- •Lens Design Fundamentals
- •Contents
- •Preface to the Second Edition
- •Preface to the First Edition
- •A Special Tribute to Rudolf Kingslake
- •1.1. Relations Between Designer and Factory
- •1.1.1 Spherical versus Aspheric Surfaces
- •1.1.2 Establishment of Thicknesses
- •1.1.3 Antireflection Coatings
- •1.1.4 Cementing
- •1.1.5 Establishing Tolerances
- •1.1.6 Design Tradeoffs
- •1.2. The Design Procedure
- •1.2.1 Sources of a Likely Starting System
- •1.2.2 Lens Evaluation
- •1.2.3 Lens Appraisal
- •1.2.4 System Changes
- •1.3. Optical Materials
- •1.3.1 Optical Glass
- •1.3.2 Infrared Materials
- •1.3.3 Ultraviolet Materials
- •1.3.4 Optical Plastics
- •1.4. Interpolation of Refractive Indices
- •1.4.1 Interpolation of Dispersion Values
- •1.4.2 Temperature Coefficient of Refractive Index
- •1.5. Lens Types to be Considered
- •2.1. Introduction
- •2.1.1 Object and Image
- •2.1.2 The Law of Refraction
- •2.1.3 The Meridional Plane
- •2.1.4 Types of Rays
- •2.1.5 Notation and Sign Conventions
- •2.2. Graphical Ray Tracing
- •2.3. Trigonometrical Ray Tracing at a Spherical Surface
- •2.3.1 Program for a Computer
- •2.4. Some Useful Relations
- •2.4.1 The Spherometer Formula
- •2.4.2 Some Useful Formulas
- •2.4.3 The Intersection Height of Two Spheres
- •2.4.4 The Volume of a Lens
- •2.5. Cemented Doublet Objective
- •2.6. Ray Tracing at a Tilted Surface
- •2.6.1 The Ray Tracing Equations
- •2.6.2 Example of Ray Tracing through a Tilted Surface
- •2.7. Ray Tracing at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1. Tracing a Paraxial Ray
- •3.1.1 The Standard Paraxial Ray Trace
- •3.1.2 The (y – nu) Method
- •3.1.3 Inverse Procedure
- •3.1.4 Angle Solve and Height Solve Methods
- •3.1.6 Paraxial Ray with All Angles
- •3.1.7 A Paraxial Ray at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1.9 Matrix Approach to Paraxial Rays
- •3.2. Magnification and the Lagrange Theorem
- •3.2.1 Transverse Magnification
- •3.2.2 Longitudinal Magnification
- •3.3. The Gaussian Optics of a Lens System
- •3.3.1 The Relation between the Principal Planes
- •3.3.2 The Relation between the Two Focal Lengths
- •3.3.3 Lens Power
- •3.3.4 Calculation of Focal Length
- •3.3.5 Conjugate Distance Relationships
- •3.3.6 Nodal Points
- •3.3.7 Optical Center of Lens
- •3.3.8 The Scheimpflug Condition
- •3.4. First-Order Layout of an Optical System
- •3.4.1 A Single Thick Lens
- •3.4.2 A Single Thin Lens
- •3.4.3 A Monocentric Lens
- •3.4.4 Image Shift Caused by a Parallel Plate
- •3.4.5 Lens Bending
- •3.4.6 A Series of Separated Thin Elements
- •3.4.7 Insertion of Thicknesses
- •3.4.8 Two-Lens Systems
- •3.5. Thin-Lens Layout of Zoom Systems
- •3.5.1 Mechanically Compensated Zoom Lenses
- •3.5.2 A Three-Lens Zoom
- •3.5.4 A Four-Lens Optically Compensated Zoom System
- •3.5.5 An Optically Compensated Zoom Enlarger or Printer
- •Endnotes
- •4.1. Introduction
- •4.2. Symmetrical Optical Systems
- •4.3. Aberration Determination Using Ray Trace Data
- •4.3.1 Defocus
- •4.3.2 Spherical Aberration
- •4.3.3 Tangential and Sagittal Astigmatism
- •4.3.4 Tangential and Sagittal Coma
- •4.3.5 Distortion
- •4.3.6 Selection of Rays for Aberration Computation
- •4.3.7 Zonal Aberrations
- •4.3.8 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Astigmatism
- •4.3.9 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Coma
- •4.3.10 Higher-Order Contributions
