Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Glaucoma An Open Window to Neurodegeneration and Neuroprotection_Nucci, Cerulli, Osborne_2008.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
30.63 Mб
Скачать

contiguous cluster or are separated by points that are not in the database.

(3)For expansion of preexisting scotoma into contiguous points: (a) at least two previously normal points within the central 151 or three additional previously normal points outside at the central 151, each of which declines Z10 dB each on two consecutive fields; or, (b) at least two previously normal points within the central 151

or three previously normal points outside 151, each of which is depressed at a po5% level compared to baseline on two consecutive fields.

(4)For generalized depression: (a) a decline in the mean deviation that is significant at the po1% level and is not explained by media opacity or pupil size; or, (b) a CPSD that shows an obvious trend based on the last five consecutive fields; or,

(c)a decline of Z3 dB at all points on two consecutive fields that is not explained by media opacity or pupil size. PROGRESSION MUST BE CONFIRMED.

This method can also be considered as an event analysis, in that the progression criteria are based on test point sensitivity depression.

Methods based on event analyses may be unsuitable to detect small changes in progression over time due to the large variability typically found in depressed areas. It is also important to note that a percentage of flagged points (about 5%) is expected to worsen by chance alone and thus can be mistakenly taken as a defect. These drawbacks have been partially overcome in GPA, which requires confirmation of any defect variation before a judgment of progression is given.

Nonconventional VF testing techniques are seldom used for follow-up purposes, considering that SAP is currently the gold standard when glaucomatous defects are present. Frequency doubling technology (FDT), however, may prove to be promising and useful in detecting progression over time, which seems to be indicated by longterm studies (Haymes et al., 2005). The new Matrix perimeter, which is the second-generation FDT, is equipped with 30-2 and 24-2 threshold tests. These tests provide greater detail about defect location and morphology, thus making it theoretically easier and reliable in detecting progression.

71

In closing, it is important to note that whatever method is used to analyze progression, VF data must be considered together with retinal structural appearance and other pertinent clinical information. Structural damage may precede functional defects, and in some cases, other causes besides glaucoma may be involved in progression. Ophthalmologists should also remember that clinically relevant progression — that justifies a more aggressive therapeutic regimen — should only be considered when the change is statistically significant, reproducible, and indicative of glaucomatous damage.

Abbreviations

 

ABP

atypical birefringence patterns

AGIS

advanced glaucoma intervention

 

study

CIGTS

collaborative initial glaucoma

 

treatment study

CLV

corrected loss variance

CPSD

corrected pattern standard

 

deviation

dB

decibel

DDLS

disc damage likelihood scale

ECC

enhanced corneal compensator

EGS

European glaucoma society

EMGT

early manifest glaucoma trial

FDT

frequency doubling technology

GPA

glaucoma (or guided) progression

 

analysis

GSS

glaucoma staging system

HD

high definition

HRT

Heidelberg retina tomograph

Llarge

LV

loss variance

Mmedium

MD

mean deviation

NFA

nerve fiber analyzer

OCT

optical coherent tomography

OD

optic disc

ODDSS

optic disc damage staging system

PSD

pattern standard deviation

RNFL

retinal nerve fiber layer

Ssmall

SAP

standard automated perimetry

72

 

SITA

Swedish interactive

 

thresholding algorithm

TCA

topographic change analysis

TSNIT

temporal–superior–nasal–inferior–

 

temporal

VCC

variable corneal compensator

VF

visual field

VFI

visual field index

References

Anderson, D.R., Chauhan, B., Johnson, C., Katz, J., Patella, V.M. and Drance, S.M. (2000) Criteria for progression of glaucoma in clinical management and in outcome studies. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 130(6): 827–829.

Bagga, H., Greenfield, D.S. and Feuer, W.J. (2005) Quantitative assessment of atypical birefringence images using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 139(3): 437–446.

Brusini, P. (1996) Clinical use of a new method for visual field damage classification in glaucoma. Eur. J. Ophthalmol., 6(4): 402–407.

Brusini, P. and Filacorda, S. (2006) Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J. Glaucoma, 15(1): 40–46.

Brusini, P., Salvetat, M.T., Zeppieri, M., Tosoni, C., Parisi, L. and Felletti, M. (2006) Comparison between GDx scanning laser polarimetry and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of chronic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand., 84(5): 650–655.

Chauhan, B.C. (2005) Detection of glaucomatous changes in the optic disc. In: Fingeret M., Flanagan J.G. and Liebmann J.M. (Eds.), The Essential HRT Primer. Jocoto Advertising Inc., San Ramon, pp. 53–65.

Chauhan, B.C., Blanchard, J.W., Hamilton, D.C. and LeBlanc, R.P. (2000) Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41(3): 775–782.

Chauhan, B.C., LeBlanc, R.P., McCormick, T.A. and Rogers, J.B. (1994) Test–retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 118(1): 9–15.

