Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Eye, Retina, and Visual System of the Mouse_Chalupa, Williams_2008
.pdfblocking BDNF expression in the retina during this window of enhanced expression by means of antisense oligonucleotides counteracts the precocious development of retinal acuity in EE animals (figure 37.4C1 and C2; Landi et al., 2007b). EE, acting through BDNF, also has a strong effect on the developmental segregation of RGC dendrites into the ON and OFF sublaminae, crucial for the emergence of the ON and OFF pathways: in EE rats, RGC dendrite segregation is accelerated and the effects of DR on this process are prevented. Blocking retinal BDNF by means of antisense oligonucleotides blocks EE effects (Landi et al., 2007b).
Since visual development is strongly affected by manipulations occurring before eye opening and in the absence of visual input, provided that adequate levels of critical molecular factors are available to the developing circuitries, then, pushing the reasoning to the extreme, it should also be possible to manipulate the system during very early stages of maturation, in the prenatal life.
Maternal influence on offspring development occurs not only in the form of maternal care provided to pups during the first postnatal weeks but also in the form of supplying of nutrients, hormones, and respiratory gases to the fetus during pregnancy, through placental exchanges (for a review, see Anthony et al., 1995). The extent to which different environmental conditions experienced by the mother affect fetal development is still debated. Most experimental evidence is concerned with the deleterious effects of prenatal stress on fetal development, which include delayed somatic growth (Barlow et al., 1978, Benesova and Pavlik, 1989), delayed motor development (Gramsbergen and Mulder, 1998), and cognitive and behavioral abnormalities (Shiota and Kayamura, 1989; Schneider, 1992; Poltyrev et al., 1996; Lordi et al., 1997; Weinstock, 1997; Szuran et al., 2000; Kofman, 2002), which also occur in humans (Kofman, 2002; Mulder et al. 2002). Some of these effects on offspring development can be rescued by putting stressed mother and the pups into an EE just after delivery (Koo et al., 2003). Very little is known, on the other hand, regarding the possible beneficial effects on embryonic development that might be derived from maternal exposure to increased social and sensorimotor activities. Recent data show that the environment has a strong influence on the developing visual system during fetal life. Maternal EE extended for the entirety of the pregnancy results in a marked acceleration of retinal anatomical development in the rat embryos, with faster dynamics of programmed cell death in RGCs (Sale et al., 2007a). These effects are under the control of IGF-I: its levels, higher in EE pregnant rats and in their milk, are increased as well in the retina of embryos. Neutralization of IGF-I abolishes the action of maternal enrichment on retinal development, and chronic IGF-I injection given to non-EE dams mimics the effects of EE in the fetuses (Sale et al., 2007a).
Taken together, the results of various studies point to at least three distinct temporal phases during pup development that are controlled by the richness of the environment, through different mechanisms (figure 37.5 and color plate 30). In the first phase, maternal enrichment during pregnancy may affect the expression of factors such as IGF-I in the offspring, determining a faster development. An example is the increased IGF-I expression in the RGC layer, which results in an accelerated completion of the process of natural RGC death.
In the second phase, enhanced maternal care levels in EE rats trigger a precocious maturation of retinal acuity and visual cortical functions in the offspring, providing the developing subject with a robust tactile stimulation that could be responsible for the higher levels of IGF-I and BDNF in both the RGC layer and the visual cortex. Precocious expression of BDNF then leads to a precocious development of intracortical inhibition (Huang et al., 1999); in the retina, the precocious increase in BDNF in EE pups is necessary for the accelerated retinal development caused by EE (Landi et al., 2007b).
Finally, in the third phase, when pups begin to actively explore their surroundings, the complex sensorimotor stimulation provided by EE may directly influence their visual system development through IGF-I and possibly BDNF, and the maturation of perineural nets and intracortical inhibition, further accelerating the maturation of visual acuity, determining a faster closure of the critical period for OD plasticity, and preventing DR effects.
The changes documented for these three phases occur sequentially, but it is conceivable they are causally linked. In other words, each phase might act as a trigger for the successive ones. An example is the triggering effect of exposure to EE up to P10 on retinal acuity development (Landi et al., 2007b). It may also be possible that acceleration of developmental CRE-mediated gene expression in the visual cortex might be triggered by the early increase in BDNF expression, although a direct effect of pup exploratory activity is also likely, given the well-known effects of EE exposure on the CREB pathway and on other plasticity genes impinging on it (Molteni et al., 2002).
