- •Lens Design Fundamentals
- •Contents
- •Preface to the Second Edition
- •Preface to the First Edition
- •A Special Tribute to Rudolf Kingslake
- •1.1. Relations Between Designer and Factory
- •1.1.1 Spherical versus Aspheric Surfaces
- •1.1.2 Establishment of Thicknesses
- •1.1.3 Antireflection Coatings
- •1.1.4 Cementing
- •1.1.5 Establishing Tolerances
- •1.1.6 Design Tradeoffs
- •1.2. The Design Procedure
- •1.2.1 Sources of a Likely Starting System
- •1.2.2 Lens Evaluation
- •1.2.3 Lens Appraisal
- •1.2.4 System Changes
- •1.3. Optical Materials
- •1.3.1 Optical Glass
- •1.3.2 Infrared Materials
- •1.3.3 Ultraviolet Materials
- •1.3.4 Optical Plastics
- •1.4. Interpolation of Refractive Indices
- •1.4.1 Interpolation of Dispersion Values
- •1.4.2 Temperature Coefficient of Refractive Index
- •1.5. Lens Types to be Considered
- •2.1. Introduction
- •2.1.1 Object and Image
- •2.1.2 The Law of Refraction
- •2.1.3 The Meridional Plane
- •2.1.4 Types of Rays
- •2.1.5 Notation and Sign Conventions
- •2.2. Graphical Ray Tracing
- •2.3. Trigonometrical Ray Tracing at a Spherical Surface
- •2.3.1 Program for a Computer
- •2.4. Some Useful Relations
- •2.4.1 The Spherometer Formula
- •2.4.2 Some Useful Formulas
- •2.4.3 The Intersection Height of Two Spheres
- •2.4.4 The Volume of a Lens
- •2.5. Cemented Doublet Objective
- •2.6. Ray Tracing at a Tilted Surface
- •2.6.1 The Ray Tracing Equations
- •2.6.2 Example of Ray Tracing through a Tilted Surface
- •2.7. Ray Tracing at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1. Tracing a Paraxial Ray
- •3.1.1 The Standard Paraxial Ray Trace
- •3.1.2 The (y – nu) Method
- •3.1.3 Inverse Procedure
- •3.1.4 Angle Solve and Height Solve Methods
- •3.1.6 Paraxial Ray with All Angles
- •3.1.7 A Paraxial Ray at an Aspheric Surface
- •3.1.9 Matrix Approach to Paraxial Rays
- •3.2. Magnification and the Lagrange Theorem
- •3.2.1 Transverse Magnification
- •3.2.2 Longitudinal Magnification
- •3.3. The Gaussian Optics of a Lens System
- •3.3.1 The Relation between the Principal Planes
- •3.3.2 The Relation between the Two Focal Lengths
- •3.3.3 Lens Power
- •3.3.4 Calculation of Focal Length
- •3.3.5 Conjugate Distance Relationships
- •3.3.6 Nodal Points
- •3.3.7 Optical Center of Lens
- •3.3.8 The Scheimpflug Condition
- •3.4. First-Order Layout of an Optical System
- •3.4.1 A Single Thick Lens
- •3.4.2 A Single Thin Lens
- •3.4.3 A Monocentric Lens
- •3.4.4 Image Shift Caused by a Parallel Plate
- •3.4.5 Lens Bending
- •3.4.6 A Series of Separated Thin Elements
- •3.4.7 Insertion of Thicknesses
- •3.4.8 Two-Lens Systems
- •3.5. Thin-Lens Layout of Zoom Systems
- •3.5.1 Mechanically Compensated Zoom Lenses
- •3.5.2 A Three-Lens Zoom
- •3.5.4 A Four-Lens Optically Compensated Zoom System
- •3.5.5 An Optically Compensated Zoom Enlarger or Printer
- •Endnotes
- •4.1. Introduction
- •4.2. Symmetrical Optical Systems
- •4.3. Aberration Determination Using Ray Trace Data
- •4.3.1 Defocus
- •4.3.2 Spherical Aberration
- •4.3.3 Tangential and Sagittal Astigmatism
- •4.3.4 Tangential and Sagittal Coma
- •4.3.5 Distortion
- •4.3.6 Selection of Rays for Aberration Computation
- •4.3.7 Zonal Aberrations
- •4.3.8 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Astigmatism
- •4.3.9 Tangential and Sagittal Zonal Coma
- •4.3.10 Higher-Order Contributions
