Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Eye Essentials Assessment and Investigative Techniques_Doshi, Harvey_2005

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.9 Mб
Скачать

Anterior confocal microscopy

173

Figure 10.6 Zeiss Stratus OCT

Figure 10.7 Macular hole image produced by ocular coherence tomography

Anterior confocal microscopy

Confocal microscopy has been a familiar technique in university and hospital research departments, allowing a practitioner to carry out cell counts, and monitor minor structural changes. Such work on the endothelium is the basis of much of our knowledge about how this structure changes with age or with

Advanced instrumentation

external insult (such as hypoxic stress) and much significant

174knowledge has been gained. Other research, such as looking at the effects of topical therapeutic agents, contact lenses and developmental variations may all be assessed in vivo with a significant advantage over in vitro techniques.

Like many other areas of optometric technology, the advances in refractive surgery have led to an increased demand for good resolution yet easy to achieve confocal corneal images. One of the best indications of postoperative corneal recovery (either for a photorefractive treatment such as Lasik or phototherapeutic intervention such as graft surgery) is to look for changes to cellular structure within the cornea, or to visualize debris build-up. For example, a high-resolution confocal view of the stroma post-Lasik may allow changes to the keratocytes to be detected, as well as increases in cell debris or corneal nerve changes. Doing this at intervals after surgery gives an excellent indication of corneal recovery and is an integral part of most refractive surgeons’ follow-up routine.

The technique also has a more noniatrogenic use, however, in the detection and monitoring of corneal disease. For example, the Langerhans cell population in the plane of the basal cell layer near the limbus is useful in assessing the keratoconic, particularly after a full-thickness graft. Cellular changes and guttata may be detected at an early stage in Fuch’s dystrophy. Microcystic response, either related to hypoxic insult or keratitis, may be monitored with much greater accuracy than a slit-lamp would afford. It is even possible to analyze erythrocyte flow in a neovascular response. Furthermore, the increasing use of mitomycin drugs in corneal recovery may be monitored. In summary, the confocal microscope adds an extra dimension

to corneal assessment over and beyond the slit-lamp and, as such, is an increasingly important tool in the armory of any corneal or contact lens specialist, either optometric or ophthalmologic. An extra benefit to being able to focus on any plane in the cornea is the ability to accurately assess corneal thickness.The distance between the confocal planes imaged

at the front and back surfaces of the cornea provides this information.

Topographers

Recently, an adapter to the HRT II (see earlier) allows the

 

confocal laser previously focused in the plane of the optic disc to

175

instead be focused at the cornea so providing a useful image of

 

any plane throughout the cornea.

 

Topographers

In 1847 the English physician Henry Goode used the reflection of a square target from the cornea to decide upon corneal shape in what is claimed to be the first keratoscope. Independently, in 1880 the Portuguese oculist Antonio Placido introduced the now famous black and white concentric ring target with a viewing hole to analyze the distortion of the reflected rings from the cornea; the first photokeratoscope. It is a variation of the Placido’s disk which is the basis of most modern computerized topographers. At this stage, assessment of corneal contour was primarily qualitative, with subjective assessment being made of distortion of the reflected image.The introduction of computer analysis of the reflected targets, which began in earnest in the late 1980s, allowed the development of the quantification of reflected image changes. By sampling changes to the image at many points, a very accurate profile of the corneal contour may be constructed, and then represented in a variety of representations or ‘maps’.

The various maps are usually color coded; red areas show where the cornea is steepest and blue areas where it is flatter (Figure 10.8). Difference maps may allow a change in profile, for example after contact lens wear, to be shown.

More recent topographers, such as the Orbscan, use a slit-beam scanning device which allows not only the anterior corneal surface profile to be measured, but also the posterior surface. Furthermore, topographers may also represent the tear profile underneath a contact lens, so providing a useful alternative to the far more subjective fluorescein assessment.