The effects of EE on visual cortical plasticity are not limited to the developmental period but seem to be present in the adult as well. Recent data show that exposing adult rats to EE strongly increases visual cortical plasticity to the point that it favors recovery from visual pathologies, such as amblyopia. Amblyopia is characterized by a loss of visual acuity in the eye deprived during the critical period. In all species tested so far, recovery from amblyopia is very limited in the adult because of the decline in visual cortical plasticity that occurs with critical period closure. EE control on adult visual cortical plasticity is achieved by modulating critical period determinants such as the intracortical inhibitory
458 development and plasticity of retinal projections and visuotopic maps
EE and visual system development: A three-phase interpretive model
I) Prenatal maternal influence (embryonic life) 
Placental exchanges
Possible factors: IGF-I
Observed changes: increased IGF-I levels in the RGC layer Accelerated dynamics of natural RGCs’ death
II) Postnatal maternal influence
(birth-weaning)
Increased maternal care levels
Possible factors: IGF-I, BDNF and Inhibitory system development
Observed changes: increased cortical BDNF and GAD
expression; increased retinal IGF-I and BDNF expression; accelerated RGC dendritic stratification; trigger for later events (accelerated development of retinal acuity, partial acceleration of visual acuity development)
III) Direct environmental influence (weaning-adult age)
Enhanced sensory-motor stimulation
Possible factors: IGF-I, BDNF, PNN and inhibitory system
Observed changes: increased cortical IGF-I expression; prevention of dark rearing effects;
precious closure of the CP for OD plasticity; acceleration of visual acuity development; increase of adult visual cortical plasticity
Figure 37.5 Model of environmental enrichment effects on visual system development and plasticity. Shown is an interpretive framework for understanding the data on EE influence on the developing visual system. The effects elicited by EE on visual system development and plasticity are due not only to changes in the levels of sensory visual stimulation but also to very early factors activated even in the absence of vision. The available data support a model in which three distinct temporal phases during pup development are differently controlled by the richness of the environ-
system, extracellular matrix components, and BDNF (Sale et al., 2007b).
Conclusion
We began this chapter with the statement that each individual is the result of interactions between genes and the environment. Given the nature of the stimulation provided by EE, we think it unlikely that its effects are limited to visual system development. Rather, we think that EE effects on developmental visual cortical plasticity are indicative of the profound control exerted by the environment on sensory systems and more generally on brain development, a control that up to now has been underestimated.
Among the most surprising results are that environmental conditions start affecting neural circuit development during intrauterine life and that, even if restricted to short time windows in development, they set in motion, through specific factors, events that lead to changes in the maturational
ment: a prenatal phase in which the mother mediates the influence of the environment through placental exchanges with the fetus, an early postnatal phase in which higher levels of maternal care in EE stimulate the expression of experience-dependent factors in the visual system, and a third (and final) phase in which the autonomous interaction of the developing pup with the enriched environment further promotes the maturation of visual functions (see the text for details). See color plate 30.
time course of neural responses that take place weeks later (years later in human terms). This is strongly reminiscent of the longlasting effects of level of maternal care on stress responses in offspring. Maternal care levels appear to be one of the crucial mediators of EE effects on visual system development.
It is good to know that while we are cuddling our infants, in addition to building a love bond we may be contributing to their visual system development.
acknowledgment Work was supported by MIUR COFIN.
REFERENCES
Anthony, R. V., Pratt, S. L., Liang, R., and Holland, M. D. (1995). Placental-fetal hormonal interactions: impact on fetal growth. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1861–1871.
Baldini, S., Sale, A., Baroncelli, L., Putignano, E., Ciucci, F., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2007). Increased tactile stimulation
sale, berardi, and maffei: environmental enrichment and visual system plasticity |
459 |
accelerates visual development in rats. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 346.18. Online.
Barlow, S. M., Knight, A. F., and Sullivan, F. M. (1978). Delay in postnatal growth and development of offspring produced by maternal restraint stress during pregnancy in the rat. Teratology 18:211–218.
Baro, J. A., Lehmkuhle, S., and Kratz, K. E. (1990). Electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in long-term monocularly deprived cats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 31:1405–1409.
Barth, A. L., McKenna, M., Glazewski, S., Hill, P., Impey, S., Storm, D., and Fox, K. (2000). Upregulation of cAMP response element-mediated gene expression during experience-dependent plasticity in adult neocortex. J. Neurosci. 20:4206–4216.
Bartoletti, A., Medini, P., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2004). Environmental enrichment prevents effects of dark-rearing in the rat visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 7:215–216.
Benesova, O., and Pavlik, A. (1989). Perinatal treatment with glucocorticoids and the risk of maldevelopment of the brain.
Neuropharmacology 28:89–97.
Benevento, L. A., Bakkum, B. W., and Cohen, R. S. (1995). gamma-Aminobutyric acid and somatostatin immunoreactivity in the visual cortex of normal and dark-reared rats. Brain Res. 2:172–182.
Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (1999). From visual experience to visual function: Roles of neurotrophins. J. Neurobiol. 41:119– 126.
Berardi, N., Pizzorusso, T., and Maffei, L. (2000). Critical periods during sensory development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10:138– 145.
Berardi, N., Pizzorusso, T., Ratto, G. M., and Maffei, L. (2003). Molecular basis of plasticity in the visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 26:369–378.
Black, J. E., Isaacs, K. R., Anderson, B. J., Alcantara, A. A., and Greenough, W. T. (1990). Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87:5568–5572.
Bonhoeffer, T. (1996). Neurotrophins and activity-dependent development of the neocortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6:119– 126.
Branchi, I., and Alleva, E. (2006). Communal nesting, an early social enrichment, increases the adult anxiety-like response and shapes the role of social context in modulating the emotional behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 172:299–306.
