- •Lens Design Fundamentals
- •Contents
- •Preface to the Second Edition
- •Preface to the First Edition
- •A Special Tribute to Rudolf Kingslake
- •1.1. Relations Between Designer and Factory
- •1.1.1 Spherical versus Aspheric Surfaces
- •1.1.2 Establishment of Thicknesses
- •1.1.3 Antireflection Coatings
- •1.1.4 Cementing
- •1.1.5 Establishing Tolerances
- •1.1.6 Design Tradeoffs
- •1.2. The Design Procedure
- •1.2.1 Sources of a Likely Starting System
- •1.2.2 Lens Evaluation
- •1.2.3 Lens Appraisal
- •1.2.4 System Changes
- •1.3. Optical Materials
- •1.3.1 Optical Glass
- •1.3.2 Infrared Materials
- •1.3.3 Ultraviolet Materials
- •1.3.4 Optical Plastics
- •1.4. Interpolation of Refractive Indices
- •1.4.1 Interpolation of Dispersion Values
- •1.4.2 Temperature Coefficient of Refractive Index
- •1.5. Lens Types to be Considered
- •2.1. Introduction
- •2.1.1 Object and Image
- •2.1.2 The Law of Refraction
- •2.1.3 The Meridional Plane
- •2.1.4 Types of Rays
- •2.1.5 Notation and Sign Conventions
- •2.2. Graphical Ray Tracing
- •2.3. Trigonometrical Ray Tracing at a Spherical Surface
- •2.3.1 Program for a Computer
- •2.4. Some Useful Relations
- •2.4.1 The Spherometer Formula
- •2.4.2 Some Useful Formulas
- •2.4.3 The Intersection Height of Two Spheres
- •2.4.4 The Volume of a Lens
- •2.5. Cemented Doublet Objective
- •2.6. Ray Tracing at a Tilted Surface
- •2.6.1 The Ray Tracing Equations
- •2.6.2 Example of Ray Tracing through a Tilted Surface
- •2.7. Ray Tracing at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1. Tracing a Paraxial Ray
- •3.1.1 The Standard Paraxial Ray Trace
- •3.1.2 The (y – nu) Method
- •3.1.3 Inverse Procedure
- •3.1.4 Angle Solve and Height Solve Methods
- •3.1.6 Paraxial Ray with All Angles
- •3.1.7 A Paraxial Ray at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1.9 Matrix Approach to Paraxial Rays
- •3.2. Magnification and the Lagrange Theorem
- •3.2.1 Transverse Magnification
- •3.2.2 Longitudinal Magnification
- •3.3. The Gaussian Optics of a Lens System
- •3.3.1 The Relation between the Principal Planes
- •3.3.2 The Relation between the Two Focal Lengths
- •3.3.3 Lens Power
- •3.3.4 Calculation of Focal Length
- •3.3.5 Conjugate Distance Relationships
- •3.3.6 Nodal Points
- •3.3.7 Optical Center of Lens
- •3.3.8 The Scheimpflug Condition
- •3.4. First-Order Layout of an Optical System
- •3.4.1 A Single Thick Lens
- •3.4.2 A Single Thin Lens
- •3.4.3 A Monocentric Lens
- •3.4.4 Image Shift Caused by a Parallel Plate
- •3.4.5 Lens Bending
- •3.4.6 A Series of Separated Thin Elements
- •3.4.7 Insertion of Thicknesses
- •3.4.8 Two-Lens Systems
- •3.5. Thin-Lens Layout of Zoom Systems
- •3.5.1 Mechanically Compensated Zoom Lenses
- •3.5.2 A Three-Lens Zoom
- •3.5.4 A Four-Lens Optically Compensated Zoom System
- •3.5.5 An Optically Compensated Zoom Enlarger or Printer
- •Endnotes
- •4.1. Introduction
- •4.2. Symmetrical Optical Systems
- •4.3. Aberration Determination Using Ray Trace Data
- •4.3.1 Defocus
- •4.3.2 Spherical Aberration
- •4.3.3 Tangential and Sagittal Astigmatism
- •4.3.4 Tangential and Sagittal Coma
- •4.3.5 Distortion
- •4.3.6 Selection of Rays for Aberration Computation
- •4.3.7 Zonal Aberrations
- •4.3.8 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Astigmatism
- •4.3.9 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Coma
- •4.3.10 Higher-Order Contributions