The increasing use of topographers in contact lens practice has led to some software to generate the ideal contact lens parameter for corneal fitting. It is also the basis of the resurgence in popularity of orthokeratology, where the deliberate remolding of the cornea

Advanced instrumentation

176

Figure 10.8 Topography – color-coded map. Note cooler colors indicate flatter areas, warmer colors are steeper

by selective lens fitting to overcome refractive error, where vastly improved accuracy and predictability has been made possible.

The increased use of topographers as part of the preoperative assessment before refractive surgery has also resulted in increasing numbers of early corneal dystrophies, such as keratoconus, to be detected.This shows that the machines

have a diagnostic as well as a biometric role.

Aberrometry

When describing the very great amount of aberration that affects light passing through the human eye, Helmholtz once remarked ‘If an optician wanted to sell me an instrument which had all these defects . . . I should give him back his instrument’. Refractive correction may compensate for the so-called lowerorder aberrations, but the final image is reduced by an array of

Aberrometry

higher-order aberrations.The impact of these may be measured

using an aberrometer.This relies upon an analysis of how a 177 wavefront passing through the eye is altered. If the eye is

aberration free, then an incident plane wave will be refracted to form a regular wave.The eye, however, is not aberration free and hence the resultant wave is distorted (Figure 10.9a,b). It is

Figure 10.9a Parallel rays from a distant object are focused at a point in an eye without aberrations

Figure 10.9b Parallel rays from a distant object are focussed at various retinal positions in an eye with aberrations

Advanced instrumentation

possible to measure the change from the regular wave at many

178points so recording the wavefront aberration. Most aberrometers use a system called the Hartmann–Shack.This employs an array of tiny lenses (lenslets) through which the aberrant wavefront passes. Each lenslet forms a point image which would be a perfect point for each were the wavefront to be aberration free. However, the point spread at each point focus reveals the overall aberration.The accurate analysis of this gives useful information which may be used, for example, in programing the laser used in refractive surgery such that the postoperative corneal profile has less aberrations, or in specifying contact lens design with minimal aberration for the cornea to which it is to be fitted.

Further reading

American Academy of Ophthalmology (1996) Preferred Practice Pattern: Primary Open Angle Glaucoma American Academy of Ophthalmology: San Francisco.

Index

A

Aberrometry, 176–179 Accommodation, and intraocular

pressure, 100–101 Acuity, visual see Visual acuity Adams test, 27

Altitudinal defect, 158, 159 Amiodrone keratopathy, 48 Amsler chart, 150–153

indications, 151–152 procedure, 152–153

Angioscotoma, 157

Angle-closure, risk with pupil dilation, 120–121

Anomalous trichromatism, 19–20, 23, 26 Anterior blepharitis, 50–51

Anterior chamber examination, 65–71, 80–96

adapted Smith’s method see Smith’s method, adapted

angle appearance, 80 angle estimation, 80

biometry and pachymetry, 87–92 depth assessment, 65–66, 80 gonioscopy, 80, 94–96 inflammatory particle assessment,

67–71 noninflammatory particle

assessment, 66–67 pen-torch shadow or eclipse technique, 86–87, 88

reasons for, 65

slit-image photography, 92–94 Smith’s method see Smith’s method van Herrick technique see van

Herrick technique

Anterior confocal microscopy, 173–175 Anterior segment examination, 59–77,

139–142

anterior chamber see Anterior chamber examination

anterior vitreous, 76–77 cornea, 59–65

iris and pupil, 71–73 lens, 73–76

photographic systems, 139–142 Anterior uveitis, 38, 68, 71–72

sarcoid granulomatous, 72 Anterior vitreous, examination, 76–77 Aqueous fluid drainage, 98–99 Arcuate bundles, 157

Arden gratings, 13–14 Asteroid hyalosis, 92

B

Bailey–Lovie chart, 5 Berger’s space, 77 Biometry, 87–92

laser interference, 90

see also Pachymetry; Ultrasound Birefringence, 166

Blebs, 64

Index

 

