- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Blepharoplasty
- •1.3 Forehead Lift
- •1.4 Midface
- •1.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Facial Proportions
- •2.3 Forehead
- •2.4 Eyebrows
- •2.5 Eyelid
- •2.5.1 Topography
- •2.5.2 Lamellae
- •2.5.3 Upper Eyelid Retractors
- •2.5.4 Tarsus
- •2.5.5 Lower Eyelid
- •2.6 Midface
- •2.6.1 Topography
- •2.6.2 Soft Tissue Lamellae
- •2.6.3 Nasojugal Groove
- •2.6.4 Malar Region
- •2.6.5 Nasolabial Region
- •2.7 Facial Vasculature, Innervation, and Lymphatic Drainage
- •2.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Specific Anatomic Subunits
- •3.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3 Examination of the Brow and Upper Eyelid Continuum
- •4.4 Examination of the Lower Eyelid and Cheek Continuum
- •4.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •5: Oculofacial Anesthesia
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Topical Anesthesia
- •5.2.1 Eye Drops
- •5.2.2 Topical Skin Creams
- •5.3 Local Injectable Anesthesia
- •5.4 Tumescent Anesthesia
- •5.5 Oral Sedation
- •5.6 Monitored Anesthesia Care
- •5.7 General Anesthesia
- •5.8 Issues for Consideration
- •5.9 Postoperative Care
- •5.10 Regional Nerve Blocks
- •5.11 Sensory Blocks
- •5.12 Conclusion
- •References
- •6: The Open Approach to Forehead Lifting
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Background
- •6.3 Anatomy
- •6.4 Preoperative Assessment
- •6.5 Technique
- •6.6 Postoperative Care
- •6.7 Complications
- •6.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Forehead and Temporal Anatomy
- •7.3 Aesthetics and Aging
- •7.4 Patient Selection
- •7.5 Instrumentation
- •7.5.1 Technique
- •7.5.2 Complications
- •7.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •8: Direct Brow Lift: An Aesthetic Approach
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Direct Eyebrow Lift
- •8.3 The Limited Lateral Supraciliary Eyebrow Lift Procedure
- •8.5 Scar Management
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9: Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Anatomic Eyelid and Periorbital Considerations
- •9.3 Assessing Patients’ Concerns
- •9.4 Patient History
- •9.5 Patient Examination
- •9.6 Preparation for Surgery
- •9.7 Anesthesia
- •9.8 The Surgical Prep
- •9.9 The Surgery
- •9.10 Postoperative Management
- •9.11 Complications
- •9.12 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Anatomical Considerations and Preoperative Evaluation
- •10.3 Internal Brow Fat Sculpting and Elevation
- •10.3.1 Surgical Technique
- •10.4 Glabellar Myectomy
- •10.4.1 Surgical Technique
- •10.5 Lacrimal Gland Prolapse
- •10.5.1 Surgical Technique
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Complications
- •11.2.1 Hemorrhage
- •11.2.1.1 Eyelid Hematoma
- •Medical Management
- •Surgical Management
- •11.2.1.2 Retrobulbar/Intraorbital Hemorrhage
- •Medical Management
- •Surgical Management
- •11.2.2 Vision Loss
- •11.2.2.1 Orbital Compartment Syndrome
- •11.2.2.2 Globe Rupture/Perforation
- •Medical Management
- •Surgical Management
- •11.2.2.3 Corneal Abrasion
- •Medical Management
- •Surgical Management
- •11.2.3 Infection
- •11.2.3.1 Medical Management
- •11.2.3.2 Surgical Management
- •11.3 Surgical Complications
- •11.3.1 Lagophthalmos
- •11.3.1.1 Medical Management
- •11.3.1.2 Surgical Management
- •11.3.2 Dry Eye Syndrome
- •11.3.2.1 Medical Management
- •11.3.2.2 Surgical Management
- •11.3.3 Lacrimal Gland Injury
- •11.3.3.1 Medical Management
- •11.3.3.2 Surgical Management
- •11.3.4 Ptosis
- •11.3.4.1 Medical Management
- •11.3.4.2 Surgical Management
- •11.3.5 Diplopia
- •11.3.5.1 Medical Management
- •11.3.5.2 Surgical Management
- •11.3.6 Sulcus Deformity
- •11.3.6.1 Medical Management
- •11.3.6.2 Surgical Management
- •11.4 Incision Irregularities
- •11.4.1 Canthal Webbing
- •11.4.1.1 Medical Management
- •11.4.1.2 Surgical Management
- •11.4.2 Scarring
- •11.4.2.1 Medical Management
- •11.4.2.2 Surgical Management
- •11.4.3 Suture Milia
- •11.4.3.1 Medical Management
- •11.4.3.2 Surgical Management
- •11.5 Asymmetry
- •11.5.1 Lid Crease and Fold
- •11.5.1.1 Medical Management
- •11.5.1.2 Surgical Management
- •11.5.2 Skin
- •11.5.2.1 Medical Management
- •11.5.2.2 Surgical Correction
- •11.5.3.1 Medical Management
- •11.5.3.2 Surgical Management
- •11.5.4 Brow Position
- •11.5.4.1 Medical Management
- •11.5.4.2 Surgical Treatment
- •11.5.5 Undercorrection/Overcorrection
- •11.5.5.1 Medical Management
- •11.5.5.2 Surgical Management
- •11.6 Unrealized Patient Expectations
- •11.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Ptosis Repair: Which Approach?