- •4.4. Calculation of Seidel Aberration Coefficients
- •Endnotes
- •5.1. Introduction
- •5.2. Spherochromatism of a Cemented Doublet
- •5.2.4 Secondary Spectrum
- •5.2.5 Spherochromatism
- •5.3. Contribution of a Single Surface to the Primary Chromatic Aberration
- •5.4. Contribution of a Thin Element in a System to the Paraxial Chromatic Aberration
- •5.5. Paraxial Secondary Spectrum
- •5.7.1 Secondary Spectrum of a Dialyte
- •5.7.2 A One-Glass Achromat
- •5.8. Chromatic Aberration Tolerances
- •5.8.1 A Single Lens
- •5.8.2 An Achromat
- •5.9. Chromatic Aberration at Finite Aperture
- •5.9.1 Conrady’s D – d Method of Achromatization
- •5.9.3 Tolerance for the D – d Sum
- •5.9.5 Paraxial D – d for a Thin Element
- •Endnotes
- •6.1. Surface Contribution Formulas
- •6.1.1 The Three Cases of Zero Aberration at a Surface
- •6.1.2 An Aplanatic Single Element
- •6.1.3 Effect of Object Distance on the Spherical Aberration Arising at a Surface
- •6.1.4 Effect of Lens Bending
- •6.1.6 A Two-Lens Minimum Aberration System
- •6.1.7 A Four-Lens Monochromat Objective
- •6.2. Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •6.3. Primary Spherical Aberration
- •6.3.1 At a Single Surface
- •6.3.2 Primary Spherical Aberration of a Thin Lens
- •6.4. The Image Displacement Caused by a Planoparallel Plate
- •6.5. Spherical Aberration Tolerances
- •6.5.1 Primary Aberration
- •6.5.2 Zonal Aberration
- •Endnotes
- •7.1. The Four-Ray Method
- •7.2. A Thin-Lens Predesign
- •7.2.1 Insertion of Thickness
- •7.2.2 Flint-in-Front Solutions
- •7.3. Correction of Zonal Spherical Aberration
- •7.4. Design Of an Apochromatic Objective
- •7.4.1 A Cemented Doublet
- •7.4.2 A Triplet Apochromat
- •7.4.3 Apochromatic Objective with an Air Lens
- •Endnotes
- •8.1. Passage of an Oblique Beam through a Spherical Surface
- •8.1.1 Coma and Astigmatism
- •8.1.2 Principal Ray, Stops, and Pupils
- •8.1.3 Vignetting
- •8.2. Tracing Oblique Meridional Rays
- •8.2.1 The Meridional Ray Plot
- •8.3. Tracing a Skew Ray
- •8.3.1 Transfer Formulas
- •8.3.2 The Angles of Incidence
- •8.3.3 Refraction Equations
- •8.3.4 Transfer to the Next Surface
- •8.3.5 Opening Equations
- •8.3.6 Closing Equations
- •8.3.7 Diapoint Location
- •8.3.8 Example of a Skew-Ray Trace
- •8.4. Graphical Representation of Skew-Ray Aberrations
- •8.4.1 The Sagittal Ray Plot
- •8.4.2 A Spot Diagram
- •8.4.3 Encircled Energy Plot
- •8.4.4 Modulation Transfer Function
- •8.5. Ray Distribution from a Single Zone of a Lens
- •Endnotes
- •9.1. The Optical Sine Theorem
- •9.2. The Abbe Sine Condition
- •9.2.1 Coma for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •9.3. Offense Against the Sine Condition
- •9.3.1 Solution for Stop Position for a Given OSC
- •9.3.2 Surface Contribution to the OSC
- •9.3.3 Orders of Coma
- •9.3.4 The Coma G Sum
- •9.3.5 Spherical Aberration and OSC
- •9.4. Illustration of Comatic Error
- •Endnotes
- •10.1. Broken-Contact Type
- •10.2. Parallel Air-Space Type
- •10.3. An Aplanatic Cemented Doublet
- •10.4. A Triple Cemented Aplanat
- •10.5. An Aplanat with A Buried Achromatizing Surface
- •10.6. The Matching Principle
- •Endnotes
- •11.1. Astigmatism and the Coddington Equations
- •11.1.1 The Tangential Image
- •11.1.2 The Sagittal Image
- •11.1.3 Astigmatic Calculation
- •11.1.5 Astigmatism for the Three Cases of Zero Spherical Aberration
