3.11 IOL Implantation
- •6.9.3.12 Astigmatism
- •6.9.4.1 Capsulorhexis
- •6.9.4.2 Phacotips
- •6.9.4.3 The Phaco Machines
- •6.9.4.4 Phaco Pumps
- •6.9.4.5 Ultrasound Power Delivery
- •6.9.4.6 Irrigation-Aspiration
- •6.9.4.7 Incision-Assisted IOL Implantation
- •6.9.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •6.10 Endophthalmitis Prevention
- •6.10.1 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •6.10.2 Wound Construction
- •6.10.3 Summary
- •References
- •7.1 High Myopia
- •7.2 Posterior Polar Cataract
- •7.3 Posterior Subluxed Cataracts
- •7.4 Mature Cataract with Zonular Dialysis
- •7.5 Punctured Posterior Capsule
- •7.6 Posterior Capsule Rupture
- •7.7 Pseudoexfoliation
- •7.8 Rock-Hard Nuclei
- •7.9 Switching Hands
- •7.10 Microcornea or Microphthalmos
- •7.11 Large Iridodialysis and Zonular Defects
- •7.12 Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome (IFIS)
- •7.14 Iris Bombé
- •7.15 Very Shallow Anterior Chambers
- •7.16 Refractive Lens Exchange
- •7.18 Intraocular Cautery
- •7.19 Biaxial Microincision Instruments
- •References
- •7.1 MICS in Special Cases: Incomplete Capsulorhexis
- •7.1.1 Introduction
- •7.1.2 Avoiding Complications While Constructing Your Microcapsulorhexis
- •7.1.3 Avoiding Complications During Biaxial Phaco with an Incomplete Capsulorhexis
- •7.1.4 Avoiding Complications During IOL Insertion with an Incomplete Capsulorhexis
- •7.1.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •7.2 MICS in Special Cases (on CD): Vitreous Loss
- •7.2.1 Introduction
- •7.2.2 Posterior Capsule Tears and Vitreous Prolapse
- •7.2.3 Vitreous and the Epinucleus or Cortex
- •7.2.4 Different Techniques Other than Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Nuclear Loss in Vitreous
- •7.2.5 Pars Plana Vitrectomy
- •7.2.6 Zonulolysis
- •References
- •7.3 How to Deal with Very Hard and Intumescent Cataracts
- •7.3.1 Introduction
- •7.3.2 Types of Cataracts
- •7.3.3 Management of Hard Cataracts Through Biaxial Technique
- •7.3.4 Incision
- •7.3.5 Capsulorrhexis
- •7.3.6 Hydrodissection
- •7.3.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •8. IOL Types and Implantation Techniques
- •8.1 MICS Intraocular Lenses
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Lenses
- •8.1.2.2 ThinOptX MICS IOLs (ThinOptX, Abingdon, VA)
- •8.1.2.3 Akreos MI60 AO Micro Incision IOL (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY)
- •8.1.2.4 IOLtech MICS lens (IOLtech, La Rochelle, France; and Carl Zeiss Meditec, Stuttgard, Germany)
- •8.1.3 Optical Quality of MICS IOLs
- •8.1.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.2 Implantation Techniques
- •8.2.2 Prerequisites to a Sub-2 Injection
- •8.2.3 IOLs Used for Injection Through Microincision
- •8.2.3.1 Material
- •8.2.3.2 Design
- •8.2.3.3 Optic Design
- •8.2.3.4 Haptic Design
- •8.2.3.5 Posterior Barrier (360°)
- •8.2.4 Injectors Meant for Microincision
- •8.2.4.1 Objectives of Injectors Meant for Microincision
- •8.2.4.2 Characteristics of Sub-2 Injectors
- •8.2.4.3 The Cartridges
- •Loading Chambers
- •Injection Tunnels and Cartridge Tips
- •8.2.4.4 The Plunger Tips (or plunger)
- •8.2.4.5 Pushing Systems
- •8.2.4.6 Injector Bodies
- •8.2.4.7 Principal Sub-2 Injectors
- •8.2.5 Visco Elastic Substances and Injection Through Microincision
- •8.2.6 Techniques of Sub-2 Injection
- •8.2.6.2 Incision Construction
- •8.2.6.3 Pressurization of the Anterior Chamber
- •8.2.6.4 Loading the Cartridge
- •8.2.6.5 Loading the Injector
- •8.2.6.6 Insertion of the Plunger Tip
- •8.2.6.7 Injection in the Anterior Chamber
- •8.2.6.8 Positioning the IOL in the Capsular Bag
- •8.2.6.9 Removing the VES
- •8.2.6.10 Thin Roller Injector
- •8.2.6.11 Conclusion
- •Reference
- •8.3 Special Lenses
- •8.3.1 Toric Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery and Refractive Lens Exchange
- •8.3.1.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1.3 T-IOL Calculation
- •8.3.1.4 Current T-IOL Models
- •8.3.1.5 Preoperative Marking
- •8.3.1.6 Clinical Indications
- •8.3.1.7 Custom-Made Lenses
- •8.3.1.8 Conclusion for Practice
- •References
- •8.3.2 Special Lenses: MF
- •8.3.2.1 Discussion
- •8.3.2.2 Conclusion
- •8.3.2.3 Outlook
- •References
- •8.3.3 Special Lenses: Aspheric
- •References
- •8.3.4 Intraocular Lenses to Restore and Preserve Vision Following Cataract Surgery
- •8.3.4.1 Introduction
- •8.3.4.2 Why Filter Blue Light?