- •4.4. Calculation of Seidel Aberration Coefficients
- •Endnotes
- •5.1. Introduction
- •5.2. Spherochromatism of a Cemented Doublet
- •5.2.4 Secondary Spectrum
- •5.2.5 Spherochromatism
- •5.3. Contribution of a Single Surface to the Primary Chromatic Aberration
- •5.4. Contribution of a Thin Element in a System to the Paraxial Chromatic Aberration
- •5.5. Paraxial Secondary Spectrum
- •5.7.1 Secondary Spectrum of a Dialyte
- •5.7.2 A One-Glass Achromat
- •5.8. Chromatic Aberration Tolerances
- •5.8.1 A Single Lens
- •5.8.2 An Achromat
- •5.9. Chromatic Aberration at Finite Aperture
- •5.9.1 Conrady’s D – d Method of Achromatization
- •5.9.3 Tolerance for the D – d Sum
- •5.9.5 Paraxial D – d for a Thin Element
- •Endnotes
- •6.1. Surface Contribution Formulas
- •6.1.1 The Three Cases of Zero Aberration at a Surface
- •6.1.2 An Aplanatic Single Element
- •6.1.3 Effect of Object Distance on the Spherical Aberration Arising at a Surface
- •6.1.4 Effect of Lens Bending
- •6.1.6 A Two-Lens Minimum Aberration System
- •6.1.7 A Four-Lens Monochromat Objective
- •6.2. Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •6.3. Primary Spherical Aberration
- •6.3.1 At a Single Surface
- •6.3.2 Primary Spherical Aberration of a Thin Lens
- •6.4. The Image Displacement Caused by a Planoparallel Plate
- •6.5. Spherical Aberration Tolerances
- •6.5.1 Primary Aberration
- •6.5.2 Zonal Aberration
- •Endnotes
- •7.1. The Four-Ray Method
- •7.2. A Thin-Lens Predesign
- •7.2.1 Insertion of Thickness
- •7.2.2 Flint-in-Front Solutions
- •7.3. Correction of Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •7.4. Design Of an Apochromatic Objective
- •7.4.1 A Cemented Doublet
- •7.4.2 A Triplet Apochromat
- •7.4.3 Apochromatic Objective with an Air Lens
- •Endnotes
- •8.1. Passage of an Oblique Beam through a Spherical Surface
- •8.1.1 Coma and Astigmatism
- •8.1.2 Principal Ray, Stops, and Pupils
- •8.1.3 Vignetting
- •8.2. Tracing Oblique Meridional Rays
- •8.2.1 The Meridional Ray Plot
- •8.3. Tracing a Skew Ray
- •8.3.1 Transfer Formulas
- •8.3.2 The Angles of Incidence
- •8.3.3 Refraction Equations
- •8.3.4 Transfer to the Next Surface
- •8.3.5 Opening Equations
- •8.3.6 Closing Equations
- •8.3.7 Diapoint Location
- •8.3.8 Example of a Skew-Ray Trace
- •8.4. Graphical Representation of Skew-Ray Aberrations
- •8.4.1 The Sagittal Ray Plot
- •8.4.2 A Spot Diagram
- •8.4.3 Encircled Energy Plot
- •8.4.4 Modulation Transfer Function
- •8.5. Ray Distribution from a Single Zone of a Lens
- •Endnotes
- •9.1. The Optical Sine Theorem
- •9.2. The Abbe Sine Condition
- •9.2.1 Coma for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •9.3. Offense Against the Sine Condition
- •9.3.1 Solution for Stop Position for a Given OSC
- •9.3.2 Surface Contribution to the OSC
- •9.3.3 Orders of Coma
- •9.3.4 The Coma G Sum
- •9.3.5 Spherical Aberration and OSC
- •9.4. Illustration of Comatic Error
- •Endnotes
- •10.1. Broken-Contact Type
- •10.2. Parallel Air-Space Type
- •10.3. An Aplanatic Cemented Doublet
- •10.4. A Triple Cemented Aplanat
- •10.5. An Aplanat with A Buried Achromatizing Surface
- •10.6. The Matching Principle
- •Endnotes
- •11.1. Astigmatism and the Coddington Equations
- •11.1.1 The Tangential Image
- •11.1.2 The Sagittal Image
- •11.1.3 Astigmatic Calculation
- •11.1.5 Astigmatism for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •11.1.6 Astigmatism at a Tilted Surface
