Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Glaucoma Surgery_Bettin, Khaw_2012
.pdfbe used due to established or expected punctate keratopathy, concomitant injection of a steroid is recommended to counterbalance the promotion of wound healing caused by the needling procedure itself and by possible minor bleeding.
After topical anesthesia, antibiotic instillation and disinfection of the conjunctiva with iodopovidone, an assistant holds the patient’s head against the front rest of the slit lamp and delicately but firmly rolls the upper lid skin with a cotton swab. The patient is asked to look down, and the needle is inserted temporally (and/or bent and inserted nasally) 5–10 mm away from the bleb area, so as to prevent aqueous leaks, and advanced towards the bleb while gently ballooning the conjunctiva with lidocaine. If the bleb is flat, the procedure should be aimed at trying to raise it and disrupt the fibrous adhesions sealing the flap, possibly inserting the needle under the edge of the flap which can be elevated with a sweeping motion. If the bleb is encysted and high, there is no reason to attain the flap, but multiple punctures are made in the Tenon cyst.
An immediate IOP drop (at values of 10 or below) indicates that aqueous flow has been restored, and is strongly associated with a longer survival of the filter [22]. Topical antibiotics are prescribed for one week after the procedure, and a topical steroid is (re) prescribed q.i.d., as after surgery. If there is at least a temporary effect, the procedure can be repeated. Reported success rates of one or more needling procedures vary in restoring adequate aqueous outflow range from 45% (at one year) [23] to 96% at 6 months [24] depending also on the heterogeneous inclusion and success criteria.
Mid-Term Complications (Weeks to Months after Surgery)
The mid-term follow-up of the operated patient can reveal many of the complications already described for the early follow-up, with a prevalence of those associated with an IOP above target due to progressive bleb fibrosis and failure. Even when the target IOP is attained, the patient may yet complain about a dysesthetic bleb, characterized by ocular discomfort, with symptoms such as foreign body sensation and visual disturbances, and signs such as tear film abnormalities and dellen formation. This condition is more common if the bleb is too large, or too nasal, or if it tends to invade the cornea, and may require bleb remodeling. Another complication is peculiar to nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery, and consists in the progressive reduction in permeability of the intact descemetic ‘window’, which appears inflected towards the intrascleral ‘lake’ on gonioscopy: the IOP rises, sometimes rather abruptly, but the bleb remains diffuse and nonhyperemic. This event is an indication for goniopuncture.
Bleb Remodeling
If the bleb is too large and extends nasally and temporally, or even over 360°, it can be demarcated and/or flattened by passing one or more X-shaped compression sutures
Postoperative Management of External Filtering Procedures |
59 |
under topical anesthesia [25], with 9-0 nylon. The sutures ought to be securely anchored at the limbus and distally at Tenon’s capsule, or better at the sclera, to allow effective tension. The functionally-excluded portions of the bleb can be filled one or more times with injected autologous blood to promote their obliteration [26]. Sutures are removed after some weeks. A bleb growing over the cornea can be shrunk with gentle cautery applications, possibly some weeks after functionally sealing the procident portion with a compression suture, to avoid creating a limbal leak.
Management of IOP Rise following Nonpenetrating Surgery: Goniopuncture
Goniopuncture is common after deep sclerectomy: its reported frequency ranges from 41 to 71% of the cases depending on eyes included, presence and type of implant, and duration of follow-up [27]. The probability of goniopuncture being performed at 3 years from surgery is 63% with a mean interval between surgery and laser treatment of 10 months [28].
Patients and general ophthalmologists should be informed that in case of progressive (sometimes rather abrupt) IOP rise accompanied by a reduction of the bleb size and height, goniopuncture is mandatory before restarting topical therapy or performing a surgical revision in all patients with a visible and nonruptured descemetic ‘window’, because the permeability of an intact Descemet’s membrane may decrease over time. In most cases, accurate gonioscopy reveals an inflexion of the membrane towards the intrascleral lake, but this aspect may be not clearly evident. The success rates of the procedure are high, with an 83% probability of achieving immediately an IOP below 15 mmHg, and a 2-year success rate of 68% [29].