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.3 Importance of Blue Light to Cataract and Refractive Lens Exchange Patients
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.4 Quality of Vision with Blue Light Filtering IOLs
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.5 Clinical Experience
- •Summary
- •8.3.4.6 Unresolved Issues and Future Considerations
- •References
- •8.3.5 Microincision Intraocular Lenses: Others
- •8.3.5.1 ThinOptX®
- •8.3.5.2 Smart IOL
- •8.3.5.4 AcriTec
- •8.3.5.5 Akreos
- •8.3.5.7 Rayner
- •8.3.5.8 Injectable Polymers
- •8.3.5.9 Final Comments
- •References
- •9. Outcomes
- •9.1 Safety: MICS versus Coaxial Phaco
- •9.1.1 Introduction
- •9.1.2 Visual Outcomes
- •9.1.3 Incision Damage
- •9.1.4 Corneal Incision Burn
- •9.1.5 Corneal Changes
- •9.1.6 Infection
- •9.1.7 Summary
- •References
- •9.2 Control of Corneal Astigmatism and Aberrations
- •9.2.1 Introduction: Impacts of MICS Incision on the Outcomes of Cataract Surgery
- •9.2.2 Objective Evaluation of Corneal Incision
- •9.2.3 Control of Corneal Aberration and Astigmatism with MICS
- •9.2.4 Role of Corneal Aberrometry in Evaluating MICS Incision
- •9.2.5 Role of OCT in Evaluating MICS Incision
- •9.2.6 Our Experience in Corneal Aberrations and Astigmatism After MICS
- •9.2.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.3 Corneal Endothelium and Other Safety Issues
- •9.4 Incision Quality in MICS
- •9.4.1 Introduction: History of Incision Size Reduction
- •9.4.2 The Trends Towards Microincision Cataract Surgery (BMICS)
- •9.4.3 Advantages of Minimizing the Incision Size
- •9.4.4 Model for the Analysis of Corneal Incision Quality [21]
- •9.4.5 Our Protocol for Evaluation of Incision Quality in BMICS [21]
- •9.4.6 Results
- •9.4.6.1 Visual, Refractive and Biomicroscopic Outcomes
- •9.4.6.2 Incision Imaging (OCT) Outcomes
- •9.4.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •INDEX
164 |
I. H. Fine et. al. |
Fig. 7.1 Hydrodelineation of a posterior polar cataract |
Fig. 7.2 Phacoemulsification of a subluxed cataract in the ante- |
|
rior chamber |
pie-shaped segments and evacuated from the eye. Once the endonucleus is removed, the epinucleus is viscodissected from its position against the cortex without removing the irrigating chopper. In this way, there is a layer of cortex and Viscoat® under the epinucleus at the time of evacuation, so that, even if the the capsule opens, it is less likely for the lens material to spill into the vitreous. Once the epinucleus is gone, we leave the irrigation system in the eye, remove the phaco needle, and add Viscoat®. We viscodissect the cortex up into the plain of the capsulorhexis, in the same way and remove it while having a thick layer of viscoelastic on top of the fragile posterior capsule. We never polish the posterior segment of the capsule prior to the IOL implantation, but would rely on YAG laser if there were visually significant opacities within the visual axis, post-operatively
7.3Posterior Subluxed Cataracts
(Fig. 7.2)
For posterior subluxed cataracts, which are hinged to a small zone of attached zonules, a pars plana incision is made and the lens is prolapsed in its capsule, up into the anterior chamber, and the Viscoat® is added under the lens. The lens is then phacoed with biaxial microincision instrumentation utilizing an irrigating cannula in the left hand and a phaco needle in the right, keeping the irrigation on top of the Viscoat® but below the cataract. Disassembling these cataracts is not attempted, but they are phacoed from the outside, in. In general,
with irrigation under the nuclear material, there is a system in which there is fluid circulating in a circuitous pattern on top of the Viscoat® and the chips that are liberated from the mass of the nucleus tend to circulate entirely within the anterior segment and do not get deposited into the vitreous. After the removal of the cataract, a partial anterior vitrectomy is done and a foldable IOL is implanted through a 2.5-mm incision, with the haptics under the iris and the optic on top. This allows the haptics to indent the undersurface of the iris and be easily identifiable. The haptics are then sutured to the iris and the optic is nudged beneath the pupillary margin. There had been a great success with this technique.
