- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
326 |
A.L. Weiner |
Fig. 13.16 Capsule ring device prototype compared to a penny showing valve assembly with a 27-gauge cannula in the valve access port. Reprinted from Molokhia et al. (2010a, b). Copyright 2010, with permission from Elsevier
13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
Traditionally, the lens capsule has not been thought of as a primary location for delivery devices if other more accessible sites prove successful. The issue of repetitive surgical replacement of devices in this location has historically been a roadblock. Therefore, the concept of being able to refill a one-time implanted capsule device offers greater attractiveness. That being said, the target population that can accommodate a device in this anatomical location may be more limited to cataract patients who require therapy for the IOL surgery itself or who have other concurrent ophthalmic disease. Despite the possible caveats, studies continue to progress on a refillable capsule ring device which has been reported on recently (Molokhia et al. 2009, 2010a, b; Bishop et al. 2010). This device contains two small ports made of polyimide with a polydimethylsiloxane plug acting as a one-way valve (Fig. 13.16). Using noncoring needles, the valve continued to seal and hold 40 mm pressure up to 30 punctures. Prepuncturing the other valve allowed for release of pressure upon fill. The reservoir accommodates up to 80 mL and studies evaluating Avastin® release through the semi-permeable membrane demonstrated zero-order type rates over 2 months.
13.5 Conclusions
It is clear that significant development is still needed to advance various refillable ophthalmic device designs to a commercial level. There appear to be only a limited handful where theoretical designs have actually been reduced to practice, fabricated
13 Refillable Devices for Therapy of Ophthalmic Diseases |
327 |
by an approvable manufacturing process, implanted in preclinical or clinical studies, and evaluated sufficiently to show validated safety or efficacy. What can be said, however, is that the sophistication of the designs and understanding of the necessary engineering to achieve the above goals has advanced greatly. With better comprehension and utilization of available compatible biomaterials, evolution of microand nano-fabrication techniques and application of more minimally invasive design elements, there is great hope for the future that more convenient therapeutic regimens will emerge as a result of new devices offering capabilities to conduct safer refill procedures instead of surgical interventions.
References
Adamis AP, Miller JW, Mescher MJ, Gragoudas ES, Borenstein JT (2004) Transscleral drug delivery device and related methods. Patent Cooperation Treaty International Publication Number WO 2004/073551 A2
Adler N (1964) Use of self-sealing elastomer septums for quantitative operations with volatile solvents. Anal Chem 36(12):2291–2295
Ashton P, Patchell RA, Cooper J, Young BA (1998) Implantable refillable controlled release device to deliver drugs directly to an internal portion of the body. US Patent 5,836,935
Avery RL (2006) Implantable delivery device for administering pharmacological agents to an internal portion of a body. US Patent Application 20060258994 A1
Avery RL, Luttrull JK (1998) Intravitreal medicine delivery. US Patent 5,830,173
Avery RL, Saati S, Journey M, Caffey S, Varma R, Tai Y-C, Humayun MS (2010) A novel implantable refillable pump for intraocular drug delivery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51, ARVO 2010 annual meeting, E-Abs 3799
Bishop CJ, Sant HJ, Molokhia SA, Burr RM, Gale BK, Ambati BK (2010) Designing and manufacturing a refillable multi-drug capsule ring platform. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51, ARVO 2010 annual meeting, E-Abs A259
Buchwald H, Grage TB, Vassilopoulos PP, Rohde TD, Varco RL, Blackshear PJ (1980) Intraarterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatic carcinoma using a totally implantable infusion pump. Cancer 45(5):866–869
Cohen AM, Wood WC, Greenfield A, Waltman A, Dedrick C, Blackshear PJ (1980) Transbrachial hepatic arterial chemotherapy using an implanted infusion pump. Dis Colon Rectum 23(4):223–227 Cohen AM, Greenfield A, Wood WC, Waltman A, Novelline R, Athanasoulis C, Schaeffer NJ (1983a) Treatment of hepatic metastases by transaxillary hepatic artery chemotherapy using an