- •11.1.6 Astigmatism at a Tilted Surface
- •11.2. The Petzval Theorem
- •11.2.1 Relation Between the Petzval Sum and Astigmatism
- •11.2.2 Methods for Reducing the Petzval Sum
- •11.3. Illustration of Astigmatic Error
- •11.4. Distortion
- •11.4.1 Measuring Distortion
- •11.4.2 Distortion Contribution Formulas
- •11.4.3 Distortion When the Image Surface Is Curved
- •11.5. Lateral Color
- •11.5.1 Primary Lateral Color
- •11.6. The Symmetrical Principle
- •11.7. Computation of the Seidel Aberrations
- •11.7.1 Surface Contributions
- •11.7.2 Thin-Lens Contributions
- •11.7.3 Aspheric Surface Corrections
- •11.7.4 A Thin Lens in the Plane of an Image
- •Endnotes
- •12.1.1 Distortion
- •12.1.2 Tangential Field Curvature
- •12.1.3 Coma
- •12.1.4 Spherical Aberration
- •12.2. Simple Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.1 Simple Rear Landscape Lenses
- •12.2.2 A Simple Front Landscape Lens
- •12.3. A Periscopic Lens
- •12.4. Achromatic Landscape Lenses
- •12.4.1 The Chevalier Type
- •12.4.2 The Grubb Type
- •12.5. Achromatic Double Lenses
- •12.5.1 The Rapid Rectilinear
- •12.5.3 Long Telescopic Relay Lenses
- •12.5.4 The Ross “Concentric” Lens
- •Endnotes
- •13.1. The Design of a Dagor Lens
- •13.2. The Design of an Air-Spaced Dialyte Lens
- •13.4. Double-Gauss Lens with Cemented Triplets
- •13.5. Double-Gauss Lens with Air-spaced Negative Doublets
- •Endnotes
- •14.1. The Petzval Portrait Lens
- •14.1.1 The Petzval Design
- •14.1.2 The Dallmeyer Design
- •14.2. The Design of a Telephoto Lens
- •14.3. Lenses to Change Magnification
- •14.3.1 Barlow Lens
- •14.3.2 Bravais Lens
- •14.4. The Protar Lens
- •14.5. Design of a Tessar Lens
- •14.5.1 Choice of Glass
- •14.5.2 Available Degrees of Freedom
- •14.5.3 Chromatic Correction
- •14.5.4 Spherical Correction
- •14.5.5 Correction of Coma and Field
- •14.5.6 Final Steps
- •14.6. The Cooke Triplet Lens
- •14.6.2 The Thin-Lens Predesign of the Bendings
- •14.6.3 Calculation of Real Aberrations
- •14.6.4 Triplet Lens Improvements
- •Endnotes
- •15.1. Comparison of Mirrors and Lenses
- •15.2. Ray Tracing a Mirror System
- •15.3. Single-Mirror Systems
- •15.3.1 A Spherical Mirror
- •15.3.2 A Parabolic Mirror
- •15.3.3 An Elliptical Mirror
- •15.3.4 A Hyperbolic Mirror
- •15.4. Single-Mirror Catadioptric Systems
- •15.4.1 A Flat-Field Ross Corrector
- •15.4.2 An Aplanatic Parabola Corrector
- •15.4.3 The Mangin Mirror
- •15.4.4 The Bouwers–Maksutov System
- •15.4.5 The Gabor Lens
- •15.4.6 The Schmidt Camera
- •15.4.7 Variable Focal-Range Infrared Telescope
- •15.4.8 Broad-Spectrum Afocal Catadioptric Telescope
- •15.4.9 Self-Corrected Unit-Magnification Systems
- •15.5. Two-Mirror Systems
- •15.5.1 Two-Mirror Systems with Aspheric Surfaces
- •15.5.2 A Maksutov Cassegrain System
- •15.5.3 A Schwarzschild Microscope Objective
- •15.5.4 Three-Mirror System
- •15.6. Multiple-Mirror Zoom Systems
- •15.6.2 All-Reflective Zoom Optical Systems
- •15.7. Summary
- •Endnotes
- •16.1. Design of a Military-Type Eyepiece
- •16.1.1 The Objective Lens
- •16.1.2 Eyepiece Layout
- •16.2. Design of an Erfle Eyepiece
- •16.3. Design of a Galilean Viewfinder
- •Endnotes
- •17.1. Finding a Lens Design Solution
- •17.1.1 The Case of as Many Aberrations as There Are Degrees of Freedom
- •17.1.2 The Case of More Aberrations Than Free Variables
- •17.1.3 What Is an Aberration?