7.4Mature Cataract with Zonular Dialysis (Fig. 7.3)
In cases in which there is a dialysis of the zonular apparatus during phacoemulsification, as in a case of unrecognized pseudoexfoliation in the presence of a dense cataract, the nucleus is held with the phaco tip and the irrigating chopper is removed. The Viscoat® is then placed under the lens, and then is put the irrigating handpiece without a chopper, under the lens and the lens is again phacoed entirely within the plain of the capsulorhexis. Nuclear material can be mobilized from the posterior chamber with an unsleeved phaco tip because there is no irrigation going along with the phaco tip, as in coaxial phaco, which would force the nuclear material into the vitreous cavity. This is not
7 Biaxial Microincision Phacoemulsification for Difficult and Challenging Cases |
165 |
Fig. 7.3 Bringing nuclear material out of the posterior chamber with an unsleeved phaco tip in the presence of zonular dialysis
Fig. 7.4 Completing phacoemulsification in the presence of a punctured posterior capsule
possible with a coaxial phaco tip. In these cases, chips that circulate in the fluid above the Viscoat® which is sitting on top of the vitreous are seen, but chips that move posteriorly are not seen. Once this has been completed, a biaxial microincision partial anterior vitrectomy, or a pars plana 25 gauge transcleral microincision vitrectomy is done, and an anterior chamber lens is implanted or a posterior chamber lens is implanted, and sutured to the iris.
7.5Punctured Posterior Capsule
(Fig. 7.4)
In the case where the capsule is punctured during the course of phacoemulsification, irrigation can be continued high in the anterior chamber and the endolenticular space can be reentered with the unsleeved phaco tip, and the phacoemulsification is completed without further enlarging the puncture in the posterior capsule. The cortex is removed without removing the irrigator, and more Viscoat® is instilled. The lens is then implanted into the capsular bag or into the ciliary sulcus. Residual Viscoat® is removed with a vitrector to avoid the possibility of bringing vitreous to the wound. This procedure would be impossible with a coaxial phaco tip because a continuously changing fluid wave from the phaco sleeve would enlarge, or extend, the capsular tear out to the periphery of the capsule, with the loss of lens material into the vitreous.
Fig. 7.5 Holding the Nucleus with an unsleeved phaco tip prior to removing the chopper and adding Viscoat® under the nucleus in the presence of a large posterior capsule rupture
7.6Posterior Capsule Rupture
(Figs. 7.5 and 7.6)
In an extensive posterior capsule rupture, the entire endonucleus is brought up into the anterior chamber by holding it with the phaco tip. Very little fluid leaks out of the incision while removing the irrigating chopper. Viscoat® is placed under the nucleus, and the irrigator is placed under the lens. Phacoemulsification is continued in the plain of the capsulorhexis or in the anterior chamber, with the irrigator beneath the nucleus and it is carouselled, or phacoed, from outside in.