- •12.3 Patient Evaluation
- •12.4 Anatomy
- •12.5 Procedure
- •12.6 Complications
- •12.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Preoperative Evaluation
- •13.2.1 Degree of Eyelid Ptosis
- •13.2.2 Levator Muscle Function
- •13.2.3 Phenylephrine Test
- •13.3 Anesthesia
- •13.4 Surgical Technique
- •13.4.1 Step 1: Eyelid Marking for Upper Blepharoplasty
- •13.4.2 Step 2: Instilling Local Anesthetic for Upper Blepharoplasty
- •13.4.3 Step 3: Performing the Frontal Block
- •13.4.4 Step 4: Placement of the Traction Suture
- •13.4.5 Step 5: Measuring Amount of Resection
- •13.4.6 Step 6: Separation of Conjunctiva and Müller’s Muscle
- •13.4.7 Step 7: Placement of the Ptosis Clamp
- •13.4.8 Step 8: Preventing Inappropriate Ptosis Clamp Placement
- •13.4.9 Step 9: Passage of Suture
- •13.4.10 Step 10: Excision of Conjunctiva and Müller’s Muscle
- •13.4.11 Step 11: Closure of Conjunctival Wound
- •13.4.12 Step 12: Burying the Suture Knot
- •13.4.13 Step 13: Completion of Upper Blepharoplasty
- •13.5 Postoperative Management
- •13.6 Complications
- •13.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Anatomic Considerations of the Asian Upper Eyelid
- •14.2.1 Musculature
- •14.2.2 Orbital Septum
- •14.2.3 Orbital Fat
- •14.2.4 Levator Palpebrae Superioris
- •14.3 Modern Management of the Upper Eyelid
- •14.5 Strategies for the Aging Asian Eyelid
- •14.5.1 Asians with a Natural Crease
- •14.5.2 Asians Without a Crease
- •14.5.3 Asians with Prior Surgery for Supratarsal Crease Formation
- •14.6 Eyelid Crease Formation
- •14.6.1 Preoperative Eye Evaluation and Crease Positioning
- •14.6.2 Surgical Marking
- •14.6.3 Anesthesia
- •14.6.4 Surgical Technique
- •14.6.4.1 Levator-to-Skin Fixation
- •14.6.5 Postoperative Care
- •14.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Patient Selection
- •15.3 Patient Examination
- •15.4 Eyelid Position and Laxity
- •15.5 Revision Patients
- •15.6 Festoons and Malar Edema
- •15.7 Patient Expectations and Psychology
- •15.8 Important Surgical Anatomy
- •15.9 Operative Technique
- •15.10 Fat Transposition
- •15.11 Lower Eyelid Tightening
- •15.12 Skin Resurfacing
- •15.13 Postoperative Care
- •15.14 Complications and Management
- •15.14.1 Milia
- •15.14.2 Dry Eye/Chemosis
- •15.14.3 Hematoma
- •15.14.4 Eyelid Malposition/Ectropion
- •15.15 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Lower Eyelid Anatomy
- •16.3 Eyelid Analysis/Preoperative Evaluation
- •16.5 Postoperative Care
- •16.6 Complications
- •16.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Canthal Anatomy
- •17.3 Patient Evaluation for Canthal Surgery
- •17.4 Surgical Techniques
- •17.4.1 Canthoplasty (Lateral Tarsal Strip)
- •17.4.2 Modified Canthoplasty
- •17.4.3 Canthopexy (Muscle suspension)
- •17.4.4 The Prominent Globe
- •17.5 Postoperative Care
- •17.6 Complications
- •17.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Anatomy of the Eyelid and Cheek
- •18.4 Presentation
- •18.5 Preoperative Evaluation
- •18.6 Surgical Procedures
- •18.7 Surgical Technique
- •18.7.1 Scar Lysis and Mobilization
- •18.7.2 Midface Elevation
- •18.7.3 Graft Placement
- •18.7.4 Lateral Canthal Resuspension
- •18.7.5 Eyelid Splinting and Casting
- •18.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •19: Laser Management of Festoons
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Laser Tissue Interactions
- •19.4 Treatment Protocols
- •19.5 Complications
- •19.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •20: Midface and Lower Eyelid Rejuvenation