Chauhan, B., McCormick, T.A., Nicolela, M.T. and LeBlanc, R.P. (2001) Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol., 119(10): 1492–1499.

Dreher, A.W. and Reiter, K.R. (1992) Retinal laser ellipsometry: a new method for measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness distribution. Clin. Vis. Sci., 7: 481–488.

European Glaucoma Society. (2003). Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. In: European Glaucoma Society (Ed.), Dogma Srl, Savona, Ch. 1, p. 30.

Fitzke, F.W., Hitchings, R.A., Poinoosawmy, D., McNaught, A.I. and Crabb, D.P. (1996) Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 80(1): 40–48.

Greenfield, D.S., Knighton, R.W. and Huang, X-R. (2000) Effect of corneal polarization axis on assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 129(6): 715–722.

Haymes, S.A., Hutchison, D.M., McCormick, T.A., Varma, D.K., Nicolela, M.T., LeBlanc, R.P. and Chauhan, B.C. (2005) Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequencydoubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 46(2): 547–554.

Heijl, A., Leske, M.C., Bengtsson, B., Bengtsson, B. and Hussein., M.The EMGT Group. (2003) Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand., 81(3): 286–293.

Hodapp, E., Parrish, R.K., II and Anderson, D.R. (1993) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. The CV Mosby Comp, St. Louis, 8: 98–114.

Hoffmann, E.M., Zangwill, L.M., Crowston, J.G. and Weinreb, R.N. (2007) Optic disk size and glaucoma. Surv. Ophthalmol., 52(1): 32–49.

Hougaard, J.L., Heijl, A. and Bengtsson, B. (2007) Glaucoma detection by Stratus OCT. J. Glaucoma, 16(3): 302–306.

Hudson, C.J.W., Kim, L.S., Hancock, S.A., Cunliffe, I.A. and Wild, J.M. (2007) Some dissociating factors in the analysis of structural and functional progressive damage in open-angle glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 91(5): 624–628.

Jaffe, G.J. and Caprioli, J. (2004) Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 137(1): 156–169.

Jonas, J.B., Budde, W.M. and Panda-Jones, S. (1999) Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv. Ophthalmol., 43(4): 293–320.

Katz, J. (1999) Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology, 106(2): 391–395.

Kocak, I., Zulauf, M., Hendrickson, P. and Stumpfig, D. (1997) Evaluation of the Brusini Staging System for follow-up in glaucoma. Eur. J. Ophthalmol., 7(4): 345–350.

Miglior, S., Albe´, E., Guareschi, M., Rossetti, L. and Orzalesi, N. (2002) Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology, 109(6): 1072–1077.

Mikelberg, F.S. and Drance, S.M. (1984) The mode of progression of visual field defects in glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 98(4): 443–445.

Musch, D.C., Lichter, P.R., Guire, K.E. and Standardi, C.L. (1999) The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study Group: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology, 106(4): 653–662.

Nouri-Mahdavi, K., Hoffman, D., Tannenbaum, D.P., Law, S.K. and Caprioli, J. (2004) Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 137(2): 228–235.

Owen, V.M.F., Strouthidis, N.G., Garway-Heath, D.F. and Crabb, D.P. (2006) Measurement variability in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph imaging of neuroretinal rim area. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 47(12): 5322–5330.

Reus, N.J. and Lemij, H.G. (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx VCC for glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 111(10): 1860–1865.

Spaeth, G.L., Henderer, J. and Steinmann, W. (2003) The disc damage likelihood scale: its use in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Highlights Ophthalmol., 31(4): 4–16.

Spaeth, G.L., Lopes, J.F., Junk, A.K., Grigorian, A.G. and Henderer, J. (2006) Systems for staging the amount of optic nerve damage in glaucoma: a critical review and new material. Surv. Ophthalmol., 51(4): 293–315.

Spry, P.G.D. and Johnson, C.A. (2002) Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss. Surv. Ophthalmol., 47(2): 158–173.

The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators (AGIS). (1998) Comparison of treatment outcomes within race: seven-year results. Ophthalmology, 105(7): 1146–1164.

73

Toth, M. and Hollo, G. (2005) Enhanced corneal compensation for scanning laser polarimetry on eyes with atypical polarisation patterns. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 89(9): 1139–1142.

Weinreb, R.N., Dreher, A.W., Coleman, A., Quigley, H., Shaw, B. and Reiter, K. (1990) Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch. Ophthalmol., 108(4): 557–560.

Wollstein, G., Schuman, J.S., Price, L.L., Aydin, A., Stark, P.C., Hertzmark, E., Lai, E., Ishikawa, H., Mattox, C., Fujimoto, J.G. and Paunescu, L.A. (2005) Optic coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal thickness in glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol., 123(4): 464–470.

Zhou, Q. and Weinreb, R.N. (2002) Individual compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 43(7): 2221–2228.

Zulauf, M. and Caprioli, J. (1992) What constitutes progression of glaucomatous visual field defects? Sem. Ophthalmol., 7(2): 130–146.