- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
278 |
S.A. Durazo and U.B. Kompella |
Dendrimers are generally synthesized by a stepwise addition of finite chemical units. One well-known approach is the orthogonal coupling-strategy approach (Zeng and Zimmerman 1996). This method starts with mixing a compound with two repeating units such as dimethyl 5-hydroxyisophthalate with harsh chemicals such as MeOH, H2SO4, LiAlH4, and Et2O to generate the dendritic core. Once the core has been synthesized, the next unit can be covalently linked to the core to branch out. Stepwise addition of polymer generations can be repeated until the desired amount of generations is completed.
DPTs can be synthesized by a two-step process: the first step is to synthesize the core, which contains three guanidine groups attached to tris-(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (HMAM) (Durairaj and Kompella 2009). The second step is to add units of 3,5-diethoyoxycarbonylbenzoic acid to create as many generations as desired. Lastly, units of guanidine can be added to react with the amine group of (HMAM).
Dendrimers are extremely desirable and useful in ocular drug delivery because their composition and function can be readily controlled. Unlike other methods of nanoparticle synthesis, dendrimer synthesis can be highly controlled and regulated. The functional groups on the surface of the dendrimer may be optimized to allow for enhanced cell permeability, targeting, or drug retention. However, the sustained release from dendrimeric systems may be of a shorter duration compared to solid nanoparticles.
11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
Controlled release or release at a particular site and/or for a particular duration is employed to enhance drug efficacy while minimizing the risk for toxicity. Hoare et al. developed a nanosystem comprised of a liposome with hydrogels embedded in the membrane that act as a pore when Iron(III)oxide particles are magnetically induced (Hoare et al. 2009). Drug release from the liposome is controlled by an “on, off” switch that controls the magnetic induction and therefore the opening and closing of the hydrogels embedded in the membrane. Another possible mechanism may involve light irradiation. This was alluded to in Sect. “Polymer Nanoparticles.” Gold nanoshells which undergo surface plasmon resonance upon laser irradiation and create a local heating effect can also be used as actuators in a drug delivery device (Prevo et al. 2008). Other mechanisms including thermosensitive and enzymatic release may be possible as well.
11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
An introduction to the usefulness of drug delivery systems in ocular therapeutics was discussed in the previous section for polymer, liposomal, protein, carbohydrate, dendrimer nanoparticles as well as drug delivery systems with multiple components.
11 Nanotechnology and Nanoparticles |
279 |
This section will focus on different areas of ocular therapeutic improvement and possible solutions.
11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
A major concern for clinicians prescribing and administering eye injections is patient compliance due to the lack of noninvasive treatments that can deliver adequate amounts of drug to the target site. Currently, there are no treatments available that can deliver macromolecules and small molecules to the posterior segment of the eye efficiently without using invasive techniques (e.g., intravitreal injection).
As the biological basis for many ocular diseases becomes more apparent, protein, peptide, and nucleic acid drugs will be used to develop new pharmaceuticals and therefore there is a need to develop noninvasive approaches for delivering macromolecules as well. For example, the anti-VEGF antibody formulation, Lucentis® must be intravitreally injected to reach the posterior segment of the eye. Many macromolecules have poor permeability across biological barriers, which make the development of noninvasive techniques difficult. Nanotechnology approaches may be used to improve the bioavailability of many macromolecules by sequestering the drug from enzymatic degradation and by enhancing tissue uptake. For instance, surface-functionalized nanoparticle technologies were developed by Kompella et al. to enhance corneal and conjunctival uptake and transport of nanoparticles and the associated therapeutic agents (Kompella et al. 2006). These technologies entail coating of particle surfaces with a ligand capable of recognizing a cell surface receptor. By coating LHRH receptor and transferrin receptor recognizing ligands, it was shown that the corneal and conjunctival uptake as well as transport of nanoparticles can be enhanced by several fold. The functionalized nanoparticle exposure did not alter corneal epithelial cell tight junctions or paracellular permeability, indicating the safety of these nanoparticles. It is anticipated that functionalized nanoparticles will allow noninvasive delivery of poorly permeable small molecules as well as macromolecules to the back of the eye.
11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
Many therapeutics designed to treat ocular diseases must be injected into the eye and typically they are injected multiple times to prevent relapse, e.g., Lucentis® (Valmaggia et al. 2008). It has been reported that complications related to the injection technique can occur, resulting in infection, uvetis, endophthalmitis (Ozkiris and Erkilic 2005), cataract progression (Cekic et al. 2005), and vitreous hemorrhage (Ciardella et al. 2004). The risk for these complications can be
280 |
S.A. Durazo and U.B. Kompella |
decreased by either developing noninvasive topical modes of delivery or by injecting less frequently. In order for treatment injections to be less frequent, the drug must have either intrinsic sustained release properties or a controlled release mechanism may be employed by engineering a drug carrier. Nanosystems or nanoparticles can be designed to have sustained release properties. For example, Bourges et al. designed polylactic acid (PLA) nanoparticles that were injected intravitreally and were observed in RPE cells up to 4 months after injection (Bourges et al. 2003). Compared to Macugen® and Lucentis®, which are injected every 6 weeks and every 4 weeks, PLA nanoparticles are retained much longer. The use of PLA nanoparticles as a drug carrier may prove to be a successful approach to sustain the release of its contents. A reduction in dosing frequency will increase patient compliance, which reduces the risk for many complications associated with ocular injections.