Cancedda, L., Putignano, E., Impey, S., Maffei, L., Ratto, G. M., and Pizzorusso, T. (2003). Patterned vision causes CREmediated gene expression in the visual cortex through PKA and ERK. J. Neurosci. 23:7012–7020.
Cancedda, L., Putignano, E., Sale, A., Viegi, A., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2004). Acceleration of visual system development by environmental enrichment. J. Neurosci. 24:4840– 4848.
Carro, E., Nunez, A., Busiguina, S., and Torres-Aleman, I. (2000). Circulating insulin-like growth factor I mediates effects of exercise on the brain. J. Neurosci. 20:2926–2933.
Carro, E., Trejo, J. L., Busiguina, S., and Torres-Aleman, I. (2001). Circulating insulin-like growth factor I mediates the protective effects of physical exercise against brain insults of different etiology and anatomy. J. Neurosci. 21:5678–5684.
Cellerino, A., and Maffei, L. (1996). The action of neurotrophins in the development and plasticity of the visual cortex. Prog. Neurobiol. 49:53–71.
Ciucci, F., Putignano, E., Baroncelli, L., Landi, S., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2007). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) medi-
ates the effects of enriched environment (EE) on visual cortical development. PLoS ONE 2(5):e475.
Cynader, M., and Mitchell, D. E. (1980). Prolonged sensitivity to monocular deprivation in dark-reared cats. J. Neurophysiol. 43:1026–1040.
Diamond, M. C. (1988). Enriching heredity. New York: Free Press. Diamond, M. C. (2001). Response of the brain to enrichment. An.
Acad. Bras. Cienc. 73:211–220.
Diamond, M. C., Krech, D., and Rosenzweig, M. R. (1964). The effects of an enriched environment on the histology of the rat cerebral cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 123:111–120.
Diamond, M. C., Law, F., Rhodes, H., Lindner, B., Rosenzweig, M. R., Krech, D., and Bennett, E. L. (1966). Increases in cortical depth and glia numbers in rats subjected to enriched environment. J. Comp. Neurol. 128:117–126.
Escorihuela, R. M., Fernandez-Teruel, A., Tobena, A., Vivas, N. M., Marmol, F., Badia, A., and Dierssen, M. (1995). Early environmental stimulation produces long-lasting changes on beta-adrenoceptor transduction system. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 64:49–57.
Fagiolini, M., Pizzorusso, T., Berardi, N., Domenici, L., and Maffei, L. (1994). Functional postnatal development of the rat primary visual cortex and the role of visual experience: Dark rearing and monocular deprivation. Vision Res. 34:709– 720.
Falkenberg, T., Mohammed, A. K., Henriksson, B., Persson, H., Winblad, B., and Lindefors, N. (1992). Increased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in rat hippocampus is associated with improved spatial memory and enriched environment. Neurosci. Lett. 138:153–156.
Fine, I., Wade, A. R., Brewer, A. A., May, M. G., Goodman, D. F., Boynton, G. M., Wandell, B. A., and MacLeod, D. I. (2003). Long-term deprivation affects visual perception and cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 6:915–916.
Fleming, A. S., O’Day, D. H., and Kraemer, G. W. (1999). Neurobiology of mother-infant interactions: Experience and central nervous system plasticity across development and generations.
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 23:673–685.
Francis, D. D., and Meaney, M. J. (1999). Maternal care and the development of stress responses. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9:128– 134.
Frolich, L., Blum-Degen, D., Bernstein, H. G., Engelsberger, S., Humrich, J., Laufer, S., Muschner, D., Thalheimer, A., Turk, A., Hoyer, S., et al. (1998). Brain insulin and insulin receptors in aging and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 105:423–438.
Gianfranceschi, L., Siciliano, R., Walls, J., Morales, B., Kirkwood, A., Huang, Z. J., Tonegawa, S., and Maffei, L. (2003). Visual cortex is rescued from the effects of dark rearing by overexpression of BDNF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:12486– 12491.
Globus, A., Rosenzweig, M. R., Bennett, E. L., and Diamond, M. C. (1973). Effects of differential experience on dendritic spine counts in rat cerebral cortex. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 82:175– 181.
Gramsbergen, A., and Mulder, E. J. (1998). The influence of betamethasone and dexamethasone on motor development in young rats. Pediatr. Res. 44:105–110.
Greenough, W. T., Volkmar, F. R., and Juraska, J. M. (1973). Effects of rearing complexity on dendritic branching in frontolateral and temporal cortex of the rat. Exp. Neurol. 41:371–378.
Hensch, T. K. (2005). Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6:877–888.
460 development and plasticity of retinal projections and visuotopic maps
Hofer, M. A. (1984). Relationships as regulators: A psychobiologic perspective on bereavement. Psychosom. Med. 46:183–197.
Holloway, R. L., Jr. (1966). Dendritic branching: Some preliminary results of training and complexity in rat visual cortex. Brain Res. 2:393–396.
Huang, Z. J., Kirkwood, A., Pizzorusso, T., Porciatti, V., Morales, B., Bear, M. F., Maffei, L., and Tonegawa, S. (1999). BDNF regulates the maturation of inhibition and the critical period of plasticity in mouse visual cortex. Cell 98:739– 755.