- •20.1 Introduction
- •20.2 The Midface
- •20.3 Why I Prefer the Subperiosteal Face Lift
- •20.4 Patient Selection
- •20.5 Indications
- •20.6 Preoperative Preparation
- •20.7 Aesthetic Considerations
- •20.8 Technique
- •20.9 Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty
- •20.10 Fat Grafting
- •20.12 Summary
- •References
- •21: Face Implants in Aesthetic Surgery
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Midface Treatment Options
- •21.3 Diagnosis and Implant Selection
- •21.4 Surgical Procedure
- •21.5 Postoperative Care and Healing
- •21.6 Implant Complications
- •21.7 Conclusion
- •21.8 Case Presentations
- •References
- •22: Periorbital Fat Grafting
- •22.1 Introduction
- •22.2 Analysis
- •22.2.1 Lower Eyelid
- •22.2.2 Upper Eyelid
- •22.3 Volume Source: Fat Versus Filler
- •22.4 Surgical Technique
- •22.4.1 General Considerations
- •22.4.2 Fat Harvest
- •22.4.3 Fat Processing
- •22.4.4 Fat Injection
- •22.5 Postoperative Considerations
- •22.6 Complications
- •22.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •23: Periorbital Laser Resurfacing
- •23.1 Introduction
- •23.2 History
- •23.3 Use of Resurfacing Lasers for Periorbital Resurfacing
- •23.4 Traditional Ablative Laser Resurfacing
- •23.7 Fractionated Laser Resurfacing
- •23.8 Technical Considerations: Nonablative Fractionated Laser
- •23.9 Posttreatment Care for Nonablative Fractionated Laser
- •23.10 Conclusion
- •24: Laser Incisional Eyelid Surgery
- •24.1 Introduction
- •24.2 History
- •24.3 Laser Incisions
- •24.4 Laser Safety
- •24.5 Upper Blepharoplasty
- •24.6 Lower Lid Transconjunctival Blepharoplasty
- •24.7 Ptosis Repair
- •24.8 Direct Brow Lift
- •24.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.2 Review of Neuromodulators and Fillers: The Products
- •25.3 Treatments
- •25.3.1 Lateral Orbital Rhytids (Crow’s Feet)
- •25.3.2 Glabellar Complex
- •25.3.3 Frontalis Muscle
- •25.3.4 Nasojugal Groove/Tear Trough
- •25.4 Avoiding and Managing Complications
- •25.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •26: Management of the Prominent Eye
- •26.1 Introduction
- •26.2 Anatomic Associations of the Prominent Eye
- •26.3 Surgical Treatment of the Prominent Eye
- •26.3.1 Orbital Decompression Surgery
- •26.3.2 Cheek/Orbital Rim Implants
- •26.3.3 Repair of Eyelid Retraction
- •26.3.4 Upper Lid Retraction
- •26.3.5 Lower Lid Retraction
- •26.4 Cosmetic Treatment of the Tear Trough in the Prominent Eye
- •26.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •27.1 Introduction
- •27.2 Anti-metabolites
- •27.3 5-Fluorouracil
- •27.3.1 Mechanism of Action
- •27.3.2 Management
- •27.3.3 Safety
- •27.4 Corticosteroids
- •27.4.1 Mechanism of Action
- •27.4.2 Management
- •27.4.3 Safety
- •27.5 Fillers
- •27.5.1 Safety
- •27.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •28.1 History
- •28.3 Key Anatomic Features
- •28.4 Preoperative Assessment
- •28.5 Preoperative Care
- •28.6 Surgical Preparation and Technique
- •28.7 Postoperative Care
- •28.8 Potential Complications
- •28.9 Future Considerations
- •References
- •Index
Postoperative Wound Modulation in |
27 |
Aesthetic Eyelid and Periorbital Surgery |
Mehryar Taban, Seongmu Lee, Jonathan A. Hoenig,
Ronald Mancini, Robert A. Goldberg,
and Raymond S. Douglas
Key Points
•Wound modulation in the postoperative setting of aesthetic eyelid and periorbital surgery is helpful in managing scar formation and wound contracture. This is a useful adjunct in determining the surgical outcome of the procedure.