- •4.4. Calculation of Seidel Aberration Coefficients
- •Endnotes
- •5.1. Introduction
- •5.2. Spherochromatism of a Cemented Doublet
- •5.2.4 Secondary Spectrum
- •5.2.5 Spherochromatism
- •5.3. Contribution of a Single Surface to the Primary Chromatic Aberration
- •5.4. Contribution of a Thin Element in a System to the Paraxial Chromatic Aberration
- •5.5. Paraxial Secondary Spectrum
- •5.7.1 Secondary Spectrum of a Dialyte
- •5.7.2 A One-Glass Achromat
- •5.8. Chromatic Aberration Tolerances
- •5.8.1 A Single Lens
- •5.8.2 An Achromat
- •5.9. Chromatic Aberration at Finite Aperture
- •5.9.1 Conrady’s D – d Method of Achromatization
- •5.9.3 Tolerance for the D – d Sum
- •5.9.5 Paraxial D – d for a Thin Element
- •Endnotes
- •6.1. Surface Contribution Formulas
- •6.1.1 The Three Cases of Zero Aberration at a Surface
- •6.1.2 An Aplanatic Single Element
- •6.1.3 Effect of Object Distance on the Spherical Aberration Arising at a Surface
- •6.1.4 Effect of Lens Bending
- •6.1.6 A Two-Lens Minimum Aberration System
- •6.1.7 A Four-Lens Monochromat Objective
- •6.2. Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •6.3. Primary Spherical Aberration
- •6.3.1 At a Single Surface
- •6.3.2 Primary Spherical Aberration of a Thin Lens
- •6.4. The Image Displacement Caused by a Planoparallel Plate
- •6.5. Spherical Aberration Tolerances
- •6.5.1 Primary Aberration
- •6.5.2 Zonal Aberration
- •Endnotes
- •7.1. The Four-Ray Method
- •7.2. A Thin-Lens Predesign
- •7.2.1 Insertion of Thickness
- •7.2.2 Flint-in-Front Solutions
- •7.3. Correction of Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •7.4. Design Of an Apochromatic Objective
- •7.4.1 A Cemented Doublet
- •7.4.2 A Triplet Apochromat
- •7.4.3 Apochromatic Objective with an Air Lens
- •Endnotes
- •8.1. Passage of an Oblique Beam through a Spherical Surface
- •8.1.1 Coma and Astigmatism
- •8.1.2 Principal Ray, Stops, and Pupils
- •8.1.3 Vignetting
- •8.2. Tracing Oblique Meridional Rays
- •8.2.1 The Meridional Ray Plot
- •8.3. Tracing a Skew Ray
- •8.3.1 Transfer Formulas
- •8.3.2 The Angles of Incidence
- •8.3.3 Refraction Equations
- •8.3.4 Transfer to the Next Surface
- •8.3.5 Opening Equations
- •8.3.6 Closing Equations
- •8.3.7 Diapoint Location
- •8.3.8 Example of a Skew-Ray Trace
- •8.4. Graphical Representation of Skew-Ray Aberrations
- •8.4.1 The Sagittal Ray Plot
- •8.4.2 A Spot Diagram
- •8.4.3 Encircled Energy Plot
- •8.4.4 Modulation Transfer Function
- •8.5. Ray Distribution from a Single Zone of a Lens
- •Endnotes
- •9.1. The Optical Sine Theorem
- •9.2. The Abbe Sine Condition
- •9.2.1 Coma for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •9.3. Offense Against the Sine Condition
- •9.3.1 Solution for Stop Position for a Given OSC
- •9.3.2 Surface Contribution to the OSC
- •9.3.3 Orders of Coma
- •9.3.4 The Coma G Sum
- •9.3.5 Spherical Aberration and OSC
- •9.4. Illustration of Comatic Error
- •Endnotes
- •10.1. Broken-Contact Type
- •10.2. Parallel Air-Space Type
- •10.3. An Aplanatic Cemented Doublet
- •10.4. A Triple Cemented Aplanat
- •10.5. An Aplanat with A Buried Achromatizing Surface
- •10.6. The Matching Principle
- •Endnotes
- •11.1. Astigmatism and the Coddington Equations
- •11.1.1 The Tangential Image
- •11.1.2 The Sagittal Image
- •11.1.3 Astigmatic Calculation
- •11.1.5 Astigmatism for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •11.1.6 Astigmatism at a Tilted Surface