Impey, S., Mark, M., Villacres, E. C., Poser, S., Chavkin, C., and Storm, D. R. (1996). Induction of CRE-mediated gene expression by stimuli that generate long-lasting LTP in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Neuron 16:973–982.
Kato, H., Araki, T., Chen, T., Itoyama, Y., and Kogure, K. (1998). Effect of rolipram on age-related changes in cyclic AMPselective phosphodiesterase in the rat brain: an autoradiographic study. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 20:403–408.
Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., and Gage, F. H. (1997). More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature 386:493–495.
Keshet, I., Yisraeli, J., and Cedar, H. (1985). Effect of regional DNA methylation on gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:2560–2564.
Keyvani, K., Sachser, N., Witte, O. W., and Paulus, W. (2004). Gene expression profiling in the intact and injured brain following environmental enrichment. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 63: 598–609.
Kirkwood, A., Lee, H. K., and Bear, M. F. (1995). Co-regulation of long-term potentiation and experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in visual cortex by age and experience. Nature 375: 328–331.
Kofman, O. (2002). The role of prenatal stress in the etiology of developmental behavioral disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26: 457–470.
Kolb, B. (1995). Brain plasticity and behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kolb, B., and Gibb, R. (2001). Early brain injuries, plasticity and behavior. In C. A. Nelson and M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 175–190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koo, J. W., Park, C. H., Choi, S. H., Kim, N. J., Kim, H. S., Choe, J. C., and Suh, Y. H. (2003). The postnatal environment can counteract prenatal effects on cognitive ability, cell proliferation, and synaptic protein expression. FASEB J. 17:1556– 1558.
Koopmans, G. C., Brans, M., Gomez-Pinilla, F., Duis, S., Gispen, W. H., Torres-Aleman, I., Joosten, E. A., and Hamers, F. P. (2006). Circulating insulin-like growth factor I and functional recovery from spinal cord injury under enriched housing conditions. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23:1035–1046.
Krubitzer, L., and Kahn, D. M. (2003). Nature versus nurture revisited: An old idea with a new twist. Prog. Neurobiol. 70: 33–52.
Lander, C., Kind, P., Maleski, M., and Hockfield, S. (1997). A family of activity-dependent neuronal cell-surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in cat visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 17: 1928–1939.
Landi, S., Cenni, M. C., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2007a). Environmental enrichment effects on development of retinal ganglion cell dendrite stratification requires retinal BDNF. Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Atlanta, GA: Society for Neuroscience. Online.
Landi, S., Sale, A., Berardi, N., Viegi, A., Maffei, L., and Cenni, M. C. (2007). Retinal functional development is sensitive to environmental enrichment: a role for BDNF. FASEB J. 21(1):130–139.
Liu, D., Diorio, J., Day, J. C., Francis, D. D., and Meaney, M. J. (2000). Maternal care, hippocampal synaptogenesis and cognitive development in rats. Nat. Neurosci. 3:799–806.
Liu, D., Diorio, J., Tannenbaum, B., Caldji, C., Francis, D., Freedman, A., Sharma, S., Pearson, D., Plotsky, P. M., and Meaney, M. J. (1997). Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. Science 277:1659–1662.
Lordi, B., Protais, P., Mellier, D., and Caston, J. (1997). Acute stress in pregnant rats: effects on growth rate, learning, and memory capabilities of the offspring. Physiol. Behav. 62:1087– 1092.
Maffei, L., and Fiorentini, A. (1981). Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science 211:953–955.
Medini, P., Bartoletti, A., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2008). [Effects of EE on visual cortical development and plasticity.] Unpublished data.
Mollgaard, K., Diamond, M. C., Bennett, E. L., Rosenzweig, M. R., and Lindner, B. (1971). Quantitative synaptic changes with differential experience in rat brain. Int. J. Neurosci. 2: 113–127.
Molteni, R., Ying, Z., and Gomez-Pinilla, F. (2002). Differential effects of acute and chronic exercise on plasticity-related genes in the rat hippocampus revealed by microarray. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16:1107–1116.
Moser, M. B., Trommald, M., Egeland, T., and Andersen, P. (1997). Spatial training in a complex environment and isolation alter the spine distribution differently in rat CA1 pyramidal cells.
J. Comp. Neurol. 380:373–381.
Mower, G. D. (1991). The effect of dark rearing on the time course of the critical period in cat visual cortex. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 58:151–158.
Mower, A. F., Liao, D. S., Nestler, E. J., Neve, R. L., and Ramoa, A. S. (2002). cAMP/Ca2+ response element-binding protein function is essential for ocular dominance plasticity. J. Neurosci. 22:2237–2245.
Mulder, E. J., Robles de Medina, P. G., Huizink, A. C., Van den
Bergh, B. R., Buitelaar, J. K., and Visser, G. H. (2002). Prenatal maternal stress: Effects on pregnancy and the (unborn) child. Early Hum. Dev. 70:3–14.
