- •Lens Design Fundamentals
- •Contents
- •Preface to the Second Edition
- •Preface to the First Edition
- •A Special Tribute to Rudolf Kingslake
- •1.1. Relations Between Designer and Factory
- •1.1.1 Spherical versus Aspheric Surfaces
- •1.1.2 Establishment of Thicknesses
- •1.1.3 Antireflection Coatings
- •1.1.4 Cementing
- •1.1.5 Establishing Tolerances
- •1.1.6 Design Tradeoffs
- •1.2. The Design Procedure
- •1.2.1 Sources of a Likely Starting System
- •1.2.2 Lens Evaluation
- •1.2.3 Lens Appraisal
- •1.2.4 System Changes
- •1.3. Optical Materials
- •1.3.1 Optical Glass
- •1.3.2 Infrared Materials
- •1.3.3 Ultraviolet Materials
- •1.3.4 Optical Plastics
- •1.4. Interpolation of Refractive Indices
- •1.4.1 Interpolation of Dispersion Values
- •1.4.2 Temperature Coefficient of Refractive Index
- •1.5. Lens Types to be Considered
- •2.1. Introduction
- •2.1.1 Object and Image
- •2.1.2 The Law of Refraction
- •2.1.3 The Meridional Plane
- •2.1.4 Types of Rays
- •2.1.5 Notation and Sign Conventions
- •2.2. Graphical Ray Tracing
- •2.3. Trigonometrical Ray Tracing at a Spherical Surface
- •2.3.1 Program for a Computer
- •2.4. Some Useful Relations
- •2.4.1 The Spherometer Formula
- •2.4.2 Some Useful Formulas
- •2.4.3 The Intersection Height of Two Spheres
- •2.4.4 The Volume of a Lens
- •2.5. Cemented Doublet Objective
- •2.6. Ray Tracing at a Tilted Surface
- •2.6.1 The Ray Tracing Equations
- •2.6.2 Example of Ray Tracing through a Tilted Surface
- •2.7. Ray Tracing at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1. Tracing a Paraxial Ray
- •3.1.1 The Standard Paraxial Ray Trace
- •3.1.2 The (y – nu) Method
- •3.1.3 Inverse Procedure
- •3.1.4 Angle Solve and Height Solve Methods
- •3.1.6 Paraxial Ray with All Angles
- •3.1.7 A Paraxial Ray at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1.9 Matrix Approach to Paraxial Rays
- •3.2. Magnification and the Lagrange Theorem
- •3.2.1 Transverse Magnification
- •3.2.2 Longitudinal Magnification
- •3.3. The Gaussian Optics of a Lens System
- •3.3.1 The Relation between the Principal Planes
- •3.3.2 The Relation between the Two Focal Lengths
- •3.3.3 Lens Power
- •3.3.4 Calculation of Focal Length
- •3.3.5 Conjugate Distance Relationships
- •3.3.6 Nodal Points
- •3.3.7 Optical Center of Lens
- •3.3.8 The Scheimpflug Condition
- •3.4. First-Order Layout of an Optical System
- •3.4.1 A Single Thick Lens
- •3.4.2 A Single Thin Lens
- •3.4.3 A Monocentric Lens
- •3.4.4 Image Shift Caused by a Parallel Plate
- •3.4.5 Lens Bending
- •3.4.6 A Series of Separated Thin Elements
- •3.4.7 Insertion of Thicknesses
- •3.4.8 Two-Lens Systems
- •3.5. Thin-Lens Layout of Zoom Systems
- •3.5.1 Mechanically Compensated Zoom Lenses
- •3.5.2 A Three-Lens Zoom
- •3.5.4 A Four-Lens Optically Compensated Zoom System
- •3.5.5 An Optically Compensated Zoom Enlarger or Printer
- •Endnotes
- •4.1. Introduction
- •4.2. Symmetrical Optical Systems
- •4.3. Aberration Determination Using Ray Trace Data
- •4.3.1 Defocus
- •4.3.2 Spherical Aberration
- •4.3.3 Tangential and Sagittal Astigmatism
- •4.3.4 Tangential and Sagittal Coma
- •4.3.5 Distortion
- •4.3.6 Selection of Rays for Aberration Computation
- •4.3.7 Zonal Aberrations
- •4.3.8 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Astigmatism
- •4.3.9 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Coma
- •4.3.10 Higher-Order Contributions