•5-FU is a versatile anti-metabolite that can be utilized for wound modulation after aesthetic eyelid and periorbital surgery. It can be used for scar therapy, eyelid retraction, and encapsulated injected autologous fat.
•Corticosteroids can be used along with 5-FU for optimal wound modulation and scar management.
•Injectable fillers, such as hyaluronic acid gels, are a reversible tool that can be used in the postoperative period to correct contour irregularities and to act as a tissue expander to minimize tissue contracture.
approaches including anti-metabolites, anti-inflammatory agents, and tissue volume expansion can provide substantial improvement.
A meticulous preoperative evaluation, including a complete physical examination, discussion of functional limitations, and a realistic appraisal of patient expectations, is paramount. We cannot stress enough that realistic expectations are especially important in the setting of scar revision. Factors to consider in formulating a treatment plan include the nature, anatomic location, and extent of the scar. In addition, it is critical to assess skin type and ethnicity of the patient, etiology of the scar, history of scarring tendencies, and all prior treatments and their relative efficacy. As scar formation is an evolution, the timing of all surgical and nonsurgical interventions is critical.
27.1Introduction
Scar formation is a highly regulated tissue response following skin or tissue injury and is anticipated after surgical manipulation. However, exuberant scar formation on conspicuous areas of the face can be aesthetically disfiguring and functionally debilitating. The modulation of scar formation in the postoperative setting is a vital component of aesthetic eyelid and facial surgery. While numerous surgical approaches have been described to revise scars, nonsurgical adjunctive treatments which target the underlying biologic process are effective and safe. A variety of nonsurgical
R.S. Douglas (*)
Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA e-mail: raydougl@med.umich.edu
27.2Anti-metabolites
In general, antimetabolites interfere with the proliferative mechanisms of scar formation, most notably by disrupting fibroblast biology. Anti-metabolites are not cell-type specific but rather target proliferating or synthetically active cells instead of quiescent cells. Interference with fibroblast proliferation and the production of collagen and other synthetic products has proven successful in scar prevention and reduction.
27.35-Fluorouracil
The anti-metabolite, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (Fig. 27.1), has been used widely for decades in oncology and more recently in dermatologic management of skin lesions. The drug has a long track record of efficacy, safety, and mechanistic understanding. More recently, this anti-metabolite has gained popularity in the management of exuberant scar formation as it is efficacious and has an excellent safety profile.
G.G. Massry et al. (eds.), Master Techniques in Blepharoplasty and Periorbital Rejuvenation, |
307 |
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0067-7_27, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 |
|
308 |
M. Taban et al. |
|
|
Fig. 27.1 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) supplied in 50 mg/mL concentration
27.3.1 Mechanism of Action
5-FU minimizes scar formation by inhibiting cell proliferation through the disruption of DNA synthesis and inhibiting collagen production. As 5-FU is a fluorinated pyrimidine, it acts to inhibit DNA synthesis and cell proliferation by inhibition of thymidylate synthetase and direct misincorporation. Structurally, it is identical to uracil but with fluorine substituted for hydrogen at the C-5 position, which allows rapid cellular entry and utilization. 5-FU is converted into fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate, which, through its interaction with thymidylate synthetase, inhibits the conversion of uracil into thymidylate. This results in a deficiency of thymidylate, a precursor of thymidine phosphate, one of the four deoxyribonucleotides needed for DNA synthesis and repair. Additionally, direct misincorporation into DNA leads to single strand breaks and aberrant incorporation into RNA, thereby interfering with normal RNA function [1–4]. 5-FU directly and specifically inhibits proliferating and synthetically active cells that cause fibrosis. The relative specificity directed to actively synthetic or proliferating cells minimizes clinical tissue toxicity.
The efficacy of 5-FU in the management of scars may also be related to its capacity to interfere with transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) signaling and resultant type I collagen gene expression in dermal fibroblasts. Abnormally excessive accumulation of type I collagen has been found in keloids and hypertrophic scars, which is believed to play a pathological role in these exuberant scar responses [5, 6].
TGF-b is thought to be the main factor leading to tissue fibrosis secondary to its induction of collagen gene expression. 5-FU has been found to reduce intermediary cell signaling and prevent TGF-b induced gene transactivation and type I collagen production in human fibroblasts, thus providing a mechanism for the efficacy of 5-FU in the treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars [7–10].