Naka, F., Shiga, T., Yaguchi, M., and Okado, N. (2002). An enriched environment increases noradrenaline concentration in the mouse brain. Brain Res. 924:124–126.
Nakagawa, S., Kim, J. E., Lee, R., Malberg, J. E., Chen, J., Steffen, C., Zhang, Y. J., Nestler, E. J., and Duman, R. S. (2002). Regulation of neurogenesis in adult mouse hippocampus by cAMP and the cAMP response element-binding protein. J. Neurosci. 22:3673–3682.
Pacteau, C., Einon, D., and Sinden, J. (1989). Early rearing environment and dorsal hippocampal ibotenic acid lesions: Longterm influences on spatial learning and alternation in the rat.
Behav. Brain Res. 34:79–96.
Pascual, R., and Figueroa, H. (1996). Effects of preweaning sensorimotor stimulation on behavioral and neuronal development in motor and visual cortex of the rat. Biol. Neonate 69:399– 404.
Pauk, J., Kuhn, C. M., Field, T. M., and Schanberg, S. M. (1986). Positive effects of tactile versus kinesthetic or vestibular stimula-
sale, berardi, and maffei: environmental enrichment and visual system plasticity |
461 |
tion on neuroendocrine and ODC activity in maternally-deprived rat pups. Life Sci. 39:2081–2087.
Paylor, R., Morrison, S. K., Rudy, J. W., Waltrip, L. T., and Wehner, J. M. (1992). Brief exposure to an enriched environment improves performance on the Morris water task and increases hippocampal cytosolic protein kinase C activity in young rats. Behav. Brain Res. 52:49–59.
Pham, T. A., Impey, S., Storm, D. R., and Stryker, M. P. (1999). CRE-mediated gene transcription in neocortical neuronal plasticity during the developmental critical period. Neuron 22:63– 72.
Pham, T. M. Winblad, B., Granholm, A. C., and Mohammed, A. H. (2002). Environmental influences on brain neurotrophins in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73:167–175.
Pizzorusso, T., Medini, P., Berardi, N., Chierzi, S., Fawcett, J. W., and Maffei, L. (2002). Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science 298:1248–1251.
Pizzorusso, T., Medini, P., Landi, S., Baldini, S., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2006). Structural and functional recovery from early monocular deprivation in adult rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103:8517–8522.
Poltyrev, T., Keshet, G. I., Kay, G., and Weinstock, M. (1996). Role of experimental conditions in determining differences in exploratory behavior of prenatally stressed rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 29:453–462.
Rampon, C., Jiang, C. H., Dong, H., Tang, Y. P., Lockhart, D. J., Schultz, P. G., Tsien, J. Z., and Hu, Y. (2000a). Effects of environmental enrichment on gene expression in the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:12880–12884.
Rampon, C., Tang, Y. P., Goodhouse, J., Shimizu, E., Kyin, M., and Tsien, J. Z. (2000b). Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CA1 NMDAR1knockout mice. Nat. Neurosci. 3:238–244.
Rasmuson, S., Olsson, T., Henriksson, B. G., Kelly, P. A., Holmes, M. C., Seckl, J. R., and Mohammed, A. H. (1998). Environmental enrichment selectively increases 5-HT1A receptor mRNA expression and binding in the rat hippocampus.
Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 53:285–290.
Razin, A. (1998). CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing: A three-way connection. EMBO J. 17:4905– 4908.
Renner, M. J., and Rosenzweig, M. R. (1987). Enriched and impoverished environments. Effects on brain and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rittenhouse, C. D., Shouval, H. Z., Paradiso, M. A., and Bear, M. F. (1999). Monocular deprivation induces homosynaptic long-term depression in visual cortex. Nature 397:347– 350.
Ronca, A. E., Lamkin, C. A., and Alberts, J. R. (1993). Maternal contributions to sensory experience in the fetal and newborn rat (Rattus norvegicus). J. Comp. Psychol. 107:61–74.
Rosenzweig, M. R. (1966). Environmental complexity, cerebral change, and behavior. Am. Psychol. 21:321–332.
Rosenzweig, M. R., and Bennett, E. L. (1969). Effects of differential environments on brain weights and enzyme activities in gerbils, rats, and mice. Dev. Psychobiol. 2:87–95.
Rosenzweig, M. R., and Bennett, E. L. (1996). Psychobiology of plasticity: Effects of training and experience on brain and behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 78:57–65.
Rosenzweig, M. R., Bennett, E. L., and Diamond, M. C. (1967). Effects of differential environments on brain anatomy and brain chemistry. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathology Association 56:45–56.
Rosenzweig, M. R., Bennett, E. L., Hebert, M., and Morimoto, H. (1978). Social grouping cannot account for cerebral effects of enriched environments. Brain Res. 153:563–576.
Rosenzweig, M. R., Bennett, E. L., and Krech, D. (1964). Cerebral effects of environmental complexity and training among adult rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 57:438–439.
Rosenzweig, M. R., Krech, D., Bennett, E. L., and Diamond, M. C. (1962). Effects of environmental complexity and training on brain chemistry and anatomy: a replication and extension.
J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55:429–437.
