Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Mechanisms of the Glaucomas_Shields, Tombran-Tink, Barnstable_2008

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
51.38 Mб
Скачать

150

Paranhos et al.

Although they can appear spontaneously (25%), most cases of carotid-cavernous fistula are caused by cranial trauma. They can also appear after neurological surgical procedures (107).

Although more than 50% of these patients have elevated IOP, the characteristic glaucomatous optic neuropathy is much less common. Ishijima et al. reported that among the 43 patients diagnosed with CCF, a total of 13 patients (14 eyes) showed ocular manifestations (108). CCF was idiopathic in 12 subjects and resulted from head trauma in one. Elevated IOP was observed in 64.3%, with maximum IOP ranging from 22 to 55 mmHg.

Theories of Glaucoma Mechanism

The CCF causes high pressure in the venous system of the orbit and globe similar to pressures in the arterial system. The resulting elevated EVP increases resistance to aqueous humor outflow, resulting in increased IOP and associated open-angle glaucoma. Patients with glaucoma and CCF often present with blood in the Schlemm’s canal although this may also be found in normal eyes, and the gonioscopic findings may be masked by heavy trabecular meshwork pigmentation.

Another mechanism of glaucoma is angle closure due to increased pressure in the vortex veins, leading to a forward displacement of the lens–iris diaphragm (109,110).

Yet another mechanism is neovascular glaucoma, in which neovascularization of the optic disc, rubeosis iridis, and ischemic ocular necrosis are caused by the reduced perfusion pressure in these cases. The patients who typically suffer severe vision loss are those with the ischemic optic neuropathy and chorioretinal dysfunction, including occlusion of the retina central vein (111–114).

Management

The medical treatment is similar to that for open-angle glaucoma; drugs that reduce aqueous production, such as beta blockers, alpha-2 agonists, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Prostaglandins, as previously discussed, may have unique benefits in eyes with elevated EVP. However, medical treatment in these cases is often inadequate.

Fistulization surgery appears to be effective in these cases although they are associated with the higher incidence of choroidal effusion and expulsive hemorrhage with shallow or flat anterior chamber in the face of elevated EVP (115). In some cases, it may be necessary to close the abnormal vascular communication by neuro or vascular surgeons, although this is associated with a risk of apoplexy and stroke (108). Acute angle-closure glaucoma has been reported to develop in association with an oculomotor palsy following neurointervention (116).

IDIOPATHIC ELEVATED EPISCLERAL VENOUS PRESSURE

The glaucoma in this condition is associate with elevated EVP and dilated episcleral veins, without a detectable cause (117–121). Several reports suggest a familial predisposition (120,122,123). Although originally described by Minas and Podos (120), the same entity is termed the Radius–Maumenee syndrome in the German literature (118).

Glaucoma due to idiopathic elevated EVP is rare. Jorgensen and Guthoff (119) studied 64 patients with dilated episcleral vessels, open-angle glaucoma, and elevated

Post-Trabecular Glaucomas

151

EVP and reported that in 10 of the cases they could not detect an explanation for the elevated EVP.

Ocular Features

The glaucoma is usually unilateral or asymmetrical, and the IOP is generally above 30 mmHg (117–121). Gonioscopically, Schlemm’s channel is often filled with blood. Extensive studies have failed to reveal the origin of the elevated EVP, with the only pathologic findings being increased tonographic resistance to outflow and increased arterial and venous episcleral flow on the color-coded Doppler sonography (117,121, 122,124).

Theories of Glaucoma Mechanism

As previously noted, glaucoma secondary to idiopathic EVP, with dilated vessels is typically unilateral or at least asymmetrical. Talusan et al. (122) described seven cases, only one of which was bilateral. In all six patients with apparently unilateral involvement, the IOP was higher in the eye with the dilated vessels, and EVP was measured to be twice the normal value in the affected eyes. Jorgensen and Guthoff described similar results in a study of five patients (125).