After goniopuncture, hypotony can ensue, with all its possible consequences, but this is unlikely if the treatment is not done too early, whereas the most fearful complication of abruptly establishing a brisk aqueous outflow is suction and apposition of the iris to the descemetic ‘window’, sometimes with iris incarceration in the puncture site, since nonpenetrating surgery is characterized by the absence of surgical iridectomy. This complication was observed in 25% of the cases of a recent study on 173 consecutive goniopunctures [28] and generally causes an IOP spike, with ocular pain and visual reduction.
A tip to try to resolve an iris plugging of the goniopuncture (or of the internal ostium of a trabeculectomy) is to pharmacologically induce a very deep IOP drop (to relieve the pressure that pushes the iris against and inside the puncture), to perform a peripheral Nd:YAG iridotomy (to neutralize the pressure difference between posterior and anterior chamber), and to instill pilocarpine and carry out a peripheral iridoplasty right anterior to the iris plug, to try to pull the iris out of the ‘trap’. Unfortunately, some eyes are refractory to these attempts and require iris repositioning with a spatula, and in some rare cases the plug tends to relapse, requiring a basal surgical iridectomy.
60 |
Bettin |
As for the treatment technique, the author had a substantial reduction in the risk of iris plugs by avoiding goniopuncture in the first postoperative month and by carrying out a preliminary peripheral iridotomy one clock hour away from the ‘window’ and a localized iridoplasty in the area facing the window. To puncture Descemet’s membrane, laser is set just above the energy used for capsulotomy, and the beam is aimed through a goniomirror at the anterior and lateral corner(s) of the descemetic window [28]. I advise to stop shooting and check IOP as soon as a microhole is made in the membrane (microbubbles drained through the perforation often allow to witness it). At all subsequent controls, gonioscopy is performed to check the patency of the system.
Practically, and in terms of success, goniopuncture converts a deep sclerectomy into a trabeculectomy [30]. If following goniopuncture the IOP is still above target, deep sclerectomy can be further managed as a trabeculectomy, with laser suture lysis, needlings and 5-fluorouracil injections. In some cases, if IOP rises again over time, repeat goniopuncture can prove successful, probably because the initial one was very little or was blocked by tissue debris. The only maneuver that must be avoided or performed with great care is ocular massage, for the risk of iris incarceration that it brings about.
Goniopuncture can be carried out also after viscocanalostomy with significant hypotensive effect (37% of the eyes, 9 months after surgery on average, in a study of 57 eyes, with a mean immediate IOP drop of 39%) [31], although the aqueous dynamics may be different if no external filtration is present.
Late Complications (Months to Years after Surgery)
The most common untoward event that may occur months to years after filtering surgery is progressive filter failure: the patient comes back to the office several months after a last visit, with a high IOP unresponsive to ocular massage and with a flat and adherent bleb, either surrounded or completely invaded by tenacious fibrosis. Needling can be tried but is generally useless: the patient must be prescribed topical hypotensives, and is a potential candidate to new surgery. In contrast, particularly after MMC trabeculectomy, sometimes the bleb tends to become thinner and thinner due to the slow fibrodegenerative and erosive action of the aqueous, and finally the patient comes back to the office for an unscheduled visit, complaining about visual reduction and tearing, and biomicroscopy reveals a late bleb leak, with either a diffuse or a localized Seidel phenomenon, or even with bleb rupture due to inadvertent rubbing or trauma.
One final dreadful complication, always possible even many years after successful surgery, is bleb infection and endophthalmitis. All patients undergoing filtering surgery must be warned to limit exposure to potential sources of infection such as dirty water or dust and to keep a bottle of broad-spectrum antibiotic drops at hand starting hourly instillations and seeking specialist advice in case of ocular discharge, conjunctival hyperemia, ocular pain and blurred vision.
