Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Lens Design Fundamentals 2nd edition_Kingslake, Johnson_2009.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
7.38 Mб
Скачать

3.5 Thin-Lens Layout of Zoom Systems

93

Example

Suppose we wish to lay out an optically compensated zoom having R ¼ 3, with X ¼ 2.2. Then Eqs. (3-24) and (3-25) give

S ¼ 0:3; fb2 ¼ 3:84; fc2 ¼ 11:25

Since R is greater than 1, the two moving lenses will be positive and the fixed lens will be negative. Taking square roots gives

fb¼ 1:95959 and fc¼ 3:35410

Assuming that the initial separation between lenses a and b is to be 3.0, we find that the focal length of the front lens must be 7.15959, and the rear air space d 0b will be initially 1.69451. Using the (y – u) method, we calculate the data shown in Table 3.8.

Table 3.8

Performance of Example Zoom Lens

Shift of zoom components

Back focus

Image shift

Focal length

 

 

 

 

 

(Initial position)

–0.5

8.81839

–0.5357

 

 

0

8.85410

0

10.457

D ¼

0.5

8.41660

0.0625

 

1.0

7.85410

0

5.882

 

1.5

7.31839

–0.0357

 

 

2.0

6.85410

0

3.486

 

2.5

6.46440

0.1103

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is clear that the image plane passes through the three designated positions corresponding to D ¼ 0, 1, and 2, but it departs from that plane for all other values of D. These departures, commonly called loops, will be very noticeable if the system is made in a large size, but they can be rendered negligible if the zoom system is made fairly large and is used in front of a small fixed lens of considerable power, as on an 8-mm movie camera. It will be noticed, too, that the law connecting image distance with zoom movement is a cubic (Figure 3.27).

3.5.4 A Four-Lens Optically Compensated Zoom System

We can drastically reduce the sizes of the loops between the in-focus image positions by the use of a four-lens arrangement, as shown in Figure 3.28. Here we have a fixed front lens, followed by a pair of moving lenses coupled together

94

Paraxial Rays and First-Order Optics

Movement of zoom components

–0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

–0.5

0 0.3

Shift of image

Figure 3.27 Image motion with a three-lens optically compensated zoom system.

(h)

(a)

(b)

(c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fa fa

fb

fb

fc

 

X

 

S

 

 

 

BF

H

fh

Figure 3.28 Layout of a four-lens optically compensated zoom system.

with a fixed lens between them. The algebraic solution for the powers and spaces of the four lenses is similar to that already discussed, but it is vastly more complicated.

We now designate the separations between adjacent focal points in the three airspaces by H, X, and S, the X and S serving the same functions as before. The initial lens separations are

d 0h ¼ fh þ fa H d 0a ¼ fa þ fb þ X d 0b ¼ fb þ fc þ S

The initial focal length and the initial back focus are

fh fa fb fc

; f

f 2

fa2 þ HX

 

fa2S þ HXS fb2H

fa2S þ HXS fb2H

c þ

c

3.5 Thin-Lens Layout of Zoom Systems

95

respectively, the denominators being the same in each case. We now shift the moving elements by a distance D, so that S is increased by D, but H, X, and the back focus will be reduced by D. We then substitute 2D and 3D for D, and after three subtractions we obtain the relationship

fc2 fa2 þ HX þ fb2H fa2S HSX ðS X H þ 6DÞ ¼ 0

(3-26)

We can considerably simplify the problem by assuming that the moving lenses a and c have equal power. Then Eq. (3-26) becomes

fa4 fa2½ HX þ SðS X H þ 6DÞ& þ H fb2 SX ðS X H þ 6DÞ ¼ 0

We solve this for fb2 in terms of fa2, giving

f 2

 

fa2 þ HX

S

 

fa2

b

¼

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H

S X H þ 6D

Substituting fb2 in the original equation relating the back focus before and after the zoom shift, and noting that now S ¼ (X – 3D), we get

fa4 þ fa2ð2H 3DÞðH þ X 3DÞ

HðH DÞðH 2DÞðH 3DÞ ¼ 0

(3-27)

and

f 2

 

 

fa2 þ HX

 

fa2

 

X

3D

 

¼

H

H

 

Þ

 

b

 

3D þ ð

 

The focal-length range R, the ratio of the initial to the final focal lengths, is now

R ¼ fa2X þ XðH 3DÞð3D XÞ þ fb2ðH 3DÞ

HX þ fa2 ð3D XÞ Hfb2

This ratio R will be less than 1.0 if the moving lenses are negative.