Jonas (6) studied ophthalmodynamometry in eyes with dilated episcleral veins and found that the central retinal vein collapses at pressure that was significantly higher in the study group with dilated episcleral veins, than in the control group (p < 0.001) [37.9 ± 33.8 vs. 5.1 ± 8.4 relative units (RU)]. For the central retinal artery, there was no significant difference in the diastolic collapse pressure between the study and control groups (78.2 ± 22.8 vs. 74.2 ± 18.8 RU, respectively; p = 0.74). He suggested that ophthalmodynamometric estimation of the central retina vein collapse pressure might be helpful in the assessment of patients with dilated episcleral veins.

Management

Management of the glaucoma in these patients is difficult although the majority of reports were prior to the introduction of uveoscleral drainage agents, for example, prostaglandins, which may be more effective than aqueous suppressants, as they bypass the episcleral venous drainage. Filtration surgery is frequently required to control the IOP (117) and one suggested alternative approach is non-penetrating, deep sclerectomy (126).

REFERENCES

1.Brubaker RF. Determination of episcleral venous pressure in the eye. A comparison of three methods. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;77(1):110–114.

2.Podos SM, Minas TF, Macri FJ. A new instrument to measure episcleral venous pressure. Comparison of normal eyes and eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;80(2):209–213.

3.Krakau CE, Widakowich J, Wilke K. Measurements of the episcleral venous pressure by means of an air jet. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1973;51(2):185–196.

4.Phelps CD, Armaly MF. Measurement of episcleral venous pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;85(1):35–42.

152

Paranhos et al.

5.Talusan ED, Schwartz B. Episcleral venous pressure. Differences between normal, ocular hypertensive, and primary open angle glaucomas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(5):824–828.

6.Jonas JB. Ophthalmodynamometry in eyes with dilated episcleral veins. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(3):285–287.

7.Prabhakar BS, Bahn RS, Smith TJ. Current perspective on the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease and ophthalmopathy. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(6):802–835.

8.Salvi M, Zhang ZG, Haegert D, et al. Patients with endocrine ophthalmopathy not associated with overt thyroid disease have multiple thyroid immunological abnormalities.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70(1):89–94.

9.Manor RS, Kurz O, Lewitus Z. Intraocular pressure in endocrinological patients with exophthalmos. Ophthalmologica. 1974;168(4):241–252.

10.Algvere P, Almqvist S, Backlund EO. Pterional orbital decompression in progressive ophthalmopathy of Graves’ disease. I. Short-term effects. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1973;51(4):461–474.

11.Haddad HM. Tonography and visual fields in endocrine exophthalmos. Report on 29 patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64(1):63–67.

12.Cockerham KP, Pal C, Jani B, Wolter A, Kennerdell JS. The prevalence and implications of ocular hypertension and glaucoma in thyroid-associated orbitopathy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):914–917.

13.Kalmann R, Mourits MP. Prevalence and management of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with Graves’ orbitopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(7):754–757.

14.Ohtsuka K, Nakamura Y. Open-angle glaucoma associated with Graves disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(5):613–617.

15.Bahn RS. Assessment and management of the patient with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Endocr Pract. 1995;1(3):172–178.

16.Mozherenkov VP, Pirogov AI, Khegai PV. Ophthalmological symptoms in thyrotoxicosis. Med Sestra. 1979;38(8):12–13.

17.Goldberg I. Thyroid eye disease and glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(6):494–496.

18.Danesh-Meyer HV, Savino PJ, Deramo V, Sergott RC, Smith AF. Intraocular pressure changes after treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(1):145–150.

19.Ebright JR, Pace MT, Niazi AF. Septic thrombosis of the cavernous sinuses. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(22):2671–2676.

20.Watkins LM, Pasternack MS, Banks M, Kousoubris P, Rubin PA. Bilateral cavernous sinus thromboses and intraorbital abscesses secondary to Streptococcus milleri. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(3):569–574.

21.Clune JP. Septic Thrombosis within the Cavernous Chamber. Review of the Literature with Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1963;56:33–39.

22.Yarington CT, Jr. Cavernous sinus thrombosis revisited. Proc R Soc Med. 1977;70(7): 456–459.