- •11.2. The Petzval Theorem
- •11.2.1 Relation Between the Petzval Sum and Astigmatism
- •11.2.2 Methods for Reducing the Petzval Sum
- •11.3. Illustration of Astigmatic Error
- •11.4. Distortion
- •11.4.1 Measuring Distortion
- •11.4.2 Distortion Contribution Formulas
- •11.4.3 Distortion When the Image Surface Is Curved
- •11.5. Lateral Color
- •11.5.1 Primary Lateral Color
- •11.6. The Symmetrical Principle
- •11.7. Computation of the Seidel Aberrations
- •11.7.1 Surface Contributions
- •11.7.2 Thin-Lens Contributions
- •11.7.3 Aspheric Surface Corrections
- •11.7.4 A Thin Lens in the Plane of an Image
- •Endnotes
- •12.1.1 Distortion
- •12.1.2 Tangential Field Curvature
- •12.1.3 Coma
- •12.1.4 Spherical Aberration
- •12.2. Simple Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.1 Simple Rear Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.2 A Simple Front Landscape Lens
- •12.3. A Periscopic Lens
- •12.4. Achromatic Landscape Lenses
- •12.4.1 The Chevalier Type
- •12.4.2 The Grubb Type
- •12.5. Achromatic Double Lenses
- •12.5.1 The Rapid Rectilinear
- •12.5.3 Long Telescopic Relay Lenses
- •12.5.4 The Ross “Concentric” Lens
- •Endnotes
- •13.1. The Design of a Dagor Lens
- •13.2. The Design of an Air-Spaced Dialyte Lens
- •13.4. Double-Gauss Lens with Cemented Triplets
- •13.5. Double-Gauss Lens with Air-spaced Negative Doublets
- •Endnotes
- •14.1. The Petzval Portrait Lens
- •14.1.1 The Petzval Design
- •14.1.2 The Dallmeyer Design
- •14.2. The Design of a Telephoto Lens
- •14.3. Lenses to Change Magnification
- •14.3.1 Barlow Lens
- •14.3.2 Bravais Lens
- •14.4. The Protar Lens
- •14.5. Design of a Tessar Lens
- •14.5.1 Choice of Glass
- •14.5.2 Available Degrees of Freedom
- •14.5.3 Chromatic Correction
- •14.5.4 Spherical Correction
- •14.5.5 Correction of Coma and Field
- •14.5.6 Final Steps
- •14.6. The Cooke Triplet Lens
- •14.6.2 The Thin-Lens Predesign of the Bendings
- •14.6.3 Calculation of Real Aberrations
- •14.6.4 Triplet Lens Improvements
- •Endnotes
- •15.1. Comparison of Mirrors and Lenses
- •15.2. Ray Tracing a Mirror System
- •15.3. Single-Mirror Systems
- •15.3.1 A Spherical Mirror
- •15.3.2 A Parabolic Mirror
- •15.3.3 An Elliptical Mirror
- •15.3.4 A Hyperbolic Mirror
- •15.4. Single-Mirror Catadioptric Systems
- •15.4.1 A Flat-Field Ross Corrector
- •15.4.2 An Aplanatic Parabola Corrector
- •15.4.3 The Mangin Mirror
- •15.4.4 The Bouwers–Maksutov System
- •15.4.5 The Gabor Lens
- •15.4.6 The Schmidt Camera
- •15.4.7 Variable Focal-Range Infrared Telescope
- •15.4.8 Broad-Spectrum Afocal Catadioptric Telescope
- •15.4.9 Self-Corrected Unit-Magnification Systems
- •15.5. Two-Mirror Systems
- •15.5.1 Two-Mirror Systems with Aspheric Surfaces
- •15.5.2 A Maksutov Cassegrain System
- •15.5.3 A Schwarzschild Microscope Objective
- •15.5.4 Three-Mirror System
- •15.6. Multiple-Mirror Zoom Systems
- •15.6.2 All-Reflective Zoom Optical Systems
- •15.7. Summary
- •Endnotes
- •16.1. Design of a Military-Type Eyepiece
- •16.1.1 The Objective Lens
- •16.1.2 Eyepiece Layout
- •16.2. Design of an Erfle Eyepiece
- •16.3. Design of a Galilean Viewfinder
- •Endnotes
- •17.1. Finding a Lens Design Solution
- •17.1.1 The Case of as Many Aberrations as There Are Degrees of Freedom
- •17.1.2 The Case of More Aberrations Than Free Variables
- •17.1.3 What Is an Aberration?
