- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
250 |
R. Herrero-Vanrell |
10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
Microparticles intended for the treatment of posterior segment diseases have been mainly injected by periocular or intravitreal injection. Although several studies have been conducted employing topical routes there is no evidence of effective concentrations in the vitreous with this administration.
PLGA microparticles have been prepared with different drugs, such as adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and RA for proliferative retinopathy, dexamethasone and cyclosporine for uveitis, anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for age macular degeneration (AMD), budesonide and celecoxib for diabetic retinopathy, TA for macular edema, acyclovir for herpes infection, ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus retinitis, neurotrophic factors for neuroprotection, an inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC412) for choroidal neovascularization (CNV), triamcinolone for macular edema, neuroprotective agents for glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa, and a combination of steroids (TA) and antibiotic agents (ciprofloxacin) to prevent ocular inflammation and infection after cataract surgery. Finally, co-transplantation of MMP2-microspheres and RPCs ha been reported as a practical and effective strategy for retinal repair.
10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
Antiproliferative drugs have demonstrated to be therapeutically active in the treatment of the PVR in which contractile cellular membranes are formed mainly by retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells (Pastor 1998). Microparticles employed for the treatment of PVR have been loaded with active agents with antiproliferative activity (Moritera et al. 1991, 1992). Adriamycine was encapsulated in PLA (3,400 Da). Microspheres (50 mm size) containing 1% of the active substance were injected in normal rabbit eyes and in a rabbit model of PVR and compared with the administration of the active substance alone. The authors found a significant decrease in the retinal toxicity of the single injection of 10 mg of adriamycine in comparison with the administration of 10 mg of PLA microspheres containing 10 mg of the drug with neither histological abnormalities nor electrophysiologic changes in the eye. Regarding to antiproliferative properties, the RD was decreased from 50 to 10% after 4 weeks of the administration. On the contrary, a dose of 3 mg of PLA microspheres containing 3 mg of adriamycine did not decrease the rate of RD.
Moritera et al. (1991) demonstrated the influence of the polymer composition and the molecular weight of the polymer on the release in vitro and in vivo of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) from microspheres 50 mm size. The polymers employed were two low molecular weight PLAs (3,400 and 4,700 Da) and PLGA (70:30, 3,300 Da). PLGA microspheres showed an in vitro release of almost the whole 5FU (98%) in only 2 days while the PLA took 7 days to release 85% of the encapsulated drug. Microspheres prepared from PLGA 4,700 daltons released 70% of 5FU over 7 days.
10 Microparticles as Drug Delivery Systems for the Back of the Eye |
251 |
In the in vivo studies, the authors reported a faster clearance of the drug and the microspheres in vitrectomized and pathologic eyes compared with healthy animals. Authors observed that microspheres disappear from the vitreous cavity in 48 ± 5.2 days for normal eyes and 14 ± 2.4 days in animals that underwent vitrectomy before the injection of the microspheres.
Peyman et al. (1992) evaluated the release kinetic of radiolabeled 5-FU and cytosine arabinoside in primates. Both drugs exhibited similar release kinetics with detectable drug levels in the vitreous up to 11 days after the administration of the formulation.
Giordano et al. (1993) studied the intravitreous release of RA in a rabbit model of PVR caused by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. The incidence of tractional retinal detachment (TRD) resulted effectively reduced when compared to blank microspheres 2 months after a single injection of 5 mg of RA-loaded microspheres (110 mg RA). In the same study, 82% of the encapsulated RA was released in vitro for 40 days at room temperature.
In all reported studies, the rate or incidence of retinal traction detachment decreased after injection of PLGA microspheres.
10.9.2 Uveitis
The term “uveitis” is used to denote any intraocular inflammatory condition without reference to the underlying cause (Rodríguez et al. 1996). In fact, uveitis is considered to be an intraocular autoimmune or inflammatory disease involving the ciliary body, choroids, and/or adjacent tissues. The disease has both acute and chronic manifestations.
Corticosteroids have demonstrated to be the most efficient anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of acute ocular inflammations, including uveitis. Current treatment for chronic features usually includes topical, periocular, or systemic corticosteroids (Smith 2004). In fact, transitory therapeutic drug levels can be attained through the administration of steroids by intravitreal injections (Gaudio 2004). Nevertheless, therapeutic drug concentrations are difficult to attain in the vitreous for a prolonged period of time due to the short, intravitreal half-life of corticosteroids (Kwak and D¢Amico 1992).