Sale, A., Cenni, M. C., Ciucci, F., Putignano, E., Chierzi, S., and Maffei, L. (2007a). Maternal enrichment during pregnancy accelerates retinal development of the fetus. PLoS ONE 2(11): e1160.
Sale, A., Maya Vetencourt, J. F., Medini, P., Cenni, M. C., Baroncelli, L., De Pasquale, R., and Maffei, L. (2007b). Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nat. Neurosci. 10:679–681.
Sale, A., Putignano, E., Cancedda, L., Landi, S., Cirulli, F., Berardi, N., and Maffei, L. (2004). Enriched environment and acceleration of visual system development. Neuropharmacology 47:649–660.
Schneider, M. L. (1992). Prenatal stress exposure alters postnatal behavioral expression under conditions of novelty challenge in rhesus monkey infants. Dev. Psychobiol. 25:529–540.
Shiota, K., and Kayamura, T. (1989). Effects of prenatal heat stress on postnatal growth, behavior and learning capacity in mice. Biol. Neonate 56:6–14.
Szuran, T. F., Pliska, V., Pokorny, J., and Welzl, H. (2000). Prenatal stress in rats: Effects on plasma corticosterone, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and maze performance. Physiol. Behav. 71:353–362.
Tees, R. C. (1999). The influences of rearing environment and neonatal choline dietary supplementation on spatial learning and memory in adult rats. Behav. Brain Res. 105:173–188.
Tees, R. C., Buhrmann, K., and Hanley, J. (1990). The effect of early experience on water maze spatial learning and memory in rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 23:427–439.
Thoenen, H. (2000). Neurotrophins and activity-dependent plasticity. Prog. Brain Res. 128:183–191.
Thoenen, H., and Sendtner, M. (2002). Neurotrophins: From enthusiastic expectations through sobering experiences to rational therapeutic approaches. Nat. Neurosci. 5(Suppl.):1046– 1050.
Tian, N., and Copenhagen, D. R. (2001). Visual deprivation alters development of synaptic function in inner retina after eye opening. Neuron 32:439–449.
Tian, N., and Copenhagen, D. R. (2003). Visual stimulation is required for refinement of ON and OFF pathways in postnatal retina. Neuron 39:85–96.
Tohda, M., Murayama, T., Nogiri, S., and Nomura, Y. (1996). Influence of aging on rolipram-sensitive phosphodiesterase activity and [3H]rolipram binding in the rat brain. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 19:300–302.
Torasdotter, M., Metsis, M., Henriksson, B. G., Winblad, B., and Mohammed, A. H. (1996). Expression of neurotrophin-3 mRNA in the rat visual cortex and hippocampus is influenced by environmental conditions. Neurosci. Lett. 218:107–110.
Torasdotter, M., Metsis, M., Henriksson, B. G., Winblad, B., and Mohammed, A. H. (1998). Environmental enrichment results in higher levels of nerve growth factor mRNA in the rat visual cortex and hippocampus. Behav. Brain Res. 93:83–90.
462 development and plasticity of retinal projections and visuotopic maps
Tropea, D., Kreiman, G., Lyckman, A., Mukherjee, S., Yu, H., Horng, S., and Sur, M. (2006). Gene expression changes and molecular pathways mediating activity-dependent plasticity in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 5:660–668.
Turner, A. M., and Greenough, W. T. (1985). Differential rearing effects on rat visual cortex synapses. I. Synaptic and neuronal density and synapses per neuron. Brain Res. 329:195– 203.
van Praag, H., Christie, B. R., Sejnowski, T. J., and Gage, F. H. (1999). Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 13427–13431.
van Praag, H., Kempermann, G., and Gage, F. H. (2000). Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1:191–198.
Venable, N., Fernandez, V., Diaz, E., and Pinto-Hamuy, T. (1989). Effects of preweaning environmental enrichment on basilar dendrites of pyramidal neurons in occipital cortex: A Golgi study. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 49:140–144.
Wang, S., Bartolome, J. V., and Schanberg, S. M. (1996). Neonatal deprivation of maternal touch may suppress ornithine
decarboxylase via downregulation of the proto-oncogenes c-myc and max. J. Neurosci. 16:836–842.
Weaver, I. C., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A., D’Alessio, A. C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J. R., Dymov, S., Szyf, M., and Meaney, M. J. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior.
Nat. Neurosci. 7:847–854.
Weinstock, M. (1997). Does prenatal stress impair coping and regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21:1–10.
Wiesel, T. N. (1982). Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment. Nature 299:583–591.
Williams, B. M., Luo, Y., Ward, C., Redd, K., Gibson, R., Kuczaj, S. A., and McCoy, J. G. (2001). Environmental enrichment: Effects on spatial memory and hippocampal CREB immunoreactivity. Physiol. Behav. 73:649–658.
Winocur, G. (1998). Environmental influences on cognitive decline in aged rats. Neurobiol. Aging 19:589–597.