- •11.2. The Petzval Theorem
- •11.2.1 Relation Between the Petzval Sum and Astigmatism
- •11.2.2 Methods for Reducing the Petzval Sum
- •11.3. Illustration of Astigmatic Error
- •11.4. Distortion
- •11.4.1 Measuring Distortion
- •11.4.2 Distortion Contribution Formulas
- •11.4.3 Distortion When the Image Surface Is Curved
- •11.5. Lateral Color
- •11.5.1 Primary Lateral Color
- •11.6. The Symmetrical Principle
- •11.7. Computation of the Seidel Aberrations
- •11.7.1 Surface Contributions
- •11.7.2 Thin-Lens Contributions
- •11.7.3 Aspheric Surface Corrections
- •11.7.4 A Thin Lens in the Plane of an Image
- •Endnotes
- •12.1.1 Distortion
- •12.1.2 Tangential Field Curvature
- •12.1.3 Coma
- •12.1.4 Spherical Aberration
- •12.2. Simple Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.1 Simple Rear Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.2 A Simple Front Landscape Lens
- •12.3. A Periscopic Lens
- •12.4. Achromatic Landscape Lenses
- •12.4.1 The Chevalier Type
- •12.4.2 The Grubb Type
- •12.5. Achromatic Double Lenses
- •12.5.1 The Rapid Rectilinear
- •12.5.3 Long Telescopic Relay Lenses
- •12.5.4 The Ross “Concentric” Lens
- •Endnotes
- •13.1. The Design of a Dagor Lens
- •13.2. The Design of an Air-Spaced Dialyte Lens
- •13.4. Double-Gauss Lens with Cemented Triplets
- •13.5. Double-Gauss Lens with Air-spaced Negative Doublets
- •Endnotes
- •14.1. The Petzval Portrait Lens
- •14.1.1 The Petzval Design
- •14.1.2 The Dallmeyer Design
- •14.2. The Design of a Telephoto Lens
- •14.3. Lenses to Change Magnification
- •14.3.1 Barlow Lens
- •14.3.2 Bravais Lens
- •14.4. The Protar Lens
- •14.5. Design of a Tessar Lens
- •14.5.1 Choice of Glass
- •14.5.2 Available Degrees of Freedom
- •14.5.3 Chromatic Correction
- •14.5.4 Spherical Correction
- •14.5.5 Correction of Coma and Field
- •14.5.6 Final Steps
- •14.6. The Cooke Triplet Lens
- •14.6.2 The Thin-Lens Predesign of the Bendings
- •14.6.3 Calculation of Real Aberrations
- •14.6.4 Triplet Lens Improvements
- •Endnotes
- •15.1. Comparison of Mirrors and Lenses
- •15.2. Ray Tracing a Mirror System
- •15.3. Single-Mirror Systems
- •15.3.1 A Spherical Mirror
- •15.3.2 A Parabolic Mirror
- •15.3.3 An Elliptical Mirror
- •15.3.4 A Hyperbolic Mirror
- •15.4. Single-Mirror Catadioptric Systems
- •15.4.1 A Flat-Field Ross Corrector
- •15.4.2 An Aplanatic Parabola Corrector
- •15.4.3 The Mangin Mirror
- •15.4.4 The Bouwers–Maksutov System
- •15.4.5 The Gabor Lens
- •15.4.6 The Schmidt Camera
- •15.4.7 Variable Focal-Range Infrared Telescope
- •15.4.8 Broad-Spectrum Afocal Catadioptric Telescope
- •15.4.9 Self-Corrected Unit-Magnification Systems
- •15.5. Two-Mirror Systems
- •15.5.1 Two-Mirror Systems with Aspheric Surfaces
- •15.5.2 A Maksutov Cassegrain System
- •15.5.3 A Schwarzschild Microscope Objective
- •15.5.4 Three-Mirror System
- •15.6. Multiple-Mirror Zoom Systems
- •15.6.2 All-Reflective Zoom Optical Systems
- •15.7. Summary
- •Endnotes
- •16.1. Design of a Military-Type Eyepiece
- •16.1.1 The Objective Lens
- •16.1.2 Eyepiece Layout
- •16.2. Design of an Erfle Eyepiece
- •16.3. Design of a Galilean Viewfinder
- •Endnotes
- •17.1. Finding a Lens Design Solution
- •17.1.1 The Case of as Many Aberrations as There Are Degrees of Freedom
- •17.1.2 The Case of More Aberrations Than Free Variables
- •17.1.3 What Is an Aberration?