23.Yarington CT, Jr. The prognosis and treatment of cavernous sinus thrombosis. Review of 878 cases in the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1961;70:263–267.

24.DiNubile MJ. Septic thrombosis of the cavernous sinuses. Arch Neurol. 1988;45(5): 567–572.

25.Stevens J, Robinson K. Chronic cavernous sinus thrombosis: discussion and report of case. J Oral Surg. 1977;35(2):136–139.

26.Melamed E, Rachmilewitz EA, Reches A, Lavy S. Aseptic cavernous sinus thrombosis after internal carotid arterial occlusion in polycythaemia vera. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39(4):320–324.

27.Talks SJ, Salmon JF, Elston JS, Bron AJ. Cavernous-dural fistula with secondary angleclosure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):851–853.

Post-Trabecular Glaucomas

153

28.Chen YC, Cheng TT, Lai HM, Wu CH. Overwhelming septic cavernous sinus thrombosis in a woman after combination of high-dose steroid and intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy for lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2000;9(1):78–79.

29.Kimbrough BO, Young AB, Modica LA. Orbital cellulitis and cavernous sinus thrombosis after cataract extraction and lens implantation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992;24(8):313–317.

30.Palmersheim LA, Hamilton MK. Fatal cavernous sinus thrombosis secondary to third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1982;40(6):371–376.

31.Sadun F, Feldon SE, Weiss MH, Krieger MD. Septic cavernous sinus thrombosis following transsphenoidal craniotomy. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):949–952.

32.de Medeiros CR, Bleggi-Torres LF, Faoro LN, et al. Cavernous sinus thrombosis caused by zygomycosis after unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2001;3(4):231–234.

33.Silver HS, Morris LR. Hypopituitarism secondary to cavernous sinus thrombosis. South Med J. 1983;76(5):642–646.

34.Harrison AR, Wirtschafter JD. Ocular neuromyotonia in a patient with cavernous sinus thrombosis secondary to mucormycosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(1):122–123.

35.Mahapatra AK. Brain abscess–an unusual complication of cavernous sinus thrombosis. A case report. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1988;90(3):241–243.

36.Zahller M, Spector RH, Skoglund RR, Digby D, Nyhan WL. Cavernous sinus thrombosis. West J Med. 1980;133(1):44–48.

37.Mehra KS, Somani PN. Multiple emboli in central retinal artery following cavernous sinus thrombosis. J All India Ophthalmol Soc. 1967;15(2):71–72.

38.Sharma S, Cruess AF. Central retinal vein occlusion associated with cavernous sinus thrombosis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1996;31(5):255–256.

39.Friberg TR, Sogg RL. Ischemic optic neuropathy in cavernous sinus thrombosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(3):453–456.

40.Geggel HS, Isenberg SJ. Cavernous sinus thrombosis as a cause of unilateral blindness. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982;14(6):569–574.

41.Fiandaca MS, Spector RH, Hartmann TM, Braun IF. Unilateral septic cavernous sinus thrombosis. A case report with digital orbital venographic documentation. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1986;6(1):35–38.

42.Levy J, Marcus M, Shelef I, Lifshitz T. Acute angle-closure glaucoma and pupil-involving complete third nerve palsy as presenting signs of thrombosed cavernous sinus aneurysm. Eye. 2004;18(3):325–328.

43.Berge J, Louail C, Caille JM. Cavernous sinus thrombosis diagnostic approach. J Neuroradiol. 1994;21(2):101–117.

44.Solomon OD, Moses L, Volk M. Steroid therapy in cavernous sinus thrombosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1962;54:1122–1124.

45.Johnson DS, Crittenden DJ. Intraocular pressure and mechanical ventilation. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(7):523–527.

46.Fu ER. Bilateral corkscrew episcleral veins from tricuspid incompetence. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122(4):577–578.

47.Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G. Sturge-Weber syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22(8):909–921.

48.Baselga E. Sturge-Weber syndrome. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2004;23(2):87–98.

49.Schirmer R. Ein fall von telangiecktasie. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol.

1860;7:119–121.

50.Sturge W. A case of partial epilepsy apparently due to a lesion of the motor centers of the brain. Trans Clin Soc Lond. 1879;12:112.

