Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Eye on the Bayou New Concepts in Glaucoma, Cataract and Neuro-ophthalmology_Nussdorf_2005.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
10.26 Mб
Скачать

Optic neuritis: What’s hot and what’s not …

19

 

 

Optic neuritis: What’s hot and what’s not…

Andrew G. Lee

H. Stanley Thompson Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinic, Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

Introduction

Optic neuritis (ON) is a common cause of acute visual loss in adults. ON in this manuscript refers to idiopathic or demyelinating optic neuropathy. This paper provides an update on the diagnosis, evaluation and management, treatment and prognosis of ON in adults. Recent clinical trials and new developments in the treatment of multiple sclerosis are emphasized. The ‘typical’ clinical profile for ON is contrasted with the atypical presentations in Table 1.1-11

Table 1. Features of typical versus atypical optic neuritis in adults

Feature

Typical

Atypical features

 

 

 

Onset

Acute

Chronic

Age

Young adult

Older patient

Laterality

Unilateral

Bilateral simultaneous or rapidly sequential

Pain

With eye movement

Painless or pain out of proportion to findings

Optic disc

Retrobulbar (65%)

Severe disc edema

Hemorrhage

Few (if any)

Marked hemorrhages 360 degrees

Exudates

Uncommon

May see macular star figure in neuroretinitis

Uveitis

Rare

Suggests inflammatory disease

Course

Improves

Lack of improvement or progression

 

 

 

This work was supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., N.Y., N.Y., U.S.A.

Address for correspondence: A.G. Lee, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, 200 Hawkins Drive, PFP, Univerisity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. E-mail: andrewlee@uiowa.edu

Eye on the Bayou, New Concepts in Glaucoma, Cataract and Neuro-Ophthalmology, pp. 19–23 Transactions of the 54th Annual Symposium of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology, New Orleans, LA, USA, February 18-20, 2005

edited by Jonathan D. Nussdorf

© 2006 Kugler Publications, The Hague, The Netherlands

20

A.G. Lee

 

 

The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial

The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) was a multicenter, randomized, pla- cebo-controlled clinical trial of oral and intravenous (IV) corticosteroid therapy for ON.1 Patients were aged 18 to 46 years and had an ipsilateral optic neuropathy. Patients were excluded if they had previous ON, prior corticosteroid treatment for ON or MS, or systemic diseases other than MS that might be the cause for ON. There were three treatment arms: 1. IV methylprednisolone 250 mg every six hours for three days followed by oral prednisone (1mg/kg per day for 11 days and a short taper); 2. oral prednisone alone (1 mg/kg per day for 14 days followed by a short oral taper); and 3. oral placebo for 14 days. In the ONTT, all patients had a brain MR scan, serum antinuclear antibody (ANA) for systemic lupus erythematosus, serologic testing for syphilis (e.g., FTA-ABS), and a chest radiograph for sarcoidosis. None of the laboratory testing was helpful in the diagnosis of typical ON. A lumbar puncture in the ONTT was optional but only disclosed changes consistent with demyelinating disease when positive. The ONTT recommendations are that chest radiograph, laboratory tests, and lumbar puncture are unnecessary for typical ON. Brain MR imaging however is a very useful test for ON and provides the strongest prognostic information for MS in patients with ON.12 Fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences may increase the sensitivity for the detection of periventricular white matter lesions on cranial MRI (Fig. 1).13, 14 Orbital imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium in addition to the brain MR may be useful in ON.

Fig. 1. Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) shows multiple periventricular white matter lesions consistent with the clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Optic neuritis: What’s hot and what’s not …

21

 

 

Visual outcome in ONTT

In the ONTT, although IV steroid sped the rate of recovery, all three treatment arms had good final visual acuity and visual field outcomes. Visual acuity at one year was ≥ 20/40 in 95% of the placebo group, 94% of the IV steroid group, and 91% of the oral prednisone group. In the > 10 year analysis, visual acuity was ≥ 20/20 in 74%; from 20/25 to 20/40 in 18%; from 20/40 to 20/200 in 5%; and < 20/200 in only 3%. Recurrent ON in either eye occurred in 35% and was more frequent in MS (P <.001).15

Treatment of optic neuritis

The ONTT conclusions regarding treatment of ON were as follows: 1. High-dose IV followed by oral corticosteroids sped the rate of visual recovery but did not affect final visual outcome; 2. oral prednisone at conventional doses not only did not improve visual outcome but increased the rate of new attacks of ON and they are probably not indicated; and 3. IV followed by oral corticosteroids reduced the rate of clinically definite MS during the first two years although this effect subsided by three years.16-19

What treatments are available for multiple sclerosis?