- •4.4. Calculation of Seidel Aberration Coefficients
- •Endnotes
- •5.1. Introduction
- •5.2. Spherochromatism of a Cemented Doublet
- •5.2.4 Secondary Spectrum
- •5.2.5 Spherochromatism
- •5.3. Contribution of a Single Surface to the Primary Chromatic Aberration
- •5.4. Contribution of a Thin Element in a System to the Paraxial Chromatic Aberration
- •5.5. Paraxial Secondary Spectrum
- •5.7.1 Secondary Spectrum of a Dialyte
- •5.7.2 A One-Glass Achromat
- •5.8. Chromatic Aberration Tolerances
- •5.8.1 A Single Lens
- •5.8.2 An Achromat
- •5.9. Chromatic Aberration at Finite Aperture
- •5.9.1 Conrady’s D – d Method of Achromatization
- •5.9.3 Tolerance for the D – d Sum
- •5.9.5 Paraxial D – d for a Thin Element
- •Endnotes
- •6.1. Surface Contribution Formulas
- •6.1.1 The Three Cases of Zero Aberration at a Surface
- •6.1.2 An Aplanatic Single Element
- •6.1.3 Effect of Object Distance on the Spherical Aberration Arising at a Surface
- •6.1.4 Effect of Lens Bending
- •6.1.6 A Two-Lens Minimum Aberration System
- •6.1.7 A Four-Lens Monochromat Objective
- •6.2. Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •6.3. Primary Spherical Aberration
- •6.3.1 At a Single Surface
- •6.3.2 Primary Spherical Aberration of a Thin Lens
- •6.4. The Image Displacement Caused by a Planoparallel Plate
- •6.5. Spherical Aberration Tolerances
- •6.5.1 Primary Aberration
- •6.5.2 Zonal Aberration
- •Endnotes
- •7.1. The Four-Ray Method
- •7.2. A Thin-Lens Predesign
- •7.2.1 Insertion of Thickness
- •7.2.2 Flint-in-Front Solutions
- •7.3. Correction of Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •7.4. Design Of an Apochromatic Objective
- •7.4.1 A Cemented Doublet
- •7.4.2 A Triplet Apochromat
- •7.4.3 Apochromatic Objective with an Air Lens
- •Endnotes
- •8.1. Passage of an Oblique Beam through a Spherical Surface
- •8.1.1 Coma and Astigmatism
- •8.1.2 Principal Ray, Stops, and Pupils
- •8.1.3 Vignetting
- •8.2. Tracing Oblique Meridional Rays
- •8.2.1 The Meridional Ray Plot
- •8.3. Tracing a Skew Ray
- •8.3.1 Transfer Formulas
- •8.3.2 The Angles of Incidence
- •8.3.3 Refraction Equations
- •8.3.4 Transfer to the Next Surface
- •8.3.5 Opening Equations
- •8.3.6 Closing Equations
- •8.3.7 Diapoint Location
- •8.3.8 Example of a Skew-Ray Trace
- •8.4. Graphical Representation of Skew-Ray Aberrations
- •8.4.1 The Sagittal Ray Plot
- •8.4.2 A Spot Diagram
- •8.4.3 Encircled Energy Plot
- •8.4.4 Modulation Transfer Function
- •8.5. Ray Distribution from a Single Zone of a Lens
- •Endnotes
- •9.1. The Optical Sine Theorem
- •9.2. The Abbe Sine Condition
- •9.2.1 Coma for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •9.3. Offense Against the Sine Condition
- •9.3.1 Solution for Stop Position for a Given OSC
- •9.3.2 Surface Contribution to the OSC
- •9.3.3 Orders of Coma
- •9.3.4 The Coma G Sum
- •9.3.5 Spherical Aberration and OSC
- •9.4. Illustration of Comatic Error
- •Endnotes
- •10.1. Broken-Contact Type
- •10.2. Parallel Air-Space Type
- •10.3. An Aplanatic Cemented Doublet
- •10.4. A Triple Cemented Aplanat
- •10.5. An Aplanat with A Buried Achromatizing Surface
- •10.6. The Matching Principle
- •Endnotes
- •11.1. Astigmatism and the Coddington Equations
- •11.1.1 The Tangential Image
- •11.1.2 The Sagittal Image
- •11.1.3 Astigmatic Calculation
- •11.1.5 Astigmatism for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •11.1.6 Astigmatism at a Tilted Surface