51.Weber P. Right-sided hemihypertrophy resulting from right-sided congenital spastic hemiplegia with a morbid condition of the left side of the brain revealed by radiogram. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1922;37:301–311.

154

Paranhos et al.

52.Thomas-Sohl KA, Vaslow DF, Maria BL. Sturge-Weber syndrome: a review. Pediatr Neurol. 2004;30(5):303–310.

53.Welty LD. Sturge-Weber syndrome: a case study. Neonatal Netw. 2006;25(2):89–98.

54.Comi AM. Pathophysiology of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2003;18(8): 509–516.

55.Kossoff EH, Hatfield LA, Ball KL, Comi AM. Comorbidity of epilepsy and headache in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2005;20(8):678–682.

56.Taddeucci G, Bonuccelli A, Polacco P. Migraine-like attacks in child with Sturge-Weber syndrome without facial nevus. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;32(2):131–133.

57.Kelley TM, Hatfield LA, Lin DD, Comi AM. Quantitative analysis of cerebral cortical atrophy and correlation with clinical severity in unilateral Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2005;20(11):867–870.

58.Comi AM. Advances in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19(2):124–128.

59.Celebi S, Alagoz G, Aykan U. Ocular findings in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000;10(3):239–243.

60.Sullivan TJ, Clarke MP, Morin JD. The ocular manifestations of the Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1992;29(6):349–356.

61.Singh AD, Kaiser PK, Sears JE. Choroidal hemangioma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005;18(1):151–161, ix.

62.Awad AH, Mullaney PB, Al-Mesfer S, Zwaan JT. Glaucoma in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J AAPOS. 1999;3(1):40–45.

63.Susac JO, Smith JL, Scelfo RJ. The “tomatoe-catsup” fundus in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;92(1):69–70.

64.Lee H, Choi SS, Kim SS, Hong YJ. A case of glaucoma associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome and Nevus of Ota. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2001;15(1):48–53.

65.Recupero SM, Abdolrahimzadeh S, De Dominicis M, Mollo R. Sturge-Weber syndrome associated with naevus of Ota. Eye. 1998;12(Pt 2):212–213.

66.Verma L, Kumar A, Garg SP, Khosla PK. Iris neovascularization in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1991;39(2):82–83.

67.van Emelen C, Goethals M, Dralands L, Casteels I. Treatment of glaucoma in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000;37(1):29–34.

68.Filatov V, Guyer DR, Lustbader JM, Berkow JW. Dislocation of the crystalline lens in a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992;24(7):260–262.

69.Sakai H, Sakima N, Nakamura Y, Nakamura Y, Hayakawa K, Sawaguchi S. Ciliochoroidal effusion induced by topical latanoprost in a patient with sturge-weber syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2002;46(5):553–555.

70.Cronemberger SC, Calixto N, Assunção DAM, Milhomens EG. Sturge-Weber syndrome: ultrasound biomicroscopic study. Arq Oftalmol. 2004;67:211–217.

71.Sihota R, Gupta V, Agarwal HC. Ultrasound biomicroscopic evaluation in Sturge Weber syndrome without glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(4):408–409.

72.Kranemann CF, Pavlin CJ, Trope GE. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in Sturge-Weber- associated glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(1):119–121.

73.Sadda SR, Miller NR, Tamargo R, Wityk R. Bilateral optic neuropathy associated with diffuse cerebral angiomatosis in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Neuroophthalmol. 2000;20(1):28–31.

74.Phelps CD. The pathogenesis of glaucoma in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1978;85(3):276–286.

75.Mwinula JH, Sagawa T, Tawara A, Inomata H. Anterior chamber angle vascularization in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Report of a case. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232(7):387–391.

Post-Trabecular Glaucomas

155

76.Akabane N, Hamanaka T. Histopathological study of a case with glaucoma due to SturgeWeber syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47(2):151–157.

77.Mandal AK. Primary combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy for early-onset glaucoma in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(8):1621–1627.