- •17.1.4 Solution of the Equations
- •17.2. Optimization Principles
- •17.3. Weights and Balancing Aberrations
- •17.4. Control of Boundary Conditions
- •17.5. Tolerances
- •17.6. Program Limitations
- •17.7. Lens Design Computing Development
- •17.8. Programs and Books Useful for Automatic Lens Design
- •17.8.1 Automatic Lens Design Programs
- •17.8.2 Lens Design Books
- •Endnotes
- •Index
Chapter 8
Oblique Beams
An oblique beam (also called a pencil) of rays from an extraaxial (or off-axis or nonaxial) object point contains meridional rays that can be traced by the ordinary computing procedures already described, and also a large number of skew rays that do not lie in the meridional plane. Each skew ray intersects the meridional plane at the object point and again at a “diapoint” in the image space, and nowhere else. Skew rays require special ray-tracing procedures, which will be discussed in Section 8.3. These are much more complex than for a meridional ray, and it is observed that skew rays were seldom used before the advent of electronic computers; now they are routinely traced by all lens designers since the available computing power of even the most common personal computer is extraordinarily great.
In Chapter 4, we discussed both axial and off-axis/nonaxial aberrations in an analytical sense rather than a causal sense. Axial aberrations have been investigated in some detail in the last several chapters. In this chapter, we will begin a more detailed study of field-dependent astigmatic and comatic aberrations. We begin by looking at the origin of coma and astigmatism, and then the role various types of stops have in lens systems. The remainder of the chapter discusses general ray tracing and graphical representation of skew ray aberrations.
8.1PASSAGE OF AN OBLIQUE BEAM THROUGH A SPHERICAL SURFACE
8.1.1 Coma and Astigmatism
When a light beam is refracted obliquely through a spherical surface, several new aberrations arise that do not appear on the lens axis. To understand why this is so, we may consider the diagram in Figure 8.1 showing a single refracting surface and an aperture stop that admits a circular cone of rays from an off-axis object point B. We label the rays through the rim of the aperture by their position angles taken counterclockwise from the top as viewed from the image
Copyright # 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
227 |
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374301-5.00012-7
228 |
Oblique Beams |
0
K
270 90
180
B
Lens surface as seen from object
Upper |
ray |
|
ray Lower
K
Principal |
ray |
|
|
|
axis |
Auxiliary |
|
T |
S |
B |
|
|
L |
C |
U |
Lens axis |
|
|
Figure 8.1 Origin of coma and astigmatism.
space, so that the upper ray is called 0 and the lower ray 180 , while the front and rear sagittal rays become 90 and 270 , respectively. The line joining the object point B to the center of curvature of the surface, C, is called the auxiliary axis, and obviously there is complete rotational symmetry around this axis just as there is rotational symmetry around the lens axis for an axial object point.
Moreover, because of this symmetry, every ray from the object point B passing through the aperture stop must cross the auxiliary axis somewhere in the image space. If we could trace a paraxial ray from B along the auxiliary axis, it would form an image of B at, say, B0. However, because of the spherical aberration arising at the surface, the intersection point for all other rays will move along the auxiliary axis toward the surface by an amount proportional to the square (approximately) of the height of incidence of the ray above the auxiliary axis. Thus the upper limiting ray might cross the auxiliary axis at, say, U0, and the lower limiting ray at L0. It is at once evident that the upper and lower rays do not intersect each other on the principal ray but in general above or below it; the height of the intersection point above or below the principal ray is called the tangential coma (a relic of the old custom of calling meridional rays tangential because they form a tangential focal line).
To find the point at which the two sagittal rays at 90 and 270 intersect the auxiliary axis, we note that these rays are members of a hollow cone of rays centered about the auxiliary axis, all coming to the same focus on that axis. The upper ray of this hollow cone strikes the refracting surface at K, slightly higher than the principal ray, so that the spherical aberration of this ray will be a little greater than that of the principal ray, forming an image at S on the auxiliary axis (shown by the small circle). S lies below the principal ray on our diagram, which indicates the presence of some negative sagittal coma, but not as much as the tangential coma that we found previously. Indeed, it can be shown1 that for a very small aperture and obliquity, the tangential coma is three times the sagittal coma; the exaggerations in our diagram do not make this relation obvious, but at least both comas do have the same sign.
