Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Eye Movements A Window on Mind and Brain_Van Gompel_2007
.pdf
Color Plate 5. An example of an incongruent indoor picture (top panel) and an incongruent outdoor picture (bottom panel). (See Figure 1b, Chapter 26, p. 569.)
Color Plate 10. Fixations made by an observer while making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, indicated by yellow circles. Images were taken from a camera mounted on the head, and a composite image mosaic was formed by integrating over different head positions using a method described in Rothkopf and Pelz (2004) et al. (The reconstructed panorama shows artifacts because the translational motion of the subject was not taken into account.) Fixations are shown as yellow circles, with a diameter proportional to fixation duration. The red lines indicate the saccades. Note that almost all fixations fall on task relevant objects. (See Figure 1, Chapter 30, p. 644.)
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
Color Plate 11. View of the virtual work-space as a subject (a) picks up, (b) carries, and (c) places a brick on a conveyor belt. The dot visible in front of the lifted brick is one of the fingers. The cross-hair shows fixation. Adapted from Triesch et al. (2003). (See Figure 5, Chapter 30, p. 652.)
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(e) |
(f) |
Color Plate 12. Scene during a single trial of the One Feature condition when brick color was task relevant. Fingertips are represented as small red spheres. In a single trial, a subject (a) selects a brick based on the pick-up cue, (b) lifts the brick, (c) brings it towards themselves, (d) decides on which conveyor belt the brick belongs based on a put-down cue, (e) guides the brick to the conveyor belt, (f) sets the brick on the belt where the brick is carried off. In other trials, subjects may have used width, height, or stripes for the pick-up or put-down decision. Adapted from Droll et al (2005). (See Figure 6, Chapter 30, p. 654.)
(a) |
(b) |
Color Plate 13. Two possible sorting decisions following a missed feature change. (a) Subjects may sort the brick by the old, pre-change, feature, in which case changes are missed due to a failure to update the new visual information. (b) Subjects may sort also the brick by the new, post-change, feature, in which case changes are missed due to a failure to maintain visual information. When subjects performed blocks of trials using the same feature for the put-down decision, missed changes were most often sorted by the old feature (85%). (See Figure 7, Chapter 30, p. 654.)