Young, D., Lawlor, P. A., Leone, P., Dragunow, M., and During, M. J. (1999). Environmental enrichment inhibits spontaneous apoptosis, prevents seizures and is neuroprotective. Nat. Med. 5:448–453.
sale, berardi, and maffei: environmental enrichment and visual system plasticity |
463 |
38 Bidirectional Experience-Dependent
Plasticity in Primary
Visual Cortex
MIKHAIL Y. FRENKEL AND MARK F. BEAR
The response properties of neurons in the visual cortex can be persistently modified following changes in the visual environment. Such modifications reflect changes in synaptic transmission that shape neuronal circuits and presumably store information. A leading model to study experiencedependent plasticity is the deprivation-induced ocular dominance (OD) shift observed early in postnatal development. Pioneering research by Hübel and Wiesel more than four decades ago demonstrated that if one eye was deprived of vision early in a kitten’s life, a dramatic shift in cell responsiveness occurred. The majority of neurons in the primary visual cortex no longer responded to stimuli presented to the deprived eye; these cells were driven by the open eye only (Wiesel and Hübel, 1963). However, in contrast to the profound effects observed in young animals, monocular deprivation (MD) in adult cats had virtually no effect (Hübel and Wiesel, 1970). Thus emerged the notion of a critical period for experience-dependent plasticity—a period of heightened brain plasticity during which experience could produce permanent, large-scale changes in neuronal circuits.
The significance of understanding the synaptic and molecular bases of OD plasticity cannot be overstated. First, although the depth of insight has increased sharply over the past decade with important discoveries about how synaptic transmission and plasticity are mediated in the cerebral cortex, we remain largely ignorant about the molecular basis of OD plasticity, despite more than 40 years of research. Second, the processes revealed by OD plasticity are likely to be the same as those that refine cortical circuitry in response to the qualities of sensory experience during development, and thus determine the capabilities of and limitations to visual performance in adults. Third, rapid OD plasticity is an example of cortical receptive field (RF) plasticity, the most common cellular correlate of memory in the brain. It is therefore likely that understanding the mechanisms of OD plasticity will yield insight into the molecular basis of learning and memory. Fourth, a detailed understanding of how synaptic connections are weakened by sensory deprivation may lead to strategies to reverse such changes, and possibly
overcome amblyopia. Finally, a detailed understanding of how synaptic connections are strengthened by experience is expected to lead to strategies to augment such changes and promote recovery of function after brain injury.
The phenomenon of OD plasticity has been studied in great detail in cats and primates. However, it may be a common feature among sighted mammals, as MD has been shown to alter the binocularity of visual cortical neurons in a number of diverse species (Dräger, 1978; Emerson et al., 1982; Issa et al., 1999; Maffei et al., 1992; Van Sluyters and Stewart, 1974). In many respects, mouse visual cortex is ideal for the mechanistic dissection of OD plasticity. First, mice display rapid and robust OD plasticity in response to MD. The kinetics and behavioral consequences of OD plasticity are very similar to those observed in other species, such as the cat. Second, the property of binocularity is established early in cortical processing by the convergence of thalamic inputs onto layer 4 neurons (there are no, or very few, neurons in mouse visual cortex that are activated exclusively by the ipsilateral eye), potentially simplifying analysis of the underlying synaptic changes. Third, mice are genetically homogeneous, easily obtained, and relatively inexpensive, enabling rapid progress using coordinated biochemical and electrophysiological studies in vitro and in vivo. Fourth, the absence of a columnar organization and other cortical anisotropy makes feasible extended duration recordings in awake animals. Fifth, genes can be delivered or deleted in mouse visual cortex by pronuclear injection, targeted insertion into embryonic stem cells, or viral infection. Finally, mice have emerged as valuable genetic models of human developmental disorders (e.g., fragile X syndrome), offering the opportunity to use the powerful paradigm of OD plasticity to understand how experience-dependent cortical development can go awry in genetic disorders and, hopefully, develop targeted treatments for these disorders.
It is worth drawing a distinction between OD plasticity, a phenomenon that appears to be expressed universally in sighted mammals, and OD column plasticity. OD columns, also discovered by Hübel and Wiesel, reflect the segregation
465
of lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) axon terminals into regularly spaced bands or stripes in visual cortex. Although OD columns exist in some carnivores (e.g., cat and ferret) and some primates (e.g., macaque and human), they are not a feature of visual cortex in most mammals. In squirrel monkeys, for example, some individual animals express columns while others lack them or have them only in parts of primary visual cortex (Adams and Horton, 2003). Other species with excellent vision lack columns altogether (Van Hooser et al., 2005), leading some authors to refer to cortical columns as a “structure without a function” (Horton and Adams, 2005). Although the species traditionally used to study OD plasticity—the cat and macaque monkey—do have columns that can rearrange following MD, it is important to recognize that these species diverged very early in mammalian evolution (95 million years ago), 10 million years before the divergence of modern primates and rodents (Murphy et al., 2004). Columns and their modification by experience may arise from very different mechanisms in these divergent species. In any case, the key point is that the absence of columns in mice has no bearing on their value as a model to study the modification of binocular vision as a function of experience.