Example

As an example we shall set up a system having the same range of focal lengths as in the last example, so that we can compare the sizes of the loops. We find that for this case we put X ¼ 3.5, D ¼ 1, and H ¼ 10.052343. The equations just given yield

fa2

¼ 25:130858

or

fa ¼ fc ¼ 5:0130687

fb2

¼ 24:380858

or

fb ¼ 4:937698

R ¼ 0:333333

ðS ¼ 0:5Þ

96

Paraxial Rays and First-Order Optics

The initial air spaces are

d h0

¼ fh þ fa H ¼ 0:5 ðsayÞ; hence fh ¼ 15:565412

d a0

¼ 3:424629

d b0

¼ 0:424629

We find that using these four lens elements, the overall focal length is negative, and so we must add a fifth lens at the rear to give us the desired positive focal lengths. To compare with the three-lens system in Section 3.5.3, we set the initial focal length at 3.486, which requires a rear lens having a focal length of 4.490131 located initially 4 units behind the fourth element. Tracing paraxial rays through this system, at a series of zoom positions, gives the data shown in Table 3.9 and is plotted in Figure 3.29 is on facing page.

It will be noticed that the loops are only about one-fiftieth of their former size, and that the error curve is now a quadratic. Obviously, with these very small errors, it would be quite reasonable to design a four-lens zoom of this type covering a much wider range of focal lengths, say 6:1 or even more, and this indeed has been done.

Table 3.9

Performance of Four-Element Optically-Compensated Zoom Lens

 

Shift of zoom components

Back focus

Image shift

Focal length

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Initial position)

–0.5

6.22805

–0.00383

 

 

 

D

0

6.23188

0

3.486

 

 

D ¼

0.5

6.23267

0.00079

 

 

 

1.0

6.23188

0

5.026

 

 

 

1.5

6.23120

–0.00068

 

 

 

 

2.0

6.23188

0

7.253

 

 

 

2.5

6.23352

0.00164

 

 

 

 

3.0

6.23188

0

10.458

 

 

 

3.5

6.21538

–0.01650

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.5.5An Optically Compensated Zoom Enlarger or Printer

Since the four-lens zoom discussed in Section 3.5.4 can be constructed with two equal positive lenses moving together between three negative lenses, it is obviously possible to remove the two outer negative lenses, leaving a three-lens zoom printer or enlarger system that has a quartic error curve. Equations (3-27) are now

fa4 þ fa2ð2H 3ÞðH þ X 3Þ HðH 1ÞðH 2ÞðH 3Þ ¼ 0

3.5 Thin-Lens Layout of Zoom Systems

97

Movement of zoom components

–0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

–0.02

–0.01

0

0.01

Shift of image

Figure 3.29 Image motion with a four-lens optically compensated zoom system.

and

fb ¼

f 2

 

f 2

(3-28)

X þ H

H 3 þ ðX 3Þ

 

2

 

a

 

a

 

These can be used to set up a system, taking the positive root for fa ¼ fc and the negative root fb. The H is the initial distance from the fixed object to the anterior focus of the front lens, the initial object distance being therefore (H – fa). The initial lens separations are respectively ( fa þ fb þ X) and ( fa þ fb þ X – 3).

Example

As an example, we will design such a zoom system with H ¼ –8 and X ¼ 2. The preceding formulas give fa ¼ fc ¼ 6.157183 and fb ¼ –2.667455. The separations are, respectively, 4.667455 and 1.667455 at the start; they will, of course, be increased or decreased as the zoom elements are moved to change the magnification. The overall distance from object to image is equal to 2(14.157183 þ 4.667455) ¼ 37.6493. Tracing rays by the (y – u) method gives the data shown in Table 3.10 on the next page.

The image shift is shown graphically in Figure 3.30. It will be noticed that as we are now moving a pair of positive components, the quadratic curve is in the opposite direction to that for the previous example, in which we moved a pair of negative lenses.

98 Paraxial Rays and First-Order Optics

Table 3.10

Performance of Example Optically-Compensated Enlarger or Printer Zoom Lens

 

 

Image

Desired image

Image

 

Shift of zoom components

distance

distance

shift

Magnification

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Initial position)

–0.5

17.762025

17.657184

þ0.104841

 

 

0

17.157184

17.157184

0

–1.7520

D ¼

0.5

16.646875

16.657184

–0.010309

 

1.0

16.157184

16.157184

0

–1.2071

 

1.5

15.661436

15.657184

þ0.004252

 

 

2.0

15.157184

15.157184

0

–0.8285

 

2.5

14.652316

14.657184

–0.004868

 

 

3.0

14.157184

14.157184

0

–0.5708

 

3.5

13.680794

13.657184

þ0.023610

 

Movement of zoom components

–0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

–0.05

0

0.05

0.10

Shift of image

Figure 3.30 Image motion for a zoom enlarger system.

If it is desired to cover a wider range of magnifications, the value of H should be reduced, and if the lenses come too close together, then X can be somewhat increased. Obviously there is no magic about the size, and if a different object-to-image distance is required, the entire system can be scaled up or down as needed. The fixed negative component is very strong and in practice it is often divided into a close pair of negative achromats, but we leave this up to the designer.