- •11.2. The Petzval Theorem
- •11.2.1 Relation Between the Petzval Sum and Astigmatism
- •11.2.2 Methods for Reducing the Petzval Sum
- •11.3. Illustration of Astigmatic Error
- •11.4. Distortion
- •11.4.1 Measuring Distortion
- •11.4.2 Distortion Contribution Formulas
- •11.4.3 Distortion When the Image Surface Is Curved
- •11.5. Lateral Color
- •11.5.1 Primary Lateral Color
- •11.6. The Symmetrical Principle
- •11.7. Computation of the Seidel Aberrations
- •11.7.1 Surface Contributions
- •11.7.2 Thin-Lens Contributions
- •11.7.3 Aspheric Surface Corrections
- •11.7.4 A Thin Lens in the Plane of an Image
- •Endnotes
- •12.1.1 Distortion
- •12.1.2 Tangential Field Curvature
- •12.1.3 Coma
- •12.1.4 Spherical Aberration
- •12.2. Simple Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.1 Simple Rear Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.2 A Simple Front Landscape Lens
- •12.3. A Periscopic Lens
- •12.4. Achromatic Landscape Lenses
- •12.4.1 The Chevalier Type
- •12.4.2 The Grubb Type
- •12.5. Achromatic Double Lenses
- •12.5.1 The Rapid Rectilinear
- •12.5.3 Long Telescopic Relay Lenses
- •12.5.4 The Ross “Concentric” Lens
- •Endnotes
- •13.1. The Design of a Dagor Lens
- •13.2. The Design of an Air-Spaced Dialyte Lens
- •13.4. Double-Gauss Lens with Cemented Triplets
- •13.5. Double-Gauss Lens with Air-spaced Negative Doublets
- •Endnotes
- •14.1. The Petzval Portrait Lens
- •14.1.1 The Petzval Design
- •14.1.2 The Dallmeyer Design
- •14.2. The Design of a Telephoto Lens
- •14.3. Lenses to Change Magnification
- •14.3.1 Barlow Lens
- •14.3.2 Bravais Lens
- •14.4. The Protar Lens
- •14.5. Design of a Tessar Lens
- •14.5.1 Choice of Glass
- •14.5.2 Available Degrees of Freedom
- •14.5.3 Chromatic Correction
- •14.5.4 Spherical Correction
- •14.5.5 Correction of Coma and Field
- •14.5.6 Final Steps
- •14.6. The Cooke Triplet Lens
- •14.6.2 The Thin-Lens Predesign of the Bendings
- •14.6.3 Calculation of Real Aberrations
- •14.6.4 Triplet Lens Improvements
- •Endnotes
- •15.1. Comparison of Mirrors and Lenses
- •15.2. Ray Tracing a Mirror System
- •15.3. Single-Mirror Systems
- •15.3.1 A Spherical Mirror
- •15.3.2 A Parabolic Mirror
- •15.3.3 An Elliptical Mirror
- •15.3.4 A Hyperbolic Mirror
- •15.4. Single-Mirror Catadioptric Systems
- •15.4.1 A Flat-Field Ross Corrector
- •15.4.2 An Aplanatic Parabola Corrector
- •15.4.3 The Mangin Mirror
- •15.4.4 The Bouwers–Maksutov System
- •15.4.5 The Gabor Lens
- •15.4.6 The Schmidt Camera
- •15.4.7 Variable Focal-Range Infrared Telescope
- •15.4.8 Broad-Spectrum Afocal Catadioptric Telescope
- •15.4.9 Self-Corrected Unit-Magnification Systems
- •15.5. Two-Mirror Systems
- •15.5.1 Two-Mirror Systems with Aspheric Surfaces
- •15.5.2 A Maksutov Cassegrain System
- •15.5.3 A Schwarzschild Microscope Objective
- •15.5.4 Three-Mirror System
- •15.6. Multiple-Mirror Zoom Systems
- •15.6.2 All-Reflective Zoom Optical Systems
- •15.7. Summary
- •Endnotes
- •16.1. Design of a Military-Type Eyepiece
- •16.1.1 The Objective Lens
- •16.1.2 Eyepiece Layout
- •16.2. Design of an Erfle Eyepiece
- •16.3. Design of a Galilean Viewfinder
- •Endnotes
- •17.1. Finding a Lens Design Solution
- •17.1.1 The Case of as Many Aberrations as There Are Degrees of Freedom
- •17.1.2 The Case of More Aberrations Than Free Variables
- •17.1.3 What Is an Aberration?