Postoperative Management of External Filtering Procedures |
61 |
Management of Late Bleb Leaks
Late leaks can be managed like early ones, but small thin blebs do not allow autologous blood injection, and most frequently the conjunctiva is too avascular and friable to allow suturing. In these cases, particularly those with minimal localized or diffuse Seidel phenomenon, a conservative approach consists in covering the bleb with a double layer of amniotic membrane, anchored with several 10-0 nylon mattress sutures. In addition to topical antibiotics, hypotensives are administered to reduce aqueous flow that would form a secondary pseudobleb between the conjunctiva and the amniotic membrane, thus limiting its repairing action. The discomfort created by the sutures can be partly reduced by applying a soft contact lens. When the conjunctiva is too compromised or torn, the only solution is to excise or de-epithelialize the compromised bleb area and cover it by mobilizing the fresh adjacent conjunctiva (separate dissection of conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule makes stretching easier), or by realizing a rotational or free tissue graft. Little or no tension should be applied to the sutures closing the cleft to avoid likely subsequent retraction of the graft with a relapse of the leak. Sometimes, the whole surgical site is severely compromised with full thickness leaks due to erosion of both conjunctiva and sclera (particularly in patients operated on during the early 1990s, with prolonged exposure to high MMC concentrations). These cases require a more thorough reconstruction, with patching of the sclera with pericardium or donor sclera in addition to conjunctival recovering.
References
1 Molteno ACB, Fucik M, Dempster AG, Bevin TH: Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study. Factors controlling capsule fibrosis around Molteno implants with histopathological correlation. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2198–2206.
2 Roth SM, Spaeth GL, Starita RJ, et al: The effects of postoperative corticosteroids on trabeculectomy and the clinical course of glaucoma: five-year fol- low-up study. Ophthalmic Surg 1991;22:724–729.
3 Nuyts RM, Felten PC, Pels E, et al: Histopathologic effects of mitomycin C after trabeculectomy in human glaucomatous eyes with persistent hypotony. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:225–237.
4 Fannin LA, Schiffman JC, Budenz D: Risk factors for hypotony maculopathy. Ophthalmology 2003; 110:1185–1191.
5 Fiore PM, Richter CU, Arzeno G, et al: The effect of anterior chamber depth on endothelial cell count after filtration surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107:1609–1611.
6 Gutierrez-Ortiz C, Moreno-Lopez M: Healon 5 as a treatment option for recurrent flat anterior chamber after trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29:635.
7 Luntz MH, Rosenblatt M: Malignant glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1987;32:73–93.
8 Chiou AG, Mermoud A, Hediguer SE: Malignant ciliary block glaucoma after deep sclerectomy: ultrasound biomicroscopy imaging. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1996;208:279–281.
9 Greenfield DS, Tello C, Budenz DL, Liebmann JM, Ritch R: Aqueous misdirection after glaucoma drainage device implantation. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:1035–1040.
10 Ramanathan US, Kumar V, O’Neill E, Shah P: Aqueous misdirection following needling of trabeculectomy bleb. Eye 2003;17:441–442.
11 Epstein DL, Steinert RF, Puliafito C: Nd:YAG laser therapy to the anterior hyaloid and aphakic malignant (ciliovitreal block) glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:137–143.
62 |
Bettin |
12 Herschler J: Laser shrinkage of the ciliary processes. A treatment for malignant (ciliary block) glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1980;87:1155–1158.
13 Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R: Treatment of malignant glaucoma with contact transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117: 688–690.
14 Ruben S, Tsai J, Hitchings R: Malignant glaucoma and its management. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81: 163–167.
15 Harbour JW, Rubsamen PE, Palmberg P: Pars plana vitrectomy in the management of phakic and pseudophakic malignant glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1073–1078.
16 Henderer JD, Heeg MC, Spaeth GL, et al: A randomized trial of the long-term effects of digital ocular compression in the late postoperative period. J Glaucoma 2001;10:266–270.
17 Kapetanski FM: Laser suture lysis after trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 2003;12:316–320.
18 Macken P, Buys Y, Trope GE: Glaucoma laser suture lysis. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:398–401.
19 Feldman RM, Tabet RR: Needle revision of filtering blebs. J Glaucoma 2008;17:594–600.
20 Sherwood MB, Spaeth GL, Simmons ST, et al: Cysts of Tenon’s capsule following filtration surgery. Medical management. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105: 1517–1521.