78.Irkec M, Kiratli H, Bilgic S. Results of trabeculotomy and guarded filtration procedure for glaucoma associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1999;9(2):99–102.

79.Hoskins HD, Jr., Shaffer RN, Hetherington J. Goniotomy vs trabeculotomy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1984;21(4):153–158.

80.Board RJ, Shields MB. Combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy for the management of glaucoma associated wih Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmic Surg. 1981;12(11): 813–817.

81.Ali MA, Fahmy IA, Spaeth GL. Trabeculectomy for glaucoma associated with SturgeWeber syndrome. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;21(5):352–355.

82.Keverline PO, Hiles DA. Trabeculectomy for adolescent onset glaucoma in the SturgeWeber syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol. 1976;13(3):144–148.

83.Shihab ZM, Kristan RW. Recurrent intraoperative choroidal effusion in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1983;20(6):250–252.

84.Christensen GR, Records RE. Glaucoma and expulsive hemorrhage mechanisms in the Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1979;86(7):1360–1366.

85.Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Lichter PR, Del Monte MA, et al. Assessing the need for posterior sclerotomy at the time of filtering surgery in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(7):1361–1363.

86.Budenz DL, Sakamoto D, Eliezer R, Varma R, Heuer DK. Two-staged Baerveldt glaucoma implant for childhood glaucoma associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(11):2105–2110.

87.Hamush NG, Coleman AL, Wilson MR. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant for management of glaucoma in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(6):758–760.

88.Kirwan JF, Shah P, Khaw PT. Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation: role in the management of refractory pediatric glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(2):316–323.

89.Naesens R, Mestdagh C, Breemersch M, Defreyne L. Direct carotid-cavernous fistula: a case report and review of the literature. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2006(299):43–54.

90.American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Arteriovenous fistulae of the CNS. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(8 Suppl):S22–25.

91.Xavier J, Cruz R, Stocker A, Vasconcelos C, Reis J, Almeida-Pinto J. Dural fistulas of the anterior cranial fossa. Acta Med Port. 2001;14(1):71–75.

92.Feiner L, Bennett J, Volpe NJ. Cavernous sinus fistulas: carotid cavernous fistulas and dural arteriovenous malformations. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2003;3(5):415–420.

93.Selbach JM, Posielek K, Steuhl KP, Kremmer S. Episcleral venous pressure in untreated primary open-angle and normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219(6): 357–361.

94.Mobius E, Berg-Dammer E, Kuhne D, de Silva RD. Clinical aspects and treatment of spontaneous carotid artery-cavernous sinus fistula. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1989;57(12):518–526.

95.van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN. Ruptured cavernous sinus aneurysms causing carotid cavernous fistula: incidence, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(1):185–189.

96.Anderson K, Collie DA, Capewell A. CT angiographic appearances of carotico-cavernous fistula. Clin Radiol. 2001;56(6):514–516.

97.Chen CC, Chang PC, Shy CG, Chen WS, Hung HC. CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of carotid cavernous sinus fistula prior to embolization: a comparison of techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(9):2349–2356.

156

Paranhos et al.

98.Wu Z, Yang H. Color Doppler imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 1993;9(3):153–157.

99.Takaya Y. 3 D-MRA of idiopathic carotid-cavernous fistula. No To Shinkei. 2000; 52(12):1122–1123.

100.Duan Y, Liu X, Zhou X, Cao T, Ruan L, Zhao Y. Diagnosis and follow-up study of carotid cavernous fistulas with color Doppler ultrasonography: analysis of 33 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(6):739–745.

101.Ikawa F, Uozumi T, Kiya K, Kurisu K, Arita K, Sumida M. Diagnosis of carotid-cavernous fistulas with magnetic resonance angiography–demonstrating the draining veins utilizing 3-D time-of-flight and 3-D phase-contrast techniques. Neurosurg Rev. 1996;19(1):7–12.

102.Theaudin M, Saint-Maurice JP, Chapot R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of dural carotidcavernous fistulae: a consecutive series of 27 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(2):174–179.

103.Phillips PH. Carotid-cavernous fistulas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1999;10(4):653–665, ix.