- •17.1.4 Solution of the Equations
- •17.2. Optimization Principles
- •17.3. Weights and Balancing Aberrations
- •17.4. Control of Boundary Conditions
- •17.5. Tolerances
- •17.6. Program Limitations
- •17.7. Lens Design Computing Development
- •17.8. Programs and Books Useful for Automatic Lens Design
- •17.8.1 Automatic Lens Design Programs
- •17.8.2 Lens Design Books
- •Endnotes
- •Index
Chapter 11 |
321 |
Also, if the stop is located at an aspheric surface, the ypr there will be zero, and the only aberration to be affected by the asphericity is the spherical aberration.
11.7.4 A Thin Lens in the Plane of an Image
This case is exemplified by a field lens or a field flattener. We cannot now use the thin-lens contribution formulas already given because both the stop and the image cannot lie in the same plane. Consequently, we have to return to the surface contribution formulas and add them up for the case in which y ¼ 0. When this is done, we find that for a thin lens situated in an image plane
SC ¼ CC ¼ AC ¼ 0; LchC ¼ TchC ¼ 0
The Petzval sag PC has its usual value of –12 h002=f 0N, where N is the index of the glass. The distortion must be carefully evaluated. It turns out to be
DC ¼ 21 h002u00 |
Nf 0 u1 |
r1 |
þ r2 |
lpr1 |
|||
|
|
ypr |
1 |
|
N |
1 |
|
where f 0 is the focal length of the thin lens. The distortion contribution depends on the shape of the thin lens in addition to its focal length and refractive index.
ENDNOTES
1H. Coddington, A Treatise on the Reflexion and Refraction of Light, p. 66. Simpkin and Marshall, London (1829).
2Coddington’s book was digitized by the Google Books Project and is freely available to read at http://books.google.com/books/download/A_Treatise_on_the_Reflection_and_Refract. pdf?id¼WI45AAAAcAAJ&output¼pdf&sig¼ACfU3U0eX3OvIkczIHZL5iJSyLEFEJza- A. This 1829 treatise likely was read by Gauss and Petzval, the contributions by both occurring over a decade later. Those interested in understanding the fundamentals of optics should read Coddington’s book. Coddington credits the works of Professor Airy and Mr. Herschel’s invaluable (sic) article on light in the Encyclopedia Metropolitana.
3A. E. Conrady, p. 588.
4T. Smith, “The contributions of Thomas Young to geometrical optics,” Proc. Phys. Soc., 62B:619 (1949).
5Not to be confused with the entrance pupil coordinate.
6A. E. Conrady, p. 739.
7A. E. Conrady, pp. 290-294.
8B. K. Johnson, Optical Design and Lens Computation, p. 118, Hatton Press, London (1948).
9H. H. Emsley, Aberrations of Thin Lenses, p. 194, Constable, London, (1956).
10B. K. Johnson, pp. 93-118.
11R. Barry Johnson, “Balancing the astigmatic fields when all other aberrations are absent,” Appl. Opt., 32(19):3494-3496 (1993).
322 |
|
|
The Oblique Aberrations |
||
12 |
p |
ð |
|
Þ |
|
Spot sizes are about equal when the field angle is 2=3 |
|
80% |
|
of the full field angle. |
|
13Seymour Rosin, “Concentric Lenses,” JOSA, 49(9):862-864 (1959).
14R. Barry Johnson, Texas Instruments, Dallas, Texas.
15Allen Mann, Infrared Optics and Zoom Lenses, Second Edition, pp. 60-61, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA (2009).
16In addition to spherical aberration discussed in Section 6.4, coma and astigmatism are also present.
17See also Section 7.4.3.
