Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Master Techniques in Blepharoplasty and Periorbital Rejuvenation_Massry, Murphy, Azizzadeh_2011.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
33.26 Mб
Скачать

42

J.P. Tao et al.

 

 

Fig. 4.22 (a) Malar mounds. White pentagons demarcate the palpebro-malar groove, red line the nasojugal groove, and blue dots the tear trough deformity. (b) Festoons

Fig. 4.23 (a) Patient with signs of aging process in the lower eyelids. Examination reveals notching and a suspicious pearly lesion affecting left lower eyelid margin. (b, c) After left lower eyelid basal cell carcinoma excision (with frozen section control) and reconstruction

(tarso-conjunctival posterior lamella flap with skin and orbicularis cheek advancement flap). This unilateral reconstructive case demonstrates effect of midface lifting procedures in restoring the single unit appearance of the eyelid and cheek

inferolaterally. The medial half of the nasojugal fold is also referred to as a tear trough deformity. The presence of soft tissue folds (malar mounds) and skin folds (festoons) may be found in the triangular zone formed at the junction of the lateral inferior orbital rim and cheek (Figs. 4.22 and 4.23) [29, 30]. Midface descent also contributes to deepening of the perioral “laugh lines,” also known as “marionette lines,” which may be corrected with cheek lifting or facial filling strategies.

4.5Conclusion

The critical aesthetic assessment of the periorbital face includes knowledge of periocular and ophthalmic anatomy, as well as an understanding of morphologic changes that occur with age and variations among sex and race. Consideration of the orbitoskeleton and globe, the forehead and upper eyelid complex, and the lower eyelid and midface

4 Critical Evaluation of the Periorbital Aesthetic Patient

43

 

 

complex may assist in delivering aesthetically pleasing and functionally sound interventions. Importantly, the assessment of these units is not limited to inspection but may include palpation and digital manipulation. Additionally, dialogue and patient involvement is essential. With a structured assessment, optimal results can be achieved.

References

1.McCurdy Jr JA. Beautiful eyes: characteristics and application to aesthetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(3):204–14.

2.Springer IN, Wannicke B, Warnke PH, Zernial O, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, et al. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(2): 156–62.

3.Rhodes G, Proffitt F, Grady JM, Sumich A. Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychon Bull Ver. 1998;5(4):659–69.

4.Ho T, Brissett AE. Preoperative assessment of the aging patient. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(2):85–90.

5.McCord CD, Codner MA. Aging changes in the eyelid and periorbital area. In: Eyelid and periorbital surgery. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2008. p. 133–50.

6.Hester Jr TR, Douglas T, Szczerba S. Decreasing complications in lower lid and midface rejuvenation: the importance of orbital morphology, horizontal lower lid laxity, history of previous surgery, and minimizing trauma to the orbital septum: a critical review of 269 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(3):1037–49.

7.Hirmand H, Codner MA, McCord CD, Hester Jr TR, Nahai F. Prominent eye: operative management in lower lid and midfacial rejuvenation and the morphologic classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):620–8.

8.Ahmadi H, Shams PN, Davies NP, Joshi N, Kelly MH. Age-related changes in the normal sagittal relationship between globe and orbit. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(3):246–50.

9.Gunter JP, Antrobus SD. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast

Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(7):1808–16.

10. Alex JC. Aesthetic considerations in the elevation of the eyebrow. Facial Plast Surg. 2004;20(3):193–8.

11. McCord CD, Doxanas MT. Browplasty and browpexy: an adjunct to blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(2):248–54.

12. Pitanguy I, Radwanski HN. Rejuvenation of the brow. Dermatol Clin. 1997;15(4):623–34.

13. Morton AD. Assessment and management of the eyebrow. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and practice of ophthalmology. Basic sciences. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 3529–42.

14. Starck WJ, Griffin Jr JE, Epker BN. Objective evaluation of the eyelids and eyebrows after blepharoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54(3):297–302.

15. Ross AT, Neal JG. Rejuvenation of the aging eyelid. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(2):97–104.

16. Goldstein SA, Goldstein SM. Anatomic and aesthetic considerations in midfacial rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(2):105–11.

17. Perkins SW, Batniji RK. Rejuvenation of the lower eyelid complex. Facial Plast Surg. 2005;21(4):279–85.

18. Logau RG. Systematic evaluation of the aging face. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, editors. Dermatology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 2295–9.

19. Goldberg RA, McCann JD, Fiaschetti D, Ben Simon GJ. What causes eyelid bags? Analysis of 114 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(5):1395–402.

20. Byrd HS, Burt JD. Achieving aesthetic balance in the brow, eyelids, and midface. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):926–33.

21. Hester Jr TR, Codner MA, McCord CD, Nahai F, Giannopoulos A. Evolution of technique of the direct transblepharoplasty approach for the correction of lower lid and midfacial aging: maximizing results and minimizing complications in a 5-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):393–406.

22. Goldberg RA. The three periorbital hollows: a paradigm for periorbital rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(6):1796–804.

23. Holck DEE, Foster JA, Kalwerisky K. Lower eyelid blepharoplasty and midface elevation surgery. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and practice of ophthalmology. Basic sciences. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 3471–82.

24. Patipa M. Combined hard palate spacer graft, midface suspension, and lateral canthoplasty for lower eyelid retraction: a tripartite approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(7):2115–7.

25. Hamra ST. The role of the septal reset in creating a youthful eyelidcheek complex in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113(7):2124–41.

26. Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):873–84.

27.Kikkawa DO, Bradley NL, Dortzback K. Relations of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system to the orbit and characterization of the orbitomalar ligament. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;12(2):77–88.

28. Atiyeh BS, Hayek SN. Combined arcus marginalis release, preseptal orbicularis muscle sling, and SOOF plication for midfacial rejuvenation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2004;28(4):197–202.

29. De Cordier BC, de la Torre JI, Al-Hakeem MS, Rosenberg LZ, Costa-Ferreira A, Gardner PM, et al. Rejuvenation of the midface by elevating the malar fat pad: review of technique, cases, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(6):1526–36.

30. Kawamoto HK, Bradley JP. The tear “TROUF” procedure: transconjunctival repositioning of orbital unipedicled fat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(7):1903–7; discussion 1908–9.