104.Biousse V, Mendicino ME, Simon DJ, Newman NJ. The ophthalmology of intracranial vascular abnormalities. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(4):527–544.

105.de Keizer R. Carotid-cavernous and orbital arteriovenous fistulas: ocular features, diagnostic and hemodynamic considerations in relation to visual impairment and morbidity. Orbit. 2003;22(2):121–142.

106.Acierno MD, Trobe JD, Cornblath WT, Gebarski SS. Painful oculomotor palsy caused by posterior-draining dural carotid cavernous fistulas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(8): 1045–1049.

107.Keltner JL, Satterfield D, Dublin AB, Lee BC. Dural and carotid cavernous sinus fistulas. Diagnosis, management, and complications. Ophthalmology. 1987;94(12):1585–1600.

108.Ishijima K, Kashiwagi K, Nakano K, Shibuya T, Tsumura T, Tsukahara S. Ocular manifestations and prognosis of secondary glaucoma in patients with carotid-cavernous fistula. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47(6):603–608.

109.Buus DR, Tse DT, Parrish RK, II. Spontaneous carotid cavernous fistula presenting with acute angle closure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(4):596–597.

110.Harris GJ, Rice PR. Angle closure

111.in carotid-cavernous fistula. Ophthalmology. 1979;86(8):1521–1529.

112.Miller NR. Severe vision loss and neovascular glaucoma complicating superior ophthalmic vein approach to carotid-cavernous sinus fistula. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(6):883–884.

113.Gupta N, Kikkawa DO, Levi L, Weinreb RN. Severe vision loss and neovascular glaucoma complicating superior ophthalmic vein approach to carotid-cavernous sinus fistula. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):853–855.

114.Fiore PM, Latina MA, Shingleton BJ, Rizzo JF, Ebert E, Bellows AR. The dural shunt syndrome. I. Management of glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(1):56–62.

115.Sugar HS. Neovascular glaucoma after carotid-cavernous fistula formation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1979;11(11):1667–1669.

116.Bellows AR, Chylack LT, Jr., Hutchinson BT. Choroidal detachment. Clinical manifestation, therapy and mechanism of formation. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(11):1107–1115.

117.Komiyama M, Morikawa T, Matsusaka Y, Yasui T, Shimizu H. Acute angle-closure glaucoma after successful embolization of traumatic carotid-cavernous sinus fistula–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2003;43(3):142–145.

118.Foroozan R, Buono LM, Savino PJ, Sergott RC. Idiopathic dilated episcleral veins and increased intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(5):652–654.

119.Groh MJ, Kuchle M. Idiopathic episcleral venous stasis with secondary open-angle glaucoma (Radius-Maumenee syndrome). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1997;211(2): 131–132.

Post-Trabecular Glaucomas

157

120.Jorgensen JS, Guthoff R. The role of episcleral venous pressure in the development of secondary glaucomas. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1988;193(5):471–475.

121.Minas TF, Podos SM. Familial glaucoma associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;80(2):202–208.

122.Radius RL, Maumenee AE. Dilated episcleral vessels and open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86(1):31–35.

123.Talusan ED, Fishbein SL, Schwartz B. Increased pressure of dilated episcleral veins with open-angle glaucoma without exophthalmos. Ophthalmology. 1983;90(3):257–265.

124.Bigger JF. Glaucoma with elevated episcleral venous pressure. South Med J. 1975;68(11):1444–1448.

125.Lanzl IM, Welge-Luessen U, Spaeth GL. Unilateral open-angle glaucoma secondary to idiopathic dilated episcleral veins. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121(5):587–589.

126.Jorgensen JS, Guthoff R. Pathogenesis of unilateral dilated episcleral vessels and increase in intraocular pressure. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1987;190(5):428–430.