implanted drug pump. Cancer 51(11):2013–2019
Cohen AM, Kaufman SD, Wood WC, Greenfield AJ (1983b) Regional hepatic chemotherapy using an implantable drug infusion pump. Am J Surg 145(4):529–533
Dahlin DC, Trawick D, Zilliox P, Robertson SM, Sanders M, Struble C, Clark AF (2003) Design of a specialized cannula for posterior juxtascleral delivery of anecortave acetate to the retina for treatment CNV associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 4, E-Abs 5036
Dalton MJ (1989) Matrix septum. US Patent 4,857,053
Dario A, Scamoni C, Picano M, Fortini G, Cuffari S, Tomei G (2005) The infection risk of intrathecal drug infusion pumps after multiple refill procedures. Neuromodulation 8(1):36–39
De Carvalho RAP, Krause ML, Murphree AL, Schmitt EE, Campochiaro PA, Maumenee IH (2006) Delivery from episcleral exoplants. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4532–4539
DeCarvalho RAP, Murphree AL, Schmitt EE (2003) Implantable and sealable system for unidirectional delivery of therapeutic agents to tissues. US Patent Application 2003/0064088 A1 and PCT WO 03/020172
328 |
A.L. Weiner |
DeCarvalho RAP, Krause ML, e Silva RL, Maumenee IH, Campochiaro P (2005) Transscleral diffusion patterns and intraocular tracer kinetics of sealable and refillable episcleral drug delivery systems. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46, E-Abs 3532
Dinius HB, Huizenga JR (1984) Implant system. US Patent 4,451,254
Doan P, Nettecoven WS (1992) Drug administration device over full protection valve. US Patent 5,158,547
Franklin A (2007) Trans-scleral drug delivery method and apparatus. US Patent 7,276,050 B2 Ginggen A (2009) Implantable pump with integrated refill detection. US Patent 7,637,897 B2 Greenberg R (2009) Implantable drug delivery device. US Patent 7,527,621 A1 and US Patent
Application 2002/0188282 A1
Humayan M, De Juan E (2006) Reservoirs with subretinal cannula for subretinal drug delivery. US Patent Publication 2006/0200097 A1
Krause M, e Silva RL, Maumenee IH, Campochiaro P, Schmitt EE, Murphree AL, de Carvalho RAP (2005) Characterization and validation of refillable episcleral drug delivery devices for unidirectional and controlled transscleral drug delivery. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46, E-Abs 499
Levy R (1997) Implanted drug delivery systems for control of pain. Chapter 19. Neurosurgical management of pain. Springer, New York
Levy A (2004) Self resealing elastomeric closure. US Patent 6,752,965 B2
Li P-Y, Shih J, Lo R, Saati S, Agrawal R, Humayun MS, Tai Y-C, Meng E (2008) An electrochemical intraocular drug delivery device. Sens Actuators A 143:41–48
Lim KS, Allan BDS, Lloyd AW, Muir A, Khaw PT (1998) Glaucoma drainage devices; past, present and future. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1083–1089
Liu HS, Refojo MF, Perry HD, Albert DM (1979) Sustained release of BCNU for the treatment of intraocular malignancies in animal models. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:1061–1067
Liu LHS, Refojo MF, Ni C, Ueno N, Albert DM (1983) Sustained release of carmustine (BCNU) for treatment of experimental intraocular malignancy. Br J Ophthalmol 67:479–484
Lo R, Li P-Y, Saati S, Agrawal RN, Humayun MS, Meng E (2009) A passive MEMS drug delivery pump for treatment of ocular diseases. Biomed Microdevices 11:959–970
Meng E, Humayun M, Lo R, Li P-Y, Saati S (2009) Implantable drug-delivery devices and apparatus and methods for refilling the devices. US Patent Application 20090192493
Molokhia SA, Sant HJ, Hanson MC, Burr RM, Poursaid AE, Bishop CJ, Simonis JM, Gale BK, Ambati BK (2009) New intraocular drug delivery device. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50, ARVO 2009 annual meeting, E-Abs A597
Molokhia SA, Sant H, Simonis J, Bishop CJ, Burr RM, Gale BK, Ambati BK (2010a) The capsule drug device: novel approach for drug delivery to the eye. Vis Res 50(7):680–685
Molokhia SA, Burr RM, Sant HJ, Simonis JM, Gale BK, Ambati BK (2010b) In vivo pharmacokinetics of a new intraocular drug delivery device. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51, ARVO 2010 annual meeting, E-Abs A256
Molteno ACB (1969) New implant for drainage in glaucoma. Animal trial. Br J Ophthalmol 53: 161–168