- •17.1.4 Solution of the Equations
- •17.2. Optimization Principles
- •17.3. Weights and Balancing Aberrations
- •17.4. Control of Boundary Conditions
- •17.5. Tolerances
- •17.6. Program Limitations
- •17.7. Lens Design Computing Development
- •17.8. Programs and Books Useful for Automatic Lens Design
- •17.8.1 Automatic Lens Design Programs
- •17.8.2 Lens Design Books
- •Endnotes
- •Index
12.2 Simple Landscape Lenses |
325 |
indicates an inward-curving field because the upper rim ray strikes the image plane lower than the lower rim ray. Conversely, if the slope is downward from left to right, it indicates a backward-curving field because the upper rim ray strikes the image plane higher than the lower rim ray. A graph that is horizontal at the principal-ray point indicates a flat tangential field.
12.1.3 Coma
The second derivative or curvature of the graph at the principal-ray point is a measure of the tangential coma present in the lens. If the ends of the portion of the graph used are above the principal ray, this indicates positive coma. The coma is clearly zero at a point of inflection where the graph is momentarily a straight line. It is possible that a stop position can be found where both the slope and the curvature are zero; however, this requires that spherical aberration be present.
12.1.4 Spherical Aberration
The presence of spherical aberration is indicated by a cubic or S-shaped curve, undercorrection giving a graph in which the line joining the ends of the curve is more uphill than the tangent line at the principal-ray point. If the line joining the ends of the curve is more downhill, then the spherical aberration is overcorrected.
All of these phenomena are illustrated in the typical H0 L graph shown in Figure 12.1. If the principal ray falls at A, the field will be drastically inwardcurving. At B the field is flat but there is strong negative coma. At C the coma is zero but the field is now backward-curving. At D the field is once more flat but now the coma is positive, while at E the field is once more drastically inward-curving. The overall S shape of the curve indicates the presence of considerable undercorrected spherical aberration.
Thus we reach the important conclusion that we can eliminate coma by a suitable choice of stop position if there is spherical aberration present; indeed, this result is implicit in the OSC formulas in Section 9.3. Furthermore, we can flatten the tangential field by a suitable choice of stop position if there is a sufficiently large amount of coma or spherical aberration or both. In terms of the primary or Seidel aberrations, these conclusions are in agreement with the stopshift formulas given in Eq. (11-15) in Section 11.7.2.
12.2 SIMPLE LANDSCAPE LENSES
It is instructive to plot the 20 H0 L curves for a single lens bent into a variety of shapes, as in Figure 12.2. The focal length is everywhere 10.0, the thickness 0.15, and the refractive index 1.523. In these graphs the abscissa values
326 |
Lenses in Which Stop Position Is a Degree of Freedom |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
c1=–0.4218 |
|
|
|
|
P1 plane |
c2=–0.6 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
c1=–0.1105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c2=–0.3 |
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
c1=0.1912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
c2=0 |
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
c1=0.4837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
c2=0.3 |
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
|
|
|
|
c1=0.7675 |
|
|
|
|
|
c2=0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
–3 |
–2 |
–1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Figure 12.2 Bending a meniscus lens (20 ). The abscissa value is measured from the anterior principal point in each case.
are measured from the front or anterior principal point in each case. The reference point for the parameter L can be the vertex of the first lens surface, the anterior principal point, or any other point the designer may select. In curve
(a) the lens is shown bent into a strongly meniscus shape, concave to the front where parallel light enters. There is a large amount of spherical undercorrection, leading to an S-shaped cubic curve, and the interesting region containing the maximum, inflection, and minimum points lies close to the lens. Placing the stop at the location denoted by a “tick mark” on the H0 L plot results in a flat tangential field (slope is zero) and no coma (zero curvature or inflection point). The distortion is negative since the Gaussian image height is 3.64.