Barcia et al. (2009) developed PLGA microspheres for the sustained delivery of dexamethasone destined to prevent intraocular inflammation. Ten milligrams of the PLGA 50:50 (0.2 dl/g) microspheres containing 1,410 mg of dexamethasone were injected in 0.1 ml of PBS in an animal model of inflammation. The active substance was released in vitro for at least 45 days. In this study, a LPS injection was carried out 7 days after the injection of the microspheres (53–106 mm). Intraocular inflammation, caused by LPS injection was significantly lower in animals receiving the dexamethasone loaded microspheres than blank microspheres. In order to simulate secondary uveitis, a second injection of LPS was performed 30 days after microparticles injection. No inflammation was observed in the animals treated with dexamethasone loaded PLGA microspheres after second LPS injection (Fig. 10.12).
252
Inflammation grade
LPS
|
R. Herrero-Vanrell |
|
MICROSPHERES LOADED WITH DEXAMETHASONE FOR |
|
THE TREATMENT OF UVEITIS |
4.5 |
Non treated animals |
4.0 |
Blank microspheres |
3.5 |
Dexamethasone loaded microspheres |
|
|
3.0 |
|
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
20 |
22 |
24 |
26 |
28 |
30 |
32 |
34 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*microparticles were injected 7 days before LPS inyection |
|
LPS |
|||||||||||||||
Fig. 10.12 Intraocular inflammation after injection of sterilized 10 mg of PLGA 50:50 (53–106 mm) unloaded and loaded with dexamethasone (140 mg/mg microspheres). Microparticles were administered 1 week before lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. Adapted from Barcia et al. (2009)
Immunosuppressant drugs are useful in the treatment of uveitis. Cyclosporine (CyS) PLGA (75:25) microparticles of approximately 50 mm maintained therapeutic CyS concentrations for at least 65 days in disease-related tissues such as the choroid-retina and iris-ciliary body. The molecular weight of the polymer was 15,000 Da. In this study, microspheres loaded with CyS increased the mean residence time of the active substance around 10 times compared to CyS solution. The therapeutic level was maintained for 65 days (He et al. 2006).
10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
AMD is the most common cause of blindness in the elderly populations of western countries. The exudative form of AMD might lead to CNV. PLGA microspheres loaded with anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been assayed for reducing the formation of new blood vessels in the eye (Gomes Dos Santos et al. 2005).
10 Microparticles as Drug Delivery Systems for the Back of the Eye |
253 |
10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
Microparticles loaded with budesonide were injected subconjunctivally for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. In this study, delivery of the active substance was sustained better in microparticles (3.6 mm) compared with nanoparticles (345 nm) (Kompella et al. 2003; Amrite and Kompella 2005). Nanoparticles were removed more rapidly from the subconjunctival site of administration compared with the microparticles. Microparticles were able to alleviate biochemical changes associated with diabetic retinopathy.
Sterilized celecoxib PLGA (85:15) microspheres (1.11 ± 0.08 mm) prepared by the solvent evaporation method were injected in a streptozotocin diabetic rat model. The efficacy of the formulation was demonstrated by dividing the animals in groups of normal and diabetic animals. Both groups received no treatment, blank microspheres or celecoxib-loaded microspheres. Fifty microliters of PBS of microparticle suspensions were injected into the posterior subconjunctival space (ipsilateral) through a 27-G needle. The dose of celecoxib assayed was 750 mg. The microparticulate system was able to delay the development or progression of the early pathophysiological changes in the retina as a result of diabetes. These findings were demonstrated by means of reduction of diabetes induced retinal PGE2, VEGF, and breakdown of the blood retinal barrier at the end of 60 days of diabetes (Amrite et al. 2006).
10.9.5 Macular edema
Macular edema is usually treated with corticosteroids, among which TA is the most commonly used. Cardillo et al. (2006) reported human studies of PLGA microspheres loaded with triamcinolone (referred in the study as RETAAC system). Microspheres loaded with TA were suspended in PBS and then injected intravitreally into nine patients suffering diffuse macular edema and their efficacy compared to conventional TA injections. Eyes treated with TA microspheres showed marked decrease of retinal thickness as well as improved visual acuity (VA) for 12 months. In addition, the authors reported preliminary results with good tolerance for the PLGA microparticles.
10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
ARN is a viral infection characterized by necrosis of retinal cells that can lead to irreversible blindness. Some herpes viruses that infect humans are herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, varicella zoster, and Epstein–Barr viruses. The therapy
