- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
372 |
F.F. Behar-Cohen et al. |
Taking into account that endothelial corneal cells do not regenerate and because corneal endothelial cell integrity is responsible for corneal transparency, corneal iontophoresis should only be performed in visually compromised cornea, due to infectious or severe inflammation.
15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
Transscleral iontophoresis has been used to achieve high drug concentrations of antibiotics, antiviral drugs, corticosteroids and fluorescein into the posterior segment of the eye. Many of the designed electrode arrangements for the earliest studies in this area were tubular with a reduced area of contact with the sclera over the pars plana, leading to a very high current density. Small burns over areas where the current was applied were, not unexpectedly, commonly described. Under these conditions, high drug concentrations in the vitreous were observed. However, the mechanism of penetration could be attributed at least in part to facilitated diffusion of the drug through ruptured tissue barriers. Very few of these studies reported complete pharmacokinetics of the target drugs after iontophoresis in the complete range of ocular tissues, which could have contributed to a increased understanding of this method of administration.
In the early 1990s, we began working on novel iontophoresis probes that had larger surfaces of application and were applied on an area that was thought at that time to have lower resistance: the pars plicata. We thought that drugs may penetrate through the sclera and follow anteroposterior and anterior migration and reach ocular tissues without inducing high vitreous levels (Fig. 15.1).
Many probe prototypes were successively made by J.M. Parel at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute for experiments to be performed in different animal model and eye sizes by F. Behar-Cohen (Fig. 15.2). The optimized Coulomb controlled iontophoresis (CCI) is shown in Fig. 15.3. It is 14 mm in inner diameter and 17 mm in outer diameter and covers the whole circumference around the cornea (Fig. 15.3). This technology has been developed by Optis France and is now under clinical development by Eyegate Pharma (USA).
Other technology has been developed by Iomed to perform transscleral iontophoresis. The system is different because the semi-annular reservoir is placed in the cul de sac and covered by the eyelid (Fig. 15.4).
The advancement of MRI technology has provided new opportunities for noninvasive procedures and continuous monitoring of ocular drug-delivery systems with a contrast agent or a compound tagged with a contrast agent. MRI was therefore recently applied to study how drug penetrates an eye after transscleral iontophoresis. The delivery and distribution of the model permeants, manganese ion (Mn2+ and manganese ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid complex (MnEDTA2−) were studied. This method was implemented to study intraocular delivery by iontophoresis compared to subconjunctival injection and passive delivery. The total current and duration of application were 2 and 4 mA (current density 10 and 20 mA/cm2) and 20–60 min, respectively.
15 Ocular Iontophoresis |
373 |
Fig. 15.1 Schematic representation of the potential routes of drug penetration in the ocular globe using an annular transscleral probe. The drug penetrates through the pars plana and migrates along the sclera and the suprachoroidal space. Direct penetration in the vitreous or in the aqueous humor does not seem to occur using low current densities (<10 mA/cm2)
Fig. 15.2 Representation of the different iontophoretic prototypes developed at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (J.M. Parel and F. Behar-Cohen and the team)
MRI studies showed that both anodal and cathodal iontophoresis provided significant enhancement in ocular delivery compared to passive transport in the in vitro and in vivo studies. Transscleral iontophoretic delivery was related to the position and duration of the iontophoresis application in vivo. Permeants were observed to be delivered primarily into the anterior segment of the eye when the pars plana was the application site. Extending the duration of iontophoresis at this site allowed the permeants to be delivered into the vitreous more deeply and to a greater extent than when the application site was at the back of the eye near the fornix.
374 |
F.F. Behar-Cohen et al. |
Fig. 15.3 First Optis transscleral probe used for a clinical trial. (a) Schematic representation of the probe with a tungsten electrode on the bottom and a drug reservoir of 0.5 cm2. (b) The whole system with a syringe to introduce the drug into the reservoir and another tube to extract the fluid in order to create a constant flux during the procedure. The probe and the forehead return electrodes are connected to a generator. (c) Procedure preformed on a patient with topical anesthesia
Fig. 15.4 OcuPhor transscleral probe, developed by Iomed®. (a) Representation of the scleral probe, and (b) placement in the cul de sac of a patient
15 Ocular Iontophoresis |
375 |
This demonstrated that electrode placement was an important factor in transscleral iontophoresis, and the ciliary body (pars plana) was determined to be the pathway of least resistance for iontophoretic transport (Molokhia et al. 2007). Experiments involving constant current transscleral iontophoresis of 2 mA (current density 10 mA/cm2) and subconjunctival injection were conducted with rabbits in vivo and postmortem and with excised sclera in side-by-side diffusion cells in vitro. The postmortem and in vitro experiments were expected to be helpful in clarifying the importance of vascular clearance and other transport barriers in transscleral iontophoresis. Manganese ion (Mn2+) and manganese ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid complex (MnEDTA2−) were the model permeants. The results show that pretreatment of the eye with an electric field by iontophoresis enhanced subconjunctival delivery of the permeants to the anterior segment of the eye in vivo. This suggests that electric field induced barrier alterations can be an important absorption enhancing mechanism of ocular iontophoresis. Penetration enhancement was magnified in the postmortem experiments with larger amounts of the permeants delivered into the eye and to the back of the eye. The different results observed in the in vivo and postmortem studies can be attributed to ocular clearance in ocular delivery and suggest that pharmacokinetic studies performed ex vivo cannot be extrapolated to clinical situations (Molokhia et al. 2008).