21 Costa VP, Correa MM, Kara-Jose N: Needling versus medical treatment in encapsulated blebs. A randomized prospective study. Ophthalmology 1997; 104:1215–1220.
22 Broadway DC, Bloom PA, Bunce C, Thaigarjan M, Khaw PT: Needle revision of failing and failed trabeculectomy blebs with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil: survival analysis. Ophthalmology 2004;111:665–673.
Paolo Bettin
Senior Consultant – Chief Glaucoma Service Department of Ophthalmology
University Scientific Institute San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60
IT–20132 Milan (Italy) E-Mail bettin.paolo@hsr.it
23 Shin DH, Kim YY, Ginde SY, Kim PH, Eliassi-Rada B, Khatana AK, Keole NS: Risk factors for failure of 5-fluorouracil needling revision for failed conjunctival filtration blebs. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132: 875–880.
24 Fagerly M, Lofors KT, Elsas T: Needling revision of failed filtering blebs after trabeculectomy: a retrospective study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81: 577–582.
25Palmberg P, Zacchei A: Compression sutures – a new treatment for leaking or painful filtering blebs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:S444.
26 Haynes WL, Alward WL: Combination of autologous blood injection and bleb compression sutures to treat hypotony maculopathy. J Glaucoma 1999;8: 384–387.
27 Mendrinos E, Mermoud A, Shaarawy T: Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2008;53:592–630.
28 Anand N, Pilling R: Nd:YAG laser goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy: outcomes. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:110–115.
29 Mermoud A, Karlen ME, Schnyder CC, et al: Nd:YAG goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999;30: 120–125.
30 Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A: Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma 2002;11:214–220.
31 Shaarawy T, Nguyen C, Schnyder C, Mermoud A: Five year results of viscocanalostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:441–445.
Postoperative Management of External Filtering Procedures |
63 |
Bettin P, Khaw PT (eds): Glaucoma Surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. Basel, Karger, 2012, vol 50, pp 64–78
Ocular Surface and External Filtration
Surgery: Mutual Relationships
Christophe Baudouin
Department of Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, INSERM, U968, UPMC University Paris 06, Institut de la Vision, Paris, and University of Versailles, St Quentin en Yvelines, France
Abstract
There is a large body of evidence from clinical and experimental studies that the long-term use of topical drugs may induce ocular surface changes, causing ocular discomfort, dry eye, conjunctival inflammation, subconjunctival fibrosis, corneal surface impairment, and, as a consequence of chronic ocular surface changes, the potential risk of failure for further glaucoma surgery. Subclinical inflammation has also been widely described in patients receiving antiglaucoma treatments for long periods of time, with inflammatory cell infiltration and fibroblast activation in the conjunctiva and subconjunctival space. The preservative, especially benzalkonium chloride, which has consistently demonstrated its toxic effects in laboratory, experimental, and clinical studies, could induce or enhance such inflammatory changes. As a quaternary ammonium, this compound causes tear film instability, loss of goblet cells, conjunctival squamous metaplasia and apoptosis, disruption of the corneal epithelium barrier, corneal nerve impairment, chronic inflammation and potential damage to deeper ocular tissues. Drug-induced adverse effects are therefore far from being restricted to only allergic reactions, but they are often very difficult to identify because they mostly occur in a delayed or poorly specific manner, and result from complex and multifactorial interactions between the drugs and the ocular surface. Postoperatively, the ocular surface also plays an important role, as the conjunctiva interacts with aqueous humor and subconjunctival fibrosis may block aqueous outflow and cause surgical failure. As preoperative inflammation underlies postoperative fibrosis and therefore surgical outcome, a better knowledge of ocular surface changes with appropriate evaluation and management should thus become a new paradigm in glaucoma care over the long term.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
The European Glaucoma Society has defined several risk factors for filtering surgery failure [1]: neovascular glaucoma, previous failed glaucoma filtration surgery, previous cataract surgery (conjunctival incision), aphakia (intracapsular surgery), recent intraocular surgery (less than 3 months), inflammatory eye disease (uveitis, ocular pemphigoid, Stevens-Johnson syndrome), Afro-Caribbean/Hispanic races, young age and chronic topical medications. This latter group of risk factors has thus become a major threat in glaucoma surgical outcome, as surgery is most often performed
after a long period of medical treatment and in conjunctivas having received multiple treatments for years or decades. Postoperative wound healing may be stimulated by conjunctival changes, involving release of inflammatory cytokines and growthpromoting factors. Persistent preoperative conjunctival inflammation is therefore associated with an enhanced scarring response. Long-term combination therapies of topically applied drugs induce clinically apparent or subclinical inflammation with overexpression of inflammatory markers in the conjunctiva [2–5]. The interactions between the ocular surface changes influenced by topical medications in the long run and surgical outcome thus deserve a growing interest and could in the future become a key for improving surgical results.