12.2 Simple Landscape Lenses |
327 |
In curve (b) of Figure 12.2, the lens is bent into such a weak meniscus shape that there is very little spherical aberration, with no maxima or minima. With the stop at the tick mark, the astigmatism is inward curving and the coma is positive. In curve (c) of the figure, a plano-convex lens with its curved face to the front is shown. There is now no coma and very little spherical aberration so that the curve is practically a straight line. The tangential astigmatic field is strongly inward curving. In the remaining graphs the lens is a meniscus with a convex side to the front, and now the interesting region has moved behind the lens, still on the concave side of the lens. Curve (d) in Figure 12.2 shows spherical aberration with no coma (inflection point) and some inward curving tangential astigmatic field. The final curve is for a stronger bending and shows stronger spherical aberration and a slight inward curving field. It will be noticed that all the graphs have about the same slope at L ¼ 0. This bears out the well-known fact that any reasonably thin lens with a stop in contact has a fixed amount of inward-curving field independent of the structure of the lens.
As a simple meniscus lens has only two degrees of freedom, namely, the lens bending and the stop position, it is clear that only two aberrations can be corrected. Invariably the two aberrations chosen are coma and tangential field curvature. The axial aberrations, spherical and chromatic, can be reduced as far as necessary by stopping the lens down to a small aperture; f/15 is common although some cameras with short focal lengths have been opened up as far as f/11. The remaining aberrations, lateral color, distortion, and Petzval sum, must be tolerated since there is no way to correct them in such a simple lens. Changes in thickness and refractive index have very little effect on the aberrations.
DESIGNER NOTE
In designing a landscape lens, one should choose a bending such that the H0 L curve is a horizontal line at the inflection point. This will ensure that the coma is corrected and the tangential field will be flat at whatever field angle was chosen for plotting the H0 L curve. Of course, the field may turn in or out at other obliquities.
12.2.1 Simple Rear Landscape Lenses
To meet the specified conditions, it is found that by interpolating between the examples shown in Figure 12.2 for a simple rear landscape lens, a front surface curvature of about –0.28 is required. With the thickness and refractive index used here, there is very little latitude. Solving the rear curvature to give a focal length of 10.0, we arrive at the 25 H 0 L curve shown in Figure 12.3. This curve indicates that the stop must be at B, a distance of 1.40 in front of the lens. At f/15 the stop diameter will be 0.667, and to cover a field of up to 30 the lens diameter
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lenses in Which Stop Position Is a Degree of Freedom |
||||||||||||||
H′ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
4.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
4.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
4.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–2.5 |
–2 |
–1.5 |
–1 |
–0.5 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Figure 12.3 The H 0 L graph of a rear meniscus lens having a flat coma-free field (25 ).
must be about 1.80. Actually, because of excessive astigmatism, it is unlikely that this lens would be usable beyond about 25 from the axis. The lens system is
c |
d |
n |
|
|
|
0.28
0.15 1.523
0.4645
with f 0 ¼ 10.0003, l0 ¼ 10.1445, LA0 ( f/15) ¼ –0.2725, and Petzval sum ¼ 0.0634. The astigmatism is shown in Figure 12.4 and has the values presented in Table 12.1.
If a flatter form were used, the spherical aberration would be slightly reduced and the tangential field would be inward curving. This would reduce the astigmatism, but the sagittal field is already seriously inward curving and flattening the lens would make it even worse. It therefore appears that the present design is about as good as could be expected with such a simple lens.
30°
20°
10°
0
–0.5 0
Figure 12.4 Astigmatism of a simple rear meniscus lens. The sagittal field is the solid curve and the tangential field is the dashed curve.