166 |
I. H. Fine et. al. |
Fig. 7.6 Irrigating below the cataract in the presence of a cap- |
Fig. 7.7 Injection of a capsule tension ring through a microinci- |
sule rupture |
sion controlled by a Lester hook in the right hand |
Cortical clean-up is continued in a similar manner, or a partial anterior vitrectomy is performed first, either through the pars plana, or through side-port incisions biaxially. Once all the residual cortex has been removed, a posterior chamber lens is implanted into the ciliary sulcus.
7.7 Pseudoexfoliation (Fig. 7.7)
In postfiltration surgery, in the presence of pseudoexfoliation, an endocapsular tension ring that can be introduced through a side-port with an injector is used, following gentle cortical cleaving hydrodissection. The injector doesn’t enter the incision and is just held against the incision, and the forces on the capsule, as the endocapsular tension ring is being inserted, are contained by the use of a Lester hook in the opposite hand (Fig. 7.7). Biaxial microincision horizontal chopping of the lens is then performed so as not to add any downward force on the lens which might stress the residual zonules. Cortical clean-up is facilitated in the presence of an endocapsular tension ring, by performing gentle cortical cleaving hydrodissection prior to the implantation of the ring. The lens is then implanted into the capsular bag through an incision between the two side-port incisions, which is a routine method for IOL implantation in the presence of two 1.1 mm phacoemulsification incisions.
7.8 Rock-Hard Nuclei (Fig. 7.8)
Rock-hard nuclei can be phacoemulsified with the same facility and ease with which biaxial microincision phacoemulsification of softer nuclei is carried out, and usually ends up with an average phaco power under 10% and effective phaco time under 10 seconds, in spite of the density of these nuclei. This is an enormous advantage in terms of corneal endothelial protection because of the great stability of the anterior chamber. A 30° phacoemulsification tip is used with the bevel down. This allows the achievement of vacuum once the tip touches the endonucleus. A bevel-up tip must go deeply into the nucleus before occlusion
Fig. 7.8 Chopping a rock hard nucleus
7 Biaxial Microincision Phacoemulsification for Difficult and Challenging Cases |
167 |
and vacuum are achieved. With a bevel-down tip, all of the energy is directed toward the nucleus and none toward the corneal endothelium or trabecular meshwork. Finally, pie-shaped segments can be mobilized from the level of the capsulorhexis, up, rather than having to go deeply into the endolenticular space to achieve occlusion to mobilize these segments, as with that of a bevel-up configuration.
7.9 Switching Hands (Fig. 7.9)
In cases of zonular dialysis, another advantage of biaxial microincision phacoemulsification is that the phaco tip can be used with either hand. After inserting an endocapsular tension ring through one of the microincisions, the lens should be hydroexpressed into the plain of the capsulorhexis and then the phaco tip should be utilized in either the right or left hand, depending on the location of the zonular dialysis. For dialyses that are on the operating surgeon’s right side, the phaco tip should be used in the right hand, drawing material in the anterior chamber toward the area of weakened zonules, rather than away from it, which would stress the intact zonules. For dialyses that are on the left-hand side, the phaco tip should be used in the left hand and the irrigating chopper in the right, to remove the nucleus, thereby closing the zonular dialysis with the activation of flow and vacuum toward the left side.
7.10Microcornea or Microphthalmos
(Fig. 7.10)
For very small eyes, the use of biaxial phacoemulsification is an enormous advantage because the smaller size of the instruments avoids creasing of the cornea, which compromises visualization of intraocular structures. A coaxial tip, which is much larger in size, would indent the cornea while being manipulated and partially obscure the visualization of the intraocular structures. This has turned out to be especially advantageous in cases with a microcornea or a microphthalmic eye, in the presence of an unusually large lens.
7.11Large Iridodialysis and Zonular Defects (Fig. 7.11)
In cases where there are large iris defects and missing zonules, the area is straddled with the microchopper and the phaco tip and the anterior chamber is fractionated with Healon 5 to keep the vitreous back and proceeded in the usual manner. This has been very efficacious and has not resulted in bringing vitreous out of the posterior segment. This is exemplified in the case of a woman who had 100° of ciliary body and iris, except for the pupillary margin, excised in the management of a choroidal/ciliary body malignant melanoma, resulting additionally in fragile and atrophic sclera and conjunctiva at the tumor site.
Fig. 7.9 Phacoemulsification tip in the left hand in the presence of zonular dialysis (surgeon’s perspective)
Fig. 7.10 Microinstruments phacoing a large dense nucleus in an eye with micro cornea and iris coloboma