The Ocular Surface of Glaucomatous Patients
Several consistent observational studies have pointed out the higher prevalence of ocular surface involvement such as allergy or dry eye in glaucomatous patients treated over the long term [5–9]. Ocular symptoms and signs are therefore observed at rates ranging from 15 to 50%, much higher than in nonglaucomatous patients. In addition, a number of studies have clearly related the rate of symptoms or signs to the presence of the preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK) [6, 7] and the number of BAK-containing medications [9], and switching from BAK-containing to unpreserved eyedrops significantly improved these patients [6, 10]. The development of subconjunctival fibrosis has also been reported in patients treated with antiglaucoma medications for a long period of time, most likely resulting from an increase in fibroblast density in the subepithelial substantia propria, related to an increase in inflammatory cells [3, 4, 11, 12]. The long-term use of antiglaucoma medications has been shown to cause conjunctival foreshortening and shrinkage [13], which may be associated with an ocular pemphigoid-like condition (fig. 1) or evolve into severe scarring conjunctivitis with definitive corneal opacities [14].
Histopathological Changes of the Conjunctiva in Glaucoma
Histopathological techniques in conjunctival specimens taken at the time of glaucoma surgery clearly demonstrated that inflammation is abnormally present in the conjunctival epithelium and substantia propria. Sherwood et al. [11] compared two groups of patients, one with primary glaucoma surgery, the other one after long-term eyedrop therapy. A significant increase in the number of macrophages, lymphocytes, mast cells, and fibroblasts in the conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule and a significant decrease in the number of epithelial goblet cells were observed in the latter group. In another study, conducted on 124 conjunctival biopsy specimens from patients undergoing filtration surgery, Broadway et al. [3] found that administration of topical
Ocular Surface and External Filtration Surgery |
65 |
medication, irrespective of type, for 3 years or more, induced a significant degree of subclinical inflammation in the conjunctiva. Associations of two or more medications thus induced a significant decrease in goblet cells, an increase in pale cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes within the epithelium, and an increase in fibroblasts, macrophages, mast cells, and lymphocytes in the substantia propria. In addition, administration of one topical medication for more than 3 years was found to be associated with similar inflammatory and fibroblast infiltration. These data were directly correlated to risk of surgical failure [4]. Similarly, in mediumand long-term therapy patients, Nuzzi et al. [15] confirmed significant increases in the thickness and number of epithelial cell layers, in the fibroblast density in both subepithelial and deep connective tissue, and a more compact connective tissue, richer in collagen fibers arranged in whirls, with inflammatory elements and increased expression of inflammatory markers. Likewise, an immunohistological study in conjunctival biopsies and trabecular meshwork specimens from patients undergoing glaucoma surgery revealed that samples from patients who were receiving treatments had significantly greater expression of fibroblastic and inflammatory markers compared with untreated participants (fig. 2). Furthermore, patients who received multiple therapies had greater expression of markers compared with those who were on monotherapy [12]. Such findings were also found by Pozarowska et al. [16] who observed, in conjunctival specimens at time of surgery, patterns of inflammatory infiltration, thickening of the epithelium, decreased numbers of goblet cells, proliferation of fibroblasts, collagen deposition and fibrosis.