Blepharitis, 50–52

examination, 55–59

180

anterior, 50–51

forniceal, 57

posterior, 51–52

limbal, 57

 

 

Blind spot, 150–151

palpebral, 57

 

 

Blink pattern, 50

tarsal, 57

 

Blinking, and intraocular pressure, 101

Conjunctivitis, 56

 

Bowman’s layer, 62

Contact lenses

 

Busacca nodules, 71

fitting, 175–176, 179

 

C

fundus, 126–127

 

Contrast sensitivity, 11

 

Cataract

testing, 10–14

 

cortical, 76

Contrast sensitivity function (CSF),

 

detection in visual field assessment,

11

 

156

Contrast threshold, 11

 

nuclear, 75

Cornea, examination, 59–65

 

posterior subcapsular, 10

of contact lens wearer, 63

 

viewing in retinoscope, 40

corneal vascularization, 63

 

CCD chips, 137, 139

microcysts, 63

 

Central scotoma, 10, 152

see also Corneal lesions

 

Centrocecal defects, 157

Corneal apex, viewing, 41, 42

 

Cerebrovascular accident, 159

Corneal contour, 175, 176

 

Children, reading test for, 9

Corneal dystrophies, 176

 

Chloroquine, 152

Corneal edema, 104

 

Chorioretinitis, 154

Corneal endothelium, 62

 

Choroidal detachment, 105

viewing, 39, 40, 64–65

 

Choroidal neovascularization, 153

Corneal epithelium, 62

 

Chronic hypoxia, 64

Corneal hysteresis, 115

 

City University test, 28–29

Corneal lesions

 

City2000, 12

color, 62

 

CMOS chips, 137, 139

density, 61

 

Cobalt blue filter, 47–48, 52

depth, 62–63

 

Cobalt blue photography, 139

location, 60–61

 

Color vision deficiencies acquired, 27

size, 61

 

inheritance and genetics, 21–23

Corneal nerves, viewing, 39

 

prevalence of inherited, 20–21

Corneal recovery, postoperative, 174

 

types of inherited, 18–20

Corneal sections

 

Color vision examination, 23–29

formation, 37

 

Color Vision Testing Made Easy Test, 26

viewing, 36–38, 62

 

Computerized acuity charts, 12

Corneal stroma, 62

 

Confocal microscopy, anterior, 173–175

Corneal thickness

 

Confocal scanning technique, 164

influence on tonometry, 91, 108

 

Confrontation, 149

measurement, 90–92

 

Conjunctiva

Cortical cataract, 76

 

bulbar, 57

CSF, 11

 

degree of redness, 55–56

Cycloplegic drugs, 106

Index

D

checking for, 38, 70

 

 

D15 test, 27–28, 29

Floaters, 106

181

Decimal acuity scale, 3

Fluorescein

 

Descemet’s membrane, 62

in conjunctival examination, 59

 

 

Deutans, 25, 28–29

in tear film assessment, 54

 

colors confused by, 19–20

in tonometry, 111

 

Deutranomalous trichromatism, 19, 21

Focal retinal damage, 157

 

Deutranopia, 19, 21

Follicles, 57–59

 

Diabetics, 123

Foveon chips, 137

 

screening, 136, 144

Freckles, 72

 

Dichromatism, 19–20, 23

Frequency doubling, 160

 

Dicon visual field analyzer, 155

Fuch’s dystrophy, 174

 

Diffusing filters, 47

Fundus contact lenses, 126–127

 

Digital cameras, light-detection chips,

Fundus examination, 120

 

136–138

pupil dilation considerations,

 

Digital palpation, 106–107

120–122

 

Direct ophthalmoscopy, 122–127

retinal photographic systems,

 

advantages, 123

143–145

 

disadvantages, 123

see also Direct ophthalmoscopy;

 

fundus contact lenses, 126–127

Indirect ophthalmoscopy;