Muller H, Aigner K, Worm I, Lobisch M, Brahler A, Hempelmann G (1984) Long term experiences with continuous peridural opiate analgesia with an implanted pump. Anaesthesist 33(9):433–439 Olsen JM (2000) Overfill protection systems for implantable drug delivery devices. US Patent
6,152,898
Olsen TW, Feng X, Wabner K, Conston SR, Sierra DH, Folden DV, Smith ME, Cameron JD (2006) Cannulation of the suprachoroidal space: a novel drug delivery methodology to the posterior segment. Am J Ophthalmol 142(5):777–787
Pang C, Jiang F, Shih J, Caffey S, Humayun M, Tai Y-C (2010) Drug-delivery pumps and methods of manufacture. US Patent Application 20100004639
Peyman GA (2005) Ocular drug delivery. US Patent Publication 2005/0181018 A1
Phillips TW, Chandler WF, Kindt GW, Ensminger WD, Greenberg HS, Seeger JF, Doan KM, Gyves JW (1982) New implantable continuous administration and bolus dose intracarotid drug delivery system for the treatment of malignant gliomas. Neurosurgery 11(2):213–218
13 Refillable Devices for Therapy of Ophthalmic Diseases |
329 |
Prestele K, Funke H, Moschi R, Reif E, Franetzki M (1983) Development of remotely controlled implantable devices for programmed insulin infusion. Life Support Syst 1(1):23–38
Refojo MF, Liu HS (1981) Method for treating intraocular malignancies. US Patent 4,300,557 Refojo MF, Liu HS, Leong FL, Sidebottom D (1978) Release of a nitrosourea derivative from
refillable silicone rubber implants for the treatment of intraocular malignancies. J Bioeng 2(5):437–445
Renard E, Rostane T, Carriere C, Marchandin H, Jacques-Apostol D, Lauton D, Gibert-Boulet F, Bringer J (2001) Implantable insulin pumps: infections most likely due to seeding from skin flora determine severe outcomes of pump-pocket seromas. Diabetes Metab 27(1):62–65
Roorda WE (2001) Refillable implantable drug delivery pump. US Patent 6,283,949 B1
Saati S, Lo R, Li P-Y, Meng E, Varma R, Humayun MS (2009) Mini drug pump for ophthalmic use. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 107:60–70. Subsequently reviewed, modified and re-published in 2010 Curr Eye Res 35(3):192–201
Sassa R, Dove K, Cooper S (2009) Barrier with low extractables and resealing properties. US Patent Application 20090196798 A1
Selam JL, Slingeneyer A, Chaptal PA, Franetzki M, Prestele K, Mirouze J (1982) Total implantation of a remotely controlled insulin minipumps in a human insulin dependant diabetic. Artif Organs 6(3):315–319
Setabutr P, Bell NP, Feldman RM (2006) Intraoperative management of non-functioning Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Ophthal Surg Lasers Imaging 37:62–64
Slakter JS, Singerman LJ, Yannuzzi LA, Russell SR, Hudson HL, Jerdan J, Zilliox P, Robertson SM (2002) Sub-Tenon’s administration of the angiostatic agent anecortave acetate in AMD patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) – the clinical outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43, E-Abs 2909
Varner SE, DeJuan E Jr, Shelley T, Barnes AC, Cooney MJ, Shelley TH (2002) Reservoir device for intraocular drug delivery. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Publication No WO 02/100318
Varner SE, DeJuan E Jr, Shelley T, Barnes AC, Humayun M (2004) Devices for intraocular drug delivery. US Patent 6,7196750 B2
Watson DA, Shimizu RW, LaPorte R (2005) Implantable refillable and ported controlled release drug delivery device. US Patent 6,852,106 B2
Weiner AL (2007) Drug delivery systems in ophthalmic applications. In: Yorio T, Clark A, Wax M (eds) Ocular therapeutics; eye on new discoveries. Academic, New York, pp 7–43
Weiner AL, Sinnett K, Johnson S (1995) Tack for intraocular drug delivery and method for inserting and removing the same. US Patent 5,466,233
Wong VG, Hu MWL, Berger DE Jr (2001) Controlled-release biocompatible ocular drug delivery implant devices and methods. US Patent 6,331,313 B1
Yaacobi Y (2002) Ophthalmic drug delivery device. US Patent 6,416,777 B1 Yaacobi Y (2006a) Ophthalmic drug delivery device. US Patent 6,986,900 B2 Yaacobi Y (2006b) Ophthalmic drug delivery device. US Patent 7,094,226 B2
Yaacobi Y, Chastain J, Lowseth L, Bhatia R, Slovin E, Rodstrom R, Stevens L, Dahlin D, Marsh D (2003) In-vivo studies with trans-scleral anecortave acetate delivery device designed to treat Choroidal neovascularization in AMD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44, E-Abs 4210
Yamamoto R, Conston SR, Sierra D (2007) Apparatus and formulations for suprachoroidal drug delivery. US Patent Publication 2007/0202186 A1