- •17.1.4 Solution of the Equations
- •17.2. Optimization Principles
- •17.3. Weights and Balancing Aberrations
- •17.4. Control of Boundary Conditions
- •17.5. Tolerances
- •17.6. Program Limitations
- •17.7. Lens Design Computing Development
- •17.8. Programs and Books Useful for Automatic Lens Design
- •17.8.1 Automatic Lens Design Programs
- •17.8.2 Lens Design Books
- •Endnotes
- •Index
1.3 Optical Materials |
11 |
against spatial frequency. Such a graph contains very much information both as to the resolving power of the lens and the contrast in the image of coarse objects. Moreover, in calculating the MTF values, diffraction effects can be taken into account, the result being the most comprehensive representation of lens performance that can be obtained. If the lens is then constructed with dimensions agreeing exactly with the design data, it is possible to measure the MTF experimentally and verify that the lens performance has come up to the theoretical expectations.
1.2.4 System Changes
When working by hand or with a small computer, the designer will have to decide what changes he should make to remove the residual aberrations in his lens. This is often a very difficult problem, and in the following chapters many hints are given as to suitable modifications that should be tried even when using a lens design program. Often a designer will make small trial changes in some of the lens parameters and determine the rate of change, or “coefficient,” of each aberration with respect to each change. The solution of a few simultaneous equations will then indicate some reasonable changes that might be tried, although the extreme nonlinearity of all optical systems makes this procedure not as simple as one would like.
Today there are many programs for use on a high-speed computer in which a large number of aberrations are changed simultaneously by varying several lens parameters, using a least-squares technique. In spite of the enormous amount of computation required in this process, it can be performed remarkably cheaply on today’s personal computers (see Chapter 17). A skew ray trace through a spherical surface would take an experienced human computer using a Marchant mechanical calculator about 500 seconds per ray surface (pre-1955). Today, the time has been reduced using a multiprocessor personal computer to about less than 10 ns or about fifty billion times faster!
1.3 OPTICAL MATERIALS
The most common lens material is, of course, optical glass, but crystals and plastics are frequently used, while mirrors can be made of essentially anything that is capable of being polished. Liquid-filled lenses have often been proposed,
but for many obvious reasons they were practically never used until recently.26,27,28,29 Optical materials in general have been discussed by Kreidl and Rood30 and others.31,32
12 |
The Work of the Lens Designer |
1.3.1 Optical Glass
There are several well-known manufacturers of optical glass, and their catalogs give an enormous amount of information about the glasses that are available; in particular, the Schott catalog is virtually a textbook of optical glasses and their properties.
Optical glasses are classified roughly as crowns, flints, barium crowns, and so on, but the boundaries of the various classes are not tightly standardized (see Figure 5.5). Optically, glasses differ from one another in respect to refractive index, dispersive power, and partial dispersion ratio, while physically they differ in color, density, thermal properties, chemical stability, bubble content, striae, and ease of polishing.
Glasses vary enormously in cost, over a range of at least 300 to 1 from the densest lanthanum crowns to the most common ordinary plate glass, which is good enough for many simple applications. One of the lens designer’s most difficult problems is how to make a wise choice of glass types, and in doing so he must weigh several factors. A high refractive index leads to weaker surfaces and therefore smaller aberration residuals, but high-index glasses are generally expensive, and they are also dense so that a pound of glass makes fewer lenses. If lens quality is paramount, then of course any glass can be used, but if cost is important the lower-cost glasses must be chosen.
The cost of material in a small lens is likely to be insignificant, but in a large lens it may be a very serious matter, particularly as only a few types are made in large pieces (the so-called “massive optics”), and the price per pound is likely to vary as much as the cube of the weight of the piece. It is perhaps surprising to note that in a lens of 12 in. diameter made of glass having a density of 3.5, each millimeter in thickness adds nearly 0.75 lb to the weight.