11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
Many topical agents including steroids, antihistamines, prostaglandins, and topical anesthetics have been formulated to provide for noninvasive administration, yet these topical agents still are not able to reach the posterior segment of the eye in sufficient quantity. In eye treatments given as eye droplets such as timolol, only 1% or less of a topically applied dose is absorbed across the cornea to reach the anterior segment of the eye (Lee and Robinson 1986; Mezei and Meisner 1993; Ding 1998) and only about one-billionth of that reaches the vitreous (Maurice 2002). Ocular barriers such as the cornea and conjunctiva also create a major hurdle for topically applied agents (Kompella and Lee 1999; Kompella et al. 2010). Therefore, noninvasive formulations such as eye drops are not only are being washed away by tear drainage and blinking, but they also encounter major ocular barriers that significantly reduce the amount of drug that is able to reach the posterior segment of the eye. Therefore, the major route of administration of ocular therapeutics for the back of the eye is injection because it delivers the drug either directly to the site of action or in close proximity. With the advent of nanotechnology, noninvasive routes of administration may be finally realized for ocular treatments by overcoming the many biological barriers and providing for increased drug retention.
Surface functionalization of nanoparticles is a common approach to enhance the permeability and specific tissue levels of therapeutics. For instance, deslorelin, a luteinizing releasing hormone agonist, and transferrin functionalized polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles (approximately 100 and 85 nm, respectively) enhanced corneal epithelial uptake by 3- and 4.5-fold compared to unfunctionalized nanoparticles, respectively, at 5 min when topically applied to an ex vivo model (Kompella et al. 2006). At 1 h after a single topical application of the nanoparticle solution, the deslorelin and transferrin functionalized nanoparticles had 4.5- and 3.8-fold higher
11 Nanotechnology and Nanoparticles |
281 |
uptake across the corneal epithelium than nonfunctionalized nanoparticles. Functionalized nanoparticles clearly are capable of improving drug transport across major ocular barriers.
11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
Ocular treatments may also be improved by developing targeted nanotherapies that increase drug localization in the target tissues or reduce drug delivery to nontarget tissues associated with drug side effects. Such approaches can potentially increase drug therapeutic index by increasing drug efficacy and/or reducing drug toxicity. Macugen® (pegaptanib), a drug product approved for treating wet AMD, belongs to a class of chemicals known as aptamers (a short strand of nucleotides that recognizes a specific protein sequence) that are known to bind to their targets with affinities superior to even antibodies. Potentially, such aptamers can be used to target delivery systems following various routes of administration. Indeed, aptamers have been designed in the field of cancer therapy to target therapeutics directly to the cancer cells and similar approaches may be used for targeting specific cell types within the eye. Aptamers that specifically recognize the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) found on the surface of prostate cancer cells were ligated to PLA– PEG nanoparticles by adding the nanoparticles to 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3- ethylcarbodimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) for 15 min while stirring (Farokhzad et al. 2004). Then the NHS-activated nanoparticles were covalently linked to the PSMA aptamer. The resulting size of the nanoparticles was approximately 250 nm. An in vitro assay confirmed that nanoparticles with PSMA aptamers had 77-fold higher binding to LNCaP cells (which contain the PSMA membrane protein) than the PC3 cells (which do not contain the PSMA membrane protein).
Further, integrin-targeting peptides with RGD (arginine, glycine, and aspartic acid) sequence and transferrin functionalizations on nanoparticle surface are of potential value in increasing the delivery of nanoparticles and any associated therapeutic agents to various cell types within the eye. Using intravenously administered nanoparticles functionalized on their surface with RGD peptide or transferrin, it was demonstrated that back of the eye delivery of anti-VEGF intraceptor plasmidloaded nanoparticles can be enhanced in a choroidal neovascularization model (Singh et al. 2009). Further, these nanoparticles enhance gene expression efficiency in vascular endothelial cells, photoreceptor outer segments, and retinal pigment epithelial cells. By encapsulating the plasmid inside the nanoparticles as opposed to the anti-VEGF agent itself, this approach potentially minimizes the systemic side effects of anti-VEGF antibodies such as stroke and hypertension. Further, since the intraceptor plasmid produces an anti-VEGF protein that is selectively retained in endoplasmic reticulum, resulting in VEGF sequestration and reduced secretion (Singh et al. 2006), extracellular concentrations of this anti-VEGF protein