18Donald C. O’Shea, Elements of Modern Optical Design, pp. 214-215, Wiley, New York (1985).
19U.S. Patent 404,506 (1888).
20A stop is located 11.75 before the first surface of the doublet lens, which is the location of the front or anterior focal point. The stop is also the entrance pupil. The principal ray passes through the front focal point and emerges from the lens parallel to the optical axis at the corresponding image height. This is known as the telecentric condition.
21D. P. Feder, “Conrady’s chromatic condition,” J. Res. Nat. Bur. Std., 52:47 (1954); Res. Paper 2471.
22For at least the monochromatic case, the entrance and exit pupil will be located at the nodal points if the aperture stop is placed at the optical center of the lens. The limitations of the entrance pupil shape and position related to large field angles still apply. See Section 3.3.7.
23A. E. Conrady, pp. 314, 751.
24D. P. Feder, “Optical calculations with automatic computing machinery,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 41:633 (1951).
25It should be realized that the j4 term and the conic constant both affect the primary aberrations; however, they do not create the same surface contour and should not in general ever be used at the same time on a specific surface. It is most common to use the conic constant. Any aspheric coefficient affects its own order level and those higher but not lower.
Chapter 12
Lenses in Which Stop Position
Is a Degree of Freedom
It is obvious that, depending on its position in a lens system, a stop selects some rays from an oblique pencil and rejects others. Thus, if the stop is moved along the axis (or for that matter, if it is displaced sideways, but that case will not be considered here), some of the former useful rays will be excluded while other previously rejected rays are now included in the image-forming beam. Consequently, unless the lens happens to be perfect, a longitudinal stop shift changes all the oblique aberrations in a lens. It will not affect the axial aberrations provided the aperture diameter is changed as necessary to maintain a constant f-number.
12.1 THE H0 – L PLOT
The results of a stop shift can be readily studied by tracing a number of meridional rays at some given obliquity through the lens, and plotting a graph connecting the intersection length L of each ray from the front lens vertex as an abscissa, with the intersection height H0 of that ray at the paraxial image plane as ordinate. This graph (Figure 12.1a) is similar to the meridional ray plot in Figure 8.7 discussed in Section 8.2, except that the abscissas have reversed signs, so that the upper rim ray of the beam now appears at the left end of the graph while the lower rim ray falls at the right, as illustrated in Figure 12.1b. Locating a stop in any position selects a portion of the graph and rejects the rest of it. The ray passing though the center of the stop is, of course, the principal ray of the useful beam.
Figure 12.1b shows the lens with the stop in front. The dashed line extending from the top of the stop to the plot in Figure 12.1a indicates the height of the principal ray in the Gaussian image plane. The diameter of the beam of light from the left is limited by the stop. If the obliquity angle is increased, it is evident that the lower rim ray is determined by the stop while the upper rim ray will be vignetted by the top of the lens. The outer vertical dashed lines from the axial crossing points of the upper and lower rim rays bound the portion of the H 0 L plot that corresponds to the aforementioned meridional ray fan plot. Assuming that the
Copyright # 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
323 |
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374301-5.00016-4
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lenses in Which Stop Position Is a Degree of Freedom |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
H′ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Lagrange |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–5 |
0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stop
(b)
Figure 12.1 A typical H 0 L graph for a meniscus lens.
stop, having diameter D, is limiting the beam diameter at the obliquity y under study, the distance along the axis having intersections with the upper and lower rays defining the beam is simply D=tan y. In Figure 12.1 these axial intersections are shown by the vertical dashed lines. This distance is centered on the principal ray intersection.
This graph tells us a great deal about the aberrations in the image and how they will be changed when the stop is shifted along the axis. It should be understood that this technique can be used with a lens of any complexity, not just a simple singlet. Let us now explore how to interpret H0 L plots.
12.1.1 Distortion
The height of the graph at the principal-ray point above or below the Lagrangian image height is a direct measure of the distortion. As shown in Figure 12.1a, the principal-ray point is below the Lagrangian image height which means the distortion is negative.
12.1.2 Tangential Field Curvature
The first derivative or slope of the graph at the principal-ray point is a measure of the sag of the tangential field Zt0, a quantity that is ordinarily determined by the Coddington equations. If the slope is upward from left to right it