The color of glass is largely a matter of impurities, and some manufacturers offer glass with less yellow color at a higher price. This is particularly important if good transmission in the near ultraviolet is required. A trace of yellow color is often insignificant in a very small or a very thin lens and, of course, in aerial camera lenses yellow glass is quite acceptable because the lens will be used with a yellow filter anyway.
It will be found that the cost of glass varies greatly with the form of the pieces, whether in random slabs or thin rolled sheets, whether it is annealed, and whether it has been selected on the basis of low stria content. Some lens makers habitually mold their own blanks, and then it is essential to give these blanks a slow anneal to restore the refractive index to its stable maximum value; this is the value stated by the manufacturer on the melt sheet supplied with the glass.
1.3 Optical Materials |
13 |
A most useful feature of modern lens design programs is their inclusion of extensive catalogs of the optical properties of glasses available from the various suppliers as well as many plastics and materials useful in the infrared.
1.3.2 Infrared Materials
Infrared-transmitting materials are a study in themselves, and many articles have appeared in books and journals listing these substances and their properties.33 With few exceptions, they are not generally usable in the visible, however, because of light scatter at the crystal boundaries. An example of an exception is CLEARTRAN™ which is a water-free zinc sulfide material with transmittance from about 0.4 to 12 mm.
1.3.3 Ultraviolet Materials
For the ultraviolet region of the spectrum we have only relatively few materials that include UV-grade fused silica, crystal quartz, calcium fluoride, magnesium fluoride, sapphire, and lithium fluoride, with a few of the lighter glasses when in thin sections. With the advent of integrated circuits, the demand for finer and finer optical resolution to make masks to produce the integrated circuits and to image onto the silicon wafer, significant design and fabrication effort has been expended over the past several decades. Often these optical systems are catadioptric (see Chapter 15), but sometimes they are purely refractive. It should also be realized that these lenses are very, very expensive due to the cost of materials, fabrication, and alignment.34,35,36
1.3.4 Optical Plastics
In spite of the paucity of available types of optical plastics suitable for lens
manufacture, plastics have found extensive application in this field since World War I and particularly since the early 1950s.37,38,39 Since that time hundreds of
millions of plastic lenses have been fitted to inexpensive cameras, and they are now used regularly in eyeglasses and many other applications. Plastic triplets of f/8 aperture were first introduced by the Eastman Kodak Company in 1959, the “crown” material being methyl methacrylate and the “flint” a copolymer of styrene and acrylonitrile. The refractive indices of available optical
14 |
The Work of the Lens Designer |
plastics are typically very low, so that they fall into the region below the old crown–flint line, along with liquids and a few special titanium flints. The presently available optical plastics are shown in Table 1.3 and properties of frequently used plastic optical materials are provided in Table 1.4.
These refractive index and dispersion data are not highly precise since they depend on such factors as the degree of polymerization and the temperature. The spectral dispersion curves for acrylic, polystyrene, and polycarbonate modeled in the optical design programs CODE V, OSLO, and ZEMAX showed nontrivial differences (up to about 0.005).40 This is an example where the lens designer should take care to be certain the optical material data are adequately valid for the intended purpose.