Impression Cytology Specimens in Glaucoma
Impression cytology is a well-known technique for collecting conjunctival epithelial cells in a minimally invasive way, very useful in investigations of ocular surface disorders (fig. 3). In glaucoma, several reports using impression cytology techniques showed consistent ocular surface changes in relation with topical treatments. Brandt et al. [17] showed statistically significant degrees of metaplasia in patients treated over the long term and associated with the number of medications. Clinical impairment of both tear secretion and stability, and a rapid decrease in goblet cell density were also demonstrated after starting treatment with preserved timolol [18]. High cytology scores of metaplasia were also found in various medication groups compared to an untreated control group [19].
In addition, immunocytological techniques have been developed to quantify HLADR expression in impression cytology specimens, a marker of inflammation normally not expressed by epithelial cells, unless in inflammatory processes. In an immunocytological study performed in glaucoma, conjunctival inflammatory antigens HLA DR and CD23, a low-affinity receptor for IgE, were found highly expressed in impression cytology specimens from patients with glaucoma treatment, compared to untreated
66 |
Baudouin |
Fig. 1. Drug-induced pseudopemphigoid.
Fig. 2. Conjunctival infiltration by inflammatory cells (green vimentin staining) in a glaucoma patient treated with 3 different drugs prior to surgery.
Fig. 3. Impression cytology showing a high density of dendritic inflammatory cells in a glaucomatous patient.
Ocular Surface and External Filtration Surgery |
67 |
glaucoma eyes or controls. The results were not related to a specific treatment or combination of antiglaucoma drugs. However, the proportion of positive specimens in eyes receiving chlorhexidine-containing eye drops was significantly lower than that found in the patients who had been in repetitive contact with antiglaucomatous treatments and their common preservative, BAK, which suggested for the first time that a large part of inflammatory changes in the conjunctiva could be induced by the preservative [20].
By further developing the technique of flow cytometry in impression cytology it was possible to demonstrate that glaucoma patients, even though clinically asymptomatic, exhibit significant overexpression of HLA-DR class II antigens, ICAM-1, or interleukins IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 in the epithelium [21–23]. Preserved drugs and multiple treatments reliably showed higher levels of inflammatory markers or cytokines. Similarly, another group using impression cytology specimens from glaucomatous patients investigated the expression of trefoil factor family TFF-1, MUC5AC, and HLA-DR, which were significantly higher in patients than in controls [24].
Using impression cytology, it was also possible to investigate markers associated with the T helper (Th) 1/Th2 profiles of inflammation in various ocular surface diseases, using the expression of CCR5 and CCR4, respectively [23]. The conjunctiva of glaucomatous patients expressed high levels of both CCR4 and CCR5, suggesting the simultaneous involvement of Th1, i.e. nonallergic inflammation like in dry eye, and Th2, i.e. allergy-related, pathways under the stimulation of topical drugs. This illustrates the complexity of the mechanisms occurring in the ocular surface in glaucoma, possibly involving allergic and toxic reactions, direct stimulation of inflammatory cells, impairment of the lacrimal film, destruction of goblet cells and epithelial cells and their further stimulation on an inflammatory mode. Although not significant, a tendency toward slight differences between the three prostaglandins was found with HLA-DR expression, parallel to the concentrations of BAK contained in the eye drops, namely the higher the concentration, the higher the HLA-DR expression. No apparent relationship could be established with the known frequency of hyperemia, which therefore seems to correspond to a different mechanism, likely not caused by inflammatory processes as found in conjunctival biopsies [25]. Interestingly, the inflammation induced by prostaglandin analogs, as assessed by HLA-DR expression in impression cytology, was also found by another group as early as one month after starting the treatment [26].
Clinical Evidence of Preservative-Induced Conjunctival Impairment
Only very few prospective studies have addressed the question of the deleterious role of the preservative, in part because of the current lack of preservative-free compounds and to a large extent because a normal ocular surface will experience weak toxic effects after a short duration of treatment, especially with a monotherapy, that
68 |
Baudouin |