Ophthalmologists should be aware that several recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of new immunomodulatory treatments for MS. For example, the Controlled High-Risk Subject Avonex® Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study (CHAMPS) was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, clinical trial (n = 383) of IFN beta 1-a (Avonex®). All patients had an acute first attack of a clinical demyelinating event (e.g., optic neuritis, incomplete transverse myelitis, or brainstem or cerebellar syndrome) and MR demyelinating lesions (i.e., > 2 high signal white matter abnormalities on T2-weighted images). All patients received IV methylprednisolone and then were randomized to either weekly intramuscular (IM) IFN beta-1a (n = 193) or placebo (n = 190).20 There was a 44% reduction in the development of clinically definite MS in the treatment group compared to controls. The IFN treated group also had a relative reduction in the volume of brain lesions (p < 0.001); fewer new or enlarging lesions (p < 0.001); and fewer gadoliniumenhancing lesions (p < 0.001) on cranial MR.20

In another study, the Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (ETOMS) trial, 41 (31%) of 131 patients on interferon beta-1a compared with 62 (47%) of 132 on placebo developed clinically definite MS. The authors concluded that early treatment with interferon beta-1a was effective in reducing conversion to MS and in slowing progressive loss of brain tissue on MR in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (e.g., optic neuritis). In other studies, interferon beta-1a and beta 1-b have shown similar effects for the treatment of MS.20-23

Although the risk for MS is lower for patients with a normal initial MR scan after monosymptomatic ON, these patients still have a 16% chance of developing MS at year five. A repeat cranial MR scan (in six months to one year) might be

22

A.G. Lee

 

 

considered in these patients to detect new MR lesions over time. In the long-term follow-up of the ONTT cohort there were 108 patients who had not developed clinically definite MS ten to 14 years after enrollment. At least one T2 white matter lesion (> 3 mm) was seen on follow-up MR scan in 27 (44%) of 61 patients with a normal baseline MRI. On the other hand, new MR lesions (> 3 mm) were present in 26 (74%) of 35 patients with an abnormal baseline MR scan. This suggests that there are patients who present with monosymptomatic ON who have no clinical signs or MR evidence of demyelination after more than ten years of follow up. In this same ONTT cohort there were 127 patients with clinically definite MS. Functional Systems Scale and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were performed and the disability of most patients was mild (65% had EDSS score < 3.0). The degree of disability was unrelated to baseline MR scan findings. The conclusion was that many patients who develop clinically definite MS following ON have a relatively benign course for at least 10 years.24-25 The decision for and the timing of serial MR scans and consideration for MS treatment should therefore be coordinated with a local neurologist on a case by case basis.

Summary

Ophthalmologists evaluating patients with an acute demyelinating attack of ON should be aware of the results of the ONTT. Although typical ON does not require any laboratory testing or a lumbar puncture, atypical cases may require additional testing. An MR scan of the brain should be considered in all cases of ON and the MR scan provides powerful prognostic information regarding MS that should guide decision making for treatment or referral to a neurologist. Although IV steroids speed the rate of visual recovery in ON they do not affect final visual outcome. Oral steroids in conventional doses should probably not be given for typical ON. New therapies with immunomodulatory therapy (e.g., interferon beta therapy) may reduce the rate of MS even after monosymptomatic demyelinating attacks and the ophthalmologist should coordinate the care of these patients on an individualized basis with a neurologist.26-28

References

1.Beck RW, Cleary PA, Anderson MA, et al: A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. N Engl J Med 326:581-588, 1992