Table 1.3
Currently Available Plastic Optical Materials
Plastic |
Trade Name |
Nd |
V-value |
|
|
|
|
Allyl diglycol carbonate |
CR-39 |
1.498 |
53.6 |
Polymethyl methacrylate |
Lucite/PMMA |
1.492 |
57.8 |
Polystyrene |
|
1.591 |
30.8 |
Copolymer styrene-methacrylate |
Zerlon |
1.533 |
42.4 |
Copolymer methylstyrene-methyl methacrylate |
Bavick |
1.519 |
|
Polycarbonate |
Lexan |
1.586 |
29.9 |
Polyester-styrene |
|
1.55 |
43 |
Cellulose ester |
|
1.48 |
47 |
Copolymer styrene acrylonitrile |
Lustran |
1.569 |
35.7 |
Amorphous polyethylene terephthalate |
APET |
1.571 |
|
Proprietary |
LENSTAR |
1.557 |
|
Pentaerythritol tetrakis thioglycolate |
PETG |
1.563 |
|
Polyvinyl chloride |
PVC |
1.538 |
|
Polymethyl a-chloroacrylate |
|
1.517 |
57 |
Styrene acrylnitrile |
SAN |
1.436 |
|
Poly cyclohexyl methacrylate |
|
1.506 |
57 |
Poly dimethyl itaconate |
|
1.497 |
62 |
Polymethylpentene |
TPX |
1.463 |
|
Poly diallyl phthalate |
|
1.566 |
33.5 |
Polyallyl methacrylate |
|
1.519 |
49 |
Polyvinylcyclohexene dioxide |
|
1.53 |
56 |
Polyethylene dimethacrylate |
|
1.506 |
54 |
Poly vinyl naphthalene |
|
1.68 |
20 |
Glass resin (Type 100) |
|
1.495 |
40.5 |
Cyclic olefin copolymer |
COC/COP |
1.533 |
30.5 |
Acrylic |
PMMA |
1.491 |
57.5 |
Methyl methacrylate styrene copolymer |
NAS |
1.564 |
|
Blend of KRO3 & SMMA |
NAS-21 Novacor |
1.563 |
33.5 |
Polyolefin |
Zeonex |
1.525 |
56.3 |
|
|
|
|
Table 1.4
Properties of Frequently Used Plastic Optical Materials
|
Acrylic |
Polycarbonate |
Polystyrene |
|
Cyclic Olefin |
Cyclic Olefin |
Ultem 1010 |
||
Properties |
(PMMA) |
(PC) |
(PS) |
|
Copolymer |
Polymer |
(PEI) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refractive index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NF (486.1 nm) |
1.497 |
1.599 |
1.604 |
1.540 |
1.537 |
1.689 |
|||
Nd (587.6 nm) |
1.491 |
1.585 |
1.590 |
1.530 |
1.530 |
1.682 |
|||
NC (656.3 nm) |
1.489 |
1.579 |
1.584 |
1.526 |
1.527 |
1.653 |
|||
Abbe value |
57.2 |
34.0 |
30.8 |
58.0 |
55.8 |
18.94 |
|||
Transmission (%) |
92 |
85 91 |
87 92 |
92 |
92 |
36 82 |
|||
Visible spectrum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.174 mm thickness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deflection temp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 F/min @ 66 psi |
214 F/101 C |
295 F/146 C |
230 F/110 C |
|
266 F/130 C |
266 F/130 C |
410 F/210 C |
||
3.6 F/min @ 264 psi |
198 F/92 C |
288 F/142 C |
180 F/82 C |
|
253 F/123 C |
263 F/123 C |
394 F/201 C |
||
Max continuous |
198 F |
255 F |
180 F |
|
266 F |
|
266 F |
338 F |
|
service temperature |
92 C |
124 C |
82 C |
|
130 C |
|
130 C |
170 C |
|
Water absorption % (in |
0.3 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.25 |
|||
water, 73 F for 24 hrs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific gravity |
1.19 |
1.20 |
1.06 |
1.03 |
1.01 |
1.27 |
|||
Hardness |
M97 |
M70 |
M90 |
M89 |
M89 |
M109 |
|||
Haze (%) |
1 to 2 |
1 to 2 |
2 to 3 |
1 to 2 |
1 to 2 |
– |
|||
Coeff of linear exp cm X |
6.74 |
6.6 7.0 |
6.0 8.0 |
6.0 7.0 |
6.0 7.0 |
4.7 5.6 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 5/cm/ C |
8.5 |
11.8 to 14.3 |
12.0 |
10.1 |
8.0 |
|
|
||
dN/dT X 10 5/ C |
– |
||||||||
Impact strength (ft-lb/in) |
0.3 0.5 |
12 17 |
0.35 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.60 |
|||
(Izod notch) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key advantages |
Scratch |
Impact |
Clarity |
High moisture |
Low |
Impact |
|||
|
resistance |
strength |
Lowest |
|
barrier |
|
birefringence |
|
resistance |
|
Chemical |
Temperature |
cost |
High modulus |
Chemical |
Thermal and |
|||
|
resistance |
resistance |
|
Good eletrical |
|
resistance |
|
chemical |
|
|
High Abbe |
|
|
|
properties |
Completely |
|
resistance |
|
|
Low dispersion |
|
|
|
|
|
amorphous |
High index |
|
Source: Reprinted by permission of G-S Plastic Optics.