15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
Table 15.3 summarizes the principal studies on transscleral delivery of antibiotics. Barza et al. (1986) used a very small probe (1 mm in diameter) placed over the pars plana to deliver gentamycin, ticarcillin and cephazolin to the rabbit vitreous. High concentrations of those drugs were measured in the vitreous after iontophoresis of uninfected rabbits. However because of the high current densities used, burns were commonly observed at the site of iontophoresis. Therefore, the penetration of the drug directly to the vitreous could result, at least in part from direct penetration through disrupted tissues. Transscleral iontophoresis of gentamycin was found to be a useful supplement to intravitreal injection in an experimental endophthalmitis model caused by P. aeruginosa in the rabbit. Higher rates of sterilization were observed in eyes that received both transscleral iontophoresis of gentamycin and intravitreal injections of gentamycin compared to intravitreal injections alone (Barza et al. 1987a, b). In the monkey, therapeutic levels were obtained in the vitreous following transscleral iontophoresis of gentamycin. Electroretinograms were normal in all eyes after iontophoresis but indirect ophthalmoscopy showed localized area of retinal burns in the area of pars plana where the electrode had been placed (Barza et al. 1987a, b). Other studies reported lower antibiotic concentrations in the vitreous but used much lower current densities (Burstein et al. 1985). However, in this study tissue concentrations were not measured. It has been suggested that high and long-lasting concentrations of gentamycin could be obtained in the vitreous without any retinal lesion, by using 2% agar in the 10% gentamycin solution, and performing a transscleral iontophoresis with a 2 mm in diameter probe
Table 15.3 Transscleral iontophoresis of antibiotics
|
Probe diameter |
|
|
Current density |
Duration |
|
|
Concentration |
References |
(mm) |
Drug |
Animal |
(mA/cm2) |
(min) |
Tissue |
Time (h) |
(mg/mL) |
Burstein et al. (1985) |
2.5 |
Gentamycin sulfate |
Rabbit |
10.7 |
3 |
V |
24 |
8.9 |
|
|
(100 mg/mL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barza et al. (1986) |
1 |
Gentamycin sulfate |
Rabbit |
3.33 |
10 |
V |
3 |
<2 |
|
|
(25–50 mg/mL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barza et al. (1987a, b) |
0.5 |
Gentamycin sulfate |
Monkey |
200 |
1 |
V |
24 |
28 |
|
|
(25–50 mg/mL) |
|
|
2 |
V |
24 |
11–44 (burn) |
Barza et al. (1986) |
1 |
Cefazolin sodium |
Rabbit |
27 |
10 |
V |
3 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
67 |
10 |
V |
3 |
119 (burn) |
Barza et al. (1986) |
1 |
Ticarcillin |
Rabbit |
27 |
10 |
V |
3 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
67 |
10 |
V |
3 |
94 (burn) |
Grossman and Lee |
3 |
Ketoconazole |
Rabbit |
14.8 |
15 |
V |
1 |
10.2 < MIC |
(1989) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Choi and Lee (1988) |
3 |
Vancomycin |
Rabbit |
12 |
10 |
V |
2 |
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
3 |
Vollmer et al. (2002) |
|
Amikacin (200 mg/mL) |
Rabbit |
3.7 |
20 |
V |
0.5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AH |
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
V |
0.5 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AH |
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
V |
0.5 |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AH |
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retina |
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376
.al et Cohen-Behar .F.F
15 Ocular Iontophoresis |
377 |
CCI 2mA, 4min, 25% Imipeneme, anodal iontophoresis
Imipeneme [mg/ml]
100
10
1
,1
,01
0,5 |
2 |
6 |
24 |
Time (hours)
AH
V
1g IV (human)
enterococcus klebsiella
proteus
staphaureus haemophylus
pneumo
Fig. 15.5 Vitreous and aqueous humor pharmacokinetics of imipeneme after transscleral iontophoresis in the rabbit in relation to more frequent bacterial sensitivity. Coulomb controlled anodal iontophoresis (CCI) was performed on pigmented rabbits (N = 8 per time points) using 25% imipeneme, 2 mA for 4 min. Concentrations of Imipeneme (mg/mL) in the aqueous humor (AH) and in the vitreous (V) were measured at 0.5, 2, 6 and 24 h after application. Sensitivity of different bacteria is represented on the graph
(2 mA for 10 min) treatment (Grossman et al. 1990). Vancomycin, a high molecular weight glycopeptide, was iontophoresed from a 5% drug solution in contact with 25–30 mm2 of the temporal sclera overlaying the pars plana using a 3.5 mA current intensity for 10 min. Bactericidal effective concentrations in the vitreous were observed for about 12 h after a single treatment. This was the first demonstration that a high molecular weight agent could be delivered in the posterior segment of the eye by means of transscleral iontophoresis (Grossman and Lee 1989).
In an extended study, Vollmer et al. (2002) evaluated the amikacin levels in ocular tissues and media 30 min after transscleral iontophoresis using an applicator placed in the superior cul de sac of the rabbit eye. He found that intraocular amikacin levels depend on the current densities but interestingly found that whilst 92.3 mg/mL amikacin was achieved in the retina, the vitreous remained quite low at 5.4 mg/mL 30 min after iontophoresis at 7.4 mA/cm2. This demonstrates that using transscleral delivery, sampling the vitreous may not reflect posterior tissue levels. In this experiment amikacin levels were above the MCI with the highest current density.
We have evaluated the effect of the CCI system shown in Fig. 15.3 to deliver imipeneme and cefatzidime in the pigmented rabbit eye. CCI iontophoresis was performed at 2 mA for 4 min with 25% imipeneme or ceftazidime. Figures 15.5 and 15.6 show the antibiotic concentrations in the aqueous humor, vitreous and