2.Beck RW: The optic neuritis treatment trial: Three-year follow-up results. Arch Ophthalmol 113:136-137, 1995

3.Beck RW, Arrington J, Murtagh FR, Cleary PA, Kaufman DI: Brain magnetic resonance imaging in acute optic neuritis experience of the optic neuritis study group. Arch Neurol 50:841846, 1993

4.Beck RW, Cleary PA: Recovery from severe visual loss in optic neuritis. Arch Ophthalmol 111:300, 1993

5.Beck RW, Cleary PA: Optic neuritis treatment trial: One year follow-up results. Arch Ophthalmol 111:773-775, 1993

6.Beck RW: Corticosteroid treatment of optic neuritis. Neurology 42:1133-1135, 1992

7.Beck RW, Cleary PA, Trobe JD, et al: The effect of corticosteroids for acute optic neuritis on the subsequent development of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 329:1764-1769, 1993

8.Beck RW, Kupersmith MJ, Cleary PA, Katz B: Fellow eye abnormalities in acute unilateral optic neuritis. Ophthalmology 100:691-698, 1993

9.Beck RW, Trobe J: What we have learned from the optic neuritis treatment trial. Ophthalmology 102:1504-1508, 1995

Optic neuritis: What’s hot and what’s not …

23

 

 

10.Lin D, Lee AG, Golnik K, Eggenberger E, Vaphiades M: Atypical features prompting neuroimaging in acute optic neuropathy in adults. Can J Ophthalmol (in press)

11.Feinstein A, Youl B, Ron M: Acute optic neuritis. Brain 115:1403-1415, 1992

12.Brodsky MC, Beck RW: The changing role of MR imaging in the evaluation of acute optic neuritis. Radiology 192:22-23, 1994

13.Guy JR, Mancuso AA, Quisling R: The role of magnetic resonance imaging in optic neuritis. Ophthalmol Clin No America 7:449-458, 1994

14.Staedt D, Kappos L, Rohrbach E, Heun R, Ratzka: Occurrence of MRI abnormalities in patients with isolated optic neuritis. Eur Neurol 30:305-309, 1990

15.Optic Neuritis Study Group: Visual function more than 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol 137:77-83, 2004

16.Trobe JD: High-dose corticosteroid regimen retards development of multiple sclerosis in optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 112:35-36,1994

17.Trobe JD, Sieving PC, Guire KE, Fendrick AM: The impact of the optic neuritis treatment trial on the practices of ophthalmologists and neurologists. Ophthalmol 106:2047-53, 1999

18.Silberberg DH: Corticosteroids and optic neuritis. N Engl J Med 329:1808-1810, 1993

19.Kaufman DI, Trobe JD, Eggenberger ER, Whitaker JN: Practice parameter: the role of corticosteroids in the management of acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 54:203944, 2000

20.Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, et al: Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:898-904, 2000

21.Paty DW, Li DKB, the UBC MS/MRI Study Group, et al: Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, II: MRI analysis results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 43:662-667, 1993

22.Filippi M, Rovaris M, Inglese M, et al: Interferon beta-1a for brain tissue loss in patients at presentation with syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 23;364:1489-1496, 2004

23.Galetta SL, Markowitz C, Lee AG: Imunomodulatory agents for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review Arch Intern Med 162:2161-2169, 2002

24.Optic Neuritis Study Group: Long-term brain magnetic resonance imaging changes after optic neuritis in patients without clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 61:15381541, 2004

25.Optic Neuritis Study Group: Neurologic impairment 10 years after optic neuritis. Arch Neurol 61:1386-1389, 2004

26.Soderstrom M: Multiple sclerosis: rationale for early treatment. Neurol Sci Suppl 5:S298300, 2003

27.Foroozan R, Buono LM, Savino PJ, Sergott RC: Acute demyelinating optic neuritis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 13:375-380, 2002

28.CHAMPS Study Group: Interferon beta-1a for optic neuritis patients at high risk for multiple sclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol 132:463-471, 2001

24

A.G. Lee