This chapter reviews recent progress made in the field of mouse visual cortical plasticity. In particular, the effects of changing an animal’s visual environment during the classically defined critical period and beyond are discussed in detail. Emphasis is on the use of an extended duration visually evoked potential (VEP) recording technique and its advantages for studying various forms of cortical plasticity, among them deprivation-induced depression, activitydependent potentiation, and stimulus-selective response potentiation.
Visually evoked potential recording technique
To gain the most from the numerous advantages of using the mouse visual cortex for mechanistic studies, it is necessary to understand the response changes that contribute to OD plasticity in mice. We chose a well-established technique of recording VEPs to monitor population neuronal activity. This technique has been pioneered and successfully used in rodents by Lamberto Maffei’s laboratory (Pizzorusso et al., 1997; Porciatti et al., 1999). VEPs are a form of local field potential (LFP) evoked by a visual stimulus. The magnitude of the cortical LFP reflects the extent and geometry of dendrites in the neocortex. The pyramidal cells with their apical dendrites running parallel to each other and perpendicular to the pial surface form an ideal open field arrangement and contribute maximally to the LFPs. Other cortical neurons that are oriented horizontally contribute to a much lesser degree to the sum of potentials (Logothetis, 2003). For many years, VEP recording has been a powerful tool in clinical
applications such as the estimation of refractive errors, visual acuity, binocular function, and the prognostic assessment of amblyopia (Sherman, 1979). The high correlation between VEPs and visual acuity testing makes VEP recordings a perfect tool for assessing the functional integrity of the visual system (Sokol, 1976).
Averaged over many stimulus presentations, the amplitude of the VEP waveform provides a quantitative measure of cortical input from the deprived versus nondeprived eye. By comparing VEP amplitudes across deprived and nondeprived eyes within a particular experimental group, it is possible to ascertain whether a change in OD is due to a decrease in the deprived-eye response (synaptic weakening) or an increase in the nondeprived-eye response (synaptic strengthening). In the field of visual cortical plasticity, most electrophysiological data have been derived from acute single-unit recordings that represent the ratio of deprivedeye to nondeprived-eye input. As a population signal, the VEP method avoids the problem of sampling bias due to a limited or skewed sample that is inherent in the single-unit approach. Furthermore, VEPs yield a more rapid assessment of OD than single-unit recordings and are potentially a high-throughput method to screen genetic mutants for visual cortical plasticity phenotypes. In addition, VEP recordings allow a comprehensive evaluation of visual system function. VEPs can be used both to obtain a measure of visual capabilities (spatial resolution, contrast threshold, response timing) that have a counterpart in behavioral capabilities (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reaction time) and to probe for information about cortical processing (retinotopy, laminar analysis). The ability to quickly screen numerous aspects of visual system function is critically important in the analysis of visual phenotypes in mutant mice. Finally, the VEP recording technique can be easily adapted to an extended duration recording situation in which the visual responses of a single animal can be followed over time, before and after visual deprivation.
We have developed an extended duration recording preparation in mice to better understand when and how OD is altered by MD. Figure 38.1A shows a mouse placed in a restraint apparatus designed in our laboratory. Perhaps the greatest advantage of the extended duration VEP recording technique is that visual activity can be monitored in the same experimental subjects over a prolonged period of time. There are additional benefits to this approach: (1) extended duration recordings can be made without the confounds of anesthesia, (2) the same animals can serve as their own controls, and (3) both absolute and relative changes in visual responsiveness can be measured.
Because chronic VEP recordings had not been attempted previously in mice, we first analyzed the laminar pattern of cortical activation in awake animals by performing current source density (CSD) analysis to better understand the
466 development and plasticity of retinal projections and visuotopic maps
Figure 38.1 The extended duration VEP recording technique is a reliable method to assess OD plasticity in mice. A, Representation of VEP recording setup. A mouse previously implanted with recording electrodes in Oc1 is placed in a restraint apparatus in front of a computer monitor displaying visual stimuli. Mice are fully awake and alert during all recording sessions. B, Schematic diagram of the mouse visual system. Input from the stronger contralateral eye arrives via the LGN to the monocular and binocular zones of V1, whereas input from the weaker ipsilateral eye projects only to the small binocular zone. C, Current source density profile of VEPs for an adult mouse. Binocular VEP depth profile is shown in the left panel, with the corresponding cortical layers designated by arrowheads. Middle panel shows the CSD profile. Current sinks are nega-
tive-going and shaded black. The color image plot in the right panel is an interpolation of CSD traces. The earliest latency current sink is observed in layer 4, followed by longer latency sinks in layers 2/3 and 5. Cold and warm colors represent current sinks and sources, respectively. D, Typical VEP responses obtained during the three viewing conditions used in all experiments. Each trace is an average of 100 presentations of a reversing (1 Hz) sinusoidal grating. E, VEPs recorded from awake mice are stable over several days. Displayed in the left panel are the average VEP amplitude (n = 6 mice) in response to contralateral eye (blue bars) and ipsilateral eye (yellow bars) stimulation at baseline (day 0) and after 5 days of normal visual experience. Right panel shows the stability of contralateral/ ipsilateral ratios over days. See color plate 31.
frenkel and bear: bidirectional experience-dependent plasticity in v1 |
467 |