 

slit-lamp, 125–126

Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy

 

wide-field, 123–125

G

 

Distance acuity, 14

 

correlation with near acuity, 10

Gaze tracking, 156

 

Dry eye, 54–55

GDx, 166, 168

 

E

GDx Access, 166, 168

 

Genetics, of inherited color deficiency,

 

Episcleritis, 56

21–23

 

Erythrocyte flow, 174

Glaucoma, 104, 116

 

Eye examination, general, 49–59

adapted assessment for early-stage,

 

conjunctiva, 55–59

160

 

eyelids, 49–52

angle-closure, 73, 95, 104

 

tear film, 52–55

detection, 154, 155, 156, 157

 

Eyelids, examination, 49–52

incidence, 106

 

F

intraocular pressure and, 98,

 

104–105

 

Faculty of Ophthalmologists Times

nerve fiber layer analysis in

 

New

screening, 168

 

Roman near chart, 6–7

open-angle, 91, 97, 98, 104

 

Farnsworth D15 test, 27–28, 29

pigmentary, 66

 

Farnsworth–Munsell 100 hue test, 24

scanning laser tomography in

 

File formats, 141–142, 143

screening, 169–170, 172

 

Filters, in slit-lamp biomicroscope,

Goldmann contact tonometer,

 

47–49

109–112

 

Flare, 70, 71

Goldmann three-mirror lens, 126

 

Index

 

Gonioscopy, 80, 94–96

diurnal variation, 102–103

182

repeatable-use lens concerns, 80, 95

drugs, 104

Granulomas, iris, 71

extraocular muscle action, 102

 

 

Gross perimetry, 149, 150

food, 104

 

 

H

gender, 101

 

genetic factors, 101

 

Hartmann–Shack system, 178

ocular pulse, 102

 

Heat-reducing filters, 48

respiration, 102

 

Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT),

seasonal variation, 104

 

169

physiology, 98–99

 

Heijl–Krakau technique, 156

range in population, 100

 

Hemianopia, homonymous, 159

IOP see Intraocular pressure

 

Hill of vision, 148–149

Iris, examination, 71–73

 

Homonymous hemianopia, 159

Iris melanomas, 72–73

 

HRT II, 170–171, 175

Iris transillumination defects, 66

 

Hruby lens, 125–126

Iritis, 73

 

Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, 155,

Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates,

 

156, 160

24–26

 

Hyperemia, 55

K

 

degree of redness, 55–56

 

localization of, 55

Keeler A series chart, 8

 

Hypoxic insult, 174

Keratic precipitates (KP), 68–70

 

I

mutton-fat, 68, 69

 

pigmented, 68, 70

 

i-Care tonometer, 107

Keratitis, 174

 

Image quality, noting, 15

Keratoconus, 176

 

Imbert–Fick Law, 107–108

Keratometer, 55

 

Indirect ophthalmoscopy, 127–134

Keratoscopes, 175

 

comparison of hand-held lenses, 129

Kinetic perimetry, 148–149

 

headborne binocular, 132–133

Koeppe nodules, 71

 

modified (monocular), 133–134

KP see Keratic precipitates

 

slit-lamp binocular, 127–132

Krukenberg’s spindle, 66, 67, 99

 

advantages, 131–132

L

 

disadvantages, 131–132

 

examination technique, 128–131

Lacrimal drainage system blockage, 54

 

lenses and modifications, 128

Lanthony test, 27

 

Internal carotid aneurysm, 158

Laser interference, biometry, 90

 

Intraocular pressure (IOP)

Laser therapy, 32

 

and glaucoma, 98, 104–105

Lattice degeneration, 66

 

measurement see Tonometry

Lens

 

and ocular disease, 98, 104–105

capsular opacities, 74

 

physiological variables of, 100–104

cortical opacities, 74

 

accommodation, 100–101

examination, 73–76

 

age, 101

layers, 36–38, 74

 

blinking, 101

subcapsular opacities, 75