8.1 Passage of an Oblique Beam through a Spherical Surface |
229 |
We thus see that the extreme upper and lower rays of the marginal zone come to a focus at T, while the extreme front and rear rays come to a different focus at S. The longitudinal separation between S and T is called the astigmatism of the image, and evidently both coma and astigmatism arise whenever a light beam is refracted obliquely at a surface. It is essential to note that each surface in a lens has a different auxiliary axis, and that the proportion of coma and astigmatism therefore varies from surface to surface. It is thus possible to correct coma and astigmatism independently in a lens system provided there are sufficient degrees of freedom available.
In Sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4, additional information about computing astigmatism and coma using exact ray tracing and the relationship to aberration coefficients was presented. In the next chapter, we will discuss coma, the Abbe sine condition, and offense against the sine condition. Astigmatism, Coddington equations, the Petzval theorem, distortion, and lateral color are explored in more depth in Chapter 11. Also in that chapter, the important symmetry principle will be introduced.
8.1.2 Principal Ray, Stops, and Pupils
At this point, it is necessary to define several important terms. The aperture stop or stop of a lens is the limiting aperture associated with the lens that determines how large an axial beam may pass through the lens. The stop can be an element within the lens system or a mechanical element such as a hole in a disk. A mechanical stop that can vary its opening size is also called an iris.
The marginal ray, also called the rim ray, is the extreme ray from the axial point of the object through the edge of the stop. As discussed in Section 4.2, the entrance pupil is the image of the stop formed by all lenses preceding it when viewed from object space. It also is the reference surface used to define ray coordinates, that is, ðr; y; HyÞ. By convention, the entrance pupil is aberration free. In a similar manner, the exit pupil is the image of the stop formed by all lenses following it when viewed from image space. The exit pupil is used as a reference surface for exiting wavefronts from the lens. Very often the rays incident at the exit pupil are not rectilinearly mapped onto the exit pupil due to pupil aberrations.
Consideration of the mapping error is necessary to properly compute image energy distribution, MTF, and diffraction. These two pupils and the stop are all geometric images of one another. The entrance and exit pupils can each be real or virtual images of the aperture stop located at finite distances or at infinity dependent on the optical configuration before and after the stop. For example, if an aperture stop is placed between the object and a singlet lens, and closer to the lens than the focal length, then the entrance pupil is clearly real and the exit
230 |
Oblique Beams |
pupil is virtual. In general, the spatial location of the pupils with respect to the stop can be in order (for example [exit, entrance, stop], [entrance, exit, stop], and [entrance, stop, exit]).
The principal ray is defined as the ray emanating from an off-axis object point that passes through the center of the stop. In the absence of pupil aberrations, the principal ray also passes through the center of the entrance and exit pupils. As the obliquity angle of the principal ray increases, the defining apertures of the components comprising the lens may limit the passage of some of the rays in the entering beam, thereby causing the stop not to be filled with rays. The failure of an off-axis beam to fill the aperture stop is called vignetting.2 The ray centered between the upper and lower rays defining the oblique beam is called the chief ray. When the object moves to large off-axis locations, the entrance pupil often has a highly distorted shape, may be tilted, and/or displaced longitudinally and transversely, and no longer perpendicular to the lens axis.
Indeed, without this tilting of the entrance pupil a fisheye lens covering a full90 in the object space would not transmit any light at the edge of the field. Due to the vignetting and pupil aberrations, the chief and principal rays may become displaced from one another. In some cases, the principal ray is vignetted while the chief ray is never vignetted as long as light passes through the lens at the considered obliquity angle. The terms principal ray and chief ray are frequently used interchangeably; however, once vignetting occurs, the distinction must be made.
DESIGNER NOTE
It is important that the lens designer understands how the optical design program being used handles the aiming of the chief ray. Typically, the chief ray is aimed toward the center of the (vignetted) entrance pupil, which is generally acceptable in the early stages of design. In the final stages, the chief ray should be aimed at the center of the (vignetted) stop. The reason for this is that additional computational time is required to aim at the (vignetted) stop. Since the stop is a real surface, the entrance pupil may well suffer aberrations. If the entrance pupil is considered unaberrated, then the stop is likely aberrated in theory at least. A design that may appear quite satisfactory using an unaberrated entrance pupil can perform in practice differently since the actual stop is unaberrated, thereby changing what rays actually pass through the lens system! Remember that the vignetted stop is made up of portions of the actual stop and boundaries of various lens elements (see Section 8.1.3).
The field stop is an aperture that limits the passage of principal rays beyond a certain field angle. The image of the field stop when viewed from object space is called the entrance window and is called the exit window when viewed from image space. The field stop effectively controls the field of view of the lens