In glaucoma surgery, 5-FU is routinely used for its ability to inhibit and prevent scarring after trabeculectomy surgery [11]. Uppal et al. reported their results utilizing an external application of 5-FU soaked pledgets following extralesional excision of keloids. Biopsies 1 month following treatment showed a reduction in Ki-67 (a marker of cell proliferation), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (a marker of inflammation), and TGF-b compared to controls [12].
27.3.2 Management
Intralesional 5-FU has been described as an effective treatment modality in the management of dermal scars, particularly for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids [10, 13–15]. However, as this is an off-label use for 5-FU , the indications, risks, benefits, and alternatives are explained in detail to the patient prior to treatment. For each treatment, an intradermal injection of approximately 0.2–0.3 mL (50 mg/mL, American Pharmaceutical Partners, Schaumburg, IL) is given at weekly or biweekly intervals for a course of one to three treatments based on response. Transient pain at the injection site is the main drawback. The pain of injection can be substantially reduced by mixing 5-FU and lidocaine 2% in the same syringe (2:1–5-FU:lidocaine) and using topical anesthetics. Placement of 5-FU is targeted to the areas of maximal scar density, usually the dermis and subcutaneous tissues. Placement of 0.2–0.5 cc in the skin and areas of maximal scar density using multiple passes is ideal. Given the short half-life of 5-FU, patients are discouraged from massaging the area for 8 h to allow maximal benefit. Softening and improvement in appearance can often be noted after as few as one or two treatment sessions, with continued improvement over the weeks to follow. The literature is mixed in terms of frequency of recurrence, but in the eyelid and face we have noted longstanding results with minimal regression (Fig. 27.2).
Postsurgical eyelid scarring and contracture can result after any eyelid surgery, particularly following lower eyelid reconstruction or blepharoplasty [16, 17]. It can manifest as lower eyelid retraction, ectropion, or entropion depending on the state of the anterior and posterior lamella and is usually apparent as the postoperative edema is regressing (1–2 weeks postsurgery). Resultant signs and symptoms include ocular irritation, photophobia, excessive tearing, and nocturnal
27 Postoperative Wound Modulation in Aesthetic Eyelid and Periorbital Surgery |
309 |
|
|
Fig. 27.2 Cicatricial left lower eyelid retraction improved after two 5-FU injections
Fig. 27.3 Photograph illustrating cicatricial left lower eyelid retraction, as demonstrated by positive forced upward traction test
lagophthalmos. While aggressive lubrication of the ocular surface with artificial tears and ointments may alleviate some of these symptoms, surgical intervention is usually necessary for management.
Cicatricial wound healing of the lower eyelid can result in significant lower eyelid scarring with subsequent progressive retraction (Fig. 27.3). This can be especially problematic when combined with temporary or permanent localized facial nerve paresis (orbicularis weakness). The injection of anti-metabolites such as 5-FU at the earliest signs of contracture (typically 1–2 weeks after surgery) may minimize this process. Administration of 0.2–0.3 mL of 5-FU mixed with
Fig. 27.4 A middle-aged woman with left eyelid Frost suture immediately after lower eyelid surgery
lidocaine in the middle eyelid lamellae surrounding maximal areas of contraction can be carried out via the transcutaneous or transconjunctival route depending upon the areas of contracture at weekly or biweekly intervals. The goal is to maximize 5-FU concentration in the scarred area so that modulation of the healing process can occur in a beneficial way, leading to less cicatrization with maintenance of normal anatomy. Patients can be carefully followed up during the postoperative period, and adjunctive treatments such as placing the eyelid on stretch (i.e., Frost suture) can be utilized (Fig. 27.4). In situations of persistent or significant scarring, we routinely treat the eyelid retraction with scar lysis and middle lamellar stenting with a tissue matrix graft (Alloderm, Lifecell, KCI, Branchburg, NJ) (Fig. 27.5) utilizing a small conjunctival incisional approach. We have found that when a tissue matrix graft is reconstituted in 5-FU, there is dramatic improvement of the cicatrix. The graft likely elutes antimetabolite over an extended time period, reducing the fibrotic process.
Autologous facial fat injections are commonly utilized for soft tissue augmentation to address contour irregularities and volume deflation associated with aging. Encapsulation of autologous injected fat with inflammatory tissue, however, is a relatively common and disfiguring complication, particularly under the thin skin of the periocular region. Attempts at surgical excision or disruption have limited success, unpredictable outcome, and can lead to irregular scars [18]. The authors routinely treat encapsulated fat with intralesional injection of 5-FU. Typically, 0.2–0.3 mL of 5-FU is injected into the fat granuloma, with repeat treatment at 2–3 week intervals. We have found improvement of these lesions with softening, and in a subset of patients, complete resolution of encapsulation of autologous injected fat.