10

Angle-Closure Glaucomas

Anterior (Pulling) Mechanisms

Malik Y. Kahook, md, and Joel S. Schuman, md

CONTENTS

Introduction

Post-inflammatory Angle-Closure Glaucoma

Proliferative Causes of Angle-Closure Glaucoma

Conclusion

References

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge regarding the anatomy and physiology of the drainage angle has evolved since the introduction of Barkan’s seminal description of gonioscopic examination in 1938 (1). While most cases of glaucoma are classified as primary open angle with normal appearing anterior chamber angles, a subgroup of glaucomas involves narrowing of the angle through an anterior pulling mechanism. Most cases of angleclosure glaucoma (ACG) involving anterior pulling mechanisms are due to local chronic inflammation or cellular proliferation. Chronic inflammatory conditions such as anterior uveitis, trabeculitis, and infectious etiologies lead to trabecular meshwork and iris swelling. Inflammatory cells deposit along the angle and on the surface of the cornea and iris leading to adhesions and eventual formation of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS). PAS formation and contraction represents the final common denominator leading to angle closure in inflammatory cases. Once PAS is formed, the angle becomes compromised through direct obstruction by these tissue membranes and/or through apposition of the iris to the drainage angle and cornea.

Cellular proliferation, the second cause of anterior pulling angle closure, is most often due to fibrovascular membrane growth related to neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Other less common causes of proliferation of cells in the angle include iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndromes and epithelial ingrowth after penetrating surgery or trauma. We will address the most common mechanisms of anterior pulling ACG and expand on known pathophysiology for each form.

From: Ophthalmology Research: Mechanisms of the Glaucomas

Edited by: J. Tombran-Tink, C. J. Barnstable, and M. B. Shields © Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

159

160

Kahook and Schuman

POST-INFLAMMATORY ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA

Iridocyclitis

Iridocyclitis is one of the main causes of PAS often resulting from idiopathic disease (2). Identifiable diseases typically resulting in iridocyclitis include ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, interstitial keratitis, sarcoidosis, pars planitis, and uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome. Most cases of iridocyclitis are acute and selflimiting. Anterior synechiae do not usually form in these cases unless repeated episodes lead to the adhesions between the iris and trabecular meshwork–cornea complex. Recurrent subacute or chronic iridocyclitis, on the other hand, is much more likely to lead to iris and trabecular meshwork swelling with eventual PAS. Once PAS covers over 25% of the angle, aqueous outflow is frequently compromised and intraocular pressure (IOP) becomes elevated. In the subacute form, ocular examination may appear normal until gonioscopy reveals PAS. Attacks of elevated IOP may go unnoticed and be mistaken for migraines or stress headaches. The chronic form of iridocyclitis typically leads to sustained elevation of IOP, and patients often present with significant angle closure and optic neuropathy because of long-standing disease. These patients often fail medical therapy for IOP control and require filtration surgery.

Infectious Iridocyclitis

Synechiae formation may be associated with infectious keratitis, congenital infectious iridocyclitis, or disseminated ocular infections as in endophthalmitis. Common pathogens involved with anterior segment inflammation and PAS formation include herpes simplex, herpes zoster, and toxoplasmosis (3–5). The ultimate mechanism leading to drainage angle disruption is formation of PAS as a result of tissue swelling and deposition of inflammatory cells. Adhesions then form between iris and cornea leading to decreased aqueous outflow and IOP elevation. Early control of infection and inflammatory response lessens the chance of PAS formation.

Grant’s Syndrome

A form of acute open-angle glaucoma involving keratic precipitates (KPs) over the trabecular meshwork was described by Chandler and Grant (6). They noted gonioscopic evidence of gray or yellowish KPs associated with elevated IOP in otherwise quiet appearing eyes. The presentation is usually bilateral and resolves promptly with topical steroid drops. Recurring episodes could lead to synechiae formation and angle closure.

Traumatic Iridocyclitis

Ocular trauma may lead to elevation in IOP due to iridocyclitis and swelling of the trabecular meshwork cells. This is usually a transient phenomenon with no lasting sequelae. In more severe trauma, and particularly in cases involving hyphema, chronic inflammation may lead to PAS formation and eventual angle closure (7). Early treatment with topical steroids may decrease the incidence and severity of PAS formation.

A second anterior pulling mechanism of angle closure following trauma has been described. This form involves the formation of a Descemet’s-like membrane over the